Trends in management of odontoid fractures 2010-2021.

Background Context: Odontoid fractures are relatively common. However, the literature is unclear how these fractures are best managed in many scenarios. As such, care is varied and poorly characterized. Purpose: To investigate the trends and predictive factors of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment and anterior versus posterior stabilization of odontoid fractures. Study Design/Setting: Retrospective database cohort study. Patient Sample: Adult patients with odontoid fractures between 2010 and 2021. Outcome Measures: Yearly trends and predictors of odontoid fracture management. Methods: Adult patients with odontoid fractures were abstracted from the large, national, administrative M161Ortho Pearldiver dataset. For operative versus nonoperative care of odontoid fractures, yearly rates were determined (since 2016 based on coding limitations). For anterior versus posterior stabilization, yearly rates were determined (2010-2021). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed for both sets of comparisons. Results: For assessment of nonsurgical versus surgical management from 2016 to 2021, a total of 42,754 patients with odontoid fracture were identified, of which surgical intervention was done for 7.9%. Predictive factors of surgical intervention included being managed by a neurosurgeon (OR:1.29), being from Midwest United States (OR:1.35 relative to West), male sex (OR:1.20), and decreasing age (OR: 0.82 per decade) (p < .001 for each). Of those undergoing surgical intervention, 33.6% had anterior surgery while 66.4% had posterior surgery (anterior surgery decreased from 36.4% in 2010 to 27.2% in 2021, p < .001). Predictive factors of undergoing anterior versus posterior approach include having a neurosurgeon surgeon (OR:1.98), being from the Southern (OR:1.61 relative to Northeast), and having Medicare insurance (OR: 1.31) (p < .001 for each). Conclusions: The overall rate of surgery for odontoid fractures has remained similar over the past years. Of those undergoing surgery, less are being done from anterior. While these decisions were predicted by some clinical factors, both also correlated with nonclinical factors suggesting room for more consistent algorithms.

Corrigendum: Outcomes of olecranon fractures in adolescents: comparison of tension band wiring and Herbert screw fixations.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1269628.].

Ultrasonography-guided canal decompression combined with vertebroplasty and cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation for stage III Kümmell's disease with neurological deficits: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty is the preferred procedure for stage I and II Kümmell's diseases (KDs), but there exist controversies on the operative option of stage III KD. This study aimed at exploring the safety and efficacy of ultrasonography-guided canal decompression (UG-CD) combined with vertebroplasty and cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CA-PSF) for treating stage III KD with neurological deficit (ND). METHODS: Between September 2017 and December 2023, all patients who received the UG-CD combined with vertebroplasty and CA-PSF for managing stage III KD with NDs were reviewed retrospectively with their demographic and operation data, and complications recorded. Besides, the scores of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), together with imaging data including the kyphotic Cobb angle (KCA), wedge angle (WA), spinal canal area (SCA) at the narrowest level as well as anterior (AHR) and middle (MHR) height ratios were measured and compared between pre- and post-operation. RESULTS: A total of eleven patients with a mean age of 70.09 ± 2.98 years old were included in our study with their surgical time, hospitalization length, blood loss, and follow-up time being 150.91 ± 17.94 min, 202.09 ± 39.95 ml, 8.18 ± 1.17 days, and 16.91 ± 4.09 months, respectively. During the final follow-up, the KCA, WA, VAS scores, ODI scores, AHR, MHR, and SCA were significantly improved (P < 0.01). Intraoperatively, one case suffered a transient decrease in the motor evoked potential. Another case experienced a cerebrospinal fluid leakage postoperatively that was then successfully treated. CONCLUSION: UG-CD combined with vertebroplasty and CA-PSF could be a feasible procedure for safely and effectively handling stage III KD with NDs.

