Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 9.172
Filter
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(8): e5806, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090769

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the prescription of beta-blockers (ß-blockers) for patients with asthma. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Patient Sample (NPS) of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) of South Korea, ß-blockers and asthma medications were investigated using generic name codes provided by HIRA. Concomitant administration was identified when a ß-blocker and an asthma medication were co-prescribed in one billing statement or when separate ß-blocker and asthma prescriptions had overlapping dates of use. RESULTS: In the 1027 patients with asthma who were prescribed non-selective ß-blockers (non-SBs), 3087 non-SB prescriptions were identified, of which 62.3% and 37.3% were for carvedilol and propranolol, respectively. Of the 906 patients with asthma prescribed selective ß-blockers (SBs), 2942 SB prescriptions were identified, of which 48.5%, 28.3%, and 20.3% were for bisoprolol, atenolol, and nebivolol, respectively. Overall, 2149 non-SB and 2124 SB prescriptions with overlapping use dates with asthma medications were identified, which were prescribed to 726 and 657 patients, accounting for 70.7% and 72.5% of the patients receiving non-SBs and SBs, respectively. ß2-agonists accounted for 39.9% of the concomitant asthma medications with overlapping dates of use with non-SBs. Co-prescribing of bronchodilators occurred at a rate of 38.7% and 45.1% for the 3087 non-SB prescriptions and 2942 SB prescriptions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol and propranolol accounted for half of all ß-blockers prescribed to asthma patients. Prescribing ß-blockers to patients with asthma requires caution to prevent exacerbation of asthma and drug interactions between ß-blockers and co-prescribed asthma medications.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists , Asthma , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Republic of Korea , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent
2.
Ital J Pediatr ; 50(1): 140, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090673

ABSTRACT

Pediatric asthma management is a compelling challenge for every pediatrician. Different aspects require attention and definition. The present Intersocietal Survey aimed to collect real-world experiences from a sample of Italian pediatricians. A web platform was used to collect anonymous answers to the survey questions.Four hundred four pediatricians participated in this initiative promoted by the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP), the Society of Preventive and Social Pediatrics (SIPPS), and the Federation of Italian Pediatricians (FIMP).The results showed an extensive participation of primary care pediatricians (72%). There was a large consensus about diagnostic criteria and medication choice. However, treatment duration and device choice were various. Adherence to guidelines on general aspects of practical clinical management was high.In conclusion, the present Intersocietal Survey confirmed that pediatric asthma management is rather satisfactory, even if further improvement should concern a more widespread use of ICS for acute asthma/wheezing attacks, a better definition of the duration of ICS and bronchodilator use, and hospital-primary care integration.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Humans , Asthma/therapy , Asthma/drug therapy , Italy , Child , Male , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Female , Surveys and Questionnaires , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Guideline Adherence
3.
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) ; 70(7): 58-65, 2024 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39097895

ABSTRACT

This investigation aimed to explore the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory effects of Cade oil and its efficacy within a Wistar allergic asthma model. The antioxidant activity was assessed through various in vitro tests using chain-breaking antioxidant effects (radical scavenging and reducing abilities assays).  In vivo experiments involved Wistar rats categorized into four groups: negative control group, Ovalbumin-sensitised/challenged group, Cade oil-treated group, and Ovalbumin-sensitised/challenged Cade oil-treated group. These experiments aimed to evaluate oxidative stress parameters in the lungs and erythrocytes. The results indicated that the Cade oil exhibited significant antioxidant capabilities, evidenced by its radical scavenging activity against DPPH, ABTS, and Galvinoxyl radicals, with IC50 values ranging from 21.92 to 24.44 µg/mL. Besides, the reducing abilities methods showed A0,5 value ranging from 11.51 to 30.40  µg/mL for reducing power, Cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity, and O-phenanthroline assays. Additionally, the IC50 value for ß-carotene scavenging was found to be (8.2 ± 0.25 µg/ml). Analysis revealed high levels of polyphenols and flavonoids in Cade oil, indicating rich polyphenol (275.21 ± 3.14 mg GAE/g DW) and flavonoid (28.23 ± 1.91 µg QE/mg) content. In vivo findings highlighted Cade oil's efficacy in reducing inflammatory cell recruitment, enhancing antioxidant status, reducing lipid peroxidation, and improving histopathological alterations within the allergic asthma model. These results demonstrated that Cade oil has a potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-asthmatic properties, suggesting its potential therapeutic application in asthma treatment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Anti-Inflammatory Agents , Antioxidants , Asthma , Disease Models, Animal , Juniperus , Rats, Wistar , Animals , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/metabolism , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Antioxidants/chemistry , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/chemistry , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/chemistry , Juniperus/chemistry , Rats , Plant Oils/pharmacology , Plant Oils/chemistry , Plant Oils/therapeutic use , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Male , Ovalbumin , Lung/drug effects , Lung/pathology , Lung/metabolism
4.
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc ; 134: 94-112, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39135597

