Exploring the interplay of psychiatric symptoms, antipsychotic medications, side effects, employment status, and quality of life in Chronic Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Many factors contribute to quality of life (QoL) in patients with schizophrenia, yet limited research examined these factors in patients in China. This cross-sectional study explores subjective QoL and its associated factors in patients. METHODS: The QoL was assessed using the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS). Clinical symptoms were evaluated using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and seven factors were extracted. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) were used to assess depression and anxiety. Cognitive impairment was assessed using the Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8). The Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) and Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects (RSESE) were used to evaluate the side effects of medications. RESULTS: We recruited 270 patients (male:142,52.6%, mean age:41.9 ± 9.4 years). Positive correlations were observed between SQLS and its subdomains with the total score of BPRS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, AD8, TESS, and RSESE (all P < 0.005). Patients who were taking activating second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) had lower scores on total SQLS, Motivation/ Energy domain of SQLS (SQLS-ME) as well as Symptoms/ Side effects domain of SQLS (SQLS-SS) compared to those taking non-activating SGAs (all P < 0.005). Multiple regression analysis showed that depressive/ anxiety symptoms and cognitive impairment had significant negative effects on QoL (P ≤ 0.001), while activating SGAs had a positive effect (P < 0.005). Blunted affect and unemployment were inversely associated with the motivation/energy domain (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the important role of depression/anxiety symptoms and cognitive impairment in the QoL of patients with chronic schizophrenia. Activating SGAs and employment may improve the QoL of these individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This protocol was registered at chictr.org.cn (Identifier: ChiCTR2100043537).

Efficacy and tolerability of brexpiprazole - a new antipsychotic drug from the group of dopamine D2 receptor partial agonists. / Skutecznosc i tolerancja brekspiprazolu ­ nowego leku przeciwpsychotycznego z grupy czesciowych agonistów receptorów dopaminowych D2.

Brexpiprazole is a new antipsychotic drug from the group of dopamine D2/D3 receptor partial agonists. It represents a development of the second-generation antipsychotics and is an important addition to the pharmacological treatment options for schizophrenia. The purpose of this article is to present, illustrated by the case of brexpiprazole, how advances in the pharmacological properties of new antipsychotics translate into improved results in the treatment of schizophrenia, not only in terms of symptom reduction, but also in terms of functional improvement. The ratio of activation to blocking of the D2/D3 receptor is lower for brexpiprazole than for aripiprazole and cariprazine, which may translate into a lower risk of akathisia. Brexpiprazole has also stronger antihistaminic activity, which is likely to be associated with a stronger sedative effect, a lower risk of akathisia, excessive agitation and insomnia. Brexpiprazole meets the traditional requirements for an antipsychotic drug's efficacy, i.e., compared to placebo, it brings a greater reduction in schizophrenia symptoms in short-term studies and prevents schizophrenia relapses in long-term follow-up. The highest antipsychotic efficacy was found with the highest registered dose (4 mg/day). In addition to reducing positive symptoms, brexpiprazole treatment also leads to a reduction in negative and depressive symptoms, as well as anxiety. It has also a positive effect on patients' social and personal functioning and quality of life. This action of the drug is in line with the expectations of patients and their families regarding effective treatment. It should not only reduce symptoms, but also enable a return to health, i.e., a state that, in addition to optimal health and a sense of psychological well-being, also makes it possible to maintain proper social relations.

