Expression of RSK4 protein in non-small cell lung cancer tissues, adjacent tissues and its correlation with clinicopathological features.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the expression of Ribosomal S6 kinase 4 (RSK4) protein in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues, and to elucidate its correlation with clinicopathological features of NSCLC. METHODS: We analyzed 100 NSCLC patients treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from June 2020 to June 2022. Patient demographics and clinical data, including gender, age, history of diabetes, tumor location, degree of tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and clinical stage, were collected. RSK4 protein expression was assessed in tissue samples via immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: RSK4 protein was positively expressed in 35.00% of cancerous tissues, significantly lower than the 69.00% observed in adjacent non-tumor tissues (P < 0.05). Patients with lower tumor differentiation, advanced Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stages, and lymph node metastases showed significantly reduced RSK4 expression compared to those with higher differentiation, earlier TNM stages, and no lymph node metastases (all P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis indicated that TNM stage, low differentiation, and lymph node metastases significantly influenced RSK4 expression (all P < 0.05). Survival analysis revealed a higher positive prognosis survival rate of 74.29% (26/35) among patients with positive RSK4 expression, versus 53.85% (35/65) in those with negative expression (P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation of RSK4 expression with TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and patient prognosis (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Positive RSK4 expression in NSCLC tissues is significantly correlated with advanced cancer stage, poor differentiation, and presence of lymph node metastasis, suggesting a potential tumor suppressor role for RSK4 in NSCLC. This association underscores its prognostic relevance in NSCLC patients.

Mechanisms of resistance and correlation between pre-treatment co-alterations and p-prognosis to osimertinib in chemo-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Several patients treated with osimertinib experience progressive disease. The aim was to clarify the mechanisms underlying resistance to osimertinib. METHODS: ELUCIDATOR: A multi-centre, prospective, observational study involved chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving osimertinib. Mutations in cancer-associated genes, detected via ultrasensitive next-generation sequencing of circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid samples, were collected at baseline and after progressive disease detection. These paired plasma samples were compared. RESULTS: Of 188 patients enrolled (May 2019-January 2021), 178 (119 females [67 %]) median age 74 years, were included. Patients, n = 95 (53 %) had epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletion mutations. Among 115 patients with progressive disease, circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid levels of 85 patients were analysed. MET amplification (n = 4), TP53 mutations (n = 4), PIK3CA mutations (n = 3), BRINP3 mutation (n = 2), BRAF mutation (n = 2), APC mutation (n = 1), RET mutation (n = 1) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) resistance mutation, and C797S (n = 1) were detected. Patients with baseline TP53 mutations, with MET or EGFR amplification had shorter progression-free (PFS) and overall survival. Patients with PIK3CA mutations tended to shorter PFS. CONCLUSION: MET amplification and PIK3CA mutation mechanisms underly resistance to osimertinib in patients. Patients with coexisting mutations or amplifications at baseline had shorter PFS and overall survival.

Predicting lymphovascular invasion in N0 stage non-small cell lung cancer: A nomogram based on Dual-energy CT imaging and clinical findings.

PURPOSE: To construct a nomogram for predicting lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in N0 stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) findings combined with clinical findings. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited 135 patients with N0 stage NSCLC from two hospitals underwent DECT before surgery and were divided into development cohort (n = 107) and validation cohort (n = 28). The clinical findings (baseline characteristics, biochemical markers, serum tumor markers and Immunohistochemical markers), DECT-derived parameters (iodine concentration [IC], effective atomic number [Eff-Z] and normalized iodine concentration [NIC], iodine enhancement [IE] and NIC ratio [NICr]) and Fractal dimension (FD) were collected and measured. A nomogram was constructed using significant findings to predict LVI in N0 stage NSCLC and was externally validated. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed that lymphocyte count (LYMPH, odds ratio [OR]: 3.71, P=0.014), IC in arterial phase (ICa, OR: 1.25, P=0.021), NIC in venous phase (NICv, OR: 587.12, P=0.009) and FD (OR: 0.01, P=0.033) were independent significant factors for predicting LVI in N0 stage NSCLC, and were used to construct a nomogram. The nomogram exhibited robust predictive capabilities in both the development and validation cohort, with AUCs of 0.819 (95 % CI: 72.6-90.4) and 0.844 (95 % CI: 68.2-95.8), respectively. The calibration plots showed excellent agreement between the predicted probabilities and the actual rates of positive LVI, on external validation. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of clinical and DECT imaging findings could aid in predicting LVI in N0 stage NSCLC using significant findings of LYMPH, ICa, NICv and FD.

Clinical potential of SKP2 as diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive type of lung cancer. The overall survival has not improved significantly over the last decades because no major therapeutic breakthroughs have been achieved for over 15 years. METHODS: We analyzed a genome-wide loss-of-function screening database to identify vulnerabilities in SCLC for the development of urgently needed novel therapies. RESULTS: We identified SKP2 (encoding S-phase kinase-associated protein 2) and CKS1B (encoding CDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 1B) as the two most essential genes in that order in SCLC. Notably, SKP2 and CKS1B comprise the p27 binding pocket of the E3 ubiquitin ligase SCFSKP2 complex. Immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays revealed that SKP2 was expressed in >95% of samples at substantially higher levels than that observed for commonly used neuroendocrine markers. As expected, SCLC cell lines were sensitive to SKP2 inhibition. Furthermore, SKP2 or CKS1B knockdown induced apoptosis in RB1 mutant cells, whereas it induced senescence in RB1 wild-type cells. CONCLUSION: Although the mechanism underlying SKP2 knockdown-induced growth inhibition differs between RB1-wild-type and -mutant SCLC, SKP2 can be considered a novel therapeutic target for patients with SCLC regardless of the RB1 mutation status. Our findings indicate that SKP2 is a potential novel clinical diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in SCLC.

Ancestry-, Sex-, and Age-Based Differences of Gene Alterations in NSCLC: From the Real-World Data of Cancer Genomic Profiling Tests.

BACKGROUND: Some genomic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are known to differ according to race, sex, or age. These studies have been limited in sample size and thus they cannot detect the differences precisely and comprehensively. METHODS: Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 75,362 patients with NSCLC from the United States during routine clinical care. Additionally, we examined data of a Japanese NSCLC cohort with 1,019 patients. In the US cohort, 296 genes were examined for pathogenic alterations. Predominant genetic ancestry was inferred using a SNP-based approach, and patients were categorized into European (EUR), African (AFR), East Asian (EAS), Admixed American (AMR), and South Asian (SAS) ancestry groups. Patients were additionally stratified by histologic type, age (<40/≥40 years, <75/≥75 years), and sex. The prevalence of high tumor mutational burden (TMB-High) and microsatellite instability status was also calculated. RESULTS: Stratified by ancestry, EGFR alterations were significantly enriched in EAS versus other ancestry groups. The prevalence of ALK was significantly higher in the AMR, EAS, and SAS patients than in AFR and EUR patients. KRAS and STK11 were enriched in EUR and AFR patients versus other groups. TMB-High was significantly enriched in AFR patients versus all other groups. An analysis based on sex revealed differences in prevalence of alterations in 80 genes and TMB-High status. For example, EGFR, ALK, BRAF, and KRAS alterations were significantly enriched in females, whereas TP53, STK11, KEAP1, and TMB-High were significantly enriched in males. With respect to age, the prevalence of alterations in 41 genes, including ALK, RET, MET, EGFR, STK11, KEAP1, BRAF, and KRAS, as well as TMB-High, were significantly different between patients aged <40 years and those aged ≥40 years. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive analysis from a large real-world dataset revealed ancestry-associated differences in genomic alterations in NSCLC. Age- and sex-related differences in prevalence of genomic alterations and TMB-High status were also observed.

Long Noncoding RNA NKX2-1-AS1 Accelerates Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Progression through the miR-589-5p/NME1 Axis.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common malignancy worldwide, with a high death rate. Long noncoding RNA (LncRNA) NKX2-1 antisense RNA 1 (NKX2-1-AS1) has been reported to be an oncogene in lung tumorigenesis. However, the precise mechanism of NKX2-1-AS1 underlying NSCLC progression is blurry. The intention of our research was to probe the potential mechanism of NKX2-1-AS1 underlying NSCLC. NKX2-1-AS1 expression and relevant downstream gene expression were measured using RT-qPCR. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were determined by MTT assay, EdU assay along with flow cytometry analysis. Cell migratory and invasive abilities were inspected by transwell assay. Western blot and immunofluorescence staining were utilized to assess the levels of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins. RNA pull-down together with luciferase reporter assays were performed to verify the interaction between NKX2-1-AS1 and its downstream RNAs. Xenograft tumor-bearing mouse models were built to analyze tumor growth in vivo. The results suggested that NKX2-1-AS1 was upregulated in NSCLC patient tissues and cell lines. NKX2-1-AS1 deficiency suppressed cell proliferation, migration, invasion and EMT while elevated apoptosis. NKX2-1-AS1 bound to miR-589-5p, and NME/NM23 nucleoside diphosphate kinase 1 (NME1) was targeted by miR-589-5p in NSCLC cells. Additionally, NKX2-1-AS1 accelerated the progression of NSCLC by regulating miR-589-5p/NME1 axis. NKX2-1-AS1 knockdown repressed tumor growth in vivo. In conclusion, NKX2-1-AS1 accelerated the NSCLC progression through interacting with miR-589-5p for NME1 upregulation, which may provide clues for NSCLC targeting therapy.

High success rate of first proficiency testing for RET fusions and RET mutations in lung and thyroid cancer samples by various methods.

This study describes the external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for molecular testing of RET alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTC), and non-MTC. The lead panel institute and Quality Assurance Initiative in Pathology (Qualitätssicherungs-Initiative Pathologie [QuIP] GmbH) selected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from MTC for RET mutation testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods and FFPE tissue from NSCLC and non-MTC for RET gene fusion testing using either in situ hybridisation (ISH) or NGS methods, forming 3 sub-schemes of the EQA scheme. Tissue material underwent an internal validation phase followed by an external testing phase. The internal validation phase served as a cross-validation step conducted by panel institutes. In the external testing phase, the number of participating institutes in the RET point mutation sub-scheme, RET fusion (ISH) sub-scheme, and RET fusion (NGS) sub-scheme was 32, 24, and 38, respectively. The reported success rates for external testing were 96.0%, 89.5%, and 93.5% for the RET point mutation, the ISH RET fusion, and the NGS RET fusion EQA sub-schemes, respectively. These findings confirm the reliability of the NGS method in detecting RET alterations and align with current screening recommendations. Overall, 31 institutes were certified for RET point mutation testing by NGS methods, 22 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by ISH, and 36 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by NGS methods. Results can be employed to inform real-world diagnostic decisions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant therapy has gained widespread acceptance as the standard modality for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical benefit of sleeve lobectomy (SL) or pneumonectomy (PN) following neoadjuvant therapy remains controversial. METHODS: The clinical and pathological characteristics of NSCLC patients who underwent SL or PN after neoadjuvant therapy at a high-volume single centre between December 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected. The SL group was matched 4:1 with the PN group by propensity score matching (PSM). The surgical outcomes were systematically collected and analysed. RESULTS: During a 5-year study period, the majority of patients (175 out of 215, 81.4%) underwent the SL procedure, while 40 patients (18.6%) underwent PN. Following PSM, the SL group exhibited lower postoperative arrythmia (4.8% vs 26.9%, P < 0.001), lower 30-day mortality (1.0% vs 7.7%, P = 0.046) and a shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (6.0 days vs 10.0 days, P < 0.001), compared to the PN group. In addition, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival (P = 0.977 and P = 0.913, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SL stands as a safe and feasible option for patients with centrally located NSCLC who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy, in comparison to PN. This finding suggests that SL remains the preferable choice when feasible in the context of the widespread utilization of neoadjuvant therapy.

