ABSTRACT
This study investigates the clustering patterns of human ß-secretase 1 (BACE-1) inhibitors using complex network methodologies based on various distance functions, including Euclidean, Tanimoto, Hamming, and Levenshtein distances. Molecular descriptor vectors such as molecular mass, Merck Molecular Force Field (MMFF) energy, Crippen partition coefficient (ClogP), Crippen molar refractivity (MR), eccentricity, Kappa indices, Synthetic Accessibility Score, Topological Polar Surface Area (TPSA), and 2D/3D autocorrelation entropies are employed to capture the diverse properties of these inhibitors. The Euclidean distance network demonstrates the most reliable clustering results, with strong agreement metrics and minimal information loss, indicating its robustness in capturing essential structural and physicochemical properties. Tanimoto and Hamming distance networks yield valuable clustering outcomes, albeit with moderate performance, while the Levenshtein distance network shows significant discrepancies. The analysis of eigenvector centrality across different networks identifies key inhibitors acting as hubs, which are likely critical in biochemical pathways. Community detection results highlight distinct clustering patterns, with well-defined communities providing insights into the functional and structural groupings of BACE-1 inhibitors. The study also conducts non-parametric tests, revealing significant differences in molecular descriptors, validating the clustering methodology. Despite its limitations, including reliance on specific descriptors and computational complexity, this study offers a comprehensive framework for understanding molecular interactions and guiding therapeutic interventions. Future research could integrate additional descriptors, advanced machine learning techniques, and dynamic network analysis to enhance clustering accuracy and applicability.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/antagonists & inhibitors , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/antagonists & inhibitors , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/chemistry , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/metabolism , Humans , Cluster Analysis , Protease Inhibitors/chemistry , Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protease Inhibitors/metabolism , Models, Molecular , Structure-Activity Relationship , Enzyme Inhibitors/chemistry , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Successive cleavages of amyloid precursor protein C-terminal fragment with 99 residues (APP-C99) by γ-secretase result in amyloid-ß (Aß) peptides of varying lengths. Most cleavages have a step size of three residues. To elucidate the underlying mechanism, we determined the atomic structures of human γ-secretase bound individually to APP-C99, Aß49, Aß46, and Aß43. In all cases, the substrate displays the same structural features: a transmembrane α-helix, a three-residue linker, and a ß-strand that forms a hybrid ß-sheet with presenilin 1 (PS1). Proteolytic cleavage occurs just ahead of the substrate ß-strand. Each cleavage is followed by unwinding and translocation of the substrate α-helix by one turn and the formation of a new ß-strand. This mechanism is consistent with existing biochemical data and may explain the cleavages of other substrates by γ-secretase.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Amyloid beta-Peptides , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor , Presenilin-1 , Humans , Amyloid beta-Peptides/chemistry , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Crystallography, X-Ray , Models, Molecular , Peptide Fragments/metabolism , Peptide Fragments/chemistry , Presenilin-1/chemistry , Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical , Protein Conformation, beta-Strand , Proteolysis , Substrate SpecificityABSTRACT
Deposition of amyloid-ß (Aß) peptides in the brain is a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease. Aßs are generated through sequential proteolysis of the amyloid precursor protein by the γ-secretase complexes (GSECs). Aß peptide length, modulated by the Presenilin (PSEN) and APH-1 subunits of GSEC, is critical for Alzheimer's pathogenesis. Despite high relevance, mechanistic understanding of the proteolysis of Aß, and its modulation by APH-1, remain incomplete. Here, we report cryo-EM structures of human GSEC (PSEN1/APH-1B) reconstituted into lipid nanodiscs in apo form and in complex with the intermediate Aß46 substrate without cross-linking. We find that three non-conserved and structurally divergent APH-1 regions establish contacts with PSEN1, and that substrate-binding induces concerted rearrangements in one of the identified PSEN1/APH-1 interfaces, providing structural basis for APH-1 allosteric-like effects. In addition, the GSEC-Aß46 structure reveals an interaction between Aß46 and loop 1PSEN1, and identifies three other H-bonding interactions that, according to functional validation, are required for substrate recognition and efficient sequential catalysis.