Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.437
Filter
1.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(6 (Supple-6)): S23-S27, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39018135

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of statin monotherapy and statin-ezetimibe combination therapy on coronary plaque regression in acute coronary syndrome patients. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted from July to September 2022 and comprised search on PubMed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane databases to identify studies from January 2010 to July 2022 assessing the effects of statin-ezetimibe combination therapy versus statin monotherapy on coronary plaque regression in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The outcomes of interest were total atheroma volume, plaque volume, and percent atheroma volume assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Meta-analyses were performed on the studies, and mean differences with 95% confidence interval were estimated using Review Manager v5.4. RESULTS: Of the 730 studies identified, 12(1.64%) were shortlisted, and, of them, 5(41.7%) were analysed in detail. There were a total of 557 patients with a mean follow-up of 9 ± 2.43 months. The difference between baseline and follow-up showed significant lowering in total atheroma volume, plaque volume, and percent atheroma volume (p<0.05) in the patients who were receiving statin-ezetimibe combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ezetimibe to statin medication was found to be significantly more successful in reducing coronary plaque than statin monotherapy.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Drug Therapy, Combination , Ezetimibe , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Anticholesteremic Agents/administration & dosage , Ezetimibe/therapeutic use , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/drug therapy , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging
2.
Circulation ; 150(4): 317-335, 2024 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39038086

ABSTRACT

For almost two decades, 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been the only class I recommendation on DAPT in American and European guidelines, which has resulted in 12-month durations of DAPT therapy being the most frequently implemented in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) across the globe. Twelve-month DAPT was initially grounded in the results of the CURE (Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events) trial, which, by design, studied DAPT versus no DAPT rather than the optimal DAPT duration. The average DAPT duration in this study was 9 months, not 12 months. Subsequent ACS studies, which were not designed to assess DAPT duration, rather its composition (aspirin with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel) were further interpreted as supportive evidence for 12-month DAPT duration. In these studies, the median DAPT duration was 9 or 15 months for ticagrelor and prasugrel, respectively. Several subsequent studies questioned the 12-month regimen and suggested that DAPT duration should either be fewer than 12 months in patients at high bleeding risk or more than 12 months in patients at high ischemic risk who can safely tolerate the treatment. Bleeding, rather than ischemic risk assessment, has emerged as a treatment modifier for maximizing the net clinical benefit of DAPT, due to excessive bleeding and no clear benefit of prolonged treatment regimens in high bleeding risk patients. Multiple DAPT de-escalation treatment strategies, including switching from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel, reducing the dose of prasugrel or ticagrelor, and shortening DAPT duration while maintaining monotherapy with ticagrelor, have been consistently shown to reduce bleeding without increasing fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular or cerebral ischemic risks compared with 12-month DAPT. However, 12-month DAPT remains the only class-I DAPT recommendation for patients with ACS despite the lack of prospectively established evidence, leading to unnecessary and potentially harmful overtreatment in many patients. It is time for clinical practice and guideline recommendations to be updated to reflect the totality of the evidence regarding the optimal DAPT duration in ACS.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule
3.
BMJ Open ; 14(7): e083730, 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009458

