ABSTRACT
We present gallbladder rupture following trauma. A 9-year-old boy admitted in 1.5 hours after injury. Considering clinical and ultrasound data, we diagnosed traumatic damage to the spleen and hemoperitoneum, biliary dyskinesia, cholestasis, sludge. Hemostatic therapy was carried out. After 3 days, signs of peritonitis appeared. Follow-up ultrasound revealed gallbladder enlargement with heterogeneous content, fluid in all parts of abdominal cavity. Intraoperatively, the gallbladder was enveloped in omentum soaked in bile. After mobilization of the gallbladder, we found longitudinal linear tear up to 3 cm clogged with omentum. Cholecystectomy was performed. Thus, we present a patient with combined injury and damage to the spleen. However, gallbladder wall thickening and heterogeneous content were interpreted as concomitant pathology. Delayed manifestation of peritonitis was due to gallbladder enveloped in omentum. The last one soaked in bile partially entered the gallbladder through perforation and prevented bile leakage into abdominal cavity. Timely diagnosis of gallbladder damage presents certain difficulties, especially in case of combined injury. Ultrasound signs of traumatic gallbladder rupture in this case were wall thickening, heterogeneous content and gradual gallbladder enlargement. It is necessary to analyze all organs at the damage site including computed tomography in patients with combined trauma.
Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy , Gallbladder , Ultrasonography , Humans , Male , Child , Gallbladder/injuries , Gallbladder/surgery , Cholecystectomy/methods , Rupture , Ultrasonography/methods , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Spleen/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Peritonitis/etiology , Peritonitis/diagnosis , Peritonitis/surgeryABSTRACT
Trauma is one of the leading causes of disability and mortality in working-age population. Abdominal injuries comprise 20-30% of traumas. Uncontrolled bleeding is the main cause of death in 30-40% of patients. Among abdominal organs, spleen is most often damaged due to fragile structure and subcostal localization. In the last two decades, therapeutic management has become preferable in patients with abdominal trauma and stable hemodynamic parameters. In addition to clinical examination, standard laboratory tests and ultrasound, as well as contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen should be included in diagnostic algorithm to identify all traumatic injuries and assess severity of abdominal damage. Development of interventional radiological technologies improved preservation of damaged organs. Endovascular embolization can be performed selectively according to indications (leakage, false aneurysm, arteriovenous anastomosis) and considered for severe damage to the liver and spleen, hemoperitoneum or severe polytrauma. Embolization is essential in complex treatment of traumatic vascular injuries of parenchymal abdominal organs. We reviewed modern principles and methods of intra-arterial embolization for the treatment of patients with traumatic injuries of the liver and spleen.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endovascular Procedures , Spleen , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Humans , Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Spleen/injuries , Spleen/blood supply , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Liver/injuries , Liver/blood supply , Liver/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Despite available armored personal protection in troops, the incidence of abdominal wounds in modern wars is 6.6-9.0%. Of these, penetrating abdominal injuries comprise 75-80%. Thoracoabdominal injuries occupy a special place with incidence up to 88%. We present the first case of the "Koblenz algorithm" in the treatment of a patient with mine explosion wound, combined injury of the head, limbs, thoracoabdominal trauma, widespread peritonitis, small intestinal obstruction and septic shock in a military hospital. This algorithm was implemented under import substitution considering the peculiarities of abdominal adhesive process in a patient with thoracoabdominal wound. This case demonstrates the advantage of this algorithm for patients with severe combined wounds of the chest and abdomen complicated by diffuse purulent peritonitis. Clinical status of these patients does not allow not only open laparostomy, but also "classical" redo laparotomies.