ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: On October 7, 2023, operation "Iron Swords" erupted following a barbaric terror attack, resulting in over 1,200 casualties, with more than 250 individuals, abducted. The aftermath of this slaughter led to the evacuation of hundreds of thousands from their homes in both the south and north of Israel. This situation triggered an unprecedented surge in the request for mental health support as reported by health funds and helplines. Global observations of large-scale traumatic events indicate increased usage of mental health services. The question then arises regarding the scope of services required in response to the mega-atrocity of October 7. OBJECTIVES: To chart the utilization of psychiatric clinical treatment services in Israel in the aftermath of the October 7 attack. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis using the electronic database from the research division of Clalit Health Services. We performed a comparative charting of mental health clinic treatments among individuals aged 15 and above, focusing on October-December 2023. These data were then compared to corresponding months over the previous five years (2018-2022). RESULTS: From October to December 2023, there was a 23.2% increase in the requests for mental health clinic treatments, compared to the same period in 2022. This surge extends a continuing upward trend in the utilization of mental health services observed since 2018. CONCLUSIONS: The study results emphasize the necessity for a responsive and flexible mental health system, to address immediate and long-term psychiatric care needs. The insights derived from these data are crucial for policymakers and clinicians to restructure mental health services, aiming to enhance the quality and accessibility of care for the Israeli population. DISCUSSION: The consistent rise in utilization of clinical mental health services significantly intensified following October 7, 2023. This echoes trends observed in global studies, underscoring the profound and enduring effects of traumatic experiences on mental health. These insights highlight the necessity for ongoing, high-quality therapeutic services and underscores the critical need for strategic policy development and increased investment in mental health services.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Terrorism , Humans , Israel , Terrorism/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Adult , Adolescent , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Male , Female , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of technologies has had a significant impact on patient safety and the quality of care and has increased globally. In the literature, it has been reported that people die annually due to adverse events (AEs), and various methods exist for investigating and measuring AEs. However, some methods have a limited scope, data extraction, and the need for data standardization. In Brazil, there are few studies on the application of trigger tools, and this study is the first to create automated triggers in ambulatory care. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a machine learning (ML)-based automated trigger for outpatient health care settings in Brazil. METHODS: A mixed methods research will be conducted within a design thinking framework and the principles will be applied in creating the automated triggers, following the stages of (1) empathize and define the problem, involving observations and inquiries to comprehend both the user and the challenge at hand; (2) ideation, where various solutions to the problem are generated; (3) prototyping, involving the construction of a minimal representation of the best solutions; (4) testing, where user feedback is obtained to refine the solution; and (5) implementation, where the refined solution is tested, changes are assessed, and scaling is considered. Furthermore, ML methods will be adopted to develop automated triggers, tailored to the local context in collaboration with an expert in the field. RESULTS: This protocol describes a research study in its preliminary stages, prior to any data gathering and analysis. The study was approved by the members of the organizations within the institution in January 2024 and by the ethics board of the University of São Paulo and the institution where the study will take place. in May 2024. As of June 2024, stage 1 commenced with data gathering for qualitative research. A separate paper focused on explaining the method of ML will be considered after the outcomes of stages 1 and 2 in this study. CONCLUSIONS: After the development of automated triggers in the outpatient setting, it will be possible to prevent and identify potential risks of AEs more promptly, providing valuable information. This technological innovation not only promotes advances in clinical practice but also contributes to the dissemination of techniques and knowledge related to patient safety. Additionally, health care professionals can adopt evidence-based preventive measures, reducing costs associated with AEs and hospital readmissions, enhancing productivity in outpatient care, and contributing to the safety, quality, and effectiveness of care provided. Additionally, in the future, if the outcome is successful, there is the potential to apply it in all units, as planned by the institutional organization. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/55466.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Machine Learning , Humans , Brazil , Patient SafetyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Data on the population-based epidemiology of hyperhidrosis (HH) are scarce. This study investigated the epidemiology and healthcare of HH in Germany. DESIGN AND SETTING: Claims data of adult persons insured by a German statutory health insurance (DAK-Gesundheit) between 2016 and 2020 were analysed. Included were persons aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of HH (confirmed inpatient or outpatient diagnosis in the observation year) who were continuously insured. Following outcomes were measured: prevalence and incidence rates, severity of hyperhidrosis and inpatient and outpatient care by a group of specialists. RESULTS: In 2020, 0.70% of insured adults were confirmed to have HH (mean age 59.5 years, SD 18.9, 61.6% female), with 9.24% having a 'localised' form, 8.65% a 'generalised' form and 84.80% an 'unspecified' form. 0.04% of the total population had a severe form. The incidence was 0.35%. Localised HH was more common in younger age groups (18 to <30 years), while older age groups (70 to <80 years) were significantly more likely to suffer from generalised HH. Systemic anticholinergics were used in 4.55%, and botulinum toxin injection therapy in 0.81%. General practitioners were most frequently involved in care. Inpatient stays due to HH were very rare, with 0.14% in 2019 and 0.04% in 2020. CONCLUSION: Multisource data analysis connecting primary and secondary data will be needed for a complete picture of the healthcare and epidemiology of HH.