Differences in gait analysis and clinical outcome after dynamic fixation or screw fixation in acute syndesmosis tear: a prospective randomized pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Acute syndesmosis tears can be treated by static screw or dynamic fixation. Various studies have compared these techniques regarding postoperative outcome. However, to our knowledge, no study has used 3D-instrumented gait analysis (IGA). We hypothesized that a dynamic fixation would perform non-inferior to screw fixation in terms of biomechanical and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized to both groups. All patients received the same follow-up rehabilitation and consultations (6 and 12 weeks; 6 and 12 months) postoperatively. Standardized questionnaires were used to objectify pain and ankle function. At 6 months follow-up, IGA was conducted additionally to objectify the biomechanical outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients in the dynamic fixation (DF) group using TightRope® and twenty-five in the screw fixation group (SF) completed gait analysis. The DF group showed significantly higher mean values for maximum moment in the affected ankle joint (DF: 1.40 ± 0.21 Nm, SF: 1.23 ± 0.30 Nm; p = 0.023) and the unaffected ankle joint (DF: 1.52 ± 0.20 Nm, SF: 1.37 ± 0.27 Nm; p = 0.035). The difference between the affected and unaffected ankle joint was significantly higher in the SF group for active plantarflexion (DF: 1.52 ± 0.20°, SF: 1.37 ± 0.27°; p = 0.035). Both dynamic and screw fixation groups exhibited significantly reduced plantarflexion during the push-off and early swing phase, with moments and powers in the ankle joint also significantly impaired. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that dynamic fixation has better or similar biomechanical and clinical outcomes compared to screw fixation. Future research should focus on biomechanical differences during gait as well as clinical outcomes in case of earlier weight-bearing after dynamic fixation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (TRN): DRKS00013562 Date of Registration: 07/12/2017.

Case report of minimally invasive spinal endoscopic debridement and pedicle screw fixation for severe spinal infection of the lumbosacral spine.

Background: Surgical treatment of spinal infections, refractory to medical treatments, is increasing in incidence. Here, we present a unique case of discitis secondary to an iatrogenic cause, spinal steroid injection, that resulted in acute neurology, ventral phlegmon, and osteomyelitis requiring multiple surgical interventions for treatment. Case Description: With the adoption of minimally invasive spinal surgery, the patient underwent full endoscopic debridement and decompression at our hospital. The endoscopic technique offers a unique avenue to the anatomically difficult ventral phlegmon for surgical excision, cultures, and pathogen identification. The endoscopic debridement was paired with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation to stabilize the spine from the worsening bone destruction. Outcome: The patient recovered well postoperatively, with the resolution of her neurological symptoms and improved mobility. Conclusions: Full endoscopic spinal debridement and decompression is a powerful tool to manage severe spinal discitis and preliminary studies encourage its adoption in surgical practices.

Patient-reported and radiological outcomes of short Scarf osteotomy fixed with a single screw: A prospective study of 271 osteotomies.

The Scarf osteotomy involves inherent risks and technical challenges. The short scarf osteotomy with single screw fixation has emerged as an alternative approach. This study aims to evaluate the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiological outcomes, and complications associated with the short scarf osteotomy fixed with a single screw for hallux valgus correction. A prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2018 and October 2023 at a single center, encompassing 271 osteotomies. PROMs were collected prospectively preoperatively and at various postoperative intervals. Radiographic data, including hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA), were measured preoperatively and six weeks postoperatively. Complications were also documented. Statistically significant improvements were observed in all PROMs and were sustained up to 24 months postoperatively. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score demonstrated a significant reduction from 46.97 at baseline to 12.52 at 24 months (p < 0.001). Likewise, the EQ-5D score improved notably from 0.73 preoperatively to 0.81 at 24 months (p = 0.002). Analysis of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) revealed substantial improvements across its pain, walking/standing, and social interaction domains over the same period, with all changes showing statistical significance (all p < 0.001). Radiographically, the mean HVA improved significantly from 31.33° preoperatively to 13.33° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean IMA improved significantly from 14.67° to 7.66° (p < 0.001). The most common complication was superficial wound infection, effectively managed with oral antibiotics. The were no cases of avascular necrosis or fracture. In conclusion, the short Scarf osteotomy fixed with a single screw demonstrates favorable outcomes. These findings support its efficacy and safety as a treatment option, with potential advantages over the conventional technique. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Early postoperative efficacy of a fully automated orthopedic robotic system-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis.

