Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 341
Filter
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(Supplement_1): S22-S30, 2024 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147384

ABSTRACT

The procedure with the highest rate of opioid prescription in plastic surgery is abdominoplasty. Additionally, plastic surgery patients are at a particularly elevated risk of becoming opioid-dependent. The main objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and create an algorithm for a multimodal pain regimen specific to patients undergoing abdominoplasty. A systematic search of the research literature was performed to summarize the prevailing understanding of multimodal pain control in the management of abdominoplasty. The initial search yielded 448 articles. Sixty-eight manuscripts were identified for full-text review. The effectiveness of current strategies was evaluated by way of pain scores, opioid usage, and length of stay, as well as other measures of physical function such as time to early mobilization. In 32 studies involving 2451 patients, the efficacy of different pain regimens during abdominoplasty was evaluated. Among nontraditional, opioid-sparing analgesia, efficacy of treatment interventions for improved pain and decreased opioid usage was found inall studies. Among local infusion studies, efficacy of treatment interventions for improved pain and decreased opioid usage was found in 78% of studies. Last, among regional block studies, efficacy of treatment interventions for improved pain was found in 87%, with 73% efficacy for decreased opioid usage. Multimodal pain regimens in abdominoplasty have the potential to play an important role in opioid-sparing practices in medicine by incorporating nonopioid pain adjuvants such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and transversus abdominis plane blocks in the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative periods.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Algorithms , Analgesics, Opioid , Pain Management , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain Management/methods , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome , Nerve Block/methods , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Opioid-Related Disorders/etiology
2.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 144(7)2024 Jun 04.
Article in English, Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832610

ABSTRACT

Background: While most cases of venous thromboembolism follow a benign course, occasionally the condition may manifest a complex clinical presentation and need a comprehensive diagnostic workup to identify the underlying cause and provide the patient with appropriate treatment. Case presentation: A woman in her late thirties presented to the emergency department with a five-day history of dyspnoea. She had recently undergone liposuction surgery after pregnancy. Upon admission, initial investigations revealed a pulmonary embolism with right heart strain, and she was treated with anticoagulants. The following day, she complained of acute-onset right flank pain without fever or other accompanying symptoms. A CT scan of the abdomen confirmed a right-side renal infarction. Further investigations revealed patent foramen ovale between the right and left atria of the heart, believed to be the source of a right-to-left shunt of arterial emboli. Although the patient had not suffered a clinical stroke, it was decided to close this defect using percutaneous technique. Interpretation: Patent foramen ovale is a common condition in adults, but in most cases it remains asymptomatic. However, patients with patent foramen ovale have an elevated risk of arterial emboli affecting multiple organs. The diagnosis depends on thorough assessment to prevent potentially fatal outcomes.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Dyspnea , Foramen Ovale, Patent , Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , Female , Adult , Foramen Ovale, Patent/complications , Foramen Ovale, Patent/surgery , Foramen Ovale, Patent/diagnostic imaging , Dyspnea/etiology , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Infarction/etiology , Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Infarction/diagnosis , Infarction/surgery , Postoperative Complications
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 94: 198-209, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810360

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection has been described as a cause of systemic hypercoagulability and a risk factor for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Whereas some multispecialty studies have proposed a link between COVID-19 and postoperative thrombosis, other single-specialty studies have found no such association. We utilized a large national database to determine whether prior COVID-19 infection was associated with the incidence of VTE following common plastic surgery operations. METHODS: The Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases were used to identify female patients who underwent index abdominal panniculectomy, breast reduction, autologous breast reconstruction, or implant-based breast reconstruction procedures between 2020 and 2021. International Classification of Disease, tenth edition (ICD-10) codes were used to identify patients diagnosed with COVID-19 preoperatively and those who experienced a VTE in the 90 days postoperatively. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine any independent association between COVID-19 and postoperative VTE. RESULTS: Twenty-four thousand two hundred and twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at time of surgery was 44 years. Six percent carried a preoperative COVID-19 diagnosis, and postoperative VTE occurred in 1.3%. In a propensity-score-matched analysis of 2754 patients, COVID-19 did not significantly correlate with incidence of postoperative VTE (P = 0.463). Compared with a matched prepandemic cohort (14,151 patients), the incidence of VTE did not increase following any of the four studied procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: This analysis of a national insurance claims database provides evidence against a link between resolved COVID-19 infection and VTE within 90 days of four common plastic surgery operations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mammaplasty , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Postoperative Complications , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adult , Middle Aged , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Incidence , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Databases, Factual
4.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(15): 2872-2878, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750226