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Algorithms , Hospitals, Military , Laparotomy , Thoracic Injuries , Humans , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Thoracic Injuries/surgery , Thoracic Injuries/diagnosis , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Male , Laparotomy/methods , Peritonitis/surgery , Peritonitis/etiology , Peritonitis/diagnosis , Blast Injuries/surgery , Blast Injuries/diagnosis , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Shock, Septic/etiology , Shock, Septic/surgery , Shock, Septic/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aims to discuss the characteristics, origins, degree of injury, results, reporting, and forensic medical aspects of penetrating abdominal injuries. METHODS: In this study, 28,619 cases who applied to the emergency department of Kutahya Health Sciences University Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 were reviewed. The forensic reports and medical documents of 85 cases with penetrating abdominal injuries were evaluated retrospectively, with the approval of the ethics committee. RESULTS: Among the patients included in the study, 87.1% were male and 12.9% were female. The mean age was found to be 31±13 years. When the origins of the cases were analyzed, 87.1% were found to have developed as a result of intentional injury. The incidents predominantly occurred between 20: 00 and 04: 00 hours. As a result of the examinations performed at the hospital after the incident, alcohol was detected in 36.5% of the cases, while 30.6% of the individuals did not consume alcohol. It was observed that 32.9% of the cases were not tested for alcohol. The most common injuries identified were sharp injuries, accounting for 69.4% of cases, and firearm injuries, comprising 27.1%. Organ damage was noted in 68.2% of the cases, with the small intestine being the most frequently damaged organ. The average number of wounds present was 3.6. Intra-abdominal hemorrhage was detected in 61.2% of the cases, and intra-abdominal artery injuries were found in 8.2%. The mortality rate for penetrating abdominal injuries was 8.2%. CONCLUSION: In forensic traumatology, penetrating abdominal injuries commonly lead to life-threatening conditions and loss of organ function, which represent the most severe category in trauma severity assessment. Penetrating abdominal injuries most often result from violent incidents, as observed in our study and in the literature.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Forensic Medicine , Wounds, Penetrating , Humans , Abdominal Injuries/epidemiology , Female , Male , Adult , Wounds, Penetrating/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Turkey/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adrenal gland injury (AGI) associated with trauma is an uncommon and often overlooked condition. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of AGI in individuals with severe trauma injuries and investigate the outcomes of patients with AGI. METHODS: All patients admitted to a tertiary trauma referral center under the trauma protocol who had a computed tomography (CT) scan between January 2012 and January 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who were dead on arrival and patients with incomplete data were excluded. They were classified into two main groups, adult and pediatric, and further subcategorized by the presence or absence of radiologically evident AGI. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, injury severity scores (ISS), presence of concurrent abdominal injury, and 30-day mortality rates were compared. A separate analysis was performed for factors affecting mortality rates. RESULTS: A total of 1,253 patients were included: 950 adults and 303 pediatric patients. In the adult group, AGI was detected in 45 (4.7%) patients and was more commonly associated with the following mechanisms of injury: motor vehicle accidents (26.7% vs. 14.3%) and pedestrian accidents (37.8% vs. 15.5%). Injury to the right side was more common (55.6%). Patients with AGI had higher rates of concurrent liver (17.8% vs. 3.9%), spleen (11.1% vs. 3.6%), and kidney injuries (15.6% vs. 1.3%). In the pediatric population, AGI was detected in 30 patients (14.8%), a significantly higher rate compared to the adult group. Similar to the adult group, AGI was more commonly associated with concurrent abdominal injuries and had a right-sided dominance (60%), but the rate of concurrent abdominal injuries was higher in the pediatric group (80% vs. 46%). The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in both adult and pediatric AGI groups compared to patients without AGI (adult: 15.6% vs. 2.9%, pediatric: 10% vs. 1.8%). In patients with AGI, major head and neck injuries and chest injuries were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Adrenal gland injuries due to trauma are not uncommon. They are usually associated with blunt trauma and other concurrent abdominal organ injuries. The major contributors to mortality in patients with AGI were major head and neck injuries and chest injuries.
