ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients often develop the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS). Current sedation guidelines mainly rely on intravenous agents. Inhaled sedatives are a promising alternative with favorable pharmacokinetics and potential benefits in critical care settings. However, their application in Latin America remains unexplored. METHODS: Case-series study that included adult ICU patients who underwent deep sedation with sevoflurane using the SEDANA anesthetic conserving device. Data on demographics, sedation protocols, adverse events, and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis assessed changes over time in laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included, with sevoflurane administered via artificial airways. Inhaled sedation led to the successful cease of intravenous sedatives in 10 of 11 patients, and reduction of at least 30% in opioid dose. No significant adverse effects were observed. Barriers to adherence included device-related issues and challenges in healthcare staff training. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane effectively achieved sedation goals in ICU patients, reducing the need for additional sedatives and opioids. Our findings support the safety and efficacy of inhaled sedatives in ICU settings and highlight the importance of further research in this area. Longer-term studies are needed to fully determine the impact of inhaled sedatives in ICU patients.
Introducción: Los pacientes críticamente enfermos a menudo desarrollan el Síndrome Post-Cuidados Intensivos (PICS). Las pautas actuales de sedación se basan principalmente en agentes intravenosos. Los sedantes inhalados son una alternativa prometedora con farmacocinética favorable y beneficios potenciales en entornos de cuidados críticos. Sin embargo, su aplicación en América Latina sigue sin explorarse. Métodos: Estudio de serie de casos que incluyó a pacientes adultos de UCI que recibieron sedación profunda con sevoflurano utilizando el dispositivo conservador anestésico SEDANA. Se recopilaron datos demográficos, protocolos de sedación, eventos adversos y resultados. El análisis estadístico evaluó los cambios en el tiempo en los parámetros de laboratorio. Resultados: Se incluyeron once pacientes, a quienes se les administró sevoflurano a través de vías respiratorias artificiales. Se incluyeron once pacientes, a quienes se les administró sevoflurano a través de vías respiratorias artificiales. La sedación inhalada llevó a la cesación exitosa de sedantes intravenosos en 10 de los 11 pacientes, con una reducción de al menos 30% la dosis de opioides. No se observaron efectos adversos significativos. Las barreras para la adherencia incluyeron problemas relacionados con el dispositivo y desafíos en la capacitación del personal de salud. Conclusión: El sevoflurano logró de manera efectiva los objetivos de sedación en pacientes de UCI, reduciendo la necesidad de sedantes y opioides adicionales. Nuestros hallazgos respaldan la seguridad y eficacia de los sedantes inhalados en entornos de UCI y resaltan la importancia de una mayor investigación en esta área. Se necesitan estudios a más largo plazo para determinar completamente el impacto de los sedantes inhalados en pacientes de UCI.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Intensive Care Units , Sevoflurane , Humans , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Aged , Adult , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacokinetics , Deep Sedation/methods , Critical Illness , Administration, Inhalation , Critical Care/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Remimazolam is manifested by rapid action, hemodynamic stability, and fast recovery. Our study aimed to investigate whether the quality of recovery (QoR) after remimazolam anesthesia in patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor, which is predominantly performed in the elderly population, is not inferior to that after conventional anesthesia using sevoflurane. METHODS: Thirty-four patients were randomly allocated into either of group S (nâ =â 17, receiving sevoflurane anesthesia), or group R (nâ =â 17, receiving remimazolam anesthesia). The QoR was assessed by Korean version of QoR-15 questionnaire, on the day before and after the surgery. Scores acquired for each individual item, QoR-15 scores categorized into 5 dimensions (physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, emotional state, and pain), and overall global score were subjected to comparative analysis. The primary outcome was postoperative global QoR-15, and a noninferiority delta value of 8.0 was employed. RESULTS: The postoperative global QoR-15 in the group S was 141 (134-146), and in the groups R was 133 (128-142) (Pâ =â .152). The mean difference of global QoR-15 (group S-group R) was 1.471 (95% confidence interval of -10.204 to 13.146), and the lower 95% confidence interval margin was lower than the noninferiority margin of -8.0. When comparing the QoR-15 sorted by 5 dimensions, pain scored higher in the group S (20 [18-20]) compared to the group R (15 [15-20], Pâ =â .032). CONCLUSION: The postoperative QoR following transurethral resection of bladder tumor was found to be lower in patients anesthetized with remimazolam in comparison to those anesthetized with sevoflurane.