TICRR as a potential prognostic biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma: A comprehensive analysis using TCGA database.

To investigate the role of TopBP1-interacting checkpoint and replication regulator (TICRR) in the tumorigenesis and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and logistic regression were utilized to analyze the relationship between clinical characteristics and TICRR expression in LUAD from TCGA dataset. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regressions were used to assess the impact of TICRR impact on prognosis. ROC curves and nomograms were generated to further evaluate the relationship between TICRR expression and the risk of LUAD. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted on TCGA dataset, and ssGSEA was employed to investigate the association between TICRR and immune infiltrates. The results showed that high TICRR expression was significantly associated with various clinical factors including gender, age, pathological stage, T stage, N stage, M stage, outcome of primary therapy and smoking status. ROC curves also demonstrated that TICRR was a promising biomarker for molecular pathology diagnosis in LUAD patients (AUC = 0.952). Further analysis using gene ontology (GO) term enrichment and GSEA revealed an abnormal correlation between TICRR expression and cell division. Interestingly, ssGSEA analysis showed that TICRR expression correlated with multiple immune cell types, such as Th2 cell, TFH cell, mast cell, iDC, eosinophils, and dendritic cell. Lastly, the KM-plotters indicated that LUAD patients with high TICRR expression obtained worse life expectancy (P < .001). TICRR has proven to be a valuable tool in predicting disease progression and prognosis in patients with LUAD, thereby establishing itself as a fitting biomarker for forecasting overall survival (OS) of LUAD patients.

Exploring the potential biological significance of KDELR family genes in lung adenocarcinoma.

The Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu receptor (KDELR) family genes play critical roles in a variety of biological processes in different tumors. Our study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential roles of KDELRs in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Utilizing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, as well as clinical samples, we conducted a series of analyses and validations using R software tools and various online resources. The results showed that KDELR family genes and proteins were highly expressed and associated with a poor prognosis of LUAD. Promoter hypomethylation and the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network of PCAT6/hsa-miR-326/KDELR1 might be potential causes of aberrant KDELR1 overexpression in LUAD. Three key Transcription factors (TFs) (SPI1, EP300, and MAZ) and a TFs-miRNAs-KDELRs network (involving 11 TFs) might be involved in modulating KDELRs expression abnormalities. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) indicated enrichment of genes highly expressing KDELR1, KDELR2, and KDELR3 in MTORC1_SIGNALING, P53_PATHWAY, and ANGIOGENESIS. Negative correlations between KDELRs expression and CD8 + T cell infiltration, as well as CTLA-4 expression. Our multiple analyses suggested that the KDELRs are important signaling molecules in LUAD. These results provided novel insights for developing prognostic markers and novel therapies of LUAD.

FKBP3, a poor prognostic indicator, promotes the progression of LUAD via regulating ferroptosis and immune infiltration.

BACKGROUND: Ferroptosis was reported to possess the therapeutic potentials in various human cancers. In the present study, we explored the expression, clinical significance and the molecular mechanism of FK506 binding protein 3 (FKBP3) in the progression of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Cox regression was performed to obtain the prognosis related to differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in LUAD datasets from TCGA. We also downloaded the ferroptosis-related gene datasets from GeneCards. Venn diagram was performed to find the intersecting genes and FKBP3 was selected as the targeted gene by analyzing the diagnostic and prognostic values of Top10 intersecting genes. Moreover, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association between clinicopathological factors and survival rates. GO/KEGG and GSEA analysis was performed to explore the function of FKBP3 in LUAD progression. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was performed via STRING database and the top10 hub genes were selected. Finally, the relationship between FKBP3 and immune infiltration was explored by ssGSEA analysis. RESULTS: Firstly, 184 genes associated with the prognosis of LUAD and ferroptosis were obtained. FKBP3 was found to be significantly associated with a poor overall survival rate of LUAD patients. Immunohistochemical staining results showed that FKBP3 was highly located in cytoplasm and membrane of cells in LUAD tissues. PPI network analysis results showed that HDAC1, YY1, HDAC2, MTOR, PSMA3, PIN1, NCL, C14orf166, PIN4, and LARP6 were the top10 hub genes. Furthermore, spearman analysis results showed that the expression of FKBP3 was positively correlated with the abundance of Th2 cells and T helper cells. CONCLUSION: High level of FKBP3 was associated with poor prognostic outcomes of LUAD patients, which also inhibited immune infiltration in LUAD tissues. Additionally, FKBP3 was involved in regulating the ferroptosis process in LUAD patients. Thus, FKBP3 possessed the tumor promotion role might be involving in regulating ferroptosis and immune infiltration in LUAD progression.