Subject(s)
Hyperhidrosis , Insurance Claim Review , Humans , Hyperhidrosis/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Incidence , Prevalence , Aged, 80 and over , Cholinergic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
A long-term indwelling catheter may be indicated in clinical situations, such as chronic diseases of the genitourinary or neurological systems. In addition to the risks of infection, trauma, and bleeding, a catheter's permanence can affect psycho-emotional and socioeconomic dimensions. We aimed to understand how the need to use a long-term indwelling catheter affects this patient's self-perception, interrelationships, and self-care. We carried out a qualitative, descriptive study based on interviews with 17 patients, and applied thematic analysis and complex thinking. The different prognoses and expectations regarding the catheter influenced self-perception, adaptation, acceptance, or denial. The presence of a catheter, whether as a curative measure or for comfort, can affect self-image and sexuality, and generate insecurities and uncertainties, which require understanding the multidimensionality of situations that suffer interference from the personal, family, and social environment, as well as health systems' capacity to deal with it. Despite the challenges, the majority of participants reported a favorable disposition towards self-care, whether to enable catheter removal or to prevent injuries in lifelong indications.
O cateter vesical de longa permanência pode ser indicado em situações clínicas, como nas doenças crônicas do sistema genitourinário ou neurológico. Além dos riscos de infecção, traumas e sangramentos, a permanência do cateter pode afetar dimensões psicoemocionais e socioeconômicas. Objetivamos compreender como a necessidade de uso do cateter urinário por um longo prazo afeta a autopercepção, as interrelações e o autocuidado deste paciente. Realizamos um estudo qualitativo, descritivo, a partir da entrevista de 17 pacientes, e aplicamos a análise temática e o pensamento complexo. Os diferentes prognósticos e as expectativas em relação ao cateter influenciaram a autopercepção, a adaptação, sua aceitação ou negação. A presença do cateter, seja como medida curativa ou para conforto, pode afetar a autoimagem e a sexualidade, gerar inseguranças e incertezas, que requerem compreensão da multidimensionalidade das situações, que sofrem interferências do meio pessoal, familiar e social, bem como da capacidade dos sistemas de saúde para o seu enfrentamento. Apesar dos desafios, a maioria dos participantes relatou disposição favorável para o autocuidado, seja para viabilizar retirada do cateter, ou para prevenir agravos em indicações vitalícias.
Subject(s)
Catheters, Indwelling , Self Care , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Adult , Time Factors , Aged , Interviews as Topic , Self Concept , Ambulatory Care , Qualitative Research , Outpatients/psychology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Emergency departments are under year-round pressure, driven by high hospital bed occupancy and compounded by increasing attendances and admissions. In 2023, 1.5 million people waited 12 hours or more for a bed. Long waits are associated with increased mortality and there is a disproportionate impact on people living in more deprived areas. Addressing this problem begins with unity of purpose and vision, such that we all view emergency department performance as our responsibility, whatever our place in the healthcare system.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Emergency Service, Hospital , HumansABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases are a substantial burden on healthcare systems, contributing significantly to avoidable hospital admissions. We propose a Cardiology Ambulatory Care Pathway. METHODS: Conducted a 1 month study redirecting admission streams from primary and emergency care, into a Cardiology Ambulatory Care Hub providing triage in Hot Clinic, and access to a Multi-Modal Testing Platform. RESULTS: 98 patients were referred to the Ambulatory Care Hub, 91 of which avoided admission. 52 patients received care in the cardiology hub, 38 of which required further testing. CONCLUSION: We successfully streamlined various service streams, reducing admissions, and improving patient outcomes. Outpatient CTCA, ambulatory ECG, and echocardiography proved instrumental. We project a cost saving of £53,379 per month in bed days (£640,556 annual saving).