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Amyloid beta-Peptides , Cryoelectron Microscopy , Membrane Proteins , Presenilin-1 , Humans , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Presenilin-1/metabolism , Presenilin-1/chemistry , Presenilin-1/genetics , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Amyloid beta-Peptides/chemistry , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Membrane Proteins/chemistry , Endopeptidases/metabolism , Endopeptidases/chemistry , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/metabolism , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/chemistry , Protein Binding , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , Protein Isoforms/chemistry , Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , Peptide Fragments/metabolism , Peptide Fragments/chemistry , Peptide Hydrolases/metabolism , Peptide Hydrolases/chemistry , Models, Molecular , ProteolysisABSTRACT
In binding free energy calculations, simulations must sample all relevant conformations of the system in order to obtain unbiased results. For instance, different ligands can bind to different metastable states of a protein, and if these protein conformational changes are not sampled in relative binding free energy calculations, the contribution of these states to binding is not accounted for and thus calculated binding free energies are inaccurate. In this work, we investigate the impact of different beta-sectretase 1 (BACE1) protein conformations obtained from x-ray crystallography on the binding of BACE1 inhibitors. We highlight how these conformational changes are not adequately sampled in typical molecular dynamics simulations. Furthermore, we show that insufficient sampling of relevant conformations induces substantial error in relative binding free energy calculations, as judged by a variation in calculated relative binding free energies up to 2 kcal/mol depending on the starting protein conformation. These results emphasize the importance of protein conformational sampling and pose this BACE1 system as a challenge case for further method development in the area of enhanced protein conformational sampling, either in combination with binding calculations or as an endpoint correction.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation , Thermodynamics , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/antagonists & inhibitors , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/chemistry , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/antagonists & inhibitors , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/metabolism , Humans , Crystallography, X-Ray , LigandsABSTRACT
Allosteric modulation plays a critical role in enzyme functionality and requires a deep understanding of the interactions between the active and allosteric sites. γ-Secretase (GS) is a key therapeutic target in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD), through its role in the synthesis of amyloid ß peptides that accumulate in AD patients. This study explores the structure and dynamic effects of GS modulation by E2012 binding, employing well-tempered metadynamics and conventional molecular dynamics simulations across three binding scenarios: (1) GS enzyme with and without L458 inhibitor, (2) the GS-substrate complex together with the modulator E2012 in two different binding modes, and (3) E2012 interacting with a C99 substrate fragment. Our findings reveal that the presence of L458 induces conformational changes that contribute to stabilization of the GS enzyme dynamics, previously reported as a key factor that allowed the resolution of the cryo-EM structure and the enhanced binding of E2012. Furthermore, we identified the most favorable binding site for E2012 within the GS-substrate complex, uncovering significant modulatory effects and a complex network of interactions that influence the position of the substrate for catalysis. In addition, we explore a potential substrate-modulator binding before the formation of the enzyme-substrate complex. The insights gained from our study emphasize the importance of these interactions in the development of potential therapeutic interventions that target the functionality of the GS enzyme in AD.