A genomic instability-associated lncRNA signature for predicting prognosis and biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma.

Genomic instability (GI) was associated with tumorigenesis. However, GI-related lncRNA signature (GILncSig) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is still unknown. In this study, the lncRNA expression data, somatic mutation information and clinical survival information of LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and performed differential analysis. Functional and prognosis analysis revealed that multiple GI-related pathways were enriched. By using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, 5 GI-associated lncRNAs (AC012085.2, FAM83A-AS1, MIR223HG, MIR193BHG, LINC01116) were identified and used to construct a GILncSig model. Mutation burden analysis indicated that the high-risk GI group had much higher somatic mutation count and the risk score constructed by the 5 GI-associated lncRNAs was an independent predictor for overall survival (OS) (P < 0.05). Overall, our study provides valuable insights into the involvement of GI-associated lncRNAs in LUAD and highlights their potential as therapeutic targets.

Construction and validation of a prognostic signature based on anoikis-related lncRNAs in lung adenocarcinoma.

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common type of lung cancer and is characterized by a high death rate and a poor prospect for survival. Anoikis, which is a kind of programmed cell apoptosis, is an important factor in the advancement of tumors. Nonetheless, the function of anoikis-related lncRNAs (ARLRs) in LUAD is still not well understood. The TCGA database was queried for genomic and clinical information. A prognostic signature for ARLRs was established via the use of coexpression analysis and Cox regression. Validation of the model's accuracy was conducted utilizing K-M curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the signature was utilized to develop a nomogram. LncRNAs were implicated in the progression of tumors, as determined by functional enrichment analysis. There was an improvement in prognosis, increased immune cell infiltration, and higher immune scores among the low-risk patients. Additionally, we found that the two groups had varied anticancer drug sensitivities, which could help guide treatment. The impact of one ARLR, AC026355.2, on migration and invasion was validated by in vitro experiments in LUAD cells. Herein, a new lncRNA signature associated with anoikis was identified and estimated, potentially serving as a prognostic indicator for LUAD patients.

Disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs signature predicting prognosis and immunotherapy effect in lung adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a prevalent malignant tumor worldwide, with high incidence and mortality rates. However, there is still a lack of specific and sensitive biomarkers for its early diagnosis and targeted treatment. Disulfidptosis is a newly identified mode of cell death that is characteristic of disulfide stress. Therefore, exploring the correlation between disulfidptosis-related long non-coding RNAs (DRGs-lncRNAs) and patient prognosis can provide new molecular targets for LUAD patients. METHODS: The study analysed the transcriptome data and clinical data of LUAD patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, gene co-expression, and univariate Cox regression methods were used to screen for DRGs-lncRNAs related to prognosis. The risk score model of lncRNA was established by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. TIMER, CIBERSORT, CIBERSORT-ABS, and other methods were used to analyze immune infiltration and further evaluate immune function analysis, immune checkpoints, and drug sensitivity. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to detect the expression of DRGs-lncRNAs in LUAD cell lines. RESULTS: A total of 108 lncRNAs significantly associated with disulfidptosis were identified. A prognostic model was constructed by screening 10 lncRNAs with independent prognostic significance through single-factor Cox regression analysis, LASSO regression analysis, and multiple-factor Cox regression analysis. Survival analysis of patients through the prognostic model showed that there were obvious survival differences between the high- and low-risk groups. The risk score of the prognostic model can be used as an independent prognostic factor independent of other clinical traits, and the risk score increases with stage. Further analysis showed that the prognostic model was also different from tumor immune cell infiltration, immune function, and immune checkpoint genes in the high- and low-risk groups. Chemotherapy drug susceptibility analysis showed that high-risk patients were more sensitive to Paclitaxel, 5-Fluorouracil, Gefitinib, Docetaxel, Cytarabine, and Cisplatin. Additionally, RT-PCR analysis demonstrated differential expression of DRGs-lncRNAs between LUAD cell lines and the human bronchial epithelial cell line. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic model of DRGs-lncRNAs constructed in this study has certain accuracy and reliability in predicting the survival prognosis of LUAD patients, and provides clues for the interaction between disulfidptosis and LUAD immunotherapy.

Expression of Pluripotency Factors OCT4 and LIN28 Correlates with Survival Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Background and Objectives: Lung adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality despite recent therapeutic advances. Cancer stem cells have gained increasing attention due to their ability to induce cancer cell proliferation through self-renewal and differentiation into multiple cell lineages. OCT4 and LIN28 (and their homologs A and B) have been identified as key regulators of pluripotency in mammalian embryonic (ES) and induced stem (IS) cells, and they are the crucial regulators of cancer progression. However, their exact role in lung adenocarcinoma has not yet been clarified. Materials and Methods: The aim of this study was to explore the role of the pluripotency factors OCT4 and LIN28 in a cohort of surgically resected human lung adenocarcinomas to reveal possible biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis and potential therapeutic targets. The expressions of OCT4, LIN28A and LIN28B were analyzed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 96 patients with lung adenocarcinoma by immunohistochemistry. The results were analyzed with clinicopathologic parameters and were related to the prognosis of patients. Results: Higher OCT4 expression was related to an improved 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (p < 0.001). Nuclear LIN28B expression was lower in stage I and II tumors (p < 0.05) compared to advanced stage tumors. LIN28B cytoplasmic expression was associated with 5-year OS rates not only in univariate (p < 0.005), but also in multivariate analysis (where age, gender, histopathological subtype and stage were used as cofactors, p < 0.01 HR = 2.592). Patients with lower LIN28B expression showed improved 5-year OS rates compared to patients with increased LIN28B expression. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that OCT4 and LIN28B are implicated in lung adenocarcinoma progression and prognosis outcome; thus, they serve as promising prognostic biomarkers and putative therapeutic targets in lung adenocarcinomas.

Identifying and assessing a prognostic model based on disulfidptosis-related genes: implications for immune microenvironment and tumor biology in lung adenocarcinoma.

Introduction: Lung cancer, with the highest global mortality rate among cancers, presents a grim prognosis, often diagnosed at an advanced stage in nearly 70% of cases. Recent research has unveiled a novel mechanism of cell death termed disulfidptosis, which is facilitated by glucose scarcity and the protein SLC7A11. Methods: Utilizing the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis combined with Cox regression analysis, we constructed a prognostic model focusing on disulfidptosis-related genes. Nomograms, correlation analyses, and enrichment analyses were employed to assess the significance of this model. Among the genes incorporated into the model, CHRNA5 was selected for further investigation regarding its role in LUAD cells. Biological functions of CHRNA5 were assessed using EdU, transwell, and CCK-8 assays. Results: The efficacy of the model was validated through internal testing and an external validation set, with further evaluation of its robustness and clinical applicability using a nomogram. Subsequent correlation analyses revealed associations between the risk score and infiltration of various cancer types, as well as oncogene expression. Enrichment analysis also identified associations between the risk score and pivotal biological processes and KEGG pathways. Our findings underscore the significant impact of CHRNA5 on LUAD cell proliferation, migration, and disulfidptosis. Conclusion: This study successfully developed and validated a robust prognostic model centered on disulfidptosis-related genes, providing a foundation for predicting prognosis in LUAD patients.

CTR > 0.7 predicts the subgroup of lung adenocarcinomas ≤ 2 cm at risk of poor outcome treated by sublobar resection compared to lobar resection.

BACKGROUND: A standard surgical procedure for patients with small early-stage lung adenocarcinomas remains unknown. Hence, we aim in this study to assess the clinical utility of the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) when treating patients with small (2 cm) early stage lung cancers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 298 sublobar resection and 266 lobar resection recipients for early stage lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm was assembled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between 2016 and 2019. To compare survival rates among the different groups, Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated, and the log-rank test was used. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was constructed utilizing variables that were significant in univariate analysis of survival. RESULTS: In the study, 564 patients were included, with 298 patients (52.8%) undergoing sublobar resection and 266 patients (47.2%) undergoing lobar resection. Regarding survival results, there was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS, P = 0.674) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS, P = 0.253) between the two groups. Cox regression analyses showed that CTR ≥ 0.75(P < 0.001), age > 56 years (P = 0.007), and sublobar resection(P = 0.001) could predict worse survival. After examining survival results based on CTR categorization, we segmented the individuals into three categories: CTR<0.7, 0.7 ≤ CTR<1, and CTR = 1.The lobar resection groups had more favorable clinical outcomes than the sublobar resection groups in both the 0.7 ≤ CTR < 1(RFS: P < 0.001, OS: P = 0.001) and CTR = 1(RFS: P = 0.001, OS: P = 0.125). However, for patients with 0 ≤ CTR < 0.7, no difference in either RFS or OS was found between the lobar resection and sublobar resection groups, all of which had no positive events. Patients with a CTR between 0.7 and 1 who underwent lobar resection had similar 5-year RFS and OS rates compared to those with a CTR between 0 and 0.7 who underwent sublobar resection (100% vs. 100%). Nevertheless, a CTR of 1 following lobar resection resulted in notably reduced RFS and OS when compared to a CTR between 0.7 and 1 following lobar resection (P = 0.005 and P = 0.016, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lobar resection is associated with better long-term survival outcomes than sublobar resection for small lung adenocarcinomas ≤ 2 cm and CTR ≥ 0.7.