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and concomitant multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) are considered patients with extremely high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and current guidelines specify a lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target for this population. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been shown to effectively reduce LDL-C levels on a statin background. Additionally, several studies have confirmed the role of PCSK9 inhibitors in plaque regression and reducing residual cardiovascular risk in patients with ACS. However, those studies included coronary lesions with a degree of stenosis <50%. Whether the application of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with NSTE-ACS with non-culprit artery critical lesions (stenosis degree between 50% and 75%) has a similar effect on plaque regression and improvement of cardiovascular outcomes remains unknown, with a lack of relevant research. This study aims to further investigate the safety and efficacy of evolocumab in patients with NSTE-ACS and concomitant multivessel CAD (non-culprit artery stenosis between 50% and 75%). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single-centre clinical randomised controlled trial, 122 patients with NSTE-ACS and concomitant multivessel CAD (non-culprit artery stenosis between 50% and 75%) will be randomly assigned to either the evolocumab treatment group or the standard treatment group after completing culprit vessel revascularisation. The evolocumab treatment group will receive evolocumab in addition to statin therapy, while the standard treatment group will receive standard statin therapy. At baseline and week 50, patients in the evolocumab treatment group will undergo coronary angiography and OCT imaging to visualise pre-existing non-lesional vessels. The primary end point is the absolute change in average minimum fibrous cap thickness (FCT) from baseline to week 50. Secondary end points include changes in plaque lipid arc, lipid length, macrophage grading, lipid levels and major adverse cardiovascular events during the 1-year follow-up period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics: this study will adhere to the principles outlined in the Helsinki Declaration and other applicable ethical guidelines. This study protocol has received approval from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), with approval number 2022-ky214. DISSEMINATION: we plan to disseminate the findings of this study through various channels. This includes publication in peer-reviewed academic journals, presentation at relevant academic conferences and communication to the public, policymakers and healthcare professionals. We will also share updates on the research progress through social media and other online platforms to facilitate the exchange and application of scientific knowledge. Efforts will be made to ensure widespread dissemination of the research results and to have a positive impact on society. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200066675.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Coronary Artery Disease , PCSK9 Inhibitors , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Anticholesteremic Agents/adverse effects , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/drug therapy , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging , Female , Male , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged , Proprotein Convertase 9
4.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars ; 52(5): 352-356, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982817

ABSTRACT

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a vital part of the pharmacological management in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While early discontinuation of DAPT increases ischemic risk, some patients on DAPT may require urgent surgery, necessitating its interruption. Cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y12 antagonist, provides strong platelet inhibition within minutes and platelet activity normalizes within one hour after the cessation of the drug. Bridging antiplatelet therapy with cangrelor has been increasingly studied as an alternative option to ensure the continuation of platelet inhibition in CAD patients who require discontinuation of DAPT. The present patient, with a recent history of PCI for acute coronary syndrome, experienced a significant esophageal perforation following transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). This severe complication was effectively managed endoscopically, and as part of the recent PCI treatment, prolonged cangrelor infusion was successfully utilized with no thrombotic or bleeding events throughout the management of the complication.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Adenosine Monophosphate , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Esophageal Perforation , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Humans , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use , Adenosine Monophosphate/adverse effects , Adenosine Monophosphate/administration & dosage , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Male , Aged , Middle Aged
5.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 24(1): 395, 2024 Jul 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High-intensity statin therapy is currently recommended initial guideline therapy in ACS treatment. However, only a minority of patients are achieving LDL-C attainment goal at 6 months. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are on recommended guideline therapy post-ACS if LDL-C goal attainment is not achieved after high-intensity statin (4-6 weeks) and after the addition of ezetimibe if guideline goal attainment is not achieved after an additional 4-6 weeks. Thus, it has been recommended that PCSK9 inhibitors be considered earlier post-ACS. However, the efficacy of early PCSK9 inhibitors initiation in ACS patients remains uncertain. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies involving ACS patients who received PCSK9 inhibitors within 48 h of hospitalization were included. Common and random effects models were used to evaluate the pooled effect of early PCSK9 inhibitor administration. Nine RCTs and three cohort studies were included. RESULTS: Early PCSK9 inhibitor administration reduced the incidence of MI, ACS hospitalization, and revascularization at 6-18 months post-ACS. Although there was a drift towards reduced stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular death, no statistically significant reduction was observed. Additionally, PCSK9 inhibitors significantly enhanced lipid control at 4-12 weeks after index hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Early PCSK9 inhibitors initiation in ACS patients reduces MACE and improves lipid profiles. While the results propose promising benefits in terms of stroke and mortality, further research with longer follow-up is required for more decisive evidence.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Biomarkers , PCSK9 Inhibitors , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality , Acute Coronary Syndrome/blood , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Anticholesteremic Agents/adverse effects , Anticholesteremic Agents/administration & dosage , Anticholesteremic Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Drug Administration Schedule , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/blood , Dyslipidemias/diagnosis , Dyslipidemias/mortality , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Revascularization , Observational Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Serine Proteinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Serine Proteinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Serine Proteinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 72(8): 1142-1146, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078958

