ABSTRACT
Antibiotic combination therapy is a promising approach to address the urgent need for novel treatment options for infections caused by carbapenem-polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPR-Kp). The present study aimed to investigate the synergistic potential of four cephalosporins in combination with polymyxin B (PMB). A checkerboard assay was performed to evaluate the synergistic effects of cephalexin (CLX), cefixime, cefotaxime (CTX), and cefmenoxime (CMX) in combination with PMB. Subsequently, experiments evaluating the use of CTX or CMX in combination with PMB (CTX-PMB or CMX-PMB, respectively), including growth curve and SynergyFinder analysis, antibiofilm activity assays, cell membrane integrity assays, and scanning electron microscopy, were performed. Safety assessments were also conducted, including hemolysis and toxicity evaluations, using Caenorhabditis elegans. Furthermore, an in vivo model in C. elegans was adopted to assess the treatment efficacy against CPR-Kp infections. CTX-PMB and CMX-PMB exhibited low fractional inhibitory concentration indexes ranging from 0.19 to 0.50 and from 0.25 to 1.5, respectively, and zero interaction potency scores of 37.484 and 15.076, respectively. The two combinations significantly reduced growth and biofilm formation in CPR-Kp. Neither CTX-PMB nor CMX-PMB compromised bacterial cell integrity. Safety assessments revealed a low hemolysis percentage and high survival rates in the C. elegans toxicity evaluations. The in vivo model revealed that the CTX-PMB and CMX-PMB treatments improved the survival rates of C. elegans. The synergistic effects of the CTX-PMB and CMX-PMB combinations, both in vitro and in vivo, indicate that these antibiotic pairings could represent effective therapeutic options for infections caused by CPR-Kp.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Biofilms , Caenorhabditis elegans , Cephalosporins , Drug Synergism , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymyxin B , Polymyxin B/pharmacology , Polymyxin B/therapeutic use , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Animals , Caenorhabditis elegans/drug effects , Biofilms/drug effects , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Drug Therapy, CombinationABSTRACT
The study was carried out in dairy cows to elucidate whether treatment of clinical mastitis quarters with Spectramast® LC (ceftiofur hydrochloride, 125 mg, Zoetis) created a reason for discarding milk from adjacent untreated healthy quarters. The antibiotic was infused once daily in the affected mammary quarter for four days. Forty-nine cows were evaluated after diagnosis of clinical mastitis in three or fewer udder quarters. In all cases, quarters that did not receive treatment had milk samples collected one day after the end of treatment. All milk samples from untreated quarters were below the maximum permissible limit for the presence of antibiotic residues after analysis with the BetaStar S Combo test. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics may explain this finding. We conclude that it is feasible to use milk from untreated quarters of animals that have been treated with Spectramast® LC. We also reiterate the need to carry out tests with other pharmacological bases, and that the results found in this experiment cannot be extrapolated to other drugs.Dairy cattle have considerable importance in the development of the Brazilian economy, being directly linked to economic and social progress. In the first half of 2020, 12.1 billion liters of milk were produced in Brazil and in 2019, there was a new record of 25.01 billion liters produced (IBGE, 2020). This production comes from a wide variety of production systems, coming from smallholder farmers as well as from large companies that use the latest technologies available on the market. Dairy production is a complex activity. For one to obtain economical success, several aspects must be monitored. Maintaining the health of animals is a top priority, and the literature suggests that various diseases are a common challenge for dairy producers. Mastitis is the main disease that affects dairy cows, responsible for considerable economic loss and significant zootechnical and productive challenges (Ruegg, ). It is considered the second leading cause of cow culling in dairy herds, behind reproductive problems. Mastitis is characterized by infection of the mammary gland and may or may not occur with inflammation, generating changes in the mammary tissue and properties of the milk. It is classifield into clinical or subclinical mastitis, according to presence or absence of clinical signs, and into contagious or environmental based on the causative agent (Correa et al., ).
