ABSTRACT
Mesenchymal stem cells are multipotent cells with a wide range of therapeutic applications, including, among others, tissue regeneration. This work aims to test the safety (EUC-MSC) of intra-articular administration of equine umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in young healthy dogs under field conditions following single and repeated administration. This was compared with the safety profile of allogenic canine adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (CAD-MSC) and placebo in order to define the safety of xenogeneic use of mesenchymal stem cells when administered intra-articular. Twenty-four police working dogs were randomized in three groups in a proportion 1:1:1. EUC-MSCs and CAD-MSCs were obtained from healthy donors and were manufactured following company SOPs and under GMP and GMP-like conditions, respectively, and compliant all necessary controls to ensure the quality of the treatment. The safety of the treatment was evaluated locally, systemically and immunologically. For this purpose, an orthopedic examination and Glasgow test for the assessment of pain in the infiltrated joint, blood tests, clinical examination and analysis of the humoral and cellular response to treatment were performed. No adverse events were detected following single and repeated MSC administration despite both equine and canine MSC generate antibody titres in the dogs. The intra-articular administration of equine umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in dogs has demonstrated to be safe.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It is commonly accepted that xenogeneic stem cell transplantation for tissue engineering is faced with host immune rejection. Using a rat critical-size mandibular defect model, this study examined whether the immune rejection can be evaded by diminishing T-cell immunity. METHODS: To examine donor cell survival and host immune reaction, pig bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) were labeled with CM-DiI, loaded onto gelatin sponge (5 × 106 cells/scaffold), and transplanted into 5-mm mandibular defects of immunocompetent and T cell-deficient athymic rats. To examine the effects of xenogeneic BM-MSCs on bone regeneration, athymic rats undergone the same surgeries were terminated at post-operative weeks 1, 3, and 6. Control rats underwent the same jaw surgery without BM-MSC transplantation. RESULTS: The density of CM-DiI-labeled BM-MSCs decreased with time in both strains of rats. Although it was substantially higher in athymic rats than in immunocompetent rats at post-operative day 1, by day 3-7 the density became comparable between the two strains of rats. Apoptosis reflected by cleaved Caspase-3 staining was low in both strains. Stronger infiltration of neutrophils, macrophages, B cells and CD8+ T cells was found in MSC-treated animals. In athymic rats, infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages was strong, but it occurred later than that in immunocompetent rats. While bone volume fraction significantly increased with time (P < .001), no difference was found between MSC-treated and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Even in hosts with deficient T-cell immunity, xenogeneic BM-MSC transplantation into mandibular critical-sized defects still faces challenges from host innate immunity, which compromises their regenerative efficacy.