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Benzodiazepines , Sevoflurane , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/therapeutic use , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Female , Aged , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Transurethral Resection of BladderABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the environmental impact of travel and anesthetic gas emissions associated with treating early childhood caries at a single institution. Methods: Outpatient preventive, treatment, and modeled general anesthesia (GA) cases in children 71 months old and younger were included in this retrospective chart review. The main outcomes were kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (kgCO2e) for travel- and anesthetic gas-related emissions. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used. Results: Most subjects had a caries treatment visit (n equals 3,630 out of 5,767), and nine percent of treatment visits (n equals 353 out of 3,630) received nitrous oxide (N2O), which added 29.4 kgCO2eto the visit emissions. Children without caries treatment had lower travel-related emissions (median equals 7.5 kgCO2e; interquartile range [IQR] equals 7.6) than children with caries treatment (median without N2O equals 8.7 kgCO2e; IQR equals 18.2; median with N2O equals 8.4 kgCO2e; IQR equals 10.3). Modeled GA travel emissions were estimated at 16.4 kgCO2e (IQR equals 21.9) with between 3.8-12.9 kgCO2e in anesthetic gas emissions. Total emissions were greatest for N2O treatment visits (median equals 43.3 kgCO2e; IQR equals 22.8). Conclusions: Travel-related emissions were greatest for children requiring caries treatment. Minimizing patient travel may reduce environmental impact. Nitrous oxide contributes a significant amount to a dental visit???s environmental impact. Community-focused models of care and applying systematic and practical case selection to reduce excess N2O emissions could reduce dental care-related carbon emissions.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Dental Caries , Nitrous Oxide , Humans , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Child, Preschool , Retrospective Studies , Nitrous Oxide/analysis , Nitrous Oxide/administration & dosage , Infant , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Female , Male , Carbon Dioxide/analysis , Anesthesia, General , Anesthesia, Dental , Dental Care for ChildrenABSTRACT
Inhalational anaesthetic agents are routinely used in veterinary anaesthesia practices, yet their consumption contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impact. We conducted a 55-day observational study at a veterinary teaching hospital in Switzerland, monitoring isoflurane and sevoflurane consumption across small, equine and farm animal clinics and analysed the resulting environmental impact. Results revealed that in total, 9.36 L of isoflurane and 1.27 L of sevoflurane were used to anaesthetise 409 animals across 1,489 h. Consumption rates varied among species, with small and farm animals ranging between 8.7 and 13 mL/h, while equine anaesthesia exhibited a higher rate, 41.2 mL/h. Corresponding to 7.36 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in total environmental emissions or between 2.4 and 31.3 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent per hour. Comparison to human anaesthesia settings showed comparable consumption rates to small animals, suggesting shared environmental implications, albeit on a smaller scale. This research highlights the importance of continued evaluation of veterinary anaesthesia practices to balance patient safety with environmental stewardship; potential mitigation strategies are explored and discussed.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Hospitals, Animal , Hospitals, Teaching , Animals , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Horses , Switzerland , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Humans , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Greenhouse Gases/analysis , Anesthesia, Inhalation/veterinaryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of propofol, ketamine-propofol and isoflurane, at similar anesthetic depth, on cardiopulmonary variables in unpremedictated chickens. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover experimental trial. ANIMALS: A total of 10 male Leghorn domestic chickens, aged 3 months and body mass 1.4-2.0 kg. METHODS: Birds were randomly assigned to each of three anesthetic protocols, 7 days apart: intravenous propofol, intravenous ketamine-propofol or isoflurane. Anesthesia was induced (indicated by loss of righting reflex and tracheal intubation) and maintained with propofol (10 mg kg-1 minute-1, then 1.1 mg kg-1 minute-1), ketamine-propofol (5 mg mL-1 ketamine and 5 mg mL-1 propofol combined; 10 mg kg-1 minute-1, then 1.1 mg kg-1 minute-1) or isoflurane [5% vaporizer setting initially, then end-tidal concentration (Fe'Iso) of 2%] for 65 minutes. Anesthesia was maintained at a similar anesthetic depth based upon positive or negative responses to toe pinch. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR), noninvasive arterial blood pressure and arterial blood gases were measured during anesthesia. Propofol or ketamine-propofol infusion rates and Fe'Iso required to prevent movement in response to a noxious stimulus and recovery times were recorded. RESULTS: Anesthesia induction dose was 9.0 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD) and 12.2 ± 0.3 mg kg-1 for propofol and ketamine-propofol, respectively. Propofol and ketamine-propofol infusion rates and Fe'Iso required to prevent movement in response to the noxious stimulus were 0.88 ± 0.14 mg kg-1 minute-1, 0.92 ± 0.14 mg kg-1 minute-1 and 1.45 ± 0.28%, respectively. Cardiopulmonary variables remained clinically acceptable, but ketamine-propofol was associated with a significantly higher HR (p = 0.0001) and lower fR (p = 0.0001). Time to extubation did not differ among treatments. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cardiovascular and respiratory variables were maintained within normal ranges in all treatments. Coadministration of ketamine with propofol significantly reduced the induction and maintenance dose of propofol.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Intravenous , Chickens , Heart Rate , Isoflurane , Ketamine , Propofol , Animals , Propofol/pharmacology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Ketamine/pharmacology , Isoflurane/administration & dosage , Isoflurane/pharmacology , Male , Heart Rate/drug effects , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Respiratory Rate/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Post-ischemia reperfusion can lead to oxidative stress and an increase in oxidative markers. Employing preventive strategies and antioxidant agents may help mitigate ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). The use of a tourniquet in extremity surgery has been associated with IRI. This study aims to investigate the impact of three different approaches- brachial plexus block, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), and inhalation anesthesia-on IRI during upper extremity surgery using a tourniquet. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 45 with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II scores were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A received an axillary block with bupivacaine; Group I underwent inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane; and Group T received TIVA with propofol and remifentanil infusion. Blood samples were collected to measure glucose, lactate, total anti-oxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), and ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) levels at various time points: before anesthesia (t1), 1 minute before tourniquet release (t2), 20 minutes after tourniquet release (t3), and 4 hours after tourniquet release (t4). RESULTS: In Group I, lactate levels at t3, and glucose levels at t2 and t3, were higher compared to the other groups. Group A exhibited lower IMA levels at t2, t3, and t4 than the other groups. Additionally, Group I had lower IMA levels at t2, t3, and t4 compared to Group T. TAS levels were higher in Group I at t2, t3, and t4 compared to the other groups. TOS levels at t2 and t3 were lower in Group A than in Group I. CONCLUSION: Axillary anesthesia results in a sympathetic block, promoting better perfusion of the upper extremity. This study demonstrated lower levels of oxidative stress markers with axillary plexus block. Therefore, these results suggest that the axillary block has the potential to mitigate IRI.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Intravenous , Brachial Plexus Block , Propofol , Reperfusion Injury , Sevoflurane , Tourniquets , Upper Extremity , Humans , Reperfusion Injury/prevention & control , Reperfusion Injury/etiology , Adult , Male , Female , Anesthesia, Intravenous/methods , Brachial Plexus Block/methods , Middle Aged , Upper Extremity/blood supply , Upper Extremity/surgery , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Propofol/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Remifentanil/administration & dosage , Methyl Ethers/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Piperidines/administration & dosageABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of delirium and early (at 1 week) postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) between propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and volatile anesthesia with sevoflurane in adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized single-blinded study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a single institution, the Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, a tertiary care institution and university-level teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two patients undergoing elective CABG under CPB participated in this study. INTERVENTIONS: This study was conducted on 72 adult patients (>18 years) undergoing elective CABG under CPB who were randomized to receive propofol or sevoflurane. Anesthetic depth was monitored to maintain the bispectral index between 40 and 60. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Early POCD was diagnosed when there was a reduction of >2 points in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score compared to baseline. Cerebral oximetry changes using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), atheroma grades, and intraoperative variables were compared between the 2 groups. MEASUREMENTS & MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were randomized to receive propofol (n = 36) or sevoflurane (n = 36). The mean patient age was 59.4 ± 8.6 years. The baseline and intraoperative variables, including atheroma grades, NIRS values, hemoglobin, glycemic control, and oxygenation, were comparable in the 2 groups. Fifteen patients (21.7%) patients developed delirium, and 31 patients (44.9%) had early POCD. The incidence of delirium was higher with sevoflurane (n = 12; 34.2%) compared to propofol (n = 3; 8.8%) (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.62; p = 0.027)*. POCD was higher with sevoflurane (n = 20; 57.1%) compared to propofol (n = 11; 32.3%) (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.01-2.62; p = 0.038)*. In patients aged >65 years, delirium was higher with sevoflurane (7/11; 63.6%) compared to propofol (1/7; 14.2%) (p = 0.03)*. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol-based TIVA was associated with a lower incidence of delirium and POCD compared to sevoflurane in this cohort of patients undergoing CABG under CPB. Large-scale, multicenter randomized trials with longer follow-up are needed to substantiate the clinical relevance of this observation.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Intravenous , Anesthetics, Inhalation , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Coronary Artery Bypass , Propofol , Sevoflurane , Humans , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/adverse effects , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Prospective Studies , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Intravenous/methods , Anesthesia, Intravenous/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Aged , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/etiology , Anesthesia, Inhalation/methods , Anesthesia, Inhalation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) are widely used to mitigate the risk of nerve injury resulting from surgical manipulation. Infants are more susceptible to anaesthetics that suppress MEP because of the immaturity of their nervous structures. Current evidence of the impact of the interaction between a small dose of sevoflurane and propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) on MEP in infants is controversial. This current study aims to evaluate the impact of the coadministration of low-dose sevoflurane with propofol-based TIVA on MEP in infants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled study will be conducted at a single tertiary care children's hospital in Japan between July 2024 and June 2029. Children between 35 and 87 weeks of postconceptual age undergoing spinal surgery requiring MEP under general anaesthesia will be enrolled in this study. The participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: propofol+remifentanil with (intervention group) or without (control group) low-dose sevoflurane (0.10-0.15 age-adjusted minimum alveolar concentration). MEP top-to-bottom amplitudes will be measured at two chronological points: T1 (first transcranial MEP (TcMEP) recording), T2 (second TcMEP recording) in the same patient. The primary and secondary endpoints will be a reduction in MEP amplitudes (T1-T2) in the right upper and lower extremities between the control and intervention groups, respectively. The sample size was calculated to be a total of 40 based on the preliminary data of 10 infants, which showed a 35% reduction in mean values of MEP amplitudes in the right adductor muscle (SD=31) with a 10% assumed dropout rate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center (2022058). The results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal at the relevant academic conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT1041230094.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Intravenous , Evoked Potentials, Motor , Propofol , Sevoflurane , Humans , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/pharmacology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/pharmacology , Infant , Evoked Potentials, Motor/drug effects , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Remifentanil/administration & dosage , Remifentanil/pharmacology , JapanABSTRACT
AIMS: To describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients with myelopathy and neuropathy due to recreationally inhaled nitrous oxide. METHODS: We identified patients presenting with nitrous oxide-associated myelopathy from an electronic database of all discharges in a large tertiary hospital between 2016 and 2023. Demographics, clinical features and the results of investigations were recorded. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) at least 3 months after hospital discharge where available. RESULTS: There were 12 patients identified, six women, mean (SD) age 27.5 (5.1) years, range 19-47 years. The most common symptoms were numbness, weakness and mental state changes. Four patients used large amounts of inhaled nitrous oxide and also took over-the-counter vitamin B12 supplements. The median (range) hospital length of stay was 8.5 (2-56) days. Functional independence at last assessment (median [range] of 3 [1-34] months after discharge) was achieved in nine of the patients, with three requiring ongoing support for activities of daily living (mRS ≥3). CONCLUSION: Nitrous oxide abuse and its neurological complications are an important public health issue. Clinicians should be aware that some patients who use large amounts of nitrous oxide may self-supplement vitamin B12.