Identification of PSMD11 as a novel cuproptosis- and immune-related prognostic biomarker promoting lung adenocarcinoma progression.

BACKGROUND: Due to the unfavorable prognosis associated with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies is essential. Cuproptosis, an emerging form of regulated cell death, is implicated in mitochondrial metabolism and is induced by copper ions. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of cuproptosis- and immune-related genes (CIRGs) in LUAD. METHODS: We used The Cancer Genome Atlas database to develop a prognostic prediction model for LUAD patients based on eight CIRGs. Using Cox regression analysis, we determined that the CIRG signature is a reliable, independent prognostic factor. We further identified PSMD11 as a critical CIRG and performed immunohistochemistry to study the protein expression levels of PSMD11 in LUAD tissues. We also investigated the impact of PSMD11 on the biological behavior of lung cancer cell lines. RESULTS: We found that patients with low PSMD11 expression levels displayed an improved prognosis compared with those with high PSMD11 expression levels. Overexpression of PSMD11 enhanced proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumor growth of lung carcinoma cell line A549, while PSMD11 knockdown diminished proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumor growth of lung carcinoma cell line PC9. Additionally, we discovered that PSMD11 expression was positively correlated with the infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and the increased expression of immunosuppressive molecules. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that PSMD11 may serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for LUAD.

Developing a prognostic model using machine learning for disulfidptosis related lncRNA in lung adenocarcinoma.

Disulfidptosis represents a novel cell death mechanism triggered by disulfide stress, with potential implications for advancements in cancer treatments. Although emerging evidence highlights the critical regulatory roles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the pathobiology of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), research into lncRNAs specifically associated with disulfidptosis in LUAD, termed disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs (DRLs), remains insufficiently explored. Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD dataset, we implemented ten machine learning techniques, resulting in 101 distinct model configurations. To assess the predictive accuracy of our model, we employed both the concordance index (C-index) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. For a deeper understanding of the underlying biological pathways, we referred to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) for functional enrichment analysis. Moreover, we explored differences in the tumor microenvironment between high-risk and low-risk patient cohorts. Additionally, we thoroughly assessed the prognostic value of the DRLs signatures in predicting treatment outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis demonstrated a significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the high-risk and low-risk cohorts (p < 0.001). The prognostic model showed robust performance, with an area under the ROC curve exceeding 0.75 at one year and maintaining a value above 0.72 in the two and three-year follow-ups. Further research identified variations in tumor mutational burden (TMB) and differential responses to immunotherapies and chemotherapies. Our validation, using three GEO datasets (GSE31210, GSE30219, and GSE50081), revealed that the C-index exceeded 0.67 for GSE31210 and GSE30219. Significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were observed across all validation cohorts among different risk groups. The prognostic model offers potential as a molecular biomarker for LUAD prognosis.

Identification of subgroups and development of prognostic risk models along the glycolysis-cholesterol synthesis axis in lung adenocarcinoma.