ABSTRACT

Surfactant Protein A (SP-A) is an innate immune modulator produced by the lung with known protective effects against bacteria and viruses. Its role in asthma, an inflammatory lung disease that affects 10% of the world's population, is not entirely known. In this review, we demonstrate that SP-A confers protection against exposure to interleukin-13, a type 2 cytokine integral to eosinophilic asthma, in a mouse model of SP-A deficiency, a house dust mite model of asthma, and in human bronchial epithelial cells from participants with asthma. We also show that small peptides derived from SP-A, such as the major allele of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1965708, which includes the carbohydrate recognition domain of SP-A2 at position 223, reduce airway hyperresponsiveness, airway eosinophils, and mucus in a mouse model of asthma. These data suggest that SP-A has beneficial effects relevant to asthma and that an SP-A peptide may have a new therapeutic use in asthma.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Disease Models, Animal , Immunity, Innate , Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein A , Asthma/immunology , Asthma/drug therapy , Animals , Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein A/genetics , Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein A/metabolism , Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein A/immunology , Humans , Mice , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Interleukin-13/metabolism , Interleukin-13/immunology , Interleukin-13/genetics , Lung/immunology , Lung/metabolism , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Pyroglyphidae/immunology
5.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 25(11): 1507-1516, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099418

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is a common disease with a global burden of 358 million patients. Despite improvements in pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, many patients still do not achieve complete asthma control. Therefore, innovative pharmacotherapy is important. AREAS COVERED: Following a semi-structured search in Pubmed, an overview of advances in inhaled asthma therapy is provided, looking at innovations in digital inhalers, eco-friendly inhalers and novel inhaled biologic therapies, antibiotics and vaccines, as well as other potential novel asthma therapy targets. EXPERT OPINION: Digital inhalers, sending reminders and monitoring inhalation technique electronically, can support medication adherence and improve asthma control. To reduce the global warming potential of traditional aerosols used in pressurized metered-dose inhalers (HFA-134a, HFA-227ea), greener alternatives are under development (HFA-152a, HFO-1234ze) that are expected to be available by 2025. Current pharmacological advances in asthma therapy are mainly achieved by novel biologicals (anti-IgE, anti-IL5, anti-IL4/13, and anti-TSLP) targeting specific severe asthma phenotypes. While injection is the usual administration route for biologics and vaccines used in asthma, inhalation is an option being explored, although several (mainly formulation) challenges need to be overcome. Other potential novel future inhaled asthma therapies include anti-IL-33/ST2 biologicals and JAK inhibitors, all still requiring more clinical evidence.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Asthma , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Administration, Inhalation , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Medication Adherence , Drug Development , Aerosols
6.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1425906, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39136011