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Complications after abdominoplasty remain an unsolved issue in body contouring surgery. The antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained increasing recognition as a valuable pharmacologic agent within plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of intravenously administered TXA on complications and patient safety after abdominoplasty. METHODS: Within this retrospective single-center study, patients who underwent abdominoplasty and received intravenous TXA were selected and compared to randomly selected patients who underwent abdominoplasty without administration of TXA. The patient population was divided into two study groups (TXA vs no TXA). Demographic and surgical data as well as complications were evaluated and compared. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven female and 3 male patients with a median age of 38 years and a mean BMI of 25.6 ± 3.3 kg/m2 were included in the study. Except smoking history, demographic data showed no statistically significant differences between both groups. The most common complication was seroma formation (n = 16; 23.9%), and its occurrence was statistically significantly lower in the TXA group (p = 0.023). Furthermore, postoperative seroma aspiration was performed in statistically significant lower numbers in the TXA group (p < 0.05). No thromboembolic events or seizures were observed. DISCUSSION: The outcomes of this study showed that the intravenous administration of TXA leads to a significant reduction of seroma formation and postoperative seroma aspiration after abdominoplasty. Simultaneously, no adverse thromboembolic events were detected. Hence we would recommend administration of TXA in body contouring surgery to decrease the incidence of seroma formation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Antifibrinolytic Agents , Body Contouring , Postoperative Complications , Tranexamic Acid , Humans , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Tranexamic Acid/administration & dosage , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/methods , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Male , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Body Contouring/methods , Body Contouring/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Risk Assessment , Seroma/prevention & control , Seroma/etiology , Seroma/epidemiology
5.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(15): 2851-2860, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649525

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Combined ventral hernia repair and abdominoplasty treat risk factors such as high body mass index and weak abdominal musculature, providing excellent intraoperative exposure and improved patient outcomes. Unfortunately, a combination of traditional procedures is unfeasible as the umbilical blood supply would be compromised, leading to increased umbilical necrosis risk. This narrative review aimed to identify new techniques and solidify evidence in preserving umbilical blood supply and associated level of evidence. METHODS: Two authors conducted a thorough literature search on PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from January 1901 to July 2023, adhering to the methodologies of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Studies were reviewed for their surgical technique and quality of evidence. The primary outcomes of interest consisted of umbilical complications of this combined procedure. RESULTS: Six techniques were identified that included laparoscopic, pre-rectus, unilateral, distal bilateral, proximal bilateral, and inferior midline approaches. All techniques demonstrated as viable options in preserving umbilical blood supply as reported complications were few, minor, and compounded by risk factors. However, all included techniques were limited to low-to-moderate-quality evidence. CONCLUSION: Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, all techniques remain viable options for combined ventral hernia repair and abdominoplasty. Large-scale high-quality RCTs are required to compare the effectiveness of various approaches with additional outcomes of hernia recurrence rates, intraoperative time, and patient- and surgeon-reported satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Hernia, Ventral , Herniorrhaphy , Umbilicus , Humans , Abdominoplasty/methods , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Umbilicus/surgery , Umbilicus/blood supply , Female
6.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(9): NP654-NP660, 2024 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669208

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty procedures continue to evolve because combining techniques such as suction-assisted lipectomy or direct subscarpal lipectomy have proven to be powerful adjuncts to achieve optimal aesthetic results. However, concern has been expressed about combining techniques simultaneously given the potential to damage the vascularity of the abdominoplasty flap. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of simultaneous direct subscarpal lipectomy combined with liposuction in abdominoplasty patients. METHODS: A 4-year retrospective review of consecutive abdominoplasties (n = 200) performed by a single surgeon was conducted. Liposuction of the abdominal flap and flanks was performed in all patients. After raising the abdominoplasty flap, undermining was performed to just beyond the xyphoid, the lower rib margins superiorly, and the anterior axillary line laterally. Fat deep to Scarpa's fascia was then removed by direct tangential excision in all zones of the abdominal flap. RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 42.19 years and BMI of 28.10 kg/m2; the mean follow-up time was 7 months. Seroma occurred in 13 patients (6.5%), superficial wound dehiscence treated with local wound care in 16 patients (8%), hypertrophic scarring in 16 patients (8%), partial umbilical necrosis in 1 patient (0.5%), and partial umbilical epidermolysis in 6 patients (3%). No patients experienced major or minor full-thickness tissue loss. No patients needed reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous direct excision of subscarpal fat with liposuction of the abdomen and flanks does not appear to subject any zone of the abdominoplasty flap to increased risks of vascular compromise. No flap necroses were observed. The technique described is safe and may provide superior abdominoplasty results.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Lipectomy , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/methods , Middle Aged , Lipectomy/methods , Lipectomy/adverse effects , Male , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Young Adult , Surgical Flaps/adverse effects , Surgical Flaps/transplantation , Aged , Esthetics , Follow-Up Studies
7.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(13): 2465-2474, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548959

