ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Varicella is a highly infectious disease, particularly affecting children, that can lead to complications requiring antibiotics or hospitalization. Antibiotic use for varicella management is poorly documented. This study assessed antibiotic use for varicella and its complications in a pediatric population in England. METHODS: Data were drawn from medical records in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics data sets. The study included patients <18 years old with varicella diagnosed during 2014-2018 and 3-month follow-up available. We determined varicella-related complications, medication use, healthcare resource utilization, and costs from diagnosis until 3 months after diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 114 578 children with a primary varicella diagnosis. Of these, 7.7% (n = 8814) had a varicella-related complication, the most common being ear, nose, and throat related (37.1% [n = 3271]). In all, 25.9% (n = 29 706 of 114 578) were prescribed antibiotics. A higher proportion of patients with complications than without complications were prescribed antibiotics (64.3% [n = 5668 of 8814] vs 22.7% [n = 24 038 of 105 764]). Mean annualized varicella-related costs were £2 231 481 for the study cohort. Overall, antibiotic prescriptions cost approximately £262 007. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights high antibiotic use and healthcare resource utilization associated with varicella management, particularly in patients with complications. A national varicella vaccination program in England may reduce varicella burden and related complications, medication use, and costs.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Chickenpox , Humans , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/drug therapy , Chickenpox/epidemiology , England/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Retrospective Studies , Infant , Adolescent , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Cost of Illness , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In South Korea, the National Immunization Program has included one-dose varicella vaccination for 1-year-olds since 2005. This study examines the potential impact of introducing a two-dose varicella vaccination for children, along with zoster vaccination for adults, using either the zoster vaccine live (ZVL) or recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV). METHODS: The investigation considered four strategies in a base case scenario. The first involved introducing zoster vaccination for 60-year-olds, with a 60 % coverage. The second strategy combined zoster vaccination with a second-dose varicella vaccination for 4-year-olds, with a 90 % coverage. An age-structured model spanning 50 years was employed, assuming a zoster vaccine catch-up campaign over the initial 5 years. Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted, assessing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs), and net loss under different ages at zoster vaccination (50, 60, 65, and 70 years) and varying willingness-to-pay (WTP) levels from â©40 million ($34,998) to â©84 million ($74,000). RESULTS: All strategies were cost-effective and significantly reduced herpes zoster (HZ) incidence, preventing approximately 3,077,000 to 7,609,000 cases, depending on the chosen strategy. The combined strategy prevented around 4,950,000 varicella and 653,000 HZ cases additionally. RZV outperformed ZVL by preventing twice as many HZ cases and offering greater QALY gains. However, ZVL was more cost-effective due to its lower cost. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that RZV became more cost-effective at higher WTP thresholds, exceeding â©60.9 million ($53,193) in terms of ICER and â©62.5 million ($54,591) for INMBs and net loss. The optimal age for zoster vaccination was 60 years concerning ICER but 50 years regarding INMB. CONCLUSIONS: Combining RZV with a two-dose varicella vaccination strategy reduced the disease burden and improved QALY more effectively, though ZVL remained more cost-effective at lower WTP levels. Decisions regarding vaccination policies should be balanced between the public health needs and WTP levels.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine , Chickenpox , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster Vaccine , Herpes Zoster , Models, Theoretical , Vaccination , Humans , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster/economics , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox Vaccine/immunology , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Child, Preschool , Aged , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/methods , Male , Female , Immunization Programs/economics , Child , Infant , Adult , Incidence , Herpesvirus 3, Human/immunologyABSTRACT
Italy implemented two-dose universal varicella vaccination (UVV) regionally from 2003 to 2013 and nationally from 2017 onwards. Our objective was to analyze regional disparities in varicella outcomes resulting from disparities in vaccine coverage rates (VCRs) projected over a 50-year time-horizon (2020-2070). A previously published dynamic transmission model was updated to quantify the potential public health impact of the UVV program in Italy at the national and regional levels. Four 2-dose vaccine strategies utilizing monovalent (V) and quadrivalent (MMRV) vaccines were evaluated for each region: (A) MMRV-MSD/MMRV-MSD, (B) MMRV-GSK/MMRV-GSK, (C) V-MSD/MMRV-MSD, and (D) V-GSK/MMRV-GSK. Costs were reported in 2022 Euros. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted 3% annually. Under strategy A, the three regions with the lowest first-dose VCR reported increased varicella cases (+ 34.3%), hospitalizations (+ 20.0%), QALYs lost (+ 5.9%), payer costs (+ 22.2%), and societal costs (+ 14.6%) over the 50-year time-horizon compared to the three regions with highest first-dose VCR. Regions with low first-dose VCR were more sensitive to changes in VCR than high first-dose VCR regions. Results with respect to second-dose VCR were qualitatively similar, although smaller in magnitude. Results were similar across all vaccine strategies.