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: It was aimed to compare corneal endothelial changes during the initial 12-month period in which patients started using atorvastatin after a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Forty-six participants (group 1) who underwent cardiac angioplasty and stenting for ACS and started using 80 mg atorvastatin in the early period were included in the study. In the study, a control group comprising 71 healthy adults (group 2) was included. These individuals did not use medication for any known systemic disease, had never taken statins, had no history of ocular surgery, and did not have any cornea-related eye diseases. Baseline and 12th month endothelial evaluations of group 1 and 2 participants were compared using specular microscopy. RESULTS: There were 28 female and 18 male participants in group 1 and 48 female and 23 male participants in group 2 (P = 0.455). The mean baseline corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) was not significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (2471.4 ± 200 cells/mm2 vs 2428.2 ± 539.8 cells/mm2, P = 0.230). When the change between baseline and 12th month CECD was examined, the decrease in group 2 was significantly different from that in group 1 (-15,2 ± 31,9 and -44,8 ± 49,6, P = 0,002). Although the percentage of hexagonal cells decreased significantly in group 2 participants, no significant change was observed in group 1 (respectively; P < 0.001, P = 0.073). The endothelial cell coefficient of variation did not differ significantly in group 1 participants over a 1-year period (P = 0.192), and a significant increase was observed in group 2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that atorvastatin may have a positive effect on corneal endothelium cell density and morphology.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Atorvastatin , Endothelium, Corneal , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Humans , Atorvastatin/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Endothelium, Corneal/pathology , Endothelium, Corneal/drug effects , Middle Aged , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Cell Count , Time Factors , Aged , Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Adult
7.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 1811-1819, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828024

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Mechanistic studies showed that morphine may impair the antiplatelet effect of P2Y12 inhibitors. However, Several clinical studies with cardiovascular events as an outcome are contradictory, and the broader impact of this drug interaction on additional organ systems remains uncertain. With multisource data, this study sought to determine the effects of morphine interaction with P2Y12 inhibitors on major adverse outcomes comprehensively, and identify the warning indicators. Patients and Methods: Interaction signals were sought in 187,919 safety reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, utilizing reporting odds ratios (repOR). In a cohort of 5240 acute coronary syndrome patients, the analyses were validated, and the biological effects of warning indicators were further studied with Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis. Results: Potential risk of renal system adverse events in patients cotreated with morphine is significantly higher in FAERS (repOR 4.83, 95% CI 4.42-5.28, false discovery rate adjusted-P =3.55*10-209). The analysis of in-house patient cohorts validated these results with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (adjusted OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.20 to 2.26), and we also found a risk of myocardial infarction in patients treated with morphine (adjusted OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.14 to 2.11). The Morphine group exhibited diminished Plateletcrit (PCT) levels post-surgery and lower PCT levels were associated with an increased risk of AKI. Conclusion: The administration of morphine in patients treated with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors should be carefully evaluated. PCT may serve as a potential warning indicator for morphine-related renal injury.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Morphine , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists , Humans , Morphine/adverse effects , Morphine/administration & dosage , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage
9.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(6): JC64, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830214

ABSTRACT

SOURCE CITATION: Hong SJ, Lee SJ, Suh Y, et al; T-PASS (Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Patients Treated With New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Acute Coronary Syndrome) Investigators. Stopping aspirin within 1 month after stenting for ticagrelor monotherapy in acute coronary syndrome: the T-PASS randomized noninferiority trial. Circulation. 2024;149:562-573. 37878786.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Drug-Eluting Stents , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Ticagrelor , Ticagrelor/therapeutic use , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/surgery , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(12): e033791, 2024 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874073