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Strategies minimizing surgical bleeding, including the antifibrinolytic agent tranexamic acid, play a crucial role in clinical practice to optimize overall surgical outcomes. Despite its proven efficacy in various clinical fields, there is a limited understanding regarding the use of tranexamic acid in plastic and aesthetic procedures. This study is the first investigating the effects of systemically administered tranexamic acid on postoperative blood loss and bleeding complications in fleur-de-lis abdominoplasties and apronectomies. METHODS: Patients who received 1 g tranexamic acid (n = 44) during fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty or apronectomy were retrospectively compared with those who did not (n = 44). In this context, the outcome parameters 24-h and total drain fluid production, drain time, hospital stay, absolute and relative drop in hemoglobin and hematocrit level as well as bleeding complications such as blood transfusion, hematoma puncture and evacuation were evaluated. RESULTS: Tranexamic acid significantly decreased both drainage volume in 24 h (40.5%, p = 0.0046) and total drain fluid production (42.5%, p = 0.0017). Moreover, a shorter drainage time (19.4%, p = 0.0028) and hospital stay (21.4%, p = 0.0009) were observed. The administration of tranexamic acid was also associated with a reduced postoperative decline in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels. Notably, no bleeding complications were observed in patients who received tranexamic acid, while 6 events occurred in patients without (p = 0.0262). CONCLUSION: Systemic administration of tranexamic acid effectively reduced postoperative blood loss and bleeding complications in fleur-de-lis abdominoplasties and apronectomies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Antifibrinolytic Agents , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Tranexamic Acid , Humans , Tranexamic Acid/administration & dosage , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/methods , Female , Retrospective Studies , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Middle Aged , Male , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Cohort Studies , Risk Assessment , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control
8.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(4): 101331, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447678

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abdominoplasty surgery is a common body contouring surgery to remove excess fat and skin and restore weakened or separated abdominal muscles caused by aging, pregnancy, or weight fluctuations. There is limited literature regarding patient and pregnancy outcomes after abdominoplasty. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether there was a correlation between adverse pregnancy outcomes and history of abdominoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Our study used a large federated deidentified national health research network with data sourced from 68 healthcare organizations within the United States (TriNetX; data accessed on August 19, 2022). All patients with a record of pregnancy were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, codes and were grouped into those with a history of abdominoplasty and those without. This study evaluated the perinatal outcomes of fetal growth restriction, abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, gestational diabetes mellitus, macrosomia, stillbirth, abnormal placentation, and wound disruption or infection occurring during a patient's pregnancy after abdominoplasty. Propensity matching was performed to account for potential confounders. An alpha level of <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 44,737 patients meeting our criteria, 304 had a history of abdominoplasty, whereas 44,433 did not (control). Our study found that patients with a history of abdominoplasty had significantly higher gravidity, were largely located in the Southern and Midwest region, and had higher counts of vaginal deliveries and cesarean deliveries than the control cohort (Table 1). After propensity score matching, our study found a lower risk of preeclampsia and preterm premature rupture of membranes in patients with abdominoplasty (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.67; P<.0001) (Table 2). Furthermore, abdominoplasty was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-3.13; P=.0002) (Table 2). Lastly, this study did not find significant differences in the other perinatal outcomes (Table 2). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that abdominoplasty may be associated with a relative increase in the rates of preterm delivery and cesarean delivery and that other perinatal outcomes are not increased. This provides evidence that future desire for pregnancy need not be a relative contraindication to abdominoplasty.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Abdominoplasty/methods , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/etiology , Infant, Newborn
9.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(9): 965-975, 2024 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38494872

