Impact of line probe assay-based molecular testing on individualized treatment in patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: data from the prospective INNOVA4TB cohort study in Ukraine.

BACKGROUND: Ukraine remains a high World Health Organization priority country for drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). Rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) has a more protracted, more complicated, and more expensive treatment. In 2021, Ukraine reported 4025 RR-TB cases - 5.4 times more (751) than all 30 European Union/ European Economic Area countries together. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of line probe assay (LPA), AID Autoimmun Diagnostika GmbH, for detecting resistance to anti-TB drugs and its clinical application for selecting treatment regimens. DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: From May 2019 to June 2020, we consecutively enrolled patients with active TB hospitalized at the Regional Phthisiopulmonology Center (Vinnytsia, Ukraine), aged between 18 and 82 years. The LPA was performed in the Genetic Research Laboratory at National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine. RESULTS: A total of 84 clinical specimens and 97 culture isolates from 126 TB patients were tested during the study. Accuracy (95% confidence interval) of LPA for clinical samples in comparison with phenotypic drug susceptibility test (DST) was 80.1 (68.5-89.0) for isoniazid (H), 74.7 (62.4-84.6) for rifampicin (R), 74.4 (62.5-84.1) for ethambutol, 71.4 (41.9-91.6) for streptomycin, 84.6 (62.4-96.5) for prothionamide/ethionamide, and 84.6 (73.6-92.3) for levofloxacin (Lfx), respectively. We found a significantly higher sensitivity of LPA for H, R, and Lfx for the culture isolates compared to clinical specimens (p < 0.05). LPA detected different mutations in 6 out of 17 (35.5%) patients susceptible to R by Xpert. A shorter treatment regimen with an injectable agent demonstrated a low suitability rate of 5% (8/156) in a cohort of RR-TB patients from Ukraine. CONCLUSION: Initial LPA testing accurately identifies resistance to anti-TB drugs and facilitates the selection of an appropriate treatment regimen, minimizing exposure to empirical therapy.

Study about the impact of rapid resistance detection on the treatment of patients with tuberculosis in Ukraine written by healthcare and biomedical professionals to better understand how we can improve the results of treatment and to prevent spreading of resistant bacteriaWhy was the study done? Ukraine has over 4000 patients with tuberculosis (TB) resistant to at least one drug (rifampicin) - five times that of all 30 European Union/European Economic Area countries combined. Unfortunately, only about 60% of such patients have been successfully treated in 2019. At that time, the majority of people suffering from tuberculosis in Ukraine, after checking resistance to rifampicin, initially received standard combinations of the first-line or second-line anti-TB medicines before the result of traditionally used tests (usually few weeks later) became available to individualize the treatment. Alternatively, the sputum could be transported to some overloaded reference laboratories located hundreds of km away from the treatment places.What did the researchers do? The INNOVA4TB team implemented rapid diagnostics of drug resistance in routine practice, guiding key antibiotics use in TB patients. A total of 181 samples from 126 individuals were tested during 2019-2020.What did the researchers find? This new diagnostic technology accurately detected resistance to 9 anti-TB drugs in sputum samples. It could be helpful to select appropriate TB treatment regimens, reducing time for decision from 1 month up to 2 days. Recommended at the study time 9-month shorter standardized treatment regimen with injectable agent was suitable only for 5% of patients for whom it was indicated in Vinnytsia region of Ukraine.What do the findings mean? The study has demonstrated successful implementation of the new molecular diagnostic technology from scratch in a country with restricted resources and limited TB laboratory capacity. This test can facilitate optimal distribution of available wards among patients with different profiles of resistance and correct choice between treatment options.