Subject(s)
Adrenal Glands , Injury Severity Score , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Male , Female , Adrenal Glands/injuries , Adrenal Glands/diagnostic imaging , Adrenal Glands/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Child , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Abdominal Injuries/mortality , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Abdominal Injuries/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Young Adult , Aged , Turkey/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Isolated pancreatic injury after blunt abdominal trauma is rare but unreliably excludable based on clinical symptoms. A CT-abdomen is the golden standard in diagnosing. Undiagnosed pancreatic injury can result in severe complications as abscesses and fistulas. CASE DESCRIPTION: A sixteen-year old patient was brought to the Emergency Department (ED) with epigastric pain, two days after a low-energy scooter accident. No (abdominal) alarming symptoms were objectified during direct assessment by the general practitioner. However, a complete pancreatic transection was diagnosed after assessment at the ED, eventually resulting in a distal pancreatectomy with postoperative associated complications. CONCLUSION: In all traumas, the mechanism of injury should be judged critically for the possibility of abdominal injury (as pancreatic damage) and thus the need for imaging. An initially harmless clinical condition can mask extensive injury. This case illustrates the importance of thoughtful expectant policies with return instructions or demarcated follow-up when no CT-scan is performed.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Pancreas , Pancreatectomy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Humans , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Pancreas/injuries , Male , Adolescent , Accidents, Traffic , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
Importance: The spleen is often removed in laparotomy after traumatic abdominal injury, with little effort made to preserve the spleen. Objective: To explore the association of surgical management (splenic repair vs splenectomy) with outcomes in patients with traumatic splenic injuries undergoing laparotomy and to determine whether splenic repair is associated with lower mortality compared with splenectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a trauma registry-based cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from January 2013 to December 2019. Participants included adult patients with severe splenic injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] grades 3-5) undergoing laparotomy after traumatic injury within 6 hours of admission. Data analysis was performed from April to August 2023. Exposures: Splenic repair vs splenectomy in patients with severe traumatic splenic injury. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were compared using different statistical approaches, including 1:1 exact matching with consecutive conditional logistic regression analysis as the primary analysis and multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and inverse-probability weighting as sensitivity analyses. Results: A total of 11â¯247 patients (median [IQR] age, 35 [24-52] years; 8179 men [72.7%]) with a severe traumatic splenic injury undergoing laparotomy were identified. Of these, 10â¯820 patients (96.2%) underwent splenectomy, and 427 (3.8%) underwent splenic repair. Among patients who underwent an initial splenic salvage procedure, 23 (5.3%) required a splenectomy during the subsequent hospital stay; 400 patients with splenic preservation were matched with 400 patients who underwent splenectomy (matched for age, sex, hypotension, trauma mechanism, AIS spleen grade, and AIS groups [0-2, 3, and 4-5] for head, face, neck, thorax, spine, and lower and upper extremity). Mortality was significantly lower in the splenic repair group vs the splenectomy group (26 patients [6.5%] vs 51 patients [12.8%]). The association of splenic repair with lower mortality was subsequently verified by conditional regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9; P = .03). Multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, and inverse-probability weighting confirmed this association. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study, splenic repair was independently associated with lower mortality compared with splenectomy during laparotomy after traumatic splenic injury. These findings suggest that efforts to preserve the spleen might be indicated in selected cases of severe splenic injuries.
Subject(s)
Spleen , Splenectomy , Humans , Splenectomy/methods , Splenectomy/statistics & numerical data , Splenectomy/mortality , Male , Female , Adult , Spleen/injuries , Spleen/surgery , Middle Aged , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Propensity Score , Laparotomy/methods , Laparotomy/statistics & numerical data , Injury Severity Score , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The growing geriatric population has specific medical characteristics that should be taken into account especially in trauma setting. There is little evidence on management of abdominal trauma in the elderly and this article compares the management and outcomes of younger and older patients in order to highlight fields of improvement. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective database analysis from two European university hospitals selecting patients admitted for abdominal injury and extracted the following data: epidemiological data, mechanisms of the trauma, vital signs, blood tests, injuries, applied treatments, trauma scores and outcomes. We compared to different age group (16-64 and 65+ years old) using uni- and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: 1181 patients were included for statistical analysis. The main mechanisms of injury in both group were traffic accidents and in the elderly group, falls were more frequent. Both had similar Abbreviated Injury Score except for the thoracic injuries, which was higher in the elderly group. We reported a death rate of 13% in the elderly group and 7% in the younger group. However, multivariable analysis did not report age as an independent predictor of mortality. The management including surgery, blood transfusion and need for intensive care were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Although elderly patients suffering abdominal trauma have an almost two fold higher mortality, their management is quite similar leading to an important point of improvement in regards to triage and lower threshold for more aggressive management and surveillance. Age itself does not seem to be a reliable predictor of mortality. Introducing a frailty score when taking care of elderly trauma patients could improve the outcomes.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Databases, Factual , Humans , Aged , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Abdominal Injuries/epidemiology , Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Abdominal Injuries/mortality , Adult , Age Factors , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to use natural language processing to predict the presence of intra-abdominal injury using unstructured data from electronic medical records. METHODS: This was a random-sample retrospective observational cohort study leveraging unstructured data from injured patients taken to one of 9 acute care hospitals in an integrated health system between 2015 and 2021. Patients with International Classification of Diseases External Cause of Morbidity codes were identified. History and physical, consult, progress, and radiology report text from the first 8 hours of care were abstracted. Annotator dyads independently annotated encounters' text files to establish ground truth regarding whether intra-abdominal injury occurred. Features were extracted from text using natural language processing techniques, bag of words, and principal component analysis. We tested logistic regression, random forests, and gradient boosting machine to determine accuracy, recall, and precision of natural language processing to predict intra-abdominal injury. RESULTS: A random sample of 7,000 patient encounters of 177,127 was annotated. Only 2,951 had sufficient information to determine whether an intra-abdominal injury was present. Among those, 84 (2.9%) had an intra-abdominal injury. The concordance between annotators was 0.989. Logistic regression of features identified with bag of words and principal component analysis had the best predictive ability, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.9, recall of 0.73, and precision of 0.17. Text features with greatest importance included "abdomen," "pelvis," "spleen," and "hematoma." CONCLUSION: Natural language processing could be a screening decision support tool, which, if paired with human clinical assessment, can maximize precision of intra-abdominal injury identification.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Electronic Health Records , Natural Language Processing , Humans , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Abdominal Injuries/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
Diagnosis of relevant organ injury after blunt abdominal injury (AI) in multiple-injury/polytraumatised patients is challenging. AI can be distinguished between injuries of parenchymatous organs (POI) of the upper abdomen (liver, spleen) and bowel and mesenteric injuries (BMI). Still, such injuries may be associated with delays in diagnosis and treatment. The present study aimed to verify laboratory parameters, imaging diagnostics, physical examination and related injuries to predict intraabdominal injuries. This retrospective, single-centre study includes data from multiple-injury/polytraumatised patients between 2005 and 2017. Two main groups were defined with relevant abdominal injury (AI+) and without abdominal injury (AI-). The AI+ group was divided into three subgroups: BMI+, BMI+/POI+, and POI+. Groups were compared in a univariate analysis for significant differences. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors for AI+, BMI+ and POI+. 26.3% (271 of 1032) of the included patients had an abdominal injury. Subgroups were composed of 4.7% (49 of 1032) BMI+, 4.7% (48 of 1032) BMI+/POI+ and 16.8% (174 of 1032) POI+. Pathological abdominal signs had a sensitivity of 48.7% and a specificity of 92.4% for AI+. Transaminases were significantly higher in cases of AI+. Pathological computed tomography (CT) (free fluid, parenchymal damage, Bowel Injury Prediction Score (BIPS), CT Grade > 4) was summarised and had a sensitivity of 94.8%, a specificity of 98%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.5% and, negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.2% for AI+. The detected predictors for AI+ were pathological abdominal findings (odds ratio (OR) 3.93), pathological multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) (OR 668.9), alanine (ALAT) ≥ 1.23 µmol/ls (OR 2.35) and associated long bone fractures (OR 3.82). Pathological abdominal signs, pathological MSCT and lactate (LAC) levels ≥ 1.94 mmol/l could be calculated as significant risk factors for BMI+. For POI+ pathological abdominal MSCT, ASAT ≥ 1.73 µmol/ls and concomitant thoracic injuries had significant relevance. The study presents reliable risk factors for abdominal injury and its sub-entities. The predictors can be explained by the anatomy of the trunk and existing studies. Elevated transaminases predicted abdominal injury (AI+) and, specifically, the POI+. The pathological MSCT was the most reliable predictive parameter. However, it was essential to include further relevant parameters.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Multiple Trauma , Humans , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Multiple Trauma/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Adult , Middle Aged , Early Diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Inferior vena cava (IVC) injury is a potentially fatal injury with a high mortality rate of 34-70%. In cases in which the patient's condition is stable, diagnosis by computed tomography (CT) is the criterion standard. Findings on CT include retroperitoneal hematoma around the IVC, extravasation of contrast medium, and abnormal morphology of the IVC. We report a case of an IVC injury that could not be diagnosed by preoperative CT examination and could not be immediately detected during laparotomy. CASE REPORT A 73-year-old woman had stabbed herself in the neck and abdomen at home using a knife. When she arrived at our hospital, we found a stab wound several centimeters long on her abdomen and a cut approximately 15 cm long on her neck. We activated the massive transfusion protocol because she was in a condition of hemorrhagic shock. After blood transfusion and blood pressure stabilization, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a small amount of fluid in the abdominal cavity. An otorhinolaryngologist performed successful drainage and hemostasis, and a laparotomy was performed. Gastric injury and mesentery injury of the transverse colon were identified and repaired with sutures. Subsequent search of the retroperitoneum revealed massive bleeding from an injury to the inferior vena cava (IVC). The IVC was repaired. Postoperative progress was good, and she was discharged from the hospital 65 days after her injuries. CONCLUSIONS We experienced a case of penetrating IVC injury, which is a rare trauma. Occult IVC injury may escape detection by preoperative CT examination or during laparotomy.