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Different types of abdominoplasties have been developed to address individual patient characteristics. However, an analysis of complication rates and risk factors for different types of abdominoplasties has yet to be reported. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the complication rates and risks associated with each type of abdominoplasty. METHODS: Utilizing the CosmetAssure database, patients undergoing an abdominoplasty from 2015 to 2022 were identified. Demographic factors and major complications were recorded and analyzed with a chi-square test or analysis of variance. A logistic regression was performed to identify the risk for developing complications associated with each type of abdominoplasty. RESULTS: A total of 55,596 patients underwent an abdominoplasty procedure by any method. The overall complication rate was 2.1%. There was a significant difference in the overall complication rates of all 7 types of abdominoplasties (P < .05), with fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty having the highest complication rate. The year of surgery, being underweight or morbidly obese, having diabetes, and being male placed patients at a significantly higher risk for developing a postoperative complication. Over 15,000 patients (27.2%) had concurrent procedures related to breast surgery, other body contouring, liposuction, or facial surgery. When accounting for various risk factors in a regression model, there was no significant added risk for major complications after a combination procedure with an abdominoplasty compared to abdominoplasty alone. CONCLUSIONS: Among the different types of abdominoplasties, a fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty has the highest complication rate. Concurrent cosmetic procedures with an abdominoplasty showed no added risk for major complications when compared to abdominoplasty alone.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Female , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors , Middle Aged , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/methods , Adult , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Risk Assessment
10.
Clin Transplant ; 38(1): e15226, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38289878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the obesity crisis in the United States continues, some renal transplantation centers have liberalized their BMI criteria necessary for transplant eligibility. More individuals with larger body-habitus related comorbidities with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) now qualify for renal transplantation (RT). Surgical modalities from other fields also interact with this patient population. METHODS: In order to assess surgical outcomes of panniculectomy in the context of renal transplantation and ESRD, the authors performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Due to a paucity of existing primary studies, we retrospectively collected data on patients with ESRD undergoing panniculectomy from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to evaluate outcomes of body contouring in this patient population. RESULTS: From the systematic review, a total of 783 ESRD patients underwent panniculectomy among the studies identified. Of these, 91 patients underwent panniculectomy simultaneously to RT while 692 had their pannus resected prior to kidney transplant. The most common complication was hematoma followed by wound dehiscence. From the NSQIP database, 24 868 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis. In the setting of renal transplant status, patients with diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, and requiring dialysis were more likely to suffer postoperative complications (OR 1.31, 1.15, and 2.2, respectively). However, upon sub-analysis of specific types of complications, the only retained association was between diabetes and wound complication. CONCLUSION: Preliminary data show that panniculectomy in ESRD patients appears to be safe, though with a nominal increased risk for complications. Pannus resection does not appear to impact post-transplantation outcomes, including long-term allograft survival. Larger, higher powered, randomized studies are needed to confirm the safety, utility, and medical benefit of panniculectomy in the context of renal transplantation.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Diabetes Mellitus , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies
11.
Hernia ; 28(1): 97-107, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648895

