Integrating omics techniques and culture-independent systems may improve the detection of persistent candidemia: data from an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Blood cultures have low sensitivity for candidemia. Sensitivity can be improved by the culture-independent system T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2). SeptiCyte RAPID is a host response assay quantifying the risk of infection-related inflammation through a scoring system (SeptiScore). We investigate the performance of SeptiScore in detecting persistent candidemia as defined by conventional cultures and T2. METHODS: This is a prospective multicentre observational study on patients with candidemia. Blood cultures and blood samples for assessment by T2 and SeptiCyte were collected for 4 consecutive days after the index culture. The performance of SeptiScore was explored to predict persistent candidemia as defined by (1) positive follow-up blood culture (2) either positive follow-up blood culture or T2 sample. RESULTS: 10 patients were enrolled including 34 blood collections assessed with the 3 methods. Overall, 4/34 (12%) follow-up blood cultures and 6/34 (18%) T2 samples were positive. A mixed model showed significantly higher SeptiScores associated with persistent candidemia when this was defined as either a positive follow-up blood culture or T2 sample (0.82, 95%CI 0.06 to 1.58) but not when this was defined as a positive follow-up blood culture only (-0.57, 95%CI -1.28 to 0.14). ROC curve for detection of persistent candidemia by SeptiScore at day 1 follow-up showed an AUC of 0.85 (95%CI 0.52-1.00) when candidemia was defined by positive follow-up blood culture, and an AUC of 1.00 (95%CI 1.00-1.00) when candidemia was defined according to both methods. CONCLUSION: Integrating transcriptome profiling with culture-independent systems and conventional cultures may increase our ability to diagnose persistent candidemia.

[Molecular diagnosis of bacteriaemia: benefits of using the FilmArray® BCID2 sepsis panel in a third level hospital]. / Diagnóstico molecular de bacteriemias: beneficios del empleo del panel de sepsis BCID2 de Filmarray® en un hospital de tercer nivel.

INTRODUCTION: Delay in initiating appropriate antimicrobial therapy prolongs hospitalization, increases in-hospital mortality, and raises economic costs. Currently, the identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria in positive blood cultures require a considerable amount of time. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the BCID2 FilmArray® (FA) panel on the timing of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and potential antimicrobial costs. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study focused on positive blood cultures in hospitalized patients. FA processing was conducted concurrently with routine sample processing. Changes in antibiotic treatments based on FA results were evaluated, and the reduction in antimicrobial therapy duration and associated cost savings were calculated. RESULTS: Eighty-seven bacteremia episodes were analysed. In 42 (48%) of them antimicrobial therapy was de-escalated to narrower spectrum agents, while in 7 (8%) therapy was escalated to broader spectrum antimicrobials. Additionally, in 8 (9%) antimicrobials were switched without changing spectrum and in 30 (34%) no changes were made based on FA results. Antimicrobial changes were made 2.3 days faster than with routine sample processing resulting in calculated potential savings of US$ 7408. CONCLUSION: The implementation of FA facilitated a faster administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy, leading to a reduction in the duration of broadspectrum empirical antimicrobial therapy and subsequent economic savings.

Introducción: Los retrasos en el tratamiento antimicrobiano adecuado de las bacteriemias prolongan la estadía hospitalaria, aumentan la mortalidad e incrementan los costos. Aún hoy en día se requiere un tiempo considerable para obtener la identificación y antibiograma de los microorganismos en los hemocultivos positivos. El objetivo fue evaluar el impacto de la implementación del panel BCID2 de FilmArray® (FA) sobre el tiempo de inicio de tratamientos antimicrobianos adecuados y sobre los costos potenciales de los mismos. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de los hemocultivos positivos de pacientes hospitalizados, procesados por FA y por metodología tradicional. Se evaluaron los cambios de antimicrobianos en base a los resultados del FA. Se calcularon los días de reducción de tratamiento antimicrobiano y el ahorro potencial en el uso de los mismos, teniendo en cuenta también los costos del FA. Resultados: Se analizaron 87 episodios de bacteriemia. En 42 (48.3%) de ellos se desescaló el tratamiento a antimicrobianos de menor espectro, en 7 (8%) se escaló a antimicrobianos de mayor espectro, en 8 (9.2%) se cambió el antimicrobiano sin variar el espectro y en 30 (34.5%) no se realizaron cambios con los resultados del FA. Los cambios de antimicrobianos se realizaron en promedio 2.3 días más rápido que con los métodos convencionales. Se calculó un ahorro potencial de US$ 7408. Conclusión: La implementación del panel BCID2 de FilmArray® permitió adecuar los tratamientos antimicrobianos más rápidamente acortando la duración de los tratamientos empíricos de amplio espectro, lo cual resultó costo-efectivo.

