Analysis of risk indicators for implant failure in patients with chronic periodontitis.

Dental implant restoration shows an effective method for the rehabilitation of missing teeth. The failure rate of periodontal implants in patients with chronic periodontitis is associated with periodontal flora, inflammation, and long-term periodontal bone resorption caused by chronic periodontitis. However, the therapeutic effects of dental implant restoration on inflammation in patients with chronic periodontitis have not addressed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the risk indicators for inflammation, bone loss and implant failure in patients with chronic periodontitis. A total of 284 patients with dental implant restoration were recruited and divided into periodontally healthy patients (n = 128) and chronic periodontitis patients (n = 156). Periodontal indices including probing depth (PD), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), plaque index (PLI), gingival bleeding (GIL) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were compared in two groups. Inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 (IL-1), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels at baseline, 6 and 12 months after surgery, and the implant survival rate at 12 months after surgery, as well as the risk factors associated with failure of dental implant were also assessed. Outcomes demonstrated that patients in the chronic periodontitis group had higher values of periodontal indices than those in the periodontally healthy group. All inflammatory parameters in the chronic periodontitis group were higher than those in the periodontally healthy group and negatively associated with the chronic periodontal index (CPI) in chronic periodontitis patients. Chronic periodontitis patients had higher the prevalence of mucositis and peri-implantitis than patients with healthy periodontium. Implant diameter, length and design was associated with the risk of implant failure for chronic periodontitis patients receiving dental implant. The cumulative implant failure rate and incidence of implant fractures for chronic periodontitis patients at 12 months after surgery were 12.10% and 7.23% (p < 0.05), respectively, while were lower in the heathy periodontitis patients. Location, diameter, implant design, immediate loading and bone defect were risk indicators for bone loss for dental implant patients. The risk factors associated with failure of dental implant was higher in chronic periodontitis patients than patients in the periodontally healthy group (14.25% vs. 4.92%, p < 0.05). In conclusion, data in the current study indicate that inflammation is a risk indicator bone loss, implant fracture and implant failure in patients with chronic periodontitis.

GPR40/GPR120 Agonist GW9508 Improves Metabolic Syndrome-Exacerbated Periodontitis in Mice.

G protein-coupled receptor (GPR)40 and GPR120 are receptors for medium- and long-chain free fatty acids. It has been well documented that GPR40 and GPR120 activation improves metabolic syndrome (MetS) and exerts anti-inflammatory effects. Since chronic periodontitis is a common oral inflammatory disease initiated by periodontal pathogens and exacerbated by MetS, we determined if GPR40 and GPR120 activation with agonists improves MetS-associated periodontitis in animal models in this study. We induced MetS and periodontitis by high-fat diet feeding and periodontal injection of lipopolysaccharide, respectively, and treated mice with GW9508, a synthetic GPR40 and GPR120 dual agonist. We determined alveolar bone loss, osteoclast formation, and periodontal inflammation using micro-computed tomography, osteoclast staining, and histology. To understand the underlying mechanisms, we further performed studies to determine the effects of GW9508 on osteoclastogenesis and proinflammatory gene expression in vitro. Results showed that GW9508 improved metabolic parameters, including glucose, lipids, and insulin resistance. Results also showed that GW9508 improves periodontitis by reducing alveolar bone loss, osteoclastogenesis, and periodontal inflammation. Finally, in vitro studies showed that GW9508 inhibited osteoclast formation and proinflammatory gene secretion from macrophages. In conclusion, this study demonstrated for the first time that GPR40/GPR120 agonist GW9508 reduced alveolar bone loss and alleviated periodontal inflammation in mice with MetS-exacerbated periodontitis, suggesting that activating GPR40/GPR120 with agonist GW9508 is a potential anti-inflammatory approach for the treatment of MetS-associated periodontitis.

An eight-year retrospective study on the clinical outcomes of laser surface-treated implants.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate peri-implant bone loss and health status associated with the long-term use of laser surface-treated implants. METHODS: For control study, total of 23 titanium ASTM F136 grade 23 implants were placed in the edentulous molar area of the mandible. When the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) ≥ 70 and insertion torque value (ITV) ≥ 35-50 Ncm at the insertion site, an immediate provisional restoration was connected to the implant within a week after surgery. The definitive restorations were placed 2 months after surgery for all implants. 13 implants were immediately loaded, while 10 implants were conventionally loaded. For comparative study, Radiographs were taken from third years for and then annually for the subsequent eight years to monitor marginal bone loss. RESULTS: After eight year of implant installation, the average change in vertical bone loss was 0.009 mm (P < 0.001), while the average change in horizontal bone loss 8 year after implant placement was 0.026 mm (P < 0.001). The mean marginal bone loss was < 0.2 mm on average. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, laser-treated implants exhibit a low rate of bone absorption around the implants.

Induced Periodontitis in Rats With Three Ligature Types: An Exploratory Study.

BACKGROUND: The placement of ligatures in the cervical area of rat molars is considered as a predictable model to induce periodontitis. OBJECTIVES: The present explorative study aimed to compare the efficacy of metal wires (MWs), without or with sandblasting, versus silk ligatures (SLs) in inducing periodontal bone loss in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups of eight rats that received three different types of ligatures (MW, sandblasted wire [SMW], and SL) around their first right mandibular molar, while the contralateral tooth was left without the ligature and served as a control. Bone loss was assessed by measuring the distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the bone crest at the distal aspect of the first molar on central mesiodistal sections generated from micro-CT scans taken 24 and 35 days after ligature placement. RESULTS: In the SL group, only in two rats the ligatures were retained until the end of the 24-day period; in all other animals, the ligatures were lost at some time point. In the SMW, the ligatures were retained only for the 24-day period. In the MW group, no ligatures were lost. Irrespective of the group or experimental period, the difference in the crestal bone level between ligated and control teeth was in most cases z < 0.20 mm, that is, in 19 out of 25 pairs of teeth. In a few cases, the bone crest was more apically located at the control teeth compared to the ligated ones (four cases each, during both 24- and 35-day experimental periods). CONCLUSIONS: Bone loss was minimal during the experimental period, with no significant differences between the test and control teeth, or among the three types of ligatures. MWs, not even roughened, do not seem to be a better alternative to SLs for inducing bone loss in the experimental periodontitis model in the rat. This assumption, however, has to be confirmed in a larger, well-powered study.

Early orthodontic treatment after periodontal surgery: a randomized controlled trial / Le traitement orthodontique précoce après la chirurgie parodontale : essai clinique randomisé et contrôlé.

Introduction: The pathological teeth migrations require correct multidisciplinary treatment which consists of periodontal surgery associated with early or late orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to know which of the two orthodontic treatments would have a better periodontal response. Material and Method: Two parameters, radiological (the height of the alveolar bone) and clinical (the depth of the periodontal pocket), were used to meet the objective of this work. Eighteen patients received early orthodontic treatment (straight wire appliance) after periodontal flap debridement surgery and eighteen others late orthodontic treatment (straight wire appliance). Results: The results showed the absence of significant difference between the two early and late orthodontic treatments after periodontal flap debridement surgery. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment can be started early seven to ten days after periodontal surgery.

Introduction: Les migrations dentaires pathologiques exigent un traitement pluridisciplinaire correct qui consiste en une chirurgie parodontale associée à un traitement orthodontique précoce ou tardif. Le but de cette étude était de connaître lequel des deux traitements orthodontiques aurait une meilleure réponse parodontale. Matériel et méthode: Deux paramètres, radiologique (la hauteur du défaut osseux) et clinique (la profondeur de la poche parodontale), ont été utilisés afin de répondre à l'objectif de ce travail. Dix-huit patients ont reçu, après la chirurgie parodontale par un lambeau d'assainissement, un traitement orthodontique précoce (technique d'arc droit) et dix-huit autres un traitement orthodontique tardif (technique d'arc droit). Résultats: Les résultats ont montré l'absence de différence significative entre les deux traitements orthodontiques, précoce et tardif, après la chirurgie parodontale par un lambeau d'assainissement. Conclusion: Le traitement orthodontique peut débuter précocement dès sept à dix jours après la chirurgie parodontale.

Experimental Inoculation of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Streptococcus gordonii and Its Impact on Alveolar Bone Loss and Oral and Gut Microbiomes.

Oral bacteria are implicated not only in oral diseases but also in gut dysbiosis and inflammatory conditions throughout the body. The periodontal pathogen Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa) often occurs in complex oral biofilms with Streptococcus gordonii (Sg), and this interaction might influence the pathogenic potential of this pathogen. This study aims to assess the impact of oral inoculation with Aa, Sg, and their association (Aa+Sg) on alveolar bone loss, oral microbiome, and their potential effects on intestinal health in a murine model. Sg and/or Aa were orally administered to C57Bl/6 mice, three times per week, for 4 weeks. Aa was also injected into the gingiva three times during the initial experimental week. After 30 days, alveolar bone loss, expression of genes related to inflammation and mucosal permeability in the intestine, serum LPS levels, and the composition of oral and intestinal microbiomes were determined. Alveolar bone resorption was detected in Aa, Sg, and Aa+Sg groups, although Aa bone levels did not differ from that of the SHAM-inoculated group. Il-1ß expression was upregulated in the Aa group relative to the other infected groups, while Il-6 expression was downregulated in infected groups. Aa or Sg downregulated the expression of tight junction genes Cldn 1, Cldn 2, Ocdn, and Zo-1 whereas infection with Aa+Sg led to their upregulation, except for Cldn 1. Aa was detected in the oral biofilm of the Aa+Sg group but not in the gut. Infections altered oral and gut microbiomes. The oral biofilm of the Aa group showed increased abundance of Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacterales, and Alloprevotella, while Sg administration enhanced the abundance of Alloprevotella and Rothia. The gut microbiome of infected groups showed reduced abundance of Erysipelotrichaceae. Infection with Aa or Sg disrupts both oral and gut microbiomes, impacting oral and gut homeostasis. While the combination of Aa with Sg promotes Aa survival in the oral cavity, it mitigates the adverse effects of Aa in the gut, suggesting a beneficial role of Sg associations in gut health.

Sclerostin antibody corrects periodontal disease in type 2 diabetic mice.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is on the rise worldwide and is associated with various complications in the oral cavity. Using an adult-onset diabetes preclinical model, we demonstrated profound periodontal alterations in T2D mice, including inflamed gingiva, disintegrated periodontal ligaments (PDLs), marked alveolar bone loss, and unbalanced bone remodeling due to decreased formation and increased resorption. Notably, we observed elevated levels of the Wnt signaling inhibitor sclerostin in the alveolar bone of T2D mice. Motivated by these findings, we investigated whether a sclerostin-neutralizing antibody (Scl-Ab) could rescue the compromised periodontium in T2D mice. Administering Scl-Ab subcutaneously once a week for 4 weeks, starting 4 weeks after T2D induction, led to substantial increases in bone mass. This effect was attributed to the inhibition of osteoclasts and promotion of osteoblasts in both control and T2D mice, effectively reversing the bone loss caused by T2D. Furthermore, Scl-Ab stimulated PDL cell proliferation, partially restored the PDL fibers, and mitigated inflammation in the periodontium. Our study thus established a T2D-induced periodontitis mouse model characterized by inflammation and tissue degeneration. Scl-Ab emerged as a promising intervention to counteract the detrimental effects of T2D on the periodontium, exhibiting limited side effects on other craniofacial hard tissues.

Effect of vertical implant position on marginal bone loss: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: One of the most important factors that has influence on dental implants success rate is marginal bone loss. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the implant's vertical position and the soft tissue's thickness on the rate of marginal bone loss of the dental implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial study, 56 implants placed in the posterior region of mandible of 33 patients (19 women, 14 men) were divided into two groups. The group of crestal (28 implants) and subcrestal (28 implants) implants, each group was divided into two sub-groups with soft tissue thickness of 2 mm and less than 2 mm (14 implants) and more than 2 mm (14 implants). The amount of marginal bone loss was measured by Scanora 5.2 program with radiographs Digital parallelism based on the effect of the vertical position of the implant, soft tissue thickness, three months after placement, and three months after loading implants (six months after implant placement). RESULTS: The results showed that marginal bone loss in subcrestal implants is significantly more than crestal implants (p-value = 0.001), and also marginal bone loss in the soft tissue thickness group of 2 mm and less is significantly more than the group of soft tissue thickness more than 2 mm (p-value < 0.001). The amount of marginal bone loss three months after implant loading was significantly higher than three months after implant placement (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The implant's vertical position and the soft tissue's thickness around the implant are effective factors in the amount of marginal bone loss. Marginal bone loss is more in subcrestal implants and in cases with less soft tissue thickness. The time factor significantly affects the amount of marginal bone loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: this clinical trial was registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, registration number IRCT20120215009014N415, registration date 20,220,110, (https//en.irct.ir/trial/60,991).

An update on periodontal inflammation and bone loss.

Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects the supporting structures of the teeth, including the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. Periodontal disease is due to an immune response that stimulates gingivitis and periodontitis, and its systemic consequences. This immune response is triggered by bacteria and may be modulated by environmental conditions such as smoking or systemic disease. Recent advances in single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) and in vivo animal studies have provided new insight into the immune response triggered by bacteria that causes periodontitis and gingivitis. Dysbiosis, which constitutes a change in the bacterial composition of the microbiome, is a key factor in the initiation and progression of periodontitis. The host immune response to dysbiosis involves the activation of various cell types, including keratinocytes, stromal cells, neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells and several lymphocyte subsets, which release pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Periodontal disease has been implicated in contributing to the pathogenesis of several systemic conditions, including diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer's disease. Understanding the complex interplay between the oral microbiome and the host immune response is critical for the development of new therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of periodontitis and its systemic consequences.

Streptococcus gordonii Supragingival Bacterium Oral Infection-Induced Periodontitis and Robust miRNA Expression Kinetics.

Streptococcus gordonii (S. gordonii, Sg) is one of the early colonizing, supragingival commensal bacterium normally associated with oral health in human dental plaque. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in the inflammation-mediated pathways and are involved in periodontal disease (PD) pathogenesis. PD is a polymicrobial dysbiotic immune-inflammatory disease initiated by microbes in the gingival sulcus/pockets. The objective of this study is to determine the global miRNA expression kinetics in S. gordonii DL1-infected C57BL/6J mice. All mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10 mice/group; 5 males and 5 females). Bacterial infection was performed in mice at 8 weeks and 16 weeks, mice were euthanized, and tissues harvested for analysis. We analyzed differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs in the mandibles of S. gordonii-infected mice. Gingival colonization/infection by S. gordonii and alveolar bone resorption (ABR) was confirmed. All the S. gordonii-infected mice at two specific time points showed bacterial colonization (100%) in the gingival surface, and a significant increase in mandible and maxilla ABR (p < 0.0001). miRNA profiling revealed 191 upregulated miRNAs (miR-375, miR-34b-5p) and 22 downregulated miRNAs (miR-133, miR-1224) in the mandibles of S. gordonii-infected mice at the 8-week mark. Conversely, at 16 weeks post-infection, 10 miRNAs (miR-1902, miR-203) were upregulated and 32 miRNAs (miR-1937c, miR-720) were downregulated. Two miRNAs, miR-210 and miR-423-5p, were commonly upregulated, and miR-2135 and miR-145 were commonly downregulated in both 8- and 16-week-infected mice mandibles. Furthermore, we employed five machine learning (ML) algorithms to assess how the number of miRNA copies correlates with S. gordonii infections in mice. In the ML analyses, miR-22 and miR-30c (8-week), miR-720 and miR-339-5p (16-week), and miR-720, miR-22, and miR-339-5p (combined 8- and 16-week) emerged as the most influential miRNAs.

Effect of Cantilever Extension on Bone Loss in Mandibular Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses with Three and Four Implants.

PURPOSE: To compare the peri-implant bone loss of mandibular complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses (FPSs) supported by three and four implants and to correlate with the size of the horizontal and vertical distal cantilever at prosthesis placement (T1) and after 1 year (T2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 72 external hexagon (EH) type implants were placed in 20 participants. Of these, 24 supported an FPS with three implants (G3I) and 48 with four implants (G4I). The mandibular implants were named 1, 2, 3, and 4 according to their location in the arch, in a clockwise direction. Digital periapical radiographs were taken at times T1 and T2 for analysis and measurement of peri-implant bone loss. The horizontal and vertical distal cantilevers were measured with a digital caliper and correlated with peri-implant bone loss. RESULTS: The survival rate of implants in G3I was 91.66%, and in G4I it was 97.91%. The mean bone loss in G3I was 0.88 ± 0.89 mm, and in G4I it was 0.58 ± 0.78 mm (P = .225). There was no correlation between distal horizontal cantilevers and bone loss in the studied groups, with G3I being -0.25 (P = .197) and G4I -0.22 (P = .129). Larger vertical cantilevers of implants 1 (P = .018), 3 (P =.015), and 4 (P = .045) correlated with greater bone loss in G4I. CONCLUSIONS: The number of implants in an FPS did not influence peri-implant bone loss after 1 year of follow-up. Larger vertical cantilevers influenced greater bone loss in complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses supported by four implants.

Progressive bone loss and bleeding on probing: A cohort study.

AIM: To investigate whether a progressive marginal bone loss (PMBL) occurring beyond the initial bone remodeling (IBR) is linked with bleeding on probing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 70 partially edentulous patients exhibiting 112 two-piece bone-level implants were included in this retrospective study. Panoramic radiographs were obtained after implant insertion (T0), after delivery of a final prosthetic restoration (T1) and subsequently during the 1-(T2), 5-(T3), 10-(T4), and 15-years (T5) follow-up visits. At each time point, radiographic marginal bone levels were assessed from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact at mesial and distal aspects. The IBR was defined as a bone loss occurring up to prosthesis delivery, that is, from T0 to T1. The PMBL was defined as bone loss occurring after T1. At T2, T3, T4, and T5, the presence or absence of bleeding on probing (BOP) was recorded at four sites. A median regression with mixed models was performed to assess the difference of PMBL in PMBL + BOP+ and PBML + BOP- groups. RESULTS: Over the mean implant functioning time of 4.44 ± 4.91 years, 38 (34%) implants showed no PBML, whereas 74 (66%) implants featured PMBL. Of these, 35 (47%) and 39 (53%) implants were assigned to the PMBL + BOP- and PMBL + BOP+ groups, respectively. The mean PMBL after 1, 5, 10, and 15 years were comparable between implants featuring PMBL with or without BOP. At 1 year, BOP intensity significantly correlated PMBL, with each increase in one BOP-positive site being associated with increase in PMBL by 0.55 mm (p = 0.038), whereas this association was not found at 5, 10, and 15 years. The IBR values in the no PBML, PMBL + BOP+, and PBML + BOP- groups were -0.24 ± 0.31, -0.41 ± 0.59, and -0.24 ± 0.33 mm, respectively, with no significant differences found among the groups. CONCLUSION: Progressive bone loss at implant sites is not always linked with bleeding on probing.

Periodontal status and mandibular biomechanics in rats subjected to hyposalivation and periodontitis.

Xerostomia emerges as a consequence of salivary gland hypofunction, and seriously compromises the integrity of hard and soft oral tissues, whileperiodontitis is an infectious disease characterized by biofilm accumulation, inflammation and alveolar bone resorption. AIM: The aim this study was to compare the deleterious effects caused by experimental hyposalivation, periodontitis, and the combination of both on periodontal tissues and mandibular biomechanics in rats. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Hyposalivation (group H) was induced through bilateral submandibulectomy. Periodontitis (group EP) was induced by injecting LPS (1 mg/ml) into the gingiva of the first lower molars. A third group was subjected to both conditions (group H+EP). Alveolar bone loss was evaluated by micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis, and gingival inflammatory mediators were assessed by specific techniques. Biomechanical properties were evaluated in mandible. RESULTS: Alveolar bone loss increased similarly in groups H, EP and H+EP compared to control. Metalloproteinase (MMP2 and MMP9) activity was similar in H and control, but higher in groups EP and H+EP (MMP2: C 9644+2214, EP 34441+3336, H 5818+1532, H+EP 42673+3184; MMP9: C 5792+961, EP 14807+861, H 9295+520, H+EP 4838+1531). The rest of the inflammatory mediators evaluated increased in groups H, EP and H+EP to a greater or lesser extent with respect to the control, although in most cases, they were higher in groups EP and H+EP than in group H. The biomechanical properties of the mandible increased in group H compared to the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both hyposalivation and periodontitis cause periodontal damage, but hyposalivation also produces biomechanical alterations, causing more extensive deleterious effects than periodontitis.

La xerostomía surge como consecuencia de la hipofunción de las glándulas salivales y compromete seriamente la integridad de los tejidos orales duros y blandos, mientras que la periodontitis es una enfermedad infecciosa caracterizada por la acumulación de biofilm, inflamación y reabsorción ósea alveolar. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar los efectos deletéreos causados por la hiposalivación y la periodontitis experimental, y la combinación de ambas sobre los tejidos periodontales y la biomecánica mandibular en ratas. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: La hiposalivación (H) se indujo mediante una submandibulectomía bilateral. Por otra parte, la periodontitis (PE) se indujo mediante la inyección de LPS (1 mg/ml) en la encía de los primeros molares inferiores. Otro grupo se sometió a ambas condiciones (H+PE). La pérdida ósea alveolar se evaluó mediante tomografia microcomputarizada y análisis histomorfométrico, mientras que los mediadores inflamatorios gingivales fueron determinados mediante técnicas específicas. Se evaluaron las propiedades biomecánicas en la mandíbula. RESULTADOS: La hiposalivación aumentó la pérdida ósea alveolar en comparación con el control de forma similar a la PE y H+PE. La actividad de las metaloproteinasas (MMP2 y MMP9) fue similar en los grupos H y control, pero resultó mayor en los grupos PE y H+PE (MMP2: C 9644+2214, PE 34441+3336, H 5818+1532, H+PE 42673+3184; MMP9: C 5792+961, PE 14807+861, H 9295+520, H+PE 24838+1531). El resto de los mediadores inflamatorios evaluados aumentaron en mayor o menor medida en los grupos H, PE y H+PE respecto al control, aunque en la mayoría de los casos fueron superiores en los grupos PE y H+PE respecto al grupo H. Sin embargo, las propiedades biomecánicas de la mandíbula aumentaron en el grupo H con respecto a los otros grupos. CONCLUSIONES: Tanto la hiposalivación como la periodontitis causan daño periodontal, pero la hiposalivación también produce alteraciones biomecánicas, provocando efectos deletéreos más extensos que la periodontitis.

Engineering a targeted and safe bone anabolic gene therapy to treat osteoporosis in alveolar bone loss.

Alveolar bone loss in elderly populations is highly prevalent and increases the risk of tooth loss, gum disease susceptibility, and facial deformity. Unfortunately, there are very limited treatment options available. Here, we developed a bone-targeted gene therapy that reverses alveolar bone loss in patients with osteoporosis by targeting the adaptor protein Schnurri-3 (SHN3). SHN3 is a promising therapeutic target for alveolar bone regeneration, because SHN3 expression is elevated in the mandible tissues of humans and mice with osteoporosis while deletion of SHN3 in mice greatly increases alveolar bone and tooth dentin mass. We used a bone-targeted recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) carrying an artificial microRNA (miRNA) that silences SHN3 expression to restore alveolar bone loss in mouse models of both postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis by enhancing WNT signaling and osteoblast function. In addition, rAAV-mediated silencing of SHN3 enhanced bone formation and collagen production of human skeletal organoids in xenograft mice. Finally, rAAV expression in the mandible was tightly controlled via liver- and heart-specific miRNA-mediated repression or via a vibration-inducible mechanism. Collectively, our results demonstrate that AAV-based bone anabolic gene therapy is a promising strategy to treat alveolar bone loss in osteoporosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence versus manual detection in marginal bone loss around fixed prosthesis. a systematic review.

Objectives: The aim of the review is to evaluate the existing precision of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) around prosthetic crowns using 2-Dimentional radiographs. It also summarises the recent advances and future challenges associated to their clinical application. Methodology: A literature survey of electronic databases was conducted in November 2023 to recognize the relevant articles. MeSH terms/keywords were used to search ("panoramic" OR "pantomogram" OR "orthopantomogram" OR "opg" OR "periapical") AND ("artificial intelligence" OR "deep" OR "machine" OR "automated" OR "learning") AND ("periodontal bone loss") AND ("prosthetic crown") in PubMed database, SCOPUS, COCHRANE library, EMBASE, CINAHL and Science Direct. RESULTS: The searches identified 49 relevant articles, of them 5 articles met the inclusion criteria were included. The outcomes measured were sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of AI models versus manual detection in panoramic and intraoral radiographs. Few studies reported no significant difference between AI and manual detection, whereas majority demonstrated the superior ability of AI in detecting MBL. CONCLUSIONS: AI models show promising accuracy in analysing complex datasets and generate accurate predictions in the MBL around fixed prosthesis. However, these models are still in the developmental phase. Therefore, it is crucial to assess the effectiveness and reliability of these models before recommending their use in clinical practice.

ISQ as a Diagnostic Tool in Implants Affected with Bone Loss: An In Vitro Experimental Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between bone loss that occurs during the peri-implantitis process and variations in implant stability using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurement methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty selftapping implants were placed in cow ribs, and study scenarios were established according to the affected implant side and bone loss depth (n = 10 implants per group): Case 1 = bone loss on one side (vestibular); Case 2 = bone loss on two opposite sides (buccal and lingual); Case 3 = bone loss on two adjacent sides (buccal and mesial); and Case 4 = foursided bone loss (circumferential). For each group of 10 implants, first a bone loss of 0 mm was evaluated, then 4-mm defects (simulating 1/3 of bone loss) were created and evaluated, and finally 8-mm defects (simulating 2/3 of bone loss) were created and evaluated. Osteotomy measurements were made with a periodontal probe. For each implant, RFA was measured by the same operator using the Beacon system (Osstell). RESULTS: The initial implant stability quotient (ISQ) values of the 40 implants exceeded 70, reflecting an average of 73 in the buccolingual (VL) and 74.8 in the mesiodistal (MD) directions. ISQ measurements in the 10 implants in which bone dehiscence was performed on the vestibular aspect reflected a decrease in ISQ values as bone loss increased. When generating bone loss in two opposite sides (buccal and lingual), a greater decrease in ISQ values was observed when 2/3 of the implant were affected. The average VL ISQ measurement was less than 70 when at sites with 2/3 of bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: When bone loss occurs on only one side of the implant, the ISQ values decrease, but the implant maintains good stability. The same occurs when two opposite sides of the implant are affected, as the unaffected side has the least decrease in ISQ value.

Tissue changes around dental implants installed in alveolar ridge preservation sites: A 1-year follow-up randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess radiographic marginal bone changes 22 months post extraction, which is 1 year after implant loading in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) sites grafted with a combination of collagen-embedded xenogenic bone substitute (DBBM-C) and collagen matrix (CMX), comparing them with implants placed in naturally healed sites. METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted over 22 months. Patients who needed a single tooth extraction and subsequent implant placement in nonmolar areas were enrolled. The test group received deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen covered by a procaine collagen membrane, while the control group allowed spontaneous healing. Radiographic bone level changes were documented using periapical radiographs at implant placement and follow-up visits (6, 10, and 22 months postextraction). Early implant soft tissue exposure, clinical parameters, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-two out of 28 participants completed a 22-month follow-up, 9 in the test group and 13 in the control group. At 10-month postextraction follow-up, the mean MBL was 1.01 ± 1.04 mm in the treatment group and 0.81 ± 0.93 mm in the control group (p = 0.804). At 22 months, the mean MBL was 2.09 ± 1.03 mm in the treatment group and 1.58 ± 0.73 mm in the control group (p = 0.339). No statistically significant differences in probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were found at the 22 -month follow-up as well. Soft tissue mean recession was observed in the control group (0.36 ± 0.84 mm), while no recession was found in the test group (p = 0.2). Early implant soft tissue exposure occurred in 33% of test group participants, while none was observed in the control group (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: One year after implant loading, no significant differences in marginal bone resorption were found between implants placed in ARP-treated and naturally healed sites. However, ARP-treated sites exhibited early implant soft-tissue exposure, suggesting a possible impairment in soft tissue healing.

Prospective observational cohort study of the change of the marginal bone crest in relation to the prosthetic abutment height and the peri-implant vertical mucosal thickness at implants positioned subcrestally.

AIM: To evaluate the influence on peri-implant crestal bone loss exerted by the vertical mucosal thickness and the abutment height over 12 months after placement of the restoration on subcrestal implants with change of platform, using a restoration abutment platform smaller than the implant platform. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 99 implants were rehabilitated in the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions. A total of 22 implants were rehabilitated in the maxilla and 77 implants in the mandible, using digitally designed customized abutments with Atlantis weborder software, from the commercial house Dentsply Sirona (Dentsply Sirona S.A., Barcelona, Spain), version 4.6.5, adapting the height to the vertical thickness of the mucosa. Clinical and radiographic monitoring begins during the surgical procedure of placement of the implant and ends 12 months afterwards. Crestal bone loss was evaluated through the Carestream® CS8100 3D radiographic equipment. RESULTS: In all cases, the greatest loss of marginal bone occurred between the day of surgery (Tx) and placement of the rehabilitation (To). The average bone loss between both times was greater when the abutment height and vertical mucosal thickness did not exceed 3 mm. Subsequently, bone loss slowed and stabilized at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The minimum abutment height and the vertical mucosal thickness are factors to take into account when minimizing peri-implant marginal bone loss, the abutment height having the greatest importance according to the clinical data obtained.

Comparison of the success rate and marginal bone loss of implants placed simultaneously with either bone expansion or ridge splitting in maxillary sites: a prospective non-randomized study.

This study was performed to compare the amount of marginal bone loss (MBL) and the success rate of implants placed following maxillary ridge expansion with two surgical techniques. A non-randomized prospective study was designed. The patients underwent either bone expansion or ridge splitting, and simultaneous implant placement. The implants were loaded according to the delayed loading protocol with single crowns. Each study group included 35 implants placed in 31 patients. One year after loading, the implant success rate was 100 % in both groups. The median MBL was 1.00 mm in both groups (interquartile range 0.10 mm in the bone expansion group and 0.30 mm in the ridge splitting group) (no significant difference, P = 0.749). The median MBL around implants placed in sites with D2, D3, and D4 density bone was 1.40 mm, 1.00 mm, and 0.80 mm in the expansion group and 1.50 mm, 1.00 mm, and 0.85 mm in the splitting group, respectively. There was a significant difference in MBL between the different bone density types within both groups (P < 0.001). In conclusion, no significant difference in the amount of MBL or the success rate was observed between implants placed simultaneously with ridge splitting and those placed simultaneously with bone expansion, in the maxilla.