Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 11.129
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2416760, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869906

ABSTRACT

Importance: The use of evidence-based standardized outcome measures is increasingly recognized as key to guiding clinical decision-making in mental health. Implementation of these measures into clinical practice has been hampered by lack of clarity on what to measure and how to do this in a reliable and standardized way. Objective: To develop a core set of outcome measures for specific neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), communication disorders, specific learning disorders, and motor disorders, that may be used across a range of geographic and cultural settings. Evidence Review: An international working group composed of clinical and research experts and service users (n = 27) was convened to develop a standard core set of accessible, valid, and reliable outcome measures for children and adolescents with NDDs. The working group participated in 9 video conference calls and 8 surveys between March 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022. A modified Delphi approach defined the scope, outcomes, included measures, case-mix variables, and measurement time points. After development, the NDD set was distributed to professionals and service users for open review, feedback, and external validation. Findings: The final set recommends measuring 12 outcomes across 3 key domains: (1) core symptoms related to the diagnosis; (2) impact, functioning, and quality of life; and (3) common coexisting problems. The following 14 measures should be administered at least every 6 months to monitor these outcomes: ADHD Rating Scale 5, Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Rating Scale, or Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale IV; Affective Reactivity Index; Children's Communication Checklist 2; Colorado Learning Disabilities Questionnaire; Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire; Developmental-Disability Children's Global Assessment Scale; Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire; Family Strain Index; Intelligibility in Context Scale; Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale or Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised and Social Responsiveness Scale; Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scales; and Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. The external review survey was completed by 32 professionals and 40 service users. The NDD set items were endorsed by more than 70% of professionals and service users in the open review survey. Conclusions and Relevance: The NDD set covers outcomes of most concern to patients and caregivers. Use of the NDD set has the potential to improve clinical practice and research.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Neurodevelopmental Disorders , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Humans , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/diagnosis , Child , Adolescent , Delphi Technique , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Female
2.
Brain Nerve ; 76(6): 761-765, 2024 Jun.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853506

ABSTRACT

Diagnosis of ADHD in adulthood is increasing rapidly in Japan. The ADHD symptoms occur on a continuum with those of normal development and are likely to fluctuate with the growth process and environment at the time of diagnosis. Especially in adult cases, comorbid psychiatric disorders tend to influence the characteristics of ADHD. ADHD has diverse clinical manifestations and a heterogeneous biological background. In addition to the RDoC approach to elucidate the pathogenesis and etiology of the disorder, we expect that attempts will be made to classify the disorder into relatively homogeneous biological subcategories.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/etiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Humans , Adult
3.
Mol Autism ; 15(1): 25, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849897

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Autism and different neurodevelopmental conditions frequently co-occur, as do their symptoms at sub-diagnostic threshold levels. Overlapping traits and shared genetic liability are potential explanations. METHODS: In the population-based Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort study (MoBa), we leverage item-level data to explore the phenotypic factor structure and genetic architecture underlying neurodevelopmental traits at age 3 years (N = 41,708-58,630) using maternal reports on 76 items assessing children's motor and language development, social functioning, communication, attention, activity regulation, and flexibility of behaviors and interests. RESULTS: We identified 11 latent factors at the phenotypic level. These factors showed associations with diagnoses of autism and other neurodevelopmental conditions. Most shared genetic liabilities with autism, ADHD, and/or schizophrenia. Item-level GWAS revealed trait-specific genetic correlations with autism (items rg range = - 0.27-0.78), ADHD (items rg range = - 0.40-1), and schizophrenia (items rg range = - 0.24-0.34). We find little evidence of common genetic liability across all neurodevelopmental traits but more so for several genetic factors across more specific areas of neurodevelopment, particularly social and communication traits. Some of these factors, such as one capturing prosocial behavior, overlap with factors found in the phenotypic analyses. Other areas, such as motor development, seemed to have more heterogenous etiology, with specific traits showing a less consistent pattern of genetic correlations with each other. CONCLUSIONS: These exploratory findings emphasize the etiological complexity of neurodevelopmental traits at this early age. In particular, diverse associations with neurodevelopmental conditions and genetic heterogeneity could inform follow-up work to identify shared and differentiating factors in the early manifestations of neurodevelopmental traits and their relation to autism and other neurodevelopmental conditions. This in turn could have implications for clinical screening tools and programs.


Subject(s)
Phenotype , Humans , Norway , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/genetics , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/diagnosis , Mothers , Autistic Disorder/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Adult , Fathers , Genome-Wide Association Study , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/genetics , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/genetics , Genetic Heterogeneity
4.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol ; 53(3): 361-372, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38905157

ABSTRACT

This is a commentary on Danielson and colleagues' report entitled "ADHD Prevalence Among U.S. Children and Adolescents in 2022: Diagnosis, Severity, Co-Occurring Disorders, and Treatment," which provides updated prevalence rates related to ADHD diagnosis and treatment utilization using data from the 2022 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). This timely article is among the first to report on ADHD prevalence rates since the COVID-19 pandemic, and highlights important patterns related to ADHD diagnosis and treatment utilization. In this commentary, we contextualize these findings with consideration to the COVID-19 pandemic and within the existing literature on health disparities among youth with ADHD and their families. We end with recommendations for future work involving researchers, clinicians, and policymakers with the intention of reducing disparities in ADHD diagnosis and treatment in the U.S.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , COVID-19 , Humans , Child , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Health Surveys , Child Health
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2418204, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38935377

ABSTRACT

Importance: Several reports suggest an increase in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. This nationwide study assessed new ADHD diagnoses and ADHD prevalence before and during the pandemic. Objective: To investigate trends in new ADHD diagnoses, prevalence, and ADHD medication use from 2015 to 2022 in Finland. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study comprised the entire Finnish population. ADHD diagnoses and medication use were obtained from nationwide registers and assessed at 3 time points: in 2015 and before (2020) and after (2022) the pandemic. Data were analyzed from January 2015 to June 2022. Main outcomes and Measures: New ADHD diagnoses, ADHD lifetime prevalence, and ADHD medication use. Results: The cohort comprised 5 572 420 individuals (2 819 645 women [50.6%]). Lifetime prevalence of ADHD increased by 2.7-fold during 2015 to 2022; prevalence was 1.02% in 2015 (95% CI, 1.01%-1.03%), 1.80% in 2020 (95% CI, 1.79%-1.81%), and 2.76% in 2022 (95% CI, 2.75%-2.77%). Young men aged 13 to 20 years had the highest lifetime prevalence of 11.68% (95% CI, 11.56%-11.81%) in 2022. New ADHD diagnoses doubled during the pandemic, from 238 per 100 000 in 2020 to 477 per 100 000 in 2022. The pandemic-associated incremental increase in new diagnoses was 18.60% (95% CI, 16.47%-20.49%; 9482 per 50 897 cases). Young women aged 13 to 20 years had a 2.6-fold increase in new diagnoses during the pandemic, from 577 per 100 000 in 2020 to 1488 per 100 000 in 2022, and women aged 21 to 30 years had a 3.0-fold increase, from 361 per 100 000 to 1100 per 100 000. New diagnoses increased by 2.9-fold among those older than 55 years (from 5 per 100 000 to 13 per 100 000 in women and from 5 per 100 000 to 14 per 100 000 in men). Boys younger than 13 years had the highest absolute rate of new ADHD diagnoses in 2022 (1745 per 100 000), but boys and young men younger than 21 years did not show a significant incremental increase in new diagnoses. Lifetime prevalence of ADHD medication purchases was 0.57% (95% CI, 0.56%-0.58%) in 2015 (31 771 [55.62%] of those with ADHD diagnosis), 1.15% (95% CI, 1.14%-1.16%) in 2020 (64 034 [63.83%]), and 1.69% (95% CI 1.68%-1.70%) in 2022 (92 557 [61.43%]), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationwide cohort study, new ADHD diagnoses and ADHD prevalence showed significant increase in Finland during the pandemic. ADHD medication use did not increase in relation to ADHD diagnoses. These results highlight potential adverse outcomes of pandemic-associated changes in living conditions.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Finland/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Male , Adult , Adolescent , Prevalence , Longitudinal Studies , Young Adult , Child , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Registries , Child, Preschool
6.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 471, 2024 Jun 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937684

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The inclusion of biomarkers could improve diagnostic accuracy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). One potential biomarker is the ADHD polygenic score (PGS), a measure of genetic liability for ADHD. This study aimed to investigate if the ADHD PGS can provide additional information alongside ADHD rating scales and examination of family history of ADHD to distinguish between ADHD cases and controls. METHODS: Polygenic scores were calculated for 576 adults with ADHD and 530 ethnically matched controls. ADHD PGS was used alongside scores from the Wender-Utah Rating Scale (WURS) and the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) as predictors of ADHD diagnosis in a set of nested logistic regression models. These models were compared by likelihood ratio (LR) tests, Akaike information criterion corrected for small samples (AICc), and Lee R². These analyses were repeated with family history of ADHD as a covariate in all models. RESULTS: The ADHD PGS increased the variance explained of the ASRS by 0.58% points (pp) (R2ASRS = 61.11%, R2ASRS + PGS=61.69%), the WURS by 0.61pp (R2WURS = 77.33%, R2WURS + PGS= 77.94%), of ASRS and WURS together by 0.57pp (R2ASRS + WURS=80.84%, R2ASRS + WURS+PGS=81.40%), and of self-reported family history by 1.40pp (R2family = 28.06%, R2family + PGS=29.46%). These increases were statistically significant, as measured by LR tests and AICc. CONCLUSION: We found that the ADHD PGS contributed additional information to common diagnostic aids. However, the increase in variance explained was small, suggesting that the ADHD PGS is currently not a clinically useful diagnostic aid. Future studies should examine the utility of ADHD PGS in ADHD prediction alongside non-genetic risk factors, and the diagnostic utility of the ADHD PGS should be evaluated as more genetic data is accumulated and computational tools are further refined.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Multifactorial Inheritance , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/genetics , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Male , Female , Multifactorial Inheritance/genetics , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Self Report , Middle Aged
7.
J Dev Behav Pediatr ; 45(3): e203-e210, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896562

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can have challenging behaviors putting them at risk for preschool expulsion and for adverse outcomes across child development, health, and education. We examined the association of preschool expulsion with ADHD symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and functioning among children with ADHD. METHODS: Using the cross-sectional National Survey of the Diagnosis and Treatment of ADHD and Tourette Syndrome on 2947 children aged 5 to 17 years ever diagnosed with ADHD, parents reported on preschool expulsion, ADHD symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and functioning. Weighted analyses included calculations of estimated means, prevalence, and prevalence ratios. RESULTS: Preschool expulsion was experienced by 4.4% of children ever diagnosed with ADHD (girls: 1.5%; boys: 5.7%). Children with preschool expulsion had lower mean ages at first concern about ADHD symptoms, ADHD diagnosis, and initiation of ADHD medication and had higher prevalence of severe ADHD symptoms and other mental, behavioral, or developmental disorders. A history of preschool expulsion was associated with difficulties with overall school performance, organized activities, writing, handwriting, and the parent-child relationship, but not with math, reading, or peer or sibling relationships. Children with preschool expulsion more often received school supports, behavioral classroom management, peer intervention, and social skills training. CONCLUSION: Among children ever diagnosed with ADHD, history of preschool expulsion was associated with more severe ADHD symptoms, other disorders, earlier diagnosis and medication initiation, and academic and social impairment. Health care providers can use preschool expulsion as an indicator of risk for children with ADHD and connect families to effective treatments.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Male , Child, Preschool , Child , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , United States/epidemiology
8.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884438

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical and neurophysiological features of children with low cognitive tempo (NCT), as well as the effectiveness of the drug Pantogam in the treatment of this pathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 90 children aged 8 to 10 years were examined. Of these, the main study group consisted of 30 children with NCT, the comparison group consisted of 30 children with a combined type of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ADHD (ADHD-K), the control group consisted of 30 children without neuropsychiatric disorders. The study used clinical, neurophysiological (electroencephalography (EEG)) and parametric methods. The CMAS scale of apparent anxiety (The Children's Form of Manifest Anxiety Scale), the SNAP-IY scale (assessment of the degree of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity), the TOVA computer test (the Test of Variables of Attention), the scale «SCT¼ (Sluggish Cognitive Tempo) for assessing manifestations of low cognitive tempo, the «RAM¼ technique for quantifying working memory. Pantogam was used to treat patients at a dose of 750 mg per day for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Patients with NCT are characterized by more pronounced attention disorders compared with healthy peers and with children with ADHD-K, and they have a decrease in mainly not selective attention, but the overall level of functional activity. Also, the group of children with NCT has an increased level of anxiety compared to the group of children with ADHD. A comparative analysis of the level of impulsivity showed that children with NCT are less characterized by a deficit in inhibition processes. According to the quantitative analysis of the EEG, specific changes in functional activity in the frontal and central regions of the cerebral cortex were revealed (a statistically significant increase in the ratio of absolute theta rhythm to beta1 rhythm, compared with other groups), reflecting insufficient cortical arousal and less focused neural states. When re-evaluating the condition of children with NCT after a course of therapy with Pantogam, an improvement in the form of a decrease in the degree of inattention, the severity of memory impairment and a decrease in reaction time was recorded in 60% of cases. According to quantitative EEG analysis, there was a significant decrease in the ratio of absolute theta rhythm to beta1 rhythm in the central leads of both hemispheres and in the parietal-temporal leads of the left hemisphere, indicating an increase in the level of overall activation of the cerebral cortex after a course of treatment. CONCLUSION: Clinical and neurophysiological differences were revealed in patients with NCT and with combined ADHD. It has been shown that the use of Pantogam for the treatment of children with NCT leads not only to a decrease in the main manifestations of this disorder, but also to an improvement in the functional state of the brain.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Electroencephalography , Pantothenic Acid , Humans , Child , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Male , Female , Pantothenic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Pantothenic Acid/therapeutic use , Cognition , Attention/drug effects , Memory, Short-Term/drug effects , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/analogs & derivatives
9.
Transl Psychiatry ; 14(1): 251, 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858375

ABSTRACT

This research aimed to devise and assess a mobile game therapy software for children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), as well as evaluating its suitability and effectiveness in improving the cognitive ability of typically developing children. The study encompassed 55 children diagnosed with ADHD and 55 neurotypical children. Initial assessments involved ADHD-related scales, computerized tests for information processing, and physiological-psychological evaluations. After a 4-week home-based game intervention, participants underwent re-evaluation using baseline measures and provided feedback on treatment satisfaction. Considering the small proportion of study participants who dropped out, data was analyzed using both the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) analysis and the Per-protocol (PP) analysis. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06181747). In ITT analysis, post-intervention analysis using linear mixed models indicated that the ADHD group improved significantly more than the neurotypical group particularly in Continuous Performance Test (CPT) accuracy (B = -23.92, p < 0.001) and reaction time (B = 86.08, p < 0.01), along with enhancements in anti-saccade (B = -10.65, p < 0.05) and delayed-saccade tasks (B = 0.34, p < 0.05). A reduction in parent-rated SNAP-IV scores was also observed (B = 0.43, p < 0.01). In PP analysis, paired-sample t-tests suggested that the ADHD group had significant changes pre- and post-intervention, in terms of CPT Accuracy (t = -7.62, p < 0.01), Anti-saccade task Correct Rate (t = -3.90, p < 0.01) and SNAP-IV scores (t = -4,64, p < 0.01). However, no significant changes post-intervention were observed in the neurotypical group. Survey feedback highlighted a strong interest in the games across both groups, though ADHD participants found the game more challenging. Parents of ADHD children reported perceived benefits and a willingness to continue the game therapy, unlike the neurotypical group's parents. The findings advocated for the integration of serious video games as a complementary tool in ADHD treatment strategies, demonstrating the potential to augment attentional abilities and alleviate clinical symptoms. However, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is needed to further verify its efficacy.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Feasibility Studies , Video Games , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Child , Male , Female , Mobile Applications , Treatment Outcome
12.
Asian J Psychiatr ; 97: 104087, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38820852

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify important features of white matter microstructures collectively distinguishing individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) from those without ADHD using a machine-learning approach. METHODS: Fifty-one ADHD patients and 60 typically developing controls (TDC) underwent diffusion spectrum imaging at two time points. We evaluated three models to classify ADHD and TDC using various machine-learning algorithms. Model 1 employed baseline white matter features of 45 white matter tracts at Time 1; Model 2 incorporated features from both time points; and Model 3 (main analysis) further included the relative rate of change per year of white matter tracts. RESULTS: The random forest algorithm demonstrated the best performance for classification. Model 1 achieved an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.67. Model 3, incorporating Time 2 variables and relative rate of change per year, improved the performance (AUC = 0.73). In addition to identifying several white matter features at two time points, we found that the relative rate of change per year in the superior longitudinal fasciculus, frontal aslant tract, stria terminalis, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, thalamic and striatal tracts, and other tracts involving sensorimotor regions are important features of ADHD. A higher relative change rate in certain tracts was associated with greater improvement in visual attention, spatial short-term memory, and spatial working memory. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the significant diagnostic value of white matter microstructure and the developmental change rates of specific tracts, reflecting deviations from typical development trajectories, in identifying ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Machine Learning , White Matter , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnostic imaging , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/pathology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , White Matter/diagnostic imaging , White Matter/pathology , Male , Female , Longitudinal Studies , Child , Adolescent , Diffusion Tensor Imaging/methods
13.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 378, 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To translate and culturally adapt the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) to a Swedish version, CSHQ-SWE, and to assess its validity and reliability for use with children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: A total of 84 children with ADHD (51 boys and 33 girls; 6-12 years) and parents (7 men and 77 women; 28-51 years) were included in the study. CSHQ was translated and culturally adapted to Swedish, and assessed for concurrent validity with sleep actigraphy (analyzed by Kendall's Tau) and for reliability by internal consistency (analyzed by McDonald's Omega H). Face and content validity was evaluated by parents (n = 4) and healthcare professionals (n = 6) qualitatively (comprehensiveness, relevance, and comprehensibility assessed by interviews and analyzed by thematic analysis) and quantitatively (analyzed by content validity ratio and content validity index for 33 items and four non-scored inquiries). RESULTS: Parent-reported sleep problems (CSHQ-SWE total score) were moderately correlated with less "Sleep Efficiency" (Tau = -0.305; p < 0.001) measured by sleep actigraphy. Parent-reported problems with "Sleep Onset Delay" was moderately correlated with measured time for "Sleep Onset Latency" (Tau = 0.433; p < 0.001). Parent-reported problems with "Night Wakings" were weakly correlated with measured time for "Wake After Sleep Onset" (Tau = 0.282; p < 0.001). Parents estimation of "Total daily sleep duration" was moderately correlated with measured "Total Sleep Time" (Tau = 0.386; p < 0.001). Five of the seven subscales reached an acceptable level for internal consistency (McDonald's Omega H > 0.700). Comprehensiveness, relevance, and comprehensibility of CSHQ-SWE were satisfactory overall. Content validity ratio was 0.80 to 1.00 for six items, 0.00 to 0.60 for 22 items, and < 0.00 for nine items. Content validity index was 0.22. CONCLUSIONS: CSHQ-SWE demonstrated acceptable concurrent validity with objectively measured sleep and internal consistency, whereas the overall results of face and content validity assessment varied. The instrument needs to be further evaluated regarding construct validity, responsiveness, test-retest reliability, and its generalization to other populations.


Subject(s)
Actigraphy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Parents , Humans , Male , Female , Child , Reproducibility of Results , Sweden , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Adult , Middle Aged , Translations , Sleep , Habits , Sleep Wake Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology
14.
J Atten Disord ; 28(9): 1331-1339, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38817116

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the prevalence, associated factors, and psychiatric comorbidities of adult ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic by analyzing nationally representative data. METHODS: Among the 5,511 respondents of the 2021 National Mental Health Survey, South Korea, 2,764 (18-49 years) were selected. The Korean versions of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and Structured Clinical Interview for Internet Gaming Disorder were used as diagnostic assessments. RESULTS: The 6-month prevalence of positive screens for adult ADHD was 3.1%. In individuals aged 18 to 29 years exhibiting adult ADHD symptoms, high prevalence rates of alcohol use, depression, and Internet gaming disorders were observed in the last 12 months. Adults who screened positive for ADHD reported significantly lower life satisfaction and resilience, and higher loneliness and social isolation (vs. non-ADHD group). CONCLUSION: Adult ADHD symptoms significantly influenced mental well-being, highlighting the need for an appropriate treatment/prevention system, particularly for individuals aged 18 to 29 years.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/psychology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Male , Female , Young Adult , Prevalence , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Internet Addiction Disorder/epidemiology , Internet Addiction Disorder/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Isolation/psychology , Health Surveys , Loneliness/psychology
15.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 78(5): 382-391, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38690774

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The WHO Adult ADHD Self-report Scale (ASRSv1.1 and ASRS-S) is used for screening for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The capacity of the Swedish version of the scale to discriminate ADHD from borderline personality disorder (BPD) and bipolar disorder (BP) has not been tested. AIM: Evaluate scoring methods, psychometric properties, and diagnostic accuracy of the Swedish versions of ASRSv1.1/ASRS-S in a group of patients with ADHD and/or BPD and/or BP. METHOD: A total of 151 young adult psychiatric patients diagnosed with ADHD, BPD and/or BD completed ASRSv1.1 and the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS) for ADHD symptoms, and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) for functional impairment. ADHD diagnoses were assessed with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS) interview. Both versions of the scale were analysed through dichotomised and non-dichotomised scoring for diagnostic accuracy analysis. RESULTS: The internal consistency for ASRSv1.1/ASRS-S was satisfactory with α 0.913 and 0.743, respectively. The two-factor structure of the ASRSv1.1 and the one factor structure of ASRS-S were supported by the confirmatory factor analyses. A strong positive correlation was found between ASRSv1.1 and WURS and a moderate level of correlation was found between ASRSv1.1 and SDS. The area under the curve for both scoring methods were excellent with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.808 and 0.817, respectively. Optimal cut-off scores were in line with the original recommendations. CONCLUSION: The Swedish translation of ASRSv1.1/ASRS-S has psychometric properties comparable to other populations and the capacity to screen for ADHD in patients with overlapping symptoms.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Bipolar Disorder , Borderline Personality Disorder , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics , Self Report , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Sweden , Female , Adult , Male , Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Young Adult , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Diagnosis, Differential
16.
Autism Res ; 17(6): 1094-1105, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747403

ABSTRACT

Early motor delays and differences are common among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Yet, little work has shown whether there are early atypical motor signs that differentiate these groups. Quantitative measures of movement variability hold promise for improving the identification of subtle and specific differences in motor function among infants and toddlers at high likelihood for ASD and ADHD. To this end, we created a novel quantitative measure of movement variability (movement curvature) and conducted a preliminary investigation as to whether this measure improves outcome predictions. We used a wearable triaxial accelerometer to evaluate continuous motion-based activity in infants at high and low likelihood for ASD and ADHD at 12, 18, 24, and 36 months of age. At 36 months, participants were categorized into three outcome groups: ASD (n = 19), ADHD concerns (n = 17), and a comparison group (n = 82). We examined group differences in movement curvature and whether movement curvature is predictive of a later ASD or ADHD concerns classification. We found that movement curvature was significantly lower in infants with later ASD diagnosis at 18, 24, and 36 months of age compared to infants with either ADHD concerns or those in the comparison group. Movement curvature was also a significant predictor of ASD at 18, 24, and 36 months (AUC 0.66-0.71; p = 0.005-0.039) and when adjusting for high ASD likelihood at 18 and 24 months (AUC 0.90, p = 0.05-0.019). These results indicate that lower movement curvature may be a feature of early motor differences in infants with later ASD diagnosis as early as 18 months of age.


Subject(s)
Accelerometry , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Autism Spectrum Disorder , Movement , Wearable Electronic Devices , Humans , Autism Spectrum Disorder/physiopathology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Movement/physiology , Accelerometry/methods , Accelerometry/instrumentation
17.
Autism Res ; 17(6): 1276-1286, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695661

ABSTRACT

Autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbidity in the school population have been understudied. This study estimates its prevalence considering both parents' and teachers' reports and clinical diagnosis. Sociodemographic, clinical, and cognitive data were compared by diagnostic groups: autism, ADHD, autism and ADHD, subthreshold autism spectrum disorder (ASD), subthreshold ADHD, and children without neurodevelopmental conditions. Following a two-phase design, 3727 parents and teachers (1802 preschoolers, 1925 school-age children) participated in the first phase. Subsequently, 781 participants underwent individual assessment for DSM-5 diagnoses. The estimated prevalence of the comorbid diagnosis was 0.51% (0.28%-0.74%), with significant sex differences (0.16% girls, 0.89% boys). The cooccurrence of symptoms of autism and ADHD reported by parents or teachers was 3.2% and 2.6%, respectively. ADHD comorbidity was observed in 32.8% of autistic children and 31.4% of those with subthreshold ASD. ASD comorbidity was observed in 9.8% of children with ADHD and 5.7% of those with subthreshold ADHD. Comorbidity was reported by at least one informant in 95% of children. Only 15.8% of children with autism and ADHD had been previously diagnosed with both conditions. Early detection and accurate comorbidity diagnosis are crucial to address the clinical and socio-educational needs of these children.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Comorbidity , Schools , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Male , Female , Child , Prevalence , Child, Preschool , Schools/statistics & numerical data , Autism Spectrum Disorder/epidemiology , Parents , Autistic Disorder/epidemiology , School Teachers/statistics & numerical data
18.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol ; 53(3): 343-360, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778436

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide updated national prevalence estimates of diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), ADHD severity, co-occurring disorders, and receipt of ADHD medication and behavioral treatment among U.S. children and adolescents by demographic and clinical subgroups using data from the 2022 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). METHOD: This study used 2022 NSCH data to estimate the prevalence of ever diagnosed and current ADHD among U.S. children aged 3-17 years. Among children with current ADHD, ADHD severity, presence of current co-occurring disorders, and receipt of medication and behavioral treatment were estimated. Weighted estimates were calculated overall and for demographic and clinical subgroups (n = 45,169). RESULTS: Approximately 1 in 9 U.S. children have ever received an ADHD diagnosis (11.4%, 7.1 million children) and 10.5% (6.5 million) had current ADHD. Among children with current ADHD, 58.1% had moderate or severe ADHD, 77.9% had at least one co-occurring disorder, approximately half of children with current ADHD (53.6%) received ADHD medication, and 44.4% had received behavioral treatment for ADHD in the past year; nearly one third (30.1%) did not receive any ADHD-specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric ADHD remains an ongoing and expanding public health concern, as approximately 1 million more children had ever received an ADHD diagnosis in 2022 than in 2016. Estimates from the 2022 NSCH provide information on pediatric ADHD during the last full year of the COVID-19 pandemic and can be used by policymakers, government agencies, health care systems, public health practitioners, and other partners to plan for needs of children with ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Comorbidity , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Child , Adolescent , Male , Female , United States/epidemiology , Prevalence , Child, Preschool , Behavior Therapy/methods , Health Surveys
19.
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi ; 62(6): 548-552, 2024 Jun 02.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763877

ABSTRACT

Objective: To explore the optimization of the standardized assessment tool for clinical diagnosis of Chinese developmental dyslexia (DD). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to December 2023, in which 130 primary school children in grades 1 to 3 with clinical signs of literacy lag and positive screening results on the screening scales were recruited from the outpatient clinic of Child Health Care Medical Division, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Chinese dyslexia screening behavior checklist for primary students (CDSBC) was used as the screening scales, and supplemented by dyslexia checklist for Chinese children. Referring to the standard procedure of the"expert advice on diagnosis and intervention of Chinese developmental dyslexia", the developmental dyslexia scale for standard mandarin (DDSSM) was used to evaluate the children's literacy-related cognitive abilities and conduct the diagnostic assessment, and divided the children into learning backward group and the DD group. The t-test and χ2 test were used to compare the differences in the distribution of intelligence, literacy and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder between the two groups. Spearman's correlation was used to analyze the correlation between the scores for each cognitive ability in the DDSSM and the CDSBC. Results: Of the 130 children, 90 were male, aged (8.3±1.0) years; 40 were female, aged (8.1±0.9) years. A final diagnosis of DD was made in 59 cases, of which 41 were males. There was no statistically significant difference in operational intelligence quotient (101±15 vs.100±15, t=0.53, P>0.05) and statistically significant difference in literacy of DDSSM (32±5 vs.21±4, t=11.56, P<0.001) between the learning backward group and the DD group. Eighteen cases (25.4%) of the learning backward group were children with attention deficit subtype attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-I), and 16 cases (27.1%) in DD group, the difference in incidence between the two groups was not statistically significant (χ2=0.05, P>0.05). There were correlations between the DDSSM (for oral vocabulary, morphological awareness and orthographic awareness) and the CDSBC total score (r=-0.42, -0.32, -0.35, all P<0.01), but the correlations for visuospatial perception and rapid automatized naming with CDSBC total score were not statistically significant (r=-0.09 and -0.20,both P>0.05). Conclusion: For literacy-related cognitive abilities, screening scales CDSBC are not sufficiently useful for assessment, so the introduction of standardized assessment tools DDSSM is an optimization of the clinical diagnosis of Chinese DD, which is crucial for achieving accurate diagnosis and intervention.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Dyslexia , Reading , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , China , Cognition , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dyslexia/diagnosis , East Asian People , Intelligence , Literacy , Mass Screening/methods , Students
20.
Dev Neuropsychol ; 49(5): 191-206, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801083

ABSTRACT

It is not yet understood whether, and to what extent, craniosynostosis impacts the development of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This PRISMA compliant and PROSPERO pre-registered (ID: CRD42023458640) systematic review and meta-analysis examines the association of single-suture, non-syndromic craniosynostosis with ADHD and inattention/hyperactivity symptoms. Data from 17 independent studies (Nparticipants = 2,389; Mage = 7.3 years) were analyzed, taking into consideration suture location, surgical status, age, and measures administered, where feasible. Few differences were found between cases and controls, but some studies reported high symptom levels. Additional research is required utilizing larger sample sizes and more comprehensive assessment of ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Craniosynostoses , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/etiology , Craniosynostoses/complications , Child
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...