Lung cancer is one of the most dangerous malignant tumors affecting human health. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common subtype of lung cancer. Both glycolytic and cholesterogenic pathways play critical roles in metabolic adaptation to cancer. A dataset of 585 LUAD samples was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. We obtained co-expressed glycolysis and cholesterogenesis genes by selecting and clustering genes from Molecular Signatures Database v7.5. We compared the prognosis of different subtypes and identified differentially expressed genes between subtypes. Predictive outcome events were modeled using machine learning, and the top 9 most important prognostic genes were selected by Shapley additive explanation analysis. A risk score model was built based on multivariate Cox analysis. LUAD patients were categorized into four metabolic subgroups: cholesterogenic, glycolytic, quiescent, and mixed. The worst prognosis was the mixed subtype. The prognostic model had great predictive performance in the test set. Patients with LUAD were effectively typed by glycolytic and cholesterogenic genes and were identified as having the worst prognosis in the glycolytic and cholesterogenic enriched gene groups. The prognostic model can provide an essential basis for clinicians to predict clinical outcomes for patients. The model was robust on the training and test datasets and had a great predictive performance.

A retrospective study of first-line therapy and subsequent pyrotinib treatment in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with HER2 mutations.

OBJECTIVES: HER2 is an infrequently mutated driver gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At present, there has been no comprehensive large-scale clinical study to establish the optimal first-line treatment strategy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with HER2-Mutant. Besides that, the effectiveness and safety of pyrotinib, a pan-HER inhibitor, in the context of NSCLC are still undergoing investigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we conducted a retrospective data collection of HER2-Mutated advanced LUAD who received first-line treatment and pyrotinib between May 2014 and June 2023. Patients treated with chemotherapy, chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chemotherapy + bevacizumab and pyrotinib in first-line treatment. Furthermore, we collected data on the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in these patients after disease progression. The main endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In the final analysis, 89 patients were included in the first-line cohort and 30 patients were included in the pyrotinib cohort. In the first-line treatment cohort, chemotherapy + ICIs, chemotherapy + bevacizumab, and pyrotinib exhibited notable survival benefits compared to chemotherapy (median PFS: 9.87 vs. 7.77 vs. 7.10 vs. 5.40 months, p-value < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with a first-line treatment PFS of less than 6 months may potentially benefit from subsequent treatment with pyrotinib (median PFS: 7.467 vs. 3.000, p-value = 0.0490). CONCLUSIONS: In the first-line treatment of HER2-Mutant LUAD, regimens involving combinations like chemotherapy + ICIs, chemotherapy + bevacizumab, and pyrotinib may confer enhanced survival advantages compared to chemotherapy. Nevertheless, no significant distinctions were observed among these three treatment strategies, underscoring the imperative to identify biomarkers for the discerning selection of suitable therapeutic modalities. Moreover, patients with suboptimal response to first-line treatment may potentially derive more benefit from pyrotinib.

CDCA gene family promotes progression and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The cell division cycle-associated (CDCA) family participates in the cell cycle, and the dysregulation of its expression is associated with the development of several types of cancers. However, the roles of CDCAs in lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) have not been investigated in systematic research. METHODS: Using data retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the expression of CDCAs in LUAD and normal tissues was compared, and survival analysis was performed using the data. Also, the correlation between clinical characteristics and the expression of CDCAs was assessed. Using data from cBioPortal, we investigated genetic alterations in CDCAs and their prognostic implications. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed to validate our findings from TCGA data. Following this, we created a risk score model to develop a nomogram. We also performed gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA), gene ontology, and KEGG pathway analysis. We used Timer to analyze the correlation between immune cell infiltration, tumor purity, and expression data. RESULTS: Our results indicated that all CDCAs were expressed at high levels in LUAD; this could be associated with poor overall survival, as indicated in TCGA data. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses revealed that CDCA4/5 could serve as independent risk factors. The results of immunohistochemical analyses confirmed our results. Based on the estimation of expression levels, clinical characteristics, alterations, and immune infiltration, the low-risk group of CDCA4/5 had a better prognosis than the high-risk group. Immune therapy is also a potential treatment option. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our findings indicate that CDCAs play important roles in LUAD, and CDCA4/5 can serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in LUAD.

Integrated bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing identifies an aneuploidy-based gene signature to predict sensitivity of lung adenocarcinoma to traditional chemotherapy drugs and patients' prognosis.

Background: Patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) often develop a poor prognosis. Currently, researches on prognostic and immunotherapeutic capacity of aneuploidy-related genes in LUAD are limited. Methods: Genes related to aneuploidy were screened based on bulk RNA sequencing data from public databases using Spearman method. Next, univariate Cox and Lasso regression analyses were performed to establish an aneuploidy-related riskscore (ARS) model. Results derived from bioinformatics analysis were further validated using cellular experiments. In addition, typical LUAD cells were identified by subtype clustering, followed by SCENIC and intercellular communication analyses. Finally, ESTIMATE, ssGSEA and CIBERSORT algorithms were employed to analyze the potential relationship between ARS and tumor immune environment. Results: A five-gene ARS signature was developed. These genes were abnormally high-expressed in LUAD cell lines, and in particular the high expression of CKS1B promoted the proliferative, migratory and invasive phenotypes of LUAD cell lines. Low ARS group had longer overall survival time, higher degrees of inflammatory infiltration, and could benefit more from receiving immunotherapy. Patients in low ASR group responded more actively to traditional chemotherapy drugs (Erlotinib and Roscovitine). The scRNA-seq analysis annotated 17 cell subpopulations into seven cell clusters. Core transcription factors (TFs) such as CREB3L1 and CEBPD were enriched in high ARS cell group, while TFs such as BCLAF1 and UQCRB were enriched in low ARS cell group. CellChat analysis revealed that high ARS cell groups communicated with immune cells via SPP1 (ITGA4-ITGB1) and MK (MDK-NCl) signaling pathways. Conclusion: In this research, integrative analysis based on the ARS model provided a potential direction for improving the diagnosis and treatment of LUAD.

Tumor inflammatory microenvironment contribution to survival in resected upstaged adenocarcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor Inflammatory microenvironment (TIME) encompasses several immune pathways modulating cancer development and escape that are not entirely uncoded. The results achieved with immunotherapy elicited the scientific debate on TIME also in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to investigate whether TIME (in terms of PD-L1 expression and/or Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes - TILs) played a separate role in terms of survival (OS) in resected upstaged lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs), excluding other perioperative variables as confounders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 patients with a clinically resectable lung ADC, undergoing surgery (lobectomy or segmentectomy) at the Thoracic Unit of Padova University Hospital between 2016 and 2022 and receiving an unexpected pathological upstaging (IIB or higher). RESULTS: Despite microscopical variables increasing from IIB to IIIB, survival was not significantly related to them. OS was better in TIME-active patients (defined as the presence of positive PD-L1 and/or TILs>10 %) than double negatives (PD-L1-/TILs-) (p = 0.01). In IIB or higher ADCs, TIME-active patients showed an improved survival compared to double negatives, merging the current TIME theories. CONCLUSION: TIME seems to be associated with survival independently from other microscopical parameter, even in case of resected upstaged adenocarcinomas.

Identification of a methyltransferase-related long noncoding RNA signature as a novel prognosis biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) accounts for a high proportion of tumor deaths globally, while methyltransferase-related lncRNAs in LUAD were poorly studied. METHODS: In our study, we focused on two distinct cohorts, TCGA-LUAD and GSE3021, to establish a signature of methyltransferase-related long non-coding RNAs (MeRlncRNAs) in LUAD. We employed univariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses as our main analytical tools. The GSE30219 cohort served as the validation cohort for our findings. Furthermore, to explore the differential pathway enrichments between groups stratified by risk, we utilized Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Additionally, single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) was conducted to assess the immune infiltration landscape within each sample. Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was also performed to verify the expression of prognostic lncRNAs in both clinically normal and LUAD samples. RESULTS: In LUAD, we identified a set of 32 MeRlncRNAs. We further narrowed our focus to six prognostic lncRNAs to develop gene signatures. The TCGA-LUAD cohort and GSE30219 were utilized to validate the risk score model derived from these signatures. Our analysis showed that the risk score served as an independent prognostic factor, linked to immune-related pathways. Additionally, the analysis of immune infiltration revealed that the immune landscape in high-risk groups was suppressed, which could contribute to poorer prognoses. We also constructed a regulatory network comprising 6 prognostic lncRNAs, 19 miRNAs, and 21 mRNAs. Confirmatory RT-qPCR results aligned with public database findings, verifying the expression of these prognostic lncRNAs in the samples. CONCLUSION: The prognostic gene signature of LUAD associated with MeRlncRNAs that we provided, may offer us a comprehensive picture of the prognosis prediction for LUAD patients.