Recovery of pathogens with implementation of a weight-based algorithm for pediatric blood cultures: an observational intervention study.

BACKGROUND: Recovering pathogenic bacteria and yeast from pediatric blood cultures and reliably distinguishing between pathogens and contaminants are likely to be improved by increasing the volume of blood submitted to microbiology laboratories for culturing beyond the low volumes that have historically have been used. The primary aim of this study was to assess whether the pathogen recovery rate would increase after implementation of a weight-based algorithm for determining the intended volume of blood submitted for culturing. Secondary aims were to: 1) evaluate the effects of the algorithm implementation on the blood culture contamination rate; 2) determine whether pathogens might be found more often than contaminants in several as opposed to single bottles when more than one bottle is submitted; and 3) describe the microbiological findings for pathogens and contaminants in blood cultures by applying a clinical validation of true blood culture positivity. METHODS: A pre-post comparison of positivity and contamination rates after increasing the theoretical blood volume and number of blood culture bottles was performed, on the basis of a clinical validation of blood culture findings as pathogens vs contaminants. RESULTS: We examined 5327 blood cultures, including 186 with growth (123 true positives and 63 contaminated). The rate of true positive blood cultures significantly increased from 1.6% (42/2553) pre to 2.9% (81/2774, p = .002) post intervention. The rate of contaminated blood cultures did not change significantly during the study period (1.4% [35/2553] pre vs 1.0% [28/2774], p = .222) post intervention), but the proportion of contaminated cultures among all positive cultures decreased from 45% (35/77) pre to 26% (28/109, p = .005) post intervention. A microorganism that grew in a single bottle was considered a contaminant in 35% (8/23) of cases, whereas a microorganism that grew in at least two bottles was considered a contaminant in 2% (1/49, p < .001) of cases. According to common classification criteria relying primarily on the identity of the microorganism, 14% (17/123) of the recovered pathogens would otherwise have been classified as contaminants. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a weight-based algorithm to determine the volume and number of blood cultures in pediatric patients is associated with an increase in the pathogen recovery rate.

Impact of BioFire® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) panels on antibiotic management of bacteremia due to select organisms.

The purpose of this study was to assess changes in time to optimal therapy (TTOT) for bacteremia due to select organisms after implementation of the BioFire® FilmArray® blood culture identification panels at two community teaching hospitals. TTOT (days) was similar in Pre-BCID compared to BCID1 and BCID2 [(2.48 vs. 2.65, p=0.10); (2.48 vs. 2.37, p=0.27)]. There were no significant differences in time to effective antimicrobial therapy between groups. However, there were significantly more therapy changes and appropriate carbapenem use within 24 hours of the Gram stain result for gram-negative organisms in the BCID2 arm compared to the Pre-BCID arm. Additionally, a significant reduction in the duration of vancomycin for gram-positive organisms was noted in the BCID2 arm compared to the Pre-BCID arm. These findings suggest that the incorporation of the BCID2 panel resulted in changes in prescribing practices, leading to more appropriate antimicrobial utilization in a subset of patients.

Early detection of bacteremia pathogens with rapid molecular diagnostic tests and evaluation of effect on intensive care patient management.