Subject(s)
Nitrous Oxide , Spinal Cord Diseases , Humans , Nitrous Oxide/adverse effects , Nitrous Oxide/administration & dosage , Female , Adult , Male , Middle Aged , Spinal Cord Diseases/chemically induced , Young Adult , Vitamin B 12/administration & dosage , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Climate change represents an urgent global threat. Without action, rising temperatures resulting from human activity will increasingly affect our health and wellbeing through changing patterns of disease, extreme weather events and availability of resources. Expedient decarbonisation of the UK economy is an ambitious goal to which we must all contribute.The NHS aims to be the world's first net-zero health service and reach carbon-neutral status by 2040. Dental services are particularly resource-intensive. Some dental anxiety management techniques have a disproportionately high impact on the environment relative to their usage. Inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide is one such example.Nitrous oxide is a greenhouse gas almost 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide, but its utility to facilitate dental treatment for anxious and vulnerable patients is well-documented. This paper balances the health utility with environmental and social harm of continuing to use nitrous oxide and suggests evidence-based methods we can apply to limit the environmental impact of sedation services.
Subject(s)
Climate Change , Conscious Sedation , Dental Anxiety , Nitrous Oxide , Humans , Dental Anxiety/prevention & control , Conscious Sedation/methods , Nitrous Oxide/administration & dosage , Nitrous Oxide/therapeutic use , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , United Kingdom , Anesthesia, Dental/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication that is characterized by acute onset of impaired cognitive function and is associated with an increased mortality, a prolonged duration of hospital stay, and additional healthcare expenditures. The incidence of POD in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colectomy ranges from 8 to 54%. Xenon has been shown to provide neuroprotection in various neural injury models, but the clinical researches assessing the preventive effect of xenon inhalation on the occurrence of POD obtained controversial findings. This study aims to investigate the effects of a short xenon inhalation on the occurrence of POD in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colectomy. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial and 132 patients aged 65-80 years and scheduled for laparoscopic radical colectomy will be enrolled. The participants will be randomly assigned to either the control group or the xenon group (n = 66 in each group). The primary outcome will be the incidence of POD in the first 5 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include the subtype, severity, and duration of POD, postoperative pain score, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PQSI), perioperative non-delirium complications, and economic parameters. Additionally, the study will investigate the activation of microglial cells, expression of inflammatory factors in colon tissues, plasma inflammatory factors, and neurochemical markers. DISCUSSION: Elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colectomy are at a high risk of POD, with delayed postoperative recovery and increased healthcare costs. The primary objective of this study is to determine the preventive effect of a short xenon inhalation on the occurrence of POD in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300076666. Registered on October 16, 2023, http://www.chictr.org.cn .
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Colectomy , Laparoscopy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Xenon , Humans , Xenon/administration & dosage , Aged , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Colectomy/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Female , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Delirium/prevention & control , Delirium/etiology , Delirium/epidemiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Administration, Inhalation , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pharmacological methods, specifically sedatives, have gained popularity in managing the behavior of children during dental appointments. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare 1 m/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine, 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam, and nitrous oxide in evaluating the level of sedation, behavior of the child, onset of sedation, physiologic signs, and adverse effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-over trial, 15 children aged 6-8 years were randomized to receive intranasal atomized dexmedetomidine, intranasal atomized midazolam, and inhalation nitrous oxide at three separate visits. After administering the sedative agent, a single pulpectomy was performed during each appointment, and the outcomes were recorded. The washout period between each visit was 1 week. RESULTS: All three sedative agents were equally effective in controlling overall behavior. Dexmedetomidine showed lower sedation level scores (agitated; score 9) than the other groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the onset of sedation, with dexmedetomidine having the longest onset of 36.2 ± 9.47 min. Coughing and sneezing were predominantly observed after administration of intranasal midazolam. Oxygen saturation levels were statistically lower in the intranasal midazolam group during local anesthesia administration and post-treatment. CONCLUSION: 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam is as effective as nitrous oxide sedation for controlling behavior and providing adequate sedation in pediatric dental patients. However, 1 m/kg dexmedetomidine did not provide the same level of sedation and had a significantly longer onset. 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam is an effective alternative to nitrous oxide sedation in anxious children.
