ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has developed a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Primary studies such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are cited as evidence for the guidelines. Given the influence that these trials have on patient care, adherence to standardized protocols for conducting and reporting RCTs is essential. PURPOSE: To evaluate the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Extension for Harms-related reporting of RCTs cited as supporting evidence for the AAOS CPG on the management of ACL tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The reference section of the AAOS guideline for ACL tears was first screened for RCTs cited in the CPG. Next, each RCT was evaluated for adherence to the CONSORT Extension for Harms checklist. Both identification of RCTs and assessment of adherence were performed in a masked and duplicate process. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize adherence to CONSORT Extension for Harms items. A Pearson correlation test was conducted to assess the relationship between the year of publication and adherence to CONSORT harms reporting. RESULTS: The sample included 113 RCTs, of which 16 (14.2%) were published before the CONSORT Extension for Harms was implemented in 2004. Sample sizes ranged from 24 to 4564 participants, with a mean of 228. None of the included RCTs included all 18 items in the CONSORT Extension for Harms checklist. The mean number of checklist items reported was 4 (of 18; 22.2%). A moderate, positive, and statistically significant correlation was found between the RCT publication year and the adherence with reporting of the CONSORT Extension for Harms (t111 = 3.54; P < .001) (r = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.47). CONCLUSION: Harms were infrequently reported in RCTs cited as supporting evidence in the AAOS CPG for the management of ACL tears. One encouraging finding was the positive correlation between the year when RCTs were published and how well they adhered to reporting harms. Efforts to improve adverse event reporting are warranted, as RCTs are commonly used to make clinical decisions in orthopaedic surgery.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Guideline Adherence , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Checklist , Orthopedics/standardsABSTRACT
The exploration of underlying biological risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury has generated a substantial body of literature describing the role of bony morphology of the knee. Morphological risk factors, such as poor tibiofemoral joint congruity, a narrow femoral intercondylar notch, and an increased posterior tibial slope (PTS), have been implicated in contributing to knee instability and biomechanical abnormalities. Additionally, investigations into sex-specific differences in bony morphology have unveiled distinct risk profiles for males and females. In light of these findings, surgical considerations for individuals with high-risk bony morphology have been developed. Procedures like anterior closing wedge high tibial osteotomy, aiming to address increased PTS, and lateral extra-articular tenodesis for patients with specific risk factors, have been established. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current evidence describing the relationship between bony morphology and ACL injury. Moreover, this review aims to discuss the surgical management and outcomes concerning patients exhibiting high-risk anatomic features.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Knee Joint , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Risk Factors , Knee Joint/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Tibia/surgery , Biomechanical Phenomena , Osteotomy/methods , Osteotomy/adverse effects , Female , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Male , Joint Instability/surgery , Femur/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is influenced by factors such as meniscal tears and tibial plateau slope. Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has reduced failure rates; however, its efficacy in high-risk patients remains unclear. This study hypothesized that combined ACL and ALL reconstruction would yield similar clinical outcomes in patients with varying risks of ACL failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 76 patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction between June 2018 and June 2021 were included. The medial tibial slope (MTS), lateral tibial slope (LTS), and anterior tibial translation (ATT) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiography of the knee joint. The meniscal lesions were assessed during surgery. Preoperative clinical assessments and final follow-up were conducted using patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Tegner Activity scale. PROMs were collected at least two years postoperatively. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 32.5 ± 7.4 months. There were no significant differences in postoperative IKDC score, Lysholm score, or Tegner activity score between patients with or without medial meniscus injury (p = 0.155, 0.914, and 0.042, respectively), with or without lateral meniscus injury (p = 0.737, 0.569, and 0.942, respectively), medial tibial slope > 12° or ≤ 12° (p = 0.290, 0.496, and 0.988, respectively), or lateral tibial slope > 7.4° or ≤ 7.4° (p = 0.213, 0.625, and 0.922, respectively). No significant correlations were found between anterior tibial translation and postoperative IKDC (R = -0.058, p = 0.365), Lysholm (R = -0.017, p = 0.459), or Tegner activity scores (R = -0.147, p = 0.189). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction provides reliable and comparable clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk factors for ACL graft failure, such as increased tibial slope or meniscal injury. Our results suggest that the indications for ALL reconstruction may be expanded to include patients with a high tibial slope or meniscal injury, because these factors have been shown to contribute to increased rotational instability and high rates of ACL graft failure. Future prospective randomized controlled trials with large patient cohorts and long follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings and establish clear guidelines for patient selection and surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Female , Male , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Risk Factors , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Knee Joint/surgery , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/surgery , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Treatment Failure , Follow-Up Studies , Tibia/surgery , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Magnetic Resonance ImagingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical efficacy of double beam double tunnel enhanced reconstruction technique in the treatment of knee anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) training injuries. METHODS: Twenty-nine cases of ACL injury of knee joint from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All the cases were underwent ligament reconstruction surgery. Cases were grouped by surgical technique:there were 14 patients in conventional reconstruction group, including 13 males and 1 female, aged from 22 to 31 years old with an average of (27.07±7.28) years old, autogenous hamstring tendon was used for ligament reconstruction. There were 15 patients in the enhanced reconstruction group, including 13 males and 2 females, aged from 25 to 34 years old with an average of (29.06±4.23) years old, double tunnel ligament reconstruction, the autogenous hamstring muscle was used as the anteromedial bundle, and the posterolateral bundle was replaced by a high-strength line. The difference between knee tibial anterior distance, Lysholm score, International Knee Literature Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Tegner motor level score and visual analog scale (VAS) at 6th and 12th months after the surgery, limb symmetry index (LSI) were recorded at the last follow-up and surgery-related adverse effects during follow-up. RESULTS: All patients were followed up, ranged from 13 to 15 months with an average of (13.7±0.8) months. There were no serious adverse reactions related to surgery during the period. There was no statistical difference between the preoperative general data and the observation index of the two groups (P>0.05). The difference in tibial anterior distance at 6 and 12 months in the enhanced reconstruction group (1.45±0.62) mm and (1.74±0.78) mm which were lower those that in the conventional reconstruction group (2.42±0.60) mm and (2.51±0.63) mm(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative Lysholm score, Tegner motor level score, IKDC score, VAS, and limb symmetry index at the last follow-up(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The enhanced reconstruction technique can more effectively maintain the stability of the knee joint and has no significant effect on the postoperative knee joint function compared with the traditional ligament reconstruction technique. The short-term curative effect is satisfactory, and it is suitable for the group with high sports demand.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic measurement of intra-articular graft length in the application of total internal reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament(ACL). METHODS: The 60 patients with ACL injury treated between January 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 37 males and 23 females, aged from 22 to 44 years. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into two groups:conventional surgery group (conventional group) and pull-line measurement group (measurement group), with 30 cases in each group. In the conventional group, there were 20 males and 10 females, with an average age of (30.00±3.95) years old;the body mass index (BMI) was (22.58±1.41) kg·m-2;there were 9 cases on the left side and 21 cases on the right side;the time from injury to operation was (3. 00±1.35) days. In the measurement group, there were 17 males and 13 females, with an average of(32.00±4.29) years;BMI was (23.29±1.39) kg·m-2;there were 12 cases on the left side and 18 cases on the right side;the time from injury to operation was (3.00±1.27) days. The clinical data of the patients before surgery, 6 months after surgery and 12 months after surgery were collected and recorded. The clinical efficacy of the two methods was compared in terms of postoperative VAS, KOOS, Lysholm score, IKDC score, knee stability (Lachman test, anterior drawer test and axial shift test), the degree of widening of bone tunnel diameter measured by CT at different stages of the postoperative period and MRI scoring system. RESULTS: At 12 months after surgery, the VAS of the measurement group was lower than that of the conventional group(P<0.001). At 12 months after surgery, KOOS scores in the measurement group were higher than those in the conventional group, and there were statistically significant differences in all scores except symptom scores (P<0.05). Six months after operation, Lysholm total score and IKDC total score in the measurement group were higher than those in the conventional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). At 12 months after surgery, knee stability tests were performed, and the differences between the Lachman test, anterior drawer test and axial shift test measurement group and the conventional group were not statistically significant (P>0.05). However, overall knee instability analysis showed that the knee stability of the measurement group was better than that of the control group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P=0.038). The imaging assessment of patients in both groups at 6 months after surgery showed that the widening of tendon tunnel diameter in both femur and tibia was reduced in the measurement group compared with the conventional group after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);MRI scores were higher in all patients in the measurement group those in the conventional group, at 6 months and 12 months agter surgery(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic measurement of intra-articular cavity graft length in total internal technique for ACL reconstruction, high tendon utilization, good stability, the knee joint function has recovered satisfactorily within one year, and the therapeutic effect is affirmed.