Subject(s)
Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Protein Binding , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/antagonists & inhibitors , Substrate Specificity , Humans , Protein Conformation , Allosteric Regulation/drug effects , AzepinesABSTRACT
Two phase-III clinical trials with anti-amyloid peptide antibodies have met their primary goal, i.e. slowing of Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression. However, antibody therapy may not be the optimal therapeutic modality for AD prevention, as we will discuss in the context of the earlier small molecules described as "γ-secretase modulators" (GSM). We review here the structure, function, and pathobiology of γ-secretases, with a focus on how mutations in presenilin genes result in early-onset AD. Significant progress has been made in generating compounds that act in a manner opposite to pathogenic presenilin mutations: they stabilize the proteinase-substrate complex, thereby increasing the processivity of substrate cleavage and altering the size spectrum of Aß peptides produced. We propose the term "γ-secretase allosteric stabilizers" (GSAS) to distinguish these compounds from the rather heterogenous class of GSM. The GSAS represent, in theory, a precision medicine approach to the prevention of amyloid deposition, as they specifically target a discrete aspect in a complex cell biological signalling mechanism that initiates the pathological processes leading to Alzheimer's disease.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Alzheimer Disease/prevention & control , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/genetics , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid beta-Peptides/genetics , Precision Medicine , Presenilins/therapeutic use , Presenilin-1/genetics , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/geneticsABSTRACT
Cleavage of the transmembrane domain (TMD) of amyloid-ß precursor protein (APP) by γ-secretase, an intramembrane aspartyl protease, generates Aß peptides of various lengths that form plaques in the brains of Alzheimer's disease patients. Although the debate has not been finally resolved whether these plaques trigger the onset of Alzheimer's or are side products, disease-related mutations suggest their implication in the etiology of the dementia. These occur both in presenilin, the catalytic subunit of γ-secretase, and in the TMD of APP. Despite two seminal cryo-electron microscopy structures that show the complex of γ-secretase with its substrates APP and Notch, the mechanism of γ-secretase is not yet fully understood. Especially on which basis it selects its substrates is still an enigma. The presenilin homolog PSH from the archaeon Methanoculleus marisnigri JR1 (MCMJR1) is catalytically active without accessory proteins in contrast to γ-secretase making it an excellent model for studies of the basic cleavage process. We here focused on the cell-free expression of PSH screening a range of conditions. Cleavage assays to verify the activity show that not only the yield, but mainly the activity of the protease depends on the careful selection of expression conditions. Optimal results were found for a cell-free expression at relatively low temperature, 20 °C, employing cell lysates prepared from E. coli Rosetta cells. To speed up protein preparation for immediate functional assays, a crude purification protocol was developed. This allows to produce ready-made PSH in a fast and efficient manner in less than two days.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Humans , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/genetics , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Cryoelectron Microscopy , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/genetics , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/chemistry , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor/metabolism , Presenilins/chemistry , Presenilins/metabolism , Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Amyloid beta-PeptidesABSTRACT
The intramembrane protease γ-secretase activates important signaling molecules, such as Notch receptors. It is still unclear, however, how different elements within the primary structure of substrate transmembrane domains (TMDs) contribute to their cleavability. Using a newly developed yeast-based cleavage assay, we identified three crucial regions within the TMDs of the paralogs Notch1 and Notch3 by mutational and gain-of-function approaches. The AAAA or AGAV motifs within the N-terminal half of the TMDs were found to confer strong conformational flexibility to these TMD helices, as determined by mutagenesis coupled to deuterium/hydrogen exchange. Crucial amino acids within the C-terminal half may support substrate docking into the catalytic cleft of presenilin, the enzymatic subunit of γ-secretase. Further, residues close to the C-termini of the TMDs may stabilize a tripartite ß-sheet in the substrate/enzyme complex. NMR structures reveal different extents of helix bending as well as an ability to adopt widely differing conformational substates, depending on the sequence of the N-terminal half. The difference in cleavability between Notch1 and Notch3 TMDs is jointly determined by the conformational repertoires of the TMD helices and the sequences of the C-terminal half, as suggested by mutagenesis and building molecular models. In sum, cleavability of a γ-secretase substrate is enabled by different functions of cooperating TMD regions, which deepens our mechanistic understanding of substrate/non-substrate discrimination in intramembrane proteolysis.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Proteolysis , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Models, Molecular , Mutation , Protein DomainsABSTRACT
The endopeptidase ADAM10 is a critical catalyst for the regulated proteolysis of key drivers of mammalian development, physiology, and non-amyloidogenic cleavage of APP as the primary α-secretase. ADAM10 function requires the formation of a complex with a C8-tetraspanin protein, but how tetraspanin binding enables positioning of the enzyme active site for membrane-proximal cleavage remains unknown. We present here a cryo-EM structure of a vFab-ADAM10-Tspan15 complex, which shows that Tspan15 binding relieves ADAM10 autoinhibition and acts as a molecular measuring stick to position the enzyme active site about 20 Å from the plasma membrane for membrane-proximal substrate cleavage. Cell-based assays of N-cadherin shedding establish that the positioning of the active site by the interface between the ADAM10 catalytic domain and the bound tetraspanin influences selection of the preferred cleavage site. Together, these studies reveal the molecular mechanism underlying ADAM10 proteolysis at membrane-proximal sites and offer a roadmap for its modulation in disease.
