Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 331
Filter
1.
Exp Dermatol ; 33(8): e15168, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39175304

ABSTRACT

In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effectiveness of adding antiplatelet drugs to up-dosing antihistamines for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in patients with elevated D-dimer levels who had an inadequate response to conventional antihistamine doses. Twenty patients with Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) ≥16 and D-dimer >500 ng/mL were randomized to receive either antiplatelet therapy (cilostazol 150 mg/day + dipyridamole 50 mg/day) with antihistamine (desloratadine 20 mg/day) or antihistamine alone for 4 weeks. The antiplatelet group demonstrated a greater decrease in UAS7 compared to the control group (28.10 to 8.90 vs. 22.90 to 16.40, p < 0.001 vs. p = 0.054). Both groups experienced improved quality of life (DLQI), but the improvement was greater in the antiplatelet group (p = 0.046). D-dimer levels decreased only in the antiplatelet group (1133.67 ng/mL to 581.89 ng/mL, p = 0.013) with no significant change observed in the control group. This suggests that combining dipyridamole and cilostazol with up-dosing antihistamines may be more effective for CSU patients with high D-dimer levels compared to up-dosing antihistamines alone. This could be due to a reduction in platelet activation, as evidenced by the decrease in D-dimer levels observed in the antiplatelet group.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Cilostazol , Dipyridamole , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products , Loratadine , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Humans , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Dipyridamole/administration & dosage , Dipyridamole/therapeutic use , Loratadine/administration & dosage , Loratadine/therapeutic use , Loratadine/analogs & derivatives , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Cilostazol/administration & dosage , Cilostazol/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Histamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Tetrazoles/administration & dosage , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use
2.
Lancet ; 404(10450): 393-404, 2024 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004090

ABSTRACT

Chronic urticaria is a common and debilitating mast cell-driven skin disease presenting with itchy wheals, angio-oedema, or both. Chronic urticaria is classified as spontaneous (without definite triggers) and inducible (with definite and subtype-specific triggers; eg, cold or pressure). Current management guidelines recommend step-up administration of second-generation H1-antihistamines to four-fold the approved dose, followed by omalizumab and ciclosporin. However, in many patients, chronic urticaria does not respond to this linear approach due to heterogeneous underlying mechanisms. A personalised endotype-based approach is emerging based on the identification of autoantibodies and other drivers of urticaria pathogenesis. Over the past decade, clinical trials have presented promising options for targeted treatment of chronic urticaria with the potential for disease modification, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-cytokine therapies, and mast cell depletion. This Therapeutics article focuses on the evidence for these novel drugs and their role in addressing an unmet need for personalised management of patients with chronic urticaria.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Precision Medicine , Humans , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Mast Cells/immunology , Mast Cells/drug effects , Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase/antagonists & inhibitors
3.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 24(8): 457-469, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028396

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) is a group of long-persisting and challenging to manage diseases, characterized by recurrent wheals and angioedema induced by definite triggers. In this review, we address recent findings on CIndU pathogenesis, diagnosis as well as its treatment, and we discuss novel potential targets that may lead to the development of more effective therapies for CIndU patients. RECENT ADVANCES: Meaningful advances in the understanding of its pathogenesis have been reported in the last decades. Novel CIndU-specific patient-reported outcome measures enable a closer and better evaluation of patients. CIndU is a hard-to-treat disease that highly impairs quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. Provocation tests allow to diagnose CIndU subtypes. The only licensed and recommended treatment for CIndU are second generation non-sedating H1-antihistamines, which lack efficacy in many cases. Omalizumab off-label use has been assessed in all types of CIndU with overall good outcomes. Promising emerging therapies currently assessed in chronic spontaneous urticaria are paving the path for novel treatments for CIndU.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Omalizumab , Humans , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Chronic Urticaria/immunology , Chronic Urticaria/therapy , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Urticaria/drug therapy , Urticaria/etiology , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/immunology , Urticaria/therapy
4.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(4): 255-261, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982597

ABSTRACT

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common disease with complex pathogenesis. Patients' clinical characteristics and responses to treatment vary. Objective: We aimed to investigate the role of data obtained from routinely recommended tests in predicting the response to omalizumab, the only biologic agent approved for treatment, and in defining the clinical characteristics of the patients. Methods: A retrospective study of patients who started omalizumab treatment for CSU between 2015 and 2022 at the Department of Dermatology, Pamukkale University, was conducted. Response criteria were based on the urticaria control test, and patients with a urticaria control test score <12 at 6 months were considered treatment non-responders. Eosinophil and basophil counts, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels of the patients were evaluated before treatment and at the sixth month of treatment. Results: A total of 23.1% of the patients were unresponsive to omalizumab. The response rate to the omalizumab treatment of the patients with a total IgE level ≤ 30 IU/L (n = 4 [5.7%]) was significantly lower than patients with total IgE level > 30 IU/L (n = 66 [94.3%]) (p = 0.015). The mean ± standard deviation SIRI levels were significantly higher in non-responders versus responders (1.53 ± 1.03 versus 1.15 ± 7.76; p = 0.026). Eosinophil counts positively correlated with basophil counts (r = 587; p < 0.001) and IgE levels (r = 0.290; p = 0.005) but a negative correlation was found with levels of NLR (r = -0.475; p < 0.001), SIRI (r = -0.259; p = 0.013), and SII (r = -0.285; p = 0.006). NLR levels were lower in CSU patients with atopy, than in those without atopy (1.9 ± 0.9 vs 2.9 ± 2.1, p = 0.022). Conclusion: We suggest that eosinopenia and high NLR levels are linked to autoimmune CSU. Predicting a poor response to omalizumab seems possible with total IgE levels < 30 IU/L and high SIRI levels.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents , Chronic Urticaria , Immunoglobulin E , Omalizumab , Humans , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Treatment Outcome , Eosinophils/immunology , Leukocyte Count , Aged , Young Adult
5.
Gut Microbes ; 16(1): 2382774, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078229

ABSTRACT

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a prevalent skin disorder greatly impacting the patients' life quality, in which immune dysregulation mediated by gut microbiome plays a significant role. Several studies have found the gut dysbiosis exists in patients with CU. In addition, infection may also be one of the causes of CU. The primary treatment currently used for CU is the second-generation non-sedating H1-antihistamines (nsAH). However, there are some limitations in current therapies. Based on the latest evidence, this review provides an updated overview of how the gut dysbiosis influences CU development, explores potential therapeutic approaches based on the gut microbiota and summarizes the interaction between gut microbiota and current treatment.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Dysbiosis , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Humans , Chronic Urticaria/microbiology , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Dysbiosis/microbiology , Animals , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Bacteria/classification
6.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 44(3): 503-515, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937012

ABSTRACT

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) affects 0.5% to 1% of the general population and is often managed by allergy and immunology specialists. Guidelines have evolved over the past several decades with an emphasis on decreasing extensive screening laboratory testing as they are of low-yield and cost-ineffective. The utility of biomarkers remains under investigation but total immunoglobulin E may be helpful in determining specific endotypes and response to omalizumab. Antihistamines and omalizumab remain the primary therapeutic options for CSU, but an expanding body of evidence supports the use of immunosuppressants and anti-inflammatory medications in refractory cases.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Humans , Chronic Urticaria/diagnosis , Chronic Urticaria/therapy , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Disease Management , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
7.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am ; 44(3): 517-528, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937013

ABSTRACT

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common and long-lasting mast cell-mediated skin disease associated with psychiatric and autoimmune comorbidities, high economic costs, and considerable impact on quality of life. Available therapies show limited efficacy in many CU patients, which may be related to distinct underlying pathophysiology. Targeted and disease-modifying treatments with higher and broader efficacy are needed and are under development for CU. These novel drugs, small molecules, and monoclonal antibodies target mast cells and their receptors, signaling pathways, or mediators and other immune cells. In this article, the authors focus on the most promising emerging therapeutics in advanced development and discuss their potential place in future management of CU.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Mast Cells , Humans , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Chronic Urticaria/therapy , Chronic Urticaria/diagnosis , Mast Cells/immunology , Mast Cells/metabolism , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Animals , Disease Management , Quality of Life
8.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv24050, 2024 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932592

ABSTRACT

To examine the prevalence of comorbidities in Chinese urticaria patients and assess medication use patterns across different ages (6-11 years, 12-17 years, above 18 years), a retrospective cohort study was performed in 192,647 urticaria patients within the Health Database. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 166,921 people were divided into the urticaria group and the control group, and the follow-up data were collected within 2 years. During the 12-month and 24-month follow-up period, significant comorbidities identified included allergic rhinitis and asthma, with distinct patterns observed across age groups. Chronic urticaria patients often have complications, such as allergic rhinitis, upper respiratory infection, oropharyngeal infection, and dental caries. The study underscores the need for age-specific treatment strategies in urticaria management.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Comorbidity , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Child , Male , Adolescent , Female , China/epidemiology , Prevalence , Age Factors , Young Adult , Chronic Urticaria/epidemiology , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Adult , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Time Factors , Urticaria/epidemiology , Urticaria/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Propensity Score , Middle Aged , Databases, Factual , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/diagnosis , East Asian People
10.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 30(5): 53-57, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819189

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Urticaria is a dermatological disorder that manifests as raised erythematous lesions with pruritis and resolves with no changes to the appearance of the skin. In Ayurveda, this condition is similar to "Sheetapitta," which involves an imbalance of Doshas (regulatory functional factors of the body) and is treated through purification techniques like Panchakarma. Recognizing the significance of such treatments, this case explores the effectiveness of Ayurveda purificatory therapies, specifically Shodhana, in managing chronic urticaria. Main Clinical Findings and Diagnosis: A 38-year-old female patient presented with a one-year history of reddish raised skin rashes with intense itching and, swelling all over the body, which did not get subsided by the use of anti-histamines. Initial medical evaluations included a complete blood count and serum IgE levels, which supported the diagnosis of chronic urticaria. Interventions: The patient was admitted to the Panchakarma In-Patient department for a course of Ayurveda purificatory therapies called Panchakarma, which included procedures such as Vamana (therapeutic vomiting), and Virechana (medicated purging). These therapies were tailored to the patient's constitutional needs and the severity of the symptoms. Outcomes: Post-treatment assessments showed significant improvement, evidenced by reductions in the Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) from 42 to 8, and a decrease in serum IgE levels from 469 IU/ml to 32.9 IU/ml. These findings demonstrate the impact of the treatment on both subjective and objective parameters. Conclusion: The case effectively demonstrates that Shodhana (purificatory procedures), along with supportive Shamana (internal medication), provides an alternative to manage chronic spontaneous urticaria, particularly in cases unresponsive to conventional therapies. This approach not only alleviates symptoms but also addresses the root cause of the ailment as understood in Ayurvedic practice, suggesting a promising area for further research and clinical application.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Medicine, Ayurvedic , Humans , Female , Adult , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Chronic Urticaria/therapy
12.
Neuromuscul Disord ; 40: 7-15, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38805897

ABSTRACT

Anti-Ku autoantibodies are associated with several autoimmune inflammatory diseases. We aimed to review our anti-Ku positive pediatric patients in this study. Four pediatric patients (all female) who had anti-Ku positivity were included (Patients 1-2-3 with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM); Patient 4 with chronic urticaria). Patient 1 (onset:10.5 years) had proximal muscle weakness, Raynaud phenomenon, sclerodactyly, hyperpigmentation, joint contracture, and tenosynovitis. The disease course was progressive despite treatment with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasma exchange, and 11 different immunosuppressive drugs. Patient 2 (onset:15 years) presented with proximal muscle weakness, fatigue, weight loss. She recovered normal muscle strength after treatment with corticosteroids, IVIG, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil. Patient 3 (onset:10 years) had juvenile dermatomyositis with proximal muscle weakness, Gottron's papules, and calcinosis. She also had anti-NXP2 positivity. Remission was achieved with corticosteroids, methotrexate, azathioprine, and infliximab. Muscle biopsy findings revealed a variable spectrum of necrosis, regeneration, perifascicular pattern, and inflammation. Patient 4 had only chronic urticaria (onset: 6.5 years). The striking features of this series were heterogeneity in clinical presentations including solely chronic urticaria and IIM; variable response to immunosuppressive treatments; and histopathology revealing a spectrum of necrosis, regeneration and inflammatory infiltration. Expanding the spectrum of anti-Ku positivity will allow better understanding of anti-Ku-associated phenotype clusters.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Ku Autoantigen , Phenotype , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Child , Ku Autoantigen/immunology , Autoantibodies/blood , Myositis/immunology , Myositis/drug therapy , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Chronic Urticaria/immunology
13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741391

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the remission probability and duration in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients resistant to second-generation H1-antihistamines (sgAHs) undergoing omalizumab treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of 176 adult CSU patients exhibiting a significant pruritus component (≥ 8) of the weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7) despite four daily sgAH tablets and starting omalizumab treatment with 300 mg every 4 weeks. After excluding 13 nonresponders, we analyzed 163 omalizumab responders (mean age 51.8 years, 74.4% female). The intervals between applications were increased. Discontinuation was considered for patients that remained asymptomatic on a gradually reduced dosage (to 150 mg every 12 weeks) without sgAHs. RESULTS: Omalizumab discontinuation was possible in 25.8% (42/163). The duration of omalizumab treatment before remission ranged from 7 to 63 months. Twenty-one patients (50.0%) maintained complete remission until the end of the observation period (September 2021) for 8 to 68 months. Of the relapsed patients, 71.4% (15/21) effectively controlled CSU with sgAHs. Six patients (28.6%; 6/21) required omalizumab reintroduction after 6 to 40 months of remission, responding favorably. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that a quarter of severe CSU patients achieve long-term remission. In addition, sgAHs effectively manage symptoms in a majority of relapsed cases, and those requiring omalizumab reintroduction respond favorably.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents , Chronic Urticaria , Omalizumab , Humans , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Adult , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Remission Induction , Treatment Outcome , Aged
14.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 261, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795119

ABSTRACT

While several studies have examined the role of T cells and related cytokines in the development of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), there is a limited amount of research focusing on the changes in cytokine levels during omalizumab treatment. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the inflammatory cytokine profile (including IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-17, IL-31, IL-33, and TNFα) among CSU patients undergoing to omalizumab treatment. Plasma levels of cytokines were measured using ELISA. Measurements were taken before CSU treatment, at the 3rd and 6th months of omalizumab treatment, and once in the control group. The severity of the patients' disease was assessed using the weekly Urticaria Activity Score(UAS7), and disease control was evaluated using the Urticaria Control Test(UCT). Thirty-one CSU patients and 56 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included. Plasma levels of IL-4 and IL-33 were significantly lower in patients with CSU compared to healthy controls (p = 0.001; p = 0.038, respectively). During omalizumab treatment, IL-4 levels showed a significant increase in the 3rd month compared to baseline (p = 0.01), and IL-5 levels significantly decreased in the 6th month compared to both the 3rd month and baseline (6th month vs. baseline; p = 0.006, 6th month vs. 3rd month; p = 0.001). One potential mechanism of action for omalizumab may involve its regulatory effects on type 2 inflammatory cytokines in CSU patients. This finding partially explains the efficacy of anti-IL-4/13 treatments in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Further investigations on drugs targeting type 2 inflammatory cytokines in CSU are warranted.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents , Chronic Urticaria , Cytokines , Omalizumab , Humans , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Omalizumab/administration & dosage , Female , Male , Adult , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Chronic Urticaria/blood , Chronic Urticaria/immunology , Middle Aged , Cytokines/blood , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Case-Control Studies , Young Adult
15.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(5)2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792886

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: The guidelines for chronic urticaria in children contain recommendations that are often based on adult studies. The diagnostic pathway has not been standardized and the effectiveness of anti-H1, omalizumab, montelukast, and systemic glucocorticoids is rarely reported in the pediatric population. There is a wide variation in the rate of remission of chronic urticaria between studies. The aim of this study is to enhance our understanding of pediatric chronic urticaria. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 37 children with chronic urticaria aged from 0 to 18 years. Demographic parameters, medical history, clinical features, laboratory data and treatment information were collected. Children were treated with the recommended dosage of second-generation H1-antihistamines, which was increased by up to twofold. Omalizumab was added for refractory anti-H1 patients. A three-day course with systemic glucocorticoids was administered for severe exacerbations. Montelukast was administered to some children. Results: Wheals without angioedema were common. Chronic urticaria was spontaneous in 32 children (86.48%), inducible in 2 (5.41%), induced by a parasite in 1 and vasculitic in 2. Treatment of the potential causes of chronic urticaria was of no benefit, except for eradication of Dientamoeba fragilis. Chronic urticaria was resolved within three years in 45.9% of cases. Allergic diseases were present in nine children (24.32%) and autoimmune diseases were present in three (8.11%). All children were treated with anti-H1 at the licensed dose or at a higher dose. A partial or complete response to anti-H1 was observed in 29 (78.38%) patients. Montelukast showed no benefit. All children treated with omalizumab responded. Systemic glucocorticoids were successfully used to treat exacerbations. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that laboratory tests should not be routinely performed in children with chronic urticaria without clinical suspicion. However, comorbidities such as thyroid autoimmune disease and coeliac disease are suggested to be monitored over the chronic urticaria course. These clinical conditions could be diagnosed from the diagnostic framework of chronic urticaria. Increasing the dosage of anti-H1 and omalizumab was effective in children resistant to standard treatment but we still need further studies to generate a standard patient-centered treatment.


Subject(s)
Acetates , Chronic Urticaria , Cyclopropanes , Omalizumab , Quinolines , Sulfides , Humans , Child , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Infant , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Quinolines/administration & dosage , Acetates/therapeutic use , Acetates/administration & dosage , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Infant, Newborn , Chronic Disease , Urticaria/drug therapy
16.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(8): 2166-2172, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761861

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) management often follows chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) guidelines, but a step-by-step evaluation of their effectiveness in CIndU is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical impact of adapting CSU international guidelines for CIndU management. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients diagnosed with CIndU based on challenge tests and a Urticaria Control Test (UCT) score of ≤11 points. Following the guidelines, a stepwise approach was used: avoidance measures, antihistamines, omalizumab, and cyclosporine. Treatment steps were added based on individual response, with control defined as UCT ≥12 points. Pharmacological steps were evaluated for at least 1 month, with the next step initiated in case of a UCT score ≤11 points. RESULTS: We enrolled 194 patients with CIndU. Of them, 134 patients had CIndU with concomitant CSU and 60 had CIndU only. Following the step-by-step approach outlined in the guidelines, a total of 159 (81.9%) patients reach a UCT ≥12 points, with avoidance measures 23 (11.8%) patients, antihistamines 84 (43.2%), omalizumab 35 (18%), and cyclosporine 17 (8.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of a stepwise approach based on CSU guidelines for CIndU management. However, a significant proportion of patients, particularly those with CIndU only, did not achieve adequate control. This highlights the heterogeneity within CIndU and the need for further research to develop new therapies for patients with CIndU who remain uncontrolled.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents , Chronic Urticaria , Cyclosporine , Histamine Antagonists , Omalizumab , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Urticaria/drug therapy
18.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 1-7, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721949