A Long-Term Safety and Tolerability Study of TV-46000 for Subcutaneous Use in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: TV-46000 is a long-acting subcutaneous antipsychotic (LASCA) formulation of risperidone that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. In the phase 3, randomized, double-blind RIsperidone Subcutaneous Extended-release (RISE) study, TV-46000 once monthly (q1m) and once every 2 months (q2m) significantly prolonged time to impending relapse compared with placebo [5.0-fold (q1m) and 2.7-fold (q2m)]. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind Safety in Humans of TV-46000 subcutaneous INjection Evaluation (SHINE) study was designed to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and exposure of TV-46000 in schizophrenia. METHODS: Patients who completed RISE without relapse (rollover) or who were newly recruited (de novo) were eligible for the SHINE study. Patients were initially stabilized on oral risperidone for 12 weeks (completed in RISE for rollover, or in SHINE for de novo). Patients in the de novo cohort and patients who received placebo in RISE were randomized 1:1 in SHINE to receive TV-46000 q1m or q2m for up to 56 weeks. Primary endpoint for SHINE was frequency of reported adverse events (AEs); event rates [ER; events per 100 patient-years (PYs)] were calculated for each AE by patients upon general questioning. RESULTS: Overall, 336 patients were randomized in SHINE [TV-46000 q1m, n = 174; TV-46000 q2m, n = 162; of these, de novo, n = 109 and rollover, n = 227 (n = 172 patients were treated and n = 55 received placebo)]. A total of 334 patients were evaluated for safety [q1m, n = 172 (PY = 97.8); q2m, n = 162 (PY = 104.5)]. Proportions of patients (ER) with ≥ 1 AE and ≥ 1 treatment-related AE were 37% (180.0) and 21% (84.9) for TV-46000 q1m and 46% (157.9) and 20% (70.8) for TV-46000 q2m, respectively. Frequent treatment-related AEs [≥ 3% of patients in either group; proportion of patients (ER)] were injection site pain [q1m, 5% (24.5); q2m, 4% (22.0)] and injection site nodule [q1m, 2% (9.2); q2m, 6% (12.4)]. The proportions of patients with serious AEs was 5% for TV-46000 q1m and 7% for TV-46000 q2m; serious AEs reported for ≥ 2 patients overall were worsening schizophrenia [q1m, n = 1 (< 1%; ER, 1.02); q2m, n = 2 (1%; ER, 1.91)] and hyperglycemia [q1m, n = 1 (< 1%; ER, 1.02); q2m, n = 1 (< 1%; ER, 0.96)]. Of three reported deaths, none were related to treatment. Overall, eight patients discontinued treatment because of AEs. Similar or somewhat lower rates of AEs were reported for patients who rolled over from TV-46000 treatment compared with those who had no prior TV-46000 treatment (de novo and placebo rollover). Most AEs related to injection site reactions were mild; no patient had a severe reaction. CONCLUSION: Results from this long-term safety study add to the favorable safety profiles of TV-46000 q1m and q2m, consistent with other formulations of risperidone and previous studies with TV-46000. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03893825; 27 March 2019.

The United States Food and Drug Administration approved TV-46000 in April 2023 for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. TV-46000 is a long-acting subcutaneous antipsychotic (LASCA) that uses technology that allows for the slow release of risperidone. TV-46000 is injected under the skin once monthly or once every 2 months. When people start taking TV-46000, they do not need an additional injection or oral risperidone. The Safety in Humans of TV-46000 subcutaneous INjection Evaluation (SHINE) was a clinical study in which patients with schizophrenia received TV-46000. SHINE was conducted in patients who completed the RIsperidone Subcutaneous Extended-release (RISE) study and new patients. All patients (TV-46000 once monthly, n = 162; TV-46000 once every 2 months, n = 172) received TV-46000 in SHINE to see whether safety results were the same long term compared with RISE. The proportions with more than one adverse event were 37% for TV-46000 once monthly and 46% for TV-46000 once every 2 months. The proportions with more than one adverse event related to treatment were 21% for TV-46000 once monthly and 20% for TV-46000 once every 2 months. Common adverse events related to treatment were injection site pain and small swelling. Serious adverse events were rare. None of the three reported deaths were related to treatment. Similar or lower rates of adverse events were reported for those who received TV-46000 in RISE compared with those with no prior TV-46000 treatment. The long-term safety results in SHINE were consistent with other forms of risperidone and previous studies with TV-46000.

Analysis of antipsychotic drugs prescribing in incarcerated persons in a Serbian correctional facility.

PURPOSE: Prison settings have limited resources, and it is of particular interest to analyze which antipsychotics are commonly prescribed in these conditions and to determine the prevalence of the adverse effects. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A cross-sectional, epidemiological survey was used to measure the prevalence of antipsychotic prescribing among adult prisoners in Sremska Mitrovica Prison in 2020. FINDINGS: The prevalence of antipsychotic use was 7.58%. The most commonly prescribed antipsychotic was clozapine (45.36%), but also olanzapine, haloperidol and risperidone were prescribed. The incidence of extrapyramidal adverse effects was nonexistent and the metabolic parameters did not differ between participants using metabolic syndrome-inducing antipsychotics and those who were prescribed metabolically inert medications. The prescribed doses were lower compared with the recommended. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This research includes certain points that should be cautiously considered. First, the data were cross-sectional and the findings did not provide causal interpretations. Second, the data are from a single penitentiary institution, albeit the largest in the country; however, that may affect the generalizability of the findings. Third, because the included subjects were not hospitalized, some laboratory analyses were not available, according to the local regulations, and thus the prevalence of metabolic syndrome could not be precisely determined. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The prevalence of the antipsychotic use in prison environment is significantly higher than in general population. The most frequently prescribed antipsychotics are clozapine and olanzapine. The prevalence of adverse effects is rare, however, that is possibly due to low doses of the prescribed antipsychotics. The list of therapeutic options available to the incarcerated persons in this facility is also limited. The list of available antipsychotics does not include some atypical antipsychotics with more favorable safety and tolerability profile, such as aripiprazole or cariprazine. Long-acting antipsychotic injectables were also not available to these patients. Laboratory analyses are not regularly conducted and do not include some essential parameters such as lipid status or differential blood count. Low-dose antipsychotics for behavioral symptoms appears to be well tolerated under prison conditions where adherence is assured. It is effective during the prison stay but long-term effects, especially after release from prison, had not been studied. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: This paper advocates for better quality of health care in this correctional facility: more therapeutic options and better laboratory monitoring. The authors justify the use of clozapine in this settings due its benefits in reducing violence and aggression; however, further research would be necessary to clarify does the use of clozapine in incarcerated persons cause behavioral improvements that could result in shorter incarcerations, less recidivism and better quality of life. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first insight of the antipsychotic prescribing practice in Serbia. There is very limited data on prisoners' health care, especially mental health care, in Balkan countries. The antipsychotic prescribing pattern in this sample is characterized with higher than expected clozapine use, but without expected adverse effects.

Haloperidol (oral) versus olanzapine (oral) for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is often a severe and disabling psychiatric disorder. Antipsychotics remain the mainstay of psychotropic treatment for people with psychosis. In limited resource and humanitarian contexts, it is key to have several options for beneficial, low-cost antipsychotics, which require minimal monitoring. We wanted to compare oral haloperidol, as one of the most available antipsychotics in these settings, with a second-generation antipsychotic, olanzapine. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical benefits and harms of haloperidol compared to olanzapine for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia study-based register of trials, which is based on monthly searches of CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, ISRCTN, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed and WHO ICTRP. We screened the references of all included studies. We contacted relevant authors of trials for additional information where clarification was required or where data were incomplete. The register was last searched on 14 January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing haloperidol with olanzapine for people with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Our main outcomes of interest were clinically important change in global state, relapse, clinically important change in mental state, extrapyramidal side effects, weight increase, clinically important change in quality of life and leaving the study early due to adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently evaluated and extracted data. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial or harmful outcome (NNTB or NNTH) with 95% CI. For continuous data, we estimated mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs. For all included studies, we assessed risk of bias (RoB 1) and we used the GRADE approach to create a summary of findings table. MAIN RESULTS: We included 68 studies randomising 9132 participants. We are very uncertain whether there is a difference between haloperidol and olanzapine in clinically important change in global state (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.02; 6 studies, 3078 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain whether there is a difference between haloperidol and olanzapine in relapse (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.02; 7 studies, 1499 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Haloperidol may reduce the incidence of clinically important change in overall mental state compared to olanzapine (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81; 13 studies, 1210 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every eight people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience this improvement. The evidence suggests that haloperidol may result in a large increase in extrapyramidal side effects compared to olanzapine (RR 3.38, 95% CI 2.28 to 5.02; 14 studies, 3290 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every three people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one additional person would experience extrapyramidal side effects. For weight gain, the evidence suggests that there may be a large reduction in the risk with haloperidol compared to olanzapine (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.61; 18 studies, 4302 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every 10 people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience weight increase. A single study suggests that haloperidol may reduce the incidence of clinically important change in quality of life compared to olanzapine (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91; 828 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every nine people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience clinically important improvement in quality of life. Haloperidol may result in an increase in the incidence of leaving the study early due to adverse effects compared to olanzapine (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.47; 21 studies, 5047 participants; low-certainty evidence). For every 22 people treated with haloperidol instead of olanzapine, one fewer person would experience this outcome. Thirty otherwise relevant studies and several endpoints from 14 included studies could not be evaluated due to inconsistencies and poor transparency of several parameters. Furthermore, even within studies that were included, it was often not possible to use data for the same reasons. Risk of bias differed substantially for different outcomes and the certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to low. The most common risks of bias leading to downgrading of the evidence were blinding (performance bias) and selective reporting (reporting bias). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the certainty of the evidence was low to very low for the main outcomes in this review, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions. We are very uncertain whether there is a difference between haloperidol and olanzapine in terms of clinically important global state and relapse. Olanzapine may result in a slightly greater overall clinically important change in mental state and in a clinically important change in quality of life. Different side effect profiles were noted: haloperidol may result in a large increase in extrapyramidal side effects and olanzapine in a large increase in weight gain. The drug of choice needs to take into account side effect profiles and the preferences of the individual. These findings and the recent inclusion of olanzapine alongside haloperidol in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines should increase the likelihood of it becoming more easily available in low- and middle- income countries, thereby improving choice and providing a greater ability to respond to side effects for people with lived experience of schizophrenia. There is a need for additional research using appropriate and equivalent dosages of these drugs. Some of this research needs to be done in low- and middle-income settings and should actively seek to account for factors relevant to these. Research on antipsychotics needs to be person-centred and prioritise factors that are of interest to people with lived experience of schizophrenia.

Comparative efficacy and safety of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of psychiatric and behavioral symptoms of Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Olanzapine and risperidone have emerged as the most widely used drugs as short-term prescription in the treatment of behavioral disturbances in dementia. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was hence performed to investigate the effectiveness and safety profile of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), aiming to provide updated suggestion for clinical physicians and caregivers. DESIGN: Prospective controlled clinical studies were included, of which available data was extracted. Outcomes of BEHAVE-AD scores with the variation of grades, specific behaviors variables, as well as safety signals were pooled for the analysis by odds rates and weighted mean differences, respectively. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Prospective, controlled clinical studies, conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety profile of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of BPSD. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Interested data including baseline characteristics and necessary outcomes from the included studies were extracted independently by 2 investigators. BEHAVE-AD scale was adopted to assess the efficacy in the present study. All behaviors were evaluated at the time of the initiation of the treatment, as well as the completion of drugs courses. Adverse events were assessed with the criteria of Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale, or Coding Symbols for a Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction Terms dictionary. Weighted mean difference was used for the pooled analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2427 participants were included in the present meta-analysis. Comparative OR on response rate, and remarkable response rate between olanzapine and risperidone was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.51-0.84; P = .0008), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.50-0.78; P < .0001), respectively. There were statistical differences observed by olanzapine on the improvement of variables including delusions (WMD, -1.83, 95% CI, -3.20, -0.47), and nighttime behavior disturbances (WMD, -1.99, 95% CI, -3.60, -0.38) when compared to risperidone. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that olanzapine might be statistically superior to risperidone on the reduction of BPSD of Alzheimer's disease, especially in the relief of delusions and nighttime behavior disturbances. In addition, olanzapine was shown statistically lower risks of agitation, sleep disturbance, and extrapyramidal signs.

Anismus-A Very Unusual Extrapyramidal Side Effect of Paliperidone Palmitate in an Adolescent with Schizo-Affective Disorder.

Here, authors report on an interesting case of an adolescent with a diagnosis of schizo-affective disorder, maintained on LAI paliperidone palmitate that developed an unusual dystonic reaction in form of anismus that masquerade as constipation and faecal impaction. To our knowledge, this is one of the earliest reports of antipsychotic-induced anismus notably in adolescent population. Clinicians should be mindful of unusual forms of dyskinesias that might be associated with high-potency antipsychotic use.

Rash caused by lurasidone in old chinese patient with bipolar disorder: case-based review.

BACKGROUND: Rash is one of common adverse drug reaction and which have been reported in typical and atypical antipsychotics. Reports of lurasidone induced skin reactions are sparse. In this study, we report a case of rash caused by lurasidone. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old man with bipolar disorder (BD) who is treated by lurasidone. However, the patient presents a rash all over after lurasidone dose increasing from 40 mg/day to 60 mg/day. With the diagnosis of drug induced rash, lurasidone was discontinued, and the rash complete disappears within 2 weeks. In addition, all case reports about antipsychotics associated rash were reviewed by searching English and Chinese database including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang database. A total of 139 articles contained 172 patients were included in our study. The literature review and our case suggest that the cutaneous adverse events caused by antipsychotic drugs should not be ignored, particularly for the patient who was first use or at dose increasing of antipsychotic. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we report a case of lurasidone related rash and review rash caused by antipsychotics. Psychiatrists should be alert to the possibility of the rash caused by antipsychotics, especially the patient was first use of antipsychotics or the antipsychotic dose was increasing.

Effect of long-term use of antipsychotics on the ventricular repolarization index.

BACKGROUND: The risk of arrhythmia is usually assessed by the length of the corrected QT interval (QTc) when patients use antipsychotics. Prolonged QTc intervals are thought to increase the probability of malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and if we focus only on the QTc interval, we may be influenced by a single factor and make decisions that are not conducive to effective treatment. The index of cardiac electrophysiological balance (iCEB) is considered more valuable than the QTc for predicting drug-induced arrhythmias. It has been used in clinical practice, but no studies have observed changes in this index after the use of antipsychotics. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes in ventricular repolarization indices and the occurrence of arrhythmias in patients who have been using antipsychotic drugs for a long time, to compare the changes in iCEBc and QTc and to predict abnormal iCEBc values. METHODS: Patients with schizophrenia who had been hospitalized for more than 4 years and who were receiving atypical antipsychotics underwent a 12-lead synchronized electrocardiogram (ECG) every 2-4 weeks. The baseline data were measured at admission, defined as the baseline (time0), and the most obvious abnormal changes in ventricular depolarization and repolarization measured every 12 months were one-year follow-up (time1), two-year follow-up (time2), three-year follow-up (time3), and four-year follow-up (time4). Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for comparisons. The types and doses of drugs taken at 5 time points were recorded and converted into chlorpromazine equivalents for comparison. The incidence of arrhythmia during the observation cycle was recorded. RESULTS: The patients had been treated with antipsychotic medication for 4 years, and the duration of the QRS wave was longer in males than in females. TpTe, TpTe/QRS, TpTe/QT, TpTe/QTc, iCEB, and iCEBc increased significantly with hospital stay, while TpTe, TpTe/QRS, TpTe/QT, and TpTe/QTc exhibited more obvious changes in these indicators in female patients (P < 0.01). The changes in iCEB and iCEBc were more significant in males (P < 0.01). The incidences of arrhythmia (arrhythmic events included premature ventricular beats and premature atrial beats) within 5 time points were 2.5%, 6.25%, 6.25%, 6.25% and 5%, respectively. More than 90% of patients treated with antipsychotics did not have any arrhythmias. No TdP syncope or other cardiovascular symptoms were found in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: After long-term use of antipsychotics, the ventricular repolarization index gradually increased with time. The new ventricular repolarization indices iCEB and iCEBc were more sensitive than the QTc at predicting arrhythmia. According to the abnormal QTc values in men and women, we predict that the abnormal value of the iCEBc in males is 4.528 and that in females is 5.315.

Ocular toxicity of psychotropic medications in a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the ocular toxicity of the psychotropic drugs used by patients and to proffer suggestions on how to prevent visual impairment or blindness in patients on antipsychotics. Methodology: This was a prospective, hospital-based cross-sectional study. Participants were adult patients between 18 and 70 years, diagnosed with psychosis, and who had been on antipsychotic medications for at least one year. All the recruited participants had an examination of the anterior and posterior segments of the eyes done. Schirmer's test, Tear film Break-up time (TBUT), Central Corneal thickness (CCT), Colour vision test, and Contrast sensitivity test were done. The collected data was analyzed using IBM SPSS 28.0. Results: The study enrolled patients who were mainly females (55.1%). The highest age group of the cases was 29-38 years (29.7%). The examination of the eyes and investigations revealed that 10.2% of the respondents on antipsychotics had color vision deficiency and 25.4% - loss of contrast sensitivity. Lid pigmentation was observed in 20.3% and cataract in 32.2%. Degeneration of the peripheral retina was observed in 4.2% of patients on antipsychotic medication. Schirmer's test showed mild, moderate, and severe dry eyes in 11%,17.8%, and 20.3% of the participants respectively. The test for Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) showed 50.0% of the respondents had a thin cornea and 24.6% had a thick cornea. 17.8% of the surveyed respondents manifested high eye pressure. Discussion: Psychotropics are the gold standard for the treatment of psychotic episodes and disorders. The choice of drug, dosing, and mode of administration depends on the severity of the psychotic disorder. Higher doses of psychotropics were reported to cause toxicity in different organs in the body including the eyes, especially on long-term use and high dosage and this can affect the quality of life of the individual negatively. Conclusion: The earliest and most prominent side effect seen in patients on psychotic medication was dry eyes. There were a few cases of blinding eye diseases like glaucoma, and cataract. For these reasons, ophthalmic assessments should be included as part of the management of psychiatric patients early at the start of antipsychotic treatment. Abbreviations: FGA = First Generation Antipsychotics, SGA = Second Generation Antipsychotics, TCAs = Tricyclic Antidepressants, CCT = Central Corneal Thickness, IOP = Intraocular Pressure, TBUT =Tear film Break-up Time, BIO = Binocular Indirect Ophthalmoscope.

Comparative analysis of psychiatric medications and their association with falls and fractures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

An association between psychiatric medications and falls and fractures in people taking them has been demonstrated, but which class or medication leads to the greatest risk of falls or fractures should be further investigated. The aim of this study was to compare and rank the magnitude of risk of falls and fractures due to different psychiatric medications. Eight databases were searched for this meta-analysis and evaluated using a frequency-based network meta-analysis. The results included a total of 28 papers with 14 medications from 5 major classes, involving 3,467,314 patients. The results showed that atypical antipsychotics were the class of medications with the highest risk of falls, and typical antipsychotics were the class of medications with the highest risk of resulting in fractures. Quetiapine ranked first in the category of 13 medications associated with risk of falls, and class Z drugs ranked first in the category of 6 medications associated with risk of fractures. The available evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotics and typical antipsychotics may be the drugs with the highest risk of falls and fractures, respectively. Quetiapine may be the medication with the highest risk of falls, and class Z drugs may be the medication with the highest risk of fractures.

Investigating the link between antipsychotic use and post-stroke infections in older people: multi-centre propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: The risk of stroke increases with age, and although previous reports have suggested that infection risk may increase with antipsychotic use, relevant studies after stroke are scarce. We aimed to investigate whether antipsychotics increase post-stroke infection risk in the acute stroke period. METHODS: This propensity score matching study included adults diagnosed with first-ever stroke between 2011 and 2020 at five university hospitals. In-hospital antipsychotic exposure was defined as any administration during hospitalisation for stroke. The primary outcome was post-stroke infection after the first 2 days of hospitalisation, and the secondary outcome was the presence of pneumonia, bacteraemia and/or bacteriuria. RESULT: Among 23,885 first-ever stroke patients, 2,773 antipsychotic users (age 71.6 ± 12.4, male 54.6%) and 2,773 non-users (age 71.2 ± 13.2, male 54.6%) were selected as matched cohorts. After adjusting for propensity score, antipsychotics were not associated with an increased risk of post-stroke infection (odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.14). CONCLUSION: While our study did not find conclusive evidence linking antipsychotic medication to an increased risk of post-stroke infection, prescribing these medications should still be approached with prudence. Until further research can provide more definitive insights, clinicians should carefully weigh the potential infection risks when considering antipsychotic treatment during the acute stroke care period.

Effects of electroacupuncture combined with paliperidone palmitate long-acting injection on withdrawal symptoms and neurotransmitters in methamphetamine addicts.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of electroacupuncture combined with paliperidone palmitate long-acting injection (PP-LAI) on withdrawal symptoms and neurotransmitters in methamphetamine (MA) addicts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 109 methamphetamine addicts, who were treated in the hospital from October 2021 to October 2022, were selected. According to the random number table, the patients were divided into the study group (n=54) and the control group (n=55), in which the control group was treated with PP-LAI and the study group was treated with electroacupuncture on the basis of the control group; the methamphetamine withdrawal symptom score scale was used to assess the therapeutic effect before treatment and within 12 months after treatment; the changes of brain neurotransmitters dopamine, γ-aminobutyric acid, serotonin, acetylcholine values were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: 1) There was no statistical difference in MA withdrawal symptom scores between the two groups before treatment (p>0.05); 2) MA withdrawal symptom scores have a statistically significant difference between the study group and the control group after 3 and 6 months of treatment; 3) dopamine levels in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group after 6 months of completion of treatment, and γ-aminobutyric acid values and 5- serotonin values in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Electroacupuncture combined with PP-LAI can partially improve the withdrawal symptoms and anxiety of methamphetamine addicts. This is a potential treatment for preventing relapse of withdrawal symptoms.

Analysis of Antipsychotic Dosage in Patients With Tardive Dyskinesia: A Case-Control Study Using the Claims Database of the Corporate Health Insurance Association.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the association between antipsychotic doses and the risk of tardive dyskinesia (TD) in clinical practice using a Japanese claims database from 2010 to 2020. METHODS: The study population included patients 15 years or older with a diagnosis record of schizophrenia, depression, or bipolar disorder who were prescribed antipsychotics. Using a case-control design, we categorized patients newly diagnosed with TD as cases, with corresponding 1:10 matching in the control group. The primary endpoint was the relative risk of TD in the >median dose and ≤median dose groups, as determined using conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for age. RESULTS: The analysis population included 58,452 patients, and the median daily antipsychotic dose was 75 mg/d of chlorpromazine equivalent (CPZE). Of these, 80 were identified as TD cases, and doses >75 mg/d were associated with a significantly increased risk of TD at the last prescription and the maximum dose, respectively, before the date of the first diagnosis of TD. Post-hoc analysis further showed a significant association between doses ≥300 mg/d and the risk of TD compared to doses ≤75 mg/d and doses >75 to <300 mg/d. Comparing ≥300 mg/d versus >75 to <300 mg/d, the odd ratios at the last prescription and maximum dose before the first diagnosis of TD were 3.40 and 3.50, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the Japanese medical claims database of patients receiving relatively low doses of antipsychotics, doses >75 mg/d were associated with an increased risk of TD in a dose-dependent manner.