ABSTRACT
Background and aim: In patients with chronic hepatitis C, 8 weeks of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) treatment for chronic hepatitis (non-cirrhosis) and 12 weeks for cirrhosis have been approved in Japan. However, whether 8 weeks of treatment for cirrhosis may reduce treatment efficacy has not been adequately investigated. Methods: This prospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort study enrolled 1275 patients with chronic hepatitis C who received GLE/PIB therapy. The effect of liver fibrosis and treatment periods on the efficiency of GLE/PIB therapy was investigated. The primary endpoint was the sustained virological response (SVR) rate in patients with chronic hepatitis (non-cirrhosis) and cirrhosis. The association between treatment periods and liver fibrosis on the SVR after 12 weeks of treatment rate was investigated. Results: The SVR rates in patients with chronic hepatitis with 8 weeks of treatment, chronic hepatitis with 12 weeks of treatment, cirrhosis with 8 weeks of treatment, and cirrhosis with 12 weeks of treatment were 98.9% (800/809), 100% (87/87), 100% (166/166), and 99.1% (211/213), respectively, and were was not different among these groups (P = 0.4). Conclusion: GLE/PIB therapy for chronic hepatitis C had high efficacy regardless of liver fibrosis status and treatment periods. Periods of GLE/PIB therapy could be chosen with available modalities, and high SVR rates could be achieved regardless of the decision.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In recent years, therapeutic strategies based on tumour biology have increased significantly. We aimed to provide an overview of the recent changes in patient characteristics, treatment procedures and survival factors for two groups of patients: women younger than 35 years and women between 50 and 69 years. METHODS: We used data from the population-based Cancer Registry Magdeburg. Subjects included women with non-metastatic breast cancer treated between 2000 and 2015. We compared between two observation periods: 2000-2007 and 2008-2015. RESULTS: There was an increase in patient survival from the first to the second observation period. Tumour characteristics and treatment modalities changed, especially in the group of older patients. The proportion of prognostically more favourable tumour subtypes, such as Luminal A, increased significantly. Between 2008 and 2015, there were more hormone receptor-positive, lymph-node-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative and well-differentiated tumours. Surgical methods were associated with significantly reduced radicality, while the rate of neoadjuvant therapy increased in both groups. There was a decrease in cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluoruracil (CMF) and anthracycline therapies, but taxane-containing chemotherapy increased. While tamoxifen was used more frequently in younger patients in the later observation period, its use was reduced in older patients, superseded by aromatase inhibitors. Furthermore, the use of immune therapy increased. CONCLUSION: In both age groups, but primarily in older patients, there were significant changes in tumour biology and treatment options between the two observation periods. These changes have led to a continuous improvement in patient outcomes.