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cephalosporins , Drug Residues , Mastitis, Bovine , Milk , Mastitis, Bovine/drug therapy , Animals , Cattle , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Milk/chemistry , Drug Residues/analysis , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/analysis , Cephalosporins/pharmacokinetics , Mammary Glands, Animal/drug effects , BrazilABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-related infections are important contributors to maternal sepsis and mortality. We aimed to describe clinical, microbiological characteristics and use of antibiotics by source of infection and country income, among hospitalized women with suspected or confirmed pregnancy-related infections. METHODS: We used data from WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) on maternal infections in hospitalized women, in 52 low-middle- and high-income countries conducted between November 28th and December 4th, 2017, to describe the frequencies and medians of maternal demographic, obstetric, and clinical characteristics and outcomes, methods of infection diagnosis and causative pathogens, of single source pregnancy-related infection, other than breast, and initial use of therapeutic antibiotics. We included 1456 women. RESULTS: We found infections of the genital (n = 745/1456, 51.2%) and the urinary tracts (UTI) (n = 531/1456, 36.5%) to be the most frequent. UTI (n = 339/531, 63.8%) and post-caesarean skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) (n = 99/180, 55.0%) were the sources with more culture samples taken and microbiological confirmations. Escherichia coli was the major uropathogen (n = 103/118, 87.3%) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 21/44, 47.7%) was the commonest pathogen in SSTI. For 13.1% (n = 191) of women, antibiotics were not prescribed on the same day of infection suspicion. Cephalosporins (n = 283/531, 53.3%) were the commonest antibiotic class prescribed for UTI, while metronidazole (n = 303/925, 32.8%) was the most prescribed for all other sources. Ceftriaxone with metronidazole was the commonest combination for the genital tract (n = 98/745, 13.2%) and SSTI (n = 22/180, 12.2%). Metronidazole (n = 137/235, 58.3%) was the most prescribed antibiotic in low-income countries while cephalosporins and co-amoxiclav (n = 129/186, 69.4%) were more commonly prescribed in high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in antibiotics used across countries could be due to availability, local guidelines, prescribing culture, cost, and access to microbiology laboratory, despite having found similar sources and pathogens as previous studies. Better dissemination of recommendations in line with antimicrobial stewardship programmes might improve antibiotic prescription.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Urinary Tract Infections , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , World Health Organization , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
In intensive care units (ICUs), infection rates range from 18 to 54%, which is five to ten times higher than those observed in other hospital units, with a mortality rate of 9% to 60%. In recent decades, the susceptibility pattern has changed and Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) have become a threat due to their high frequency of multidrug resistance associated with a scarcity of therapeutic options. However, the drugs Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) and Ceftazidime/Avibactam (C/A) are demonstrating good clinical and microbiological response in the treatment of severe nosocomial infections. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with severe infections caused by Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) GNB treated with C/T and C/A. Our study evaluates a total of 131 patients who received treatment with C/T and C/A due to infections caused by MDR GNB within the period from 2018 to 2021. The main infections were urinary tract (46,6%) and respiratory (26,7%) infections. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the prevailing agent in the sample evaluation (34.3%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (30,1%). About 54,9% of patients showed a favorable response, with culture negativation in 66,4% of the samples, with no discrepancy in negativations when comparing ages: 67,7% in young and 66% in elderly patients. Among the patients, 62,6% received monotherapy with C/T and C/A with a better response observed with monotherapy compared to combination therapy (58,6% vs 41,4%). The overall mortality rate was 45%, with MDR GNB infections responsible for 33,9% of these deaths, and the others (66,1%) due to factors such as oncological, hematological, and degenerative neurological diseases. In regards to hematological aspect, 35,1% of patients showed changes, with 28,2% of them presenting anemia, 4,5% thrombocytopenia, and 2,5% thrombocytosis. Concerning the use of invasive devices, higher mortality was observed in patients on mechanical ventilation (52%). In this manner, it was possible to observe that therapy with C/T and C/A yielded a favorable clinical outcome in patients with severe infections caused by MDR GNB in the study. These drugs also demonstrated good tolerability regardless of age or the presence of preexisting comorbidities and were deemed safe when assessing adverse effects. Our data also demonstrate the importance of determining the mechanism of resistance to carbapenems so that these drugs can be used more effectively and rationally.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Azabicyclo Compounds , Ceftazidime , Humans , Aged , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Ceftazidime/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Tazobactam/therapeutic use , Tazobactam/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Intensive Care Units , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pseudomonas aeruginosaABSTRACT
AIMS: The combination of daptomycin and ceftaroline used as salvage therapy is associated with higher survival and decreased clinical failure in complicated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections that are resistant to standard MRSA treatment. This study aimed to evaluate dosing regimens for coadministration of daptomycin and ceftaroline in special populations including paediatrics, renally impaired (RI), obese and geriatrics that generate sufficient coverage against daptomycin-resistant MRSA. METHODS: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models were developed from pharmacokinetic studies of healthy adults, geriatric, paediatric, obese and RI patients. The predicted profiles were used to evaluate joint probability of target attainment (PTA), as well as tissue-to-plasma ratios. RESULTS: The adult dosing regimens of 6 mg/kg every (q)24h or q48h daptomycin and 300-600 mg q12h ceftaroline fosamil by RI categories achieved ≥90% joint PTA when the minimum inhibitory concentrations in the combination are at or below 1 and 4 µg/mL against MRSA. In paediatrics, wherein there is no recommended daptomycin dosing regimen for S. aureus bacteraemia, ≥90% joint PTA is achieved when the minimum inhibitory concentrations in the combination are up to 0.5 and 2 µg/mL for standard paediatric dosing regimens of 7 mg/kg q24h daptomycin and 12 mg/kg q8h ceftaroline fosamil. Model predicted tissue-to-plasma ratios of 0.3 and 0.7 in the skin and lung, respectively, for ceftaroline and 0.8 in the skin for daptomycin. CONCLUSION: Our work illustrates how physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling can inform appropriate dosing of adult and paediatric patients and thereby enable prediction of target attainment in the patients during multitherapies.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Daptomycin , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Adult , Humans , Child , Aged , Daptomycin/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Cephalosporins/pharmacokinetics , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , CeftarolineABSTRACT
Traditional studies on the evolution of antibiotic resistance development use approaches that can range from laboratory-based experimental studies, to epidemiological surveillance, to sequencing of clinical isolates. However, evolutionary trajectories also depend on the environment in which selection takes place, compelling the need to more deeply investigate the impact of environmental complexities and their dynamics over time. Herein, we explored the within-patient adaptive long-term evolution of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa hypermutator lineage in the airways of a cystic fibrosis (CF) patient by performing a chronological tracking of mutations that occurred in different subpopulations; our results demonstrated parallel evolution events in the chromosomally encoded class C ß-lactamase (blaPDC). These multiple mutations within blaPDC shaped diverse coexisting alleles, whose frequency dynamics responded to the changing antibiotic selective pressures for more than 26 years of chronic infection. Importantly, the combination of the cumulative mutations in blaPDC provided structural and functional protein changes that resulted in a continuous enhancement of its catalytic efficiency and high level of cephalosporin resistance. This evolution was linked to the persistent treatment with ceftazidime, which we demonstrated selected for variants with robust catalytic activity against this expanded-spectrum cephalosporin. A "gain of function" of collateral resistance toward ceftolozane, a more recently introduced cephalosporin that was not prescribed to this patient, was also observed, and the biochemical basis of this cross-resistance phenomenon was elucidated. This work unveils the evolutionary trajectories paved by bacteria toward a multidrug-resistant phenotype, driven by decades of antibiotic treatment in the natural CF environmental setting. IMPORTANCE Antibiotics are becoming increasingly ineffective to treat bacterial infections. It has been consequently predicted that infectious diseases will become the biggest challenge to human health in the near future. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is considered a paradigm in antimicrobial resistance as it exploits intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms to resist virtually all antibiotics known. AmpC ß-lactamase is the main mechanism driving resistance in this notorious pathogen to ß-lactams, one of the most widely used classes of antibiotics for cystic fibrosis infections. Here, we focus on the ß-lactamase gene as a model resistance determinant and unveil the trajectory P. aeruginosa undertakes on the path toward a multidrug-resistant phenotype during the course of two and a half decades of chronic infection in the airways of a cystic fibrosis patient. Integrating genetic and biochemical studies in the natural environment where evolution occurs, we provide a unique perspective on this challenging landscape, addressing fundamental molecular mechanisms of resistance.
Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis , Pseudomonas Infections , Humans , Cephalosporinase/genetics , Cystic Fibrosis/microbiology , Ceftazidime/pharmacology , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas/metabolism , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Ceftaroline, approved to treat skin infections and pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has been considered for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) infections. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed to describe ceftaroline soft tissue and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) distributions and investigate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of the percentage of the dosing interval that the unbound drug concentration exceeded the MIC (%fT>MIC) to treat MRSA infections. Healthy subjects' plasma and microdialysate concentrations from muscle and subcutaneous tissue following 600 mg every 12 h (q12h) and q8h and neurosurgical patients' plasma and CSF concentrations following single 600-mg dosing were used. Plasma concentrations were described by a two-compartment model, and tissue concentrations were incorporated as three independent compartments linked to the central compartment by bidirectional transport (clearance in [CLin] and CLout). Apparent volumes were fixed to physiological interstitial values. Healthy status and body weight were identified as covariates for the volume of the central compartment, and creatinine clearance was identified for clearance. The CSF glucose concentration (GLUC) was inversely correlated with CLin,CSF. Simulations showed a PTA of >90% in plasma and soft tissues for both regimens assuming an MIC of 1 mg/L and a %fT>MIC of 28.8%. Using the same target, patients with inflamed meninges (0.5 < GLUC ≤ 2 mmol/L) would reach PTAs of 99.8% and 97.2% for 600 mg q8h and q12h, respectively. For brain infection with mild inflammation (2 < GLUC ≤ 3.5 mmol/L), the PTAs would be reduced to 34.3% and 9.1%, respectively. Ceftaroline's penetration enhanced by meningeal inflammation suggests that the drug could be a candidate to treat MRSA CNS infections.
Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brain , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Creatinine , Glucose , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Probability , CeftarolineABSTRACT
Infections by Gram-negative multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial species are difficult to treat using available antibiotics. Overuse of carbapenems has contributed to widespread resistance to these antibiotics; as a result, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), A. baumannii (CRAB), and P. aeruginosa (CRPA) have become common causes of healthcare-associated infections. Carbapenems, tigecycline, and colistin are the last resource antibiotics currently used; however, multiple reports of resistance to these antimicrobial agents have been documented worldwide. Recently, new antibiotics have been evaluated against Gram-negatives, including plazomicin (a new aminoglycoside) to treat CRE infection, eravacycline (a novel tetracycline) with in vitro activity against CRAB, and cefiderocol (a synthetic conjugate) for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia by carbapenem-non-susceptible Gram-negative isolates. Furthermore, combinations of known ß-lactams with recently developed ß-lactam inhibitors, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-tazobactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam, has been suggested for the treatment of infections by extended-spectrum ß-lactamases, carbapenemases, and AmpC producer bacteria. Nonetheless, they are not active against all carbapenemases, and there are reports of resistance to these combinations in clinical isolates.This review summarizes and discusses the in vitro and clinical evidence of the recently approved antibiotics, ß-lactam inhibitors, and those in advanced phases of development for treating MDR infections caused by Gram-negative multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial species.