Subject(s)
Laparotomy , Missed Diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vena Cava, Inferior , Wounds, Stab , Humans , Female , Aged , Vena Cava, Inferior/injuries , Vena Cava, Inferior/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Stab/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Stab/surgery , Wounds, Stab/complications , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Vascular System Injuries/surgery , Vascular System Injuries/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: High-grade pancreaticoduodenal injuries are highly morbid and may require complex surgical management. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) is sometimes utilized in the management of these injuries, but guidelines on its use are lacking. This paper aims to present our 14-year experience in management of high-grade pancreaticoduodenal injuries at our busy, urban trauma center. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients (ages >15 years) presenting with high-grade (AAST-OIS Grades IV and V) injuries to the pancreas or duodenum at our Southeastern Level 1 trauma center. Inclusion criteria included high-grade injury and requirement of Whipple procedure based on surgeon discretion. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) those who underwent Whipple procedures during the index operation and (2) Whipple candidates. Whipple candidates included patients who received Whipples in a staged fashion or who would have benefited from the procedure but either died or were salvaged to another procedure. Demographics, injury patterns, management, and outcomes were compared. Primary outcome was survival to discharge. RESULTS: Of 66,272 trauma patients in this study period, 666 had pancreatic or duodenal injuries, and 20 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 6 had Whipples on the index procedure and 14 were Whipple candidates (among whom 7 had staged Whipples, 6 died before completing a Whipple, and 1 was salvaged). Median (IQR) age was 28 (22.75-40) years. Patients were 85 % male, 70 % Black. GSWs comprised 95 % of injuries. All patients had at least one concomitant injury, most commonly major vascular injury (75 %), colonic injury (65 %), and hepatic injury (60 %). In-hospital mortality among Whipple patients was 15 %. CONCLUSIONS: Complex pancreaticoduodenal injuries requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy are rare but life-threatening. In such patients, hemorrhage was the leading cause of death in the first 24 h. Approximately half underwent damage control surgery with staged Whipple Procedures. However, pancreaticoduodenectomy at the initial operation is feasible in highly selective patients, depending on the extent of injury, physiologic status, and resuscitation.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Duodenum , Pancreas , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Trauma Centers , Humans , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Male , Duodenum/injuries , Duodenum/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Female , Pancreas/injuries , Pancreas/surgery , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/mortality , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/mortality , Injury Severity Score , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
Trauma is a serious public health problem, and abdominal injuries are among the leading causes of hospitalization after trauma. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the outcome of abdominal trauma and its predictors in patients who underwent laparotomy at Asella Referral and Teaching Hospital (ARTH), South Central Ethiopia. We conducted a retrospective institutional based cross-sectional study of patients who underwent laparotomy for abdominal trauma at ARTH from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2020. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine associations between independent factors and mortality due to abdominal trauma, and a P value of <0.05 indicated statistical significance. Out of 139 patients, 110 (79.1%) were males and 88 (63.3%) aged <30 years old, with a mean age of 29 ± 15.73 years. The most common mechanism of injury was penetrating trauma, which accounted for 94 (67.6%) patients. The mortality rate was 21 (15.1%). Factors such as blunt mechanism of injury (95% CI: AOR: 3.36, 1.24-9.09), SBP < 90 mmHg at presentation (95% CI: AOR = 9.37, 3.28-26.80), time >6 hours from trauma to admission (95% CI: AOR: 5.44, 1.78-16.63), unstable intraoperative patient condition (95% CI: AOR = 8.82, 3.05-25.52), and patients who need blood transfusion (95% CI: AOR: 6.63, 1.92-22.91) were significantly associated with mortality. The mortality rate of abdominal trauma patients who underwent laparotomy was high. Therefore, healthcare providers should provide priority for traumatic patients as prolonged waiting time to get healthcare results in poor outcomes for the patients.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Hospitals, Teaching , Laparotomy , Humans , Male , Female , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/mortality , Abdominal Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Penetrating/surgery , Wounds, Penetrating/mortality , Wounds, Penetrating/epidemiology , Referral and ConsultationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Abdominal trauma in children is a significant health concern that often leads to severe complications and even death. Children experience trauma more frequently than adults, with approximately one in four pediatric patients suffering from serious abdominal injuries. Falls are the leading cause of such trauma among children, which is intriguing considering that most hospital admissions for pediatric abdominal injuries result from blunt force impacts. METHOD: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of medical records was conducted to examine all patients under the age of 16 who underwent exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2023. The clinical data were gathered using a data extraction sheet from each patient's medical charts. Information on socio-demographic characteristics, injury mechanisms, clinical conditions at the initial presentation, intraoperative findings and complications, and patient outcomes were collected. RESULTS: The study involved a total of 90 patients, consisting of 72 males (80%) and 18 females (20%). The average age of the patients was 10, with a standard deviation of 4.7, ranging from 2 to 16 years. Half of the patients were below the age of 10, accounting for 46 individuals (51%). The causes of the injuries varied among patients below and above the age of 10. However, overall, bullet injuries were the most common cause, accounting for 28 cases (31%), followed by falls in 21 cases (23.3%), horse or donkey kicks in 10 cases (11.1%), stab injuries in 10 cases (11.1%), horn injuries in 7 cases (7.8%), and road traffic accidents in 6 cases (6.7%). Physical assault, blasts, and other types of injuries, such as hen bites and metal rod injuries, were observed in 8 cases (8.9%) of the patients. Fall accidents, horse or donkey kicks, and horn injuries were particularly more common among children below the age of 10, while bullet injuries and stab injuries were most common among those above the age of 10. CONCLUSION: Following abdominal trauma in children, a range of complications may arise, including immediate issues such as infections and hemorrhaging, as well as long-term consequences like impaired organ functionality and psychological distress. In our region, young children are particularly vulnerable to accidents involving falls, kicks from horses or donkeys, and injuries caused by horns. Therefore, it is crucial to educate parents about these hazards. Additionally, providing appropriate guidance on firearm safety is essential for individuals who possess such weapons.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Abdominal Injuries/etiology , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
SUMMARY: We present a previously healthy 13-year-old male, who sustained a handlebar injury after falling from his bicycle. The computerised tomography (CT) scan indicated a probable pancreatic neoplasm associated with a retroperitoneal haematoma which was, following resection, confirmed histologically to be a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas. These are rare tumours of the pancreas, especially in young males. The rarity of this neoplasm and the mechanism that led to its presentation make this an interesting and unique case.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Humans , Male , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Adolescent , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/surgery , Bicycling/injuriesABSTRACT
Introduction Computed Tomography (CT) to rule out pulmonary embolus (PE) is often ordered during post-trauma laparotomy clinical decompensation (CD) involving fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, and/or leukocytosis. We hypothesize this diagnostic modality is low-yield in the postoperative period when surgery-related sequelae are more probable. Methods This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent trauma laparotomy and had subsequent CT for CD from March 19, 2019 to June 30, 2022. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression were performed. The primary outcome was saddle and lobar PE incidence. Results 1032 adult patients underwent trauma laparotomy with 434 undergoing CT for CD: 137 CT abdomen and pelvis only, 30 CTPE, 265 both. The majority (80.2 %) was male, age 33[interquartile range (IQR) 24-45], suffered penetrating mechanism (57 %), and had ISS 23[IQR16-30]. Injuries at laparotomy included 47 % solid organ, 62 % GI tract, 7 % biliary, 11 % vascular, and 42 % other. 176 (41 %) required damage control laparotomy. Median time to CT post-laparotomy was 174 h [111-235] with saddle and lobar PE in 3 (1 %), peripheral PE 18 (5 %), and abdominal abscess, leak, fluid, or pseudoaneurysm in 222 (51 %). Clinical management was altered (40 %) by antibiotics, therapeutic anticoagulation, drainage, aspiration, filter, thrombectomy, or surgical operation. Patients for whom CT findings changed management were more likely to have had GI tract surgery (69% vs 57 %, p = 0.021), higher white blood cell (WBC) (16.4 [13.1-20.5] vs 15.1 [9.9-19.5], p = 0.002), more hours between CT and laparotomy (184 [141-245] vs 162 [89-230], p = 0.002), and lower mortality (2% vs 8 %, p = 0.008). In-hospital mortality was 5 %; none were PE-related. Predictors of clinical intervention required based on CT imaging were GI tract injury (AOR: 1.65, p = 0.0182), and elevated WBC (AOR: 1.038, p = 0.010 Conclusion Saddle and lobar PE incidence post-trauma laparotomy is low. SIRS-type symptoms prompting postoperative CT commonly have no procedural or antibiotic requirement. Postoperative decompensation is more likely related post-operative complications, and less likely a PE.
Subject(s)
Laparotomy , Pulmonary Embolism , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Male , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Incidence , Tachycardia/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obesity may serve as a protective factor in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) patients due to a "cushion effect". In this study, we aim to use computed tomography (CT) scans to measure abdominal adiposity and its correlation with injury severity in BAT patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of male BAT patients who had undergone CT scans. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were manually measured and height-normalized for analysis at lumbar levels L2 and L3. Statistical methods were used to compare differences in adiposity between patients with and without severe abdominal injuries. For controls, we also compared adipose tissue in patients with and without severe trauma to the chest, where less fat typically accumulates. RESULTS: We included 361 male participants and conducted a comparative analysis of their demographic and injury characteristics. Patients without severe abdominal injuries had significantly higher SAT and VAT indices at both L2 and L3 (p < 0.05). However, these measures showed no significant differences between patients with and without severe chest trauma. Solid organ injuries, particularly liver injuries, were associated with decreased SAT and VAT. CONCLUSION: Increase abdominal adiposity was linked to lower abdominal injury severity and solid organ injuries, particularly liver injuries. In addition to conventional BMI for evaluating obesity, either subcutaneous or visceral adipose tissue over lumbar levels L2 and L3 can be used to assess the "cushion effect."
Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Humans , Male , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Obesity , Body Mass Index , Intra-Abdominal Fat/diagnostic imaging , Adiposity/physiology , Injury Severity ScoreABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) is well accepted in appropriate patients. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) in higher-grade injuries likely plays an important role in increasing the success of NOM. We previously implemented a protocol requiring referral of all BSI grades III-V undergoing NOM for SAE. It is unknown the risk of complications as well as longitudinal outcomes. We aimed to examine the splenic salvage rate and safety profile of the protocol. We hypothesized the splenic salvage rate would be high and complications would be low. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at our Level 1 trauma center over a 9-year period. Injury characteristics and outcomes in patients sustaining BSI grades III-V were collected. Outcomes were compared for NOM on protocol (SAE) and off protocol (no angiography or angiography but no embolization). Complications for angiographies were examined. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and February 2019, 570 patients had grade III-V BSI. NOM was attempted in 359 (63 %) with overall salvage rate of 91 % (328). Of these, 305 were on protocol while 54 were off protocol (41 no angiography and 13 angiography but no SAE). During the study period, for every grade of injury a pattern was seen of a higher salvage rate in the on-protocol group when compared to the off-protocol group (Grade III, 97 %(181/187) vs. 89 %(32/36), Grade IV, 91 %(98/108) vs. 69 %(9/13) and Grade V, 80 %(8/10 vs. 0 %(0/5). The overall salvage rate was 94 %(287) on protocol vs. 76 %(41) off protocol (p < 0.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Complications occurred in only 8 of the 318 who underwent angiography (2 %). These included 5 access complications and 3 abscesses. CONCLUSION: The use of a protocol requiring routine splenic artery embolization for all high-grade spleen injuries slated for non-operative management is safe with a very low complication rate. NOM with splenic angioembolization failure rate is improved as compared to non-SAE patients' at all higher grades of injury. Thus, SAE for all hemodynamically stable patients of all high-grade types should be considered as a primary form of therapy for such injuries.