Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 13.450
Filter
1.
Arq Bras Cir Dig ; 37: e1810, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the preference for multimodal treatment for gastric cancer, abandonment of chemotherapy treatment as well as the need for upfront surgery in obstructed patients brings negative impacts on the treatment. The difficulty of accessing treatment in specialized centers in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) scenario is an aggravating factor. AIMS: To identify advantages, prognostic factors, complications, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies survival in gastric cancer treatment in SUS setting. METHODS: The retrospective study included 81 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment according to INT0116 trial (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy), CLASSIC trial (adjuvant chemotherapy), FLOT4-AIO trial (perioperative chemotherapy), and surgery with curative intention (R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy) in a single cancer center between 2015 and 2020. Individuals with other histological types, gastric stump, esophageal cancer, other treatment protocols, and stage Ia or IV were excluded. RESULTS: Patients were grouped into FLOT4-AIO (26 patients), CLASSIC (25 patients), and INT0116 (30 patients). The average age was 61 years old. More than 60% of patients had pathological stage III. The treatment completion rate was 56%. The pathological complete response rate of the FLOT4-AIO group was 7.7%. Among the prognostic factors that impacted overall survival and disease-free survival were alcoholism, early postoperative complications, and anatomopathological status pN2 and pN3. The 3-year overall survival rate was 64.9%, with the CLASSIC subgroup having the best survival (79.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy for gastric cancer varies according to the need for initial surgery. The CLASSIC subgroup had better overall survival and disease-free survival. The INT0116 regimen also protected against mortality, but not with statistical significance. Although FLOT4-AIO is the preferred treatment, the difficulty in carrying out neoadjuvant treatment in SUS scenario had a negative impact on the results due to the criticality of food intake and worse treatment tolerance.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Brazil/epidemiology , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Prognosis , National Health Programs , Gastrectomy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Staging , Perioperative Care
2.
Arq Bras Cir Dig ; 37: e1811, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958347

ABSTRACT

Molecular medicine opened new horizons in understanding disease mechanisms and discovering target interventions. The wider availability of DNA and RNA sequencing, immunohistochemical analysis, proteomics, and other molecular tests changed how physicians manage diseases. The gastric cancer molecular classification proposed by The Cancer Genome Atlas Program divides gastric adenocarcinomas into four subtypes. However, the available targets and/or immunotherapies approved for clinical use seem to be dissociated from these molecular subtypes. Until a more reliable interpretation of the stupendous amount of data provided by the molecular classifications is presented, the clinical guidelines will rely on available actionable targets and approved therapies to guide clinicians in conducting cancer management in the era of molecular therapies.


Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/classification , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/classification , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy
3.
J Gastric Cancer ; 24(3): 267-279, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960886

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA) remains controversial. We evaluated the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with locally advanced GEJA according to the histological type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients with locally advanced GEJA who underwent curative-intent surgical resection between 2010 and 2020. Perioperative therapies as well as clinicopathologic, surgical, and survival data were collected. The results of endoscopy and histopathological examinations were assessed for Siewert and Lauren classifications. RESULTS: Among the 58 patients included in this study, 44 (76%) were clinical stage III, and all received neoadjuvant therapy (72% chemoradiation, 41% chemotherapy, 14% both chemoradiation and chemotherapy). Tumor locations were evenly distributed by Siewert Classification (33% Siewert-I, 40% Siewert-II, and 28% Siewert-III). Esophagogastrectomy (EG) was performed for 47 (81%) patients and total gastrectomy (TG) for 11 (19%) patients. All TG patients received D2 lymphadenectomy compared to 10 (21%) EG patients. Histopathological examination showed the presence of 64% intestinal-type and 36% diffuse-type histology. The frequencies of diffuse-type histology were similar among Siewert groups (37% Siewert-I, 36% Siewert-II, and 33% Siewert-III). Regardless of Siewert type and compared to intestinal-type, diffuse histology was associated with increased intraabdominal recurrence rates (P=0.03) and decreased overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.33; P=0.02). With a median follow-up of 31.2 months, 29 (50%) patients had a recurrence, and the median overall survival was 50.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Present in equal proportions among Siewert types of esophageal and gastric cancer, a diffuse-type histology was associated with high intraabdominal recurrence rates and poor survival. Histopathological evaluation should be considered in addition to anatomic location in the determination of multimodal GEJA treatment strategies.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagogastric Junction , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/classification , Female , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/classification , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Middle Aged , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Gastrectomy , Adult , Survival Rate , Esophagectomy , Aged, 80 and over
4.
In Vivo ; 38(4): 1973-1983, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936897