To assess the feasibility of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation assisted by a fully automated orthopedic robotic system for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis and evaluate its early postoperative outcome. Totally 20 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent surgical procedure by the same medical group from March 2020 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 10 patients in the robot-assisted group (RA group) and the other 10 patients in the conventional free-hand technique group (FH group). Accuracy of screw insertion was determined using the Gertzbein-Robbins Scale. The accuracy of the novel robotic system was evaluated by comparing the screw position in the preoperative planning and measuring the entry point deviation distance and the trajectory rotation. The differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, radiographic fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopic dosage, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. The lumbar visual analog scale scores before and 7 days after operation were analyzed to evaluate the improvement of low back pain as the early postoperative outcome. A total of 84 pedicle screws were placed. In the RA group, 97.5% of screws were Grade A, and 2.5% were Grade B. In the FH group, 88.6% of screws were Grade A, 9.1% were Grade B, and 2.3% were Grade C. No statistical difference was found in the operation time between two groups. The RA group showed a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss, radiographic fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopic dosage, and length of hospital stay compared to the FH group. The low back pain in both groups was significantly improved after the operation. The novel orthopedic robotic system-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, with accurate intraoperative screw placement, less surgical damage, less fluoroscopy and shorter length of hospital stay, can be safe and effective for the surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Biomechanical Effects of a Novel Standalone Posterior Lumbar Facet Joint Stabilization Device: An In Vitro Cadaveric Study.

OBJECTIVE: Although pedicle screw and rod instrumentation remains the gold standard method of posterior rod fixation, it is associated with complications, including pedicle breach and facet joint violation. There is current interest in facet joint stabilization with the potential to create a less invasive, natural arch of fixation that may avoid the complications associated with pedicle screw and rod instrumentation. This study examined the stabilizing potential of a novel facet joint fixation device for single-level (L4-L5) fixation in a human cadaveric model. METHODS: Six L3-S1 specimens were tested multidirectionally under pure moment loading (7.5 Nm) in 3 conditions: 1) intact, 2) L4-L5 facet fixation without screws, and 3) L4-L5 facet fixation with screws. L4-L5 intervertebral disc angles were measured radiographically. Range of motion (ROM) and disc angles were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Compared with the intact condition, L4-L5 bilateral facet fixation without or with screw fixation significantly reduced L4-L5 angular ROM in all directions (P ≤ 0.003). No significant differences were observed in cranial and caudal adjacent-segment ROM (P ≥ 0.08) except for L3-L4 fixation in extension, which exhibited small motion increases (0.12° without screws, 0.1° with screws) versus the intact condition (P ≤ 0.003). No statistically significant differences were observed in disc angle values between the conditions (P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral lumbar facet fixation with and without supplemental transfacet screw fixation provided significant stability. Cranial and caudal adjacent-level ROM was not influenced by facet fixation except for a slight increase in cranial segment motion during extension. Facet fixation did not alter the lordotic intervertebral disc angle at the instrumented level.

Favorable Short-Term Outcomes of a Patient With Symptomatic Bipartite Navicular Bone Treated by Screw Fixation.

Bipartite navicular bone is an uncommon foot pathology that generally occurs in adolescent patients. However, some patients may become symptomatic during adulthood. When conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment is performed. However, due to a lack of high-quality evidence, the optimal surgical strategy for bipartite navicular remains unclear. The talonavicular arthrodesis and internal fixation of the fragment have been reported as the surgical choice of the symptomatic bipartite navicular. The internal fixation of the fragment may have a high risk of postoperative nonunion. However, talonavicular arthrodesis results in the limitation of the motion and function of the midfoot, which may cause dysfunction or osteoarthritis of the adjacent joints. This paper aims to present an adult case of symptomatic bipartite navicular that was treated by the internal fixation of the fragment using screws, with a favorable short-term outcome.

Preoperative Three-Dimensional Planning Using Computed Tomography Improves Screw Placement in Patients Undergoing Acetabular Revision Surgery.

Background: Stable fixation of joint replacement implants is essential to achieve osseointegration in uncemented implants. In acetabular revisions, screws often need to be utilized in quadrants other than the historically so-called "safe" zones to attain sufficient stability. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative three-dimensional (3D) planning for acetabular revision surgery influences screw length, specifically in the superior pubic ramus (SPR). Methods: Between March 2017 and December 2021, 20 patients underwent preoperative two-dimensional (2D) planning (2D group), and 30 patients underwent 3D planning following the implementation of a new 3D planning software into clinical practice in September 2019 (3D group). Two observers, blinded to the groups, measured the total screw length, screw penetration depth, and cup position on available postoperative computed tomography examinations. For statistical comparisons, the mean measurement from the 2 observers was used. Results: The median total screw lengths in the SPR were 16 mm in the 2D group and 25 mm in the 3D group (P = .004) and 40.5 mm compared with 50.5 mm in the ilium (P = .019). Median screw penetration depths in the SPR were 0 mm in the 2D group and 1.25 mm in the 3D group (P = .049). Conclusion: Longer screws were used in the SPR and ilium when preoperative 3D planning was conducted. Due to the study design, we were not able to evaluate whether longer screws lead to better fixation. Further studies are needed to elucidate this question.