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Arthroscopy/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgeryABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of I.D.E.A.L technique and transtibial (TT) technique in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: A clinical data of 60 patients with ACL injury, who were admitted and met the selection criteria between January 2020 and September 2022, was retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with autologous tendon. During operation, the femoral tunnel was prepared by using I.D.E.A.L technique in 30 cases (I.D.E.A.L group) and using TT technique in 30 cases (TT group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index, cause of injury, injured side, interval from injury to operation, constituent ratio of combined cartilage and meniscus injury, and preoperative Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior tibial translation difference, and Blumensaat angle between the two groups ( P>0.05). The length of hospital stay and the occurrence of early and late complications were recorded. During follow-up, the Lysholm score, IKDC score, and VAS score were used to evaluate knee joint function and pain degree, and the anterior tibial translation difference was measured. MRI reexamination was performed to observe the healing of the graft, and the signal to noise quotient (SNQ) values of the femoral end, middle section, and tibial end of the graft, as well as the Blumensaat angle of the knee joint were measured. The differences in tibial anterior translation difference and Blumensaat angle before and after operation (change values) were calculated and compared between the two groups. Results: The incisions in both groups healed by first intention after operation, and there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 14.9 months. The Lysholm score and IKDC score of the knee joint in both groups after operation increased when compared with those before operation, and the VAS score decreased. Compared to preoperative scores, except for the VAS score of the TT group at 1 week after operation ( P>0.05), there were significant differences in all scores at different time points postoperatively in the two groups ( P<0.05). The above scores in both groups showed a further improvement trend with the prolongation of time after operation. There were significant differences in Lysholm score and VAS score among 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation in the two groups ( P<0.05). The IKDC score of both groups at 1 month after operation was significantly different from that at 1 week after operation ( P<0.05). At 1 week after operation, the Lysholm score and IKDC score in the I.D.E.A.L group were significantly higher than those in the TT group ( P<0.05), and the VAS score was significantly lower ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, the anterior tibial translation differences in both groups were significantly lower than those before operation ( P<0.05); and the change value in the I.D.E.A.L group was significantly higher than that in the TT group ( P<0.05). The incidences of early and late complications in the I.D.E.A.L group were significantly lower than those in the TT group ( P<0.05). At 12 months after operation, MRI examination showed that the grafts of the knee joint in both groups survived well, and the Blumensaat angles of both groups were significantly smaller than those before operation ( P<0.05). The change value of the Blumensaat angle in the I.D.E.A.L group was significantly higher than that in the TT group ( P<0.05). The SNQ values of the femoral end, middle section, and tibial end of the graft in the I.D.E.A.L group were significantly higher than those in the TT group ( P<0.05). Conclusion: The early effectiveness of ACL reconstruction by using the I.D.E.A.L technique is better, the knee joint is more stable, and the incidence of postoperative complication is lower. However, the maturity of the graft after reconstruction using the TT technique is higher.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Arthroscopy , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Arthroscopy/methods , Tibia/surgery , Transplantation, Autologous , Female , Male , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Femur/surgery , Tendons/transplantation , Knee Joint/surgery , AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament injury and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are risk factors for symptomatic posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). After ACLR, individuals demonstrate altered joint tissue metabolism indicative of increased inflammation and cartilage breakdown. Serum biomarker changes have been associated with tibiofemoral cartilage composition indicative of worse knee joint health but not with PTOA-related symptoms. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine associations between changes in serum biomarker profiles from the preoperative sample collection to 6 months after ACLR and clinically relevant knee PTOA symptoms at 12 months after ACLR. It was hypothesized that increases in biomarkers of inflammation, cartilage metabolism, and cartilage degradation would be associated with clinically relevant PTOA symptoms after ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Individuals undergoing primary ACLR were included (N = 30). Serum samples collected preoperatively and 6 months after ACLR were processed to measure markers indicative of changes in inflammation (ie, monocyte chemoattract protein 1 [MCP-1]) and cartilage breakdown (ie, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein [COMP], matrix metalloproteinase 3, ratio of type II collagen breakdown to type II collagen synthesis). Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score surveys were completed at 12 months after ACLR and used to identify participants with and without clinically relevant PTOA-related symptoms. K-means cluster analyses were used to determine serum biomarker profiles. One-way analyses of variance and logistic regressions were used to assess differences in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale scores and clinically relevant PTOA-related symptoms between biomarker profiles. RESULTS: Two profiles were identified and characterized based on decreases (profile 1: 67% female; age, 21.4 ± 5.1 years; body mass index, 24.4 ± 2.4) and increases (profile 2: 33% female; age, 21.3 ± 3.2 years; body mass index, 23.4 ± 2.6) in sMCP-1 and sCOMP preoperatively to 6 months after ACLR. Participants with profile 2 did not demonstrate differences in knee pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports function, or quality of life at 12 months after ACLR compared to those with profile 1 (P = .56-.81; η2 = 0.002-0.012). No statistically significant associations were noted between biomarker profiles and clinically relevant PTOA-related symptoms (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.23-6.33). CONCLUSION: Serum biomarker changes in MCP-1 and sCOMP within the first 6 months after ACLR were not associated with clinically relevant PTOA-related symptoms.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Biomarkers , Cartilage, Articular , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Male , Case-Control Studies , Adult , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/blood , Cartilage, Articular/metabolism , Young Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/complications , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/blood , Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein/blood , Chemokine CCL2/blood , Inflammation/blood , Matrix Metalloproteinase 3/blood , Knee Joint/surgery , Adolescent , Knee Injuries/surgery , Knee Injuries/blood , Knee Injuries/complications , Collagen Type II/bloodABSTRACT
Intraligamentous injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and meniscus injuries are rare in children and adolescents and often occur as a result of sports injuries. Clinically, they usually present as a hemarthrosis. The diagnosis of choice is the MRI examination. Surgical treatment of intraligamentary ACL injuries using the transphyseal technique is now also the gold standard treatment for children and adolescents, leg axis and length checks are necessary after surgery until growth is complete. Meniscus injuries are also addressed surgically. Postoperative follow-up treatment and rehabilitation are particularly important in order to prevent reinjury. The disc meniscus is a special entity and is also treated surgically if it is symptomatic. Isolated collateral ligament and posterior cruciate ligament ruptures are rarities.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Knee Injuries , Tibial Meniscus Injuries , Humans , Child , Knee Injuries/surgery , Knee Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/surgery , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Menisci, Tibial/surgery , Menisci, Tibial/diagnostic imaging , Menisci, Tibial/pathology , Female , MaleABSTRACT
The purpose of this work was to provide a simple method to determine reactive strength during the 6-meter timed hop test (6mTH) and evaluate its association with isokinetic peak torque in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Twenty-nine ACLR patients who were at least four months from surgery were included in this analysis. Participants were brought into the laboratory on one occasion to complete functional testing. Quadriceps and hamstring isokinetic testing was completed bilaterally at 60, 180, and 300 degâs-1, using extension peak torque from each speed as the outcome measure. The 6mTH was completed bilaterally using a marker-based motion capture system, and reactive strength ratio (RSR) was calculated from the vertical velocity of the pelvis during the test. An adjustment in RSR was made using the velocity of the 6mTH test to account for different strategies employed across participants. Repeated measures correlations were used to determine associations among isokinetic and hop testing variables. A two-way mixed analysis of variance was used to determine differences in isokinetic and hop testing variables between operated and non-operated legs and across male and female participants. Moderate positive associations were found between RSR (and adjusted RSR) and isokinetic peak torque at all speeds (r = .527 to .577). Mean comparisons showed significant main effects for leg and sex. Patients showed significant deficits in their operated versus non-operated legs in all isokinetic and hop testing variables, yet only isokinetic peak torque and timed hop time showed significant differences across male and female groups. Preliminary results are promising but further development is needed to validate other accessible technologies available to calculate reactive strength during functional testing after ACLR. Pending these developments, the effects of movement strategies, demographics, and levels of participation on RSR can then be explored to translate this simple method to clinical environments.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Muscle Strength , Torque , Humans , Male , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Female , Adult , Muscle Strength/physiology , Young Adult , Exercise Test/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology , Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , Quadriceps Muscle/physiopathology , Physical Functional Performance , Adolescent , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/physiopathology , Hamstring Muscles/physiopathology , Hamstring Muscles/physiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Reaching the Patient-Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) threshold for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) has previously been reported to successfully identify individuals experiencing clinical success after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Thus, the objectives of this study were to examine and compare the percentages of patients meeting PASS thresholds for the different KOOS subscales 1 year postoperatively after primary ACLR compared with revision ACLR (rACLR) and multiply revised ACLR (mrACLR), and second, to examine the predictors for reaching PASS for KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) and Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) after mrACLR. DESIGN: Prospective observational registry study. SETTING: The data used in this study was obtained from the Swedish National Ligament Registry and collected between 2005 and 2020. PARTICIPANTS: The study sample was divided into three different groups: (1) primary ACLR, (2) rACLR and (3) mrACLR. Data on patient demographic, injury and surgical characteristics were obtained as well as mean 1-year postoperative scores for KOOS subscales and the per cent of patients meeting PASS for each subscale. Additionally, the predictors of reaching PASS for KOOS Sport/Rec, and QoL subscales were evaluated in patients undergoing mrACLR. RESULTS: Of the 22 928 patients included in the study, 1144 underwent rACLR and 36 underwent mrACLR. Across all KOOS subscales, the percentage of patients meeting PASS thresholds was statistically lower for rACLR compared with primary ACLR (KOOS Symptoms 22.5% vs 32.9%, KOOS Pain 84.9% vs 92.9%, KOOS Activities of Daily Living 23.5% vs 31.4%, KOOS Sport/Rec 26.3% vs 45.6%, KOOS QoL 26.9% vs 51.4%). Percentages of patients reaching PASS thresholds for all KOOS subscales were comparable between patients undergoing rACLR versus mrACLR. No predictive factors were found to be associated with reaching PASS for KOOS QoL and KOOS Sport/Rec 1 year postoperatively after mrACLR. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing ACLR in the revision setting had lower rates of reaching acceptable symptom states for functional knee outcomes than those undergoing primary ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective observational registry study, level of evidence II.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Quality of Life , Registries , Reoperation , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Prospective Studies , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Sweden , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Recovery of FunctionABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Research surrounding the biomechanics and video analysis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries at the professional level has emerged in recent years as a tool to screen athletes for potential biomechanical deficits. The purpose of this study was to analyze and discuss the most common mechanism, body position, and activity at the time of ACL injury among NBA players. METHODS: Anterior cruciate ligament injuries over 10 consecutive NBA seasons (2009-2010 to 2019-2020) were reviewed from publicly available sources. A 10-question survey was developed and utilized to analyze each video clip. These questions were divided into three categories: 1. contact mechanism, 2. activity at the time of injury, and 3. position of the involved lower extremity at the time of injury. Two reviewers analyzed the videos individually, and differing answers were resolved via consensus review, with a senior author arbitrating in the case of any discrepancies. RESULTS: Overall, 23 ACL ruptures were included. The most common injury mechanism was indirect contact with another player without knee contact (56.5%), and no patients had an ACL rupture as a result of direct knee contact with another player. The most common action at the time of injury was pivoting (47%), and the most common basketball action was dribbling (43.5%). Additionally, the vast majority of patients were injured while on offense (91.3%). The most common knee positions were early flexion (73.9%) and abduction (95.7%). The most common foot positions were abduction relative to the knee (82.6%), in eversion (73.9%), and dorsiflexion (56.5%). The most common hip position was early flexion (87%), and all hips were abducted (100%). CONCLUSION: Our study found that the majority of ACL ruptures occurred during offensive play and over half were secondary to contact with an opposing player (but without a direct blow to the injured knee), indicating that such perturbations may alter the kinematics of the players' movement. Additionally, a large majority of ACL injuries occurred while the hip was abducted with the knee in abduction relative to the hip and while the knee was in early flexion from 0° to 45°.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Basketball , Video Recording , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnosis , Basketball/injuries , Biomechanical Phenomena , Male , Athletic Injuries/physiopathology , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Young Adult , Adult , United States/epidemiology , FemaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The reported incidence of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA) after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) varies considerably. Further, there are gaps in identifying which patients are at risk for PTOA after ACLR and whether there are modifiable factors. PURPOSE: To (1) determine the incidence of PTOA in a primary ACLR cohort and (2) identify patient and perioperative factors associated with the development of PTOA after primary ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Data from the Kaiser Permanente ACLR Registry were used to conduct a cohort study. Patients who had undergone primary ACLR without a previous diagnosis of osteoarthritis were identified (2009-2020). The crude incidence of PTOA was calculated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator with a multistate model. The association of patient and operative factors with the development of PTOA after primary ACLR was modeled as a time to event using multistate Cox proportional hazards regression. Models stratified by age (<22 and ≥22 years) were also conducted because of the effect modification of age. RESULTS: The study sample included 41,976 cases of primary ACLR. The incidence of PTOA was 1.7%, 5.1%, and 13.6% at 2, 5, and 10 year follow-ups, respectively. Risk factors for PTOA that were consistently identified in the overall cohort and age-stratified groups included a body mass index ≥30 versus <30 and an allograft or quadriceps tendon autograft versus a hamstring tendon autograft. Patients presenting with knee pain after ACLR were further identified when considering postoperative factors. Other risk factors for PTOA in the overall cohort included age ≥22 versus <22 years, bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft, hypertension, cartilage injury, meniscal injury, revision after primary ACLR with concomitant meniscal/cartilage surgery, multiligament injury, other activity at the time of injury compared with sport, and tibial tunnel drilling technique rather than the anteromedial portal. CONCLUSION: Knee pain after ACLR may be an early sign of PTOA. Surgeons should consider the adverse associations of a higher body mass index and an allograft or quadriceps tendon autograft with the development of PTOA, as these were factors identified with a higher risk, regardless of a patient's age at the time of primary ACLR.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Female , Male , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/etiology , Risk Factors , Adult , Young Adult , Incidence , Adolescent , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Cohort Studies , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Middle Aged , Registries , Age Factors , Body Mass IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The ideal graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) in young athletes has a high return-to-sport (RTS) rate and a low reinjury rate. Quadriceps tendon autografts are being used with increasing frequency for ACLR in this population, despite a paucity of evidence to support their use. PURPOSE: To report the RTS rate, ipsilateral reinjury rate, and contralateral ACL injury rate in a young athletic population undergoing primary ACLR using an all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) autograft. STUDY DESIGN: Cases series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients aged 14 to 22 years who underwent primary ACLR using an ASTQT autograft by a single surgeon between January 1, 2005, and April 30, 2020, were identified via electronic medical records and contacted ≥24 months after ACLR to complete a survey regarding subsequent ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injuries and RTS. Patients who had undergone previous ACLR (ipsilateral or contralateral) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 656 patients (330 male, 326 female; mean age, 17.9 years) were identified, and 395 patients completed the survey (60.2%; 174 male, 221 female; mean age, 17.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 73 ± 29 months (range, 24-139 months). The RTS rate was high (male: 87.7%; female: 82.8%; P = .19). Male and female patients had similar rates of revision ACLR (male: 12.6%; female: 10.0%; P = .40) and contralateral ACL injuries (male: 13.8%; female: 11.3%; P = .46). CONCLUSION: A high RTS rate and similar rates of ipsilateral and contralateral ACL injuries were found for male and female patients in a young athletic population undergoing primary ACLR using an ASTQT autograft. These results help one to better understand the utility of ASTQT grafts to support successful ACLR in young athletic populations, for which ASTQT grafts appear to yield favorable outcomes.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Autografts , Quadriceps Muscle , Reinjuries , Return to Sport , Tendons , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Male , Female , Adolescent , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Young Adult , Quadriceps Muscle/transplantation , Sex Factors , Tendons/transplantation , Transplantation, Autologous , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding career length and competition level after combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial- or lateral-sided surgeries in elite athletes. PURPOSE: To evaluate career length after surgical treatment of combined ACL plus medial collateral ligament (MCL) and ACL plus posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries in elite athletes and, in a subgroup analysis of male professional soccer players, to compare career length and competition level after combined ACL+MCL or ACL+PLC surgeries with a cohort who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of elite athletes undergoing combined ACL+MCL and ACL+PLC surgery was analyzed between February 2001 and October 2019. A subgroup of male elite soccer players from this population was compared with a previously identified cohort having had isolated primary ACLR without other ligament surgery. A minimum 2-year follow-up was required. Outcome measures were career length and competition level. RESULTS: A total of 98 elite athletes met the inclusion criteria, comprising 50 ACL+PLC and 48 ACL+MCL surgeries. The mean career length after surgical treatment of combined ACL+MCL and ACL+PLC injuries was 4.5 years. Return-to-play (RTP) time was significantly longer for ACL+PLC injuries (12.8 months; P = .019) than for ACL+MCL injuries (10.9 months). In the subgroup analysis of soccer players, a significantly lower number of players with combined ACL+PLC surgery were able to RTP (88%; P = .003) compared with 100% for ACL+MCL surgery and 97% for isolated ACLR, as well as requiring an almost 3 months longer RTP timeline (12.9 months; P = .002) when compared with the isolated ACL (10.2 months) and combined ACL+MCL (10.0 months) groups. However, career length and competition level were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Among elite athletes, the mean career length after surgical treatment of combined ACL+MCL and ACL+PLC injuries was 4.5 years. Professional soccer players with combined ACL+PLC surgery returned at a lower rate and required a longer RTP time when compared with the players with isolated ACL or combined ACL+MCL injuries. However, those who did RTP had the same career longevity and competition level.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Return to Sport , Soccer , Humans , Male , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Soccer/injuries , Young Adult , Adult , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee/surgery , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee/injuries , Athletic Injuries/surgery , Athletes , Retrospective Studies , Adolescent , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The potential influence of a preoperative anterolateral ligament (ALL) lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the mid- and long-term surgical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still controversial. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rate of isolated ACL reconstruction at a minimum 5-year follow-up in patients with and without ALL injury diagnosed preoperatively using MRI. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with acute ACL injury was divided into 2 groups based on the presence (ALL injury group) or absence (control group) of ALL injury on preoperative MRI. This is a longer-term follow-up study of a previously published study that had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Both groups underwent anatomic isolated reconstruction of the ACL. The Lysholm and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, KT-1000 arthrometer and pivot-shift tests, reconstruction failure rate, incidence of contralateral ACL injury, presence of associated meniscal injury, and presence of knee hyperextension were evaluated. The evaluation at the 5-year follow-up was also compared with the same patient's evaluation at 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were evaluated. No significant differences were found between the groups in the preoperative evaluation. In the postoperative evaluation, patients in the ALL injury group had a higher reconstruction failure rate (14.3% vs 4.6% for the control group; P = .049) and worse clinical outcomes according to the Lysholm scores (85.0 ± 10.3 vs 92.3 ± 6.6; P < .00001). Although the pivot-shift test results were similar, anteroposterior translation using the KT-1000 arthrometer revealed worse results for the ALL injury group (2.8 ± 1.4 mm vs 1.9 ± 1.3 mm; P = .00018). Patients in the ALL injury group also had an increase in KT-1000 arthrometer values from 2 to 5 years (2.4 ± 1.6 vs 2.8 ± 1.4; P = .038). Patients in the control group had no differences in outcomes from 2 to 5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Combined ACL and ALL injuries were associated with significantly less favorable outcomes than were isolated ACL injuries at a minimum follow-up of 5 years after isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Patients with concomitant ALL injury showed a higher failure rate and worse functional scores. Also, knee stability tended to slightly worsen from 2 to 5 years in cases of associated ALL injury.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Prospective Studies , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Adult , Male , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Young Adult , Treatment Outcome , Adolescent , Hamstring Tendons/transplantationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In adults with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, bone bruises on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans provide insight into the underlying mechanism of injury. There is a paucity of literature that has investigated these relationships in children with ACL tears. PURPOSE: To examine and compare the number and location of bone bruises between contact and noncontact ACL tears in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Boys ≤14 years and girls ≤12 years of age who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery between 2018 and 2022 were identified at 3 separate institutions. Eligibility criteria required detailed documentation of the mechanism of injury and MRI performed within 30 days of the initial ACL tear. Patients with congenital lower extremity abnormalities, concomitant fractures, injuries to the posterolateral corner and/or posterior cruciate ligament, previous ipsilateral knee injuries or surgeries, or closed physes evident on MRI scans were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on a contact or noncontact mechanism of injury. Preoperative MRI scans were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of bone bruises in the coronal and sagittal planes using fat-suppressed T2-weighted images and a grid-based mapping technique of the tibiofemoral joint. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included, with 76 (69.7%) patients sustaining noncontact injuries and 33 (30.3%) patients sustaining contact injuries. There were no significant differences between the contact and noncontact groups in terms of age (11.8 ± 2.0 vs 12.4 ± 1.3 years; P = .12), male sex (90.9% vs 88.2%; P > .99), time from initial injury to MRI (10.3 ± 8.1 vs 10.4 ± 8.9 days; P = .84), the presence of a concomitant medial meniscus tear (18.2% vs 14.5%; P = .62) or lateral meniscus tear (69.7% vs 52.6%; P = .097), and sport-related injuries (82.9% vs 81.8%; P = .89). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of combined lateral tibiofemoral (lateral femoral condyle + lateral tibial plateau) bone bruises (87.9% contact vs 78.9% noncontact; P = .41) or combined medial tibiofemoral (medial femoral condyle [MFC] + medial tibial plateau) bone bruises (54.5% contact vs 35.5% noncontact; P = .064). Patients with contact ACL tears were significantly more likely to have centrally located MFC bruising (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.6-11; P = .0038) and less likely to have bruising on the anterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.097-0.76; P = .013). CONCLUSION: Children with contact ACL tears were 4 times more likely to present with centrally located MFC bone bruises on preoperative MRI scans compared with children who sustained noncontact ACL tears. Future studies should investigate the relationship between these bone bruise patterns and the potential risk of articular cartilage damage in pediatric patients with contact ACL tears.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Contusions , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Male , Female , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Child , Contusions/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Retrospective Studies , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Tibia/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
There are many graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, including autografts and allografts. The choice of graft has been identified as a significant factor affecting the outcome of ACL reconstruction. This study aimed to determine whether allograft or autograft is better for avoiding revisional ACL reconstruction. The National Health Insurance Service-Health screening database analyzed 146,122 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery from Jan. 1, 2002, to Dec. 31, 2021. The study was conducted in two groups, autograft or allograft, and the rates of revision ACL reconstruction between the two groups were compared. Propensity score matching and multivariable Cox Proportional Hazard model analysis were used. The significant predictors for complications (p < 0.05) were as follows. The total of patients with ACL reconstruction was 146,122. Allograft was used in 121,148 patients, and autograft was used in 24,974 patients. 9.2% of the allograft group and 8.7% of the autograft group underwent revision ACL reconstruction. (P < .0001) 70.0% & 63.6% of patients underwent revision surgery within 1 year in the allograft & autograft groups, respectively. In summary, using autograft in primary ACL reconstruction is helpful in lowering the rate of revision surgery.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Reoperation , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Autografts , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Transplantation, Autologous , Allografts , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the correlation between medial tibial slope (MTS) and lateral tibial slope (LTS) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MTS measured by different imaging, and the intra- and interobserver reliability of measurements between reviewers with gaps of experience over 10 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 97 patients (93 males, 4 females; mean age: 30.8±8.3 years; range, 17 to 49 years) with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries who subsequently underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon between January 2005 and December 2014. The MTS was measured on lateral knee radiographs, and MTS and LTS were measured on MRIs. Three different reviewers, including a postgraduate year doctor, an orthopedic resident, and an attending orthopedic surgeon, performed the measurements. Each reviewer measured the slope of the same image three times. The correlations of MTS on radiographs and MTS/LTS on MRIs were calculated. Intra- and interobserver reliability were evaluated. RESULTS: The average MTS and LTS measured on MRI were not significantly different (6.4° and 6.9°, respectively; p=0.268) and exhibited a moderate positive correlation (r=0.544, p<0.001). The average MTS on radiographs was significantly greater than that on MRI (10.5° and 6.4°, respectively; p<0.001) with a low positive correlation (r=0.480, p<0.001). The intraobserver reliability of the postgraduate year doctor, the orthopedic resident, and the attending orthopedic surgeon were moderate to excellent. The interobserver reliability of MTS on radiographs was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.925; p<0.001). The interobserver reliability of MTS on MRI as well as LTS on MRI was good (ICC=0.755 and 820, respectively; all p values <0.001). CONCLUSION: Average MTS and LTS measured on MRI in patients with ACL injury exhibited a moderate positive correlation. The average MTS measured on radiographs was significantly greater than that on MRI with a low positive correlation.