ABSTRACT

Background and aims: Allergic asthma has a considerable burden on the quality of life. A significant portion of moderate-to-severe allergic asthma patients need omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin-E monoclonal antibody, as an add-on therapy. In this phase III clinical trial P043 (Zerafil®, CinnaGen, Iran) efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were compared with Xolair® (the originator omalizumab). The primary outcome was the rate of protocol-defined asthma exacerbations. Methods: Exacerbation rates, Asthma Control Test (ACT) results, spirometry measurements, immunogenicity, and safety were evaluated. Each subject received either medication with a dose ranging from 150 to 375 mg based on pre-treatment serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg) every two or four weeks for a duration of 28 weeks. Results: Exacerbation rates were 0.150 (CI: 0.079-0.220) in the P043 group, and 0.190 (CI: 0.110-0.270) in the omalizumab group (per-protocol). The least squares mean differences of predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in the First second (FEV1) were -2.51% (CI: -7.17-2.15, P=0.29) and -3.87% (CI: -8.79-1.04, P=0.12), pre- and post-bronchodilator use. The mean ± SD of ACT scores at the screening and the last visit were 10.62 ± 2.93 and 20.93 ± 4.26 in P043 and 11.09 ± 2.75 and 20.46 ± 5.11 in the omalizumab group. A total of 288 adverse events were reported for the 256 enrolled participants. Among all, "dyspnea" and "headache" were the most reported ones. The overall incidence of adverse events (P=0.62) and serious adverse events (P=0.07) had no significant differences between the two groups. None of the samples were positive for anti-drug antibodies. Conclusion: P043 was equivalent to omalizumab in the management of asthma in reduction of exacerbations. There was no significant difference in other efficacy and safety parameters. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05813470) and www.IRCT.ir (IRCT20150303021315N20).


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Asthma , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Omalizumab , Humans , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Omalizumab/adverse effects , Asthma/drug therapy , Male , Female , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Therapeutic Equivalency , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Young Adult , Severity of Illness Index
7.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 12(8): e1357, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39110093

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to explore the best therapeutic regimen and treatment duration of cough variant asthma (CVA) in children. METHODS: A total of 314 children with CVA were divided into receive inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) group, ICS combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) group, ICS monotherapy group and LTRA monotherapy group. All clinical data were statistically analyzed. Logistic regression model was used to compare the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment schemes at each follow-up time point and the best treatment scheme. The Cox proportional hazard regression model based on inverse probability weighting was used to compare the effects of different medication regimens on adverse outcomes with asthma recurrence or progression as the end point. RESULTS: (1) After comprehensive analysis, ICS + LABA group was the preferred control regimen for CVA within 8 weeks. After 8 weeks of diagnosis, the efficacy of ICS group or LTRA group was comparable to that of ICS + LABA group and ICS + LTRA group. (2) The ICS + LABA group showed a significant improvement in cough at an early stage, particularly at 4 weeks; the symptoms of ICS + LTRA and ICS groups were significantly improved at 36 weeks. The LTRA group alone showed significant improvement at 20 weeks. CONCLUSION: ICS + LABA, ICS + LTRA, ICS alone and LTRA alone can effectively treat CVA. ICS + LABA could improve the symptoms most quickly within 8 weeks after CVA diagnosis, followed by ICS + LATR group. After 8 weeks, it can be reduced to ICS alone to control CVA for at least 36 weeks based on the remission of symptoms in children.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Asthma , Cough , Drug Therapy, Combination , Leukotriene Antagonists , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Cough/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Child , Treatment Outcome , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Administration, Inhalation , Leukotriene Antagonists/therapeutic use , Leukotriene Antagonists/administration & dosage , Child, Preschool , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Longitudinal Studies , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Cough-Variant Asthma
9.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 300, 2024 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39113044

