ABSTRACT
Background: Hereditary angioedema is a rare hereditary and potentially life-threatening disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of cutaneous and submucosal swelling. In spite of the advances made in terms of pathophysiology, underlying mechanisms are not fully clear and this, in turn, hinders the development of effective therapies. Currently, on demand treatment is considered first-class, with few cost-effective, long-term prophylactic options. Case presentation: Here we describe the case of a 34-year-old man diagnosed with hereditary angioedema at the age of 10, who used to suffer several angioedema attacks per month. He was given prophylactic treatment with antifibrinolytic agents and androgens without improvement. Moreover, he was treated with plasma-derived C1-INH concentrate or icatibant for on-demand treatment of moderate and severe angioedema attacks. At the age of 33, after suffering sudden vision loss and lower limb paresthesia, he was studied and diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Teriflunomide was administered at a dosage of 14 mg/day. Angioedema attacks disappeared 40 days after starting treatment. Conclusion: Thus, we suggest considering the pathophysiologic mechanisms on which teriflunomide could be active and consider this drug carefully as an option for prophylaxis purposes. Yet, its effectiveness on this condition should be further studied. LEARNING POINTS: Underlying mechanisms in hereditary angioedema lack clarity and hence hinder the development of effective therapies.On-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema is considered first class, with few cost-effective, long-term prophylactic options.The mechanisms of action and effectiveness of teriflunomide on hereditary angioedema should be studied further.
ABSTRACT
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Teriflunomide is an oral medication approved for the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis. The primary effect of teriflunomide is to reduce de novo pyrimidine synthesis by inhibiting mitochondrial dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, thereby causing cell-cycle arrest. We aimed to investigate the occurrence of peripheral neuropathy, a rare side effect of teriflunomide, in patients receiving teriflunomide. METHODS: Multiple sclerosis patients receiving teriflunomide (n=42) or other disease modifying therapies (n=18) and healthy controls (n=25) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study between January 2020 and 2021. The mean duration of teriflunomide treatment was 26 months (ranging from 6 to 54 months). All participants underwent neurological examination and nerve conduction studies of tibial, peroneal, sural, superficial peroneal, median, and ulnar nerves by using surface recording bar and bipolar stimulating electrodes. RESULTS: The mean superficial peroneal nerve distal latency and conduction velocity were significantly slower, and the mean superficial peroneal nerve action potential amplitude was lower in patients using teriflunomide (2.50 ms, p<0.001; 47.35 m/s, p=0.030; and 11.05 μV, p<0.001, respectively). The mean peroneal motor nerve distal latency was significantly longer and amplitude was lower in teriflunomide patients (3.68 ms, p<0.001, and 5.25 mV, p=0.009, respectively). During the study period, treatment switching to another disease-modifying therapy was planned in 10 patients, and all neuropathic complaints were reversed after switching. CONCLUSION: Teriflunomide has the potential to cause peripheral neuropathy. The awareness of peripheral neuropathy, questioning the symptoms, and if suspected, evaluation with electromyography and switching the therapy in patients under teriflunomide treatment are crucial.
ABSTRACT
We report COVID-19 presentation, course and outcomes in teriflunomide-treated MS patients in Argentina. METHODS: descriptive, retrospective, multicentre, study that included MS patients receiving teriflunomide who developed COVID-19, with clinical follow-up at reference MS centres, also listed in a nationwide registry. RESULTS: Eighteen MS patients on teriflunomide treatment, from eight MS centres developed COVID-19. The mean age was 41,2 years and 72% of them were female; 94% had diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS and 6% presented a radiologically isolated syndrome. Median EDSS was 2 (range 0-5.5). The average time on teriflunomide therapy was 3 years. COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed with nasal swab in 61%. None required hospitalization and they completely recovered from the acute-phase within 7-14 days. All the patients continued their teriflunomide therapy during COVID-19 course. No MS relapses occurred during or after COVID-19 course. CONCLUSION: Our report adds to the evidence that COVID-19 is mild in patients receiving teriflunomide therapy and that continuing with teriflunomide therapy during Sars-CoV-2 infection is safe and advisable for MS patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Multiple Sclerosis , Adult , COVID-19 Testing , Crotonates/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hydroxybutyrates , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/epidemiology , Nitriles , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Toluidines/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Introduction: Multiple sclerosis is a neurological condition that causes disabilities and is most common in young adults. It imposes high financial costs affecting the quality of life of patients, families, and society. It is critical to measure the budgetary impact of new technologies to treat this disease. Objective: The aim of the article is to estimate the budgetary impact of introducing alemtuzumab as an escalation therapy in patients diagnosed with Recurrent Remitting Multiple Sclerosis and treated in Quito, Ecuador. Materials and methods: A cohort of 85 patients receiving treatment with disease-modifying therapies was used, within a 5-year timeframe, between 2021 and 2025. The baseline scenario, including the percentages of administration of the different drugs, is compared with the alternative scenario, including alemtuzumab. The cost assessment included only direct medical resources. To obtain local resources for management of the disease, a neurologist and clinical expert who treats most of the patients in Quito was consulted. Results: Considering a cohort of 85 patients with active Recurrent Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, the average global budget impact in 5 years would be USD 10,603,230.00 in the base case and USD 9,995,817.00 in the alemtuzumab scenario. Conclusion: The inclusion of alemtuzumab as escalation therapy represents budgetary savings over the next 5 years (2021-2025).
ABSTRACT
Leflunomide modulates T-cell responses and induces a shift from the Th1 to Th2 subpopulation. This process results in a beneficial effect in diseases in which there is good evidence that T cells play a major role in both initiation and perpetuation of the inflammatory condition. Leflunomide has been successfully used for treating rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis for many years. The active metabolite of leflunomide is teriflunomide, which has been approved for treating multiple sclerosis. Teriflunomide, just like the mother drug, inhibits dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase and synthesis of pyrimidine. The present review presents and discusses the safety profiles of leflunomide and teriflunomide, two drugs that are indeed the same, considering that much can be learned from the reported side effects of both.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Crotonates/therapeutic use , Isoxazoles/therapeutic use , Toluidines/therapeutic use , Animals , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Autoimmune Diseases/physiopathology , Crotonates/adverse effects , Crotonates/pharmacology , Humans , Hydroxybutyrates , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Isoxazoles/adverse effects , Isoxazoles/pharmacology , Leflunomide , Nitriles , Pyrimidines/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Toluidines/adverse effects , Toluidines/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Tuberculosis continues to be a serious health problem worldwide. The disease continues to be underdiagnosed and not properly treated. In conditions that affect the immune system, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), latent tuberculosis may thrive and reactivate during the use of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drugs. Among the best treatment options for patients with latent or active tuberculosis who have MS are IFN-ß, glatiramer acetate and mitoxantrone. Drugs leading to a reduced number and/or function of lymphocytes should be avoided or used with caution. Tuberculosis must always be investigated in patients with MS and treated with rigor.