Subject(s)
ADAM10 Protein , Animals , ADAM10 Protein/chemistry , ADAM10 Protein/metabolism , ADAM10 Protein/ultrastructure , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Mammals/metabolism , Proteolysis , Tetraspanins/metabolism , HumansABSTRACT
Despite recent advances in research, the mechanism of Alzheimer's disease is not fully understood yet. Understanding the process of cleavage and then trimming of peptide substrates, can help selectively block γ-secretase (GS) to stop overproduction of the amyloidogenic products. Our GS-SMD server (https://gs-smd.biomodellab.eu/) allows cleaving and unfolding of all currently known GS substrates (more than 170 peptide substrates). The substrate structure is obtained by threading of the substrate sequence into the known structure of GS complex. The simulations are performed in an implicit water-membrane environment so they are performed rather quickly, 2-6 h per job, depending on the mode of calculations (part of GS complex or the whole structure). It is also possible to introduce mutations to the substrate and GS and pull any part of the substrate in any direction using the steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations with constant velocity. The obtained trajectories are visualized and analyzed in the interactive way. One can also compare multiple simulations using the interaction frequency analysis. GS-SMD server can be useful for revealing mechanisms of substrate unfolding and role of mutations in this process.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/genetics , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Catalytic Domain , Peptides/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Prepilin peptidases (PPP) are essential enzymes for the biogenesis of important virulence factors, such as type IV pili (T4P), type II secretion systems, and other T4P-related systems of bacteria and archaea. PPP inhibitors could be valuable pharmaceuticals, but only a few have been reported. Interestingly, PPP share similarities with presenilin enzymes from the gamma-secretase protease complex, which are linked to Alzheimer's disease. Numerous gamma-secretase inhibitors have been reported, and some have entered clinical trials, but none has been tested against PPP. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to develop a high-throughput screening (HTS) method to search for inhibitors of PPP from various chemical libraries and reported gamma-secretase inhibitors. METHOD: More than 15,000 diverse compounds, including 13 reported gamma-secretase inhibitors and other reported peptidase inhibitors, were screened to identify potential PPP inhibitors. RESULTS: The authors developed a novel screening method and screened 15,869 compounds. However, the screening did not identify a PPP inhibitor. Nevertheless, the study suggests that gamma-secretase is sufficiently different from PPP that specific inhibitors may exist in a larger chemical space. CONCLUSION: The authors believe that the HTS method that they describe has numerous advantages and encourage others to consider its application in the search for PPP inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Humans , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/therapeutic use , Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , Eukaryota , Fimbriae Proteins/therapeutic use , Presenilins/chemistry , Presenilins/therapeutic use , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative process with multifactorial characteristics. This disease follows the natural aging process, affecting mainly people over 65 years. Pharmacotherapeutic treatment currently combats symptoms related to cognitive function. Several targets have begun to attract the interest of the scientific community to develop new drug candidates which have better pharmacokinetic and lower toxicity parameters. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to design new candidates for acetylcholinesterase/ß-secretase (AChE/BACE1) multitarget inhibitor drugs. METHODS: 17 natural products were selected from the literature with anticholinesterase activity and 1 synthetic molecule with inhibitory activity for BACE1. Subsequently, the molecular docking study was performed, followed by the derivation of the pharmacophoric pattern and prediction of pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties. Finally, the hybrid prototype was designed. RESULTS: All selected molecules showed interactions with their respective target enzymes. Derivation of the pharmacophoric pattern from molecules that interacted with the AChE enzyme resulted in 3 pharmacophoric regions: an aromatic ring, an electron-acceptor region and a hydrophobic region. The molecules showed good pharmacokinetic and toxicological results, showing no warnings of mutagenicity and/or carcinogenicity. After the hybridization process, three hybrid molecules were obtained, which showed inhibitory activity for both targets. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that research in the field of medicinal chemistry is advancing towards the discovery of new drug candidates that bring a better quality of life to patients with AD.
Subject(s)
Acetylcholinesterase , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/chemistry , Humans , Molecular Docking Simulation , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
Alzheimer's disease is a progressive and irreversible neurodegenerative disease that accounts for 70-80% of dementia in the elderly. According to recent clinical data, the incidence of the disease is exponentially increasing with age. Beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme1 (BACE1) is an important molecule involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease due to its early role in the amyloid cascade. Cleavage of amyloid precursor protein by BACE1 is the rate-limiting step leading to the production and aggregation of amyloid-beta plaques. A number of natural products are being identified as non-competitive BACE1 inhibitors. In Ayurveda, Medhya rasayana is a group of medicinal herbs, specifically used for managing neurological disorders and is known to be effective in improving cognitivity and intellect. This study aimed to analyze the pharmacological activity of bio-active compounds in Medhya rasayana plants against BACE1, employing structure-based docking approach. 11 compounds out of 876 were identified as potential hits, based on docking scores, binding energies, and interactions with the critical residues of BACE1. Possible neurological activities of these compounds were predicted using PASS server. Out of the 11 compounds screened, two compounds, 'Convolidine' from the plant Convolvulus pleuricaulis Choisy and 'N-(4-hydroxybutyl) phthalimide' from Glycyrrhiza glabra satisfied the pharmacological parameters of Lipinski rule of filtering and ADMET prediction. The binding stability of these compounds against BACE1 was confirmed by molecular dynamic simulation and post dynamic MM/GBSA calculations. Detailed analysis of the interaction with the critical amino acids in the active site revealed the possible inhibitory potential of these compounds of medicinal plant origin against BACE1.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/chemistry , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/metabolism , Humans , Lead , Molecular Docking Simulation , Phytochemicals/pharmacology , Phytochemicals/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Tetraspanins are proteins that organize cell membranes via interactions with partner proteins mediated by their large ectodomain. In this issue of Structure, Lipper et al., 2022 have elucidated the structure of the first C8 tetraspanin and expand functional insight into how C8 tetraspanins regulate substrate specificity for the transmembrane protease ADAM10.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Membrane Proteins , ADAM10 Protein/metabolism , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Cell Membrane/metabolism , Membrane Proteins/chemistry , Tetraspanins/chemistry , Tetraspanins/genetics , Tetraspanins/metabolismABSTRACT
Regarding the critical role of amyloid-ß plaques in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, a series of aminoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives were designed and synthesized as potential anti-BACE1 agents targeting the production of amyloid-ß plaques. In vitro biological results demonstrated that compounds 7b and 7f exhibited the best inhibitory potency against BACE1 with IC50 values of 22.48 ± 2.06 and 30.61 ± 3.48 µM, respectively. Also, the ligandprotein docking evaluations revealed that compounds 7b and 7f could effectively bind with the different pockets of BACE1 through different interactions with the residue of the active site. The results of current studies underline the potential role of aminoimidazo[1,2-a] pyridine-containing pyrazole derivatives for developing novel BACE1 inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/chemistry , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/metabolism , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , Pyridines/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the grievous neurodegenerative disorder. Reportedly, many enzymes are responsible for this disease, in which notably, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and ß-secretase (BACE1) are largely involved for AD. An experimental study reports that silibinin molecule inhibits both AChE and BACE1 enzymes. Present study aims to understand the dual binding mechanism of silibinin in the active site of AChE and BACE1 from the intermolecular interactions, conformational flexibility, charge density distribution, binding energy and the stability of molecule. To obtain the above information, the molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) and QTAIM (quantum theory of atoms in molecules) calculations have been performed. The molecular docking reveals that silibinin molecule is forming strong and weak intermolecular interactions with the catalytic site of both enzymes. The QTAIM analysis for the binding pockets of both complexes shows the charge density distribution of intermolecular interactions. The electrostatic potential map displays the electronegative/positive regions at the interaction zone of silibinin with AChE and BACE1 complexes. The MD simulation confirms that the silibinin molecule is stable in the active site of AChE and BACE1 enzymes. The binding free energies of silibinin with both enzymes are more favorable to have the interactions.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Humans , Molecular Docking Simulation , Silybin , Acetylcholinesterase/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Protein Binding , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/chemistry , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Catalytic DomainABSTRACT
