Overview and Diagnostic Approach in Autoimmune Neurology.

OBJECTIVE: The field of autoimmune neurology is rapidly evolving. This article reviews the epidemiology and pathophysiology as well as current approaches to clinical and paraclinical assessment, testing paradigms, and general principles of treatment. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Improved recognition of autoimmune diagnoses among patients who have phenotypically diverse, subacute onset neurologic presentations is facilitated by disease-specific antibody biomarker discovery. These antibodies have varying associations with paraneoplastic causation (from no association to greater than 70% positive predictive value), immunotherapy responses, and outcomes. To simplify assessment in an increasingly complex discipline, neurologic phenotype-specific serum and CSF antibody evaluations are recommended. Clinical trials have led to the approval of monoclonal therapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and are underway for N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitides. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Autoimmune neurology is now a mainstream subspecialty, consisting of disorders with diverse presentations detectable using antibody testing of serum and CSF. Early and sustained immunotherapy (eg, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg], plasma exchange) is recommended and may be supplemented by immune suppressants (eg, rituximab or cyclophosphamide) to sustain responses and optimize outcomes.

Autoimmune Encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: This article focuses on the clinical features and diagnostic evaluations that accurately identify patients with ever-expanding forms of antibody-defined encephalitis. Forms of autoimmune encephalitis are more prevalent than infectious encephalitis and represent treatable neurologic syndromes for which early immunotherapies lead to the best outcomes. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: A clinically driven approach to identifying many autoimmune encephalitis syndromes is feasible, given the typically distinctive features associated with each antibody. Patient demographics alongside the presence and nature of seizures, cognitive impairment, psychiatric disturbances, movement disorders, and peripheral features provide a valuable set of clinical tools to guide the detection and interpretation of highly specific antibodies. In turn, these clinical features in combination with serologic findings and selective paraclinical testing, direct the rationale for the administration of immunotherapies. Observational studies provide the mainstay of evidence guiding first- and second-line immunotherapy administration in autoimmune encephalitis and, whereas these typically result in some clinical improvements, almost all patients have residual neuropsychiatric deficits, and many experience clinical relapses. An improved pathophysiologic understanding and ongoing clinical trials can help to address these unmet medical needs. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Antibodies against central nervous system proteins characterize various autoimmune encephalitis syndromes. The most common targets include leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1 (LGI1), N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, contactin-associated proteinlike 2 (CASPR2), and glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65). Each antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis typically presents with a recognizable blend of clinical and investigation features, which help differentiate each from alternative diagnoses. The rapid expansion of recognized antibodies and some clinical overlaps support panel-based antibody testing. The clinical-serologic picture guides the immunotherapy regime and offers valuable prognostic information. Patient care should be delivered in conjunction with autoimmune encephalitis experts.

Pediatric Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: This article discusses common principles in diagnosing and managing autoimmune neurologic conditions in children. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: The key to improving outcomes in all patients with autoimmune neurologic diseases is making an early diagnosis, promptly initiating treatment, and identifying patients who will benefit from long-term maintenance treatment. Some neuroinflammatory syndromes can be diagnosed with an antibody biomarker (eg, aquaporin-4 antibodies, N-methyl-d-aspartate [NMDA] receptor antibodies), whereas others require clinical diagnostic criteria (eg, multiple sclerosis, opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome). A proportion of children will be labeled as seronegative, and further investigations for other inflammatory or monogenetic etiologies need to be carried out in parallel with treating the central nervous system inflammation. Time to treatment and treatment escalation were shown to correlate with outcomes in many patients with these disorders. The choice and duration of treatment should be evaluated considering side effects and risks in the short and long terms. The presence of a highly inflammatory disease process in children supports the use of highly effective disease-modifying therapies in pediatrics. ESSENTIAL POINTS: The phenotypes of pediatric autoimmune neurologic conditions may change across different age groups, as the brain is still actively developing. In general, the presentation in children is more inflammatory, but overall disability is lower, likely because of better neuroplasticity and repair. Convincing evidence has increasingly emerged to support the biological rationale that effective immunosuppressive therapies used in adult neuroimmunology are equally effective in children.

Therapeutic Approach to Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Autoimmune neurologic disorders encompass a broad category of diseases characterized by immune system attack of the central, peripheral, or autonomic nervous systems. This article provides information on both acute and maintenance immunotherapy used to treat autoimmune neurologic disorders as well as a review of symptomatic management and special considerations when caring for patients with these diseases. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Over the past 20 years, more than 50 antibodies have been identified and associated with autoimmune neurologic disorders. Although advances in diagnostic testing have allowed for more rapid diagnosis, the therapeutic approach to these disorders has largely continued to rely on expert opinion, case series, and case reports. With US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of biologic agents to treat neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myasthenia gravis as well as ongoing clinical trials for the treatment of autoimmune encephalitis, the landscape of immunotherapy options continues to expand. Consideration of the unique pathogenesis of individual autoimmune neurologic disorders as well as the mechanism of action of the diverse range of treatment options can help guide treatment decisions today while evidence from clinical trials informs new therapeutics in the future. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Recognizing patients who have a clinical history and examination findings concerning for autoimmune neurologic disorders and conducting a thorough and directed imaging and laboratory evaluation aimed at ruling out mimics, identifying specific autoimmune syndromes, and screening for factors that may have an impact on immunotherapy choices early in the clinical course are essential to providing optimal care for these patients. Providers must consider immunotherapy, symptomatic treatment, and a multidisciplinary approach that addresses each patient's unique needs when treating patients with autoimmune neurologic disorders.

Apheresis treatment in autoimmune neurological diseases: Predictors of good clinical outcome and success of follow-up therapy with B-cell depletion.

OBJECTIVE: Apheresis treatment (AT) is an established standard of treatment in various neurological autoimmune diseases. Since not all patients equally benefit from AT, we saw the need to investigate the effect of different clinical, paraclinical and technical-apparative factors on the clinical outcome. Additionally, we wanted to find out whether patients who improved due to AT continue to be clinically stable under B-cell depletion (BCD). METHODS: We screened all patients (n = 358) with neurological diseases who received AT at the Medical center of the University of the Saarland in the past 20 years. Different factors (e.g., age, sex, duration until onset of AT, type of AT, number of cycles, csf parameters) were analyzed retrospectively. Clinical disability was measured using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), visual acuity and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). RESULTS: 335 patients, categorized into 11 different autoimmune diagnosis groups, received a total of 2669 treatment cycles and showed a statistically significant improvement in mRS with AT (p < 0.001). Patients in American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) categories I (p = 0.013) and II (p = 0.035) showed a significantly greater benefit under AT than those in category III. The clinical outcome was better with shorter duration until AT onset, more cycles of AT, and more plasma volume exchanged and the presence of an autoimmune antibody. Patients who initially profited had a significantly more stable course of the disease after 1-Year-BCD (p = 0.039). DISCUSSION: In the present study, we were able to identify various significant factors influencing the outcome of patients due to AT. Furthermore, we could show that patients with a response to AT can benefit from BCD follow-up therapy.

[Autoimmune Nodopathy].

Autoimmune nodopathy (AN), a newly established category of autoimmune disease, refers to an immune-mediated neuropathy associated with development of autoantibodies against membrane proteins, including neurofascin 186, neurofascin 155, contactin-1, and contactin-associated protein 1 located in the nodes of Ranvier or paranodes. Subclass analysis of these autoantibodies reveals predominant elevation of immunoglobulin (G4. Patients with AN show clinical and laboratory characteristics such as distal-predominant sensorimotor disturbance, sensory ataxia, poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin, and highly elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein levels. B cell-depletion therapy using an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody is effective for patients with AN. Autoantibody measurement is beneficial not only for diagnosis but also for deciding treatment strategies for AN.

B cell-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells as an emerging therapy in neuroimmunological diseases.

BACKGROUND: Neuroimmunology research and development has been marked by substantial advances, particularly in the treatment of neuroimmunological diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease. With more than 20 drugs approved for multiple sclerosis alone, treatment has become more personalised. The approval of disease-modifying therapies, particularly those targeting B cells, has highlighted the role of immunotherapeutic interventions in the management of these diseases. Despite these successes, challenges remain, particularly for patients who do not respond to conventional therapies, underscoring the need for innovative approaches. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: The approval of monoclonal antibodies, such as ocrelizumab and ofatumumab, which target CD20, and inebilizumab, which targets CD19, for the treatment of various neuroimmunological diseases reflects progress in the understanding and management of B-cell activity. However, the limitations of these therapies in halting disease progression or activity in patients with multiple sclerosis or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders have prompted the exploration of cell-based therapies, particularly chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Initially successful in the treatment of B cell-derived malignancies, CAR T cells offer a novel therapeutic mechanism by directly targeting and eliminating B cells, potentially overcoming the shortcomings of antibody-mediated B cell depletion. WHERE NEXT?: The use of CAR T cells in autoimmune diseases and B cell-driven neuroimmunological diseases shows promise as a targeted and durable option. CAR T cells act autonomously, penetrating deep tissue and effectively depleting B cells, especially in the CNS. Although the therapeutic potential of CAR T cells is substantial, their application faces hurdles such as complex logistics and management of therapy-associated toxic effects. Ongoing and upcoming clinical trials will be crucial in determining the safety, efficacy, and applicability of CAR T cells. As research progresses, CAR T cell therapy has the potential to transform treatment for patients with neuroimmunological diseases. It could offer extended periods of remission and a new standard in the management of autoimmune and neuroimmunological disorders.

Study on clinical features and factors related to long-term outcomes of antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: To delineate the clinical characteristics of antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and to investigate factors associated with long-term outcomes among antibody-negative AE. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with antibody-negative AE were recruited from January 2016 to December 2022 at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. The study assessed the long-term outcomes of antibody-negative AE using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE). Predictors influencing long-term outcomes were subsequently analyzed. External validation of RAPID scores (refractory status epilepticus [RSE], age of onset ≥60 years, ANPRA [antibody-negative probable autoimmune encephalitis], infratentorial involvement, and delay of immunotherapy ≥1 month) was performed. RESULTS: In total, 100 (47 females and 53 males) antibody-negative AE patients were enrolled in this study, with approximately 49 (49%) experiencing unfavorable long-term outcomes (mRS scores ≥3). Antibody-negative AE was subcategorized into ANPRA, autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Psychiatric symptoms were prevalent in LE and ANPRA subtypes, while weakness and gait instability/dystonia were predominant in the ADEM subtype. Higher peak CASE scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.846, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.163-2.930, p = 0.009) and initiating immunotherapy within 30 days (OR 0.210, 95% CI: 0.046-0.948, p = 0.042) were correlated with long-term outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis returned that the RAPID scores cutoff of 1.5 best discriminated the group with poor long-term outcomes (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 56.9%). INTERPRETATION: The ANPRA subtype exhibited poorer long-term outcomes compared to LE and ADEM subtypes, and early immunotherapy was crucial for improving long-term outcomes in antibody-negative AE. The use of RAPID scoring could aid in guiding clinical decision making.

Autoimmune and inflammatory neurological disorders in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review summarizes the diagnostic approach to autoimmune encephalitis (AE) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and provides practical guidance on therapeutic management. RECENT FINDINGS: Autoimmune encephalitis represents a group of immune-mediated brain diseases associated with antibodies that are pathogenic against central nervous system proteins. Recent findings suggests that the diagnosis of AE requires a multidisciplinary approach including appropriate recognition of common clinical syndromes, brain imaging and electroencephalography to confirm focal pathology, and cerebrospinal fluid and serum tests to rule out common brain infections, and to detect autoantibodies. ICU admission may be necessary at AE onset because of altered mental status, refractory seizures, and/or dysautonomia. Early management in ICU includes prompt initiation of immunotherapy, detection and treatment of seizures, and supportive care with neuromonitoring. In parallel, screening for neoplasm should be systematically performed. Despite severe presentation, epidemiological studies suggest that functional recovery is likely under appropriate therapy, even after prolonged ICU stays. CONCLUSION: AE and related disorders are increasingly recognized in the ICU population. Critical care physicians should be aware of these conditions and consider them early in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with unexplained encephalopathy. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for diagnosis, ICU management, specific therapy, and prognostication.

New insights into neuropathology and pathogenesis of autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein meningoencephalomyelitis.

Anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) meningoencephalomyelitis (autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy) is a new autoimmune central nervous system (CNS) disease diagnosable by the presence of anti-GFAP autoantibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid and presents as meningoencephalomyelitis in the majority of patients. Only few neuropathological reports are available and little is known about the pathogenic mechanisms. We performed a histopathological study of two autopsies and nine CNS biopsies of patients with anti-GFAP autoantibodies and found predominantly a lymphocytic and in one autopsy case a granulomatous inflammatory phenotype. Inflammatory infiltrates were composed of B and T cells, including tissue-resident memory T cells. Although obvious astrocytic damage was absent in the GFAP-staining, we found cytotoxic T cell-mediated reactions reflected by the presence of CD8+/perforin+/granzyme A/B+ cells, polarized towards astrocytes. MHC-class-I was upregulated in reactive astrocytes of all biopsies and two autopsies but not in healthy controls. Importantly, we observed a prominent immunoreactivity of astrocytes with the complement factor C4d. Finally, we provided insight into an early phase of GFAP autoimmunity in an autopsy of a pug dog encephalitis that was characterized by marked meningoencephalitis with selective astrocytic damage with loss of GFAP and AQP4 in the lesions.Our histopathological findings indicate that a cytotoxic T cell-mediated immune reaction is present in GFAP autoimmunity. Complement C4d deposition on astrocytes could either represent the cause or consequence of astrocytic reactivity. Selective astrocytic damage is prominent in the early phase of GFAP autoimmunity in a canine autopsy case, but mild or absent in subacute and chronic stages in human disease, probably due to the high regeneration potential of astrocytes. The lymphocytic and granulomatous phenotypes might reflect different stages of lesion development or patient-specific modifications of the immune response. Future studies will be necessary to investigate possible implications of pathological subtypes for clinical disease course and therapeutic strategies.

Neurological, psychiatric, and sleep investigations after treatment of anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitis in Spain: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder that can be treated with immunotherapy, but the symptoms that remain after treatment have not been well described. We aimed to characterise the clinical features of patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis for 1 year starting within the first year after initial immunotherapy. METHODS: For this prospective cohort study, we recruited patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis as soon as possible after they had received conventional immunotherapy for initial symptoms; patients were recruited from 21 hospitals in Spain. Patients were excluded if they had an interval of more than 1 year since initial immunotherapy, had pre-existing neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders, or were unable to travel to Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain). Patients visited Hospital Clínic de Barcelona on three occasions-the first at study entry (visit 1), the second 6 months later (visit 2), and the third 12 months after the initial visit (visit 3). They underwent neuropsychiatric and videopolysomnography assessments at each visit. Healthy participants who were matched for age and sex and recruited from Hospital Clínic de Barcelona underwent the same investigations at study entry and at 12 months. Cross-sectional comparisons of clinical features between groups were done with conditional logistic regression, and binary logistic regression was used to assess associations between cognitive outcomes at 12 months and clinical features before initial immunotherapy and at study entry. FINDINGS: Between May 1, 2019, and Sept 30, 2022, 42 participants agreed to be included in this study. 24 (57%) participants had anti-LGI1 encephalitis (mean age 63 years [SD 12]; 13 [54%] were female and 11 [46%] were male) and 18 (43%) were healthy individuals (mean age 62 years [10]; 11 [61%] were female and seven [39%] were male). At visit 1 (median 88 days [IQR 67-155] from initiation of immunotherapy), all 24 patients had one or more symptoms; 20 (83%) patients had cognitive deficits, 20 (83%) had psychiatric symptoms, 14 (58%) had insomnia, 12 (50%) had rapid eye movement (REM)-sleep behaviour disorder, nine (38%) had faciobrachial dystonic seizures, and seven (29%) had focal onset seizures. Faciobrachial dystonic seizures were unnoticed in four (17%) of 24 patients and focal onset seizures were unnoticed in five (21%) patients. At visit 1, videopolysomnography showed that 19 (79%) patients, but no healthy participants, had disrupted sleep structure (p=0·013); 15 (63%) patients and four (22%) healthy participants had excessive fragmentary myoclonus (p=0·039), and nine (38%) patients, but no healthy participants, had myokymic discharges (p=0·0051). These clinical and videopolysomnographic features led to additional immunotherapy in 15 (63%) of 24 patients, which resulted in improvement of these features in all 15 individuals. However, at visit 3, 13 (65%) of 20 patients continued to have cognitive deficits. Persistent cognitive deficits at visit 3 were associated with no use of rituximab before visit 1 (odds ratio [OR] 4·0, 95% CI 1·5-10·7; p=0·0015), REM sleep without atonia at visit 1 (2·2, 1·2-4·2; p=0·043), and presence of LGI1 antibodies in serum at visit 1 (11·0, 1·1-106·4; p=0·038). INTERPRETATION: Unsuspected but ongoing clinical and videopolysomnography alterations are common in patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis during the first year or more after initial immunotherapy. Recognising these alterations is important as they are treatable, can be used as outcome measures in clinical trials, and might influence cognitive outcome. FUNDING: Fundació La Caixa.

Antibody-Negative Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) refers to a heterogenous group of inflammatory CNS diseases. Subgroups with specified neural autoantibodies are more homogeneous in presentation, trigger factors, outcome, and response to therapy. However, a considerable fraction of patients has AE features but does not harbor detectable autoantibodies and is referred to as antibody-negative AE. Our aim was to describe clinical features, trigger factors, treatments, and outcome of a cohort of comprehensively tested antibody-negative AE patients. METHODS: This retrospective monocentric study recruited adult patients whose serum and/or CSF was sent to our tertiary center for neural antibody testing between 2011 and 2020, who entered the diagnostic algorithm as possible antibody-negative AE and had the following: (1) probable antibody-negative AE, definite antibody-negative acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), or definite autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE) according to diagnostic criteria; (2) available data on MRI of the brain, CSF, and EEG; and (3) stored serum and/or CSF samples. These samples were reanalyzed using a comprehensive combination of cell-based and tissue-based assays. RESULTS: Of 2,250 patients tested, 33 (1.5%) were classified as possible antibody-negative AE. Of these, 5 were found to have antibodies by comprehensive testing, 5 fulfilled the criteria of probable AE (3F:2M, median age 67, range 42-67), 4 of definite autoimmune LE (2F:2M, median age 45.5, range 27-60 years), one of definite antibody-negative ADEM, 2 of Hashimoto encephalopathy, one had no samples available for additional testing, and 15 had no further categorization. Of 10 probable/definite AE/LE/ADEM, one had a malignancy and none of them received an alternative diagnosis until the end of follow-up (median 18 months). In total, 80% (8/10) of patients received immunotherapy including corticosteroids, and 6/10 (60%) patients received rituximab, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, or IV immunoglobulins. Five (50%) patients improved, one (10%) stabilized, one (10%) worsened, and 3 (30%) died. All deaths were considered to be related to encephalitis. We did not observe differences of immunotherapy-treated patients in likelihood of improvement with or without nonsteroidal immunotherapy (with 2/6, without 1/2). DISCUSSION: Antibody-negative AE should be diagnosed only after comprehensive testing. Diagnostic effort is important because many patients benefit from immunotherapy and some have malignancies.

An updated review of pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with Streptococcus/pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome, also known as idiopathic autoimmune encephalitis: What the allergist should know.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome, further subcategorized as pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcus, is a form of idiopathic autoimmune encephalitis (IAE). Poststreptococcal autoimmunity seen in Idiopathic autoimmune encephalitis manifests as various neuropsychiatric symptoms such as obsessive rituals, tics, anxiety, depression, and many others. Idiopathic autoimmune encephalitis has clinically heterogeneous phenotypes that make accurate diagnosing difficult, although diagnostic testing such as the Cunningham Panel increases the likelihood of finding effective treatments. Current recommended treatments include psychiatric medication, behavioral intervention, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory therapy, and immunomodulating therapy. OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated review on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorder associated with streptococcus and pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric syndrome, also referred to as IAE. RESULTS: Information from 47 sources was used to outline current knowledge of IAE pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and epidemiology, and to outline diagnostic recommendations and current treatment guidelines. Gaps in knowledge, in addition to current controversy, were also outlined to provide a thorough background of this condition and future needs for IAE research. CONCLUSION: Owing to the complexity and variability in ways patients with IAE may present to the allergist/immunologist office, an interdisciplinary approach is imperative to provide patients with the best medical care. Still, more research is needed to further elucidate the mechanism(s) and optimal treatment algorithm for IAE to facilitate broader recognition and acceptance of this condition by the medical community.

Plasmapheresis Versus Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Patients With Autoimmune Neuromuscular and Neuro-immunological Conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Plasmapheresis (PLEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) are commonly used to treat autoimmune neuromuscular disorders, including myasthenia gravis, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, and other autoimmune neurological disorders. The side effect profiles of these therapies vary, and concern has been raised regarding the safety of PLEX in the elderly population. In this study, we have examined the pattern of PLEX and IVIg use for autoimmune neurological disorders at a single facility and in a national database, focusing on the complications in elderly patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients at our institution receiving PLEX or IVIg for any autoimmune neuromuscular or neuro-immunological disease. Next, we analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database to confirm the trend in IVIg and PLEX use from 2012 to 2018 for a set of neuromuscular and neuro-immunological primary diagnoses. RESULTS: IVIg was overall favored over PLEX. The adverse effects were similar among elderly patients (age ≥65 years) compared with younger patients (<65 years) in our institution, even after adequate matching of patients based on age, sex, and medical history. We examined the National Inpatient Sample dataset and noted increasingly higher frequency of IVIg use, consistent with the findings from our institution or facility. CONCLUSIONS: Both PLEX and IVIg are safe therapeutic choices in adult patients with autoimmune neuromuscular disorders and other neuro-immunological diseases and can be safely administered in the appropriate clinical setting.

Overlapping Epstein-Barr virus encephalitis and autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy.

We describe three cases of overlapping Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) Encephalitis and Autoimmune Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy (GFAP-A). The three cases all presented with initial symptoms of fever, headache, coma, and posture tremor of the upper limbs, then followed by limb weakness and dysuria. All of the three cases were on ventilators. Case 1 and 2 improved dramatically after intravenous methylprednisoloneand immunoglobulin treatment. However, case 3 presented dyspneic, and died from gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The GFAP-A triggered by EBV intracranial infection could initially masquerade as EBV encephalitis only, and the detection of GFAP antibody is essential for differentiation.

What is autoimmune encephalitis-associated epilepsy? Proposal of a practical definition.

Seizures resulting from cerebral autoimmunity are either acutely symptomatic in the context of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) with neural surface antibodies, or they are indicative of an enduring predisposition to seizures, that is, epilepsy. Here, we propose a practical definition for autoimmune encephalitis-associated epilepsy (AEAE): Seizures associated with antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase, paraneoplastic syndromes, or Rasmussen encephalitis are classified as AEAE. AEAE secondary to AIE with antibodies against the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1, contactin-associated protein-2, or γ-aminobutyric acid-B receptor can be diagnosed if the following criteria are met: seizures persist for at least 2 years after immunotherapy initiation; no signs of encephalitis on magnetic resonance imaging and no fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography hypermetabolism; normal cerebrospinal fluid cell count; and a substantial decrease in antibody titers. This classification corresponds to different disease mechanisms. While AIE results from the pathogenic effects of neural antibodies, AEAE is probably the consequence of encephalitis-related tissue damage and thereby mainly structurally mediated. The distinction between AIE and AEAE also has practical consequences: In AIE, immunotherapy is usually highly beneficial, whereas anti-seizure medication has little effect. In AEAE, immunotherapy is less promising and the usual anti-seizure interventions are preferable. In addition, the diagnosis of AEAE has social consequences in terms of driving and professional limitations.

Clinical characteristics of Leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 antibody-mediated autoimmune encephalitis in a 6-year-old girl: case report and literature reviews.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune encephalitis related to the leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1(LGI1) antibody is the most prevalent in older adults, manifesting as seizures, faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS), cognitive impairment, memory disturbance, hyponatremia and neuropsychiatric disorders. However the data pertaining to children affected by the disease is still limited. CASE PRESENTATION AND LITERATURE REVIEWS: This study presents a detailed report of a 6-year-old Chinese girl who experienced nose aches and faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS). Electrolyte testing revealed that she had hyponatremia and brain MRI showed an abnormality in the left temporal pole. Additionally, anti-LGI1 antibodies were detected in both her serum (1:100) and CSF (1:30). The patient was treated with immunotherapy and symptom management, which proved effective. Furthermore, we provide a summary of 25 pediatric cases of anti-LGI1 encephalitis. Pediatric patients rarely exhibited FBDS and hyponatremia, and some cases presented with isolated syndromes. But the therapeutic outcomes of pediatric patients were generally good. CONCLUSIONS: In this report, we describe a patient who developed a rare symptom of nose aches possibly as one of symptoms of anti-LGI1 encephalitis, which highlights the possibility of atypical symptoms in children that may be misdiagnosed. Reviewing the literature, the clinical features differed between pediatric and adult cases. Therefore, it is crucial to collect and analyze data from more cases to promote accurate diagnosis and timely treatment.