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Distinguishing ovarian metastasis of usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA) from primary ovarian tumors is often challenging because of several overlapping features. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients with metastatic ovarian UEA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological information was collected from eight patients with metastatic ovarian UEA. Immunostaining was also performed. RESULTS: Most patients presented with adnexal masses that were suspected to be primary ovarian tumors. All examined cases showed block p16 positivity in paired primary and metastatic tumors. Five patients who completed post-operative chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) did not experience recurrence. In contrast, one patient who refused further treatment after the first CCRT cycle experienced ovarian and peritoneal metastases. One patient with isolated ovarian metastasis left untreated and developed peritoneal metastasis during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients with UEA who received proper management for ovarian metastases showed favorable outcomes. Given that ovarian metastatic UEA can mimic primary ovarian borderline tumor or carcinoma of the mucinous or endometrioid type, pathologists should be aware of this unusual but distinctive morphology to avoid misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Endometrioid , Ovarian Neoplasms , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/pathology , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/therapy , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/secondary , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/therapy , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/virology , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Neoplasm Metastasis , Human Papillomavirus Viruses
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2417625, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888920

ABSTRACT

Importance: Preoperative chemo(radio)therapy is increasingly used in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, leading to pathological complete response (pCR) in a small subset of patients. However, multicenter studies with in-depth data about pCR are lacking. Objective: To investigate the incidence, outcome, and risk factors of pCR after preoperative chemo(radio)therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational, international, multicenter cohort study assessed all consecutive patients with pathology-proven localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection after 2 or more cycles of chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) in 19 centers from 8 countries (January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018). Data collection was performed from February 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022, and analyses from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Median follow-up was 19 months. Exposures: Preoperative chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy) followed by resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: The incidence of pCR (defined as absence of vital tumor cells in the sampled pancreas specimen after resection), its association with OS from surgery, and factors associated with pCR. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) and pCR were investigated with Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, respectively. Results: Overall, 1758 patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [9] years; 879 [50.0%] male) were studied. The rate of pCR was 4.8% (n = 85), and pCR was associated with OS (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.83). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 95%, 82%, and 63% in patients with pCR vs 80%, 46%, and 30% in patients without pCR, respectively (P < .001). Factors associated with pCR included preoperative multiagent chemotherapy other than (m)FOLFIRINOX ([modified] leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin) (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.87), preoperative conventional radiotherapy (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.00-4.10), preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (OR, 8.91; 95% CI, 4.17-19.05), radiologic response (OR, 13.00; 95% CI, 7.02-24.08), and normal(ized) serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 after preoperative therapy (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.79-7.89). Conclusions and Relevance: This international, retrospective cohort study found that pCR occurred in 4.8% of patients with resected localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemo(radio)therapy. Although pCR does not reflect cure, it is associated with improved OS, with a doubled 5-year OS of 63% compared with 30% in patients without pCR. Factors associated with pCR related to preoperative chemo(radio)therapy regimens and anatomical and biological disease response features may have implications for treatment strategies that require validation in prospective studies because they may not universally apply to all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Cohort Studies , Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use , Pancreatectomy
6.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 27(6): 608-614, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901994