Our previous anti-Alzheimer's studies on crude extracts, essential oils and isolated compounds including ß-sitostrol from Polygonum hydropiper L, motivated us for further studies against beta amyloid cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) and monoamine oxidases (MAO-A), (MAO-B) enzymes. Before performing detailed studies on the compounds using animal models and immunohistochemistry, molecular docking study was performed against three vital enzymes implicated in several neurological disorders including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), depression and anxiety to predict their inhibitory potential against important enzymes. Beta amyloid cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) is important enzyme that catalyze pathological amyloidogenic pathway of processing amyloid precursor proteins to form neurotoxic amyloid plaques. Subsequently, BACE1 inhibitors are considered an important tool in the management of AD. MAOs have been categorized in two well-known groups MAO-A and MAO-B, based on their differential affinity for various monoamines substrates. MAO-A has more affinity for norepinephrine and 5-HT, whereas, MAO-B mainly catalyze the breakdown of dopamine and 2-phenylathylamine (PEA) and other monoamines. Subsequently, they have divergent behavioral outcomes and play a significant role in pathophysiology of several neurodegenerative disorders like AD, depression, drug abuse, migraines, schizophrenia, Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Molecular docking was carried out to predict the binding modes of ß-sitosterol and stigmasterol in the binding pockets of BACE1 (beta-sectretase 1) and MAO (monoamine oxidase A, B) enzymes. The 3 D structure of BACE1 (PDB ID: 2QP8), MAO A (PDB ID: 2ZPX) and MAO B (PDB ID: 2XFN) were downloaded from protein databank. The 3 D structures were then subjected to protonation and energy minimization using default parameters of MOE. Three dimensional structures of ß-sitosterol and stigmasterol were built by using Molecular Builder Module program implemented in MOE and saved as a (.mdb) file for molecular docking. Subsequently, the energy of both the compounds were minimized up to 0.05 Gradient using MMFF 94 s force field implemented in MOE. Both the compounds were docked into the active site of proteins using the Triangular Matching docking method (default) and 10 different conformations for each compound were generated. To obtain minimum energy structures the ligands were allowed to be flexible during docking. At the end of docking, the predicted ligand-protein complexes were analyzed for molecular interactions. Overall the docking results showed that these compounds showed good interaction with active site residues of BACE1 as compare to MAO-A and MAO-B. Furthermore, ß-sitosterol showed good interaction with BACE1 as compare to stigmasterol.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Parkinson Disease , Phytosterols , Polygonum , Animals , Amyloid beta-Peptides/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Polygonum/metabolism , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases , Molecular Docking Simulation , Stigmasterol , Monoamine Oxidase , Alzheimer Disease/metabolism , LigandsABSTRACT
ß-amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme1 (BACE1) has prominently been an important drug design target implicated in Alzheimer's disease pathway. The failure rate of most of the already tested drugs at different clinical phases remains a major concern. Recently, AM-6494 was reported as a novel potent, highly selective, and orally effective inhibitor against BACE1. AM-6494 displayed no alteration of skin/fur colour in animal studies, an adverse effect common to previous BACE1 inhibitors. However, the atomistic molecular mechanism of BACE1 inhibition by AM-6494 remains unclear. To elucidate the binding mechanism of AM-6494 relative to umibecestat (CNP-520) as well as the structural changes when bound to BACE1, advanced computational techniques such as accelerated MD simulation and principal component analysis have been utilised. The results demonstrated higher binding affinity of AM-6494 at BACE1 with van der Waals as dominant energy contributor compared to umibecestat. Conformational monitoring of the ß-hairpin flap covering the active site revealed an effective flap closure when bound with AM-6494 compared to CNP-520, which predominantly alternates between semi-open and closed conformations. The observed effective flap closure of AM-6494 explains its higher inhibitory power towards BACE1. Besides the catalytic Asp32/228 dyad, Tyr14, Leu30, Tyr71 and Gly230 represent critical residues in the potency of these inhibitors at BACE1 binding interface. The findings highlighted in this research provide a basis to explain AM-6494 high inhibitory potency and might assist in the design of new inhibitors with improved selectivity and potency for BACE1.