Clinical evaluation of droplet digital PCR in the early identification of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department: a prospective observational study.

Background: Rapid and accurate diagnosis of the causative agents is essential for clinical management of bloodstream infections (BSIs) that might induce sepsis/septic shock. A considerable number of suspected sepsis patients initially enter the health-care system through an emergency department (ED), hence it is vital to establish an early strategy to recognize sepsis and initiate prompt care in ED. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical value of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay in suspected sepsis patients in the ED. Methods: This was a prospective single-centered observational study including patients admitted to the ED from 25 October 2022 to 3 June 2023 with suspected BSIs screened by Modified Shapiro Score (MSS) score. The comparison between ddPCR and blood culture (BC) was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ddPCR for BSIs. Meanwhile, correlative analysis between ddPCR and the inflammatory and prognostic-related biomarkers were conducted to explore the relevance. Further, the health economic evaluation of the ddPCR was analyzed. Results: 258 samples from 228 patients, with BC and ddPCR performed simultaneously, were included in this study. We found that ddPCR results were positive in 48.13% (103 of 214) of episodes, with identification of 132 pathogens. In contrast, BC only detected 18 positives, 88.89% of which were identified by ddPCR. When considering culture-proven BSIs, ddPCR shows an overall sensitivity of 88.89% and specificity of 55.61%, the optimal diagnostic power for quantifying BSI through ddPCR is achieved with a copy cutoff of 155.5. We further found that ddPCR exhibited a high accuracy especially in liver abscess patients. Among all the identified virus by ddPCR, EBV has a substantially higher positive rate with a link to immunosuppression. Moreover, the copies of pathogens in ddPCR were positively correlated with various markers of inflammation, coagulation, immunity as well as prognosis. With high sensitivity and specificity, ddPCR facilitates precision antimicrobial stewardship and reduces health care costs. Conclusions: The multiplexed ddPCR delivers precise and quantitative load data on the causal pathogen, offers the ability to monitor the patient's condition and may serve as early warning of sepsis in time-urgent clinical situations as ED. Importance: Early detection and effective administration of antibiotics are essential to improve clinical outcomes for those with life-threatening infection in the emergency department. ddPCR, an emerging tool for rapid and sensitive pathogen identification used as a precise bedside test, has developed to address the current challenges of BSI diagnosis and precise treatment. It characterizes sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and absolute quantifications without a standard curve. ddPCR can detect causative pathogens and related resistance genes in patients with suspected BSIs within a span of three hours. In addition, it can identify polymicrobial BSIs and dynamically monitor changes in pathogenic microorganisms in the blood and can be used to evaluate antibiotic efficacy and survival prognosis. Moreover, the copies of pathogens in ddPCR were positively correlated with various markers of inflammation, coagulation, immunity. With high sensitivity and specificity, ddPCR facilitates precision antimicrobial stewardship and reduces health care costs.

Short-term culture for rapid identification by mass spectrometry and automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing from positive bottles.

BACKGROUND: Early and appropriate antibiotic treatment improves the clinical outcome of patients with sepsis. There is an urgent need for rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria that cause bloodstream infection (BSI). Rapid ID and AST can be achieved by short-term incubation on solid medium of positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) and the BD M50 system. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of rapid method compared to traditional method. METHODS: A total of 124 mono-microbial samples were collected. Positive blood culture samples were short-term incubated on blood agar plates and chocolate agar plates for 5 ∼ 7 h, and the rapid ID and AST were achieved through Zybio EXS2000 MS and BD M50 System, respectively. RESULTS: Compared with the traditional 24 h culture for ID, this rapid method can shorten the cultivation time to 5 ∼ 7 h. Accurate organism ID was achieved in 90.6% of Gram-positive bacteria (GP), 98.5% of Gram-negative bacteria (GN), and 100% of fungi. The AST resulted in the 98.5% essential agreement (EA) and 97.1% category agreements (CA) in NMIC-413, 99.4% EA and 98.9% CA in PMIC-92, 100% both EA and CA in SMIC-2. Besides, this method can be used for 67.2% (264/393) of culture bottles during routine work. The mean turn-around time (TAT) for obtaining final results by conventional method is approximately 72.6 ± 10.5 h, which is nearly 24 h longer than the rapid method. CONCLUSIONS: The newly described method is expected to provide faster and reliable ID and AST results, making it an important tool for rapid management of blood cultures (BCs). In addition, this rapid method can be used to process most positive blood cultures, enabling patients to receive rapid and effective treatment.

