Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 4.721
1.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 38: 3946320241260633, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38836458

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibodies against the spike (S) and nucleocapsid (NP) proteins, as well as neutralizing antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD). Additionally, it aims to detect viral RNA of SARS-CoV-2 in pre-pandemic archival pediatric specimens collected before the announcement of the COVID-19 pandemic spread on March 20th, 2020, in Morocco. The objective is to investigate the existence of pre-pandemic immunity to SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study, to analyze IgG antibody levels in a cohort of 106 pre-pandemic pediatric participants. Using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), we measured the IgG levels against the S and NP proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, we staged a competitive ELISA assay to evaluate the neutralizing capability of these antibodies. We used reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) to detect viral NP and ORF1ab genes of SARS-CoV-2 in oropharyngeal swabs. Moreover, we conducted on the same specimens a multiplexed RT-PCR to detect RNA of the most common 27 pathogens involved in lower respiratory tract infections. RESULTS: Among the 106 serum samples, 13% (nn = =14) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies using ELISA. Temporal analysis indicated varying IgG positivity levels across 2019. Neutralizing antibodies were found in 21% of the 28 samples analyzed, including two with high inhibition rates (93%). The SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected using rRT-PCR in 14 samples. None of the samples tested positive for the other 27 pathogens associated with lower respiratory tract infections, using multiplexed RT-PCR. CONCLUSION: Our study addresses the possibility, that COVID-19 infections occurred in Morocco before the recognized outbreak. On the other hand, some of the cases might reflect cross-reactivity with other coronaviruses or be influenced by previous viral exposures or vaccinations. Understanding these factors is crucial to comprehending pediatric immune responses to newly emerging infectious diseases.


Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Child , Male , Female , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Child, Preschool , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Adolescent , Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins/immunology , RNA, Viral/blood , Fever/immunology , Fever/virology , Fever/diagnosis , Morocco/epidemiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Phosphoproteins
2.
Cancer Med ; 13(11): e7304, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826094

BACKGROUND: The surge in omicron variants has caused nationwide breakthrough infections in mainland China since the December 2022. In this study, we report the neutralization profiles of serum samples from the patients with breast cancer and the patients with liver cancer who had contracted subvariant breakthrough infections. METHODS: In this real-world study, we enrolled 143 COVID-19-vaccinated (81 and 62 patients with breast and liver cancers) and 105 unvaccinated patients with cancer (58 and 47 patients with breast and liver cancers) after omicron infection. Anti-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) IgGs and 50% pseudovirus neutralization titer (pVNT50) for the preceding (wild type), circulating omicron (BA.4-BA.5, and BF.7), and new subvariants (XBB.1.5) were comprehensively analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with liver cancer receiving booster doses had higher levels of anti-spike RBD IgG against circulating omicron (BA.4-BA.5, and BF.7) and a novel subvariant (XBB.1.5) compared to patients with breast cancer after breakthrough infection. Additionally, all vaccinated patients produced higher neutralizing antibody titers against circulating omicron (BA.4-BA.5, and BF.7) compared to unvaccinated patients. However, the unvaccinated patients produced higher neutralizing antibody against XBB.1.5 than vaccinated patients after Omicron infection, with this trend being more pronounced in breast cancer than in liver cancer patients. Moreover, we found that there was no correlation between anti-spike RBD IgG against wildtype virus and the neutralizing antibody titer, but a positive correlation between anti-spike RBD IgG and the neutralizing antibody against XBB.1.5 was found in unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSION: Our study found that there may be differences in vaccine response and protective effect against COVID-19 infection in patients with liver and breast cancer. Therefore, we recommend that COVID-19 vaccine strategies should be optimized based on vaccine components and immunology profiles of different patients with cancer.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Liver Neoplasms , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Liver Neoplasms/virology , Liver Neoplasms/immunology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/virology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , China/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Aged , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Male , Disease Outbreaks , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology
3.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1384417, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38726013

Nipah virus (NiV) poses a significant threat to human and livestock populations across South and Southeast Asia. Vaccines are required to reduce the risk and impact of spillover infection events. Pigs can act as an intermediate amplifying host for NiV and, separately, provide a preclinical model for evaluating human vaccine candidate immunogenicity. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the immunogenicity of an mRNA vectored NiV vaccine candidate in pigs. Pigs were immunized twice with 100 µg nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine encoding soluble G glycoprotein from the Malaysia strain of NiV, formulated in lipid nanoparticles. Potent antigen-binding and virus neutralizing antibodies were detected in serum following the booster immunization. Antibody responses effectively neutralized both the Malaysia and Bangladesh strains of NiV but showed limited neutralization of the related (about 80% amino acid sequence identity for G) Hendra virus. Antibodies were also capable of neutralizing NiV glycoprotein mediated cell-cell fusion. NiV G-specific T cell cytokine responses were also measurable following the booster immunization with evidence for induction of both CD4 and CD8 T cell responses. These data support the further evaluation of mRNA vectored NiV G as a vaccine for both pigs and humans.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Henipavirus Infections , Nipah Virus , Viral Vaccines , Animals , Nipah Virus/immunology , Nipah Virus/genetics , Swine , Henipavirus Infections/prevention & control , Henipavirus Infections/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Swine Diseases/immunology , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Swine Diseases/virology , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/immunology , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Immunization, Secondary , Cytokines/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Liposomes , Nanoparticles
4.
Med Microbiol Immunol ; 213(1): 6, 2024 May 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722338

To date, there is no licensed vaccine for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Therefore, MERS-CoV is one of the diseases targeted by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) vaccine development programs and has been classified as a priority disease by the World Health Organization (WHO). An important measure of vaccine immunogenicity and antibody functionality is the detection of virus-neutralizing antibodies. We have developed and optimized a microneutralization assay (MNA) using authentic MERS-CoV and standardized automatic counting of virus foci. Compared to our standard virus neutralization assay, the MNA showed improved sensitivity when analyzing 30 human sera with good correlation of results (Spearman's correlation coefficient r = 0.8917, p value < 0.0001). It is important to use standardized materials, such as the WHO international standard (IS) for anti-MERS-CoV immunoglobulin G, to compare the results from clinical trials worldwide. Therefore, in addition to the neutralizing titers (NT50 = 1384, NT80 = 384), we determined the IC50 and IC80 of WHO IS in our MNA to be 0.67 IU/ml and 2.6 IU/ml, respectively. Overall, the established MNA is well suited to reliably quantify vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies with high sensitivity.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , Neutralization Tests , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/immunology , Humans , Neutralization Tests/methods , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Animals , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(5): e13309, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725111

BACKGROUND: The newly emerged SARS-CoV-2 possesses shared antigenic epitopes with other human coronaviruses. We investigated if COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection may boost cross-reactive antibodies to other human coronaviruses. METHODS: Prevaccination and postvaccination sera from SARS-CoV-2 naïve healthy subjects who received three doses of the mRNA vaccine (BioNTech, BNT) or the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac, CV) were used to monitor the level of cross-reactive antibodies raised against other human coronaviruses by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In comparison, convalescent sera from COVID-19 patients with or without prior vaccination history were also tested. Pseudoparticle neutralization assay was performed to detect neutralization antibody against MERS-CoV. RESULTS: Among SARS-CoV-2 infection-naïve subjects, BNT or CV significantly increased the anti-S2 antibodies against Betacoronaviruses (OC43 and MERS-CoV) but not Alphacoronaviruses (229E). The prevaccination antibody response to the common cold human coronaviruses did not negatively impact the postvaccination antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. Cross-reactive antibodies that binds to the S2 protein of MERS-CoV were similarly detected from the convalescent sera of COVID-19 patients with or without vaccination history. However, these anti-S2 antibodies do not possess neutralizing activity in MERS-CoV pseudoparticle neutralization tests. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination may potentially modulate population immune landscape against previously exposed or novel human coronaviruses. The findings have implications for future sero-epidemiological studies on MERS-CoV.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Cross Reactions , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Cross Reactions/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Adult , Male , Female , Vaccination , Middle Aged , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Neutralization Tests , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/immunology , Young Adult , mRNA Vaccines/immunology
6.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 498-509, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695310

BACKGROUND: Vaccination remains the cornerstone of defense against COVID-19 globally. This study aims to assess the safety and immunogenicity profile of innovative vaccines LYB001. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial, in 100 healthy Chinese adults (21 to 72 years old). Three doses of 30 or 60 µg of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-based VLP vaccine (LYB001), or the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001, control group) were administered with a 28-day interval. Differences in the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and indicators of humoral and cellular immunity among the different groups were measured. RESULTS: No severe adverse events were confirmed to be vaccine-related, and there was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the LYB001 and control group or the age subgroups (p > 0.05). The LYB001 groups had significantly higher or comparable levels of seroconversion rates, neutralization antibody, S protein-binding antibody, and cellular immunity after whole vaccination than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that LYB001 developed on the VLP platform is safe and well tolerated with favorable immunogenicity for fundamental vaccination in healthy adults. Therefore, further larger-scale clinical studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05552573).


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Double-Blind Method , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Aged , Young Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Vaccines, Virus-Like Particle/immunology , Vaccines, Virus-Like Particle/adverse effects , Vaccines, Virus-Like Particle/administration & dosage , Immunity, Cellular , China , Immunity, Humoral , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/adverse effects , Vaccines, Subunit/administration & dosage , East Asian People
7.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1377014, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694512

Background: Acute immune responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are influenced by variants, vaccination, and clinical severity. Thus, the outcome of these responses may differ between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients and those with and without COVID-19-related pneumonia. In this study, these differences during infection with the Omicron variant were investigated. Methods: A total of 67 patients (including 47 vaccinated and 20 unvaccinated patients) who were hospitalized within 5 days after COVID-19 symptom onset were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Serum neutralizing activity was evaluated using a pseudotyped virus assay and serum cytokines and chemokines were measured. Circulating follicular helper T cell (cTfh) frequencies were evaluated using flow cytometry. Results: Twenty-five patients developed COVID-19 pneumonia on hospitalization. Although the neutralizing activities against wild-type and Delta variants were higher in the vaccinated group, those against the Omicron variant as well as the frequency of developing pneumonia were comparable between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. IL-6 and CXCL10 levels were higher in patients with pneumonia than in those without it, regardless of their vaccination status. Neutralizing activity against the Omicron variant were higher in vaccinated patients with pneumonia than in those without it. Moreover, a distinctive correlation between neutralizing activity against Omicron, IL-6 levels, and cTfh proportions was observed only in vaccinated patients. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the existence of a characteristic relationship between neutralizing activity against Omicron, IL-6 levels, and cTfh proportions in Omicron breakthrough infection.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Interleukin-6 , SARS-CoV-2 , T Follicular Helper Cells , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/blood , Male , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Female , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Interleukin-6/blood , Interleukin-6/immunology , Middle Aged , Aged , T Follicular Helper Cells/immunology , Prospective Studies , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Breakthrough Infections
8.
J Med Virol ; 96(5): e29640, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699969

After the termination of zero-COVID-19 policy, the populace in China has experienced both Omicron BA.5 and XBB waves. Considering the poor antibody responses and severe outcomes observed among the elderly following infection, we conducted a longitudinal investigation to examine the epidemiological characteristics and antibody kinetics among 107 boosted elderly participants following the Omicron BA.5 and XBB waves. We observed that 96 participants (89.7%) were infected with Omicron BA.5, while 59 (55.1%) participants were infected with Omicron XBB. Notably, 52 participants (48.6%) experienced dual infections of both Omicron BA.5 and XBB. The proportion of symptomatic cases appeared to decrease following the XBB wave (18.6%) compared to that after the BA.5 wave (59.3%). Omicron BA.5 breakthrough infection induced lower neutralizing antibody titers against XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1, while reinfection with Omicron XBB broadened the antibody responses against all measured Omicron subvariants and may alleviate the wild type-vaccination induced immune imprinting. Boosted vaccination type and comorbidities were the significant factors associated with antibody responses. Updated vaccines based on emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants are needed to control the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic in the elderly.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Breakthrough Infections , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Male , Female , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Vaccination
9.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(5): e13290, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706402

BACKGROUND: Priming with ChAdOx1 followed by heterologous boosting is considered in several countries. Nevertheless, analyses comparing the immunogenicity of heterologous booster to homologous primary vaccination regimens and natural infection are lacking. In this study, we aimed to conduct a comparative assessment of the immunogenicity between homologous primary vaccination regimens and heterologous prime-boost vaccination using BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. METHODS: We matched vaccinated naïve (VN) individuals (n = 673) with partial vaccination (n = 64), primary vaccination (n = 590), and primary series plus mRNA vaccine heterologous booster (n = 19) with unvaccinated naturally infected (NI) individuals with a documented primary SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 206). We measured the levels of neutralizing total antibodies (NTAbs), total antibodies (TAbs), anti-S-RBD IgG, and anti-S1 IgA titers. RESULTS: Homologous primary vaccination with ChAdOx1 not only showed less potent NTAb, TAb, anti-S-RBD IgG, and anti-S1 IgA immune responses compared to primary BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination regimens (p < 0.05) but also showed ~3-fold less anti-S1 IgA response compared to infection-induced immunity (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, a heterologous booster led to an increase of ~12 times in the immune response when compared to two consecutive homologous ChAdOx1 immunizations. Furthermore, correlation analyses revealed that both anti-S-RBD IgG and anti-S1 IgA significantly contributed to virus neutralization among NI individuals, particularly in symptomatic and pauci-symptomatic individuals, whereas among VN individuals, anti-S-RBD IgG was the main contributor to virus neutralization. CONCLUSION: The results emphasize the potential benefit of using heterologous mRNA boosters to increase antibody levels and neutralizing capacity particularly in patients who received primary vaccination with ChAdOx1.


2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Male , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Female , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/immunology , Middle Aged , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Vaccination , Aged , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Antibody Formation/immunology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/immunology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/administration & dosage , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
10.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1372193, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812507

Background: Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection has been somewhat limited due to the widespread dissemination of the Omicron variant, its subvariants, and the immune response dynamics of the naturally infected with the virus. Methods: Twelve subjects between 3-17 years old (yo), vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac®, were followed and diagnosed as breakthrough cases starting 14 days after receiving the second dose. Total IgGs against different SARS-CoV-2 proteins and the neutralizing capacity of these antibodies after infection were measured in plasma. The activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with peptides derived from the proteins from the wild-type (WT) virus and Omicron subvariants by flow cytometry, as well as different cytokines secretion by a Multiplex assay. Results: 2 to 8 weeks post-infection, compared to 4 weeks after 2nd dose of vaccine, there was a 146.5-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron and a 38.7-fold increase against WT SARS-CoV-2. Subjects showed an increase in total IgG levels against the S1, N, M, and NSP8 proteins of the WT virus. Activated CD4+ T cells showed a significant increase in response to the BA.2 subvariant (p<0.001). Finally, the secretion of IL-2 and IFN-γ cytokines showed a discreet decrease trend after infection in some subjects. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 infection in the pediatric population vaccinated with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine produced an increase in neutralizing antibodies against Omicron and increased specific IgG antibodies for different SARS-CoV-2 proteins. CD4+ T cell activation was also increased, suggesting a conserved cellular response against the Omicron subvariants, whereas Th1-type cytokine secretion tended to decrease. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov #NCT04992260.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cytokines/immunology , Cytokines/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination , Follow-Up Studies
11.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2808: 209-224, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743373

The plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are both widely used to assess immunity to infectious diseases such as measles, but they use two different measurement principles: ELISA measures the ability of antibodies to bind to virus components, while the PRNT detects the aptitude of antibodies to prevent the infection of a susceptible cell. As a result, detection of measles virus (MV) neutralizing antibodies is the gold standard for assessing immunity to measles. However, the assay is laborious and requires experience and excellent technical skills. In addition, the result is only available after several days. Therefore, the classical PRNT is not suitable for high-throughput testing. By using an immunocolorimetric assay (ICA) to detect MV-infected cells, the standard PRNT has been developed into a focus reduction neutralization test (FRNT). This assay is faster and has improved specificity. The FRNT described here is extremely useful when immunity to measles virus needs to be assessed in patients with a specific medical condition, such as immunocompromised individuals in whom presumed residual immunity needs to be assessed. The FRNT is not generally recommended for use with large numbers of specimens, such as in a seroprevalence study.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Measles virus , Measles , Neutralization Tests , Neutralization Tests/methods , Measles virus/immunology , Measles/immunology , Measles/diagnosis , Measles/virology , Humans , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Chlorocebus aethiops , Animals , Vero Cells , Viral Plaque Assay/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods
12.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10813, 2024 05 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734805

To evaluate the development of neutralizing Anti-Spike Protein IgG (Anti-S-IgG) during twin pregnancies before conception vs. during pregnancy. In this prospective study, three blood samples were collected from pregnant women and subjected to anti-S-IgG immunodiagnostics. The patient's medical records, including vaccination and PCR test results, were collected from the hospital's electronic database. Age-matched non-pregnant women were used as a control group. We enrolled 83 women with twin pregnancies. 49 women were vaccinated before conception, 21 women were vaccinated during pregnancy, and 13 were not vaccinated. Of the 13 women who weren't vaccinated, three became positive during pregnancy, and all three were severely ill. By contrast, in women who were vaccinated during or before pregnancy, COVID-19 infection during pregnancy caused only mild symptoms. A ten-fold lower level of neutralizing Anti-S-IgG in the 3rd trimester was observed in healthy women who were vaccinated before conception and remained healthy until discharge from the hospital after delivery 1605 (IQR: 763-2410) compared to the healthy women who were vaccinated during pregnancy 152 AU/mL (IQR: 54-360). This difference was higher among women who were infected by COVID-19 (as verified by a positive PCR test). The third-trimester level of neutralizing Ant-S-IgG in the infected group was 4770 AU/mL (4760-6100) in infected women vaccinated before conception compared to those vaccinated during pregnancy who had 70 AU/mL (IQR: 20-170) (p < 0.001). In women vaccinated at 13-16 weeks gestation, neutralizing Anti-S-IgG at 20-22 weeks went up to 372 AU/mL (IQR: 120-1598) but rapidly dropped to 112 AU/mL (IQR: 54-357) at 28-30 weeks, (p < 0.001), a faster decline than in women vaccinated at a median 22 weeks before conception. Being infected by COVID-19 before conception was linked to having low Anti-S-IgG levels during pregnancy, whereas being infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy led to a very high response in the 3rd trimester. In twin pregnancies, significantly lower neutralizing Anti-S-IgG levels were observed in women vaccinated during pregnancy compared to those vaccinated before conception, whether infected or not infected by COVID-19. A full course of vaccination before conception is recommended.Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: October 4, 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ID: NCT04595214.


COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunoglobulin G , Pregnancy, Twin , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Twin/immunology , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
13.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1385135, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756783

Background: The assessment of long-term humoral and cellular immunity post-vaccination is crucial for establishing an optimal vaccination strategy. Methods: This prospective cohort study evaluated adults (≥18 years) who received a BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine. We measured the anti-receptor binding domain immunoglobulin G antibody and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) against wild-type and Omicron subvariants (BA.5, BQ.1.1, BN.1, XBB.1 and EG.5) up to 9 months post-vaccination. T-cell immune responses were measured before and 4 weeks after vaccination. Results: A total of 108 (28 SARS-CoV-2-naïve and 80 previously infected) participants were enrolled. Anti-receptor binding domain immunoglobulin G (U/mL) levels were higher at 9 months post-vaccination than baseline in SAR-CoV-2-naïve individuals (8,339 vs. 1,834, p<0.001). NAb titers against BQ.1.1, BN.1, and XBB.1 were significantly higher at 9 months post-vaccination than baseline in both groups, whereas NAb against EG.5 was negligible at all time points. The T-cell immune response (median spot forming unit/106 cells) was highly cross-reactive at both baseline (wild-type/BA.5/XBB.1.5, 38.3/52.5/45.0 in SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals; 51.6/54.9/54.9 in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals) and 4 weeks post-vaccination, with insignificant boosting post-vaccination. Conclusion: Remarkable cross-reactive neutralization was observed against BQ.1.1, BN.1, and XBB.1 up to 9 months after BA.4/5 bivalent vaccination, but not against EG.5. The T-cell immune response was highly cross-reactive.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Humans , Male , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Female , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Adult , Prospective Studies , Aged , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology
14.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1390022, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698851

Purpose: Previous studies have demonstrated that the majority of patients with an inborn error of immunity (IEI) develop a spike (S)-specific IgG antibody and T-cell response after two doses of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine, but little is known about the response to a booster vaccination. We studied the immune responses 8 weeks after booster vaccination with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines in 171 IEI patients. Moreover, we evaluated the clinical outcomes in these patients one year after the start of the Dutch COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Methods: This study was embedded in a large prospective multicenter study investigating the immunogenicity of COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines in IEI (VACOPID study). Blood samples were taken from 244 participants 8 weeks after booster vaccination. These participants included 171 IEI patients (X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA;N=11), combined immunodeficiency (CID;N=4), common variable immunodeficiency (CVID;N=45), isolated or undefined antibody deficiencies (N=108) and phagocyte defects (N=3)) and 73 controls. SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG titers, neutralizing antibodies, and T-cell responses were evaluated. One year after the start of the COVID-19 vaccination program, 334 study participants (239 IEI patients and 95 controls) completed a questionnaire to supplement their clinical data focusing on SARS-CoV-2 infections. Results: After booster vaccination, S-specific IgG titers increased in all COVID-19 naive IEI cohorts and controls, when compared to titers at 6 months after the priming regimen. The fold-increases did not differ between controls and IEI cohorts. SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses also increased equally in all cohorts after booster vaccination compared to 6 months after the priming regimen. Most SARS-CoV-2 infections during the study period occurred in the period when the Omicron variant had become dominant. The clinical course of these infections was mild, although IEI patients experienced more frequent fever and dyspnea compared to controls and their symptoms persisted longer. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that mRNA-based booster vaccination induces robust recall of memory B-cell and T-cell responses in most IEI patients. One-year clinical follow-up demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 infections in IEI patients were mild. Given our results, we support booster campaigns with newer variant-specific COVID-19 booster vaccines to IEI patients with milder phenotypes.


Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Male , Female , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adult , Middle Aged , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/immunology , Follow-Up Studies , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Prospective Studies , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Young Adult , Vaccination , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/immunology , Adolescent
15.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3522-3528, 2024 May 31.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704251

BACKGROUND: The Recombinant Omicron BA.4/5-Delta COVID-19 Vaccine (ZF2202-A) is primarily designed for the Delta and Omicron BA.4/5 variants. Our objective was to assess the safety and immunogenicity of ZF2202-A in Chinese adults. METHODS: A total of 450 participants aged ≥ 18 years, who had completed primary or booster vaccination with a COVID-19 vaccine more than 6 months prior, were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial. Participants in the study and control groups were administered one dose of ZF2202-A and ZF2001, respectively. Immunogenicity subgroups were established in each group. RESULTS: At 14 days after vaccination, the seroconversion rates of Omicron BA.4/5, BF.7, and XBB.1 in the ZF2022-A group were 67.7 %, 58.6 %, and 62.6 %, with geometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies at 350.2, 491.8, and 49.5, respectively. The main adverse reactions (ARs) were vaccination site pain, pruritus, fatigue, and asthenia in both the ZF2022-A group and ZF2001 group. CONCLUSIONS: The novel bivalent vaccine ZF2202-A demonstrated satisfactory immunogenicity and safety against Omicron variants as booster dose in adults with prior vaccination of COVID-19 vaccines.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Synthetic , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Double-Blind Method , Middle Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , China , Young Adult , Immunization, Secondary/methods , Vaccination/methods , Aged , East Asian People
16.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 4081, 2024 May 14.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744844

Combination of waning immunity and lower effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 variants of approved COVID-19 vaccines necessitates new vaccines. We evaluated two doses, 28 days apart, of ARCT-154, a self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, compared with saline placebo in an integrated phase 1/2/3a/3b controlled, observer-blind trial in Vietnamese adults (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT05012943). Primary safety and reactogenicity outcomes were unsolicited adverse events (AE) 28 days after each dose, solicited local and systemic AE 7 days after each dose, and serious AEs throughout the study. Primary immunogenicity outcome was the immune response as neutralizing antibodies 28 days after the second dose. Efficacy against COVID-19 was assessed as primary and secondary outcomes in phase 3b. ARCT-154 was well tolerated with generally mild-moderate transient AEs. Four weeks after the second dose 94.1% (95% CI: 92.1-95.8) of vaccinees seroconverted for neutralizing antibodies, with a geometric mean-fold rise from baseline of 14.5 (95% CI: 13.6-15.5). Of 640 cases of confirmed COVID-19 eligible for efficacy analysis most were due to the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant. Efficacy of ARCT-154 was 56.6% (95% CI: 48.7- 63.3) against any COVID-19, and 95.3% (80.5-98.9) against severe COVID-19. ARCT-154 vaccination is well tolerated, immunogenic and efficacious, particularly against severe COVID-19 disease.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Female , Male , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Middle Aged , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Young Adult , Vaccine Efficacy , Vietnam , Adolescent , mRNA Vaccines , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11171, 2024 05 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750049

White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) have emerged as a reservoir host for SARS-CoV-2 given their susceptibility to infection and demonstrated high rates of seroprevalence and infection across the United States. As SARS-CoV-2 circulates within free-ranging white-tailed deer populations, there is the risk of transmission to other wildlife species and even back to the human population. The goal of this study was to determine the susceptibility, shedding, and immune response of North American elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) to experimental infection with SARS-CoV-2, to determine if another wide-ranging cervid species could potentially serve as a reservoir host for the virus. Here we demonstrate that while North American elk do not develop clinical signs of disease, they do develop a neutralizing antibody response to infection, suggesting the virus is capable of replicating in this mammalian host. Additionally, we demonstrate SARS-CoV-2 RNA presence in the medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes of infected elk three weeks after experimental infection. Consistent with previous observations in humans, these data may highlight a mechanism of viral persistence for SARS-CoV-2 in elk.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 , Deer , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Animals , Deer/virology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , COVID-19/virology , RNA, Viral/genetics , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Virus Shedding , Disease Reservoirs/virology , Female
18.
Vet Res ; 55(1): 65, 2024 May 21.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773540

In 2020, a new genotype of swine H1N2 influenza virus (H1avN2-HA 1C.2.4) was identified in France. It rapidly spread within the pig population and supplanted the previously predominant H1avN1-HA 1C.2.1 virus. To characterize this new genotype which is genetically and antigenically distant from the other H1avNx viruses detected in France, an experimental study was conducted to compare the outcomes of H1avN2 and H1avN1 infections in pigs and evaluate the protection conferred by the only inactivated vaccine currently licensed in Europe containing an HA 1C (clade 1C.2.2) antigen. Infection with H1avN2 induced stronger clinical signs and earlier shedding than H1avN1. The neutralizing antibodies produced following H1avN2 infection were unable to neutralize H1avN1, and vice versa, whereas the cellular-mediated immunity cross-reacted. Vaccination slightly altered the impact of H1avN2 infection at the clinical level, but did not prevent shedding of infectious virus particles. It induced a cellular-mediated immune response towards H1avN2, but did not produce neutralizing antibodies against this virus. As in vaccinated animals, animals previously infected by H1avN1 developed a cross-reacting cellular immune response but no neutralizing antibodies against H1avN2. However, H1avN1 pre-infection induced a better protection against the H1avN2 infection than vaccination, probably due to higher levels of non-neutralizing antibodies and a mucosal immunity. Altogether, these results showed that the new H1avN2 genotype induced a severe respiratory infection and that the actual vaccine was less effective against this H1avN2-HA 1C.2.4 than against H1avN1-HA 1C.2.1, which may have contributed to the H1avN2 epizootic and dissemination in pig farms in France.


Genotype , Influenza A Virus, H1N2 Subtype , Orthomyxoviridae Infections , Swine Diseases , Animals , Swine , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Diseases/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/virology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/immunology , France/epidemiology , Influenza A Virus, H1N2 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H1N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Virulence , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Immunity, Cellular
19.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1382619, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38779671

Introduction: Antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein are a critical immune determinant for protection against the virus. While virus neutralization is a key function of spike-specific antibodies, antibodies also mediate Fc-dependent activities that can play a role in protection or pathogenesis. Methods: This study characterized serum antibody responses elicited after two doses of heterologous adenovirus-vectored (Ad26/ Ad5) vaccines. Results: Vaccine-induced antibody binding titers and Fc-mediated functions decreased over six months, while neutralization titers remained stable. Comparison of antibody isotypes elicited after Ad26/Ad5 vs. LNP-mRNA vaccination and after infection showed that anti-spike IgG1 were dominant and produced to high levels in all groups. The Ad26/Ad5 vaccines also induced IgG4 but not IgG2 and IgG3, whereas the LNP-mRNA vaccines elicited a full Ig spectrum (IgM, IgG1-4, IgA1-2). Convalescent COVID-19 patients had mainly IgM and IgA1 alongside IgG1. Despite these differences, the neutralization potencies against early variants were similar. However, both vaccine groups had antibodies with greater Fc potencies of binding complement and Fcg receptors than the COVID-19 group. The Ad26/Ad5 group also displayed a greater potency of RBD-specific antibody-mediated cellular phagocytosis. Discussion: Antibodies with distinctive quality were induced by different vaccines and infection. The data imply the utility of different vaccine platforms to elicit antibody responses with fine-tuned Fc activities.


Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Female , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Male , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/immunology , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/genetics , Ad26COVS1/immunology , Adult , Middle Aged , Adenoviridae/immunology , Adenoviridae/genetics , Genetic Vectors , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , Immunoglobulin A/blood
20.
Ecohealth ; 21(1): 1-8, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748281

From July 2020 to June 2021, 248 wild house mice (Mus musculus), deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), brown rats (Rattus norvegicus), and black rats (Rattus rattus) from Texas and Washington, USA, and British Columbia, Canada, were tested for SARS-CoV-2 exposure and infection. Two brown rats and 11 house mice were positive for neutralizing antibodies using a surrogate virus neutralization test, but negative or indeterminate with the Multiplexed Fluorometric ImmunoAssay COVID-Plex, which targets full-length spike and nuclear proteins. Oro-nasopharyngeal swabs and fecal samples tested negative by RT-qPCR, with an indeterminate fecal sample in one house mouse. Continued surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wild rodents is warranted.


Animals, Wild , COVID-19 , Cities , Animals , Mice , Rats/virology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Animals, Wild/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Peromyscus/virology , Feces/virology , Rodent Diseases/virology , Rodent Diseases/epidemiology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood
...