INTRODUCTION: The BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification panel (BCID2), a rapid molecular blood culture identification test based on multiplex nested polymerase chain reaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes between the period before (pre-BCID2 group) and after (post-BCID2 group) the introduction of the BCID2 panel into our routine practice. METHODS: The primary endpoint was time to optimal antibiotherapy, and the secondary endpoints were duration of hospital and intensive care unit stay, 7-day, 14-day and 28-day mortality rates after bacteremia. RESULTS: The median time from empirical antibiotherapy to optimal antimicrobial therapy was 4560 (IQR;3060-7140) minutes in the pre-BCID2 group and 1715 (IQR;1362- 2776.25) minutes (in the post-BCID2 group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Adding the BCID2 panel may improve antibiotic management in critically ill bacteremia patients.

Clinical evaluation of the T2Candida assay for the rapid diagnosis of candidemia.

We evaluated the clinical performance of the T2Candida assay. The overall agreement of the T2Candida assay results with the blood culture results was 95.3 % (121/127). The T2Candida assay detected three Candida albicans/tropicalis-positive specimens and one Candida krusei/glabrata-positive specimen; however, it did not detect two Candida glabrata specimens.

Evaluation of Quantamatrix dRASTTM system for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates from positive blood cultures, in comparison with commercial Micronaut broth microdilution system.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) from blood culture (BC) may take several days, limiting the eventual impact on antimicrobial stewardship. Hence, rapid AST systems represent a valuable support in shorting the time-to-response. In this work, the Quantamatrix dRASTTM system (dRAST) was evaluated for rapid AST on 100 monomicrobial BCs (50 Gram-negatives and 50 Gram-positives), including several isolates with clinically relevant resistance mechanisms. AST results were provided in 6-hours, on average. Compared to Micronaut (Merlin) system based on broth microdilution, dRAST exhibited an overall categorical agreement of 92.5 %, essential agreement of 89.0 %, and mean bias of 15.9 %. Category overestimation (potentially leading to unnecessary high-dosage treatment or to exclude active agents) and category underestimation (potentially leading to underdosing or using ineffective agents) were observed in 4.3 % and 3.1 % of cases, respectively. Even though several issues were reported, results confirmed the potential contribution of dRAST to shorten the BCs clinical microbiology workflow and management.

MALDI-TOF direct identification of positive blood cultures: A four-year analytical evaluation of A Triton based workflow.

Rapid and reliable identification of the causal organism in bloodstream infections and sepsis is crucial for both individual patient care and public health. We have implemented a rapid in-house identification protocol (with 10 % Triton) using MALDI-TOF MS for identifying the causative organism in positive blood cultures without prior culture. Our objective was to retrospectively analyze data collected over a four-year period while implementing this rapid in-house identification protocol and to develop a guide for evaluating and reporting the obtained results. Overall, our method utilizing MALDI-TOF MS for rapid in-house identification, demonstrated comparable results to other commercially available and in-house methods reported in the literature. Over the past four years, direct identification has facilitated the distinction between clinically relevant positive blood cultures and irrelevant ones, guiding rapid focus control and appropriate antibiotic treatment. The established guide can serve as a valuable tool in reporting positive blood cultures and associated antibiotic treatments.

Comparison of time-to-detection of Mindray TDR and BacT/ALERT®3D blood culture systems using simulated blood cultures.