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incorporation of LAMAs into asthma therapy has been expected to enhance symptom control. However, a significant number of patients with asthma continue to experience poorly managed symptoms. There have been limited investigations on LAMA-induced airway alterations in asthma treatment employing IOS. In this study, we administered a LAMA to patients with poorly controlled asthma, evaluated clinical responses and respiratory function, and investigated airway changes facilitated by LAMA treatments using the IOS. METHODS: Of a total of 1282 consecutive patients with asthma, 118 exhibited uncontrolled symptoms. Among them, 42 switched their treatment to high-dose fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) (ICS/LABA/LAMA). The patients were then assessed using AHQ-33 or LCQ and ACT. Spirometry parameters (such as FEV1 or MMEF) and IOS parameters (such as R20 or AX) were measured and compared before and after exacerbations and the addition of LAMA. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients, 17 who switched to FF/UMEC/VI caused by dyspnea exhibited decreased pulmonary function between period 1 and baseline, followed by an increase in pulmonary function between baseline and period 2. Significant differences were observed in IOS parameters such as R20, R5-R20, Fres, or AX between period 1 and baseline as well as between baseline and period 2. Among the patients who switched to inhaler due to cough, 25 were classified as responders (n = 17) and nonresponders (n = 8) based on treatment outcomes. Among nonresponders, there were no significant differences in spirometry parameters such as FEV1 or PEF and IOS parameters such as R20 or AX between period 1 and baseline. However, among responders, significant differences were observed in all IOS parameters, though not in most spirometry parameters, between period 1 and baseline. Furthermore, significant differences were noted between baseline and period 2 in terms of FEV1, %MMEF, %PEF, and all IOS parameters. CONCLUSION: ICS/LABA/LAMA demonstrates superiority over ICS/LABA in improving symptoms and lung function, which is primarily attributed to the addition of LAMA. Additionally, IOS revealed the effectiveness of LAMA across all airway segments, particularly in the periphery. Hence, LAMA can be effective against various asthma phenotypes characterized by airway inflammation, even in real-world cases.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Muscarinic Antagonists , Oscillometry , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/physiopathology , Asthma/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Oscillometry/methods , Adult , Aged , Drug Combinations , Quinuclidines/administration & dosage , Chlorobenzenes/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use
10.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(15)2024 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39125709

ABSTRACT

The most promising treatment options for severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) have emerged in recent years with the development of monoclonal antibodies for blocking selective targets responsible for the underlying inflammation, such as mepolizumab and benralizumab. However, there is variability in treatment response that is not fully controlled. The variability of the response to mepolizumab and benralizumab could be influenced by single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and it would be useful to detect these and use them as predictive biomarkers of response. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 72 Caucasian patients recruited from a tertiary hospital with severe uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab and benralizumab. Polymorphisms in the IL5 (rs4143832, rs17690122), RAD50 (rs11739623, rs4705959), IL1RL1 (rs1420101, rs17026974, rs1921622), GATA2 (rs4857855), IKZF2 (rs12619285), FCGR2A (rs1801274), FCGR2B (rs3219018, rs1050501), FCGR3A (rs10127939, rs396991), FCER1A (rs2251746, rs2427837), FCER1B (rs1441586, rs573790, rs569108), and ZNF415 (rs1054485) genes were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Taqman probes. The response was analyzed after 12 months of treatment. In patients under mepolizumab treatment, a treatment response defined as a reduction in exacerbations was associated with ZNF415 rs1054485-T (p = 0.042; OR = 5.33; 95% CI = 1.06-30.02), treatment response defined as a reduction in oral corticosteroids use was associated with the number of exacerbations in the previous year (p = 0.029; OR = 3.89; 95% CI = 1.24-14.92), and treatment response defined as improvement in lung function was associated with the age at the beginning of biological therapy (p = 0.002; OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.04-1.18), FCER1B rs569108-AA (p < 0.001; OR = 171.06; 95% CI = 12.94-6264.11), and FCER1A rs2427837-A (p = 0.021; OR = 8.61; 95% CI = 1.71-76.62). On the other hand, in patients under benralizumab treatment, treatment response, defined as a reduction in exacerbations, was associated with ZNF415 rs1054485-T (p = 0.073; OR = 1.3 × 108; 95% CI = 1.8 × 10-19-NA), FCER1B rs569108-AA (p = 0.050; OR = 11.51; 95% CI = 1.19-269.78), allergies (p = 0.045; OR = 4.02; 95% CI = 1.05-16.74), and sex (p = 0.028; OR = 4.78; 95% CI = 1.22-20.63); and treatment response defined as improvement in lung function was associated with polyposis (p = 0.027; OR = 9.16; 95% CI = 1.58-91.4), IKZF2 rs12619285-AA (p = 0.019; OR = 9.1; 95% CI = 1.7-75.78), IL5 rs4143832-T (p = 0.017; OR = 11.1; 95% CI = 1.9-112.17), and FCER1B rs1441586-C (p = 0.045; OR = 7.81; 95% CI = 1.16-73.45). The results of this study show the potential influence of the studied polymorphisms on the response to mepolizumab and benralizumab and the clinical benefit that could be obtained by defining predictive biomarkers of treatment response.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Asthma , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/genetics , Female , Male , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Biomarkers , Treatment Outcome , Aged
11.
BMJ Open ; 14(8): e090749, 2024 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39174059