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the correlation between the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and long-term survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods: Clinical and pathological data of 487 patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma from October 2004 to April 2014 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed and the impact of NAR score on prognosis studied. Disease-free-survival (DFS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and survivals compared using the log-rank test. Cox models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to evaluate the predictive capability of NAR and tumor regression grade scores for the risk of 10-year postoperative recurrence and metastasis. The Delong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance of the two scores. Results: Of the 487 patients included in the study, 166 were men (34.1%). The median age was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 46-63). All patients completed adequate preoperative chemoradiotherapy and underwent R0 resection.The median interval between the end of chemoradiotherapy and surgery was 51 days (IQR: 44-58). Post-chemoradiotherapy downstaging occurred in 329 patients (67.6%). Tumor regression grades (TRGs) were 1-2 in 246 patients (50.5%) and 3-4 in 241 patients (49.5%). A total of 394 patients (80.9%) received postoperative chemotherapy. NAR scores were <8 in 182 patients (37.4%), 8-16 in 180 (37.0%), and >16 in 125 (25.6%). The median follow-up time was 111.5 months (IQR: 70.7-133.7 months). One hundred and thirteen patients died of rectal cancer, among whom 13 patients developed local recurrence, 88 patients developed distant metastasis, and 12 patients had unknown recurrence patterns. The 10-year DFS and overall survival rate of f the whole group were 68.9% and 71.5% respectively. The 10-year DFS rates for patients with NAR scores <8, 8-16, and >16 were 85.1%, 80.5%, and 66.4%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the Dixon operation (HR=0.606, 95%CI: 0.408-0.902, P=0.014), and >16 (HR=2.569, 95%CI: 1.559-4.233, P<0.001) were independent predictors of the 10-year DFS of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (P<0.05 for all). In the entire patient cohort, the AUC of the receiver operating characteristic curve for NAR score predicting 10-year recurrence and metastasis was 0.67 (95%CI: 0.62-0.72), whereas the AUC for TRG score was 0.54 (95%CI: 0.49-0.60). The two scores differed significantly in accuracy (Z=-4.06, P<0.001), the NAR score being a significantly better predictor of risk of 10-year recurrence and metastasis than the TRG score. Conclusion: The NAR score is a reliable predictor of 10-year DFS in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery.


Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Aged , Prognosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Adult , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Rectum/surgery , Chemoradiotherapy , Proportional Hazards Models
8.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 668, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824512

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal cancers represent one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. Strikingly, the incidence of Early Onset Gastrointestinal Cancer (EOGIC) has been rising during the last decades and changes in lifestyle and environmental exposure seem to play a role. EOGIC has been defined as a different entity compared to on-average gastrointestinal cancer, with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. Inherent to the particularities of younger age, there is an unmet need for a tailored approach for the management of these patients. The TEOGIC proposes a comprehensive study to characterize EOGIC patients in the northern of Spain. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed new diagnosis of colorectal, gastroesophageal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma will be considered for two cohorts: EOGIC (≤ 50 years old) and non-EOGIC (60-75 years old), with a ratio of 1:2. Two hundred and forty patients will be recruited in 4 Public Hospitals from northern Spain. After receiving unified informed consent, demographic and clinical data of the patients will be collected in a REDCap database. Lifestyle related data will be obtained in questionnaires assessing diet, physical activity and the general quality of life of the patients before diagnosis. Biological samples prior to any onco-specific treatment will be obtained for the analyses of circulating inflammatory proteins, gut microbiota, and the proteome of the tumor microenvironment. Histologic characteristics and routine biomarkers will be also collected. Thereafter, data will be integrated and analyzed to assess tumor specific, pan-tumor and sex-associated differential characteristics of EOGIC. DISCUSSION: The underlying risk factors and differential characteristics of EOGIC remain poorly studied, particularly in our geographical area. Although limited by the exploratory nature and the small sample size estimated to be recruited, TEOGIC represents the first attempt to comprehensively characterize these young patients, and thus attend to their special needs. Findings derived from this study could contribute to raise awareness and preventive behaviors in the population. In parallel, molecular studies could lead to the identification of potential novel non-invasive biomarkers and therapeutic targets that would help in the development of the tailored clinical management of these patients, focusing on screening programs for early diagnosis and precision medicine.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Humans , Spain/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Aged , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Age of Onset , Life Style , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Tumor Microenvironment , Quality of Life , Incidence , Biomarkers, Tumor , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
9.
BMJ ; 385: e074962, 2024 06 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830686

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/diagnosis , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology
10.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 274, 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853274