Accuracy of the tuberculosis molecular bacterial load assay to diagnose and monitor response to anti-tuberculosis therapy: a longitudinal comparative study with standard-of-care smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, and culture in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the tuberculosis molecular bacterial load assay (TB-MBLA), a ribosomal RNA-based test, was acknowledged by WHO as a molecular assay that could replace smear microscopy and culture for monitoring tuberculosis treatment response. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of TB-MBLA for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment response in comparison with standard-of-care tests. METHODS: For this longitudinal prospective study, patients aged 18 years or older with presumptive tuberculosis (coughing for at least 2 weeks, night sweats, and weight loss) were enrolled at China-Uganda Friendship Hospital Naguru (Kampala, Uganda). Participants were evaluated for tuberculosis by TB-MBLA in comparison with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) and smear microscopy, with Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture as a reference test. Participants who were positive on Xpert-Ultra were enrolled on a standard 6-month anti-tuberculosis regimen, and monitored for treatment response at weeks 2, 8, 17, and 26 after initiation of treatment and then 3 months after treatment. FINDINGS: Between Nov 15, 2019, and June 15, 2022, 210 participants (median age 35 years [IQR 27-44]) were enrolled. 135 (64%) participants were male and 72 (34%) were HIV positive. The pretreatment diagnostic sensitivities of TB-MBLA and Xpert-Ultra were similar (both 99% [95% CI 95-100]) but the specificity was higher for TB-MBLA (90% [83-96]) than for Xpert-Ultra (78% [68-86]). Ten participants were Xpert-Ultra trace positive, eight (80%) of whom were negative by TB-MBLA and MGIT culture. Smear microscopy had lower diagnostic sensitivity (75% [65-83]) but higher specificity (98% [93-100]) than TB-MBLA and Xpert-Ultra. Among participants who were smear microscopy negative, the sensitivity of TB-MBLA was 96% (95 CI 80-100) and was 100% (95% CI 86-100) in those who were HIV positive. 129 (61%) participants were identified as tuberculosis positive by Xpert-Ultra and these individuals were enrolled in the treatment group and monitored for treatment response. According to TB-MBLA, 19 of these patients cleared bacillary load to zero by week 2 of treatment and remained negative throughout the 6-month treatment follow-up. Positivity for tuberculosis decreased with treatment as measured by all tests, but the rate was slower with Xpert-Ultra. Consequently, 31 (33%) of 95 participants were still Xpert-Ultra positive at the end of treatment but were clinically well and negative on TB-MBLA and culture at 6 months of treatment. Two patients were still Xpert-Ultra positive with a further 3 months of post-treatment follow-up. The rate of conversion to negative of the DNA-based Xpert-Ultra was 3·3-times slower than that of the rRNA-based TB-MBLA. Consequently for the same patient, it would take 13 weeks and 52 weeks to reach complete tuberculosis negativity by TB-MBLA and Xpert-Ultra, respectively. Participants who were positive on smear microscopy at 8 weeks, who received an extra month of intensive treatment, had a similar TB-MBLA-measured bacillary load at 8 weeks to those who were smear microscopy negative. INTERPRETATION: TB-MBLA has a similar performance to Xpert-Ultra for pretreatment diagnosis of tuberculosis, but is more accurate at detecting and characterising the response to treatment than Xpert-Ultra and standard-of-care smear microscopy. FUNDING: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, Makerere University Research and Innovation Fund, US National Institutes of Health.