Prognostic significance of SIRI in patients with late-stage lung adenocarcinoma receiving EGFR-TKI treatment.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined the relationship between the Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) and the overall prognosis of patients with late-stage lung adenocarcinoma who harbor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and are undergoing first-line treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). METHODS: A cohort comprising 52 patients with late-stage lung adenocarcinoma, who received treatment at Jinzhou Central Hospital between January 2018 and December 2022, were carefully selected. Patient data spanning from pre-treatment assessments through follow-up periods were meticulously collected from electronic medical records and subsequently subjected to a comprehensive retrospective analysis. The collected data was subjected to in-depth processing and analyzed using SPSS 27.0 statistical software. To determine the optimal cut-off value of the pre-treatment SIRI, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and both univariate and multivariate prognostic analyses were conducted using Cox regression. RESULTS: The optimal SIRI cut-off value was determined to be 1.659 (with a specificity of 0.964 and sensitivity of 0.652, P = 0.000). Based on this value, patients were categorized into high and low SIRI groups. Chi-squared tests demonstrated that SIRI exhibited statistically significant correlations with patient age and smoking history (P < 0.05). Survival analysis revealed that the group with a lower SIRI had a significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.001). Cox univariate analysis identified hypertension, pleural metastasis, liver metastasis, and SIRI as factors associated with PFS (P < 0.05). In the subsequent multivariate analysis, liver metastasis and SIRI ≥ 1.659 (P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for patients. CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment SIRI holds predictive significance for the prognosis of patients with late-stage lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations undergoing first-line treatment EGFR-TKI treatment.

Pseudosquamous Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study of 10 Cases.

Pseudosquamous adenocarcinoma of the lung is an unusual morphologic variant of poorly differentiated non-small cell lung carcinoma that superficially resembles a squamous cell carcinoma. We have examined 10 cases of these tumors in 4 women and 6 men, aged 47 to 93 years. The tumors were all peripheral and measured from 1.5 to 5.5 cm. All cases were characterized by solid nests of large polygonal tumor cells containing atypical nuclei with abundant cytoplasm and sharp cell borders, adopting a pavement-like architecture that simulated squamous cell carcinoma. Some cases demonstrated intracytoplasmic hyaline inclusions suggestive of keratinization. The nests of tumor cells often showed central comedo-like areas of necrosis. Intercellular bridges were not seen in any of the cases. The tumors often displayed marked clearing of the cytoplasm enhancing their epidermoid appearance. In 4 cases, the solid pseudosquamous areas were seen to merge with a focal lepidic adenocarcinoma component, and in 1 case, abortive microscopic foci of acinar differentiation were also noted within the tumor. One case showed focal sarcomatoid spindle cell areas. The tumor cells were negative for p40 and CK5/6 and labeled with TTF1 or Napsin-A, confirming an adenocarcinoma phenotype. Clinical follow-up information was available in 8 patients; 6 patients died of their tumors between 6 months to 11 years after diagnosis (mean: 3.1 y). One patient died of complications related to surgery and one patient with a low-stage tumor died at 27 years from other causes. Solid pattern adenocarcinomas can be confused for squamous cell carcinoma and may require immunohistochemistry to determine their true phenotype.

Clinicopathological differences between EGFR mutated and EGFR wild-type lung adenocarcinoma with papillary predominant pattern.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to reveal the clinicopathological differences between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated and wild-type (WT) lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) focusing on the predominant subtype. METHODS: This study included 352 with EGFR mutation and 370 with WT patients in consecutive stage I LUAD classified by the predominant subtype, and their clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were analyzed. Using the Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) cohort, we analyzed differences in gene expression between EGFR mutation and WT groups. Furthermore, we performed immunohistochemical evaluations for 46 with EGFR mutation and 47 with WT patients in consecutive stage I papillary predominant adenocarcinoma (PPA). RESULTS: Compared to the PPA with WT [n = 115], those with EGFR mutation [n = 99] exhibited smaller invasive size (p = 0.03) and less frequent vessel invasion (p < 0.01). However, PPA with EGFR mutation showed significantly worse 5-ys recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates compared to those with WT (70.6 % versus 83.3 %, p = 0.03). Contrarily, no significant differences were observed in other predominant subtypes. In the TCGA cohort, PPA with EGFR mutation tended to show higher expression of galectin-3, which is associated with tumor metastasis and resistance to anoikis, compared to those with WT (p = 0.06). Immunohistochemical evaluation revealed that galectin-3 expression was significantly higher in PPA with EGFR mutation than in those with WT (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of PPA with EGFR mutation proved to be less favorable compared to that with WT, and galectin-3 is highly expressed in EGFR-mutated PPA.