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epididymal tumors, especially malignant tumors, have low incidence and are rare in our clinical work. However, they may progress quickly and have poor prognosis. For such rare clinical cases with extremely low incidence rates, and as they are prone to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis and have a very poor prognosis, clinical workers need to pay special attention and consider the possibility of primary epididymal malignant tumors. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old Chinese male patient from Asia was admitted due to scrotal pain. Upon examination, an abnormal lesion was found in the right epididymal region. After thorough evaluation, surgical resection was performed, and the postoperative pathological result confirmed the presence of epididymal adenocarcinoma. After further ruling out secondary lesions, primary epididymal adenocarcinoma was considered. Right retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was performed under laparoscopic for treatment, and 1/11 lymph node metastasis was detected after surgery. The patient is currently under close follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The number of clinical cases of primary epididymal malignant tumors is very limited, there is currently no standardized diagnosis and treatment process, and there is a lack of systematic evaluation methods regarding the effectiveness of different treatment options such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. In addition, the outcome is difficult to predict. In this article, we reviewed relevant literature and systematically elaborated on the diagnosis and treatment of epididymal malignant tumors, hoping to provide useful information for relevant experts.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Epididymis , Lymph Node Excision , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Epididymis/pathology , Epididymis/surgery , Genital Neoplasms, Male/therapy , Genital Neoplasms, Male/diagnosis , Genital Neoplasms, Male/pathology , Genital Neoplasms, Male/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis , Treatment Outcome
11.
Exp Oncol ; 46(1): 53-60, 2024 05 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The non-operative management of rectal adenocarcinoma (RA) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) has gained increasing attention. The "Watch and Wait" ("W&W") strategy allows one to avoid surgery-related reduction in the quality of life due to permanent pelvic organ dysfunction or irreversible stoma. Still, the oncological safety of this strategy is under evaluation. AIM: To share a single-center experience of the "W&W" strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective analysis of 125 patients who received nCRT in 2016-2021 was performed. Patients who met the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO, 2017) criteria of clinical complete response (cCR) and received non-operative management were analyzed. RESULTS: Ten patients (8%) were re-staged after nCRT as cCR and followed the "W&W" strategy. Patients' characteristics: 7 female, 3 male; mean age 67.3 years. Tumor characteristics: pre-treatment N+ was present in 7 cases; G1 adenocarcinoma in a majority of cases; mean tumor distance from the anal verge - 5.85 cm; mean tumor circumference - 71%; mean tumor length - 3.87 cm. The mean follow-up time was 30 months. Local regrowth or/and distant metastases developed in 3 cases. The 2-year disease-free survival was 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients following the "W&W" strategy have benefited. However, to reduce the number of relapses, it is necessary to perform a more careful selection of patients.


Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Female , Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Watchful Waiting , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged, 80 and over
12.
Saudi Med J ; 45(6): 639-642, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830651

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current real-world treatment landscape, sequence of therapies, and outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study for PC patients diagnosed at King Abdullah Medical City Cancer Center in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2011 and December 2021. Data extracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients with PC, with a mean age of 70 years and body mass index of 27. Among them, 274 (99%) had no family history of cancer, while 164 (58%) had hypertension and 125 (44%) had diabetes mellitus. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology, found in 275 (97%) patients, with 99 (35%) having a Gleason score of 9. Notably, 184 (65%) patients presented with metastatic disease, and 147 (52%) with bone metastasis. While 198 (70%) patients underwent surgery, 184 (65%) did not receive radiotherapy. The most common first-line metastatic therapy was abiraterone in 23 (8%) patients, followed by enzalutamide in 7 (2.5%). During the study period, 167 (59%) patients survived, with an average treatment duration of 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with PC. The findings of this study highlight the importance of adhering to treatment standards and making informed clinical decisions.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Grading , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Prostatectomy , Cohort Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Benzamides
13.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 7(6): e2101, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831124