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) intermediate and poor metabolizer patients exhibit diminished clopidogrel clinical effectiveness after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, outcome studies to date have lacked racial diversity. Thus, the impact of CYP2C19 genotype on cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with clopidogrel who identify as Black or African American remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adults among 5 institutions who self-identified as Black or African American, underwent PCI and clinical CYP2C19 genotyping, and were treated with clopidogrel were included. Data were abstracted from health records. Major atherothrombotic (composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, stent thrombosis, or revascularization for unstable angina) and bleeding event rates within 1 year after PCI were compared across CYP2C19 metabolizer groups using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for potential confounders and baseline variables meeting a threshold of P<0.10. The population included 567 Black patients treated with clopidogrel (median age, 62 years; 46% women; 70% with an acute coronary syndrome indication for PCI). Major atherothrombotic events rates were significantly higher among clopidogrel-treated intermediate and poor metabolizers (24 of 125 [19.2%]) versus patients treated with clopidogrel without a no function allele (43 of 442 [9.7%]; 35.1 versus 15.9 events per 100 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.20-3.33], P=0.008). Bleeding event rates were low overall (23 of 567 [4.1%]) and did not differ among the metabolizer groups. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with CYP2C19 intermediate and poor metabolizer phenotypes who are treated with clopidogrel exhibit increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes after PCI in a real-world clinical setting. Bleeding outcomes should be interpreted cautiously. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether genotype-guided use of prasugrel or ticagrelor in intermediate and poor metabolizers improves outcomes in Black patients undergoing PCI.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Clopidogrel , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 , Hemorrhage , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/ethnology , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Black or African American/genetics , Clopidogrel/adverse effects , Clopidogrel/therapeutic use , Coronary Artery Disease/ethnology , Coronary Artery Disease/genetics , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/metabolism , Genotype , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/genetics , Pharmacogenomic Variants , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 13(7): 559-562, 2024 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842355

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Cardiac troponin plays an essential role in the management of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, it is not clear whether troponin concentrations provide guidance regarding the initiation of prognostically beneficial cardiovascular medications [i.e. betablockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, and statins] in NSTE-ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Registry-based study investigating three NSTE-ACS cohorts (n = 43 075, 40 162, and 46 698) with elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations >14 ng/L. Cox proportional regression models with the addition of interaction terms were used to analyse the interrelations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentrations, new initiated medications with the respective three drug classes, and long-term risk of all-cause mortality and major adverse events (MAE). Betablockers were associated with risk reductions of 8 and 5% regarding all-cause mortality and MAE, respectively. There was no evidence of an interaction with hs-cTnT concentrations. RAAS inhibitors were associated with 13 and 8% risk reductions, respectively, with a weak interaction between hs-cTnT and MAE (Pinteraction = 0.016). However, no increasing prognostic benefit was noted at hs-cTnT concentrations >100 ng/L. Statins were associated with 38 and 32% risk reductions, respectively, with prognostic benefit across the entire range of hs-cTnT concentrations, and with a weak interaction regarding MAE (Pinteraction = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular medications provide different prognostic benefit in patients with NSTE-ACS with elevated hs-cTnT, and there was some evidence of greater treatment effects regarding MAE along with higher hs-cTnT concentrations. However, hs-cTnT appears only to have limited value overall for customizing such treatments.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Biomarkers , Registries , Troponin T , Humans , Troponin T/blood , Male , Female , Acute Coronary Syndrome/blood , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Middle Aged , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Follow-Up Studies , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Electrocardiography , Survival Rate/trends , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/blood , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 14516, 2024 06 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914608

ABSTRACT

Some previous observations suggest that a low platelet count is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, most of the data come from post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials and from studies including thrombocytopenia developed during hospital stay. Our aim was to assess the impact of low platelet count at admission on cardiovascular outcomes and treatment approach in patients hospitalized for ACS in a current real-life setting in Italy. Patients admitted to Italian coronary care units for ACS were enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry. Baseline clinical characteristics and treatment at discharge were recorded. Patients were followed-up at 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter. Low platelet count was defined as a count at admission < 150 > 100 k/µl or < 100 k/µL. Among 1894 enrolled patients, 157 (8.3%) had a platelet count < 150 > 100 k/µl and 30 (1.6%) < 100 k/µl. The median follow-up was 12.3 months (0.4-50.1). patients with low platelets were older (72 ± 10.4 vs 66 ± 12.4 years, p = 0.006), more frequently males (82.9 vs 72.1%, p = 0.001), hypertensive (90.0% vs 70.4%, p = 0.03), with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (17.1 vs 8.6%, p = 0.02), and peripheral arterial disease (11.5 vs 6.2% p = 0.01) and/or had a previous myocardial infarction (40 vs 18.7%, p = 0.008) and/or a PCI (14.6 vs 7.8%, p = 0.001) than patients with normal platelets. A slightly, but significantly, lower percentage of thrombocytopenic patients were treated with primary PCI (78.1 vs 84.4%, p = 0.04) and they were more frequently discharged on aspirin plus clopidogrel rather than aspirin plus newer P2Y12 antagonists (51.9 vs 65.4%, p = 0.01). MACE-free survival was significantly shorter in thrombocytopenic patients compared to patients with normal platelets (< 150 > 100 k/µl: 37.6 vs 41.8 months, p = 0.002; HR = 2.7, 95% CIs 1.4-5.2; < 100 k/µl: 31.7 vs 41.8 months, p = 0.01; HR = 6.5, 95% CIs 1.5-29.1). At multivariate analysis, low platelet count, age at enrollment, low glomerular filtration rate, low ejection fraction, a previous ischemic stroke and NVAF were independent predictors of MACE. A low platelet count at admission identifies a subgroup of ACS patients with a significantly increased risk of MACE and these patients should be managed with special care to prevent excess adverse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Registries , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/blood , Male , Female , Aged , Platelet Count , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Italy/epidemiology , Patient Admission
14.
Curr Atheroscler Rep ; 26(7): 231-248, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722473