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine , Chickenpox , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox/economics , Vaccination Coverage/economics , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Child , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Child, Preschool , Vaccination/economics , Male , Adolescent , Infant , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs , Immunization Programs/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The cost effectiveness of childhood varicella vaccination is uncertain, as evidenced by variation in national health policies. Within the European Economic Area (EEA), only 10 of 30 countries offer universally funded childhood varicella vaccination. This study estimates the cost effectiveness of universal childhood varicella vaccination for one EEA country (Ireland), highlighting the difference in cost effectiveness between alternative vaccination strategies. METHODS: An age-structured dynamic transmission model, simulating varicella zoster virus transmission, was developed to analyse the impact of three vaccination strategies; one-dose at 12 months old, two-dose at 12 and 15 months old (short-interval), and two-dose at 12 months and five years old (long-interval). The analysis adopted an 80-year time horizon and considered payer and societal perspectives. Clinical effectiveness was based on cases of varicella and subsequently herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia avoided, and outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were presented in 2022 Irish Euro and cost effectiveness was interpreted with reference to a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20,000 per QALY gained. RESULTS: From the payer perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for a one-dose strategy, compared with no vaccination, was estimated at 8,712 per QALY gained. The ICER for the next least expensive strategy, two-dose long-interval, compared with one-dose, was estimated at 45,090 per QALY gained. From a societal perspective, all three strategies were cost-saving compared with no vaccination; the two-dose short-interval strategy dominated, yielding the largest cost savings and health benefits. Results were stable across a range of sensitivity and scenario analyses. CONCLUSION: A one-dose strategy was highly cost effective from the payer perspective, driven by a reduction in hospitalisations. Two-dose strategies were cost saving from the societal perspective. These results should be considered alongside other factors such as acceptability of a new vaccine within the overall childhood immunisation schedule, programme objectives and budget impact.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine , Chickenpox , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Vaccination , Humans , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox Vaccine/immunology , Ireland , Infant , Child, Preschool , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/methods , Female , Male , Child , Immunization Programs/economics , Adolescent , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: La varicela es una infección relevante en la salud pública de Chile, pudiendo causar en algunas ocasiones complicaciones graves e incluso la muerte, lo que se asocia a un significativo gasto en salud. En Chile sólo se realiza vigilancia centinela a nivel ambulatorio, sin conocerse el impacto de la varicela en casos más graves que determinan hospitalización. OBJETIVOS: Realizar una descripción clínica y de los costos asociados a la atención de niños hospitalizados con diagnóstico de varicela, en años previos a la introducción de la vacuna en el Programa Nacional de Inmunización en Chile. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio multicéntrico, observacional y retrospectivo, en todos los casos de niños hospitalizados (0-15 años) con diagnóstico de varicela, entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2015 en cinco hospitales de Chile. Se realizó revisión de fichas para evaluar características clínicas de la enfermedad y los costos asociados a la hospitalización por varicela. RESULTADOS: Un total de 685 hospitalizaciones por varicela fueron incluidas en el estudio. La mediana de edad fue de 3 años (RIC:1-5), siendo la mayoría de los niños con edades comprendidas entre los 1 y 4 años (52% del total de casos). El 56% fueron hombres y sólo 7 niño s (1%) tuvieron antecedente de vacuna varicela. La mediana de días de hospitalización fue de 3 días en cada episodio (RIC: 2-5). El 13% de los casos requirió hospitalización en unidades de mayor complejidad, 7% de los niños ingresó a Unidad de Tratamiento Intensivo y 6% ingresó a Intermedio, ambos con una mediana de 3 días de hospitalización. Las principales complicaciones fueron: infección de piel y tejidos blandos (42%), alteraciones neurológicas (8%) y shock séptico/tóxico (4%). La letalidad fue de 0,4%. El costo de un caso de varicela considerando los costos directos fue de US$417, el costo indirecto fue de US$224 y los costos proporcionales de una muerte de US$3.575. Se estima que el costo total de un caso de varicela hospitalizado en Chile, considerando todos los factores anteriores, fue de US$4.216. CONCLUSIONES: La varicela es una enfermedad inmunoprevenible frecuente. Se observaron casos con una mediana de 3 días de hospitalización por complicaciones, con 13% de los casos requiriendo hospitalización en unidades de mayor complejidad, con un alto costo asociado, que se estima podría disminuir significativamente con la reciente incorporación de la vacuna al Programa Nacional de Inmunizaciones.