High-dose, short-duration versus standard rifampicin for tuberculosis preventive treatment: a partially blinded, three-arm, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is a key component of tuberculosis elimination. To improve completion and reduce the burden for people and health systems, short, safe, and effective TPT regimens are needed. We aimed to compare safety and treatment completion of various doses and durations of rifampicin in people who were recommended to receive TPT. METHODS: This partially blinded, parallel-arm, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial was done at seven university-affiliated clinics in Canada, Indonesia, and Viet Nam. Participants aged 10 years or older were included if they had an indication for TPT according to WHO guidelines for Indonesia and Viet Nam, or Canadian guidelines for Canadian sites, and a positive tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral rifampicin at 10 mg/kg once daily for 4 months (standard-dose group), 20 mg/kg daily for 2 months (20 mg/kg group), or 30 mg/kg daily for 2 months (30 mg/kg group). The randomisation sequence was computer generated with blocks of variable size (three, six, and nine) and stratified by country for Indonesia and Viet Nam, and by city within Canada. Participants and investigators were masked to dose in high-dose groups, but unmasked to duration in all groups. The two co-primary outcomes were safety (in the safety population, in which participants received at least one dose of the study drug) and treatment completion (in the modified intention-to-treat [mITT] population, excluding those ineligible after randomisation). Protocol-defined adverse events were defined as grade 3 or worse, or rash or allergy of any grade, judged by an independent and masked panel as possibly or probably related to the study. A margin of 4% was used to assess non-inferiority. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03988933 (active). FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 2019, and Sept 30, 2022, 1692 people were assessed for eligibility, 1376 were randomly assigned, and eight were excluded after randomisation. 1368 participants were included in the mITT population (454 in the standard group, 461 in the 20 mg/kg group, and 453 in the 30 mg/kg group). 589 (43%) participants were male and 779 (57%) were female. 372 (82%) in the standard-dose group, 329 (71%) in the 20 mg/kg group, and 293 (65%) in the 30 mg/kg group completed treatment. No participants in the standard-dose group, one (<1%) of 441 participants in the 20 mg/kg group, and four (1%) of 423 in the 30 mg/kg group developed grade 3 hepatotoxicity. Risk of protocol-defined adverse events was higher in the 30 mg/kg group than in the standard-dose group (adjusted risk difference 4·6% [95% CI 1·8 to 7·4]) or the 20 mg/kg group (5·1% [2·3 to 7·8]). There was no difference in the risk of adverse events between the 20 mg/kg and standard-dose groups (-0·5% [95% CI -2·4 to 1·5]; non-inferiority met). Completion was lower in the 20 mg/kg group (-7·8% [95% CI -13·6 to -2·0]) and the 30 mg/kg group (-15·4% [-21·4 to -9·4]) than in the standard-dose group. INTERPRETATION: In this trial, 2 months of 30 mg/kg daily rifampicin had significantly worse safety and completion than 4 months of 10 mg/kg daily and 2 months of 20 mg/kg daily (the latter, a fully blinded comparison); we do not consider 30 mg/kg to be a good option for TPT. Rifampicin at 20 mg/kg daily for 2 months was as safe as standard treatment, but with lower completion. This difference remains unexplained. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Trends of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Rifampicin resistance in Northwest Ethiopia: Xpert® MTB/RIF assay results from 2015 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in countries with limited resources. The emergence of drug resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), particularly rifampicin (RIF) resistance, hindered TB control efforts. Continuous surveillance and regular monitoring of drug-resistant TB, including rifampicin resistance (RR), are required for effective TB intervention strategies and prevention and control measures. OBJECTIVE: Determine the trend of TB and RR-TB among presumptive TB patients in Northwest Ethiopia. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UoG-CSH). The study included TB registration logbook data from all patients who visited the hospital and were tested for MTB using the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay between 2015 and 2021. The SPSS version 26 software was used to enter, clean, and analyze the laboratory-based data. RESULTS: A total of 18,787 patient results were included, with 93.8% (17,615/18787) of them being successful, meaning they were not invalid, error, or aborted. About 10.5% (1846/17615) of the 17,615 results were MTB-positive, with 7.42% (137/1846) RIF resistant. Age, anti-TB treatment history, and diagnosis year were associated with the presence of MTB and RR-MTB. Tuberculosis (TB) prevalence was higher in productive age groups, whereas RR-TB prevalence was higher in the elderly. Regarding diagnosis year, the prevalence of TB and RR-TB showed a declining trend as the year progressed. While MTB was detected in 12.8% (471/3669) of new and 22.2% (151/679) of re-treatment presumptive TB patients, RR-MTB was detected in 8.5% (40/471) of new and 18.5% (28/151) of re-treatment TB cases. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of TB and RR-TB in the study area showed a declining trend over the years. While TB was more prevalent in productive age groups (15 to 45 years), RR-TB was more prevalent in older populations (over 45 years), than others. Moreover, patients with a history of anti-TB drug exposure were more likely to be positive for DR-TB, highlighting the need to strengthen DOT programs for proper management of TB treatment.

Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for childhood tuberculosis in West Africa - a multicenter pragmatic study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of Xpert Mycobacterium Tuberculosis/rifampicin (MTB/RIF) Ultra (Ultra) for diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis (TB) within public health systems. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, children aged <15 years with presumptive pulmonary TB were consecutively recruited and evaluated for TB at tertiary-level hospitals in Benin, Mali, and Ghana. Bivariate random-effects models were used to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Ultra against culture. We also estimated its diagnostic yield against a composite microbiological reference standard (cMRS) of positive culture or Ultra. RESULTS: Overall, 193 children were included in the analyses with a median (interquartile range) age of 4.0 (1.1-9.2) years, 88 (45.6%) were female, and 36 (18.7%) were HIV-positive. Thirty-one (16.1%) children had confirmed TB, 39 (20.2%) had unconfirmed TB, and 123 (63.7%) had unlikely TB. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of Ultra verified by culture were 55.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.0-79.0%) and 95.0% (95% CI: 88.0-98.0%), respectively. Against the cMRS, the diagnostic yield of Ultra and culture were 67.7% (95% CI: 48.6-83.3%) and 70.9% (95% CI: 51.9-85.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultra has suboptimal sensitivity in children with TB that were investigated under routine conditions in tertiary-level hospitals in three West African countries.