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A minority of school-aged children with asthma have persistent poor control and experience frequent asthma attacks despite maximal prescribed maintenance therapy. These children have higher morbidity and risk of death. The first add-on biologic therapy, omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks immunoglobulin (Ig)E, was licensed for children with severe asthma in 2005. While omalizumab is an effective treatment, non-response is common. A second biologic, mepolizumab which blocks interleukin 5 and targets eosinophilic inflammation, was licensed in 2018, but the licence was granted by extrapolation of adult clinical trial data to children. This non-inferiority (NI) trial will determine whether mepolizumab is as efficacious as omalizumab in reducing asthma attacks in children with severe therapy resistant asthma (STRA) and refractory difficult asthma (DA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an ongoing multicentre 1:1 randomised NI open-label trial of mepolizumab and omalizumab. Up to 150 children and young people (CYP) aged 6-17 years with severe asthma will be recruited from specialist paediatric severe asthma centres in the UK. Prior to randomisation, children will be monitored for medication adherence for up to 16 weeks to determine STRA and refractory DA diagnoses. Current prescribing recommendations of serum IgE and blood eosinophils will not influence eligibility or enrolment. The primary outcome is the 52-week asthma attack rate. Bayesian analysis using clinician-elicited prior distributions will be used to calculate the posterior probability that mepolizumab is not inferior to omalizumab. Secondary outcomes include Composite Asthma Severity Index, Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, lung function measures (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), bronchodilator reversibility), fractional exhaled nitric oxide, Asthma Control Test (ACT), health outcomes EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and optimal serum IgE and blood eosinophil levels that may predict a response to therapy. These outcomes will be analysed in a frequentist framework using longitudinal models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the South Central-Berkshire Research Ethics Committee REC Number 19/SC/0634 and had Clinical Trials Authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (EudraCT 2019-004085-17). All parents/legal guardians will give informed consent for their child to participate in the trial, and CYP will give assent to participate. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at international conferences and disseminated via our patient and public involvement partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12109108; EudraCT Number: 2019-004085-17.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Asthma , Omalizumab , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Child , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Male , Female , Equivalence Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Severity of Illness Index
15.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(4): e46-e53, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982601

ABSTRACT

Background: The standard therapeutic regimen for idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) involves the administration of oral corticosteroids (OCS). However, a notable proportion of individuals experience recurrent episodes after the tapering or cessation of OCS during the course of ICEP. There has been a growing interest in exploring alternative treatment modalities for patients with ICEP at heightened risk of relapse. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of mepolizumab at a dose of 100 mg administered every 4 weeks in preventing relapses of ICEP and its impact on the clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective clinical observational study used real-world data to assess the impact of mepolizumab on patients diagnosed with ICEP accompanied by severe asthma. Demographic information and clinical characteristics were extracted from medical records. The study examined the effect of mepolizumab on the annual relapse rate, OCS dose, eosinophil count, and respiratory function parameters. Results: All patients included in the study, with a median (range) follow-up period of 19 months (4-40 months), the annual relapse rate decreased from 0.33 to 0 after the initiation mepolizumab. In addition, the maintenance OCS dose, expressed in methylprednisolone equivalents, declined from 4 mg/day to 0 mg/day. A reduction in the blood eosinophil count was observed, alongside a partial improvement in respiratory function test results among the patients. Conclusion: A dose regimen of 100 mg of mepolizumab administered every 4 weeks emerges as a promising and well-tolerated therapeutic approach for averting relapses of ICEP.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Pulmonary Eosinophilia , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Eosinophilia/drug therapy , Pulmonary Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Aged , Recurrence , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Eosinophils , Leukocyte Count , Chronic Disease , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Follow-Up Studies
16.
Respir Res ; 25(1): 272, 2024 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38992639