Subject(s)
Administration, Intranasal , Conscious Sedation , Cross-Over Studies , Dental Anxiety , Dexmedetomidine , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Midazolam , Nitrous Oxide , Humans , Nitrous Oxide/administration & dosage , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Child , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Conscious Sedation/methods , Male , Female , Dental Anxiety/prevention & control , Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Dental Care for Children/methods , Child Behavior/drug effects , Pulpectomy/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Postoperative respiratory adverse events are the most common perioperative complications in pediatric anesthesia, particularly prevalent in children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, with an incidence rate as high as 50%. The choice of anesthetic induction regimen directly influences the incidence of respiratory adverse events during the induction period. However, this effect seems to have minimal impact on postoperative outcomes. The occurrence rate of postoperative respiratory adverse events is likely more closely associated with the anesthetic maintenance phase, yet this relationship remains uncertain at present. METHODS: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of different anesthetic maintenance regimens on postoperative respiratory adverse events in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. The AmPRAEC study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. A total of 717 pediatric patients were recruited from 12 medical centers and randomly assigned to three groups: group A (intravenous maintenance group, receiving propofol infusion); group B (intravenous-inhalational combination group, maintained with 1% sevoflurane combined with propofol); and group C (inhalational maintenance group, maintained with 2-3% sevoflurane inhalation). The primary outcome measure was the incidence rate of postoperative respiratory adverse events. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial aims to elucidate the impact of various anesthetic maintenance regimens on postoperative respiratory adverse events in pediatric patients. The outcomes of this study are anticipated to facilitate anesthesiologists in devising more comprehensive perioperative management strategies, enhancing comfort, and improving the clinical outcomes for this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) ChiCTR2300074803. Registered on August 16, 2023.
Subject(s)
Adenoidectomy , Postoperative Complications , Propofol , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sevoflurane , Tonsillectomy , Humans , Tonsillectomy/adverse effects , Adenoidectomy/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Child , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/adverse effects , Male , Female , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , China/epidemiology , Time Factors , AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Flash visual evoked potentials (FVEPs) are a reliable method for protecting visual function during spine surgery in prone position. However, the popularization and application of FVEPs remain limited due to the unclear influence of various anesthetics on FVEPs. Exploring the effects of anesthetic drugs on FVEP and establishing appropriate anesthesia maintenance methods are particularly important for promoting and applying FVEP. According to the conventional concept, inhaled narcotic drugs significantly affect the success of FVEP monitoring, FVEP extraction, and interpretation. Nonetheless, our previous study demonstrated that sevoflurane-propofol balanced anesthesia was a practicable regimen for FVEPs. Desflurane is widely used in general anesthesia for its rapid recovery properties. As the effect of desflurane on FVEP remains unclear, this trial will investigate the effect of different inhaled concentrations of desflurane anesthesia on amplitude of FVEPs during spine surgery, aiming to identify more feasible anesthesia schemes for the clinical application of FVEP. METHODS/ DESIGN: A total of 70 patients undergoing elective spinal surgery will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled, open-label, patient-assessor-blinded, superiority trial and randomly assigned to the low inhaled concentration of desflurane group (LD group) maintained with desflurane-propofolremifentanil-balanced anesthesia or high inhaled concentration of desflurane group (HD group) maintained with desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia maintenance group at a ratio of 1:1. All patients will be monitored for intraoperative FVEPs, and the baseline will be measured half an hour after induction under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). After that, patients will receive 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of desflurane combined with propofol and remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance in the LD group, while 0.7-1.0 MAC of desflurane and remifentanil will be maintained in the HD group. The primary outcome is the N75-P100 amplitude 1 h after the induction of anesthesia. We intend to use the dual measure evaluation, dual data entry, and statistical analysis by double trained assessors to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the results. DISCUSSION: This randomized controlled trial aims to explore the superiority effect of low inhaled concentration of desflurane combined with propofolremifentanil-balanced anesthesia versus high inhaled concentration of desflurane combined with remifentanil anesthesia on amplitude of FVEPs. The study is meant to be published in a peer-reviewed journal and might guide the anesthetic regimen for FVEPs. The conclusion is expected to provide high-quality evidence for the effect of desflurane on FVEPs and aim to explore more feasible anesthesia schemes for the clinical application of FVEPs and visual function protection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on July 15, 2022. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT05465330.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Desflurane , Evoked Potentials, Visual , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Remifentanil , Spine , Humans , Desflurane/administration & dosage , Evoked Potentials, Visual/drug effects , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Spine/surgery , Middle Aged , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/methods , Adult , Male , Remifentanil/administration & dosage , Female , Propofol/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Aged , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Time Factors , Orthopedic Procedures , Photic StimulationABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The healthcare sector has a substantial environmental footprint, and the delivery of anesthesia contributes significantly. Inhaled anesthetics themselves are potent greenhouse gases, unused intravenous medication exert toxic effects on the environment, and the increasing reliance on single-use devices has led to an ever-growing amount of solid waste produced in operating rooms. This review discusses many of these environmental impacts and suggests practices to mitigate the environmental footprint of anesthetic practice. RECENT FINDINGS: The choice of anesthesia maintenance has significant environmental implications, with nitrous oxide and desflurane having the highest carbon footprint of all anesthetic agents. Using low fresh gas flows and supplementing or replacing inhalational agents with propofol leads to a significant reduction in emissions. Many intravenous anesthetic agents pose a risk of environmental toxicity, and efforts should be made to decrease medication waste and ensure appropriate disposal of unused medications to minimize their environmental impacts. Additionally, consideration should be given to replacing single-use devices in the operating rooms with reusable alternatives that are often both environmentally and economically superior. And solid waste generated in the operating room should be segregated thoughtfully, as processing regulated medical waste is a highly energy-intensive process. SUMMARY: Significant opportunities exist to improve the environmental footprint of anesthesia practice, and with the rapidly worsening climate crisis, the importance of implementing changes is greater than ever.
Subject(s)
Operating Rooms , Humans , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Carbon Footprint , Medical Waste Disposal/methods , Medical Waste/adverse effects , Medical Waste/prevention & control , Environment , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthesia/methods , Greenhouse Gases/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a serious surgical complication. We assessed the different POCD incidences between anesthesia using sevoflurane and sevoflurane combined with dexmedetomidine, with propofol-based sedation in elderly patients who underwent a thoracic surgical procedure. METHODS: A total of 90 patients aged 65 to 80 years old who underwent a thoracic surgical procedure at our hospital and 15 nonsurgical participants as controls, were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided in a randomized 1:1:1 ratio into 3 groups. All participants were randomized into a trial with three anesthesia groups (P, PS, PSD) or a control group (C) of healthy matches. All trial groups received distinct anesthetic combinations during surgery, while controls mirrored patient criteria.Group P (propofol and remifentanil were maintained during the surgery), Group PS (propofol, remifentanil, and sevoflurane were maintained during the surgery), and Group PSD (propofol, remifentanil, sevoflurane, and dexmedetomidine were maintained during the surgery).All participants were rated using a series of cognitive assessment scales before and three days after surgery. All participants were interviewed over the telephone, 7 days, 30 days, and 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: POCD incidences in the PSD (combined anesthetization with propofol, sevoflurane, and dexmedetomidine) group was significantly lower than that in the PS (combined anesthetization with propofol and sevoflurane) group, 1 day post-surgery (10.0% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.008), and the results were consistent at 3 days post-surgery. When the patients were assessed 7 days, 30 days, and 90 days postoperatively, there was no significant difference in POCD incidence among the three groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of POCD one day after surgery showed that education level was negatively correlated with incidence of POCD (P = 0.018) and single lung ventilation time was positively correlated with incidence of POCD (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: For elderly patients who underwent a thoracic surgical procedure, dexmedetomidine sedation shows an obvious advantage on improving short-term POCD incidence, which is caused by sevoflurane.