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare and aggressive subtype of gastric cancer (GC), accounting for less than 1% of all cases. It is characterized by frequent liver metastasis recurrence and a poorer prognosis than conventional GC. However, established treatment guidelines for HAS are currently not available.In this report, we present the results of a clinicopathological study of 19 patients diagnosed with HAS, including seven patients with liver metastasis, conducted by the Hiroshima Surgical Study Group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO) between 2016 and 2018. AIMS: The aim of the study was to retrospectively observe the outcomes of HAS with gastrectomy and hepatectomy for liver metastasis and determine relevant prognostic factor. We also examined the criteria and outcomes of hepatectomy for liver metastasis and aimed to suggest the optimal treatment for HAS, including chemotherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2147 patients underwent gastrectomy for GC at HiSCO-affiliated institutions during the study period; 19 patients, all male with a mean age of 70.9 years, were diagnosed with HAS by hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining. Patients underwent gastrectomy at varying pathological stages: six at Stage I, three at Stage II, seven at Stage III, and three at Stage IV. Ten patients received postoperative chemotherapy and the 5-year survival rate was 67.7% after gastrectomy. Among the seven patients with pre or postoperative liver metastasis, five patients underwent hepatectomy. Although one patient had recurrence, the 3-year survival rate was 100% after hepatectomy. CONCLUSION: Contrary to previous reports suggesting a 3-year survival rate of approximmately 30% for HAS, our findings indicate that the prognosis for HAS may not be as poor as reported previously. This study contributes valuable insights into the management and potential treatment strategies for HAS.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Gastrectomy , Hepatectomy , Liver Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Survival Rate , Aged, 80 and over , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Female
14.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 151, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849854

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare gastrointestinal malignancy forwhich survival is hampered by late diagnosis, complex responses to treatment, and poor prognosis. Accurate prognostic tools are crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with SBA and compare it to traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2,064 patients diagnosed with SBA between 2010 and 2020 from the SEER database. Patients were randomly assigned to training and validation cohorts (7:3 ratio). Kaplan‒Meier survival analysis, Cox multivariate regression, and nomograms were constructed for analysis of 3-year and 5-year CSS. The performance of the nomograms was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression identified sex, age at diagnosis, marital status, tumor site, pathological grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, surgery, retrieval of regional lymph nodes (RORLN), and chemotherapy as independent covariates associated with CSS. In both the training and validation cohorts, the developed nomograms demonstrated superior performance to that of the AJCC staging system, with C-indices of 0.764 and 0.759, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values obtained by ROC analysis for 3-year and 5-year CSS prediction significantly surpassed those of the AJCC model. The nomograms were validated using calibration and decision curves, confirming their clinical utility and superior predictive accuracy. The NRI and IDI indicated the enhanced predictive capability of the nomogram model. CONCLUSION: The SEER-based nomogram offers a significantly superior ability to predict CSS in SBA patients, supporting its potential application in clinical decision-making and personalized approaches to managing SBA to improve survival outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Intestinal Neoplasms , Nomograms , SEER Program , Humans , Male , Female , SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Aged , Intestinal Neoplasms/mortality , Intestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Intestinal Neoplasms/therapy , Intestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prognosis , Follow-Up Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Intestine, Small/pathology , ROC Curve , Adult , Retrospective Studies
15.
Cancer Control ; 31: 10732748241262184, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38868954

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to employ a competing risk model based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify prognostic factors for elderly individuals with sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma (SCA) and compare them with the classic Cox proportional hazards model. METHODS: We extracted data from elderly patients diagnosed with SCA registered in the SEER database between 2010 and 2015. Univariate analysis was conducted using cumulative incidence functions and Gray's test, while multivariate analysis was performed using both the Fine-Gray and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among the 10,712 eligible elderly patients diagnosed with SCA, 5595 individuals passed away: 2987 due to sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma and 2608 from other causes. The results of one-way Gray's test showed that age, race, marital status, AJCC stage, differentiation grade, tumor size, surgical status, liver metastasis status, lung metastasis status, brain metastasis status, radiotherapy status, and chemotherapy status all affected the prognosis of SCA (P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that sex, age, race, marital status, and surgical status affected the prognosis of SCA (P < .05). Multifactorial Fine-Gray analysis revealed that key factors influencing the prognosis of SCA patients include age, race, marital status, AJCC stage, grade classification, surgical status, tumor size, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, and chemotherapy status (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Data from the SEER database were used to more accurately estimate CIFs for sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma-specific mortality and prognostic factors using competing risk models.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , SEER Program , Sigmoid Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Prognosis , Sigmoid Neoplasms/pathology , Sigmoid Neoplasms/mortality , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors
16.
PeerJ ; 12: e17629, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38938617

ABSTRACT

While the significance of immunogenic cell death (ICD) in oncology is acknowledged, its specific impact on colorectal carcinoma remains underexplored. In this study, we delved into the role of ICD in colorectal carcinoma, a topic not yet comprehensively explored. A novel ICD quantification system was developed to forecast patient outcomes and the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Utilizing single-cell sequencing, we constructed an ICD score within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and examined immunogenic cell death related genes (ICDRGs). Using data from TCGA and GEO, we discovered two separate molecular subcategories within 1,184 patients diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma/rectum adenocarcinoma (COADREAD). The ICD score was established by principal component analysis (PCA), which classified patients into groups with low and high ICD scores. Further validation in three independent cohorts confirmed the model's accuracy in predicting immunotherapy success. Patients with higher ICD scores exhibited a "hot" immune phenotype and showed increased responsiveness to immunotherapy. Key genes in the model, such as AKAP12, CALB2, CYR61, and MEIS2, were found to enhance COADREAD cell proliferation, invasion, and PD-L1 expression. These insights offered a new avenue for anti-tumor strategies by targeting ICD, marking advances in colorectal carcinoma treatment.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Immunogenic Cell Death , Immunotherapy , Tumor Microenvironment , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/immunology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Immunogenic Cell Death/drug effects , Prognosis , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Tumor Microenvironment/genetics , Immunotherapy/methods , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Male , Female , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/immunology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Principal Component Analysis , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
17.
World J Surg ; 48(7): 1759-1766, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38794790

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved in 10%-30% of rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Residual mucosal abnormalities, which make patients ineligible for nonoperative management, may not be an accurate indicator of the pCR. The purpose of this study was to report the gross findings of rectal cancer patients with pathological complete responses. METHODS: This study was conducted at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. A total of 130 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by surgical resection between March 2007, and March 2017, with a surgical pathology report of pCR, were included. Patients' demographics and pretreatment tumor characteristics were collected from the medical records. Data regarding residual mucosal abnormalities were extracted from postoperative surgical pathology reports. Abnormal findings were reported as "ulcer" or " non-ulcerative lesion". RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients (88.5%; 95% CI: 81.7%-93.4%) had at least one abnormal finding in the gross examination, including ulcer or non-ulcerative lesion (any mucosal abnormalities other than ulcers, including polyps, telangiectasia, etc.). Patients with higher-stage tumors had a higher chance of having an ulcerative lesion (p = 0.05). Younger patients tended to have deeper layers of involvement (p = 0.013). Patients with different gross findings were not significantly different regarding baseline characteristics, except for the pretreatment stage, where patients with a higher stage had higher odds of having ulcerative lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Most rectal cancer patients achieving a pCR exhibit abnormalities on gross examination. The higher pretreatment stages were significantly associated with gross abnormalities especially ulcers.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Iran , Neoplasm Staging , Treatment Outcome , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies
18.
Aging (Albany NY) ; 16(9): 7596-7621, 2024 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742936

ABSTRACT

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), a frequently encountered and highly lethal malignancy of the digestive system, has been the focus of intensive research regarding its prognosis. The intricate immune microenvironment plays a pivotal role in the pathological progression of COAD; nevertheless, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This study aims to explore the immune gene expression patterns in COAD, construct a robust prognostic model, and delve into the molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for COAD liver metastasis, thereby providing critical support for individualized treatment strategies and prognostic evaluation. Initially, we curated a comprehensive dataset by screening 2600 immune-related genes (IRGs) from the ImmPort and InnateDB databases, successfully obtaining a rich data resource. Subsequently, the COAD patient cohort was classified using the non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) algorithm, enabling accurate categorization. Continuing on, utilizing the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) method, we analyzed the top 5000 genes with the smallest p-values among the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between immune subtypes. Through this rigorous screening process, we identified the gene modules with the strongest correlation to the COAD subpopulation, and the intersection of genes in these modules with DEGs (COAD vs COAD vs Normal colon tissue) is referred to as Differentially Expressed Immune Genes Associated with COAD (DEIGRC). Employing diverse bioinformatics methodologies, we successfully developed a prognostic model (DPM) consisting of six genes derived from the DEIGRC, which was further validated across multiple independent datasets. Not only does this predictive model accurately forecast the prognosis of COAD patients, but it also provides valuable insights for formulating personalized treatment regimens. Within the constructed DPM, we observed a downregulation of CALB2 expression levels in COAD tissues, whereas NOXA1, KDF1, LARS2, GSR, and TIMP1 exhibited upregulated expression levels. These genes likely play indispensable roles in the initiation and progression of COAD and thus represent potential therapeutic targets for patient management. Furthermore, our investigation into the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for COAD liver metastasis revealed associations with relevant processes such as fat digestion and absorption, cancer gene protein polysaccharides, and nitrogen metabolism. Consequently, genes including CAV1, ANXA1, CPS1, EDNRA, and GC emerge as promising candidates as therapeutic targets for COAD liver metastasis, thereby providing crucial insights for future clinical practices and drug development. In summary, this study uncovers the immune gene expression patterns in COAD, establishes a robust prognostic model, and elucidates the molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for COAD liver metastasis, thereby possessing significant theoretical and clinical implications. These findings are anticipated to offer substantial support for both the treatment and prognosis management of COAD patients.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Algorithms , Colonic Neoplasms , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Immunotherapy , Humans , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Colonic Neoplasms/immunology , Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/immunology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Prognosis , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Regulatory Networks , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Transcriptome , Tumor Microenvironment/genetics , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Databases, Genetic , Computational Biology
19.
World Neurosurg ; 187: e568-e576, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704143

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases from esophageal cancer (BMEC) are rare and aggressive, with limited literature on optimal treatment modalities and a standard of care yet to be established. The objective of this study was to systematically review existing literature and perform a retrospective analysis of our institution's patients to evaluate the influence of different treatment modalities on patient outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and a retrospective review of our institutional experience with BMEC were both conducted. Data based on mean survival,histology, metastasis location, and treatment modality were abstracted. RESULTS: A total of 48 studies representing 136 patients with BMEC were identified, in addition to the 11 patients treated at our institution. There were a total of 100 males (12 unreported), with a median age of 62.2 at diagnosis in our systematic review, along with 8 males with a median age of 62 in our institutional review. Collectively, survival rates observed based on histology were not similar (squamous cell carcinoma: 9.2 months, adenocarcinoma: 13.4 months), however, based on treatment modalities (surgery: 11.6 months, radiation: 10.4 months, chemotherapy: 12.3 months), and metastasis location (supratentorial: 10.5 months, infratentorial: 9.9 months), the survival times were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests that causes of death were often independent of brain metastases highlighting the need for further studies on early detection and prevention of primary esophageal cancer, as well as improved treatment modalities for BMECs.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Female , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/therapy
20.
Eur J Cancer ; 206: 114128, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38805957

ABSTRACT

Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a rare digestive cancer, often diagnosed at a late stage and harbours a poor prognosis. The arrival of immunotherapy has changed the prognosis of many neoplasia, including digestive adenocarcinomas with MSI-H status. Hereby, we describe three cases of MSI-H locally advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant treatment with a PD1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab. A partial metabolic and endoscopic response was observed in all patients after 2 cycles. Duodenopancreatectomy was performed at the end of treatment (4-6 cycles), and anatomopathological analysis demonstrated pathological complete response in all patients. Our case series paves the way for prospectively exploring neoadjuvant immunotherapy in duodenal MSI-H adenocarcinoma and raises the question of organ sparing surgery in case of complete clinical response as observed in gastric and colo-rectal adenocarcinomas.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Duodenal Neoplasms , Microsatellite Instability , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Duodenal Neoplasms/genetics , Duodenal Neoplasms/pathology , Duodenal Neoplasms/therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Female , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...