Effects of brain radiotherapy strategies on survival in the era of MRI for patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the context of the widespread availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and aggressive salvage irradiation techniques, there has been controversy surrounding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. This study aimed to explore whether regular brain MRI plus salvage brain irradiation (SBI) is not inferior to PCI in patients with limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). METHODS: This real-world multicenter study, which was conducted between January 2014 and September 2020 at three general hospitals, involved patients with LS-SCLC who had a good response to initial chemoradiotherapy and no brain metastasis confirmed by MRI. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who did not receive PCI for various reasons but chose regular MRI surveillance and followed salvage brain irradiation (SBI) when brain metastasis was detected and patients who received PCI. RESULTS: 120 patients met the inclusion criteria. 55 patients received regular brain MRI plus SBI (SBI group) and 65 patients received PCI (PCI group). There was no statistically significant difference in median OS between the two groups (27.14 versus 33.00 months; P = 0.18). In the SBI group, 32 patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy and 23 patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy + simultaneous integrated boost. On multivariate analysis, only extracranial metastasis was independently associated with poor OS in the SBI group. CONCLUSION: The results of this real-world study showed that MRI surveillance plus SBI is not inferior to PCI in OS for LS-SCLC patients who had a good response to initial chemoradiotherapy.

Bone metastasis prediction in non-small-cell lung cancer: primary CT-based radiomics signature and clinical feature.

BACKGROUND: Radiomics provided opportunities to quantify the tumor phenotype non-invasively. This study extracted contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) radiomic signatures and evaluated clinical features of bone metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the combination of the revealed radiomics and clinical features, the predictive modeling on bone metastasis in NSCLC was established. METHODS: A total of 318 patients with NSCLC at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital was enrolled between January 2009 and December 2019, which included a feature-learning cohort (n = 223) and a validation cohort (n = 95). We trained a radiomics model in 318 CECT images from feature-learning cohort to extract the radiomics features of bone metastasis in NSCLC. The Kruskal-Wallis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) were used to select bone metastasis-related features and construct the CT radiomics score (Rad-score). Multivariate logistic regression was performed with the combination of the Rad-score and clinical data. A predictive nomogram was subsequently developed. RESULTS: Radiomics models using CECT scans were significant on bone metastasis prediction in NSCLC. Model performance was enhanced with each information into the model. The radiomics nomogram achieved an AUC of 0.745 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68,0.80) on predicting bone metastasis in the training set and an AUC of 0.808(95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71,0.88) in the validation set. CONCLUSION: The revealed invisible image features were of significance on guiding bone metastasis prediction in NSCLC. Based on the combination of the image features and clinical characteristics, the predictive nomogram was established. Such nomogram can be used for the auxiliary screening of bone metastasis in NSCLC.

Small cell lung cancer: emerging subtypes, signaling pathways, and therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recalcitrant cancer characterized by early metastasis, rapid tumor growth and poor prognosis. In recent decades, the epidemiology, initiation and mutation characteristics of SCLC, as well as abnormal signaling pathways contributing to its progression, have been widely studied. Despite extensive investigation, fewer drugs have been approved for SCLC. Recent advancements in multi-omics studies have revealed diverse classifications of SCLC that are featured by distinct characteristics and therapeutic vulnerabilities. With the accumulation of SCLC samples, different subtypes of SCLC and specific treatments for these subtypes were further explored. The identification of different molecular subtypes has opened up novel avenues for the treatment of SCLC; however, the inconsistent and uncertain classification of SCLC has hindered the translation from basic research to clinical applications. Therefore, a comprehensives review is essential to conclude these emerging subtypes and related drugs targeting specific therapeutic vulnerabilities within abnormal signaling pathways. In this current review, we summarized the epidemiology, risk factors, mutation characteristics of and classification, related molecular pathways and treatments for SCLC. We hope that this review will facilitate the translation of molecular subtyping of SCLC from theory to clinical application.

A Randomized, Multi-Center, Open Label Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy between Afatinib Monotherapy and Combination Therapy with HAD-B1 for the Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), poses a significant health challenge globally due to its high mortality. Afatinib, a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has shown superior efficacy over traditional chemotherapy in NSCLC treatment. However, issues like secondary resistance and adverse effects call for alternative therapies. HAD-B1, comprising 4 herbal medicines, has shown promise in lung cancer treatment in both preclinical and clinical settings. This study assesses the combination of HAD-B1 and Afatinib in advanced NSCLC patients to potentially improve outcomes by addressing the limitations of current EGFR-TKI therapies. METHOD: A randomized, open-label trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 with Afatinib in 90 EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC patients. Participants were divided into treatment and control groups, receiving Afatinib with or without HAD-B1. The study focused on the initial dose maintenance rate and disease control rate (DCR) of Afatinib, alongside secondary outcomes like survival rates and quality of life, under continuous safety monitoring. RESULTS: Among the 90 participants, no significant difference was found in initial dose maintenance (60.98% in the treatment group vs 52.50% in the control, P = .4414) or DCR (80.49% vs 90.00%, P = .2283). Secondary outcomes like PFS, TTP, and OS showed no notable differences. However, physical functioning significantly improved in the treatment group (P = .0475, PPS group). The control group experienced higher rates of adverse events of special interest and adverse drug reactions (P = .01), suggesting HAD-B1 with Afatinib might enhance physical function without increasing adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Combining HAD-B1 with Afatinib potentially improves quality of life and reduces adverse events in advanced NSCLC patients. Further research is necessary to confirm the long-term benefits of this combination therapy, aiming to advance NSCLC treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) of the Republic of Korea, https://cris.nih.go.kr/ (ID: KCT0005414).

Dynamics of peripheral blood inflammatory index predict tumor pathological response and survival among patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a multi-cohort retrospective study.

Background: Static tumor features before initiating anti-tumor treatment were insufficient to distinguish responding from non-responding tumors under the selective pressure of immuno-therapy. Herein we investigated the longitudinal dynamics of peripheral blood inflammatory indexes (dPBI) and its value in predicting major pathological response (MPR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A total of 147 patients with NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed as training cohort, and 26 NSCLC patients from a phase II trial were included as validation cohort. Peripheral blood inflammatory indexes were collected at baseline and as posttreatment status; their dynamics were calculated as their posttreatment values minus their baseline level. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was utilized to screen out predictors for MPR, and a MPR score was integrated. We constructed a model incorporating this MPR score and clinical predictors for predicting MPR and evaluated its predictive capacity via the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and calibration curves. Furthermore, we sought to interpret this MPR score in the context of micro-RNA transcriptomic analysis in plasma exosomes for 12 paired samples (baseline and posttreatment) obtained from the training cohort. Results: Longitudinal dynamics of monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-albumin ratio, and prognostic nutritional index were screened out as significant indicators for MPR and a MPR score was integrated, which was further identified as an independent predictor of MPR. Then, we constructed a predictive model incorporating MPR score, histology, and differentiated degree, which discriminated MPR and non-MPR patients well in both the training and validation cohorts with an AUC value of 0.803 and 0.817, respectively. Furthermore, micro-RNA transcriptomic analysis revealed the association between our MPR score and immune regulation pathways. A significantly better event-free survival was seen in subpopulations with a high MPR score. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that dPBI reflected responses to neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy for NSCLC. The MPR score, a non-invasive biomarker integrating their dynamics, captured the miRNA transcriptomic pattern in the tumor microenvironment and distinguished MPR from non-MPR for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, which could support the clinical decisions on the utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatments in NSCLC patients.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of recombinant human endostatin plus PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for EGFR/ALK-negative, advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of recombinant human endostatin (Rh-endostatin) plus programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on patients with EGFR/ALK-negative, advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients received Rh-endostatin plus PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy every three weeks for 4 to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. As of data cutoff (December 13, 2022), the median follow-up of 21.4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8.3-44.4 months). The median PFS and OS was 22.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.6-27.4) and 31.0 months (95% CI: 23.4-not evaluable [NE]), respectively. The ORR was 72.06% (95% CI: 59.85-82.27%), and DCR was 95.59% (95% CI: 87.64-99.08%). Patients with stage IIIB/IIIC NSCLC had significantly longer median PFS (23.4 vs. 13.2 months), longer median OS (not reached vs. 18.0 months), and higher ORR (89.2% vs. 51.6%) than those with stage IV NSCLC (all p ≤ 0.001). The ORR was higher in patients with high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score [TPS] ≥ 50%) than in those with low PD-L1 expression or positive PD-L1 expression (75% vs. 50%, p = 0.025). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and ≥ grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 16 (23.53%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Rh-endostatin combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment yielded favorable effectiveness with a manageable profile in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, representing a promising treatment modality.

Higher immune cell radiation dose is correlated with poor tumor control and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving postoperative radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC) has been shown to correlate with the overall survival (OS) of patients who receive definitive thoracic radiotherapy. However, the planning target volume (PTV) may be a confounding factor. We assessed the prognostic value of EDRIC for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) with homogeneous PTV. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC who underwent PORT between 2004 and 2019 were included. EDRIC was computed as a function of the number of radiation fractions and mean doses to the lungs, heart, and remaining body. The correlations between EDRIC and OS, disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox models. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess the survival difference between low- and high-EDRIC groups. RESULTS: In total, 345 patients were analyzed. The mean EDRIC was 6.26 Gy. Multivariate analysis showed that higher EDRIC was associated with worse outcomes in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.207, P = .007), DFS (HR 1.129, P = .015), LRFS (HR 1.211, P = .002), and DMFS (HR 1.131, P = .057). In the low- and high-EDRIC groups, the 3-year OS was 81.2% and 74.0%, DFS 39.8% and 35.0%, LRFS 70.4% and 60.5%, and DMFS 73.9% and 63.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EDRIC is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with NSCLC undergoing PORT. Higher doses of radiation to the immune system are associated with tumor progression and poor survival. Organs at risk for the immune system should be considered during radiotherapy planning.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastases harboring targetable mutations.

Background: Driver gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are prone to develop leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), leading to an extremely high mortality. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatments for patients with NSCLC and LM harboring targetable mutations. Methods: We retrospectively collected records of patients with NSCLC harboring targetable mutations and prescribed ICIs following the diagnosis of LM at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University. In addition, we reviewed relevant literature and enrolled patients who met the inclusion criteria. Clinical characteristics were statistically analyzed, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were employed to assess the median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). Results: A total of 37 patients with NSCLC harboring targetable mutations who received ICIs after LM diagnosis were included. The median age of the enrolled patients was 54 years (range, 33-70 years), and 62.2% were female. Following ICI administration, the intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and intracranial disease control rate (iDCR) for all enrolled patients were 18.9% and 62.2%, respectively. The mPFS of all patients was 2.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.166-2.834 months] and the mOS was 5.8 months (95% CI: 5.087-6.513 months). Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed a significant increase in mOS or individuals who had previously undergone cranial radiation therapy compared to those who had not. Furthermore, different histology molecular types were found to be potentially associated with survival time. Conclusions: Some patients with NSCLC harboring targetable gene mutations following LM diagnosis may benefit from ICI treatment with relatively good tolerance. However, further screening of the most suitable patient populations for ICIs is required.

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant lorlatinib in a patient with stage IIIA ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a case report.

Background: Given the promising efficacy of targeted therapies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring oncogenic drivers, its use in adjuvant and even neoadjuvant therapy is increasing. Lorlatinib is a potent brain-penetrating third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with broad ALK mutation coverage. Currently, there is a limited evidence regarding the efficacy of lorlatinib as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced NSCLC in the presence of ALK rearrangements. The aim of this case report is to describe a rare case of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant lorlatinib in a patient with stage IIIA ALK-positive NSCLC, providing evidence for neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Case Description: A 35-year-old male was pathologically diagnosed with locally advanced stage IIIA (cT2bN2M0) ALK-positive NSCLC. Clinically, the patient had pulmonary nodules in the left inferior lobe, which were enlarged progressively with follow-up, with the largest measuring approximately 4.6 cm × 2.8 cm by computed tomography (CT) scan and we found that the lymph nodes (stations 4L, 7, and 8) were invaded by metastasis. Following a 3-month neoadjuvant treatment with lorlatinib at 100 mg daily, his CT scan demonstrated a partial response (PR). This patient then underwent a left inferior lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLD) and mediastinal cyst resection via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Postoperative pathology revealed a pCR. This patient continued to receive lorlatinib and remained disease free at his 10-month follow-up. Conclusions: Herein we reported the case of a pCR in stage IIIA ALK-positive NSCLC patient treated with neoadjuvant lorlatinib. Our findings underscore the potential of lorlatinib as a neoadjuvant treatment for resectable ALK-positive NSCLC.

Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective real-world study.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide (PE) improved overall survival (OS) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). While the CASPIAN trial demonstrated the efficacy of durvalumab plus PE, the clinical trial results may not be representative of the general, real-world population because clinical trials often have strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. We herein report the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus PE in patients with ES-SCLC in real-world, clinical practice. Methods: The present, monocentric, retrospective study evaluated patients with ES-SCLC or recurrent, limited-stage SCLC who received durvalumab plus PE between September 2020 and February 2023. The efficacy and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. Results: The study included 40 patients, of whom 17 were elderly (age >70 years), and 15 had performance status (PS) 2 or 3. The median follow-up time was 13.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.0-22.2 months]. The objective response rate was 80.0% (95% CI: 63.1-91.6%), and the disease control rate was 88.6% (95% CI: 73.3-96.8%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.9-6.9), and the median OS was 25.4 months (95% CI: 4.6-46.2). Factors such as advanced age, poor PS, and presence of brain metastases were not associated with lower PFS and OS. Twenty-six patients (65.0%) experienced grade 3 or higher AEs, mainly hematological toxicity. AEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in three patients (8%). Conclusions: Durvalumab plus PE in patients with ES-SCLC showed good efficacy and safety according to our real-world data, suggesting that this treatment is well tolerated in clinical practice, even in elderly patients and those with poor PS.

Tumor cavitation in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving anti-angiogenic therapy with apatinib.

Background: Cavities have been reported in approximately 20% of lung cancer after anti-angiogenesis treatments. However, the effect of which on treatment outcomes remains unclear. This study sought to investigate the incidence and radiographic patterns of tumor cavitation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with apatinib, and its associations with patients' clinical characteristics and outcomes. Methods: A total of 300 patients with NSCLC treated with apatinib were retrospectively identified. Baseline and follow-up chest computed tomography scans were reviewed to identify tumor cavitation, and the subsequent filling-in of the cavitation. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors associated with tumor cavitation. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Of the 300 patients, 51 (17.0%) developed lung cavitation after initiating apatinib therapy. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that apatinib combination therapy (vs. apatinib monotherapy, odds ratio: 0.593, 95% confidence interval: 0.412-0.854, P=0.005) was significantly associated with tumor cavitation. Patients with tumor cavitation had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those without cavitation (8.2 vs. 5.2 months, P<0.01). Of the patients, 18 had cavity filling after progression, while 13 had persistent cavities after progression. The corresponding median PFS times were 11.9 and 3.2 months in patients with filled and persistent cavities after disease progression, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusions: Tumor cavitation occurred in 17% of the NSCLC patients treated with apatinib and was associated with better PFS. Patients who had cavities filled after progression had a better prognosis than those with persistent cavities.

Differential impact of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) on survival outcomes in early-stage lung squamous and adenocarcinoma based on tumor mutational burden (TMB).

Background: Molecular biomarkers are reshaping patient stratification and treatment decisions, yet their precise use and best implementation remain uncertain. Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), an area of increasing research interest with prognostic value across various conditions, lacks defined clinical relevance in certain non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtypes. Exploring the relationship between ITH and tumor mutational burden (TMB) is crucial, as their interplay might reveal distinct patient subgroups. This study evaluates how the ITH-TMB dynamic affects prognosis across the two main histological subtypes of NSCLC, squamous cell and adenocarcinoma, with a specific focus on early-stage cases to address their highly unmet clinical needs. Methods: We stratify a cohort of 741 early-stage NSCLC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) based on ITH and TMB and evaluate differences in clinical outcomes. Additionally, we compare driver mutations and the tumor microenvironment (TME) between high and low ITH groups. Results: In lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), high ITH predicts an extended progression-free survival (PFS) (median: 21 vs. 14 months, P=0.01), while in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), high ITH predicts a reduced PFS (median: 15 vs. 20 months, P=0.04). This relationship is driven by the low TMB subset of patients. Additionally, we found that CD8 T cells were enriched in better-performing subgroups, regardless of histologic subtype or ITH status. Conclusions: There are significant differences in clinical outcomes, driver mutations, and the TME between high and low ITH groups among early-stage NSCLC patients. These differences may have treatment implications, necessitating further validation in other NSCLC datasets.