Vulval premalignant lesions: a review article.

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a noninvasive squamous lesion that is a precursor of vulvar squamous cell cancer. Currently, no screening tests are available for detecting VIN, and a biopsy is performed to confirm the clinical diagnosis. Despite sharing many risk factors with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, the diagnosis of VIN is poses challenges, contributing to its increasing prevalence. This study aimed to analyze the underlying risk factors that contribute to the development of VIN, identify specific populations at risk, and define appropriate treatment approaches. Differentiated VIN (dVIN) and usual VIN (uVIN) are the classifications of VIN. While dVIN is associated with other vulvar inflammatory disorders, such as lichen sclerosis, the more prevalent uVIN is associated with an underlying human papillomavirus infection. Patients with differentiated VIN have an increased risk of developing invasive malignancies. Few effective surveillance or management techniques exist for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, a preinvasive neoplasm of the vulva. For suspicious lesions, a thorough examination and focused biopsy are necessary. Depending on the specific needs of each patient, a combination of surgical and medical approaches can be used.

Improving indicator-condition guided testing for HIV in the hospital setting (PROTEST 2·0): A multicenter, interrupted time-series analysis.

Background: Indicator-condition (IC) guided HIV testing is a feasible and cost-effective strategy to identify undiagnosed people living with HIV (PLHIV), but remains insufficiently implemented. We aimed to promote IC-guided HIV testing in seven ICs. Methods: Relevant departments in five hospitals of the Amsterdam region participated. HIV testing among adult patients without known HIV infection but with an IC was assessed using electronic health records during pre-intervention (January 2015-June 2020) and intervention (July 2020-June 2021) periods. The multifaceted intervention included audit and feedback. The primary endpoint was HIV testing ≤3 months before or after IC diagnosis and the effect of the intervention was evaluated using segmented Poisson regression. Findings: Data from 7986 patients were included, of whom 6730 (84·3%) were diagnosed with an IC in the pre-intervention period and 1256 (15·7%) in the intervention period. The proportion HIV tested ≤3 months before or after IC diagnosis increased from 36.8% to 47.0% (adjusted risk ratio [RR]= 1.16, 95% CI=1.03-1.30, p=0.02). For individual ICs, we observed significant increases in HIV testing among patients with cervical cancer or intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (adjusted RR=3.62, 95% CI=1.93-6.79) and peripheral neuropathy (adjusted RR=2.27 95% CI=1.48-3.49), but not the other ICs. Eighteen of 3068 tested patients were HIV positive (0.6%). Interpretation: Overall IC-guided testing improved after the intervention, but not for all ICs. Variations in effect by IC may have been due to variations in implemented developments, but the effect of separate elements could not be assessed. Funding: HIV Transmission Elimination Amsterdam (H-TEAM) initiative, Aidsfonds (grant number: P-42702).

An investigation into human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for patients undergoing surgery for high-grade cervical or vulvar dysplasia.

Introduction: Eligibility for the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine now includes adults 27 through 45 years. It has not been reported how providers are addressing HPV vaccination in patients with existing preinvasive disease. Our objectives were to determine the rates at which vaccination is offered to and received by patients undergoing surgery for high-grade cervical or vulvar dysplasia. Materials and Methods: This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study including patients ages 18 through 45 years undergoing surgery for high-grade cervical or vulvar dysplasia from 10/2018 to 2/2020. Our primary outcome was the rate at which HPV vaccination was discussed at the pre- and/or post-operative visits. The secondary outcome was the rate of vaccine uptake in these individuals. Characteristics of those offered HPV vaccination were compared to those not offered vaccination. Results: Of the 115 patients included, 36 (31.3%) had HPV vaccination addressed in the perioperative setting. Thirty-two of these patients had never been vaccinated, and 21 of these (65.6%) went on to receive partial or complete HPV vaccination. Those in whom HPV vaccination was addressed were more likely to be under 27 years (RR 3.2; 95% CI 2.1-4.8) and less likely to be smokers (RR 0.5; 95% CI 0.2-0.9) or have prior excisional procedures (RR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.9). The absolute rate of discussing HPV vaccination with patients improved from 26.0% within six months of vaccine age eligibility expansion, to 35.4% after six months (P = 0.32). Conclusions: Providers did not consistently address HPV vaccination among patients being treated for high-grade cervical or vulvar dysplasia despite the potential benefits. However, a high proportion of these patients are amenable to vaccination. Quality improvement initiatives are warranted to increase the rate of HPV vaccine counseling in this context.

Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding the outcomes following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions. This is a common procedure among gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists, and a body of evidence is warranted to guide clinical care and future research. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the rate of wound complications following simple vulvar excision and to identify the risk factors for these outcomes. Our secondary objectives were to determine the rates of (1) positive margins and (2) occult carcinoma in the cases of vulvar dysplasia. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent simple vulvar excision procedures for suspected premalignant or benign lesions between June 2016 and February 2020. Our primary outcome was the rate of composite wound complications, including wound separation or breakdown, infection, or hematoma. Our secondary outcomes were the incidence of (1) margins positive for residual dysplasia and (2) occult minimally invasive carcinoma. The Fisher exact tests and chi-squared tests were used to compare the categorical variables and logistic regression models and independent student t tests were used for continuous variables, as appropriate. Multivariate stepwise selection and multiple logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk factors for complications and generate the odds ratios. RESULTS: Of the 338 patients included in the study, 143 (42.3%) experienced wound complication. Most of these complications were wound separation or breakdown (n=134, 39.6%), followed by infection (n=22, 6.5%), and hematoma (n=4, 1.2%). On multivariate analysis, the presence of high-grade vulvar dysplasia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.15), longer specimen diameter (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.05), and lesion location on the perineum (adjusted odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-3.66) were independent risk factors. With high-grade vulvar dysplasia, the rate of positive margins was 50.2% (114/227) and that of occult microinvasive carcinoma was 17.2% (39/227). Notably, the primary and secondary outcomes were similar among gynecologic oncologists and gynecologists. CONCLUSION: Wound complications following vulvar excision for nonmalignant lesions are common. Select groups may benefit from anticipatory counseling and future interventional studies to prevent complication. The incidence of positive surgical margins and occult minimally invasive carcinoma is also high, reflecting the challenging nature of treating vulvar disease.

Risk of cervical and vaginal dysplasia after surgery for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer: A 6 year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the frequency of abnormal surveillance cytology leading to high-grade dysplasia after surgical management for high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and vulvar cancer and to determine whether prior hysterectomy reduces this risk. METHODS: Women who underwent surgery for high-grade VIN or vulvar cancer between 2006 and 2014 were identified retrospectively. Patients who underwent prior hysterectomy for any indication were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify clinical correlates of abnormal cytology after surgical treatment for VIN and vulvar cancer. RESULTS: During a median follow-up for 72 months, 302 women underwent surveillance with cytologic screening after vulvar surgery including 99 (33%) women with prior hysterectomy. 75 (25%) women had abnormal cytology results. Of those, 47 (63%) were low-grade and 28 (37%) were high-grade, including 2 (3%) cases of invasive cancer. The rates of high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), or cancer were not significantly different despite prior hysterectomy (9% VAIN 2+, 7% CIN 2+). Multivariate analysis showed that correlates of high-grade cytology following treatment for VIN or vulvar cancer included non-white race [odds radio (OR) 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-7.8], prior abnormal cytology (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.6), and immunodeficiency (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3-8.8). Prior hysterectomy did not significantly decrease risk of high-grade cytology (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.5-1.6). CONCLUSIONS: Women treated surgically for VIN/vulvar cancer have an 8% risk of at least high-grade dysplasia from surveillance screening and prior hysterectomy does not mitigate the risk. Extrapolating from current guidelines, we recommend surveillance cytology screening at least 6-12 months after treatment.

Prevalence of high-grade anal dysplasia among women with high-grade lower genital tract dysplasia or cancer: Results of a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of high-grade anal dysplasia in women with high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma of the cervix, vagina or vulva. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, participants underwent anal cytology, anal HPV testing with Cervista HPV16/18 and high-resolution anoscopy (HRA). Patients with HSIL (high-grade squamous cell intraepithelial lesion) or greater on anal cytology or anal biopsy were referred to a colorectal surgery specialist for further evaluation. RESULTS: Seventy-five women were enrolled in the study, including 47 with cervical (cervix group), 10 with vaginal (vagina group), 15 with vulvar (vulva group), 1 with cervical and vaginal, and 2 with vulvar and vaginal disease. The median age in the cervix group (40 years (range 26-69)) was substantially younger than in the vagina (60 years (38-69)) and the vulva (59 years (36-75)) groups. Anal HSIL based on composite endpoints of the most severe cytology or histology result was diagnosed in 6 patients (8.0%). Anal cytology revealed HSIL in 2 (2.7%), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) in 12 (16.0%), low-grade squamous cell intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) in 2 (2.7%), and was normal in 59 (78.7%) patients. Anal HPV16/18 test was positive in 15 (20.0%), negative in 48 (64.0%) and insufficient in 12 (16.0%) patients. Of the 6 women with high-grade anal dysplasia, three (50%) had a positive anal HPV16/18 test. No case of anal cancer was observed. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the prevalence of anal HSIL is elevated among women with HPV-related lower genital tract dysplasia or cancer. To further support the inclusion of this high-risk group into screening guidelines for anal dysplasia, further studies are necessary to determine what screening strategy is suited to this population.

Human papillomavirus and nonhuman papillomavirus pathways to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: A review.

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is a rare tumor of the female genital tract. While previously considered a disease of older women, the epidemiologic landscape is changing with more young women diagnosed with VSCC and its precursor lesions. This may be secondary to the global increase in human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of the lower genital tract. While VSCC precursor lesions have been described for many years, the terminology, and thus the understanding and reproducibility of these lesions have been debated. In the most recent publication from the International Society of the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), there is a distinction between high-risk vulvar lesions associated with HPV infection (vulvar HSIL) and high-risk vulvar lesions that are not thought to be associated with HPV infection (differentiated VIN or dVIN). These precursors have different risk factors and thus affect different populations, leading to two separate pathways for developing VSCC. The HPV-related VSCC is likely to have a better prognosis than the non-HPV-related VSCC, as seen in other disease sites. Early-stage VSCC may be surgically treated with margin and node status affecting whether adjuvant radiation is recommended. Advanced stage VSCC may be unresectable, requiring neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Although VSCC is a rare disease, ongoing studies investigating the different pathways leading to carcinogenesis may increase the understanding of VSCC and improve therapeutic options for patients.