PURPOSE: Blood culture (BC) is the standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections. Available blood culture (BC) systems have been developed to shorten the time to detection (TTD) of positive BCs. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Mindray TDR automatic BC system by comparing it with the BacT/ALERT®3D system. METHODS: Sixteen reference strains and 14 clinical isolates were used. Serial dilutions were prepared from all bacterial and yeast colonies with a final concentration of 100 CFU/ml and 10 CFU/ml. The prepared solutions were simultaneously inoculated into the bottles of both systems and placed in blood culture devices. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-two (176 BacT/ALERT®3D and 176 Mindray TDR-X060) blood culture bottles were evaluated, 336 aerobic and 16 anaerobic. At both 10 CFU/ml and 100 CFU/ml dilution, there was no significant difference between the two systems in terms of mean detection times for all isolates (p = 0.965, p = 0.245). When evaluated according to the type of organism, the detection time of gram-positive bacteria at 10 CFU/ml dilution was significantly shorter in the BacT/ALERT system (p = 0.019), whereas detection time for yeasts was significantly shorter with the Mindray system (p = 0.047). The number of anaerobic bacteria was too small to draw statistical conclusions, but we observed a trend of shorter detection times in the Mindray TDR-X060 system. CONCLUSION: Two systems with similar operating principles showed different concentrations-dependent performances in terms of positivity detection times depending on the type of microorganism. Mindray TDR-X060 system has been found to be safe to use at high concentrations with this at lower concentrations further comparative studies are needed on the newly introduced Mindray system.

Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using the MicroScan System: Performance Evaluation of a 4-Hour Bacterial Cultivation From Positive Blood Cultures.

A reliable and above all, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) is required for the diganostics of blood stream infections (BSI). In this study, resistance testing using DxM MicroScan WalkAway (MicroScan) from a 4-h subculture is compared with the standard overnight culture (18-24 h). Randomly selected positive blood cultures (PBC, n = 102) with gram-negative bacteria were included in the study. PBC were sub-cultured onto appropriate agar plates and AST by MicroScan was performed after 4 h of incubation and repeated after incubation for 18-24 h as standard. In a total of 1909 drug-strain pairs, the 4-h subculture approach showed a very high essential agreement (EA) (98.6%) and categorical agreement (CA) (97.1%) compared with the standard. The incidence of minor error (mE), major error (ME), very major error (VME), and adjusted very major error (aVME) was 1.1%, 0.4%, 12.9%, and 5.3%, respectively. In summary, the use of 4-h subcultures for resistance testing with the MicroScan offers a very reliable and easy to realize time saving when testing positive blood cultures with gram-negative bacteria.

Blood culture-free ultra-rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Treatment assessment and patient outcome for sepsis depend predominantly on the timely administration of appropriate antibiotics1-3. However, the clinical protocols used to stratify and select patient-specific optimal therapy are extremely slow4. In particular, the major hurdle in performing rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) remains in the lengthy blood culture procedure, which has long been considered unavoidable due to the limited number of pathogens present in the patient's blood. Here we describe an ultra-rapid AST method that bypasses the need for traditional blood culture, thereby demonstrating potential to reduce the turnaround time of reporting drug susceptibility profiles by more than 40-60 h compared with hospital AST workflows. Introducing a synthetic beta-2-glycoprotein I peptide, a broad range of microbial pathogens are selectively recovered from whole blood, subjected to species identification or instantly proliferated and phenotypically evaluated for various drug conditions using a low-inoculum AST chip. The platform was clinically evaluated by the enrolment of 190 hospitalized patients suspected of having infection, achieving 100% match in species identification. Among the eight positive cases, six clinical isolates were retrospectively tested for AST showing an overall categorical agreement of 94.90% with an average theoretical turnaround time of 13 ± 2.53 h starting from initial blood processing.

Evaluation of Vitek-2 and MicroScan ASTs directly from positive blood culture: A cost-effective 24-h reduction for Enterobacterales and staphylococci.

The reduction of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) time-to-result is a central need, especially in sepsis treatment. The current automated rapid ASTs are still too expensive for many laboratories. We aimed to evaluate three pre-treatment methods for a same-day inoculation on both automated AST platforms available in our laboratory. We tested 100 Enterobacterales or staphylococci positive bottles. We obtained good results with the different methods and instruments. In particular, Vitek-2 showed good performances with Enterobacterales AST when inoculated with bacterial pellet (96.6% categorical agreement - CA-, 93.3% essential agreement - EA). Also short-term incubation colonies for staphylococci AST had acceptable CA (94.2%), even if with 77.5% EA. MicroScan system for staphylococci AST with both short-term incubation and direct blood inoculation reached >95% CA, but 92.5% and 83.6% EA, respectively. On the other hand, Enterobacterales AST showed optimal performances only with bacterial pellet inoculation (97.6% CA). In fact, direct blood inoculation showed not acceptable parameters for several molecules. Both systems allow a 24-h reduction in time-to-result, by using the same instruments of routine activity after rapid and cheap pre-treatments.