Subject(s)
Carbapenems , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Tazobactam/pharmacology , Tazobactam/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Cephalosporins are ß-lactam antibiotics, classified into five generations and extensively used in clinical practice against infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens, including Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. Commercially, conventional pharmaceutical forms require high doses to ensure clinical efficacy. Additionally, ß-lactam resistance mechanisms, such as the production of enzymes (called extended-spectrum ß-lactamases) and the low plasma half-life of these antibiotics, have been challenging in clinical therapy based on the use of cephalosporins. In this context, its incorporation into nanoparticles, whether organic or inorganic, is an alternative to temporally and spatially control the drug release and improve its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic limitations. Considering this, the present review unites the cephalosporins encapsulated into organic and inorganic nanoparticles against resistant and nonresistant enterobacteria. We divide cephalosporin generation into subtopics in which we discuss all molecules approved by regulatory agencies. In addition, changes in the side chains at positions R1 and R2 of the central structure of cephalosporins for all semisynthetic derivatives developed were discussed and presented, as the changes in these groups are related to modifications in pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties, respectively. Ultimately, we exhibit the advances and differences in the release profile and in vitro activity of cephalosporins incorporated in different nanoparticles.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cephalosporins , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pseudomonas aeruginosaABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: El uso indebido de cefalosporinas puede provocar resistencia de las bacterias. OBJETIVO: Determinar el perfil de prescripción e indicación de cefalosporinas en un grupo de pacientes afiliados al Sistema de Salud de Colombia. MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal. A partir de una base de datos poblacional se obtuvo una muestra aleatoria de pacientes atendidos en consulta ambulatoria para identificar las indicaciones de cefalosporinas en registros clínicos. Se evaluaron variables farmacológicas relacionadas con formulación no indicada según guías de práctica clínica. RESULTADOS: En 381 pacientes, con edad media 41,2 ± 15,4 años, el 61,4% (n = 234) eran mujeres. Cefalexina fue la más utilizada (n=318; 83,5%), con duración media del tratamiento de 7,3 ± 3,2 días, seguida de cefradina (n = 43, 11,3%) y ceftriaxona (n = 20, 5,2%). Se prescribieron para infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos (n = 177; 46,4%, de las cuales 47,5% eran purulentas), del tracto urinario (n = 70; 18,4%), de vías respiratorias superiores (n = 57; 15,0%), e infecciones de transmisión sexual (n = 21; 5,5%). Estaban indicadas en 169 pacientes (44,4%), pero sólo 103 (60,9%) tenían prescripciones que cumplían las recomendaciones de dosificación. CONCLUSIONES: Más de la mitad de pacientes prescritos con cefalosporinas en un contexto ambulatorio tenían prescripciones consideradas no indicadas, en particular por su uso en infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos purulentas.
BACKGROUND: Misuse of cephalosporins can lead to bacterial resistance. Aim: To determine the prescription profile and indication of cephalosporins in the patients affiliated to the Colombian Health System. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. From a population database, a random sample of patients treated in an outpatient consultation was obtained, to identify the indications of the prescribed cephalosporins in their clinical record. Pharmacological variables, and those related to non-indicated formulations were evaluated according to the clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: In 381 patients, the mean age was 41.2 ± 15.4 years, and 61.4% (n = 234) were women. Cefalexin was the most widely used (n=318; 83.5%), with a mean duration of treatment of 7.3 ± 3.2 days; followed by cefradine (n = 43; 11.3%), and ceftriaxone (n = 20; 5.2%). The most common uses were for skin and soft tissue infections (n = 177; 46.4% of which 47.5% were purulent), urinary tract infections (n = 70; 18.4%), upper respiratory airway infections (n = 57; 15.0%) and sexually transmitted diseases (n = 21; 5.5%). The use was considered indicated in 169 patients (44.4%), but only 103 (60.9%) had prescriptions that met the dosage recommendations from the clinical practice guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the patients prescribed with cephalosporins in the outpatient setting had prescriptions considered not indicated, particularly for their use in purulent skin and soft tissue infections.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Respiratory Tract Infections , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy , Outpatients , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Colombia , Prescriptions , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recurrent subclinical mastitis (RScM) due to resistant bacteria has low clinical and bacteriological cure rates, often requiring the culling of cows. The sequential intra-mammary administration of enrofloxacin hydrochloride-dihydrate (enro-C) followed by ceftiofur HCl may be useful for treating these cases. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the bacteriological and clinical cure-efficacies of the sequentially intramammary administration of enro-C, followed by ceftiofur HCl to treat RScM in Holstein/Friesian cows. METHODS: This trial was conducted in a herd with a high prevalence of RScM, and 20 Holstein/Friesian cows were included: 45% suffering subclinical mastitis and 38.9% of the mammary quarters affected. Twenty-nine bacterial isolates in vitro resistant to enro-C were obtained (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp, 55.2%; Staphylococcus aureus, 27.6%; Escherichia coli, 6.9%; Streptococcus uberis, 6.9%; Corynebacterium bovis, 3.4%). Polymerase chain reaction-isolated the following genes linked to enro-C resistance: chromosomal (gyrA) and plasmid (aac(6')-lb-cr). The treatments were as follows: twice-daily intramammary infusions of enro-C (300 mg/10 mL) for 5 days. Cows clinically considered treatment failures were also treated with intramammary ceftiofur (125 mg/10 mL, twice daily for 5 days. The clinical and bacteriological cure rates were carried out when completing each treatment phase and at 14 and 21 days, aided by a California mastitis test, somatic cell count, and failure to identify the initially causative bacteria. RESULTS: Enro-C achieved 65% clinical and bacteriological cure rates, and 100% cure rates were obtained after the rescue treatment with ceftiofur HCl. CONCLUSIONS: Outstanding clinical and bacteriological cure rates in cows affected by RScM were achieved with the consecutive intramammary infusions of enro-C, followed by ceftiofur HCl.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Enrofloxacin/therapeutic use , Mastitis, Bovine/drug therapy , Animals , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Cattle , Cephalosporins/administration & dosage , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enrofloxacin/administration & dosage , Female , Hydrochloric Acid , Mastitis, Bovine/microbiology , RecurrenceABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: The second of a two-part series, this article describes eight recently approved drugs, including the first drug approved for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2, a first-in-class HIV attachment inhibitor, and a new intravenous injection indicated for the treatment of acute pain in adults for whom other treatments are ineffective.
Subject(s)
Drug Approval , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/therapeutic use , Amisulpride/therapeutic use , Carbamates/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Chlorophenols/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Fumarates/therapeutic use , Humans , Indans/therapeutic use , Organophosphates/therapeutic use , Oxadiazoles/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Spiro Compounds/therapeutic use , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Tromethamine/therapeutic use , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , CefiderocolABSTRACT
Introducción: La endocarditis bacteriana es una enfermedad poco frecuente, ocasionada en la mayor parte de casos por organismos gram positivos, como estafilococos y estreptococos, seguido por organismos del grupo HACEK y raramente por gram negativos no HACEK. Su incidencia es baja, pero se relaciona con una alta mortalidad; existen diversos factores de riesgo asociados: edad avanzada, sexo femenino, antecedente de cirugías cardiacas, válvulas protésicas, uso de catéteres venosos centrales o urinarios. Objetivo: Describir la evidencia disponible sobre endocarditis bacteriana por Escherichia coli. Desarrollo: Se describe el caso de un paciente adulto mayor, sin antecedentes quirúrgicos cardíacos, que presenta cuadro de desorientación, astenia, adinamia, elevación de la temperatura corporal, asociados a infección urinaria, que luego de recibir piperacilina-tazobactam por 7 días, persiste con alzas térmicas. Hemocultivos confirman bacteriemia por Escherichia coli y en ecocardiograma transesofágico se logra la visualización de una vegetación a nivel de válvula aórtica nativa. El paciente recibió tratamiento antibiótico con cefalosporina de tercera generación por 30 días, con mejoría clínica, eco transesofágico de control sin vegetaciones, ni necesidad inmediata de tratamiento quirúrgico. Conclusiones: La sospecha clínica de endocarditis es importante en el momento de solicitar exámenes diagnósticos e interpretar sus resultados(AU)
Introduction: Bacterial endocarditis is a rare disease, caused in most cases by gram-positive organisms, such as staphylococci and streptococci, followed by HACEK group organisms and rarely by non-HACEK gram-negative organisms. Its incidence is low, but it is related to high mortality; there are several associated risk factors: advanced age, female sex, history of heart surgery, prosthetic valves, use of central venous or urinary catheters. Objective: To describe the available evidence on bacterial endocarditis due to Escherichia coli. Case report: We describe the case of an elderly patient, without a history of cardiac surgery, who showed disorientation, asthenia, adynamia, elevation of body temperature, associated with urinary infection, persisting after taken piperacillin-tazobactam for 7 days with temperature rises. Blood cultures confirm Escherichia coli bacteremia and transesophageal echocardiography exhibited vegetation at the native aortic valve level. The patient received antibiotic treatment with third-generation cephalosporin for 30 days, with clinical improvement, echo transesophageal control with no vegetations, and no immediate need for surgical treatment. Conclusions: The clinical suspicion of endocarditis is vital when requesting diagnostic tests and interpreting their results(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Misuse of cephalosporins can lead to bacterial resistance. AIM: To determine the prescription profile and indication of cephalosporins in the patients affiliated to the Colombian Health System. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. From a population database, a random sample of patients treated in an outpatient consultation was obtained, to identify the indications of the prescribed cephalosporins in their clinical record. Pharmacological variables, and those related to non-indicated formulations were evaluated according to the clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: In 381 patients, the mean age was 41.2 ± 15.4 years, and 61.4% (n = 234) were women. Cefalexin was the most widely used (n=318; 83.5%), with a mean duration of treatment of 7.3 ± 3.2 days; followed by cefradine (n = 43; 11.3%), and ceftriaxone (n = 20; 5.2%). The most common uses were for skin and soft tissue infections (n = 177; 46.4% of which 47.5% were purulent), urinary tract infections (n = 70; 18.4%), upper respiratory airway infections (n = 57; 15.0%) and sexually transmitted diseases (n = 21; 5.5%). The use was considered indicated in 169 patients (44.4%), but only 103 (60.9%) had prescriptions that met the dosage recommendations from the clinical practice guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the patients prescribed with cephalosporins in the outpatient setting had prescriptions considered not indicated, particularly for their use in purulent skin and soft tissue infections.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Tract Infections , Soft Tissue Infections , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Colombia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prescriptions , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: Existe poca información acerca de la efectividad de las combinaciones ceftolozano/tazobactam y ceftazidima/avibactam en cepas clínicamente relevantes aisladas en México. Objetivo: Determinar el perfil antimicrobiano de ambos antibióticos en nuestra comunidad. Método: El presente estudio de investigación fue prospectivo, descriptivo y transversal. Se incluyeron cepas clínicamente relevantes aisladas a partir de cultivos de cepa pura durante el periodo de agosto de 2018 a enero de 2019 en Mexicali, Baja California, México. Resultados: Se analizaron 74 cepas de enterobacterias y 19 cepas de Pseudomonas aeruginosa; el porcentaje de sensibilidad de ceftazidima/avibactam fue de 100 % contra enterobacterias y de 72.7 % contra Pseudomonas aeruginosa; el porcentaje de sensibilidad de ceftolozano/tazobactam fue de 90.5 % para enterobacterias y de 72.7 % para Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusiones: Las combinaciones ceftolozano/tazobactam y ceftazidima/avibactam ofrecen buena sensibilidad antimicrobiana in vitro, tanto contra enterobacterias productoras de betalactamasas de espectro extendido como contra Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Se requieren más datos para valorar la respuesta clínica en pacientes que reciben esas combinaciones de antibióticos.
Abstract Introduction: There is limited information on the effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam combinations on clinically relevant strains isolated in Mexico. Objective: To determine the antimicrobial profile of both antibiotic combinations in our community. Method: The present research study was prospective, descriptive and cross-sectional. Clinically relevant strains isolated from pure-strain cultures were included during the period from August 2018 to January 2019 in Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico. Results: 74 enterobacteriaceae and 19 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were analyzed; the percentage of sensitivity of ceftazidime/avibactam was 100 % for enterobacteriaceae and 72.7 % for Pseudomonas aeruginosa; the percentage of sensitivity of ceftolozane/tazobactam for enterobacteriaceae was 90.5 % and 72.7 % for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusions: The ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam combinations offer good antimicrobial sensitivity in vitro, both for ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. More data are required to assess clinical response in patients receiving these antibiotic combinations.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Drug Combinations , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Tazobactam/therapeutic use , MexicoABSTRACT
La trombosis séptica del seno cavernoso se conoce como una complicación rara y potencialmente mortal de las infecciones en el área de la cabeza y el cuello. Aunque el uso de antibióticos ha mejorado el pronóstico, todavía es conocida por sus altas tasas de mortalidad y morbilidad. Objetivo: Analizar la presencia de la trombosis séptica de seno cavernoso mediante el estudio de un caso único. Metodología: De tipo observacional, cualitativa y de corte transversal, apoyado con sustento bibliográfico. Resultado: Caso de una paciente joven de sexo femenino que presenta una semana después de tener sintomatología de Covid, cefalea holocraneana, oftalmoplejía derecha, disminución de la agudeza visual, dolor, eritema, edema, tumefacción orbitaria, secreción ocular amarillenta supurativa derecha, se le realiza tomografía de cerebro evidenciándose de forma incidental trombosis del seno cavernoso. Conclusiones: Se determinó que la trombosis séptica de seno cavernoso es un diagnóstico de poca frecuencia y rara. Asimismo, la trombosis del seno cavernoso tiene la tasa más alta de mortalidad. En raras ocasiones, la infección del oído medio puede ser una causa de trombosis séptica del seno cavernoso y la respuesta al tratamiento es deficiente(AU)
Cavernous sinus septic thrombosis is a rare and life-threatening complication of infections in the head and neck area. Although the use of antibiotics has improved the prognosis, it still known for its high mortality and morbidity rates. Objective: To analyze the presence of cavernous sinus septic thrombosis by studying a single case. Methodology: Observational, qualitative and cross-sectional, supported by bibliographic support. Result: Case of a young female patient who presented one week after having symptoms of Covid, holocranial headache, right ophthalmoplegia, decreased visual acuity, pain, erythema, edema, orbital swelling, right suppurative yellowish eye discharge, was performed brain tomography, incidentally showing cavernous sinus thrombosis. Conclusions: It was determined that cavernous sinus septic thrombosis is an infrequent and rare diagnosis. In addition, cavernous sinus thrombosis has the highest mortality rate. In rare cases, middle ear infection can be a cause of cavernous sinus septic thrombosis and response to treatment is poor(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Intracranial Thrombosis/complications , Intracranial Thrombosis/mortality , Cavernous Sinus Thrombosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cavernous Sinus , Headache , Infections , Anti-Infective AgentsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) affects 4% to 12% of women of reproductive age. The main intervention for acute PID is broad-spectrum antibiotics administered intravenously, intramuscularly or orally. We assessed the optimal treatment regimen for PID. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic regimens to treat PID. SEARCH METHODS: In January 2020, we searched the Cochrane Sexually Transmitted Infections Review Group's Specialized Register, which included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from 1944 to 2020, located through hand and electronic searching; CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; four other databases; and abstracts in selected publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs comparing antibiotics with placebo or other antibiotics for the treatment of PID in women of reproductive age, either as inpatient or outpatient treatment. We limited our review to a comparison of drugs in current use that are recommended by the 2015 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for treatment of PID. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias and conducted GRADE assessments of the quality of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 39 RCTs (6894 women) in this review, adding two new RCTs at this update. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to high, the main limitations being serious risk of bias (due to poor reporting of study methods and lack of blinding), serious inconsistency, and serious imprecision. None of the studies reported quinolones and cephalosporins, or the outcomes laparoscopic evidence of resolution of PID based on physician opinion or fertility outcomes. Length of stay results were insufficiently reported for analysis. Regimens containing azithromycin versus regimens containing doxycycline We are uncertain whether there was a clinically relevant difference between azithromycin and doxycycline in rates of cure for mild-moderate PID (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.55; 2 RCTs, 243 women; I2 = 72%; very low-quality evidence). The analyses may result in little or no difference between azithromycin and doxycycline in rates of severe PID (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05; 1 RCT, 309 women; low-quality evidence), or adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.34; 3 RCTs, 552 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). In a sensitivity analysis limited to a single study at low risk of bias, azithromycin probably improves the rates of cure in mild-moderate PID (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.67; 133 women; moderate-quality evidence), compared to doxycycline. Regimens containing quinolone versus regimens containing cephalosporin The analysis shows there may be little or no clinically relevant difference between quinolones and cephalosporins in rates of cure for mild-moderate PID (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14; 4 RCTs, 772 women; I2 = 15%; low-quality evidence), or severe PID (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.23; 2 RCTs, 313 women; I2 = 7%; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether there was a difference between quinolones and cephalosporins in adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment (RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.52 to 9.72; 6 RCTs, 1085 women; I2 = 0%; very low-quality evidence). Regimens with nitroimidazole versus regimens without nitroimidazole There was probably little or no difference between regimens with or without nitroimidazoles (metronidazole) in rates of cure for mild-moderate PID (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.09; 6 RCTs, 2660 women; I2 = 50%; moderate-quality evidence), or severe PID (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.01; 11 RCTs, 1383 women; I2 = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). The evidence suggests that there was little to no difference in in adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.61; 17 studies, 4021 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). . In a sensitivity analysis limited to studies at low risk of bias, there was little or no difference for rates of cure in mild-moderate PID (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12; 3 RCTs, 1434 women; I2 = 0%; high-quality evidence). Regimens containing clindamycin plus aminoglycoside versus quinolone We are uncertain whether quinolone have little to no effect in rates of cure for mild-moderate PID compared to clindamycin plus aminoglycoside (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.13; 1 RCT, 25 women; very low-quality evidence). The analysis may result in little or no difference between quinolone vs. clindamycin plus aminoglycoside in severe PID (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.19; 2 studies, 151 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether quinolone reduces adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.72; 3 RCTs, 163 women; I2 = 0%; very low-quality evidence). Regimens containing clindamycin plus aminoglycoside versus regimens containing cephalosporin We are uncertain whether clindamycin plus aminoglycoside improves the rates of cure for mild-moderate PID compared to cephalosporin (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.09; 2 RCTs, 150 women; I2 = 0%; low-quality evidence). There was probably little or no difference in rates of cure in severe PID with clindamycin plus aminoglycoside compared to cephalosporin (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.06; 10 RCTs, 959 women; I2= 21%; moderate-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether clindamycin plus aminoglycoside reduces adverse effects leading to discontinuation of treatment compared to cephalosporin (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.42; 10 RCTs, 1172 women; I2 = 0%; very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are uncertain whether one treatment was safer or more effective than any other for the cure of mild-moderate or severe PID Based on a single study at a low risk of bias, a macrolide (azithromycin) probably improves the rates of cure of mild-moderate PID, compared to tetracycline (doxycycline).
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aminoglycosides/adverse effects , Aminoglycosides/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Azithromycin/adverse effects , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/adverse effects , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Clindamycin/adverse effects , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Doxycycline/adverse effects , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Nitroimidazoles/adverse effects , Nitroimidazoles/therapeutic use , Pelvic Inflammatory Disease/microbiology , Publication Bias , Quinolones/adverse effects , Quinolones/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of antibiotic usage for the treatment of puerperal metritis (PM) and its association with reproductive performance, a retrospective cohort study including a total of 9168 records of cows from a dairy farm in Argentina was run. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cows having a PM3 (metricheck, scale 0-3) and treated with ceftiofur (ceftiofur crystalline free acid, 6.6 mg/kg) at 0-21 days postpartum (p. p.) (n = 2688), and cows having a PM 1-2 and not treated with an antibiotic at 0-21 days p. p. (n = 6480) were included in the study. All cows were reexamined with metricheck to assess the clinical cure (vaginal discharge [VD] score 0), partial cure (VD score similar or lower than previous), no cure (VD score higher than previous). Cows with a metricheck VD1-3 after 0-21 days p. p. were diagnosed as clinical endometritis (CE) 1-3. The occurrence of PM1-3, cure rate, calving to conception interval, the hazard of pregnancy, odds for non-pregnancy, and odds for CE were analyzed using SAS software. RESULTS: A total of 8876 PM1-3 records were included, 2435 records of PM3 treatments with ceftiofur (27.43 %), and 6441 records of PM1-2 (72.57 %) with no treatment. Cows having PM1 and PM2 became pregnant 14 and 12 days earlier than cows with PM3 (p < 0.001). The PM3 ceftiofur treated cows had a clinical cure of 24.85 % (PM0); 53.63 % had a partially cure; and 18.52 % no cure. Conversely, cows with PM1-2 had a 51.96 %, 20.70 %, and 24.53 % cure rate, respectively (p < 0.001). Cows having complete cure became pregnant 13 and 11 days earlier than cows having partial cure and no cure (p < 0.001). Cows that had PM3 during the first 21 days p. p. had twice the chances of developing CE compared to cows having PM1-2 (41.28 % vs. 24.14 %, p < 0.001). After 21 days p. p., less than 1 % of cows with clinical cure developed CE compared to 63.32 % that developed CE with partial cure, and 38.21 % with no cure (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: After ceftiofur treatment, 78 % of cows were cured when measured by disappearance of fetid VD but only 25 % of cows had clinical cure when measured by appearance of a clear VD. The cows that remained with clinical metritis had more chances of having CE after 21 days p. p. and had more days open than cows with clear normal VD.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cattle Diseases , Pregnancy/statistics & numerical data , Puerperal Infection , Uterine Diseases , Animals , Argentina , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Dairying , Endometritis , Female , Puerperal Infection/drug therapy , Puerperal Infection/epidemiology , Puerperal Infection/veterinary , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Diseases/drug therapy , Uterine Diseases/epidemiology , Uterine Diseases/veterinary , Vaginal DischargeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There is limited information on the effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam combinations on clinically relevant strains isolated in Mexico. OBJECTIVE: To determine the antimicrobial profile of both antibiotic combinations in our community. METHOD: The present research study was prospective, descriptive and cross-sectional. Clinically relevant strains isolated from pure-strain cultures were included during the period from August 2018 to January 2019 in Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico. RESULTS: 74 enterobacteriaceae and 19 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were analyzed; the percentage of sensitivity of ceftazidime/avibactam was 100 % for enterobacteriaceae and 72.7 % for Pseudomonas aeruginosa; the percentage of sensitivity of ceftolozane/tazobactam for enterobacteriaceae was 90.5 % and 72.7 % for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: The ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam combinations offer good antimicrobial sensitivity in vitro, both for ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. More data are required to assess clinical response in patients receiving these antibiotic combinations. INTRODUCCIÓN: Existe poca información acerca de la efectividad de las combinaciones ceftolozano/tazobactam y ceftazidima/avibactam en cepas clínicamente relevantes aisladas en México. OBJETIVO: Determinar el perfil antimicrobiano de ambos antibióticos en nuestra comunidad. MÉTODO: El presente estudio de investigación fue prospectivo, descriptivo y transversal. Se incluyeron cepas clínicamente relevantes aisladas a partir de cultivos de cepa pura durante el periodo de agosto de 2018 a enero de 2019 en Mexicali, Baja California, México. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 74 cepas de enterobacterias y 19 cepas de Pseudomonas aeruginosa; el porcentaje de sensibilidad de ceftazidima/avibactam fue de 100 % contra enterobacterias y de 72.7 % contra Pseudomonas aeruginosa; el porcentaje de sensibilidad de ceftolozano/tazobactam fue de 90.5 % para enterobacterias y de 72.7 % para Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONES: Las combinaciones ceftolozano/tazobactam y ceftazidima/avibactam ofrecen buena sensibilidad antimicrobiana in vitro, tanto contra enterobacterias productoras de betalactamasas de espectro extendido como contra Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Se requieren más datos para valorar la respuesta clínica en pacientes que reciben esas combinaciones de antibióticos.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Tazobactam/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Combinations , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Humans , Mexico , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purificationABSTRACT
Mastitis is a major disease affecting dairy sheep. It is caused by microorganisms that generate inflammation of the mammary gland in response to tissue invasion. This syndrome affects the welfare of ewes, as well as the production and quality of the milk, thereby reducing its productive efficiency. Because mastitis causes inflammation process, it also increases the production of free radicals that cause lesions via lipoperoxidation, causing damage to proteins, cells and tissues. One way to minimize the impact of the disease is antimicrobial treatment. Nevertheless, the continuous use of antimicrobials contributes to microbial resistance, in addition to producing residues in the milk and derivatives if not given during the grace period. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of subclinical mastitis on ewe health, milk production, milk composition and quality. We also evaluated the susceptibility of the bacteria in vitro using disk diffusion antibiograms. Finally, we performed two-way testing of efficacy of treatment in Lacaune ewes using the same agents. In the first stage of the study, 30 lactating ewes (±90 days) were used, 10 of which were negative on the CMT (California Mastitis Test) used as control group (CG) and 20 sheep with subclinical mastitis diagnosed by CMT (MG). Samples were collected and several analyses were performed on the milk and blood. We found that ewes in the MG had higher lipid peroxidation in serum and milk, as well as lower production, with reduction of the total dry extract in milk. There were 15 isolates of Staphylococcus hyicus, four isolates of each S. epidermidis and S. intermedius, and two isolates of Corynebacterium spp. The primary hematological result was leukocytosis in ewes with mastitis. Based on the antibiogram, we chose ceftiofur for in vivo tests. In this stage, we divided the sheep with subclinical mastitis into two subgroups of 10 ewes each, to receive drug by two routes: intramuscular (IM) and intramammary (IMM). In the IMM group, of the 10 CMT-positive ewes at the beginning of the experiment, seven were already negative by the racket test 120â¯h after the last application (70% efficacy). In the IM group, of the 10 positive ewes, only four were negative after 120â¯h of the final application, a low efficacy treatment (40%). We evaluated antimicrobial residues in the milk of treated animals. We found this material within 5 days after treatment in the two forms used; despite the fact that the product's stated withholding period is 3 days. We conclude that ewes with mastitis produce less milk of lower quality. We also conclude that, although ceftiofur is 100% effective in vitro, when used in ewes with mastitis, the efficacy did not exceed 70%, and was more efficient when administered via the intramammary route.