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide a comprehensive summary of relevant studies and evidence concerning the utilization of different pharmacotherapeutic and revascularization strategies in managing coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome specifically in the older adult population. RECENT FINDINGS: Approximately 30% to 40% of hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome are older adults, among whom the majority of cardiovascular-related deaths occur. When compared to younger patients, these individuals generally experience inferior clinical outcomes. Most clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of various therapeutics have primarily enrolled patients under the age of 75, in addition to excluding those with geriatric complexities. In this review, we emphasize the need for a personalized and comprehensive approach to pharmacotherapy for coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome in older adults, considering concomitant geriatric syndromes and age-related factors to optimize treatment outcomes while minimizing potential risks and complications. In the realm of clinical practice, cardiovascular and geriatric risks are closely intertwined, with both being significant factors in determining treatments aimed at reducing negative outcomes and attaining health conditions most valued by older adults.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Coronary Artery Disease , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Aged , Aging , Age Factors
15.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(9): e034414, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, major society guidelines have recommended the use of newer P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel for those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. It is unclear what impact these recommendations had on clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: All percutaneous coronary intervention procedures (n=534 210) for acute coronary syndrome in England and Wales (April 1, 2010, to March 31, 2022) were retrospectively analyzed, stratified by choice of preprocedural P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and prasugrel). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine odds ratios of receipt of ticagrelor and prasugrel (versus clopidogrel) over time, and predictors of their receipt. Overall, there was a significant increase in receipt of newer P2Y12 inhibitors from 2010 to 2020 (2022 versus 2010: ticagrelor odds ratio, 8.12 [95% CI, 7.67-8.60]; prasugrel odds ratio, 6.14 [95% CI, 5.53-6.81]), more so in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction than non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome indication. The most significant increase in odds of receipt of prasugrel was observed between 2020 and 2022 (P<0.001), following a decline/plateau in its use in earlier years (2011-2019). In contrast, the odds of receipt of ticagrelor significantly increased in earlier years (2012-2017, Ptrend<0.001), after which the trend was stable (Ptrend=0.093). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 13-year-period, there has been a significant increase in use of newer P2Y12 inhibitors, although uptake of prasugrel use remained significantly lower than ticagrelor. Earlier society guidelines (pre-2017) were associated with the highest rates of ticagrelor use for non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction cases while the ISAR-REACT 5 (Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial and later society guidelines were associated with higher prasugrel use, mainly for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction indication.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Clopidogrel , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prasugrel Hydrochloride , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists , Ticagrelor , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/surgery , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/trends , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Ticagrelor/therapeutic use , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Aged , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Wales , Clopidogrel/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , England , Guideline Adherence/trends , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
16.
Am J Cardiol ; 224: 1-8, 2024 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734399