Whole-blood culture-derived cytokine combinations for the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Introduction: The diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) disease and TB infection (TBI) remains a challenge, and there is a need for non-invasive and blood-based methods to differentiate TB from conditions mimicking TB (CMTB), TBI, and healthy controls (HC). We aimed to determine whether combination of cytokines and established biomarkers could discriminate between 1) TB and CMTB 2) TB and TBI 3) TBI and HC. Methods: We used hemoglobin, total white blood cell count, neutrophils, monocytes, C-reactive protein, and ten Meso Scale Discovery analyzed cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, interferon (IFN)-É£, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α) in TruCulture whole blood tubes stimulated by lipopolysaccharides (LPS), zymosan (ZYM), anti-CD3/28 (CD3), and unstimulated (Null) to develop three index tests able to differentiate TB from CMTB and TBI, and TBI from HC. Results: In 52 persons with CMTB (n=9), TB (n=23), TBI (n=10), and HC (n=10), a combination of cytokines (LPS-IFN-É£, ZYM-IFN-É£, ZYM-TNF-α, ZYM-IL-1ß, LPS-IL-4, and ZYM-IL-6) and neutrophil count could differentiate TB from CMTB with a sensitivity of 52.2% (95% CI: 30.9%-73.4%) and a specificity of 100 % (66.4%-100%). Null- IFN-É£, Null-IL-8, CD3-IL-6, CD3-IL-8, CD3-IL-13, and ZYM IL-1b discriminated TB from TBI with a sensitivity of 73.9% (56.5% - 91.3%) and a specificity of 100% (69.2-100). Cytokines and established biomarkers failed to differentiate TBI from HC with ≥ 98% specificity. Discussion: Selected cytokines may serve as blood-based add-on tests to detect TB in a low-endemic setting, although these results need to be validated.

[Microorganisms isolated from blood cultures and resistance profile in children with cancer and high-risk febrile neutropenia. Red PINDA, Chile, 2016-2021]. / Microorganismos aislados de hemocultivos y su perfil de resistencia en niños con cáncer y neutropenia febril de alto riesgo. Red PINDA, Chile, 2016-2021.

Bacteremia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer and episodes of high-risk febrile neutropenia (HRFN). OBJECTIVE: To identify the frequency of microorganisms isolated from blood cultures (BC) and their antimicrobial resistance (R) profile in children with HRFN, compared with the same data from previous studies of the same group. METHOD: Prospective, multicenter, epidemiological surveillance study of microorganisms isolated from BC in patients under 18 years of age, from 7 PINDA network hospitals, between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: 284 episodes of HRFN with positive BC were analyzed out of 1091 enrolled episodes (26%). Median age 7.2 years [3.0-12.3]. The main isolates were gram-negative bacilli (GNB) 49.2%, gram-positive cocci (GPC) 43.8%, and fungi 3.6%. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were viridans group Streptococci (VGS) (25.8%), Escherichia coli (19.8%), Pseudomonas spp. (11.2%), Klebsiella spp. (10.9%), and coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS) (10.9%). There was an increase in R to third-generation cephalosporins (p = 0.011) in GNB and to oxacillin in CoNS (p = 0.00), as well as a decrease in R to amikacin in non-fermenting GNB (p = 0.02) and to penicillin in VGS (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: VGS is the main agent isolated in BC from pediatric patients with cancer and episodes of HRFN, followed by E. coli, Pseudomonas spp., and Klebsiella spp. Having epidemiological surveillance of microorganisms isolated from BC and their antimicrobial R profile is essential to favor the rational use of antimicrobials.

Appropriate use of blood cultures in the emergency department through machine learning (ABC): study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

INTRODUCTION: The liberal use of blood cultures in emergency departments (EDs) leads to low yields and high numbers of false-positive results. False-positive, contaminated cultures are associated with prolonged hospital stays, increased antibiotic usage and even higher hospital mortality rates. This trial aims to investigate whether a recently developed and validated machine learning model for predicting blood culture outcomes can safely and effectively guide clinicians in withholding unnecessary blood culture analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing current practice with a machine learning-guided approach. The primary objective is to determine whether the machine learning based approach is non-inferior to standard practice based on 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include hospital length-of stay and hospital admission rates. Other outcomes include model performance and antibiotic usage. Participants will be recruited in the EDs of multiple hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 7584 participants will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Possible participants will receive verbal information and a paper information brochure regarding the trial. They will be given at least 1 hour consideration time before providing informed consent. Research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. This study has been approved by the Amsterdam University Medical Centers' local medical ethics review committee (No 22.0567). The study will be conducted in concordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act, General Data Privacy Regulation and Medical Device Regulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06163781.

A Case of Bacteremia Caused by Raoultella planticola Direct Identification from Blood Culture by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.

Background: Raoultella planticola is an uncommon gram-negative organism found in the environment. Patients and Methods: The patient, an 81-year-old female who had undergone total cystectomy and bilateral ureteral stoma surgery, presented to the hospital with a fever. It was determined that Raoultella planticola was responsible for the bacteremia. Results: Rapid identification of bacteria using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in blood culture samples and appropriate antibacterial treatment was begun and the patient was discharged three days later. Conclusions: This case emphasizes the presence of a rare pathogen as the cause of bacteremia and underscores the importance of utilizing rapid methods for bacterial identification to establish an accurate diagnosis.

Suppression PCR-Based Selective Enrichment Sequencing for Pathogen and Antimicrobial Resistance Detection on Cell-Free DNA in Sepsis-A Targeted, Blood Culture-Independent Approach for Rapid Pathogen and Resistance Diagnostics in Septic Patients.

Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome triggered by infection and accompanied by high mortality, with antimicrobial resistances (AMRs) further escalating clinical challenges. The rapid and reliable detection of causative pathogens and AMRs are key factors for fast and appropriate treatment, in order to improve outcomes in septic patients. However, current sepsis diagnostics based on blood culture is limited by low sensitivity and specificity while current molecular approaches fail to enter clinical routine. Therefore, we developed a suppression PCR-based selective enrichment sequencing approach (SUPSETS), providing a molecular method combining multiplex suppression PCR with Nanopore sequencing to identify most common sepsis-causative pathogens and AMRs using plasma cell-free DNA. Applying only 1 mL of plasma, we targeted eight pathogens across three kingdoms and ten AMRs in a proof-of-concept study. SUPSETS was successfully tested in an experimental research study on the first ten clinical samples and revealed comparable results to clinical metagenomics while clearly outperforming blood culture. Several clinically relevant AMRs could be additionally detected. Furthermore, SUPSETS provided first pathogen and AMR-specific sequencing reads within minutes of starting sequencing, thereby potentially decreasing time-to-results to 11-13 h and suggesting diagnostic potential in sepsis.

Performance of ePlex® blood culture identification panels in clinical isolates and characterization of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities.

We assessed the performance of GenMark's ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels for overall agreement of organism identification and resistance mechanism detection with standard microbiologic methods. This study included patients with a positive blood culture from May 2020 to January 2021. The primary outcomes were to assess concordance of ePlex® organism identification with standard identification methods and concordance of ePlex® genotypic resistance mechanism detection with standard phenotypic susceptibility testing. Secondary outcomes included panel specific performance and characterization of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities. The overall identification concordance rate in 1276 positive blood cultures was 98.1%. The overall concordance for the presence of resistance markers was 98.2% and concordance for the absence of resistance markers was 100%. A majority of ePlex® results (69.5%) represented opportunities for potential antimicrobial stewardship intervention. High concordance rates between the ePlex® BCID panels and standard identification and susceptibility methods enable utilization of results to guide rapid antimicrobial optimization.

Using the CLSI rAST breakpoints of Enterobacterales in positive blood cultures.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to provide the clinic with rapid and accurate results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the treatment of patients with bloodstream infections. To achieve this, we applied the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) blood culture direct rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (rAST) to assess the susceptibility of the most common Enterobacterales found in blood cultures. METHODS: In this study, we utilized the CLSI blood culture direct rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test to assess the susceptibility (rAST) of the most common Enterobacterales present in blood cultures. We chose this method for its simplicity in analysis, and our aim was to predict minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) using the rAST. As a benchmark, we assumed that Broth Macrodilution method (BMD) results were 100% accurate. For data evaluation, we employed the terms categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), and major errors (ME). RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that the CLSI rAST method is reliable for rapidly determining the in vitro susceptibility of Enterobacterales to common antimicrobial drugs in bloodstream infections. We achieved a concordance rate of 90% in classification within a 10-hour timeframe. We identified a total of 112 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) strains, and there was no significant difference in the detection rate of CRE at 6, 10, and 16 hours. This suggests that CRE can be identified as early as 6 hours. CONCLUSION: The CLSI rAST is a valuable tool that can be utilized in clinical practice to quickly determine the susceptibility of Enterobacterales to antimicrobial drugs within 10 hours. This capability can greatly assist in the clinical management of patients with bloodstream infections.

Accelerated microbial identification "directly" from positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS: Local clinical laboratory challenges.

Rapid identification of microbial pathogens "directly" from positive blood cultures (PBCs) is critical for prompt initiation of empirical antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes. Towards higher microbial identification rates, we modified a published initial serum separator tubes-based MALDI-TOF-MS protocol, for blood culture specimens received at a non-hospital based standalone diagnostic laboratory, Bangalore, India: (a) "Initial" protocol #1: From 28 PBCs, identification= 39% (Gram-negative= 43%: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Gram-positive: 36%: Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus haemolyticus); mis-identification= 14%; non-identification= 47%. (b) "Modified" protocol #2: Quality controls (ATCC colonies spiked in negative blood cultures) From 7 analysis, identification= 100% (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Klebsiella oxytoca, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus); From 7 PBCs, identification= 57%; mis-identification= 14%; non-identification= 29%. Microbial preparations of highest quality and quantity for proteomic analysis and separate spectra matching reference databases for colonies and PBCs are needed for best clinical utility.

Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates.

BACKGROUND: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) facilitates the optimization of antimicrobial therapy, preventing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes. QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) is a rapid AST platform based on microfluidic chip technology that performs AST directly using positive blood culture broth (PBCB). This study evaluated the performance of QMAC-dRAST for Gram-negative bacteria using PBCB and subcultured colony isolates, comparing it with that of VITEK 2 (bioMérieux, France) using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method. METHODS: We included 141 Gram-negative blood culture isolates from patients with BSI and 12 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales spiked into blood culture bottles. QMAC-dRAST performance was evaluated using PBCB and colony isolates, whereas VITEK 2 and BMD were tested only on colony isolates. RESULTS: For PBCB, QMAC-dRAST achieved 92.1% categorical agreement (CA), 95.3% essential agreement (EA), with 1.8% very major errors (VMEs), 3.5% major errors (MEs), and 5.2% minor errors (mEs). With colony isolates, it exhibited 92.5% CA and 95.1% EA, with 2.0% VMEs, 3.2% MEs, and 4.8% mEs. VITEK 2 showed 94.1% CA and 96.0% EA, with 4.3% VMEs, 0.4% MEs, and 4.3% mEs. QMAC-dRAST yielded elevated error rates for specific antimicrobial agents, with high VMEs for carbapenems and aminoglycosides. The median time to result for QMAC-dRAST was 5.9 h for PBCB samples and 6.1 h for subcultured colony isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The QMAC-dRAST system demonstrated considerable strengths and comparable performance to the VITEK 2 system; however, challenges were discerned with specific antimicrobial agents, underlining a necessity for improvement.

Rapid Direct Identification of Microbial Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Positive Blood Cultures Using a Fully Automated Multiplex PCR Assay.

This study assessed the performance of the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel in identifying microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles in positive blood cultures (BCs) and its influence on turnaround time (TAT) compared with conventional culture methods. We obtained 117 positive BCs, of these, 102 (87.2%) were correctly identified using BCID2. The discordance was due to off-panel pathogens detected by culture (n = 13), and additional pathogens identified by BCID2 (n = 2). On-panel pathogen concordance between the conventional culture and BCID2 methods was 98.1% (102/104). The conventional method detected 19 carbapenemase-producing organisms, 14 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, 18 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp., and four vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. BCID2 correctly predicted 53 (96.4%) of 55 phenotypic resistance patterns by detecting AMR genes. The TAT for BCID2 was significantly lower than that for the conventional method. BCID2 rapidly identifies pathogens and AMR genes in positive BCs.

Detection of KPC directly from positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF: From research to the clinical microbiology laboratory routine.

Bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) are a subject of major clinical concern, mainly those associated with carbapenemase-producing isolates. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been proposed to detect specific ß-lactamases, including KPC. We aimed to detect KPC enzyme directly from positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS. Overall, 146 clinical Gram-negative bacilli (46 CR-GNB) recovered from consecutive blood cultures were evaluated. Proteins were extracted using formic acid, isopropyl alcohol, and water and spotted onto a steel target plate using the double-layer sinapinic acid method. The relative ions intensity ≥120 arbitrary units (a.u.) of a peak close to 28,700 m/z indicated the presence of KPC. The results were compared to HRM-qPCR methodology. This specific peak was observed in 11/14 blood bottles with blaKPC positive isolates (78.6% sensitivity), with 3 false-positive results (97.7% specificity). Analysis from colonies reached identical sensitivity (78.6%), but higher specificity (100%). The detection of KPC peaks directly from positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF MS is feasible and rapid. It's excellent specificity indicates that positive results are consistently associated with the presence of a KPC producer in positive blood culture.

A multisite validation of a two hours antibiotic susceptibility flow cytometry assay directly from positive blood cultures.

BACKGROUND: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is urgently needed to provide safer treatment to counteract antimicrobial resistance. This is critical in septic patients, because resistance increases empiric therapy uncertainty and the risk of a poor outcome. We validate a novel 2h flow cytometry AST assay directly from positive blood cultures (PBC) by using a room temperature stable FASTgramneg and FASTgrampos kits (FASTinov® Porto, Portugal) in three sites: FASTinov (site-1), Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain (site-2) and Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal (site-3). A total of 670 PBC were included: 333 spiked (site-1) and 337 clinical PBC (151 site-2 and 186 site-3): 367 gram-negative and 303 gram-positive. Manufacturer instructions were followed for sample preparation, panel inoculation, incubation (1h/37ºC) and flow cytometry analysis using CytoFlex (Site-1 and -2) or DxFlex (site-3) both instruments from Beckman-Coulter, USA. RESULTS: A proprietary software (bioFAST) was used to immediately generate a susceptibility report in less than 2 h. In parallel, samples were processed according to reference AST methods (disk diffusion and/or microdilution) and interpreted with EUCAST and CLSI criteria. Additionally, ten samples were spiked in all sites for inter-laboratory reproducibility. Sensitivity and specificity were >95% for all antimicrobials. Reproducibility was 96.8%/95.0% for FASTgramneg and 95.1%/95.1% for FASTgrampos regarding EUCAST/CLSI criteria, respectively. CONCLUSION: FASTinov® kits consistently provide ultra-rapid AST in 2h with high accuracy and reproducibility on both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. This technology creates a new paradigm in bacterial infection management and holds the potential to significantly impact septic patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship.

Use of flow cytometry method to detect contaminations of platelet suspensions.

In this study, it was aimed to investigate bacterial contamination in apheresis platelet suspensions (APS) by automated blood culture system and flow cytometry method (FCM).33 spiked APS each using 11 bacterial strains (5 standard strains, 6 clinical isolates), were prepared in three different dilutions (1-10, 10-50, 50-100 cfu/mL), incubated in two different temperatures (35-37 °C and 22-24 °C) and different incubation times (18-96 h) evaluated by FCM. This three different dilutions were also inoculated into special platelet culture bottles (BacT/ALERT® BPA) and loaded into the blood culture system. Additionally 80 APSs routinely prepared in the Transfusion Center were evaluated by both FCM and the blood culture system. Platelets were lysed by freeze-thaw method.All spiked samples were positive with BacT/ALERT® BPA in 12-18 h. In 96 h incubation at 22-24 °C, the presence of bacteria was detected by FCM in all other samples (31/33) except low dilutions (1-10 and 10-100 CFU/ml) of K.pneumoniae standard strain. In the 35-37 °C, the presence of bacteria was detected by FCM in all samples (33/33) after 48 h of incubation. In routine APS one sample detected as positive (Bacillus simplex) with BacT/ALERT® BPA and no positivity was detected by FCM.The freeze-thaw method, which we have optimized for the lysis of platelets, is very practical and can be easily applied. The BacT/ALERT® system has been found to be very sensitive in detecting bacterial contamination in PSs. Flow cytometry method has been found to be successful, fast, easy to use and low cost in detecting bacterial contamination in PSs.

Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing (RAST) of blood cultures in enterobacteria with inducible chromosomal AmpC-type ß-lactamase.

INTRODUCTION: Early and adequate treatment of bloodstream infections decreases patient morbidity and mortality. The objective is to develop a preliminary method for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing (RAST) in enterobacteria with inducible chromosomal AmpC. METHODS: RAST was performed directly on spiked blood cultures of 49 enterobacteria with inducible chromosomal AmpC. Results were read at 4, 6 and 8h of incubation. Commercial broth microdilution was considered the reference method. Disks of 10 antibiotics were evaluated. RESULTS: The proportion of readable tests at 4h was 85%. All RAST could be read at 6 and 8h. For most antibiotics, the S or R result at 4, 6 and 8h was greater than 80% after tentative breakpoints were established and Area of Technical Uncertainty was defined. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary method seems to be of practical use, although it should be extended to adjust the breakpoints and differentiate them by species.

Pitfalls of a Multiplex PCR Panel for Identification of Bloodstream Pathogens.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel (BCID; bioMerieux) for the detection of bloodstream pathogens. METHODS: From May to August 2022, up to 67 samples from positive blood cultures previously processed with BACTEC FX (BD) were collected and submitted to the BCID panel. BCID panel results were compared with traditional culture results. RESULTS: We tested 67 positive blood culture samples; 13 samples were from pediatric bottles of BACTEC Peds Plus/F media (BD). The overall sensitivity of the BCID panel was 89.9% (62/69; 95% CI, 80.2 - 95.3%). For blood-stream pathogens targeted by the BCID panel, sensitivity was 98.4% (62/63; 95% CI, 90.7 - > 99.9%). Interestingly, Proteus species were additionally detected in 6 samples from pediatric blood culture bottles. CONCLUSIONS: BCID demonstrated high clinical sensitivity for target pathogens, but positive findings for unexpected multiple targets or Proteus species require cautious interpretation to avoid false positives.

Changes in clinical parameters and inflammatory markers after blood culture collection facilitate early identification of positive culture in adult patients with COVID-19 and clinically suspected bloodstream infection.

OBJECTIVE: We explored whether changes in clinical parameters and inflammatory markers can facilitate early identification of positive blood culture in adult patients with COVID-19 and clinically suspected bloodstream infection (BSI). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study enrolled 20 adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit who underwent blood culture for clinically suspected BSI (February 2020-November 2021). We divided patients into positive (Pos) and negative blood culture groups. Clinical parameters and inflammatory markers were obtained from medical records between blood culture collection and the first positive or negative result and compared between groups on different days. RESULTS: Patients in the positive culture group had significantly older age and higher D-dimer, immunoglobulin 6 (IL-6), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score as well as lower albumin (ALB). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.865 for IL-6, D-dimer and ALB on the first day after blood culture collection; the AUC was 0.979 for IL-6, IL-10, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein on the second day after blood culture collection. CONCLUSION: Changes in clinical parameters and inflammatory markers after blood culture collection may facilitate early identification of positive culture in adult patients with COVID-19 and clinically suspected BSI.

Misidentification and misreporting of antibiotic resistance in Kluyvera bacteremia by blood culture molecular identification panels.

The use of molecular identification panels has advanced the diagnosis for blood stream infections with fast turnaround time and high accuracy. Yet, this technology cannot completely replace conventional blood culture and standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) given its limitations and occasional false results. Here we present two cases of bacteremia caused by Kluyvera. Its identification and antibiotic resistance were at least partially mispresented by blood culture molecular identification panels on ePlex, Verigene, and Biofire. The detection of CTX-M resistance marker did not align with the susceptibility to the third generation cephalosporins among a wide range of antibiotics for this organism. Conventional extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) testing was used to confirm the absence of ESBL. Caution should be taken when managing cases with CTX-M or ESBL detection in blood culture caused by uncommon pathogens. Conventional culture with microbial identification and standardized AST should continue to be the gold standard for routine patient care. IMPORTANCE: This is the first report that highlights the limitations of blood culture molecular identification panels on identifying Kluyvera and its associated antibiotic resistance patterns. Both the false identification and overreporting of antibiotic resistance could mislead the treatment for bacteremia caused by this pathogen. Patient isolation could have been avoided due to the lack of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) activity of the organism. This report emphasizes the importance of confirming rapid identification and antibiotic resistance by molecular technologies with standardized methods. It also provides insight into the development of new diagnostic panels.