Usefulness of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Tunisia.

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) remains a challenging diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Cepheid, USA) for rapid diagnosis of EPTB in Tunisia. Eight hundred and forty-seven extrapulmonary samples collected from 2017 to 2021, were subjected to Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra. Microscopy and culture were performed for all the specimens. The accuracy of Xpert Ultra was evaluated in comparison to the culture. Xpert Ultra diagnosed EPTB with a global sensitivity of 80.66% (74.3-85.75) and specificity of 70.87% (67.31-74.20). The molecular test was most accurate when performed in cerebrospinal fluids, bones and joints and cutaneous specimens showing a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity ranging from 70.60 to 91.11%. In lymph node samples comprising aspirates and biopsies, the sensitivity of Xpert Ultra was high 87.50% (77.23-93.53), however, the specificity was 51.08% (44.67-57.46). For pleural samples, the Xpert Ultra sensitivity was 77.50% (68.34-84.68) ranging from 71.43 to 80% in pleural biopsies and fluids respectively. The specificity in all pleural specimens was 79.56% (74.40-83.91). Xpert Ultra showed promise in the diagnosis of EPTB. The performances varied according to the site of the disease. The test may be more valuable if used in combination with other diagnostic modalities.

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for the rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in a clinical setting of high tuberculosis prevalence country and interpretation of 'trace' results.

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) from different types of extrapulmonary specimens in comparison with culture and composite microbiological reference standard (CRS). A total of 240 specimens were prospectively collected from presumptive EPTB patients between July 2021-January 2022 and tested by Ultra, Xpert, culture and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy. Out of 240 specimens, 35.8 %, 20.8 %, 11.3 %, and 7.1 % were detected as Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by Ultra, Xpert, culture and AFB microscopy, respectively. An additional 15.0 % cases were detected by Ultra compared to Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay. A total of 28 (11.7 %) cases were identified as 'trace' category by Ultra with indeterminate rifampicin resistance result; of which 36.4 % were clinically confirmed as EPTB. Compared to culture, the sensitivity and specificity of Ultra and Xpert were 100 % and 72.3 %; 92.6 % and 88.3 %, respectively. In comparison with CRS, these were respectively: 98.9 % and 100 %; 57.5 % and 100 %. For individual category of specimens, sensitivity of Ultra was 100 % with varying specificity. We found that Ultra was highly sensitive for the rapid diagnosis of EPTB and has extensive potential over current diagnostics in high TB burden countries, but 'trace' results should be interpreted with caution.

Advancing tuberculosis diagnosis and management in cynomolgus macaques using Xpert MTB/RIF ultra assay.

The detection and management of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) infection, the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), in macaques, including cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis), are of significant concern in research and regions where macaques coexist with humans or other animals. This study explored the utility of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay, a widely adopted molecular diagnostic tool to diagnose tuberculosis (TB) in humans, to detect DNA from the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples obtained from cynomolgus macaques. This investigation involved a comprehensive comparative analysis, integrating established conventional diagnostic methodologies, assessing oropharyngeal-tracheal wash (PW) and buccal swab (BS) specimen types, and follow-up assessments at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month intervals. Our results demonstrated that the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay was able to detect MTBC in 12 of 316 clinical samples obtained from cynomolgus macaques, presenting a potential advantage over bacterial culture and chest radiographs. The Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay exhibited exceptional sensitivity (100%) at the animal level, successfully detecting all macaques positive for M. tuberculosis as confirmed by traditional culture methods. The use of PW samples revealed that 5 positive samples from 99 (5.1%) were recommended for testing, compared to 0 samples from 99 buccal swab (BS) samples (0.0%). In particular, the definitive diagnosis of TB was confirmed in three deceased macaques by MTB culture, which detected the presence of the bacterium in tissue autopsy. Our findings demonstrate that the implementation of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay, along with prompt isolation measures, effectively reduced active TB cases among cynomolgus macaques over a 12-month period. These findings highlight the advance of the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay in TB diagnosis and its crucial role in preventing potential outbreaks in cynomolgus macaques. With its rapidity, high sensitivity, and specificity, the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay can be highly suitable for use in reference laboratories to confirm TB disease and effectively interrupt TB transmission.

The new Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (MTB/Rif) Ultra assay in comparison to Xpert MTB/Rif assay for diagnosis of tuberculosis in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Microbiological diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis (TB) using conventional microbiological techniques has been challenging due to paucibacillary nature of the disease. Molecular methods using cartridge-based tests like Xpert, have immensely improved diagnosis. A novel next-generation cartridge test, Xpert Ultra, incorporates two additional molecular targets and claims to have much lower detection limit. We attempted to compare the two techniques in presumptive pediatric TB patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/Rif Ultra with Xpert MTB/Rif for the detection of pediatric TB. STUDY DESIGN: This is an observational comparative analytical study. METHODS: Children under 15 years of age with presumptive TB were enrolled. Appropriate specimens were obtained (sputum, induced sputum or gastric aspirate for suspected pulmonary TB, cerebrospinal fluid for suspected tubercular meningitis and pleural fluid for suspected tubercular pleural effusion), subjected to smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture, Xpert and Xpert ultra tests and other appropriate diagnostic investigations. RESULTS: Out of 130 enrolled patients, 70 were diagnosed with TB using a composite reference standard (CRS). The overall sensitivity of Xpert was 64.29% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.93-75.93%] and that of Xpert Ultra was 80% (95% CI 68.73-88.61%) with 100% overall specificity for both. The sensitivity of Xpert and Xpert Ultra in pulmonary specimens (n = 112) was 66.67% and 79.37% and in extrapulmonary specimens (n = 18) was 42.86% and 85.71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study found Ultra to be more sensitive than Xpert for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in children. Our findings support the use of Xpert Ultra as initial rapid molecular diagnostic test in children under evaluation for TB.

ddPCR provides a sensitive test compared with GeneXpert MTB/RIF and mNGS for suspected Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.

Introduction: The Metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) exhibited a sensitivity for tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic performance. Research that directly compared the clinical performance of ddPCR analysis, mNGS, and Xpert in mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB) infection has not been conducted. Methods: The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ddPCR compared to mNGS and Xpert for the detection of MTB in multiple types of clinical samples. The final clinical diagnosis was used as the reference standard. Results: Out of 236 patients with suspected active TB infection, 217 underwent synchronous testing for tuberculosis using ddPCR, Xpert, and mNGS on direct clinical samples. During follow-up, 100 out of 217 participants were diagnosed with MTB infection. Compared to the clinical final diagnosis, ddPCR produced the highest sensitivity of 99% compared with mNGS (86%) and Xpert (64%) for all active MTB cases. Discussion: Twenty-two Xpert-negative samples were positive in mNGS tests, which confirmed the clinical diagnosis results from ddPCR and clinical manifestation, radiologic findings. Thirteen mNGS-negative samples were positive in ddPCR assays, which confirmed the clinical final diagnosis.ddPCR provides a higher sensitive compared to Xpert and mNGS for MTB diagnosis, as defined by the high concordance between ddPCR assay and clinical final diagnosis.

Adolescent tuberculosis in the ICU.

TB is a major concern in the paediatric age group, especially in India. More than 3.33 lakh children between 0 and 14 years of age are affected by TB. Adolescent tuberculosis has been a neglected area and this age group accounts for about 800,000 cases of tuberculosis (TB) cases every year. Information regarding adolescent tuberculosis patient requiring ICU admission/care is very scanty (unlike adult tuberculosis), and the authors believe that the mode of ICU presentation and challenges in adolescents would almost be the same as in adults, although the outcome is generally expected to be better in the adolescent population in view of lesser comorbidities when compared to adults. ARDS, multiorgan dysfunction and meningitis are the most common reasons for admission to ICU. Critically ill patients with TB carry a high mortality and the increased mortality is likely due to multiorgan dysfunction, nosocomial infections and sepsis. Advanced disease with chronic undernourishment influences not just morbidity but mortality as well. Further, the heavy financial burden incurred for ICU care in TB patients with poor expected outcome is a major concern since TB occurs predominantly in low socio-economic populations.

Effects of sputum bacillary load and age on GeneXpert and traditional methods in pulmonary tuberculosis: a 4-year retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of the GeneXpert® MTB/RIF (Xpert®), Auramine O staining method, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis and explore the effects of the sputum bacillary load (SBL) and qRT‒PCR threshold cycle (Ct) value on the detection methods. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the results in the Department of Infectious Disease for 49 months. The χ2 test was used to compare the performances of each method, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off values, and the factors associated with a false-negative result from Xpert® were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Simultaneous analysis of 980 sputum specimens showed that the positive detection rate of Xpert® did not increase with increasing SBL, and there were differences between the three when SBL ≤ 1 + (all P < 0.05). There was a good negative correlation between the Ct value and the SBL (P < 0.0001). Age was an independent risk factor for false-negative Xpert® results (P = 0.029), and when Ct < 16, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were both 100.00%. The optimal cut-off Ct values for resegmentation based on the drug resistance classification were < 18.6, 18.6-34.1, and > 34.1 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Xpert® was not affected by SBL but it was by age, and it is more advantageous when SBL ≤ 1 + . The results regarding rifampicin resistance were reliable, and the novel Ct segmentation was a practical and more clinically meaningful classification method for diagnosing rifampicin resistance. These findings will help improve physicians' ability to accurately diagnose TB.

Tuberculosis Variant with Rifampin Resistance Undetectable by Xpert MTB/RIF, Botswana.

GeneXpert MTB/RIF, a tool widely used for diagnosing tuberculosis, has limitations for detecting rifampin resistance in certain variants. We report transmission of a pre-extensively drug-resistant variant in Botswana that went undetected by GeneXpert. The public health impact of misdiagnosis emphasizes the need for comprehensive molecular testing to identify resistance and guide treatment.

Evaluation of the Cepheid 3-gene host response blood test for tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment response monitoring in a primary-level clinic in rural China.

A rapid, accurate, non-sputum-based triage test for diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) is a high-priority need. Cepheid developed a novel prototype blood test, Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis Host Response (Xpert-MTB-HR), which generates a TB score based on the mRNA expression of three genes. We conducted a case-control study with prospective recruitment to evaluate its accuracy in the clinic of the Wusheng County Centers for Disease Prevention and Control in China. We enrolled 149 TB patients, 248 other respiratory diseases (ORD) patients, and 193 healthy controls. In addition, whole-blood samples taken from TB patients after 2, 5, and 6 months of treatment were tested with Xpert-MTB-HR to evaluate its ability to monitor treatment response. Xpert-MTB-HR discriminated between TB and healthy controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.912 (95% CI, 0.878-0.945). With the specificity of 70% envisioned for a triage test, its sensitivity was 90.1% (84.9%-94.6%). Xpert-MTB-HR discriminated between TB and ORD with an AUC of 0.798 (0.750-0.847), and at specificity of 70%, the sensitivity was only 75.8% (68.5%-82.8%). In patients determined by Ultra to have medium or high sputum bacillary loads, with specificity of 70%, the sensitivity for discriminating patients with TB from healthy controls was 100.0% (100.0-100.0) and from patients with ORD, 95.1% (89.8-100.0). The TB scores generally increased by 2 months of treatment and then remained stable. Xpert-MTB-HR met the criteria for a triage test to discriminate between TB and healthy controls, but not between TB and ORD, except when limited to patients with high sputum bacillary loads. Xpert-MTB-HR showed promise for monitoring response to treatment but needs to be further evaluated in larger prospective studies.

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on contaminated liquid cultures for tuberculosis and rifampicin-resistance detection: a diagnostic accuracy evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) is a widely used rapid front-line tuberculosis and rifampicin-susceptibility testing. Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 liquid culture is used as an adjunct but is vulnerable to contamination. We aimed to assess whether Ultra can be used on to-be-discarded contaminated cultures. METHODS: We stored contaminated MGIT960 tubes (growth-positive, acid-fast bacilli [AFB]-negative) originally inoculated at a high-volume laboratory in Cape Town, South Africa, to diagnose patients with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis. Patients who had no positive tuberculosis results (smear, Ultra, or culture) at contamination detection and had another, later specimen submitted within 3 months of the contaminated specimen were selected. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of Ultra on contaminated growth from the first culture for tuberculosis (next-available non-contaminated culture result reference standard) and rifampicin resistance (vs MTBDRplus on a later isolate). We calculated potential time-to-diagnosis improvements and also evaluated the immunochromatographic MPT64 TBc assay. FINDINGS: Between June 1 and Aug 31, 2019, 36 684 specimens from 26 929 patients were processed for diagnostic culture. 2402 (7%) cultures from 2186 patients were contaminated. 1068 (49%) of 2186 patients had no other specimen submitted. After 319 exclusions, there were 799 people with at least one repeat specimen submitted; of these, we included in our study 246 patients (31%) with a culture-positive repeat specimen and 429 patients (54%) with a culture-negative repeat specimen. 124 patients (16%) with a culture-contaminated repeat specimen were excluded. When Ultra was done on the initial contaminated growth, sensitivity was 89% (95% CI 84-94) for tuberculosis and 95% (75-100) for rifampicin-resistance detection, and specificity was 95% (90-98) for tuberculosis and 98% (93-100) for rifampicin-resistance detection. If our approach were used the day after contamination detection, the time to tuberculosis detection would improve by a median of 23 days (IQR 13-45) and provide a result in many patients who had none. MPT64 TBc had a sensitivity of 5% (95% CI 0-25). INTERPRETATION: Ultra on AFB-negative growth from contaminated MGIT960 tubes had high sensitivity and specificity, approximating WHO criteria for sputum test target product performance and exceeding drug susceptibility testing. Our approach could mitigate negative effects of culture contamination, especially when repeat specimens are not submitted. FUNDING: The European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, National Institutes of Health.

Successful Anticoagulation With Warfarin After Switching From Rifampin to Rifabutin.

PURPOSE: A case of a patient receiving warfarin for pulmonary embolism (PE) concomitantly with rifampin for treatment of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is presented. A successful clinical intervention whereby the patient achieved therapeutic anticoagulation after switching to an alternative rifamycin antibacterial, rifabutin, is described. SUMMARY: The drug-drug interaction between warfarin and rifampin is well known and documented. However, to our knowledge, no case reports of the interaction between warfarin and rifabutin have been published, and literature describing this interaction is lacking. We describe the case of a 27-year-old African American female referred to a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic for treatment of PE with warfarin. The patient was also being treated for active tuberculosis with rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. Warfarin was initiated and over the course of 1 month was continuously increased to a total weekly dose (TWD) of 140 mg without ever achieving the target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 to 3. In an attempt to reach the target INR, rifampin was switched to rifabutin to minimize the drug-drug interaction with warfarin. Six days after this switch, the target INR was achieved with a lower warfarin TWD of 115 mg. Rifabutin interacts with warfarin to a lesser degree than rifampin and may be considered as an alternative in patients taking warfarin who require treatment with a rifamycin. CONCLUSION: For patients in whom therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin has been difficult, the use of rifabutin may be considered in place of rifampin when the concomitant use of a rifamycin is required.

Medicamentos para Tuberculosis Resistente/Latente ISSS / Medications for resistant/latent tuberculosis ISSS

INTRODUCCIÓN: El presente documento muestra el resultado de la evaluación de la solicitud de incorporación de los medicamentos Delamanid 50 mg tableta, Pretomanid 200 mg tabletas y Rifapentina 150 mg tabletas como parte de la terapia para Tuberculosis Multidrogorresistente (TB-MDR), Tuberculosis Extensamente Drogorrresistente (TB -XDR) y Tuberculosis Latente (ILTB). TECNOLOGÍA: Delamanid 50 mg tableta, Pretomanid 200 mg tabletas, Rifapentina 150 mg tabletas. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la incorporación de las tecnologías en el esquema de tratamiento de Tuberculosis Farmacorresistente y Tuberculosis Latente. OBJETIVO Evaluar la incorporación de las tecnologías en el esquema de tratamiento de Tuberculosis Farmacorresistente y Tuberculosis Latente. MÉTODOS: l. Verificación de disponibilidad local en la Dirección Nacional de Medicamentos (DNM). 2. Investigación en Agencias Reguladoras (AEMPS/EMA/FDA) para verificación de la indicación. 3. Informe Técnico Revisión de la evidencia científica/ Revisión de directrices de la Organización Mundial de la Salud OMS y Guías Clínicas del Ministerio de Salud de El Salvador (MINSAL). 4. Costos de los medicamentos. 5. Conclusiones 6. Recomendaciones. RESULTADOS: Se evaluó información científica disponible, como guías, lineamientos y Evaluaciones de Tecnología Sanitaria, de acuerdo a la evidencia científica disponible, los medicamentos solicitados se encuentran dentro de las directrices para el manejo de Tuberculosis Farmacorresistente y Tuberculosis Latente de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) y Ministerio de Salud de El Salvador (MINSAL). CONCLUSIONES: Actualmente, los medicamentos solicitados no están comercializados en el país, pero forman parte del Lista de Medicamentos Fondo Estratégico OPS Las Agencias Reguladoras consultadas muestran que los fármacos cuentan con autorización uso para las indicaciones solicitadas Así mismo, las directrices emitidas por la OMS, los fármacos Delamanid 50 mg tableta y Pretornanid 200 mg tabletas están aprobados para el tratamiento de tuberculosis Tuberculosis Multidrogorresistente (TB-MDR) y Tuberculosis Extensamente Drogorrresistente (TB -XDR) Según lo establecido por la OMS y por MINSAL, Rifapentina se puede utilizar como tratamiento preventivo en Tuberculosis Latente (ILTB), tanto en países de incidencia alta como incidencia baja.

[Evaluation of the performance of InnowaveDX MTB/RIF for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance].

Objective: To evaluate the performance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance mutation detection kit (InnowaveDX MTB/RIF, referred to as "InnowaveDX") in diagnosing tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance using sputum samples. Methods: From June 19, 2020 to May 16, 2022, patients with suspected tuberculosis were prospectively and consecutively enrolled in Hunan Provincial Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Institute, Henan Provincial Hospital of Infectious Diseases and Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital. A total of 1 328 patients with suspected tuberculosis were finally included. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1 035 pulmonary tuberculosis patients (357 were confirmed tuberculosis cases and 678 were clinically diagnosed tuberculosis cases) and 180 non-tuberculosis patients were finally included. Sputum samples were collected from all patients for routine sputum smear acid-fastness tests, mycobacterial culture and drug susceptibility testing. Moreover, the diagnostic value of Xpert®MTB/RIF (referred to as "Xpert") and InnowaveDXin detecting tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance was evaluated. Clinical diagnosis and culture results of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were used as reference standards to assess tuberculosis diagnosis, and phenotypic drug sensitivity and Xpert were used as reference standards to assess rifampicin resistance. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the two methods for tuberculosis diagnosis and rifampicin resistance were analyzed. The consistency of the two techniques was analyzed usingkappa test. Results: Taking clinical diagnosis as the reference standard, the detection sensitivity of InnowaveDX [58.0% (600/1 035)] was higher than that of Xpert [51.7% (535/1 035)] in 1035 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). In 270 pulmonary tuberculosis patients with culture-positive pulmonary tuberculosis identified as M.tuberculosis-complex, the positive rates of InnowaveDX and Xpert were both high [99.6%(269/270)and 98.2%(265/270), respectively] and there was no statistical difference. In culture-negative patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, the sensitivity of InnowaveDX was 38.8% (198/511), which was higher than that of Xpert (29.4%, 150/511), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Taking phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) as reference, the sensitivity of InnowaveDX to rifampicin resistance was 99.0% (95%CI: 94.7%-100.0%) and the specificity was 94.0%(95%CI: 88.5%-97.4%). With Xpert as the reference, the sensitivity and specificity of InnowaveDX were 97.1% (95%CI: 93.4%-99.1%) and 99.7% (95%CI: 98.4%-100.0%), respectively, and the kappa value was 0.97 (P<0.001). Conclusions: InnowaveDX show a high sensitivity for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, especially in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with a clinical diagnosis and negative culture results. It also showed high sensitivity in detecting rifampicin resistance with DST and Xpert as reference respectively. InnowaveDX is an early and accurate diagnostic tool for TB and drug-resistant TB, particularly suitable for application in low- and middle-income countries.