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Humans , Male , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Pathways , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Triage , Middle Aged , Aged , Cardiology , SARS-CoV-2 , PandemicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The study aim was to elucidate the effect of the 2024 Noto Peninsula earthquake on outpatient chemotherapy treatment of cancer survivors at Kanazawa Medical University Hospital (KMUH), Japan. METHODS: Medical and nursing records for January 4-31, 2024, from KMUH were retrospectively collected, and data for 286 participants were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 286 participants, 95.1% were able to attend their first scheduled appointment. Of the 12 (4.2%) who could not attend because of the earthquake, 7 (58.3%) rescheduled their appointments. A total of 8 participants (2.8%) were unable to attend their second scheduled appointment in January, despite being able to attend their first appointment; 3 (37.5%) of these participants reported that they were unable to attend their appointments because of the effect of the earthquake. Chemotherapy was not administered to 53 (18.5%) participants who did attend, mainly owing to neutropenia, progressive disease, rash, and anemia. Evacuation information was available for 25 participants (8.7%); of these, 8 (28.6%) evacuated to their homes, 7 (25.0%) to public shelters, and 4 (14.3%) to apartments near the hospital. Disaster status information was obtained from 62 participants (21.7%), and indicated experiences such as home damage, water outages, and relying on transportation assistance from family to attend appointments. CONCLUSIONS: Most cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy at KMUH were able to maintain outpatient visits. However, a few could not attend because of the earthquake. Further studies are needed to provide more detailed information on the effect of disasters on cancer survivors and the potential factors underlying non-attendance at medical appointments.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Earthquakes , Neoplasms , Outpatients , Humans , Male , Female , Japan/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute abdominal pain (AAP) is a major driver for capacity-use in emergency departments (EDs) worldwide. Yet, the health care utilization of patients with AAP before and after the ED remains unclear. The primary objective of this study was to describe adult patients presenting to the ED with AAP and their outpatient care (OC) use before and after the ED. Secondary objectives included description of hospitalization rates, in-hospital mortality, ED re-visits, and exploration of potential risk factors for hospitalization and ED re-visits. METHODS: For the analysis, we combined routine hospital data from patients who visited 15 EDs in Germany in 2016 with their statutory health insurance OC claims data from 2014 to 2017. Adult patients were included based on a chief complaint or an ED diagnosis indicating unspecific AAP or the Manchester Triage System indicator "Abdominal pain in adults". Baseline characteristics, ED diagnosis, frequency and reason of hospitalization, frequency and type of prior-OC (prOC) use up to 3 days before and of post-OC use up to 30 days after the ED visit. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 28,085 adults aged ≥ 20 years with AAP. 39.8% were hospitalized, 33.9% sought prOC before the ED visit (48.6% of them were hospitalized) and 62.7% sought post-OC up to 30 days after the ED visit. Hospitalization was significantly more likely for elderly patients (aged 65 and above vs. younger; adjusted OR 3.05 [95% CI 2.87; 3.25]), prOC users (1.71 [1.61; 1.90]) and men (1.44 [1.37; 1.52]). In-hospital mortality rate was 3.1% overall. Re-visiting the ED within 30 days was more likely for elderly patients (1.32 [1.13; 1.55) and less likely for those with prOC use (0.37 [0.31; 0.44]). CONCLUSIONS: prOC use was associated with more frequent hospitalizations but fewer ED re-visits. ED visits by prOC patients without subsequent hospitalization may indicate difficulties of OC resources to meet the complex diagnostic requirements and expectations of this patient population. Fewer ED re-visits in prOC users indicate effective care in this subgroup.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Humans , Male , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Germany/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult , Abdomen, Acute/diagnosis , Emergency Room VisitsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The GOAL Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (NCT04538157) is now underway, investigating the impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for frail older people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary outcome is the attainment of patient-identified goals at 3 months, assessed using the goal attainment scaling process. The protocol requires a dedicated process evaluation that will occur alongside the main trial, to investigate issues of implementation, mechanisms of impact and contextual factors that may influence intervention success. This process evaluation will offer novel insights into how and why CGA might be beneficial for frail older adults with CKD and provide guidance when considering how to implement this complex intervention into clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This process evaluation protocol follows guidance from the Medical Research Council and published guidance specific for the evaluation of cluster-randomised trials. A mixed methodological approach will be taken using data collected as part of the main trial and data collected specifically for the process evaluation. Recruitment and process data will include site feasibility surveys, screening logs and site issues registers from all sites, and minutes of meetings with intervention and control sites. Redacted CGA letters will be analysed both descriptively and qualitatively. Approximately 60 semistructured interviews will be analysed with a qualitative approach using a reflexive thematic analysis, with both inductive and deductive approaches underpinned by an interpretivist perspective. Qualitative analyses will be reported according to the Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research guidelines. The Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guidelines will also be followed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted through Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2020/QMS/62883). Dissemination will occur through peer-reviewed journals and feedback to trial participants will be facilitated through the central coordinating centre. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04538157.
Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Aged , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Patient-Centered Care , Goals , Frail Elderly , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Ambulatory Care/methods , Ambulatory Care/standardsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate deaths, hospitalizations, and persistence of symptoms in patients with COVID-19 after infection in an outpatient setting during the first COVID-19 wave in Brazil. METHODS: This prospective cohort was between April 2020 and February 2021. Hospitalized or non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients until five days after symptom onset were included. The outcomes measured were incidence of death, hospitalization, and persistence of more than two symptoms 60 days after discharge. RESULTS: Out of 1,198 patients enrolled in the study, 66.7% were hospitalized. A total of 289 patients died (1 [0.3%] non-hospitalized and 288 [36%] hospitalized). At 60 days, patients non-hospitalized during admission had more persistent symptoms (16.2%) compared to hospitalized (37.1%). The COVID-19 severity variables associated with the persistence of two or more symptoms were increased age (OR= 1.03; p=0.015), respiratory rate at hospital admission (OR= 1.11; p=0.005), length of hospital stay of more than 60 days (OR= 12.24; p=0.026), and need for intensive care unit admission (OR= 2.04; p=0.038). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 survivors who were older, tachypneic at admission, had a hospital length of stay >60 days, and were admitted to the intensive care unit had more persistent symptoms than patients who did not require hospitalization in the early COVID-19 waves.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04479488.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Brazil/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Overall, research on social determinants of access and quality of outpatient care in Germany is scarce. Therefore, social disparities (according to sex, age, income, migration background, and health insurance) in perceived access and quality of consultation in outpatient care (primary care physicians and specialists) in Germany were explored in this study. METHODS: Analyses made use of a cross-sectional online survey. An adult population sample was randomly drawn from a panel which was recruited offline (N = 2,201). Perceived access was assessed by waiting time for an appointment (in days) and travel time to the practice (in minutes), while quality of consultation was measured by consultation time (in minutes) and quality of communication (scale of four items, Cronbach's Alpha 0.89). RESULTS: In terms of primary care, perceived access and quality of consultation was worse among women compared to men. Estimated consultation time was shorter among people with statutory health insurance compared to privately insured respondents. Regarding specialist care, people aged 60 years and older reported shorter waiting times and better quality of communication. Lower income groups reported lower quality of communication, while perceived access and quality of consultation was worse among respondents with a statutory health insurance. Variances explained by the social characteristics ranged between 1% and 4% for perceived access and between 3% and 7% for quality of consultation. CONCLUSION: We found social disparities in perceived access and quality of consultation in outpatient care in Germany. Such disparities in access may indicate structural discrimination, while disparities in quality of consultation may point to interpersonal discrimination in health care.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Germany , Female , Male , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/standards , Aged , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/standards , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Adolescent , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Brief motivational coaching, integrated into health care; seems promising to address physical inactivity of people with serious mental illness (SMI). AIMS: To test the impact of a self-determined health coaching approach (the "SAMI" intervention) during outpatient mental health treatment on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) of people with SMI. METHODS: Adults (mean age = 41.9, SD = 10.9) with an ICD-10 diagnosis of mental illness were semi-randomized to the SAMI-intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). The IG received 30 minutes of health coaching based on the self-determination theory (SDT). MVPA and sedentary time (ST) were measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form (IPAQ-SF) and symptoms of mental illness with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18), each at baseline and follow-up (3-4 months). Differences in primary (MVPA) and secondary (ST, BSI-18) outcomes were evaluated using negative binomial regressions and general linear models. RESULTS: In the IG (n = 30), MVPA increased from 278 (interquartile range [IQR] = 175-551) to 435 (IQR = 161-675) min/week compared to a decrease from 250 (IQR = 180-518) to 155 (IQR = 0-383) min/week in the CG (n = 26; adjusted relative difference at follow-up: Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.17-3.93, p = 0.014). There were no statistically significant differences in ST and BSI-18. CONCLUSIONS: Brief self-determined health coaching during outpatient treatment could increase post-treatment MVPA in people with SMI, potentially up to a clinically relevant level. However, great uncertainty (for all outcomes) weakens the assessment of clinical relevance.
Subject(s)
Exercise , Mental Disorders , Motivation , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology , Pilot Projects , Middle Aged , Ambulatory Care , Outpatients/psychology , Mentoring/methods , Health Promotion/methods , Personal AutonomyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Out-of-home mobility, defined as active and passive movement through external environments, is a resource for autonomy, quality of life, and self-realization in older age. Various factors influence out-of-home mobility, primarily studied in urban settings. The study aims to examine associated factors in a study population aged 75 and above in rural areas. METHODS: Baseline data from the MOBILE trial involving 212 participants aged 75 and above and collected between June 2021 and October 2022 were analyzed. Out-of-home mobility was measured temporally as time out of home (TOH) and spatially as convex hull (CHull) using GPS over seven days. Mixed models considered outpatient care parameters as well as personal, social, and environmental factors along with covariates such as age and gender. RESULTS: Participants in the MOBILE study (average age 81.5; SD: 4.1; 56.1% female) exhibited average out-of-home mobility of TOH: 319.3â¯min (SD: 196.3) and CHull: 41.3 (SD: 132.8). Significant associations were found for age (TOH: ßâ¯= -0.039, pâ¯< 0.001), social network (TOH: ßâ¯= 0.123, pâ¯< 0.001), living arrangement (CHull: ßâ¯= 0.689, pâ¯= 0.035), health literacy (CHull: ßâ¯= 0.077, pâ¯= 0.008), sidewalk quality (ßâ¯= 0.366, pâ¯= 0.003), green space ratio (TOH: ßâ¯= 0.005, pâ¯= 0.047), outpatient care utilization (TOH: ßâ¯= -0.637, pâ¯< 0.001, CHull: ßâ¯= 1.532; pâ¯= 0.025), and active driving (TOH: ßâ¯= -0.361, pâ¯= 0.004). DISCUSSION: Previously known multifactorial associations related to objectively measured out-of-home mobility in old age could be confirmed in rural areas. Novel and relevant for research and practice is the significant correlation between out-of-home mobility and outpatient care utilization.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Mobility Limitation , Rural Population , Humans , Aged , Female , Male , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Germany , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Geographic Information SystemsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) are common in multimorbid patients. This study aims to describe PIMs and PPOs in an open-access outpatient setting and to investigate any association between continuity of care (CoC) and PIMs and PPOs in multimorbid older patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using patient-confirmed outpatient medication plans to describe PIMs and PPOs using the 'Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescription/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment' version 2. Four Poisson regressions modelled the number of PIMs and PPOs using context-adapted versions of the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) and the Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI) as measures for CoC. SETTING: Southern Germany, outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: 321 participants of the LoChro-trial at 12-month follow-up (both arms). The LoChro-trial compared healthcare involving an additional care manager with usual care. Inclusion criteria were age over 64, local residence and scoring over one in the Identification of Older patients at Risk Screening Tool. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Numbers of PIMs and PPOs. RESULTS: The mean number of PIMs was 1.5 (SD 1.5), lower than the average number of PPOs at 2.9 (SD 1.7). CoC showed similar results for both indices with a mean of 0.548 (SD 0.279) for MMCI and 0.514 (SD 0.262) for UPC. Both models predicting PPOs indicated more PPOs with higher CoC; statistical significance was only demonstrated for MMCI (MMCI~PPO: Exp(B)=1.42, 95% CI (1.11; 1.81), p=0.004; UPC~PPO: Exp(B)=1.29, 95% CI (0.99; 1.67), p=0.056). No significant association between PIMs and CoC was found (MMCI~PIM: Exp(B)=0.72, 95% CI (0.50; 1.03), p=0.072; UPC~PIM: Exp(B)=0.83, 95% CI (0.57; 1.21), p=0.337). CONCLUSION: The results did not show a significant association between higher CoC and lesser PIMs. Remarkably, an association between increased CoC, represented through MMCI, and more PPOs was found. Consultation of different care providers in open-access healthcare systems could possibly ameliorate under-prescribing in multimorbid older patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00013904.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Continuity of Patient Care , Inappropriate Prescribing , Humans , Germany , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Male , Female , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Aged, 80 and over , Potentially Inappropriate Medication ListABSTRACT
To provide insight on how ambulatory care practices can reduce emergency department (ED) visits, we studied changes in Medicare ED visits for primary and specialty care practices in the Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative. We compared practices that transformed more vs less during the 6-year period ending in 2021 (3,773 practices). Using data from a practice transformation assessment tool completed at multiple intervals, we found improvement in the transformation score was associated with reduced ED visits by 6% and 4% for primary and specialty care practices, respectively, 3 to 4 years after first assessment. Transformation in 5 of 8 domains contributed to reduced ED visits.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Medicare , Primary Health Care , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , United States , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , Organizational InnovationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is no standardized practice in pediatric pain assessment with burn injuries in the outpatient clinic setting. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify reliable, validated tools to measure pain in the pediatric burn clinic population. METHODS: The literature search for this integrative review was conducted using the databases of PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane, and Embase from 2011 to 2023. Quality and relevance were appraised using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Reporting was done according to a Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. RESULTS: Fourteen articles and two clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria and were included in this review. CONCLUSION: The Pain Observation Scale for Young Children and the COMFORT Behavior Scale tools have shown good reliability and construct validity and can be safely used to measure background and procedural pain in daily burn practice. Further research on reliable, validated pain assessment techniques in the pediatric burn population is needed.
Subject(s)
Burns , Pain Measurement , Humans , Burns/nursing , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain Measurement/nursing , Child , Reproducibility of Results , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Outpatients , Ambulatory Care/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/nursing , AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is a critical measure of the quality of healthcare services provided by healthcare facilities. However, very few studies, particularly in Ethiopia, which includes the study area, have specifically examined these discrepancies among people who use outpatient care. In this study, satisfaction levels and associated factors were compared between insured and uninsured patients receiving outpatient services at public health institutions in Hadiya Zone, southern Ethiopia. METHODS: A facility-based comparative cross-sectional study design was employed on 630 patients using multistage and systematic random sampling. Data were collected using a pretested and structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. Results of the analysis were presented in text, tables, and graphs as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict associations between predictors and the outcome variable. Statistical significance was declared at p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 344(55.48%) patients were satisfied with the service they received, of which 206(65.8%) out of 313 with a 95% CI [60.7-71.2%] were insured and 138(44.95%) out of 307 with a 95% CI [39.4-5.1%] were uninsured. Among insured patients, factors associated with higher satisfaction included having a family size less than five members [AOR = 3.3, 95% CI; 1.5, 7.4], perceived fair waiting time to be seen[AOR = 2.35, 95% CI; 1.02, 5.5], perceived short waiting time to be seen[AOR = 8.12, 95% CI; 1.6, 41.3], having all ordered laboratory tests available within the facility[AOR = 7.89, 95% CI; 3.5, 17.5], having some ordered laboratory tests within the facility[AOR = 2.97, 95% CI; 1.25, 7.01] having all prescribed medications available within the facility[AOR = 16.11, 95% CI; 6.25, 41.5], having some prescribed medications available within the facility[AOR = 13.11, 95% CI; 4.7, 36.4]. Among non-insured patients, factors associated with higher satisfaction included urban residency, a fair and short perceived time to be seen, having ordered laboratory tests within the facility, and having prescribed drugs within the facility. CONCLUSION: This study identified lower overall satisfaction, particularly among uninsured patients. Enrollment in the CBHI program significantly impacted satisfaction, with both groups reporting lower levels compared to enrollment periods. Access to essential services, wait times, and socio-demographic factors identified as associated factors with patient satisfaction regardless of insurance status.