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have shown similar safety and efficacy of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12i) monotherapy when compared with standard DAPT. However, the optimal DAPT duration and regimen in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention is still unclear. Online databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating P2Y12i monotherapy after short DAPT (≤3 months) versus standard DAPT (≥12 months) in ACS patients. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target-vessel revascularization, and major bleeding. Random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Six randomized controlled trials with a total of 23,884 patients (n = 11,904 P2Y12i monotherapy, n = 11,980 standard DAPT) were included. Compared with standard DAPT, P2Y12i monotherapy after short DAPT was associated with similar odds of all-cause death (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.12, p = 0.26) and cardiovascular death (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.29, p = 0.29) at 1 year. Similarly, there were no significant differences in rates of myocardial infarction (OR 1.09, 0.83 to 1.43, p = 0.53), stent thrombosis (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.67, p = 0.70) and target-vessel revascularization (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.01, p = 0.07) between the P2Y12i monotherapy and standard DAPT arms. The P2Y12i monotherapy group had significantly lower major bleeding (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.64, p < 0.001) when compared with standard DAPT. In conclusion, in patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, P2Y12i monotherapy after short DAPT significantly reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic risk when compared with standard DAPT therapy.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists , Humans , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Cause of Death/trends , Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy/methods , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
17.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(11): e031606, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804216

ABSTRACT

Ticagrelor is a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor approved for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes, coronary artery disease, and low-moderate risk acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor on ischemic and bleeding outcomes for different indications and with varying treatment approaches. As a result, there is a large body of clinical evidence demonstrating different degrees of net clinical benefit compared with other platelet inhibitor drugs based on indication, patient characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment duration, and other factors. We provide a review of the major trials of ticagrelor in the context of other randomized trials of clopidogrel and prasugrel to organize the volume of available information, elevate corroborating and conflicting data, and identify potential gaps as areas for further exploration of optimal antiplatelet treatment.


Subject(s)
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists , Ticagrelor , Humans , Ticagrelor/therapeutic use , Ticagrelor/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/chemically induced
18.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(10)2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791422

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapies may be insufficient in high-risk cardiovascular patients and depends on the genetic variability of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Customizing statin therapy, including treatment with atorvastatin, may improve clinical outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of guidelines allowing the prediction of the therapeutic efficacy of lipid-lowering statin therapy. This study aimed to determine the effects of clinically significant gene variants of CYP2C19 on atorvastatin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes. In total, 92 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were sequenced for target regions within the CYP2C19 gene on the Illumina Miniseq system. The CYP2C19 poor metabolizer phenotype (carriers of CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*4, and CYP2C19*8 alleles) was detected in 29% of patients. These patients had significantly lower responses to treatment with atorvastatin than patients with the normal metabolizer phenotype. CYP2C19-metabolizing phenotype, patient age, and smoking increased the odds of undertreatment in patients (∆LDL-C (mmol/L) < 1). These results revealed that the CYP2C19 phenotype may significantly impact atorvastatin therapy personalization in patients requiring LDL lipid-lowering therapy.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Atorvastatin , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19 , Humans , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Atorvastatin/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/genetics , Middle Aged , Aged , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Alleles
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12369, 2024 05 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811592

ABSTRACT

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of high-dose intravenous anakinra treatment on the development of thrombotic events in severe and critical COVID-19 patients. This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary referral center in Aksaray, Turkey. The study population consisted of two groups as follows; the patients receiving high-dose intravenous anakinra (anakinra group) added to background therapy and the patients treated with standard of care (SoC) as a historical control group. Age, gender, mcHIS scores, and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary heart disease of the patients were determined as the variables to be matched. We included 114 patients in SoC and 139 patients in the Anakinra group in the study. Development of any thromboembolic event (5% vs 12.3%, p = 0.038; OR 4.3) and PTE (2.9% vs 9.6%, p = 0.023; OR 5.1) were lower in the Anakinra group than SoC. No patient experienced cerebrovascular accident and/or clinically evident deep venous thrombosis both in two arms. After 1:1 PS matching, 88 patients in SoC and 88 patients in the Anakinra group were matched and included in the analysis. In survival analysis, the development of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary thromboembolism, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were higher in SoC compared to Anakinra. Survival rate was also lower in patients with SoC arm than Anakinra in patients who had any thromboembolic event as well as ACS. In our study, the development of thrombosis was associated with hyperinflammation in patients with severe and critical COVID-19. Intravenous high-dose anakinra treatment decreases both venous and arterial events in patients with severe and critical COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein , Propensity Score , Venous Thrombosis , Humans , Male , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/administration & dosage , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/therapeutic use , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/adverse effects , Female , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Aged , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Administration, Intravenous , Turkey/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL