Optimising the indications for biliary stent placement during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a quality improvement initiative to enhance patient care and reduce healthcare resource utilisation.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective chart audit was performed to review biliary stent utilisation from January 2020 to January 2021. Non-guideline-based stent insertion was identified in 16% of patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones presenting for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). To improve this knowledge-practice gap, a quality improvement (QI) intervention was devised and trialled. AIM: To synchronise clinical indications for biliary stent insertion in patients with CBD stones in accordance with published guidelines. METHODS: Using a QI pre-post study design, chart audits were completed and shared with the ERCP team (n=6). Indication for biliary stent insertion was compared to published guidelines assessed by two reviewers independently (kappa statistic calculated). The QI intervention included an education session and quarterly practice audits. An interrupted time series with segmented regression was completed. RESULTS: A total of 661 patients (337 F), mean age 59±19 years (range 12-98 years), underwent 885 ERCPs during this postintervention period. Of 661 patients, 384 (58%) were referred for CBD stones. A total of 192 biliary stents (105 plastic, 85 metal) were placed during the first ERCP (192/661, 29%), as compared with the preintervention year (223/598, 37%, p=0.2). Furthermore, 13/192 stents (7%) were placed not in accordance with published guidelines (kappa=0.53), compared with 63/223 (28%) in the preintervention year (p<0.0001). A 75% reduction in overall avoidable stent placement was achieved with a direct cost avoidance of $C97 500. For the CBD stone subgroup, there was an 88% reduction in avoidable biliary stent placement compared with the preintervention year (8/384, 2% vs 61/375, 16%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Education with audit and feedback supported the closing of a knowledge-to-practice gap for biliary stent insertion during ERCP, especially in patients with CBD stones. This has resulted in a notable reduction of avoidable stent placements and additional follow-up ERCPs and an overall saving of healthcare resources.

Defining failure of endoluminal biliary drainage in the era of endoscopic ultrasound and lumen apposing metal stents.

The role of endoscopy in pathologies of the bile duct and gallbladder has seen notable advancements over the past two decades. With advancements in stent technology, such as the development of lumen-apposing metal stents, and adoption of endoscopic ultrasound and electrosurgical principles in therapeutic endoscopy, what was once considered endoscopic failure has transformed into failure of an approach that could be salvaged by a second- or third-line endoscopic strategy. Incorporation of these advancements in routine patient care will require formal training and multidisciplinary acceptance of established techniques and collaboration for advancement of experimental techniques to generate robust evidence that can be utilized to serve patients to the best of our ability.

CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH INTRAOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY: DOES THE ORDER MATTER?

BACKGROUND: The recommended treatment for cholecystocholedocholithiasis is cholecystectomy (CCT) associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). CCT with intraoperative ERCP is associated with higher success rates and lower hospital stays and hospital costs. However, some case series do not describe the exact methodology used: whether ERCP or CCT was performed first. AIMS: Verify if there is a difference, in terms of outcomes and complications, when intraoperative ERCP is performed immediately before or after CCT. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study analyzing all patients who underwent CCT with intraoperative ERCP between January 2021 and June 2022, in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil, for the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis. RESULTS: Out of 37 patients analyzed, 16 (43.2%) underwent ERCP first, immediately followed by CCT. The overall success rate for the cannulation of the bile duct was 91.9%, and bile duct clearance was achieved in 75.7% of cases. The post-ERCP pancreatitis rate was 10.8%. When comparing the "ERCP First" and "CCT First" groups, there was no difference in technical difficulty for performing CCT. The "CCT First" group had a higher rate of success in bile duct cannulation (p=0.020, p<0.05). Younger ages, presence of stones in the distal common bile duct and shorter duration of the procedure were factors statistically associated with the success of the bile duct clearance. Lymphopenia and cholecystitis as an initial presentation, in turn, were associated with failure to clear the bile duct. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in terms of complications and success in clearing the bile ducts among patients undergoing CCT and ERCP in the same surgical/anesthetic procedure, regardless of which procedure was performed first. Lymphopenia and cholecystitis have been associated with failure to clear the bile duct.

Digital cholangioscope assisted radiation-free bedside one-stage endoscopic lithotomy and biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis.

Radiation-free one-stage bedside endoscopic stone removal and biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis (SAC) caused by choledocholithiasis in intensive care unit (ICU) has not been reported. Herein, we introduce our preliminary experience of such intervention. Radiation-free bedside digital cholangioscope-assisted one-stage endoscopic stone removal and biliary drainage was performed in an urgent manner. Data on clinical outcomes and follow-up from thirty patients were retrospectively analyzed. Time interval was 7.6 ± 4.7 (2-18) h between ICU admission and endoscopic intervention, and was 35.5 ± 14.5 (5-48) h between the seizure and endoscopic intervention. A 100% technical success was achieved. Except for one mild pancreatitis, no other complication occurred. Patients showed good responses to endoscopic interventions, which were reflected by ameliorated disease severities and laboratory findings. Time lengths of ICU stay and total in-hospital stay were 8.7 ± 4.9 (2-23) days and 14.5 ± 7.4 (5-39) days, respectively. In-hospital mortality occurred in three patients. According to a 6-month follow-up, two patients died of pneumonia and acute myocardial infarction. No SAC and/or biliary stone residual occurred. The current intervention demonstrated favorable results compared to traditional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Our study provides a novel bedside endoscopic intervention method for SAC caused by choledocholithiasis.

Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Gallstone Pancreatitis Is Safe: Results From a Large Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: There is concern that performing early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the setting of gallstone pancreatitis (GSP) with choledocholithiasis can worsen underlying pancreatitis. This study was designed to assess outcomes of early versus delayed ERCP in patients with GSP with choledocholithiasis in the absence of cholangitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, we identified 124 patients who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis in the setting of GSP without cholangitis between 2012 and 2022. Timing of ERCP was categorized as early (<48 hours after time of diagnosis) versus delayed (>48 hours). Data on patient demographics, complications, length of stay (LOS), and mortality were collected. RESULTS: Cannulation success rates were similar for early and delayed ERCP (97% vs 100%). The adverse event rate for early ERCP was 15% compared to 29% for delayed ERCP. LOS for patients with predicted mild pancreatitis was shorter for early versus delayed ERCP (4.2 vs 7.1 days, P = 0.007). There were no deaths in either group. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend toward fewer adverse events and there was a shorter LOS among patients with GSP with choledocholithiasis undergoing early versus delayed ERCP. Early ERCP should be considered, particularly in patients with predicted mild pancreatitis.

[Endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous procedure for the management of difficult biliary tract: experience in an endoscopic center in Lima-Peru]. / Procedimiento endoscópico-percutáneo de rendezvous para el manejo de vía biliar difícil: experiencia en un centro endoscópico de Lima-Perú.

OBJECTIVES: Biliary access refractory to conventional cannulation techniques is a challenging clinical scenario for most endoscopists. The endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous technique is an optimal alternative with high success rates and low complication rates in expert hands, however its routine use in the West, mainly in Latin America, is still limited. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous in the management of difficult biliary tract in an endoscopic center in Peru. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive study - case series type that included 21 patients, with diagnosis of difficult bile duct, all treated by endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous between July 2017 to July 2020. We evaluated: age, gender, number of previous failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, associated endoscopic findings, rate of successful cannulation, rate of successful resolution of difficult choledocholithiasis, adverse events and procedure-related mortality. RESULTS: The rate of successful cannulation was 100% (21/21). There were 12 cases (57.1%) of difficult choledocholithiasis of which there was a successful resolution rate of 91.6% (11/12). The overall adverse event rate was 4.7% (1/21), which was one case of post-sphincteroplasty gastrointestinal bleeding that was successfully resolved endoscopically only. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous performed by expert hands is feasible, safe and clinically effective for the management of the difficult bile duct in Latin America.

ERCP-Related adverse events in pediatric patients: a 10-years single-site review.

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pediatric patients by examining ERCP-related adverse events (AEs) occurring over a decade at a single center. METHODS: Pediatric patients under 18 years old who underwent ERCP at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 1/2013 to 11/2023 were included. ERCP-related AEs were defined according to ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Clinical data of patients experiencing ERCP-related AEs were obtained from electronic medical records for analysis. RESULTS: Over the past decade, a total of 76 pediatric patients underwent 113 ERCP procedures, including 26 patients who underwent repeat ERCP, totaling 63 procedures. There were 32 males and 44 females, with a median age of 13 years (range 3 years and 5 months-17 years and 9 months). Among all ERCP procedures, 14 (12.4%) were diagnostic and 99 (87.6%) were therapeutic, with a 100% success rate. 16 cases (14.2%) of ERCP-related AEs, all post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), were observed, while no other AEs defined by ESGE such as bleeding, perforation, cholangitis, cholecystitis, or sedation-related events were noted. Additionally, 23 cases (20.4%) of ERCP-related AEs not included in the ESGE definition were observed, including post-ERCP abdominal pain in 20 cases (17.7%), post-ERCP nausea and vomiting in 2 cases (1.8%), and unplanned reoperation in 1 case (0.9%). In the 26 cases of pediatric patients who underwent repeat ERCP, we observed that AEs occurred in 15 cases (57.7%) during their initial ERCP, which was much higher than the overall average level. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ERCP abdominal pain and PEP are the most common ERCP-related AEs in pediatric patients, while severe AEs such as bleeding and perforation are rare. The incidence of AEs after initial ERCP in pediatric patients who received repeat ERCP is higher than the overall average level. Based on our center's experience, we believe that ERCP can be safely performed in children over 3 years old with biliary and pancreatic diseases and obtain reliable clinical benefits. However, active monitoring and management of ERCP-related AEs are essential to improve the clinical outcomes of pediatric ERCP.

Trend in predictive factors of choledocholithiasis: the key to the management of pediatric patients with suspected gallstones. / Tendencia en los factores predictivos de coledocolitiasis: la clave para el manejo de pacientes pediátricos con sospecha de cálculos en la vía biliar.

OBJECTIVES: To reduce the overuse of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and the rates of non-therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pediatric patients suspected of choledocholithiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients suspected of choledocholithiasis between January 2010 and June 2023. Patients with cholangitis or two or more of the following predictive factors of choledocholithiasis in initial laboratory tests and ultrasound were categorized as high-risk group: total bilirubin level ≥ 2 mg/dl, common bile duct > 6 millimeters on ultrasound; and detection of choledocholithiasis by ultrasound. Patients were recategorized according to the results of the second set of laboratory and ultrasound analysis. Confirmatory modalities (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and/or intraoperative cholangiography) were used to evaluate the presence of choledocholithiasis. Finally, we assessed the predictive capability of both the initial high-risk group and the group after recategorization. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients were included. After initial studies, 72 (55.8%) patients were classified into the high-risk group. After recategorization, only 29 (22.5%) patients were included in this group. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the initial high-risk group were 89.3%, 53.5%, 34.7%, 94.7%, and 61.2%, respectively, while after recategorization, they were 82.1%, 94.1%, 79.3%, 95.0%, and 91.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Recategorization of the risk of choledocholithiasis would significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of choledocholithiasis and help reduce the overuse of more complex and unnecessary studies/procedures.

OBJETIVOS: Disminuir la sobre indicación de la colangiorresonancia y las tasas de colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica o terapéuticas en pacientes pediátricos con sospecha de coledocolitiasis. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes con sospecha de coledocolitiasis entre enero de 2010 y junio de 2023. Los pacientes con colangitis o dos o más de los siguientes factores predictivos de coledocolitiasis en las pruebas de laboratorio y ecografía iniciales, se categorizaron como grupo de alto riesgo: nivel de bilirrubina total ≥ 2 mg/dl, colédoco > 6 milímetros en ecografía; y la detección de coledocolitiasis por ecografía. Los pacientes fueron recategorizados de acuerdo a los resultados del segundo conjunto de análisis de laboratorio y ecografía. Para evaluar la presencia de coledocolitiasis se utilizaron modalidades confirmatorias (colangiorresonancia, colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica y/o colangiografía intraoperatoria). Finalmente, evaluamos la capacidad predictiva tanto del grupo de alto riesgo inicial como del grupo después de la recategorización. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 129 pacientes. Luego de los estudios iniciales, 72 (55,8%) pacientes se clasificaron en el grupo de alto riesgo. Luego de la recategorización, solo 29 (22,5%) pacientes fueron incluidos dentro de este grupo. La sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo, valor predictivo negativo y precisión diagnóstica del grupo de alto riesgo inicial fueron de 89,3%, 53,5%, 34,7%, 94,7% y 61,2%, mientras que luego de la recategorización fueron de 82,1%, 94,1%, 79,3%, 95,0% y 91,5%, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: La recategorización del riesgo de coledocolitiasis, mejoraría significativamente la precisión diagnóstica de coledocolitiasis y ayudaría a disminuir la sobre indicación de estudios/procedimientos complejos e innecesarios.

Do pre-operative endoscopic procedures, impact the surgical outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy?

The role and risks of pre-operative endoscopic procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS/FNA), in patients undergoing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy are not well-defined despite a broad consensus on the utility of these interventions for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes prior to major pancreatic operations. This study investigates the impact of such preoperative endoscopic interventions on perioperative outcomes in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval we retrospectively analyzed 772 patients who underwent robotic pancreatectomies between 2012 and 2023. Specifically, 430 of these patients underwent a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy were prospectively evaluated: 93 (22%) patients underwent ERCP with EUS and FNA, 45 (10%) ERCP only, and 31 (7%) EUS and FNA, while 261 (61%) did not. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests and Student's t-tests to compare perioperative outcomes between the two cohorts. Statistically significant differences were observed in patients who underwent a pre-operative endoscopic intervention and were more likely to have converted to an open operation (p = 0.04). The average number of harvested lymph nodes for patients who underwent preoperative endoscopic intervention was statistically significant compared to those who did not (p = 0.0001). All other perioperative variables were consistent across all cohorts. Patients who underwent endoscopic intervention before robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy were more likely to have an unplanned open operation. This study demonstrates the increased operative difficulties introduced by preoperative endoscopic interventions. Although there was no impact on overall patient outcomes, surgeons' experience can minimize the associated risks.