BACKGROUND: Varicella is a relevant infection in Chile and may cause serious complications and death, which could be associated with significant health care resource utilization and associated costs. In Chile, sentinel surveillance is carried out only on an outpatient basis, without knowing the impact of varicella in serious cases who need to be hospitalized. AIM: To describe the clinical characteristics and the costs associated with hospitalized children with diagnosis of varicella prior to the vaccine introduction in the National Immunization Program in Chile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, observational, and retrospective study in hospitalized children (0-15 years) with a diagnosis of varicella, were conducted in five hospitals in Chile between January 2011 and December 2015. A review of the clinical records was performed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of the disease and costs associated with hospitalization episodes for varicella. RESULTS: A total of 685 hospitalized children for varicella were included in this study. The median age was 3 years (IQR: 1-5), most children were between 1 and 4 years of age (52% of total cases). 56% were male, and only 7 patients (1%) had a history of previous varicella vaccination. The median lenght of days of hospitalization was 3 days (IQR: 2-5). 13% of the cases required hospitalization in a more complex care unit, 6% in the intermediate unit and 7% in the pediatric intensive treatment unit, both with a median stay of 3 days. The main complications were: skin and soft tissue infections (42%), neurologic (8%) and septic or toxic shock (4%). There were 3 cases of death (0.4%). The direct cost of a varicella case was US $ 417, the indirect cost was US $ 224 and the proportional cost of a case of death was US $ 3,575. It is estimated that the total cost of a hospitalized varicella case in Chile was US $ 4,216. CONCLUSIONS: Varicella is associated with a significant burden of disease in Chile. The median hospital stay was three days with 13% of cases requiring medical care in a complex unit, with high associated costs which could be significantly reduced with the recently incorporation of the varicella vaccine into the National Immunization Program.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Chickenpox/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Chickenpox/complications , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox/therapy , Chile , Retrospective Studies , Health Care Costs , Cost of Illness , Chickenpox VaccineABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Comprehensive cost-effectiveness analyses of introducing varicella and/or herpes zoster vaccination in the Swedish national vaccination programme. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analyses based on epidemiological results from a specifically developed transmission model. SETTING: National vaccination programme in Sweden, over an 85- or 20-year time horizon depending on the vaccination strategy. PARTICIPANTS: Hypothetical cohorts of people aged 12 months and 65-years at baseline. INTERVENTIONS: Four alternative vaccination strategies; 1, not to vaccinate; 2, varicella vaccination with one dose of the live attenuated vaccine at age 12 months and a second dose at age 18 months; 3, herpes zoster vaccination with one dose of the live attenuated vaccine at 65 years of age; and 4, both vaccine against varicella and herpes zoster with the before-mentioned strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accumulated cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for each strategy, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). RESULTS: It would be cost-effective to vaccinate against varicella (dominant), but not to vaccinate against herpes zoster (ICER of EUR 200,000), assuming a cost-effectiveness threshold of EUR 50,000 per QALY. The incremental analysis between varicella vaccination only and the combined programme results in a cost per gained QALY of almost EUR 1.6 million. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study are central components for policy-relevant decision-making, and suggest that it was cost-effective to introduce varicella vaccination in Sweden, whereas herpes zoster vaccination with the live attenuated vaccine for the elderly was not cost-effective-the health effects of the latter vaccination cannot be considered reasonable in relation to its costs. Future observational and surveillance studies are needed to make reasonable predictions on how boosting affects the herpes zoster incidence in the population, and thus the cost-effectiveness of a vaccination programme against varicella. Also, the link between herpes zoster and sequelae need to be studied in more detail to include it suitably in health economic evaluations.