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases/chemistry , Catalytic Domain , Enzyme Inhibitors/chemistry , Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Humans , Molecular Dynamics SimulationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most predominant cause of dementia, has evolved tremendously with an escalating frequency, mainly affecting the elderly population. An effective means of delaying, preventing, or treating AD is yet to be achieved. The failure rate of dementia drug trials has been relatively higher than in other disease-related clinical trials. Hence, multi-targeted therapeutic approaches are gaining attention in pharmacological developments. AIMS: As an extension of our earlier reports, we have performed docking and molecular dynamic (MD) simulation studies for the same 13 potential ligands against beta-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1) and γ-secretase as a therapeutic target for AD. The In-silico screening of these ligands as potential inhibitors of BACE-1 and γ-secretase was performed using AutoDock enabled PyRx v-0.8. The protein-ligand interactions were analyzed in Discovery Studio 2020 (BIOVIA). The stability of the most promising ligand against BACE-1 and γ-secretase was evaluated by MD simulation using Desmond-2018 (Schrodinger, LLC, NY, USA). RESULTS: The computational screening revealed that the docking energy values for each of the ligands against both the target enzymes were in the range of -7.0 to -10.1 kcal/mol. Among the 13 ligands, 8 (55E, 6Z2, 6Z5, BRW, F1B, GVP, IQ6, and X37) showed binding energies of ≤-8 kcal/mol against BACE-1 and γ-secretase. For the selected enzyme targets, BACE-1 and γ-secretase, 6Z5 displayed the lowest binding energy of -10.1 and -9.8 kcal/mol, respectively. The MD simulation study confirmed the stability of BACE-6Z5 and γ-secretase-6Z5 complexes and highlighted the formation of a stable complex between 6Z5 and target enzymes. CONCLUSION: The virtual screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation studies revealed the potential of these multi-enzyme targeted ligands. Among the studied ligands, 6Z5 seems to have the best binding potential and forms a stable complex with BACE-1 and γ-secretase. We recommend the synthesis of 6Z5 for future in-vitro and in-vivo studies.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/chemistry , Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases/metabolism , Humans , Ligands , Molecular Docking SimulationABSTRACT
Proteolytic processing of amyloid precursor protein (APP) plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Sequential cleavage of APP by ß and γ secretases leads to the generation of Aß40 (non-amyloidogenic) and Aß42 (amyloidogenic) peptides. Presenilin-1 (PS1) or presenilin-2 (PS2) play the role of a catalytic subunit of γ-secretase. Multiple familial AD (FAD) mutations in APP, PS1, or PS2 result in an increased Aß42:Aß40 ratio and the accumulation of toxic Aß42 oligomers and plaques in patient brains. In this study, we perform molecular modeling of the APP complex with γ-secretase and analyze potential effects of FAD mutations in APP and PS1. We noticed that all FAD mutations in the APP transmembrane domain are predicted to cause an increase in the local disorder of its secondary structure. Based on structural analysis of known γ-secretase structures, we propose that APP can form a complex with γ-secretase in 2 potential conformations-M1 and M2. In conformation, the M1 transmembrane domain of APP forms a contact with the perimembrane domain that follows transmembrane domain 6 (TM6) in the PS1 structure. In conformation, the M2 transmembrane domain of APP forms a contact with transmembrane domain 7 (TM7) in the PS1 structure. By analyzing the effects of PS1-FAD mutations on the local protein disorder index, we discovered that these mutations increase the conformational flexibility of M2 and reduce the conformational flexibility of M1. Based on these results, we propose that M2 conformation, but not M1 conformation, of the γ secretase complex with APP leads to the amyloidogenic (Aß42-generating) processing of APP. Our model predicts that APP processing in M1 conformation is favored by curved membranes, such as the membranes of early endosomes. In contrast, APP processing in M2 conformation is likely to be favored by relatively flat membranes, such as membranes of late endosomes and plasma membranes. These predictions are consistent with published biochemical analyses of APP processing at different subcellular locations. Our results also suggest that specific inhibitors of Aß42 production could be potentially developed by selectively targeting the M2 conformation of the γ secretase complex with APP.