Comparative study on anterior pelvic plating and pubic ramus screw fixation for straddle fracture: a matched-pair outcome analysis.

PURPOSE: Straddle fractures involving both the superior and inferior rami often require surgical fixation due to instability. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of pubic ramus screw fixation (PRSF) and anterior pelvic plating (APP) for the treatment of these fractures to identify the superior method. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients (37 males, 33 females; average age 47.6 years) treated surgically for straddle fractures at two Level 1 trauma centres between May 2017 and August 2022. The patients were divided into two groups, where 26 underwent PRSF and 44 underwent APP. The groups were matched based on preoperative characteristics such as age, sex, body mass index, injury mechanism, and severity. The key variables analysed included operation time, blood transfusion volume, early weight-bearing capability, and complication and reoperation rates. RESULTS: After matching, PRSF was associated with a shorter operative time (71.0 min vs. 118.3 min for APP, p < 0.0009) and lower blood transfusion requirements (0 units vs. 1 unit, p < 0.0001). Postoperatively, 61.5% of PRSF patients tolerated early weight-bearing, compared to none in the APP group. However, in two cases, PRSF could not be performed due to severe comminution or anatomical limitations, necessitating conversion to APP. Complication rates were similar between the groups (30.8% for PRSF vs. 27.3% for APP, p = 0.93). CONCLUSION: PRSF demonstrated advantages, such as shorter operative time, reduced blood transfusions, and earlier weight-bearing. However, APP remains valuable for complex fracture patterns. Treatment should be individualized based on fracture complexity and patient-specific factors to optimize outcomes.

Outcome Measures of Open versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Thoracolumbar Spinal Traumatic Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of open and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: Online databases MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, and Cochrane were searched for English language articles published between January 2001 and December 2023, limited to articles that included the clinical and radiological outcomes of adult patients. The main outcome measures of the study were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, and the Cobb angle. Results: A total of 7 studies involving 909 patients were included; 374 (41.1%) procedures were performed with open surgery (OS), while 535 (58.9%) procedures were conducted with minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The mean value of ODI in the MIS group was 8.29% [CI 95% 4.82-11.76], compared to the other group, which was 14.22% (p-value 0.87). Patients receiving a MIS had an average NRS of 1.54 [CI95% 0.98-2.10] whilst OS had 2.31 [CI95% 1.50-3.12] (p-value 0.12). Conclusions: The percutaneous technique is equally safe and effective in resolving the deformity, but the clear advantages are represented by the reduction in blood loss, shorter operative times, a lower incidence of infection, shorter hospitalization, shorter postoperative rehabilitation, and therefore good results in terms of quality of life.

Evaluating laminar and lateral mass screw techniques in cervical injury management: A case series.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: The cervical spine is a dynamic structure that protects adjacent nervous innervation and maintains the range of motion (ROM) of the head and neck. Fractures in this area can lead to high mortality and morbidity, with bone fractures accounting for 56 % of cervical spinal cord injuries. This case series presents a series of cervical pathologies treated with posterior decompression and stabilization using laminar and lateral mass screw fixation. METHODS: This research is a case series of four patients treated with laminar and lateral mass screw technique. All patients received a surgical procedure, including posterior compression and stabilization, which included the use of a laminar and lateral mass screw. We followed the patient for 12 months. During follow up, outcome measures consisting of VAS, range of motion, neurological status, ODI Score, SF-12 Score and any complications related to the surgical procedure was recorded and calculated every 3 months. OUTCOMES: This series examines four distinct cases. The initial case pertained to a female patient, aged 72, who exhibited tetraparesis resulting from a burst fracture occurring in the C3-C5 vertebrae. The underlying etiology of this pathology is considered to be mineral bone disease associated with thyroid hormone imbalance due to thyroid cancer. The second instance was a 14-year-old child experiencing neck pain due to spondylitis tuberculosis in the C1-C2 region, accompanied by a retropharyngeal abscess and occipitocervical dissociation (OCD) with basilar invagination. The third example pertained to a patient who is 9 years old and presented with weakness in all extremities due to C1 fracture-dislocation. The fourth case was a 14-year-old patient who experienced a fall from a bunk bed. This patient was diagnosed with Traumatic Atlantoaxial dislocation with odontoid fracture Type II. All patients showed improved cervical curvature and range of motion with the advantages of reduction of intraoperative haemorrhage, as well as a decrease in postoperative rehabilitation duration. Overall, the data shows a general trend of improvement in VAS and ODI scores over time, with SF-12 scores stabilizing or slightly decreasing by 12 months post-operation. CONCLUSION: The use of a lateral mass screw for subaxial cervical injuries can be employed to manage cervical spine pathologies like fractures and infections, including spondylitis TB. However, more research is required to evaluate the long-term complications and success rates of this technique.

Duverney's Fracture Fixed by Skiver Screw in a Skeletally Immature Patient: A Case Report.

Duverney's fracture, an eponym for isolated iliac wing fracture, is rather an uncommon fracture in the subset of pelvic ring fracture in the AO/OTA (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association) classification. Here, we discuss a more unique case with Duverney's fracture since the patient is a 15-year-old school-going girl with unfused physis of the ilium. After other injuries were ruled out, she underwent open reduction and fixation with a screw by the Skiver method augmented with the plate. Postoperatively, she was mobilized, and follow-up at eight months showed radiologically complete union with good functional outcome.

Nondestructive acoustic modal analysis for assessing bone screw stability: An ex vivo animal study.

Conventional insertion torque and pull-out tests are destructive and unsuitable for clinical bone screw fixation. This study evaluates screw stability using acoustic modal analysis (AMA) and Periotest compared to traditional methods in an ex vivo animal model. Titanium self-tapping screws (STS) and nonself-tapping screws (N-STS) were implanted in the proximal tibia of 12 rabbits. Four testing methods were used to assess screw stability: peak insertion torque (PIT) during implantation, AMA for natural frequency (NF), Periotest for Periotest value (PTV), and pull-out test for peak pullout force (PPF). Euthanization was performed at 0 (primary stability), 4, and 8 weeks (secondary stability). No significant difference in primary stability was found between STS and N-STS except for AMA (STS: NF 2434 ± 67 Hz, N-STS: NF 2572 ± 43 Hz; p = 0.62). Secondary stability increased significantly over time for both screw types (4-week: NF 3687 ± 36 vs. 3408 ± 45 Hz, PTV 1.4 ± 1.6 vs. -1.5 ± 1.8, PPF 236 ± 29 vs. 220 ± 34 N; 8-week: NF 3890 ± 39 vs. 3613 ± 31 Hz, PTV -3.2 ± 2.5 vs. -2 ± 4.3, PPF 248 ± 25 vs. 289 ± 28 N). Higher NF values for given PTV/PPF indicate potential clinical advantages. Significant differences between primary and secondary stabilities suggest osteointegration was mainly achieved in the 4-week group.

Comparative effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion with anterior screw fixation versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for treating lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Lumbar degenerative diseases impose a substantial health burden, prompting the exploration of advanced surgical approaches such as Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy of OLIF with anterior screw fixation (OLIF-AF) against OLIF with posterior pedicle fixation (OLIF-PF) in addressing these conditions. METHODS: A systematic search across multiple databases identified five studies meeting inclusion criteria, incorporating a total of 271 patients. Comparative analysis encompasses primary and secondary outcomes related to fusion rates, intraoperative parameters, patient-reported measures, and radiographic assessments. RESULTS: Primary outcome analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in total fusion rates between OLIF-AF and OLIF-PF. However, secondary outcomes revealed distinct advantages in OLIF-AF, showcasing lower intraoperative blood loss and reduced operative times compared to OLIF-PF. Nonetheless, patient-reported outcomes, encompassing measures such as pain scores and functional assessments, as well as radiographic parameters, exhibited no significant variations between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: While OLIF-AF displayed favorable results in intraoperative parameters, such as reduced blood loss and shorter operative times, it did not significantly differ in patient-reported outcomes and radiographic assessments compared to OLIF-PF. Interpretation of findings must consider limitations in sample sizes and study heterogeneity. Future investigations with larger, more diverse cohorts and extended follow-ups are imperative to confirm these preliminary findings and comprehend the actual clinical impact of these OLIF techniques in managing lumbar degenerative diseas.

Risk factors for malalignment after intramedullary nail treatment of distal tibia fractures with associated fibula fractures.

PURPOSE: Malalignment of distal tibia fractures can lead to malunion/nonunion or alter the limb mechanical axis which may cause arthritis. Proposed methods to decrease malalignment include fibular fixation or multiplanar interlocking screws, however these remain controversial. This study aimed to identify factors associated with malalignment in distal tibial fractures with associated fibular shaft fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of distal tibia fractures with associated fibular shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing at two level one trauma centers between 2015 and 2019. Cases involving malalignment (> 5° of deviation from anatomic axis on either coronal/sagittal axis) on final follow-up (minimum three months postoperatively) were compared to those without malalignment with regard to demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative characteristics, and complications. RESULTS: The rate of malalignment was 13%. On multivariate analysis, multiplanar distal interlocking screw fixation (odds ratio [OR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.92) was associated with a decreased rate of final malalignment, while nail diameter > 10 mm was associated with a higher rate (OR, 4.05; 95% CI 1.25-13.11). Fibular fixation was not associated with malalignment. CONCLUSION: Multiplanar distal interlocking screws may protect against malalignment. Fibula fixation does not appear associated with a decreased rate of malalignment in distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Fixation Results in Similar Clinical Outcomes, Less Range of Motion Limitation but Poorer Quality of Reduction compared to Open Screw Fixation for Acute Large Anterior Glenoid Rim Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation for acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures. METHODS: This study enrolled patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures treated with arthroscopic suture anchor fixation (group A) or open screw fixation (group O) from January 2013 to June 2020 with a minimum follow-up of＞2 years. The Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe score, Constant score, range of motion (ROM), recurrent instability rate, and complications were recorded as clinical results. The quality of the postoperative reduction, reconstructed glenoid sizes, rate of fracture healing, and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) were evaluated as radiological outcomes. RESULTS: This retrospective study included 66 patients, including 37 in Group A and 29 in Group O with a mean follow-up of 46.9 (range, 24.3-94.2) months and a mean patient age of 46.8 (range, 21-69) years. No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. A significant ROM limitation in all planes was found in both groups and group O showed more limitations in external rotation at the side (ERs) (18° vs. 10°, P = 0.002). The reduction quality was better in group O (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of reconstructed glenoid size (101.6% ± 4.6% vs. 100.6% ± 7.1%, P = 0.460) and the rate of OA progression (26.9% vs. 20%, P = 0.525). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation achieved similar clinical outcomes, reconstructed glenoid sizes, and OA progression in patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures. Arthroscopic suture fixation showed a poorer quality of reduction but less ERs limitations.

Anterior odontoid screw fixation of a type III odontoid fracture aided by transoral digital manipulation: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Odontoid process fractures make up 10%-20% of all cervical spine fractures, with type III fractures having a considerable amount of heterogeneity. Most simple type III fractures can be managed nonoperatively. However, 21% of complex type III fractures with significant displacement and angulation are inadequately treated with external immobilization and require surgery. Achieving a reduction via traction can pose a great challenge during intraoperative manipulation, especially when presentation is delayed. OBSERVATIONS: A 36-year-old male patient, who presented 2 weeks after a motor vehicle crash, had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 and intact motor and sensory function. A craniocervical computed tomograpy scan revealed a normal brain with a type III odontoid fracture. The patient underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) aided by a transoral digital manipulation to achieve a reduction of the irreducible proximal fracture segment at 8 weeks postinjury. The treatment resulted in preserved neurological function and a satisfactory odontoid fracture reduction. LESSONS: Delayed presentation of a complex type III odontoid fracture can be challenging to treat; however, AOSF with the aid of transoral digital manipulation of the irreducible proximal segment can help to achieve good reduction and fusion with the preservation of neurological function in a young patient. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24294.