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Immunization Programs/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/transmission , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster/economics , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster/transmission , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/economics , Herpesvirus 3, Human/immunology , Herpesvirus 3, Human/pathogenicity , Humans , Immunization Programs/methods , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Models, Economic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sweden/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Virus Activation , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The value of chickenpox vaccination is still debated in the literature and by jurisdictions worldwide. This uncertainty is reflected in the inconsistent uptake of the vaccine, where some countries offer routine childhood immunization programs, others have targeted programs, and in many the vaccine is only privately available. Even across the countries that have universal funding for the vaccine, there is a diversity of schedules and dosing intervals. Using an agent-based model of chickenpox and shingles, we conducted an economic evaluation of chickenpox vaccination in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: We compared the cost-effectiveness of 2 common chickenpox vaccination schedules, specifically a long dosing interval (first dose: 12 months; second dose: 4-6 years) and a short dosing interval (first dose: 12 months; second dose: 18 months). RESULTS: The economic evaluation demonstrated a shorter dosing interval may be marginally preferred, although it consistently led to higher costs from both the societal and healthcare perspectives. We found that chickenpox vaccination would be cost-saving and highly cost-effective from the societal and healthcare perspective, assuming there was no impact on shingles. CONCLUSION: Chickenpox vaccine was cost-effective when not considering shingles and remained so even if there was a minor increase in shingles following vaccination. However, if chickenpox vaccination did lead to a substantial increase in shingles, then chickenpox vaccination was not cost-effective from the healthcare perspective.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Immunization Schedule , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alberta/epidemiology , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Expenditures , Health Services/economics , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunization Programs/economics , Infant , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Young AdultABSTRACT
This systematic literature review was conducted to better understand the epidemiology and burden of varicella across the Middle East, gain insight into the evidence to support using universal varicella vaccination (UVV), and identify potential data gaps. Both epidemiology and economic data on the burden of varicella were limited and varied significantly. Most of the data focussed on varicella burden in the absence of a UVV program. In the absence of UVV, varicella incidence is increasing across this region with varicella infection associated with substantial morbidity. Although limited, data on the impact of vaccination at a population level indicated UVV programs reduce varicella incidence and hospitalizations, in line with global experience. Further research and action are needed to better understand varicella epidemiology in the Middle East, increase awareness and understanding in the region, and provide local data to support national public-health decisions regarding the implementation of UVV programs.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunization Programs , Incidence , Middle East/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 2013, Turkey introduced one-dose universal varicella vaccination (UVV) at 12 months of age. Inclusion of a second dose is being considered. METHODS: We developed a dynamic transmission model to evaluate three vaccination strategies: single dose at 12 months (1D) or second dose at either 18 months (2D-short) or 6 years of age (2D-long). Costs and utilization were age-stratified and separated into inpatient and outpatient costs for varicella and herpes zoster (HZ). We ran the model including and excluding HZ-related costs and impact of exogenous boosting. RESULTS: Five years post-introduction of UVV (1D), the projected varicella incidence rate decreases from 1,674 cases pre-vaccine to 80 cases/100,000 person-years. By 25 years, varicella incidence equilibrates at 39, 12, and 16 cases/100,000 person-years for 1D, 2D-short, and 2D-long strategies, respectively, using a highly effective vaccine. With or without including exogenous boosting impact and/or HZ-related costs and health benefits, the 1D strategy is least costly, but 2-dose strategies are cost-effective considering a willingness-to-pay threshold equivalent to the gross domestic product. The model predicted a modest increase in HZ burden during the first 20-30 years, after which time HZ incidence equilibrates at a lower rate than pre-vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support adding a second varicella vaccine dose in Turkey, as doing so is highly cost-effective across a wide range of assumptions regarding the burden associated with varicella and HZ disease.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine , Chickenpox , Herpes Zoster , Herpesvirus 3, Human , Models, Biological , Models, Economic , Vaccination , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox/transmission , Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Herpes Zoster/economics , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Herpes Zoster/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster/transmission , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Turkey/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Norway does not implement routine vaccination against varicella or herpes zoster. Despite substantial health burden associated with both diseases, their economic impact is not well described. The aim of the present study was to document the healthcare costs associated with both conditions in a Norwegian setting. METHODS: We used registry data about patients' contacts with primary and specialized healthcare services from 2008 to 2014 to estimate the costs associated with varicella and herpes zoster in the primary and hospital care sector. We calculated the individual costs by treatment facility (general practitioner and emergency primary care clinic) in primary care and by treatment level (inpatient, outpatient or ambulatory treatment) at hospitals. RESULTS: We estimate that the annual healthcare cost of patients with varicella and herpes zoster are NOK 85 million (approximately 9 million). Of the annual costs, 73% are associated with herpes zoster and 27% are due to varicella. The majority (54%) of the total annual cost is represented by patients with herpes zoster treated in hospital. CONCLUSION: Varicella and herpes zoster impose a substantial financial burden on the national healthcare services in Norway. Most of the costs are incurred by herpes zoster, which could be prevented by vaccination.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Services/economics , Herpes Zoster/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Herpes Zoster/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
Objetivo: Describir las complicaciones más frecuentes y la carga económica asociada con la varicela en el Perú. Material y métodos: Estudio multicéntrico de revisión de historias clínicas de pacientes de 1 a 14 años con diagnóstico de varicela entre 2011 y 2016. El uso de recursos de atención médica (URAM) asociados con la varicela, los costos unitarios y la pérdida de trabajo se utilizaron para estimar los costos directos e indirectos, presentados en USD ($). Los datos de costos y URAM se combinaron con estimaciones de carga de enfermedad para calcular el costo total anual de la varicela en el Perú. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 179 niños con varicela (101 ambulatorios, 78 hospitalizados). Entre los pacientes ambulatorios, el 5,9 % presentó una o más complicaciones, en comparación con 96,2 % de pacientes hospitalizados. El URAM incluyó el uso de medicamentos de venta libre (72,3 % frente a 89,7 % de pacientes ambulatorios y hospitalizados, respectivamente), medicamentos con receta (30,7 % frente a 94,9 %) y análisis y procedimientos (0,0 % frente a 80,8 %). Los costos directos e indirectos por caso ambulatorio fueron $36 y $62 respectivamente y por caso hospitalizado fueron $548 y $222. El costo anual total asociado con la varicela se estimó en $13 907 146. Conclusión: La varicela está asociada con complicaciones clínicas importantes y elevado URAM en Perú, lo que respalda la necesidad de implementación de un plan de vacunación universal. (AU)
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic burden associated with varicella in Peru. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review study of patients aged 1-14 years with a varicella diagnosis between 2011 and 2016. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with varicella, unit costs, and work loss were used to estimate direct and indirect costs, presented in USD ($). The cost and HCRU data was combined with estimates of varicella disease burden to estimate the overall annual costs of management of varicella in Peru. Results: A total of 179 children with varicella (101 outpatients, 78 inpatients) were included. Among outpatients, 5.9% experienced â¥1 complication, compared with 96.2% of inpatients. HCRU estimates included use of over-the-counter (OTC) medications (72.3% vs. 89.7% of outpatient and inpatients, respectively), prescription medications (30.7% vs. 94.9%), tests/procedures (0.0% vs. 80.8%). Among outpatients, direct and indirect costs per case were $36 and $62, respectively; among inpatients, respective costs were $548 and $222. The total annual cost associated with varicella was estimated at $ 13 907 146. Conclusion: Varicella is associated with substantial clinical complications and high HCRU in Peru, supporting the need for implementation of a routine childhood varicella vaccination plan. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Peru , Chickenpox/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Expenditures , Immunization Programs , Costs and Cost Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Observational Studies as TopicABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Varicella is a highly contagious infection that can lead to serious complications, particularly in high-risk groups; however, it is vaccine preventable. Disease awareness and understanding of the disease burden can strongly influence vaccine coverage. This review provides insight into the current epidemiology and the importance of varicella from both public health and economic perspectives across the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region. Areas covered: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies on the incidence, seroprevalence, fatality rate and complication rate of varicella. Economic burden studies were also captured. Altogether, 125 studies were identified across the region; these were supplemented by government reports (gray data). Reported vaccine coverage varied from 2.8% to 97%; a key influencing factor was inclusion of the varicella vaccine in national immunization programs. In general, varicella incidence in the unvaccinated population was highest in children ≤5 years old and seroprevalence increased with age. Economic analyses highlighted the cost-saving potential of vaccination programs, especially from a societal perspective. Expert opinion: Varicella-related data varied greatly across the APAC region, highlighting the need to better understand the burden of varicella in this area, and particularly identified the need for better surveillance and reporting.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Asia/epidemiology , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/mortality , Humans , Incidence , Pacific Islands/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Vaccination against varicella rapidly reduces disease incidence, resulting in reductions in both individual burden and societal costs. Despite these benefits, there is no standardization of varicella immunization policies in Europe, including countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). AREAS COVERED: This systematic literature review identified publications on the epidemiology of varicella, its associated health and economic burden, and vaccination strategies within the CEE region, defined as Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Twenty-six studies were identified from a search of PubMed, Embase®, and MEDLINE® biomedical literature databases, supplemented by gray literature and country-specific/global websites. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Limited information exists in published studies on the burden of varicella in CEE. The wide variability in incidence rates between countries is likely explained by a lack of consistency in reporting systems. Funded universal varicella vaccination (UVV) in CEE is currently available only in Latvia as a one-dose schedule, but Hungary together with Latvia are introducing a two-dose strategy in 2019. For countries that do not provide UVV, introduction of vaccination is predicted to provide substantial reductions in cases and rates of associated complications, with important economic benefits.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Cost of Illness , Europe/epidemiology , Europe, Eastern/epidemiology , Health Policy , Humans , IncidenceABSTRACT
Varicella is a mild and self-limited illness in children, but can result in significant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). To quantify/contrast varicella-associated HCRU in five middle-income countries (Hungary, Poland, Argentina, Mexico, and Peru) where universal varicella vaccination was unimplemented, charts were retrospectively reviewed among 1-14 year-olds. Data were obtained on management of primary varicella between 2009-2016, including outpatient/inpatient visits, allied healthcare contacts, tests/procedures, and medications. These results are contrasted across countries, and a regression model is fit to extrapolated country-level costs as a function of gross domestic product (GDP). A total of 401 outpatients and 386 inpatients were included. Significant differences between countries were observed in the number of skin lesions among outpatients, ranging from 5.3% to 25.4% of patients with ≥250 lesions. Among inpatients, results were less variable. Average ambulatory medical visits ranged from 1.1 to 2.2. Average hospital stay ranged from 3.6 to 6.8 days. Use of tests/procedures was infrequent in outpatients, except in Argentina (13.3%); among inpatients, a test/procedure was ordered for 81.3% of patients, without regional variation. Prescription medications were administered in 44.4% of outpatients (range 9.3%-80.0%), and in 86% of inpatients (range 70.4%-94.9%). Total estimated spending on varicella treatment in the absence of vaccination was predicted from income levels (GDP) with an exponential function (R2 = 0.89). This study demonstrates that substantial HCRU is associated with varicella resulting in significant public health burden that could be alleviated through the use of varicella vaccination. Differences observed between countries possibly reflect treatment guidelines, healthcare resource availabilities and physician practices.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox/economics , Cost of Illness , Developing Countries/economics , Developing Countries/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/economics , Adolescent , Chickenpox/drug therapy , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe , Female , Health Resources , Humans , Infant , Latin America , Male , Outpatients , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Varicella zoster virus primarily causes chickenpox, usually a mild self-limiting illness of childhood. However, complications occur in 1% with 4200 annual deaths. Since the first vaccination was developed in the 1970s, many countries have introduced universal mass immunisation, but the UK currently only routinely immunises 'at-risk' populations. With increasing availability of private varicella vaccination, this article reviews the pros and cons of whether parents should be immunising their children with the chickenpox vaccine privately.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine , Mass Vaccination , Private Sector , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/immunology , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Making , Humans , Parents , United KingdomABSTRACT
Despite its benign characteristics, chickenpox is a childhood disease responsible for complications and deaths, particularly in the high-risk population. VariZIG®, not commercialized in France, is a good alternative for seronegative individuals exposed to the virus and not eligible for vaccination. The efficacy of routine vaccination has been demonstrated with a decrease in chickenpox incidence and with the development of herd immunity. Over time, the protective antibody titer of vaccinated people decreases and can be maintained by two doses of the vaccine. A tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-chickenpox vaccine, used in the United States, has a good tolerability in spite of the occurrence of fever and febrile seizures. Routine vaccination would contribute to make savings in France, by reducing direct and indirect costs of chickenpox.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox , Chickenpox/complications , Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox Vaccine/therapeutic use , Child , France/epidemiology , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/therapeutic use , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/methods , Vaccination/trends , Vaccines, Combined/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of live-attenuated varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccines in preventing varicella and reducing associated morbidity and mortality in real-world have been previously shown. In Poland, VZV vaccination is only mandatory for certain high-risk individuals. Here, we have conducted an evaluation of the clinical and economic burden of varicella in Poland. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective chart review of varicella inpatients and outpatients aged 1-12 years with a primary diagnosis between 2010 and 2015. Varicella-related outcomes included the incidence of complications, the proportion of patients reporting healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and frequency of HCRU. Direct costs were derived from per patient resource use multiplied by unit costs, and indirect costs were calculated as loss of revenue of caregivers reporting work days missed. The overall annual cost of varicella in Poland was estimated based on the calculated direct and indirect costs per case and the estimated number of varicella cases. All costs are presented in 2015 Polish zloty (PLN) / Euros (). RESULTS: A total of 150 children with varicella were included, of which 75 were outpatients and 75 were inpatients with a mean (± SD) age of 3.9 (±2.6) and 4.2 (±2.3) years, respectively. Complications were experienced by 14.7% of outpatients and 82.7% of inpatients, of which the most common were skin and soft tissue infections and dehydration. The rate of HCRU was as follows: over-the-counter medications (80.0% outpatients, 81.3% inpatients), prescription medications (80.0% outpatients, 93.3% inpatients), tests/procedures (0.0% outpatients, 69.3% inpatients), and allied health professional consults (0.0% outpatients, 24.0% inpatients). Total (direct and indirect) cost per varicella case was 5013.3 PLN ( 1198.1) for inpatients and 1027.2 PLN ( 245.5) for outpatients, resulting in an estimated overall annual (2015) cost of varicella in Poland of 178,198,320 PLN ( 42,588,385) among children aged 1-15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Significant clinical and economic burden is associated with varicella in Poland. These results may be used to foster discussion related to the implications of implementing routine VZV vaccination in Poland.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Poland/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Argentina, varicella vaccination was included in the national schedule for mandatory immunizations in 2015. The vaccine has been shown to substantially reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with the virus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic burden associated with varicella in Argentina prior to vaccine introduction. METHODS: This was a multi-center, retrospective chart review study among patients aged 1-12 years with a primary varicella diagnosis in 2009-2014 in Argentina. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with varicella and its complications, unit costs, and work loss were used to estimate direct and indirect costs. All costs are presented in 2015 United States dollars (USD). RESULTS: One hundred and fifty children with varicella were included (75 outpatients, 75 inpatients), with a mean age of 3.8 (SD = 2.4) and 2.9 (SD = 2.2) years, respectively. One or more complications were experienced by 28.0% of outpatients and 98.7% of inpatients, the most common being skin and soft tissue infections, pneumonia, sepsis, cerebellitis, and febrile seizure. HCRU estimates included use of over-the-counter (OTC) medications (58.7% outpatients, 94.7% inpatients), prescription medications (26.7% outpatients, 77.3% inpatients), tests/procedures (13.3% outpatients, 70.7% inpatients), and consultation with allied health professionals (1.3% outpatients, 32.0% inpatients). The average duration of hospital stay was 4.9 (95% CI = 4.2-5.7) days, and the average duration of ICU stay was 4.8 (95% CI = 1.6-14.1) days. The total combined direct and indirect cost per varicella case was 2947.7 USD (inpatients) and 322.7 USD (outpatients). The overall annual cost of varicella in Argentina for children aged ≤14 years in 2015 was estimated at 40,054,378.0 USD. CONCLUSION: The clinical burden of varicella in Argentina was associated with utilization of significant amounts of healthcare resources, resulting in substantial economic costs. These costs should be reduced with the recent implementation of routine vaccination of children.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Argentina/epidemiology , Chickenpox/complications , Chickenpox/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost of Illness , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Models, Econometric , Nonprescription Drugs/economics , Prescription Drugs/economics , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although live-attenuated varicella-zoster virus (VZV) vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective in preventing varicella and real-word evidence shows routine childhood immunization programs are effective in dramatically reducing varicella associated morbidity and mortality, varicella vaccine is not included in the National Immunization Program (NIP) in Hungary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic burden associated with varicella in Hungary. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, chart review study of patients aged 1-12 years with a primary varicella diagnosis between 2011 and 2015. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with varicella, unit costs, and work loss were used to estimate direct and indirect costs. All costs are presented in 2015 HUF / Euros (). RESULTS: 156 children with varicella were included (75 outpatients, 81 inpatients), with a mean age of 4.4 (SD: 2.0) and 3.7 (SD: 2.1) years, respectively. One or more complications were reported by 12.0% of outpatients and 92.6% of inpatients, the most common being dehydration, skin and soft tissue infections, pneumonia, keratoconjunctivitis, and cerebellitis. HCRU estimates included use of over-the-counter (OTC) medications (96.0% outpatients, 53.1% inpatients), prescription medications (9.3% outpatients, 70.4% inpatients), tests/procedures (4.0% outpatients, 97.5% inpatients), and consultation with allied health professionals (2.7% outpatients, 30.9% inpatients). The average duration of hospital stay (inpatients) was 3.6 (95% CI: 3.2, 4.1) days. The total combined direct and indirect cost per varicella case was 228,146.7 Hungarian Forint (HUF)/ 736.0 for inpatients and 49,790.6 HUF/ 106.6 for outpatients. The overall annual cost of varicella in Hungary for children aged <15 years in 2015 was estimated at 1,903,332,524.3 HUF/ 6,139,980.4. CONCLUSION: Varicella is associated with substantial clinical burden in Hungary, resulting in the utilization of a significant amount of healthcare resources. These results support the need for routine vaccination of all healthy children to reduce the varicella-associated disease burden.
Subject(s)
Chickenpox/economics , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox/therapy , Chickenpox Vaccine/economics , Chickenpox Vaccine/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Immunization Programs/economics , Infant , Inpatients , Length of Stay , Male , Morbidity , Outpatients , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Varicella is a highly infectious disease with a significant public health and economic burden, which can be prevented with childhood routine varicella vaccination. Vaccination strategies differ by country. Some factors are known to play an important role (number of doses, coverage, dosing interval, efficacy and catch-up programmes), however, their relative impact on the reduction of varicella in the population remains unclear. This paper aims to help policy makers prioritise the critical factors to achieve the most successful vaccination programme with the available budget. METHODS: Scenarios assessed the impact of different vaccination strategies on reduction of varicella disease in the population. A dynamic transmission model was used and adapted to fit Italian demographics and population mixing patterns. Inputs included coverage, number of doses, dosing intervals, first-dose efficacy and availability of catch-up programmes, based on strategies currently used or likely to be used in different countries. The time horizon was 30 years. RESULTS: Both one- and two-dose routine varicella vaccination strategies prevented a comparable number of varicella cases with complications, but two-doses provided broader protection due to prevention of a higher number of milder varicella cases. A catch-up programme in susceptible adolescents aged 10-14 years old reduced varicella cases by 27-43 % in older children, which are often more severe than in younger children. Coverage, for all strategies, sustained at high levels achieved the largest reduction in varicella. In general, a 20 % increase in coverage resulted in a further 27-31 % reduction in varicella cases. When high coverage is reached, the impact of dosing interval and first-dose vaccine efficacy had a relatively lower impact on disease prevention in the population. Compared to the long (11 years) dosing interval, the short (5 months) and medium (5 years) interval schedules reduced varicella cases by a further 5-13 % and 2-5 %, respectively. Similarly, a 10 % increase in first-dose efficacy (from 65 to 75 % efficacy) prevented 2-5 % more varicella cases, suggesting it is the least influential factor when considering routine varicella vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination strategies can be implemented differently in each country depending on their needs, infrastructure and healthcare budget. However, ensuring high coverage remains the critical success factor for significant prevention of varicella when introducing varicella vaccination in the national immunisation programme.