Oral delivery of Sunitinib malate using carboxymethyl cellulose/poly(acrylic acid-itaconic acid)/Cloisite 30B nanocomposite hydrogel as a pH-responsive carrier.

This work aimed to fabricate a Cloisite 30B-incorporated carboxymethyl cellulose graft copolymer of acrylic acid and itaconic acid hydrogel (Hyd) via a free radical polymerization method for controlled release of Sunitinib malate anticancer drug. The synthesized samples were characterized by FTIR, XRD, TEM, and SEM-dot mapping analyses. The encapsulation efficiency of Hyd and Hyd/Cloisite 30B (6 wt%) was 81 and 93%, respectively, showing the effectiveness of Cloisite 30B in drug loading. An in vitro drug release study showed that drug release from all samples in a buffer solution with pH 7.4 was higher than in a buffer solution with pH 5.5. During 240 min, the cumulative drug release from Hyd/Cloisite 30B (94.97% at pH 7.4) is lower than Hyd (53.71% at pH 7.4). Also, drug-loaded Hyd/Cloisite 30B (6 wt%) demonstrated better antibacterial activity towards S. Aureus bacteria and E. Coli. High anticancer activity of Hyd/Cloisite 30B against MCF-7 human breast cancer cells was shown by the MTT assay, with a MCF-7 cell viability of 23.82 ± 1.23% after 72-hour incubation. Our results suggest that Hyd/Cloisite 30B could be used as a pH-controlled carrier to deliver anticancer Sunitinib malate.

Understanding Treatment Decisions and Management for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Hypothetical Case Studies: A Vodcast.

In recent years, the armamentarium of therapies for the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) has grown. Combination therapies, including immuno-oncology (IO) agents and tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs (IO-TKI)], and IO-IO combinations, are now approved for first-line treatment of aRCC. Decisions regarding the use of these combinations, IO-IO versus IO-TKI, can be challenging, as they have not been compared in a randomized trial; each of these combinations have been compared with sunitinib alone. In addition, patient-, disease-, and treatment-based factors must be evaluated in the decision-making process. More important is the consideration of patient management during treatment and optimal detection and management of toxicities to ensure continued benefit. In this vodcast, two experts in the field of kidney cancer will present case studies that represent typical patients seen in practice. The faculty will discuss treatment approaches, adverse event management, and which factors to consider during the treatment decision-making process. Viewers of the vodcast will get a better understanding of clinical trial outcomes related to an IO-TKI combination, such as axitinib plus pembrolizumab, that they can apply to their practice immediately. In addition, they will gain real-world insight into how experts approach the treatment of patients with aRCC and, more importantly, therapy management.

Real-world effectiveness of first- and second-line anti-angiogenesis therapy in RCC: analysis of a UK-based population.

Aim: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the seventh commonest cancer in the UK, where first-line (1L) sunitinib and second-line (2L) axitinib are treatment options.Methods: Retrospective, non-interventional data from the Christie NHS Foundation Trust (Manchester, UK). The primary end point was median progression-free survival (mPFS).Results: For 1L sunitinib (n = 622) and 2L axitinib (n = 121), mPFS (95% CI) was 8.4 (7.6, 9.9) and 6.2 (4.9, 9.3) months, respectively. In 1L, Karnofsky performance status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophils, hemoglobin, time from diagnosis to treatment and age were predictors (p < 0.05) of PFS. In 2L, LDH and platelets were predictors of PFS (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Sunitinib and axitinib were effective treatments for RCC. PFS predictors varied between 1L and 2L; LDH was a predictor for both.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04033991 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

[Box: see text].

Neoadjuvant sunitinib plus exemestane in post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer (SUT_EXE-08): a phase I/II trial.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer might be as effective as chemotherapy, with a better toxicity profile. Blocking a crucial process such as angiogenesis with sunitinib may have a synergistic effect with NET. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sunitinib plus exemestane in early-stage HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer. In this phase I/II study, postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- stage II-III breast cancer received neoadjuvant exemestane at conventional dose of 25mg plus sunitinib in a 3 + 3 design at 25mg (3/1weeks scheme) or 37.5mg continuous dose, for 6 months. Coprimary endpoints were the recommended dose of sunitinib combined with exemestane and objective response. Secondary endpoints included safety and biomarkers of early response. For 15 months, 18 patients were enrolled, 15 at sunitinib 25mg and 3 at 37.5mg. Median age was 73, 77% of patients had T2 tumors and 67% node-positive disease. The most common grade 2 toxicity was asthenia (44%), as was hypertension (22%) for grade 3. No grade 4-5 were reported. Twelve patients (66%) achieved an objective response. VEGFR-2 levels significantly decreased after one month of treatment. Differential gene expression analysis showed downregulation of ESR1, PGR and NAT1 in post-treatment samples and upregulation of EGFR, MYC, SFRP1, and FOXC1. PAM50 analysis on 83% of patients showed a prevalence of luminal A subtype, both in pre-treatment (63.6%) and post-treatment tumors (54.5%). Sunitinib plus exemestane was associated with substantial yet reversible toxicities, providing safety, efficacy and biological impact insights of combining an antiangiogenic drug with hormone therapy in early-stage breast cancer.Trial registration: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00931450. 02/07/2009.

Pan-Canadian consensus recommendations for GIST management in high- and low-throughput centres across Canada.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumours that originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal. GISTs are mainly driven by gain-of-function mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for localized tumours and all currently approved medical GIST treatments are based on orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Recent discoveries in the molecular and clinical features of GISTs have greatly impacted GIST management. Due to the provincially rather than nationally administered Canadian healthcare system, there have been inconsistencies in the treatment of GISTs across the country. Therefore, guidance on the latest knowledge, clinical management and treatment of GIST is needed to standardize the approach to GIST management nationwide. To establish pan-Canadian guidance, provide up-to-date data and harmonize the clinical practice of GIST management in high- and low-throughput centres across Canada; a panel of 20 physicians with extensive clinical experience in GIST management reviewed relevant literature. This included radiologists, pathologists, interventional radiologists, surgeons and medical oncologists across Canada. The structured literature focused on seven key domains: molecular profiling, radiological techniques/reporting, targeted localized therapy, intricacies of systemic treatments, emerging tests, multidisciplinary care and patient advocacy. This literature review, along with clinical expertise and opinion, was used to develop this concise and clinically relevant consensus paper to harmonize the knowledge and clinical practice on GIST management across Canada. The content presented here will help guide healthcare providers, especially in Canada, in terms of approaching and managing GIST.

Sunitinib in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma with Favorable Risk: Be Aware of PD-L1 Expression.

The treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has advanced significantly with first-line immunotargeted therapy combinations. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the cohort of patients with favorable risk and some oncologists continue to use sunitinib in these patients. PD-L1 expression has emerged as a negative prognostic factor in RCC, particularly in sunitinib-treated patients, where higher PD-L1 levels are linked to worse outcomes. This article discusses the potential risks associated with the use of sunitinib in PD-L1-positive patients.

Effect of isavuconazole on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its mechanism.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib, a newly developed multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has become a common therapeutic option for managing advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Examining the mechanism underlying the interaction between sunitinib and isavuconazole was the aim of this effort. METHODS: The concentrations of sunitinib and its primary metabolite, N-desethyl sunitinib, were analyzed and quantified using ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Our study evaluated the potential interaction between isavuconazole and sunitinib using rat liver microsomes (RLM), human liver microsomes (HLM), and in vivo rat models. For the in vivo study, two groups (n = 5) of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly allocated to receive sunitinib either with or without co-administration of isavuconazole. Additionally, the effects of isavuconazole on the metabolic stability of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib were studied in RLM in vitro. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated that in RLM, isavuconazole exhibited a mixed non-competitive and competitive inhibition mechanism, with an IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) value of 1.33 µM. Meanwhile, in HLM, isavuconazole demonstrated a competitive inhibition mechanism, with an IC50 of 5.30 µM. In vivo studies showed that the presence of isavuconazole significantly increased the pharmacokinetic characteristics of sunitinib, with the AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞), and Tmax rising to approximately 211.38%, 203.92%, and 288.89%, respectively, in contrast to the control group (5 mg/kg sunitinib alone). The pharmacokinetic characteristics of the metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib in the presence of isavuconazole remained largely unchanged compared to the control group. Furthermore, in vitro metabolic stability experiments revealed that isavuconazole inhibited the metabolic processing of both sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Isavuconazole had a major impact on sunitinib metabolism, providing fundamental information for the precise therapeutic administration of sunitinib.

TRIB3 knockdown increases the sensitivity of clear cell renal cell carcinoma to sunitinib by inducing ferroptosis.

Sunitinib resistance presents a significant challenge in the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The role of TRIB3, a newly identified oncogene, in tumor drug resistance has been widely studied. However, the mechanism by which TRIB3 contributes to sunitinib resistance in ccRCC has not been previously explored. This study aimed to investigate the mechanism through which TRIB3 regulates ferroptosis to increase the susceptibility of ccRCC to sunitinib treatment. Bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation revealed that TRIB3 is significantly upregulated in ccRCC tissues and is associated with poor prognosis. Knockdown of TRIB3 using siRNA transfection inhibited the proliferation and migration of ccRCC cells and induced ferroptosis. Following sunitinib treatment, TRIB3 knockdown increased cell sensitivity to sunitinib, enhanced the suppressive impact of sunitinib, and augmented sunitinib-induced ferroptosis. This study demonstrated that TRIB3 knockdown induces ferroptosis by targeting the SLC7A11/GPX4 pathway and enhances therapeutic efficacy of sunitinib for ccRCC, providing new insights and potential strategies to overcome the challenge of sunitinib resistance in ccRCC.

O-GlcNAcylation regulation of RIPK1-dependent apoptosis dictates sensitivity to sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma.

Receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) has emerged as a key regulatory molecule that influences the balance between cell death and cell survival. Under external stress, RIPK1 determines whether a cell undergoes RIPK-dependent apoptosis (RDA) or survives by activating NF-κB signaling. However, the role and mechanisms of RIPK1 on sunitinib sensitivity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain elusive. In this study, we demonstrated that the O-linked ß-N-acetylglucosamine modification (O-GlcNAcylation) of RIPK1 induces sunitinib resistance in RCC by inhibiting RDA. O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) specifically interacts with RIPK1 through its tetratricopeptide repeats (TPR) domain and facilitates RIPK1 O-GlcNAcylation. The O-GlcNAcylation of RIPK1 at Ser331, Ser440 and Ser669 regulates RIPK1 ubiquitination and the formation of the RIPK1/FADD/Caspase-8 complex, thereby inhibiting sunitinib-induced RDA in RCC. Site-specific depletion of O-GlcNAcylation on RIPK1 affects the formation of the RIPK1/FADD/Caspase 8 complex, leading to increased sunitinib sensitivity in RCC. Our data highlight the significance of aberrant RIPK1 O-GlcNAcylation in the development of sunitinib resistance and indicate that targeting RIPK1 O-GlcNAcylation could be a promising therapeutic strategy for RCC.

Temporary treatment cessation compared with continuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for adults with renal cancer: the STAR non-inferiority RCT.

Background: There is interest in using treatment breaks in oncology, to reduce toxicity without compromising efficacy. Trial design: A Phase II/III multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial assessing treatment breaks in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, starting tyrosine kinase inhibitor as first-line treatment at United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals. Interventions: At trial entry, patients were randomised (1 : 1) to a drug-free interval strategy or a conventional continuation strategy. After 24 weeks of treatment with sunitinib/pazopanib, drug-free interval strategy patients took up a treatment break until disease progression with additional breaks dependent on disease response and patient choice. Conventional continuation strategy patients continued on treatment. Both trial strategies continued until treatment intolerance, disease progression on treatment, withdrawal or death. Objective: To determine if a drug-free interval strategy is non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy in terms of the co-primary outcomes of overall survival and quality-adjusted life-years. Co-primary outcomes: For non-inferiority to be concluded, a margin of ≤ 7.5% in overall survival and ≤ 10% in quality-adjusted life-years was required in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. This equated to the 95% confidence interval of the estimates being above 0.812 and -0.156, respectively. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated using the utility index of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions questionnaire. Results: Nine hundred and twenty patients were randomised (461 conventional continuation strategy vs. 459 drug-free interval strategy) from 13 January 2012 to 12 September 2017. Trial treatment and follow-up stopped on 31 December 2020. Four hundred and eighty-eight (53.0%) patients [240 (52.1%) vs. 248 (54.0%)] continued on trial post week 24. The median treatment-break length was 87 days. Nine hundred and nineteen patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (461 vs. 458) and 871 patients in the per-protocol analysis (453 vs. 418). For overall survival, non-inferiority was concluded in the intention-to-treat analysis but not in the per-protocol analysis [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) intention to treat 0.97 (0.83 to 1.12); per-protocol 0.94 (0.80 to 1.09) non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval ≥ 0.812, intention to treat: 0.83 > 0.812 non-inferior, per-protocol: 0.80 < 0.812 not non-inferior]. Therefore, a drug-free interval strategy was not concluded to be non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy in terms of overall survival. For quality-adjusted life-years, non-inferiority was concluded in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses [marginal effect (95% confidence interval) intention to treat -0.05 (-0.15 to 0.05); per-protocol 0.04 (-0.14 to 0.21) non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval ≥ -0.156]. Therefore, a drug-free interval strategy was concluded to be non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy in terms of quality-adjusted life-years. Limitations: The main limitation of the study is the fewer than expected overall survival events, resulting in lower power for the non-inferiority comparison. Future work: Future studies should investigate treatment breaks with more contemporary treatments for renal cell carcinoma. Conclusions: Non-inferiority was shown for the quality-adjusted life-year end point but not for overall survival as pre-defined. Nevertheless, despite not meeting the primary end point of non-inferiority as per protocol, the study suggested that a treatment-break strategy may not meaningfully reduce life expectancy, does not reduce quality of life and has economic benefits. Although the treating clinicians' perspectives were not formally collected, the fact that clinicians recruited a large number of patients over a long period suggests support for the study and provides clear evidence that a treatment-break strategy for patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is feasible. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN06473203. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (NIHR award ref: 09/91/21) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 45. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Treatment breaks in cancer are of significant interest to patients and health professionals. Renal cell carcinoma is the most common type of kidney cancer. Sunitinib and pazopanib are both targeted treatments. They were commonly used to treat advanced kidney cancer but often cause side effects, sometimes requiring use of a reduced dose or even stopping treatment. The STAR trial was designed to see whether planned treatment breaks made patients with advanced kidney cancer being treated with sunitinib and pazopanib feel better, without substantially affecting how well the treatment worked. After 24 weeks of treatment, patients took sunitinib and pazopanib either as they normally would or in the alternative way with planned treatment breaks. Treating patients in this way was continued until drug-related side effects stopped treatment, patients' disease worsened while taking treatment or the patient died. The trial compared how well the different treatment strategies worked in terms of how long patients lived and their quality of life over that time. This trial is the largest United Kingdom trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patients took part from 60 United Kingdom centres between 2012 and 2017. It was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme and run by the Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit. In total, 920 patients took part. Four hundred and sixty-one patients were allocated to continue treatment and 459 were allocated to start at least one treatment break. Treatment breaks lasted on average 87 days. The length of time patients lived in both arms of the trial appeared similar, but this cannot be concluded due to insufficient information. Being allocated to have treatment breaks rather than continuing treatment did not negatively impact a patient's quality of life. Additionally, allocating patients to have treatment breaks was shown to have significant cost savings compared to just continuing treatment. Importantly planned treatment breaks were shown to be feasible.

Comparison of the efficacy of sunitinib and pazopanib in patients with advanced non-clear renal cell carcinoma.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease group, accounting for approximately 25% of all RCC cases. Due to its rarity and especially heterogeneity, phase III trial data is limited and treatment options generally follow those of clear cell RCC. In the literature, there exists a number of studies with sunitinib, cabozantinib, and everolimus, but data on the efficacy of pazopanib are limited. Our aim in this study was to compare the efficacy of pazopanib and sunitinib, in a multicenter retrospective cohort of non-ccRCC patients. Our study included patients diagnosed with non-ccRCC who received pazopanib or sunitinib treatment as first-line therapy from 22 tertiary hospitals. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rates of pazopanib and sunitinib treatments. Additionally, we investigated prognostic factors in non-ccRCC. PFS and response rates of sunitinib and pazopanib were found to be similar, while a numerical difference was observed in OS. Being 65 years and older, being in the intermediate or poor risk group according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, having liver metastases, presence of a sarcomatoid component, and having de novo metastatic disease were found to be significantly associated with shorter PFS. Pazopanib treatment appears to have similar efficacy in the treatment of non-ccRCC compared to sunitinib. Though randomized controlled trials are lacking and will probably be never be available, we suggest that pazopanib could be a preferred agent like sunitinib and cabozantinib.

Pazopanib and sunitinib treatments show similar progression free survival, overall survival and objective response rate.IMDC risk group, liver metastasis, sarcomatoid component and de novo metastatic disease were determined as prognostic factors.

Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 (FGF2) Activates Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Signaling in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): An Autocrine Mechanism Contributing to Imatinib Mesylate (IM) Resistance.

We showed previously that the autocrine activation of the FGFR-mediated pathway in GIST lacking secondary KIT mutations was a result of the inhibition of KIT signaling. We show here that the FGF2/FGFR pathway regulates VEGF-A/VEGFR signaling in IM-resistant GIST cells. Indeed, recombinant FGF2 increased the production of VEGF-A by IM-naive and resistant GIST cells. VEGF-A production was also increased in KIT-inhibited GIST, whereas the neutralization of FGF2 by anti-FGF2 mAb attenuated VEGFR signaling. Of note, BGJ 398, pan FGFR inhibitor, effectively and time-dependently inhibited VEGFR signaling in IM-resistant GIST T-1R cells, thereby revealing the regulatory role of the FGFR pathway in VEGFR signaling for this particular GIST cell line. This also resulted in significant synergy between BGJ 398 and VEGFR inhibitors (i.e., sunitinib and regorafenib) by enhancing their pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative activities. The high potency of the combined use of VEGFR and FGFR inhibitors in IM-resistant GISTs was revealed by the impressive synergy scores observed for regorafenib or sunitinib and BGJ 398. Moreover, FGFR1/2 and VEGFR1/2 were co-localized in IM-resistant GIST T-1R cells, and the direct interaction between the aforementioned RTKs was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation. In contrast, IM-resistant GIST 430 cells expressed lower basal levels of FGF2 and VEGF-A. Despite the increased expression VEGFR1 and FGFR1/2 in GIST 430 cells, these RTKs were not co-localized and co-immunoprecipitated. Moreover, no synergy between FGFR and VEGFR inhibitors was observed for the IM-resistant GIST 430 cell line. Collectively, the dual targeting of FGFR and VEGFR pathways in IM-resistant GISTs is not limited to the synergistic anti-angiogenic treatment effects. The dual inhibition of FGFR and VEGFR pathways in IM-resistant GISTs potentiates the proapoptotic and anti-proliferative activities of the corresponding RTKi. Mechanistically, the FGF2-induced activation of the FGFR pathway turns on VEGFR signaling via the overproduction of VEGF-A, induces the interaction between FGFR1/2 and VEGFR1, and thereby renders cancer cells highly sensitive to the dual inhibition of the aforementioned RTKs. Thus, our data uncovers the novel mechanism of the cross-talk between the aforementioned RTKs in IM-resistant GISTs lacking secondary KIT mutations and suggests that the dual blockade of FGFR and VEGFR signaling might be an effective treatment strategy for patients with GIST-acquired IM resistance via KIT-independent mechanisms.

The CYP3A inducer dexamethasone affects the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib by accelerating its metabolism in rats.

Sunitinib, a novel anti-tumor small molecule targeting VEGFR, is prescribed for advanced RCC and GISTs. Sunitinib is primarily metabolized by the CYP3A enzyme. It is well-known that dexamethasone serves as a potent inducer of this enzyme system. Nonetheless, the effect of dexamethasone on sunitinib metabolism remains unclear. This study examined the effect of dexamethasone on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib in rats. The plasma levels of both compounds were measured using UHPLC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters and metabolite ratio values were calculated. Compare to control group, the low-dose dexamethasone group and high-dose dexamethasone group decreased the AUC(0-t) values of sunitinib by 47 % and 45 %, respectively. Meanwhile, the AUC(0-t) values of N-desethyl sunitinib were increased by 2.2-fold and 2.4-fold in low-dose dexamethasone group and high-dose dexamethasone group, respectively. The CL values for sunitinib were both approximately 45 % higher in the two dexamethasone groups. Remarkably, metabolite ratio values increased over 5-fold in both low-dose dexamethasone group and high-dose dexamethasone group, indicating a significant enhancement of sunitinib metabolism by dexamethasone. Moreover, the total levels of sunitinib and its metabolite are also significantly increased. The impact of interactions on sunitinib metabolism, as observed with CYP3A inducers such as dexamethasone, is a crucial consideration for clinical practice. To optimize the dosage and prevent adverse drug events, therapeutic drug monitoring can be employed to avoid the toxicity from such interactions.

The INSIGHT study: a randomized, Phase III study of ripretinib versus sunitinib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations.

Somatic KIT activating mutations drive most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Disease progression eventually develops with first-line imatinib, commonly due to KIT secondary mutations, and different kinase inhibitors have various levels of treatment efficacy dependent on specific acquired resistance mutations. Ripretinib is a broad-spectrum switch-control KIT/PDGFRA tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with advanced GIST who received prior treatment with three or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Exploratory baseline circulating tumor DNA analysis from the second-line INTRIGUE trial determined that patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib harboring primary KIT exon 11 mutations and secondary resistance mutations restricted to KIT exons 17/18 had greater clinical benefit with ripretinib versus sunitinib. We describe the rationale and design of INSIGHT (NCT05734105), an ongoing Phase III open-label study of ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib exclusively harboring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations detected by circulating tumor DNA.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05734105 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is rare, but it is the most common mesenchymal tumor (a type of tumor that develops from cells which give rise to soft tissues) of the gastrointestinal tract. The primary treatment for advanced GIST is medication that targets the abnormal mechanisms in cancer cells in order to block tumor growth and spread. Ripretinib is an inhibitor of a protein known as KIT, which is a member of the tyrosine kinase protein family and is involved in the growth of GIST. In a Phase III clinical trial called INTRIGUE, the effects of ripretinib and another receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, sunitinib, were compared in patients with advanced GIST previously treated with the drug imatinib. An exploratory analysis from the INTRIGUE trial that characterized baseline circulating tumor DNA in the blood showed a greater clinical benefit with ripretinib versus sunitinib in patients with gene mutations solely occurring in KIT exon 11 + 17 and/or 18 (exon 11 + 17/18). This article describes the rationale and design for a Phase III clinical trial called INSIGHT that will evaluate the benefit of ripretinib compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced GIST whose tumors have mutations in KIT exon 11 and KIT exon 17 and/or 18. Patients will receive ripretinib or sunitinib in 6-week cycles, and investigators will assess survival without cancer progression as the primary outcome, and overall survival, and response of the tumor to these two drugs as secondary outcomes.

Sunitinib alleviates hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury by inhibiting the JAK2/STAT pathway and promoting the M2 polarization of macrophages.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is a common liver surgery complication. This study aims to explore the effect and potential mechanism of Sunitinib - a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor - on hepatic IRI. METHODS: We established a hepatic IRI model using C57BL/6 mice, and integrated 40 mg/kg of Sunitinib, solely or combined with 100 µg/kg of coumermycin A1 (C-A1), in the treatment strategy. H&E staining, TUNEL assay, and detection of serum ALT and AST activities were used to assess liver damage. Further, ELISA kits and Western Blots were utilized to determine IL-1ß, TNF-α, IL-6, CXCL10, and CXCL2 levels. Primary macrophages, once isolated, were cultured in vitro with either 2 nM of Sunitinib, or Sunitinib in conjunction with 1 µM of C-A1, to gauge their influence on macrophage polarization. qPCR and Western blot were conducted to examine the level of p-STAT1/STAT1, p-STAT3/STAT3, p-JAK2/JAK2, and M1/M2 polarization markers. To quantify immune cell infiltration, we applied Immunofluorescence. RESULTS: Sunitinib pretreatment significantly alleviated liver injury and reduced p-STAT1/STAT1, p-STAT3/STAT3, p-JAK2/JAK2 levels. In vitro, Sunitinib treatment curbed M1 polarization induced by LPS + IFN-γ and bolstered M2 polarization triggered by IL-4. C-A1 application upregulated JAK2/STAT pathway phosphorylation and promoted LPS + IFN-γ-induced M1 polarization, which was reversed by Sunitinib treatment. In IL-4-stimulated macrophages, application of C-A1 activated the JAK2/STAT pathway and decreased M2-type macrophages, which was reversed by Sunitinib treatment either. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib is capable of guiding the polarization of macrophages toward an M2-type phenotype via the inhibition of the JAK2/STAT pathway, thereby exerting a protective effect on hepatic IRI.

Predicting Survival of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Treated with VEGFR-TKI-Based Sequential Therapy.

(1) Objective: To develop a clinically useful nomogram that may provide a more individualized and accurate estimation of cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with clear-cell (CC) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nephrectomy and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI)-based sequential therapy. (2) Methods: A prospectively maintained database of 145 patients with mRCC treated between 2008 and 2018 was analyzed to predict the CSS of patients receiving sunitinib and second- and third-line therapies according to current standards of practice. A nomogram based on four independent clinical predictors (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium score, the Morphology, Attenuation, Size and Structure criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response criteria) was calculated. The corresponding 1- to 10-year CSS probabilities were then determined from the nomogram. (3) Results: The median age was 60 years (95% CI 57.9-61.4). The disease was metastatic at diagnosis in 59 (40.7%), and 86 (59.3%) developed metastasis during follow-up. Patients were followed for a median 48 (IQR 72; 95% CI 56-75.7) months after first-line VEGFR-TKI initiation. The concordance probability estimator value for the nomogram is 0.778 ± 0.02 (mean ± SE). (4) Conclusions: A nomogram to predict CSS in patients with CC mRCC that incorporates patient status, clinical risk classification and response criteria to first-line VEGFR-TKI at 3 months is presented. This new tool may be useful to clinicians assessing the risk and prognosis of patients with mRCC.

Glassy carbon electrodes modified with graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets and CoNiO2 bimetallic oxide nanoparticles as electrochemical sensor for Sunitinib detection in human fluid matrices and pharmaceutical samples.

A sophisticated electrochemical sensor is presented employing a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) modified with a novel composite of synthesized graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) and CoNiO2 bimetallic oxide nanoparticles (g-C3N4/CoNiO2). The sensor's electrocatalytic capabilities for Sunitinib (SUNI) oxidation were demonstrated exceptional performance with a calculated detection limit (LOD) of 52.0 nM. The successful synthesis and integrity of the composite were confirmed through meticulous characterization using various techniques. FT-IR analysis affirmed the successful synthesis of g-C3N4/CoNiO2 by providing insights into its molecular structure. XRD, FE-SEM, SEM-EDX, and BET analyses collectively validated the material's structural integrity, surface morphology, and electrocatalytic performance. Optimization of key analytical parameters, such as loading volume, concentration, electrolyte solution type, and pH, enhanced the electrocatalytic sensing capabilities of g-C3N4/CoNiO2. The synergistic interaction between g-C3N4 and CoNiO2 bimetallic oxide nanoparticles executed the sensor highly effective in the electrical oxidation of SUNI. Across a concentration range of 0.1-83.8 µM SUNI, the anodic peak current exhibited a linear increase with good precision. Application of the newly developed g-C3N4/CoNiO2 system to detect SUNI in a variety of samples, including urine, human serum, and capsule dosage forms, obtained satisfactory recoveries ranging from 97.1 to 103.0%. This methodology offers a novel approach to underscore the potential of the developed sensor for applications in biological and pharmaceutical monitoring.

Sunitinib-induced endocapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis with IgA2 deposit in addition to thrombotic microangiopathy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is used as a second-line therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) resistant to imatinib. However, its impact on the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway can lead to significant toxicities, including hypertension and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). CASE PRESENTATION: This case report describes a unique instance of a patient with metastatic GIST who developed endocapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis (EPGN) with IgA2 deposits and TMA following sunitinib treatment. The patient presented with severe hypertension, nephrotic syndrome, and acute kidney injury. Renal biopsy confirmed the diagnosis, revealing IgA2 deposits, which are not commonly associated with TMA. Discontinuation of sunitinib led to a rapid improvement in renal function and proteinuria. The potential mechanisms underlying sunitinib-induced glomerular injury may involve the blockade of VEGFR-1, affecting immune cell recruitment and function, and the disruption of the nitric oxide and endothelin systems, leading to endothelial damage and immune dysregulation. Management of these toxicities requires a personalized approach, with options ranging from symptomatic relief to drug discontinuation. The use of endothelin receptor antagonists and other therapeutic alternatives for GIST management is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the complex interplay between the therapeutic effects of sunitinib and its potential renal and cardiovascular toxicities, emphasizing the need for close monitoring and effective management strategies to optimize patient outcomes.

The STELLAR trial: a phase II/III randomized trial of high-dose, intermittent sunitinib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Previously, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib failed to show clinical benefit in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Low intratumoural sunitinib accumulation in glioblastoma patients was reported as a possible explanation for the lack of therapeutic benefit. We designed a randomized phase II/III trial to evaluate whether a high-dose intermittent sunitinib schedule, aimed to increase intratumoural drug concentrations, would result in improved clinical benefit compared to standard treatment with lomustine. Patients with recurrent glioblastoma were randomized 1:1 to high-dose intermittent sunitinib 300 mg once weekly (Q1W, part 1) or 700 mg once every two weeks (Q2W, part 2) or lomustine. The primary end-point was progression-free survival. Based on the pre-planned interim analysis, the trial was terminated for futility after including 26 and 29 patients in parts 1 and 2. Median progression-free survival of sunitinib 300 mg Q1W was 1.5 months (95% CI 1.4-1.7) compared to 1.5 months (95% CI 1.4-1.6) in the lomustine arm (P = 0.59). Median progression-free survival of sunitinib 700 mg Q2W was 1.4 months (95% CI 1.2-1.6) versus 1.6 months (95% CI 1.3-1.8) for lomustine (P = 0.70). Adverse events (≥grade 3) were observed in 25%, 21% and 31% of patients treated with sunitinib 300 mg Q1W, sunitinib 700 mg Q2W and lomustine, respectively (P = 0.92). To conclude, high-dose intermittent sunitinib treatment failed to improve the outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma when compared to standard lomustine therapy. Since lomustine remains a poor standard treatment strategy for glioblastoma, innovative treatment strategies are urgently needed.