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Many chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients have highly stressful life events and exhibit psychiatric comorbidities. Emotional stress can cause or exacerbate urticaria symptoms by causing mast cell degranulation via neuromediators. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of stressful life events and compare psychiatric comorbidities and serum neuromediator levels in patients with CSU who responded to omalizumab with healthy controls. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included 42 patients with CSU who received at least 6 months of omalizumab treatment and a control group of 42 healthy controls. Stressful life events were evaluated with the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-42 (DASS-42) was used to evaluate depression, anxiety and stress levels. Serum nerve growth factor (NGF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) levels were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. RESULTS: Twenty-six (62%) patients reported at least one stressful life event a median of 3.5 months before the onset of CSU. There were no significant differences in all three variables in the DASS subscales between the patient and control groups. Serum NGF levels were found to be significantly lower in patients with CSU (p <0.001), whereas CGRP levels were found to be significantly higher (p <0.001). There was no significant difference for SP. CONCLUSIONS: The psychological status of patients with CSU who benefited from omalizumab was similar to that of healthy controls. Omalizumab may affect stress-related neuromediator levels.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents , Chronic Urticaria , Nerve Growth Factor , Omalizumab , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Adult , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Chronic Urticaria/blood , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/drug therapy , Stress, Psychological/blood , Nerve Growth Factor/blood , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Substance P/blood , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide , Comorbidity , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/blood , Depression/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/blood , Mental Disorders/epidemiology
19.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 24(5): 383-388, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733124

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) poses significant challenges, especially in pediatric and adolescent patients, impacting physical, emotional, and social well-being. Recent biologic breakthroughs offer promise, however, data on safety and efficacy in this population remain limited. AREAS COVERED: This review examines current biologic treatments in pediatrics and adolescents with CSU and explores the rapidly emerging landscape. EXPERT OPINION: Despite omalizumab's approval for allergic asthma in children since 2009, its delayed approval for CSU raises questions. Ligelizumab, a next-generation anti-IgE mAb, showed effectiveness in adults but lacks pediatric studies. CT-P39, a biosimilar to omalizumab, demonstrates promise, yet adolescent-specific outcomes are undisclosed. Dupilumab's recent approval for atopic dermatitis in children from 6 months onwards signifies progress. Expert opinion underscores the scarcity of controlled trials in pediatric and adolescent CSU, emphasizing the need for comprehensive studies. Age-specific data and collaboration are crucial for addressing research gaps and expanding indications for pediatric CSU treatment. The recently validated UAS7 parameter in children marks a milestone for prospective clinical trials. Despite challenges, the biology therapy outlook for pediatric and adolescent CSU is promising. Importantly, studies indicate that pediatric CSU is at least as prevalent as in adults, highlighting the need for approved treatments in this population.


Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Chronic Urticaria/immunology , Biological Therapy/trends , Biological Therapy/methods , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Biological Products/adverse effects
20.
Skin Res Technol ; 30(5): e13749, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab is the only licensed drug that serves as a third-line treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). The optimum doses of omalizumab remain controversial. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the efficacy and safety of different doses of omalizumab in the treatment of CIU patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four databases were searched from the database's creation to April 8, 2023. Several keywords such as omalizumab and urticarias were used to retrieve related studies. The meta-analytical outcomes were analyzed in R 4.2.1 software and Stata 15.1 software. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool Ver. 2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: In total, 2331 patients were included. Five indexes were employed to assess, including weekly Itch Severity Score (ISS7), weekly Hive Severity Score (HSS7), weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and adverse events (AE). A 300 mg dose of omalizumab was the optimum dose to treat CIU, followed by the 150 mg dose. Furthermore, 600 mg of omalizumab only showed a significant difference from the placebo in HSS7. No significant statistical difference was observed in AE. Meta-regression analysis revealed that time, as a covariate, was statistically significant in the comparison of omalizumab 150 mg with placebo. CONCLUSION: 300 mg of omalizumab was the optimum dosage to treat CIU patients, with a 150 mg dose also exhibiting good efficacy. Further studies are required to explore the efficacy and safety of different doses of omalizumab in the treatment of CIU patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents , Chronic Urticaria , Omalizumab , Omalizumab/adverse effects , Omalizumab/administration & dosage , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Humans , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Allergic Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Quality of Life , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL