Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.894
Filter
1.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 246, 2024 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38987782

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study quantifies the longitudinal economic burden for a wide spectrum of incident complications, metabolic syndrome (MS)-related risk factors, and comorbidities in patients with MS. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized linked data from the 2013 National Health Interview Survey and the 2012-2021 National Health Insurance Research Database to identify MS individuals and their characteristics. The incidence rate of each complication was calculated as the number of complication events in the study period divided by the total person-years during follow-up. The healthcare costs of complications were analyzed using a generalized estimating equation model to determine the cost impact of complications after adjustment for patients' characteristics. Sensitivity analyses on variables with high missing rates (i.e., cause of death, body mass index) were performed. RESULTS: Among 837 identified MS individuals over 8.28 (± 1.35) years of follow-up, the most frequent complications were microvascular diseases (incidence rate for nephropathy/retinopathy/neuropathy: 6.49/2.64/2.08 events per 100 person-years), followed by cardiovascular diseases (2.47), peripheral vascular diseases (2.01), and cancers (1.53). Death was the costliest event (event-year cost per person: USD 16,429) and cancers were the most expensive complications (USD 9,127-11,083 for non-MS- and MS-related cancers). Developing non-MS/MS-related cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity-related medical conditions increased annual costs by 273% (95% CI: 181-397%)/175% (105-269%), 159% (118-207%), and 140% (84-214%), respectively. Microvascular diseases had the lowest cost impact on annual costs (i.e., 27% [17-39%]/27% [11-46%]/24% [11-37%] increases for nephropathy/neuropathy/retinopathy, respectively). Having existing comorbidities increased annual costs by 20% (osteoarthritis) to 108% (depression). Having morbid obesity (i.e., body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2) increased annual costs by 58% (30-91%). CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden from costly incident complications (i.e., cardiovascular diseases, peripheral vascular diseases, cancers), MS-related risk factors (i.e., morbid obesity), and comorbidities (i.e., depression) highlight the urgent need for early intervention to prevent MS and its progression. The comprehensive cost estimates reported in this study can facilitate the parameterization of economic analyses to identify cost-effective interventions for these patients.


Subject(s)
Comorbidity , Cost of Illness , Databases, Factual , Health Care Costs , Metabolic Syndrome , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/economics , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Metabolic Syndrome/mortality , Incidence , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Time Factors , Longitudinal Studies , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Cardiometabolic Risk Factors , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis
2.
Glob Heart ; 19(1): 56, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973984

ABSTRACT

Background: The recent inclusion of polypills-fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive medicines and a statin with or without aspirin-in the World Health Organization's Essential Medicines List (EML) reiterates the potential of this approach to improve global treatment coverage for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Although there exists extensive evidence on the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of polypills, there has been no research to date assessing the real-world availability and affordability of polypills globally. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey, based on the WHO/Health Action International methodology, in 13 countries around the world. In the surveyed countries, we first ascertained whether any polypill was authorised for marketing and/or included in EMLs and clinical guidelines. In each country, we collected retail and price data for polypills from at least one public-sector facility and three private pharmacies using convenience sampling. Polypills were considered unaffordable if the lowest-paid worker spent more than a day's wage to purchase a monthly supply. Results: Polypills were approved for marketing in four of the 13 surveyed countries: Spain, India, Mauritius and Argentina. None of these countries included polypills in national guidelines, formularies, or EMLs. In the four countries, no surveyed public pharmacies stocked polypills. In the private sector, we identified seven unique polypill combinations, marketed by eight different companies. Private sector availability was 100% in Argentina and Spain. Most combinations (n = 5) identified were in India. Combinations found in India and Spain were affordable in the local context. A lowest-paid government worker would spend between 0.2 (India) and 2.8 (Mauritius) days' wages to pay the price for one month's supply of the polypills. Polypills were likely to be affordable if they were manufactured in the same country. Conclusion: Low availability and affordability of polypills in the public sector suggest that implementation remains poor globally. Context-specific multi-disciplinary health system research is required to understand factors affecting polypill implementation and to design and evaluate appropriate implementation strategies.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Drug Combinations , India/epidemiology , Antihypertensive Agents/economics , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Spain/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Aspirin/economics , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/economics , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Global Health , Argentina/epidemiology
4.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 919-930, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38953706

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study aimed to assess and compare the health care resource utilization (HCRU) and medical cost of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) by disease severity based on Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) score among US adults in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational cohort study used claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD) to compare all-cause, cardiovascular (CV)-related, and liver-related HCRU, including hospitalization, and medical costs stratified by FIB-4 score among patients with MASH (identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM] code K75.81). Hospitalization and medical costs were compared by FIB-4 score using generalized linear regression with negative binomial and gamma distribution models, respectively, while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: The cohort included a total of 5,104 patients with MASH and comprised 3,162, 1,343, and 599 patients with low, indeterminate, and high FIB-4 scores, respectively. All-cause hospitalization was significantly higher in the high FIB-4 cohort when compared with the low FIB-4 reference after covariate adjustment (rate ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.32-2.02; p < .0001). CV-related hospitalization was similar across all cohorts; however, CV-related costs were 1.26 times higher (95% CI, 1.11-1.45; p < .001) in the indeterminate cohort and 2.15 times higher (95% CI, 1.77-2.62; p < .0001) in the high FIB-4 cohort when compared with the low FIB-4 cohort. Patients with indeterminate and high FIB-4 scores had 2.97 (95% CI, 1.78-4.95) and 12.08 (95% CI, 7.35-19.88) times the rate of liver-related hospitalization and were 3.68 (95% CI, 3.11-4.34) and 33.73 (95% CI, 27.39-41.55) times more likely to incur liver-related costs, respectively (p < .0001 for all). LIMITATIONS: This claims-based analysis relied on diagnostic coding accuracy, which may not capture the presence of all diseases or all care received. CONCLUSIONS: High and indeterminate FIB-4 scores were associated with significantly higher liver-related clinical and economic burdens than low FIB-4 scores among patients with MASH.


MASH is a serious liver disease that can lead to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and other complications. There is a need to understand the impact of disease severity on the burden of MASH. Health care claims data were used to assess the use of medical resources, including hospitalization, and medical costs among patients with 3 different levels of severity of MASH, as assessed via FIB-4 score. FIB-4 is a widely available non-invasive marker of severity. Rates of all-cause, cardiovascular-related and liver-related hospitalization and medical costs were several-fold higher in patients with high disease severity of MASH than those with low disease severity of MASH.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Insurance Claim Review , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , United States , Fatty Liver/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economics , Retrospective Studies , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Comorbidity , Metabolic Diseases
5.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0307468, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028718

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Risk stratification scores such as the European Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) are used to guide individuals on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Adding high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) to such risk scores has the potential to improve accuracy of CVD prediction. We investigated how applying hsTnI in addition to SCORE may impact management, outcome, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Characteristics of 72,190 apparently healthy individuals from the Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe (BiomarCaRE) project were included into a discrete-event simulation comparing two strategies for assessing CVD risk. The standard strategy reflecting current practice employed SCORE (SCORE); the alternative strategy involved adding hsTnI information for further stratifying SCORE risk categories (S-SCORE). Individuals were followed over ten years from baseline examination to CVD event, death or end of follow-up. The model tracked the occurrence of events and calculated direct costs of screening, prevention, and treatment from a European health system perspective. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in € per quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) gained during 10 years of follow-up. Outputs were validated against observed rates, and results were tested in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: S-SCORE yielded a change in management for 10.0% of individuals, and a reduction in CVD events (4.85% vs. 5.38%, p<0.001) and mortality (6.80% vs. 7.04%, p<0.001). S-SCORE led to 23 (95%CI: 20-26) additional event-free years and 7 (95%CI: 5-9) additional QALYs per 1,000 subjects screened, and resulted in a relative risk reduction for CVD of 9.9% (95%CI: 7.3-13.5%) with a number needed to screen to prevent one event of 183 (95%CI: 172 to 203). S-SCORE increased costs per subject by 187€ (95%CI: 177 € to 196 €), leading to an ICER of 27,440€/QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis was performed with eligibility for treatment being the most sensitive. CONCLUSION: Adding a person's hsTnI value to SCORE can impact clinical decision making and eventually improves QALYs and is cost-effective compared to CVD prevention strategies using SCORE alone. Stratifying SCORE risk classes for hsTnI would likely offer cost-effective alternatives, particularly when targeting higher risk groups.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Troponin I , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Troponin I/blood , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment/methods , Biomarkers/blood , Aged , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Europe/epidemiology , Adult , Heart Disease Risk Factors
6.
Sante Publique ; 36(3): 127-136, 2024.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906807

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The management of cardiovascular pathologies has a high cost for users. PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: It is therefore important to assess the costs of hospitalization to gain a better understanding of its impact on care. RESULTS: This was a case series-type, descriptive, observational study with prospective data collection. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included, with a mean age of 51 years and extremes ranging from 14 to 86 years. The average length of stay was 7.1 days. Heart failure was the most frequent pathology (61.7%). The average monthly income per patient was 101,360 CFA francs. The average total direct cost during hospitalization was 114,015 CFAF. The average direct cost of drugs and consumables was 60,553.77 CFAF. The average direct cost of paraclinical examinations was 34,360.29 CFAF. Hospitalization costs averaged 16,747.47 CFAF. Total direct costs during hospitalization were 11,737,060 CFAF, dominated by drugs and medical consumables (53.14%), followed by complementary examinations (29.86%) and non-medical expenses (17%). During the study, 13.59% of patients were discharged against medical advice. Expenses were covered by the parents in 71.84% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The average direct cost of hospitalization is well above the purchasing power of the majority of patients.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hospitalization , Humans , Middle Aged , Burkina Faso , Adult , Aged , Female , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Adolescent , Young Adult , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Prospective Studies , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data
7.
Clin Cardiol ; 47(6): e24302, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is no widely accepted care model for managing high-need, high-cost (HNHC) patients. We hypothesized that a Home Heart Hospital (H3), which provides longitudinal, hospital-level at-home care, would improve care quality and reduce costs for HNHC patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between enrollment in H3, which provides longitudinal, hospital-level at-home care, care quality, and costs for HNHC patients with CVD. METHODS: This retrospective within-subject cohort study used insurance claims and electronic health records data to evaluate unadjusted and adjusted annualized hospitalization rates, total costs of care, part A costs, and mortality rates before, during, and following H3. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were enrolled in H3 between February 2019 and October 2021. Patients' mean age was 75 years and 50% were female. Common comorbidities included congestive heart failure (50%), atrial fibrillation (37%), coronary artery disease (44%). Relative to pre-enrollment, enrollment in H3 was associated with significant reductions in annualized hospitalization rates (absolute reduction (AR): 2.4 hospitalizations/year, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.8, -4.0; p < 0.001; total costs of care (AR: -$56 990, 95% CI: -$105 170, -$8810; p < 0.05; and part A costs (AR: -$78 210, 95% CI: -$114 770, -$41 640; p < 0.001). Annualized post-H3 total costs and part A costs were significantly lower than pre-enrollment costs (total costs of care: -$113 510, 95% CI: -$151 340, -$65 320; p < 0.001; part A costs: -$84 480, 95% CI: -$121 040, -$47 920; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal home-based care models hold promise for improving quality and reducing healthcare spending for HNHC patients with CVD.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hospitalization , Humans , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Hospitalization/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based/economics , Hospital Costs , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged
8.
JAMA Health Forum ; 5(6): e241478, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874961

ABSTRACT

This cross-sectional study examines the growth in numbers and geographic locations of private equity acquisitions in cardiology across the US.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Private Sector , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Private Sector/economics , Private Sector/trends , United States
9.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(8): 102677, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795804

ABSTRACT

This article emphasizes the pivotal role of economic evaluation in the management of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) within the Indian healthcare system. It explores the importance of economic evaluation methodologies such as cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, and cost-benefit analysis in guiding informed healthcare decisions related to CVD management. Additionally, it discusses the unique challenges and opportunities surrounding health technology assessment (HTA) and economic evaluation specific to India, providing insights into potential areas for improvement. By giving precedence to economic evaluation, India can optimize the allocation of resources, improve patient outcomes, and alleviate the economic burden associated with CVDs. The implementation of these recommendations has the potential to significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of CVD management strategies in India, ultimately leading to improved healthcare outcomes for the population.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Humans , India , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/economics , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , Equipment and Supplies/economics , Health Care Costs
13.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(6 Spec No.): SP430-SP436, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38820183

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study simulated the potential multiyear health and economic benefits of participation in 4 cardiometabolic virtual-first care (V1C) programs: prevention, hypertension, diabetes, and diabetes plus hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: Using nationally available data and existing clinical and demographic information from members participating in cardiometabolic V1C programs, a microsimulation approach was used to estimate potential reduction in onset of disease sequelae and associated gross savings (ie, excluding the cost of V1C programs) in health care costs. METHODS: Members of each program were propensity matched to similar records in the combined 2012-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey files based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and diagnosis status of diabetes and/or hypertension. V1C program-attributed changes in clinical outcomes combined with baseline biometric levels and other risk factors were used as inputs to model disease onset and related gross health care costs. RESULTS: Across the V1C programs, sustained improvements in weight loss, hemoglobin A1c, and blood pressure levels were estimated to reduce incidence of modeled disease sequelae by 2% to 10% over the 5 years following enrollment. As a result of sustained improvement in biometrics and reduced disease onset, the estimated gross savings in medical expenditures across the programs would be $892 to $1342 after 1 year, and cumulative estimated gross medical savings would be $2963 to $4346 after 3 years and $5221 to $7756 after 5 years. In addition, high program engagement was associated with greater health and economic benefits. CONCLUSIONS: V1C programs for prevention and management of cardiometabolic chronic conditions have potential long-term health and financial implications.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Adult , United States , Models, Economic , Nutrition Surveys , Diabetes Mellitus/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics
14.
Indian J Pharmacol ; 56(2): 97-104, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687313

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: India has taken several initiatives to provide health care to its population while keeping the related expenditure minimum. Since cardiovascular diseases are the most prevalent chronic conditions, in the present study, we aimed to analyze the difference in prices of medicines prescribed for three cardiovascular risk factors, based on (a) listed and not listed in the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM) and (b) generic and branded drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outpatient prescriptions for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were retrospectively analyzed from 12 tertiary centers. The prices of medicines prescribed were compared based on presence or absence in NLEM India-2015 and prescribing by generic versus brand name. The price was standardized and presented as average price per medicine per year for a given medicine. The results are presented in Indian rupee (INR) and as median (range). RESULTS: Of the 4,736 prescriptions collected, 843 contained oral antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and/or hypolipidemic medicines. The price per medicine per year for NLEM oral antidiabetics was INR 2849 (2593-3104) and for non-NLEM was INR 5343 (2964-14364). It was INR 806 (243-2132) for generic and INR 3809 (1968-14364) for branded antidiabetics. Antihypertensives and hypolipidemics followed the trend. The price of branded non-NLEM medicines was 5-22 times higher compared to generic NLEM which, for a population of 1.37 billion, would translate to a potential saving of 346.8 billion INR for statins. The variability was significant for sulfonylureas, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, diuretics, and statins (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The study highlights an urgent need for intervention to actualize the maximum benefit of government policies and minimize the out-of-pocket expenditure on medicines.


Subject(s)
Hypoglycemic Agents , India , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Hypoglycemic Agents/economics , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Drugs, Generic/economics , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , Hypolipidemic Agents/economics , Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Drug Costs , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/economics , Antihypertensive Agents/economics , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Costs and Cost Analysis
15.
Atherosclerosis ; 393: 117541, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677159

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Familial hypercholesterolemia is an underdiagnosed genetic metabolic condition limiting the clearance of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increasing lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease. Population genetic screening in unselected individuals could quickly identify cases of familial hypercholesterolemia and enable early prevention, but the economic impact of widespread screening on patients has not been studied. METHODS: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of population genetic screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in 20 and 35-year-old adults in the United States from the perspective of patients. We developed a decision tree Markov hybrid model to examine diagnoses, cardiovascular disease, cardiac events, quality of life, and costs under population genetic screening compared to family-based cascade testing. RESULTS: While population genetic screening increased diagnoses and reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease, population genetic screening was not cost-effective compared to cascade testing at current levels of willingness to pay. Lower genetic testing costs, combined screening with other genetic conditions, and support to maintain lipid-lowering therapy use over time could improve the cost-effectiveness of population genetic screening. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is needed to examine how cost-sharing strategies may affect the cost-effectiveness of screening to patients and how families and providers experience the clinical and economic outcomes of population screening.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Genetic Testing , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II , Markov Chains , Humans , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/genetics , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/diagnosis , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/economics , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/blood , Genetic Testing/economics , Adult , United States/epidemiology , Male , Female , Young Adult , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Models, Economic , Decision Trees , Health Care Costs , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Quality of Life , Predictive Value of Tests , Cardiovascular Diseases/genetics , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Risk Factors , Biomarkers/blood
16.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 33(5): 565-572, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573239

ABSTRACT

Background: The United States has high and increasing rates of maternal morbidity and mortality, large proportions of which are related to cardiovascular health (CVH). Methods: We searched for National Institutes of Health (NIH) supported research as well as that of two other Agencies in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for fiscal years (FY) 2016-2021. Grants included maternal health conditions or exposures across all pregnancy stages, but excluded grants that focused entirely on birth, neonatal, infant/childhood outcomes. Results were manually curated by reviewing the abstract and specific aims. Grants deemed to be relevant were grouped by category. Results: Between FY 2016-2021, overall Maternal Health grants remained unchanged at an average of 1.4% of total DHHS grant funding. Maternal CVH-specific (MCVH) funding amounted to $278,926,105 for 755 grants, $191,344,649 was for 534 Type-1 grants, representing a twofold increase. Non-NIH DHHS agencies most commonly funded general Maternal Health related to CVH; NIH focused funding classified as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, maternal morbidity and mortality, obesity, and diabetes. Non-NIH DHSS Agencies most commonly funded clinical applied research. In addition to clinical applied grants, NIH funded substantial proportions of grants classified as basic research, clinical trials, and/or translational. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) MCVH grants studied participants in the pre-partum period (78.5%), followed by the post-partum period (50.5%), with relatively few in pre-pregnancy and peri-partum periods (10.8% and 9.7%, respectively); at the NIH level, the peri-partum period had better representation at 20.3%, whereas the pre-pregnancy period remained low at 9.9%. Conclusions: Federal grant funding for maternal health including MCVH increased at the same rate as its funding for overall research, and represented only 1.4% of overall total funding. The pre-pregnancy period was understudied in overall NIH funding and represents a gap area whereby funding agencies could further foster research advances.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Financing, Government , Maternal Health , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Humans , United States , Female , Maternal Health/economics , Pregnancy , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services , Research Support as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Biomedical Research/economics
18.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3429-3436, 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631948

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We assess the cost-effectiveness of switching from standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccination (SD-QIV) to high-dose vaccination (HD-QIV) for Dutch adults aged 60 years and older. METHODS: A health-economic model was used to compare the scenario where HD-QIV was implemented compared to the current standard, SD-QIV. This model used a lifetime horizon and assessed the cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective. A recently published meta-analysis was used to incorporate the benefits of HD-QIV, including cardiorespiratory hospitalizations, in analyses considering RCT only or combining RCT and RWE estimates in a scenario analysis. RESULTS: Implementing HD-QIV is cost effective at its list price, with an ICER of €5,400 per QALY gained. The main driver of these results is the prevention of cardiorespiratory hospitalizations. Other public health benefits are the prevention of GP consults and deaths. HD-QIV is highly likely to be cost-effective, reaching a 100% probability of being cost effective at the Dutch willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing HD-QIV for adults aged 60 and over within the existing influenza vaccination campaign is highly cost effective. HD-QIV may support alleviating potential capacity issues in Dutch hospitals in the winter respiratory season.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospitalization , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Vaccination , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/economics , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Netherlands , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Aged , Middle Aged , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/methods , Male , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Models, Economic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
20.
Nat Hum Behav ; 8(5): 903-916, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480824

ABSTRACT

Evidence on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor prevalence among adults living below the World Bank's international line for extreme poverty (those with income <$1.90 per day) globally is sparse. Here we pooled individual-level data from 105 nationally representative household surveys across 78 countries, representing 85% of people living in extreme poverty globally, and sorted individuals by country-specific measures of household income or wealth to identify those in extreme poverty. CVD risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, smoking, obesity and dyslipidaemia) were present among 17.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 16.7-18.3%), 4.0% (95% CI 3.6-4.5%), 10.6% (95% CI 9.0-12.3%), 3.1% (95% CI 2.8-3.3%) and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9-1.9%) of adults in extreme poverty, respectively. Most were not treated for CVD-related conditions (for example, among those with hypertension earning <$1.90 per day, 15.2% (95% CI 13.3-17.1%) reported taking blood pressure-lowering medication). The main limitation of the study is likely measurement error of poverty level and CVD risk factors that could have led to an overestimation of CVD risk factor prevalence among adults in extreme poverty. Nonetheless, our results could inform equity discussions for resource allocation and design of effective interventions.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Poverty , Humans , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Adult , Prevalence , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Risk Factors , Hypertension/epidemiology , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/epidemiology , Aged , Smoking/epidemiology , Young Adult , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL