Appropriateness of care in complex fenestrated-branched aortic endografting.

Fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms is increasingly replacing open repair as the primary modality of treatment. Mid- and long-term results are encouraging and support its use in the correct settings. Nevertheless, appropriateness of indication for treatment, patient selection, and surgeon and hospital performance has not been clearly evaluated and reviewed. The objective of this review article was to identify areas in which appropriateness of care is relevant and can be optimized when considering treatment of patients with fenestrated and branched endovascular repair for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Infective native arterial aneurysms and inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms: An overview with a focus on emergency settings.

Infective native arterial aneurysms and inflammatory aortic aneurysms are rare but morbid pathologies seen by vascular surgeons in the emergency setting. Presentation is not always clear, and a full workup must be obtained before adopting a management strategy. Treatment is multidisciplinary and is tailored to every case based on workup findings. Imaging with computed tomography, magnetic resonance, or with fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography aids in diagnosis and in monitoring response to treatment. Open surgery is traditionally performed for definitive management. Endovascular surgery may offer an alternative treatment in select cases with acceptable outcomes. Neither technique has been proven to be superior to the other. Physicians should consider patient's anatomy, comorbidities, life expectancy, and goals of care before selecting an approach. Long-term pharmacological treatment, with antibiotics in case of infective aneurysms and immunosuppressants in case of inflammatory aneurysms, is usually required and should be managed in collaboration with infectious disease specialists and rheumatologists.

Appropriate management of the small abdominal aortic aneurysm.

There is variation in the management of small aneurysms in the United States today, with some surgeons moving forward with elective repair and others practice ongoing surveillance. Literature exists to suggest that small aneurysms are repaired at a higher rate than should be considered acceptable, and this represents a deviation from current standards of care. To best understand the optimal care of this patient population, this article aims to evaluate the current management of small aneurysms, review contemporary guidelines and the literature behind them, and assess the appropriateness of surgical management of small aneurysms.

Abdominal aneurysm sac thrombus CT density and volume after EVAR: which association with underlying endoleak?

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to analyse abdominal aneurysm sac thrombus density and volume on computed tomography (CT) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Patients who underwent EVAR between January 2005 and December 2010 and had at least four follow-up CT exams available over the first five years of follow-up were included in this retrospective single-centre study. Thrombus density and aneurysm sac volume were calculated on unenhanced CT scans. Linear mixed models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Out of 82 patients, 44 (54%) had an endoleak on post-EVAR contrast-enhanced CT. Thrombus density significantly increased over time in both the endoleak and non-endoleak groups, with a slope of 0.159 UH/month (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.115-0.202), p < 0.0001) and 0.052 UH/month (95% CI 0.002-0.102, p = 0.041). In patients without endoleak, a significant decrease in aneurysm sac volume was identified over time (slope -0.891 cc/month, 95% CI -1.200 to -0.581); p < 0.001) compared to patients with endoleak (slope 0.284 cc/month, 95% CI -0.031 to 0.523, p = 0.082). The association between thrombus density and aneurysm sac volume was positive in the endoleak group (slope 1.543 UH/cc, 95% CI 0.948-2.138, p < 0.001) and negative in the non-endoleak group (slope -1.450 UH/cc, 95% CI -2.326 to -0.574, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We observed a progressive increase in thrombus density of the aneurysm sac after EVAR in patients with and without endoleak, more pronounced in patients with endoleak. The association between aneurysm volume and thrombus density was positive in patients with and negative in those without endoleak. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A progressive increase in thrombus density and volume of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac on unenhanced CT might suggest underlying endoleak lately after EVAR. KEY POINTS: Thrombus density of the aneurysm sac after EVAR increased over time. Progressive increase in thrombus density was significantly associated to the underlying endoleak. The association between aneurysm volume and thrombus density was positive in patients with and negative in those without endoleak.

Ruptured AAA: bridging the gap between international guidelines and local clinical realities.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of asymptomatic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) presents a clinical challenge, requiring a delicate balance between rupture risk, patient comorbidities, and intervention-related complications. International guidelines recommend intervention for specific AAA size thresholds, but these are based on historical trials with limited female representation. We aimed to analyse disease characteristics, AAA size at rupture, and intervention outcomes in patients with ruptured AAA from 2009 to 2023 to investigate the gap between guidelines and local realities. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective cohort study analysed electronic health records of patients treated for a ruptured AAA, excluding those who were managed palliatively. The study assessed patients' demographics, risk factors, comorbidities, clinical presentation, radiological characteristics, and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 164 patients (41 females, 123 males, median age 73.5), 93.3% presented with abdominal or back pain. The median AAA size at rupture was 8.0 cm in males and 7.6 cm in females. No significant correlations were found between demographic characteristics, risk factors, AAA size, repair modality, and outcomes. Trends show a decline in AAA prevalence and rupture rates, aligning with global health initiatives. Post-intervention survival rates at 30 days were 70.7% (67.5% in males and 80.0% in females), and at 2 years were 65.85% (61.7% in males and 70.0% in females). CONCLUSION: Evolving AAA trends and improved post-intervention survival rates warrant a critical reassessment of existing intervention recommendations. Adjusting intervention thresholds to larger sizes may be justified to optimise the risk-benefit ratio.

Jejunal ischaemia following inferior mesenteric artery angioembolisation for type 2 endoleak.

We present a rare case of short-segment jejunal infarction following inferior mesenteric artery embolisation for type 2 endoleak in a patient who previously underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Potential causes for the event might include thromboembolism or traumatic thrombosis of a jejunal branch of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) caused by a buddy guide wire used to maintain the position of the long vascular sheath in the SMA hiatus. The condition was recognised on CT and treated with resection of the infarcted segment of the small bowel followed by primary anastomosis.

Spontaneous Rupture of Abdominal Aorta Pseudoaneurysm: a Case Report.

Pseudoaneurysms are false aneurysms that mostly occur at the site of arterial injury. Pseudoaneurysm is the most frequent complication after catheter-associated interventions and occurs because of an insufficient closure of the puncture site. However, there are several reported cases of patients with pseudoaneurysm without a prior history of vascular intervention. We described a case of ruptured giant abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysm in a patient with no prior history of vascular intervention, with an initial complaint of abdominal pain. The patient successfully received EVAR therapy using a kissing graft.

Enhancing image quality in computed tomography angiography follow-ups after endovascular aneurysm repair: a comparative study of reconstruction techniques.

BACKGROUND: The image quality of computed tomography angiography (CTA) images following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is not satisfactory, since artifacts resulting from metallic implants obstruct the clear depiction of stent and isolation lumens, and also adjacent soft tissues. However, current techniques to reduce these artifacts still need further advancements due to higher radiation doses, longer processing times and so on. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the impact of utilizing Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction (SEMAR) alongside a novel deep learning image reconstruction technique, known as the Advanced Intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE), on image quality of CTA follow-ups conducted after EVAR. MATERIALS: This retrospective study included 47 patients (mean age ± standard deviation: 68.6 ± 7.8 years; 37 males) who underwent CTA examinations following EVAR. Images were reconstructed using four different methods: hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), AiCE, the combination of HIR and SEMAR (HIR + SEMAR), and the combination of AiCE and SEMAR (AiCE + SEMAR). Two radiologists, blinded to the reconstruction techniques, independently evaluated the images. Quantitative assessments included measurements of image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), the longest length of artifacts (AL), and artifact index (AI). These parameters were subsequently compared across different reconstruction methods. RESULTS: The subjective results indicated that AiCE + SEMAR performed the best in terms of image quality. The mean image noise intensity was significantly lower in the AiCE + SEMAR group (25.35 ± 6.51 HU) than in the HIR (47.77 ± 8.76 HU), AiCE (42.93 ± 10.61 HU), and HIR + SEMAR (30.34 ± 4.87 HU) groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, AiCE + SEMAR exhibited the highest SNRs and CNRs, as well as the lowest AIs and ALs. Importantly, endoleaks and thrombi were most clearly visualized using AiCE + SEMAR. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to other reconstruction methods, the combination of AiCE + SEMAR demonstrates superior image quality, thereby enhancing the detection capabilities and diagnostic confidence of potential complications such as early minor endleaks and thrombi following EVAR. This improvement in image quality could lead to more accurate diagnoses and better patient outcomes.

Aortic aneurysm sac filling with AneuFix injectable polymer during endovascular aneurysm repair: feasibility and safety trial study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Type II endoleaks (T2ELs) following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can lead to aneurysm growth, compromising the stent graft seal and risking rupture. Preventing these endoleaks during EVAR involves filling the AAA sac around the stent graft to exclude the aneurysm and block any arteries causing the endoleak. This study investigates the feasibility and safety of using AneuFix, a biocompatible injectable polymer developed by TripleMed (Geleen, the Netherlands), for aneurysmal sac filling during EVAR in high-risk T2EL patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A feasibility, single-arm, single-centre clinical trial will initially include five patients with infrarenal AAA, eligible for EVAR, and at high risk for T2EL based on the number of patent lumbar arteries and the cross-sectional area of the aortic lumen at the level of the inferior mesenteric artery. Postevaluation by the Data Safety and Monitoring Board, the study cohort will extend to 25 patients. During EVAR and after stent graft deployment, the aneurysm sac is filled with AneuFix polymer using a filling sheath positioned parallel to the contralateral limb with the tip inside the aneurysm sac. Primary outcome is technical success (successful AAA sac filling). The secondary outcomes include clinical success at 6 and 12 months (occurrence of T2ELs and AAA growth assessed with CT angiography), intraoperative and perioperative complications, all endoleaks, adverse events, re-interventions, aneurysm rupture and patient survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was approved by the Dutch Authorities (Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, IGJ), Amsterdam University Medical Centre Ethical Commission, and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki and European Medical Device Regulation. Results will be shared at (inter)national conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04307992.

The Use of Pressure Recording Analytical Method in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: The Impact on Clinical Decisions for the Appropriate Postoperative Setting and Cost-effective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the use of the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM), an hemodynamic monitoring system, in evaluating intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm, and to evaluate if the decision to refer patients to a ordinary ward or to a Cardiac Step-Down Unit (CSDU) after the intervention on the basis of intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring could be more cost-effective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After preoperative clinical evaluation, 44 patients were divided in this non-randomised study into two groups according to their postoperative destination: Group 1-ward (N=22) and Group 2-CSDU (N=22). All patients underwent monitoring with PRAM during the intervention and in the 24 postoperative hours, measuring several indices of myocardial contractility and other hemodynamic variables. RESULTS: According to the variability of two parameters, Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation, patients were classified as stable or unstable. Unstable patients showed a significant alteration in several hemodynamic indices, in comparison to stable ones. According to the intraoperative monitoring, eight high risk patients could have been sent to an ordinary ward due to their stability, with a reduction in the improper use of CSDU and, consequently, in costs. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic monitoring with PRAM can be useful in these patients, both for intraoperative management and for the choice of the more appropriate postoperative setting, possibly reducing the improper use of CSDU for hemodynamically stable patients who are judged to be at high risk preoperatively, and re-evaluating low surgical risk patients with an unstable intraoperative pattern, with a possible reduction in costs.

Factors predicting acute kidney injury in patients after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent complications in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. AKI decreases the efficiency of kidney function, allowing accumulation of waste products in the body, and an imbalance of water, acid and electrolytes in the body. As a result, the functioning of various organs throughout the body is affected. These effects may raise the cost of treatment, length of stay, and mortality rate. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the predictive factors of AKI - preoperative of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), preoperative of hemoglobin level, types of abdominal aortic aneurysms repair, and intraoperative of cardiac arrhythmias - after open and endovascular aortic repair among AAA patients within 72 h. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 196 patients with AAA after elective open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair within the first 72 h who met the inclusion criteria recruited from a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Postoperative AKI after elective open and endovascular aortic repair among AAA patients is defined by the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 196 AAA patients, 75.5% were male with an average age of 75.12 years (SD = 8.45). Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair was used more frequently than open aortic aneurysm repair (64.8% vs 35.2%) and 37.2% of the AAA patients had intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias. The occurrence of AKI among the AAA patients after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair within 72 h was 54.1%. The AKI rate of EVAR patients was 69.8% while the AKI rate for OAR patients was 30.2%. The preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and hemoglobin level were found to jointly predict AKI and explain 32.2% of the variance (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.322, p < .05). However, the type of abdominal aortic aneurysms repair and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias did not correlate with the incidence of AKI in AAA repair patients. The predictive factors for AKI among AAA patients after aortic aneurysm repair were preoperative eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR = 4.436, 95% CI: 2.202-8.928, p < .001) and preoperative hemoglobin level between 8.1-10.0 g/dL (OR = 4.496, 95% CI: 1.831-11.040, p = .001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and preoperative hemoglobin level between 8.1-10.0 g/dL were the predictive factors for AKI among AAA patients after both open and endovascular AAA repair. Therefore, healthcare providers should be aware of and monitor signs of AKI after surgery in AAA patients, especially those undergoing EVAR with lower eGFR and hemoglobin levels.

Short-term outcomes of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with the new Braile Biomédica® total custom-made abdominal endograft: Experience from three Italian centers.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2019, Braile Biomédica® introduced a novel custom-made abdominal endograft tailored to the aorta's anatomy, featuring sizing every 3 mm and a diameter change from 50 mm to 8 mm. This design permits uncovered fenestrations around a single Z stent, eliminating the need for bridging stents to visceral vessels. Utilizing triple stent technology, optimal neck fixation is ensured, enabling treatment of necks shorter than 2 mm, with three 360° fenestrations optimizing graft fixation. This paper aims to analyze the initial experience with this custom-made infrarenal graft for abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA), concerning procedural success and post-procedural short-term outcomes. RESULTS: Among 12 patients treated from May 2022 to January 2024, technical success was achieved in 91.7 %, with only one intra-procedural complication. Follow-up CT scans at 1-3 months revealed resolution of an intraoperative endoleak and two late complications: a late type III endoleak and right renal artery occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: The recent experience with Braile Biomédica® custom-made abdominal endograft demonstrates promising outcomes, particularly in treating AAAs with challenging anatomical features.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: New Horizon in Endovascular Surgery in Bangladesh.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm remains mostly asymptomatic. It is usually detected incidentally with imaging studies. Here we present a 55 years old hypertensive, non smoker, non diabetic, male patient who was diagnosed as a case of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. He was treated by endovascular means using endograft without laparatomy. Endografts were deployed through bilateral femoral artery cut down technique under general anesthesia. Completion angiogram following this endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) technique revealed good technical success with no endoleak. This hybrid procedure was performed in a cathlab having surgical instruments in hand. Three years after the procedure, patient is doing well.

The role of CT-assessed sarcopenia and visceral adipose tissue in predicting long-term survival in patients undergoing elective endovascular infrarenal aortic repair.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if ileo-psoas muscle size and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) can predict long-term survival after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Patients who underwent EVAR between 2004 and 2012 in a single centre were included. Total psoas muscle area (TPA), abdominal VAT area, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and total adipose tissue were measured on the preoperative CT. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Values are presented as median and interquartile range or absolute number and percentage. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the associations with mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-four patients could be included in the study. During a median follow-up of 8 (4-11) years, 223 (79.9%) patients died. Age (P ≤ .001), cardiovascular (P = .041), cerebrovascular (P = .009), renal diseases (P = .002), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P ≤ .001) were independently associated with mortality. TPA was associated with mortality in a univariate (P = .040), but not in a multivariate regression model (P = .764). No significant association was found between mortality and TPA index (P = .103) or any of the adiposity measurements with the exception of SAT (P = .040). However, SAT area loss in a multivariate analysis (P = .875). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of core muscle size and VAT did not contribute to improving the prediction of long-term survival after EVAR. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The finding of this study contradicts the previously claimed utility of core muscle size and VAT in predicting long-term survival after EVAR.

Implantable Pressure-Sensing Devices for Monitoring Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Post-Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Over the past two decades, there has been extensive research into surveillance methods for the post-endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, highlighting the importance of these technologies in supplementing or even replacing conventional image-screening modalities. This review aims to provide an overview of the current status of alternative surveillance solutions for endovascular aneurysm repair, while also identifying potential aneurysm features that could be used to develop novel monitoring technologies. It offers a comprehensive review of these recent clinical advances, comparing new and standard clinical practices. After introducing the clinical understanding of abdominal aortic aneurysms and exploring current treatment procedures, the paper discusses the current surveillance methods for endovascular repair, contrasting them with recent pressure-sensing technologies. The literature on three commercial pressure-sensing devices for post-endovascular repair surveillance is analyzed. Various pre-clinical and clinical studies assessing the safety and efficacy of these devices are reviewed, providing a comparative summary of their outcomes. The review of the results from pre-clinical and clinical studies suggests a consistent trend of decreased blood pressure in the excluded aneurysm sac post-repair. However, despite successful pressure readings from the aneurysm sac, no strong link has been established to translate these measurements into the presence or absence of endoleaks. Furthermore, the results do not allow for a conclusive determination of ongoing aneurysm sac growth. Consequently, a strong clinical need persists for monitoring endoleaks and aneurysm growth following endovascular repair.

Efficacy of Preemptive Embolization of Sac Branches During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate.

OBJECTIVE: A type 2 endoleak (T2EL) is the most frequently occurring endoleak type after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Residual T2ELs may cause aneurysm rupture; however, the management of a T2EL remains controversial. This study evaluated sac branch preemptive embolization using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, aiming to prevent T2ELs and sac shrinkage. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients underwent elective preemptive embolization during EVAR at our hospital between August 2018 to March 2019. Their demographic information, operative details, and sac diameters were examined at 6 months after EVAR. RESULTS: No procedural complications were observed. There were no in-hospital deaths among the 12 patients. Sac shrinkage was observed in this cohort (53.8-52.1 mm, p = 0.01). A total of 33 lumbar arteries were occluded with this procedure, and 2 patients had residual T2ELs at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: A T2EL in preemptive sac branch embolization during EVAR has advantages in terms of safety and reduction. Although no clear evidence is available for the management of T2ELs, this study proposes a new standard to prevent it and improve the long-term outcomes after EVAR. However, embolization remains imperfect and further research is necessary.