Investigation of different methods in rapid microbial identification directly from positive blood culture bottles by MALDI-TOF MS.

Many methods are being tried for rapid and accurate identification of sepsis-causing microorganisms. We analyzed the performance of three different preparation methods [MBT Sepsityper IVD Kit (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Germany), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lysis, and differential centrifugation with protein extraction (Centrifugation +PE)] and compared in standard and Sepsityper modules of the Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for direct identification of bacteria from 240 positive blood culture bottles of BACTEC FX (Becton Dickinson, USA). By using the standard module, correct identification at species level (score ≥2) was done in 46.7% of the samples with SDS lysis, 44.2% with centrifugation +PE, and 25.4% with the Sepsityper kit. These ratios at the genus level (score range 1.70-1.99) were 34.6%, 31.3%, and 32.5%, respectively. With SDS lysis (195), more bacteria were identified correctly than centrifugation +PE (181) and the Sepsityper kit (139). A statistically significant difference was found between SDS and the Sepsityper kit and Centrifugation +PE and the Sepsityper kit (P < 0.001, both). By using the Sepsityper module, correct identification at species level (score ≥1.8) was determined in 74.2% of the samples with SDS lysis and centrifugation +PE each and 55% with the Sepsityper kit. These ratios at the genus level (score range 1.60-1.79) were 16.3%, 10%, and 19.2%, respectively. SDS lysis (217) had significantly higher identification rates than centrifugation +PE (202) and the Sepsityper kit (178) (P = 0.028 and P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was also observed between centrifugation +PE and the Sepsityper kit (P < 0.001). Best performance was obtained with SDS lysis among the methods. Although better performance was achieved by using Sepsityper software module, risk of misidentification should not be ignored. IMPORTANCE: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition, and rapid and accurate identification of the causative microorganisms from blood cultures is crucial for timely and effective treatment. Although there are many studies on direct identification from blood cultures with MALDI-TOF MS, further standardization is still needed. In our study, we analyzed the performance of three different preparation methods and compared by using two analysis modules of the Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS for direct identification of bacteria from numerous positive blood culture bottles. The literature reports a limited number of studies that compare different preparation methods for direct blood culture identification, processing a large number of blood samples concurrently and evaluating the same samples as in our study. Moreover, although SDS is used very frequently in medical laboratories, there are few studies on direct identification from blood culture bottles. In our study, the highest correct identification rate was observed with the SDS method.

Integrated decentralized blood culture incubation: A step towards a 24/7 microbiology service?

To have an impact on the mortality of bloodstream infections, microbiological diagnostics of blood cultures (BC) should provide first results within 12 h. Here, we show how a decentralized BC incubation connected to the central BC incubators via a browser-based application significantly reduces turnaround times.

Utility of Anaerobic Blood Cultures in Neonatal Sepsis Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians variably obtain anaerobic blood cultures as part of sepsis evaluations in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Our objective was to determine if anaerobic blood culture bottles yielded clinically relevant information by either recovering pathogens exclusively or more rapidly than the concurrently obtained aerobic culture bottle in the NICU. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of blood cultures obtained from infants admitted to the NICU from August 01, 2015 to August 31, 2023. Standard practice was to inoculate 2 mL of blood divided equally between an aerobic and an anaerobic culture bottle. We analyzed positive blood cultures where both aerobic and anaerobic bottles were obtained and compared pathogen recovery and time to positivity between the bottles. RESULTS: During the study period, 4599 blood cultures were obtained from 3665 infants, and 265 (5.8%) were positive. Of these, 182 cultures were sent as aerobic-anaerobic pairs and recovered pathogenic organisms. Organisms were recovered exclusively from the anaerobic bottle in 32 (17.6%) cultures. Three organisms were obligate anaerobes; the rest were facultative anaerobes including Coagulase-negative staphylococci (40.6%), Escherichia coli (15.6%), and Staphylococcus aureus (15.6%). Cultures with exclusive recovery in the anaerobic bottle were more frequently obtained ≤3 days after birth, compared to other cultures (31.3% vs 15.3%, P = .03). When both bottles recovered the pathogen (n = 113), the anaerobic bottle had a shorter time to positivity in 76 (67.3%) cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Including anaerobic culture bottles could lead to the identification of pathogens not recovered in the aerobic bottle, as well as earlier identification of pathogens.

Clinical evaluation of droplet digital PCR in the early identification of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department: a prospective observational study.

Background: Rapid and accurate diagnosis of the causative agents is essential for clinical management of bloodstream infections (BSIs) that might induce sepsis/septic shock. A considerable number of suspected sepsis patients initially enter the health-care system through an emergency department (ED), hence it is vital to establish an early strategy to recognize sepsis and initiate prompt care in ED. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical value of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay in suspected sepsis patients in the ED. Methods: This was a prospective single-centered observational study including patients admitted to the ED from 25 October 2022 to 3 June 2023 with suspected BSIs screened by Modified Shapiro Score (MSS) score. The comparison between ddPCR and blood culture (BC) was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ddPCR for BSIs. Meanwhile, correlative analysis between ddPCR and the inflammatory and prognostic-related biomarkers were conducted to explore the relevance. Further, the health economic evaluation of the ddPCR was analyzed. Results: 258 samples from 228 patients, with BC and ddPCR performed simultaneously, were included in this study. We found that ddPCR results were positive in 48.13% (103 of 214) of episodes, with identification of 132 pathogens. In contrast, BC only detected 18 positives, 88.89% of which were identified by ddPCR. When considering culture-proven BSIs, ddPCR shows an overall sensitivity of 88.89% and specificity of 55.61%, the optimal diagnostic power for quantifying BSI through ddPCR is achieved with a copy cutoff of 155.5. We further found that ddPCR exhibited a high accuracy especially in liver abscess patients. Among all the identified virus by ddPCR, EBV has a substantially higher positive rate with a link to immunosuppression. Moreover, the copies of pathogens in ddPCR were positively correlated with various markers of inflammation, coagulation, immunity as well as prognosis. With high sensitivity and specificity, ddPCR facilitates precision antimicrobial stewardship and reduces health care costs. Conclusions: The multiplexed ddPCR delivers precise and quantitative load data on the causal pathogen, offers the ability to monitor the patient's condition and may serve as early warning of sepsis in time-urgent clinical situations as ED. Importance: Early detection and effective administration of antibiotics are essential to improve clinical outcomes for those with life-threatening infection in the emergency department. ddPCR, an emerging tool for rapid and sensitive pathogen identification used as a precise bedside test, has developed to address the current challenges of BSI diagnosis and precise treatment. It characterizes sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and absolute quantifications without a standard curve. ddPCR can detect causative pathogens and related resistance genes in patients with suspected BSIs within a span of three hours. In addition, it can identify polymicrobial BSIs and dynamically monitor changes in pathogenic microorganisms in the blood and can be used to evaluate antibiotic efficacy and survival prognosis. Moreover, the copies of pathogens in ddPCR were positively correlated with various markers of inflammation, coagulation, immunity. With high sensitivity and specificity, ddPCR facilitates precision antimicrobial stewardship and reduces health care costs.

The real-world impact of the BioFire FilmArray blood culture identification 2 panel on antimicrobial stewardship among patients with bloodstream infections in intensive care units with a high burden of drug-resistant pathogens.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of drug-resistant pathogens leads to delays in adequate antimicrobial treatment in intensive care units (ICU). The real-world influence of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel on pathogen identification, diagnostic concordance with conventional culture methods, and antimicrobial stewardship in the ICU remains unexplored. METHODS: This retrospective observational study, conducted from July 2021 to August 2023, involved adult ICU patients with positive blood cultures who underwent BCID2 testing. The concordance between BCID2 and conventional culture results was examined, and its impact on antimicrobial stewardship was assessed through a comprehensive retrospective review of patient records by intensivists. RESULTS: A total of 129 blood specimens from 113 patients were analysed. Among these patients, a high proportion of drug-resistant strains were noted, including carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) (57.1%), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (100%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (70%), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) (100%). The time from blood culture collection to obtaining BCID2 results was significantly shorter than conventional culture (46.2 h vs. 86.9 h, p < 0.001). BCID2 demonstrated 100% concordance in genotype-phenotype correlation in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) for CRKP, carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli, MRSA, and VRE. A total of 40.5% of patients received inadequate empirical antimicrobial treatment. The antimicrobial regimen was adjusted or confirmed in 55.4% of patients following the BCID2 results. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of a high burden of drug-resistant pathogens, BCID2 demonstrated rapid pathogen and AMR detection, with a noticeable impact on antimicrobial stewardship in BSI in the ICU.

Short-term culture for rapid identification by mass spectrometry and automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing from positive bottles.

BACKGROUND: Early and appropriate antibiotic treatment improves the clinical outcome of patients with sepsis. There is an urgent need for rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria that cause bloodstream infection (BSI). Rapid ID and AST can be achieved by short-term incubation on solid medium of positive blood cultures using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) and the BD M50 system. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of rapid method compared to traditional method. METHODS: A total of 124 mono-microbial samples were collected. Positive blood culture samples were short-term incubated on blood agar plates and chocolate agar plates for 5 ∼ 7 h, and the rapid ID and AST were achieved through Zybio EXS2000 MS and BD M50 System, respectively. RESULTS: Compared with the traditional 24 h culture for ID, this rapid method can shorten the cultivation time to 5 ∼ 7 h. Accurate organism ID was achieved in 90.6% of Gram-positive bacteria (GP), 98.5% of Gram-negative bacteria (GN), and 100% of fungi. The AST resulted in the 98.5% essential agreement (EA) and 97.1% category agreements (CA) in NMIC-413, 99.4% EA and 98.9% CA in PMIC-92, 100% both EA and CA in SMIC-2. Besides, this method can be used for 67.2% (264/393) of culture bottles during routine work. The mean turn-around time (TAT) for obtaining final results by conventional method is approximately 72.6 ± 10.5 h, which is nearly 24 h longer than the rapid method. CONCLUSIONS: The newly described method is expected to provide faster and reliable ID and AST results, making it an important tool for rapid management of blood cultures (BCs). In addition, this rapid method can be used to process most positive blood cultures, enabling patients to receive rapid and effective treatment.

Enhancing pneumococcal bacteraemia diagnosis: A comparative assessment of culture-independent assays (MALDI-TOF-MS Sepsityper® module and a lateral flow inmunochromatography test).

INTRODUCTION: Pneumococcal bacteraemia is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality. Traditional culture-based methods lack sensitivity and are time-consuming. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two culture-independent assays, the MALDI-TOF-MS Sepsityper® module and the lateral flow inmunochromatography test (LFICT) with the Standard F® Streptococcus pneumoniae, directly from positive blood culture (BC) bottles. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from December 2021 to July 2022. For all BC positives for S. pneumoniae a double centrifugation protocol was implemented. The resulting pellet was subsequently processed using both techniques. RESULTS: The LFICT showed exceptional performance with 100% sensitivity and specificity, outperforming the MALDI-TOF-MS Sepsityper® module, which achieved 85.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Nevertheless, the combination of these assays offers a robust and comprehensive approach to diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous use of both techniques offers a promising alternative that can be integrated into routine practices directly from BC samples.