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Literature on one- versus two-staged abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with complex gastrointestinal reconstruction (GIR) is limited to single-arm case series with a focus on patients who complete all planned stages. Herein, we describe our experience with both one- and two-staged approaches to AWR/GIR, with attention to those who did not complete both intended stages. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted to identify patients who underwent a one- or two-stage approach to GIR/AWR from 2013 to 2020. The one-stage approach included GIR and definitive sublay mesh herniorrhaphy. The two-stage approach included Stage 1 (S1)-GIR and non-definitive herniorrhaphy and Stage 2 (S2)-definitive sublay mesh herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients underwent GIR/AWR: 20 (37.0%) underwent a planned 1-stage operation while 34 (63.0%) underwent S1 of a planned 2-stage approach. Patients assigned to the 2-stage approach were more likely to be smokers, have a history of mesh infection, have an enterocutaneous fistula, and a contaminated wound class (p<0.05). Of the 34 patients who underwent S1, 12 (35.3%) completed S2 during the mean follow-up period of 44 months while 22 (64.7%) did not complete S2. Of these, 10 (45.5%) developed hernia recurrence but did not undergo S2 secondary to elective nonoperative management (40%), pending preoperative optimization (30%), additional complex GIR (10%), hernia-related incarceration requiring emergent surgery (10%), or unrelated death (10%). No differences in outcome including SSI, SSO, readmission, and recurrence were noted between the 12 patients who completed the two-stage approach and the 20 patients who completed a one-stage approach, despite increased risk factors for complications in the 2-stage group (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Planned two-stage operations for GIR/AWR may distribute operative complexity and post-operative morbidity into separate surgical interventions. However, many patients may never undergo the intended definitive S2 herniorrhaphy. Future evaluation of 1- versus 2-stage GIR/AWR is needed to clarify indications for each approach. This work must also consider the frequent deviations from intended clinical course demonstrated in this study.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Abdominoplasty , Hernia, Ventral , Humans , Abdominal Wall/surgery , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Hernia, Ventral/etiology , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects
12.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(2): 174-182, 2024 Jan 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37477908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of compression garments in the postoperative period of abdominoplasty seems to be a consensus, but the incidents of complications arising from this have been described, related to an increase in intraabdominal pressure and reduction of the femoral vein blood flow that may facilitate thromboembolic events. There are no studies that have evaluated the isolated effect of postoperative compression garments on respiratory function. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of compression garments on respiratory function after abdominoplasty. METHODS: Thirty-four female patients who underwent standard abdominoplasty were divided into 2 groups, the garment group (n = 18) and the no garment group (n = 16). Respiratory function assessment (with spirometry and manovacuometry) was performed in the preoperative and postoperative periods. RESULTS: Forced vital capacity assessment revealed a greater ventilatory restriction in the garment group. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) showed differences between the evaluation time points in the garment group; the intergroup comparisons showed that the no garment group had a lower FEV1. Slow vital capacity was evaluated with no significant differences found on both intergroup comparisons. The inspiratory capacity was reduced in the garment group, representing ventilatory restriction. Measurements of the maximum inspiratory pressure showed no significant differences between the groups. The maximum expiratory pressure showed significantly lower values on postoperative day 7 in the garment group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of compression garments after abdominoplasty impairs ventilatory function. Not wearing this type of garment can improve ventilation, decreasing the risk of pulmonary complications.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Humans , Female , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Stockings, Compression , Respiration , Lung , Clothing
13.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(3): 369-375, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37962624

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study intends to assess the complications and outcomes related to the use of UAL (LIPO SAVER, LHbiomed Co, Gangnam-gu, Korea) versus a combination of UAL and PAL (Microaire, Charlottesville, VA, USA) within the abdominoplasty procedure. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective study used patient data and chart reviews in a single surgeon's private cosmetic practice. The study involved patients who underwent the lipoabdominoplasty technique with UAL and a combination of UAL and PAL (UAL/PAL) over 4 years from October 2017 through December 2022. A total of 280 patients (272 female, eight male) who underwent standard (n:258) or fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty (n:22) due to skin excess, musculofascial laxity, and lipodystrophy were included in the study. Patients with illnesses affecting microcirculation, such as diabetes mellitus type I and II, cardiopulmonary diseases, oral contraceptive usage, hereditary bleeding and thrombotic disorders, and those who had undergone revision abdominoplasties were excluded. RESULTS: BMI above 30 kg/m2 was associated with an increased risk of both minor and major complications in the UAL abdominoplasty group (P = 0.005 and 0.001, respectively). On the other hand, BMI over 30 kg/m2 was associated with an increased risk of major complications in the UAL/PAL abdominoplasty group (P = 0.011). BMI over 30 kg/m2 was associated with an overall increased rate of minor and major complications in both the UAL and UAL/PAL groups (P = 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). There was no statistical difference between the UAL and UAL/PAL groups regarding complications, but a slight increase in the overall complication rate was observed in the UAL group (P = 0.061). Additionally, the study unveiled that there was no correlation found between age, gender, duration of surgery, lipoaspirate volumes and combined surgeries with an increased risk of complications between groups. CONCLUSION: BMI over 30 kg/m2 has been shown to have an adverse effect on the profile of complications in both groups, resulting in an increased risk, especially for major and minor complications such as seroma in the UAL group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Lipoabdominoplasty , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Patient Safety , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/methods , Skin , Treatment Outcome
14.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 153(1): 66-74, 2024 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37010463

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated trends in practice patterns for abdominoplasty based on a 16-year review of tracer data collected by the American Board of Plastic Surgery as part of the continuous certification process. METHODS: To facilitate comparison of an equal number of patients over time, tracer data from 2005 to 2021 were split into an early cohort (EC) (from 2005 to 2014) and a recent cohort (RC) (from 2015 to 2021). Fisher exact tests and two-sample t tests were used to compare patient demographics, surgical techniques, and complication rates. RESULTS: Data from 8990 abdominoplasties (EC, n = 4740; RC, n = 4250) were analyzed. RC abdominoplasties report a lower rate of complications (RC, 19%; EC, 22%; P < 0.001) and a lower rate of revision surgery (RC 8%; EC, 10%; P < 0.001). This has occurred despite the increased use of abdominal flap liposuction (RC, 25%; EC, 18%; P < 0.001). There has been a decline in the use of wide undermining (81% versus 75%; P < 0.001), vertical plication of the abdomen (89% versus 86%; P < 0.001), and surgical drains (93% versus 89%; P < 0.001). Abdominoplasty surgery is increasingly performed in an outpatient setting, with increased use of chemoprophylaxis for thrombosis prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of these American Board of Plastic Surgery tracer data highlights important trends in clinical practice over the past 16 years. Abdominoplasty continues to be a safe and effective procedure with similar complication and revision rates over the 16-year period.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Surgery, Plastic , Humans , United States , Surgery, Plastic/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Certification
15.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (9): 95-102, 2023.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37707338

ABSTRACT

The review is devoted to the treatment of ventral hernias in patients with morbid obesity. This issue is important due to significant number of such patients and no unambiguous clinical recommendations. The advantages of simultaneous surgery (with bariatric intervention) are obvious, i.e. lower risk of postoperative hernia incarceration and no need for re-hospitalization with another intervention. High risk of bariatric population makes it necessary to minimize surgery time and surgical trauma. A staged approach with reducing body weight surgically or conservatively before hernia repair is often chosen. Hernia repair should be performed using laparoscopic or robotic techniques with obligatory use of mesh implants. Panniculectomy or abdominoplasty as the main surgery is a valid option. Currently, it is necessary to develop clear criteria for selecting patients with morbid obesity for staged and simultaneous treatment of ventral hernias.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Hernia, Ventral , Incisional Hernia , Obesity, Morbid , Humans , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Obesity, Morbid/diagnosis , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Hernia, Ventral/diagnosis , Hernia, Ventral/etiology , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects
16.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 47(6): 2533-2542, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mommy-makeover is becoming very popular to help them reshaping their own bodies and restoring self-perception, hardly stressed by childbearing-related changes. However, debate exists in the literature concerning safety and aesthetic outcome in patients undergoing combined procedures. The study aims to shed a light on advantages and disadvantages in mommy-makeover technique compared to conventional abdominoplasty with a particular attention to psychological aspects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 37 women were enrolled at Campus Bio-Medico Hospital in Rome between October 2019 and January 2022. All of the patients were eligible for both abdominoplasty only and mommy-makeover. We proposed to the patients both procedures explaining risks and benefits; then, based on the preference of the single patient, we performed either mommy-makeover (Group A) or abdominoplasty alone (Group B). In order to evaluate patients' satisfaction and safety, multiple questionnaires were administered 9-month postoperatively (BUT, POSAS, visual perception, etc.). RESULTS: The sample analyzed was composed of 37 patients (treatment group = 18, control group = 19). In the pre-post comparisons of BUT-A performed, there were statistically significant differences recorded in both groups and for all observed variables. The significance values were all less than 1% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined surgery proved not to be inferior in terms of patient safety. At the same time, the effectiveness in improving diastasis-related symptoms is fully comparable with single surgery. Treatment group showcases a considerable superiority in terms of body-image perception improvement and overall patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Prospective Studies , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Esthetics , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
17.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 47(4): 1472-1479, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37266593

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As advanced maternal age and bariatric procedures have become more common, the number of women seeking pregnancy after having abdominoplasty has increased. This has traditionally been a relative contraindication and counselled against, though there are little data in the literature regarding the potential effects to mother and baby. METHODS: A systematic review of Medline and Embase databases was performed to identify cases of pregnancy occurring after abdominoplasty. Data were extracted and analysed for presentation. RESULTS: 17 studies encompassing 237 patients met inclusion. Mean age was 33.08 years. Mean parity prior to first pregnancy after abdominoplasty 2.13. Previous bariatric surgery was reported in 31.75%. Body contouring procedure was abdominoplasty (94.51%), body lift (3.80%) and other (1.69%). Rectus plication was performed in 89.74%, where reported. Mean time between abdominoplasty and pregnancy was 3.75 years. Method of delivery was Caesarean section in 43.63%, and vaginal delivery in 56.37%. Mean gestational age at delivery was 38.90 weeks. Preterm delivery (<37 weeks) was reported in 9.85%, and low birthweight (<2500 g) was reported in 7.22%. Diagnoses or complications were documented in 14 studies (136 patients). These were grouped as foetal/neonatal (n = 21), maternal (n = 104) or abdominal wall/aesthetic (n = 96); and are detailed within. There were no neonatal or maternal mortalities in any study. A lower-than-expected spinal anaesthetic block was stated in 3 cases. Mean follow-up was 8.5 months. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy should not be contraindicated after abdominoplasty. The data presented allow clinicians to have an evidence-based discussion and provide information for shared decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Abdominoplasty , Bariatric Surgery , Body Contouring , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Infant , Cesarean Section , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/methods , Body Contouring/methods , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Treatment Outcome
18.
Aesthet Surg J ; 43(9): 986-993, 2023 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37265092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients seeking cosmetic abdominoplasty often have umbilical hernias. Optimal management and safety of concomitant umbilical hernia repair with abdominoplasty is not well described. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare complication rates following abdominoplasty with or without umbilical hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective propensity score matched cohort study of patients who underwent an abdominoplasty at Massachusetts General Hospital was performed. Direct umbilical hernia repair was performed by making a fascial slit inferior or superior to the umbilical stalk. The fascial edges were approximated with up to three 0-Ethibond sutures (Ethicon, Raritan, NJ) from the preperitoneal or peritoneal space. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: The authors identified 231 patients with a mean [standard deviation] age of 46.7 [9.7] years and a mean BMI of 25.9 [4.4] kg/m2. Nine (3.9%) had diabetes, 8 (3.5%) were active smokers, and the median number of previous pregnancies was 2. In total, 223 (96%) had a traditional abdominoplasty, whereas 8 (3.5%) underwent a fleur-de-lys approach. Liposuction was performed on 90%, and 45.4% underwent simultaneous breast or body contouring surgery. The overall complication rate was 6.9%. Propensity scores matched 61 pairs in each group (n = 122) with closely aligned covariates. There was no significant difference in total complication rates between abdominoplasty alone vs abdominoplasty with hernia repair. There were no cases of skin necrosis or umbilical necrosis in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Performing umbilical hernia repair with abdominoplasty is safe when utilizing the technique reported in this series.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Hernia, Umbilical , Humans , Child , Hernia, Umbilical/surgery , Propensity Score , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Necrosis/surgery
20.
Aesthet Surg J ; 43(8): 856-868, 2023 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37093978

ABSTRACT

Abdominoplasty is one of the most common procedures performed in plastic surgery. By removing redundant skin and fat tissue, body contouring narrows the waist and achieves a naturally flattened appearance. To achieve this, one technique frequently utilized is plication of the abdominal rectus sheath. Although abdominal wall plication is commonly performed during abdominoplasty, there is a lack of consensus regarding which plication method provides the best outcomes. Each variation addresses some of the common intraoperative and postoperative complications of abdominoplasty. These include extended operating time, rupture of the plication, epigastric bulging, and patient postoperative dissatisfaction. Many plication techniques have been described in the literature, but no single technique has been adopted by plastic surgeons as the gold standard. Here we present a narrative comparison of current published literature reporting novel or modified abdominoplasty plication techniques. This includes diagrams of each procedure, sutures utilized, and key concepts of each plication technique. Discussion regarding how these modifications change operating time, alter epigastric bulging, and improve the ability to narrow the waist is provided. The purpose of this paper is to provide a concise source document for plastic surgeons to reference when choosing a plication method to use during abdominoplasty.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Abdominoplasty , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Surgery, Plastic , Humans , Abdominal Wall/surgery , Abdominal Muscles/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Abdominoplasty/methods , Surgery, Plastic/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL