ABSTRACT
Standardised and universal perioperative endpoint reporting are the cornerstone for outcomes assessment, reliable clinical trials, and health services research. The Outcome4medicine initiative recently reported consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions, proposing a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions. In the same field, the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine - Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) group recently proposed standardised and valid measures of mortality and morbidity, derived from a three-stage Delphi process. Here a core group of the Outcome4medicine conference discusses how these two initiatives are aligned and emphasises the importance of standardised outcome assessment by integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders.
Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Perioperative Care , Humans , Quality Improvement , Delphi Technique , Treatment Outcome , Research DesignABSTRACT
Computer-aided surgical planning has been widely used to increase the safety and predictability of surgery. The validation of the target of surgical planning to surgical outcomes on a patient-specific model is an important issue. The aim of this research was to develop a robust superposition method to assess the deviation of planning and outcome by using the symmetrical characteristic of the affected target. The optimal symmetry plane (OSP) of an object is usually used to evaluate the degree of symmetry of an object. We proposed a refined OSP-based contouring method to transfer a complex three-dimensional superposition operation into two dimensions. We compared the typical iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm with the refined OSP-based contouring method and examined the differences between them. The results using the OSP-based method were much better than the traditional method. As for processing time, the OSP-based contouring method was 11 times faster than the ICP method overall. The proposed method was not affected by the metallic artifacts from medical imaging or geometric changes due to surgical intervention. This technique can be applied for post-operative assessment, such as quantifying the differences between surgical targets and outcomes as well as performing long-term medical follow-up.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare simple enucleation (SE) and standard partial nephrectomy (SPN) in terms of surgical results in a multicenter dataset (RECORd Project). MATERIALS AND METHODS: patients treated with nephron sparing surgery (NSS) for clinical T1 renal tumors between January 2009 and January 2011 were evaluated. Overall, 198 patients who underwent SE were retrospectively matched to 198 patients who underwent SPN. The SPN and SE groups were compared regarding intraoperative, early post-operative and pathologic outcome variables. Multivariable analysis was applied to analyze predictors of positive surgical margin (PSM) status. RESULTS: SE was associated with similar WIT (18 vs 17.8 min), lower intraoperative blood loss (177 vs 221 cc, p = 0.02) and shorter operative time (121 vs 147 min; p < 0.0001). Surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open), tumor size and type of indication (elective/relative vs absolute) were associated with WIT >20 min. The incidence of PSM was significantly lower in patients treated with SE (1.4% vs 6.9%; p = 0.02). At multivariable analysis, PSM was related to the surgical technique, with a 4.7-fold increased risk of PSM for SPN compared to SE. The incidence of overall, medical and surgical complications was similar between SE and SPN. CONCLUSIONS: Type of NSS technique (SE vs SPN) adopted has a negligible impact on WIT and postoperative morbidity but SE seems protective against PSM occurrence.