ABSTRACT

Conventional immunosuppressants are ineffective for the management of EGPA-related asthma. Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TLSP) that has proven efficacy in several phase 3 studies for the treatment of asthma. We treated with off-label tezepelumab the first two patients with severe refractory EPGA-related asthma. These preliminary findings suggest that targeting upstream signaling of the T2 inflammatory pathway can improve symptoms, reduce BVAS and increase Asthma Control Test scores, even in patients with refractory asthma who have failed several previous lines of treatment. Nevertheless, by analogy with dupilumab-induced IL-4/13 blockade, the persistence of sputum eosinophilia (reported in both patients) raises questions as to whether TSLP inhibition could lead to a rebound of eosinophilia and potentially to eosinophil-related symptoms in patients with EGPA.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Asthma , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/diagnosis , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Female , Male , Treatment Outcome , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Churg-Strauss Syndrome/drug therapy , Churg-Strauss Syndrome/diagnosis , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/diagnosis
17.
Obes Surg ; 34(8): 2814-2819, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38990483

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery improves many obesity-related comorbidities, yet the literature remains inconclusive on the impact of bariatric surgery on asthma. Our primary objective was to identify the long-term impact of bariatric surgery on asthma severity and medication use. METHODS: A retrospective review was completed of all patients with a diagnosis of asthma who underwent bariatric surgery over 10 years at a single institution. Primary outcomes were the number of asthma medications prescribed at five time points (preoperative, postoperative < 18 months, 19-36 months, 37-60 months, 60 + months) after bariatric surgery. Secondary outcomes were spirometry results and BMI. RESULTS: There were 260 patients with 84.6% female predominance. There were 168 sleeve gastrectomy patients and 92 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Mean age was 47.6 ± 10.7 years, mean BMI was 46.0 ± 6.8 kg/m2, and 54.2% were previous tobacco users. The total number of patients on two or more asthma medications decreased from 46% preoperatively to 41% at 18 months, to 36% at 36 months, and to 32% at 60 months after surgery. The total number of patients free from asthma medication increased from 25% preoperatively to 33% at 60 months postoperatively. Asthma medication use decreased in both surgery groups, and neither operation demonstrated superiority. No significant improvement nor differences were found between groups at any time point regarding FEV1/FVC ratio spirometry measures. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery reduces the use of medications taken for management of asthma. The amount of asthma medication usage decreases with time and is sustained at 60 months after bariatric surgery.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Obesity, Morbid , Humans , Female , Asthma/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Severity of Illness Index , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Bariatric Surgery , Spirometry , Body Mass Index , Gastric Bypass
18.
Lung ; 202(4): 441-448, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39007944

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nasal polyposis (NP) is a comorbidity of type 2 severe asthma (SA) which could influence response to SA biologics. METHODS: We evaluated (super-) response in SA patients with (NP +) and without NP (NP-) enrolled in the Belgian Severe Asthma Registry (BSAR). RESULTS: 914 patients, of whom 31% NP + , were included. At enrollment, NP + patients had higher annual exacerbation rates, higher number of emergency room visits and more elevated type 2 biomarkers. In the longitudinal subanalysis of 104 patients, both groups had significant and similar asthma responses to asthma biologics, except for a greater increase in FEV1 in the NP + group. Super-response was achieved in 33 patients (32%), irrespective of NP status or type of biologic. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, both NP + and NP - patients had positive treatment responses, with some able to achieve super-response. In SA patients with NP, a greater FEV1 improvement as compared to SA patients without NP was observed.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Biological Products , Nasal Polyps , Registries , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/physiopathology , Asthma/epidemiology , Male , Female , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Nasal Polyps/complications , Nasal Polyps/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Belgium/epidemiology , Adult , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Forced Expiratory Volume , Severity of Illness Index , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
19.
Clin Chest Med ; 45(3): 611-623, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39069325

ABSTRACT

This article is a comprehensive review of the latest knowledge and developments on pediatric asthma. It serves as a guide for general practitioners and subspecialists who treat asthma. The pathophysiology and critical features of asthma that should be addressed and the latest therapies available are discussed. The areas where further investigation is needed are also highlighted.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Asthma , Humans , Asthma/therapy , Asthma/physiopathology , Asthma/diagnosis , Child , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL