AUDCRED: ferramenta de apoio para auditoria de contas em saúde / AUDCRED: support tool for auditing health accounts

Introdução: Uma das ferramentas de qualidade mais eficientes para monitorar um sistema de gestão é a auditoria, pois, quando bem aplicada, diagnostica não conformidades no serviço avaliado, sendo executada por profissionais capacitados que apresentam, além do conhecimento técnico-científico, atributos pessoais como imparcialidade, prudência e diplomacia. Objetivos: O objetivo geral do estudo foi desenvolver uma ferramenta móvel que possa servir de apoio para o processo de auditoria de contas médicas e os objetivos específicos foram: identificar os requisitos necessários para o desenvolvimento da ferramenta de auditoria; apresentar um protótipo e desenvolver uma ferramenta garantindo os requisitos de segurança necessários à manutenção da informação pessoal, possibilitando sua implementação, distribuição e modificação e avaliar o impacto da ferramenta para a auditoria em saúde no âmbito da Marinha do Brasil. Método: Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, exploratório, de abordagem qualitativa, aplicado à produção tecnológica e destinado a desenvolver uma ferramenta informatizada móvel para apoio ao serviço de auditoria de contas médicas. Para desenvolvimento da ferramenta foi utilizada a metodologia de Pressman, seguindo as seguintes etapas: coleta e refinamento dos requisitos, elaboração de projeto rápido, construção do protótipo, avaliação pelo cliente e posterior refinamento quando há necessidade de ajustes finais do projeto, com o intuito de satisfazer da melhor forma as necessidades dos clientes. Resultados: Foram distribuídos 75 formulários para os auditores da Marinha e, tendo sido respondidos 65 (84,3%), observou-se que 40,9% dos entrevistados eram enfermeiros e 29% não tinham experiência em auditoria. As falas dos entrevistados foram analisadas, emergindo cinco categorias relacionadas a melhorias e uma a crítica, sendo estas respectivamente: ampliar o módulo para controle e previsão de custos; regular os serviços que serão prestados pela contratada; orientar profissionais a executarem a auditoria em saúde; ampliar módulo para que possam ser apresentados indicadores e relatório; disponibilizar mais informações sobre os credenciados e não entender o propósito da ferramenta. Conclusão: Acredita-se que a ferramenta irá contribuir para que os auditores recém-ingressos na Marinha possam executar o processo de auditoria de acordo com a técnica, gerando uniformidade, dando celeridade e, principalmente, evitando perdas para a organização. Dessa forma, favorecendo ao profissional mais habilidade e destreza em todo processo

Introduction: One of the most efficient quality tools to monitor a management system is the audit, because, when properly applied, it diagnoses non-conformities in the service evaluated, being performed by trained professionals who have, in addition to technical-scientific knowledge, personal attributes such as impartiality, prudence and diplomacy. The general objective of the study was to develop a mobile tool that can support the medical bills audit process and the specific. Objectives: The general objective of the study was to develop a mobile tool that can support the medical bill audit process and the specific objectives were: to identify the necessary requirements for the development of the audit tool; present a prototype and develop a tool ensuring the security requirements necessary for the maintenance of personal information, enabling its implementation, distribution and modification, and evaluating the impact of the tool for health auditing within the Brazilian Navy.Method: This is a descriptive, exploratory study with a qualitative approach applied to technological production, aimed at developing a mobile computerized tool to support the medical bill audit service. For development of the tool, Pressman's methodology was used, following the steps: collection and refinement of requirements, rapid design development, prototype construction, customer evaluation and further refinement when there is a need for final design adjustments, in order to satisfy the best way to meet the needs of customers. Results: 75 forms were distributed to the Navy auditors, with 65 (84.3%) answered, it was observed that 40.9% of respondents were nurses, 29.% had no experience in auditing. The speeches of the interviewees were analyzed emerging five categories related to improvements and one the criticism, respectively: expanding the module for cost control and forecasting; regulate the services that will be provided by the contractor; guide professionals to perform the health audit; expand module so that indicators and report can be presented; provide more information about the accredited and do not understand the purpose of the tool. Conclusion: It is believed that the tool will help auditors who have recently joined the Navy to perform the audit process according to the technique, generating uniformity, speeding up and, above all, avoiding losses for the organization. In this way, providing the professional with more skill and dexterity throughout the process

Outcomes after Introduction of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy in Two Australian Tertiary Neonatal Units.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the procedural and clinical outcomes associated with the introduction of minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) into standard care at 2 tertiary Australian neonatal intensive care units. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective audit was designed before the introduction of MIST in 2018, with data collected over a period of 18 months. Procedural data were completed by the clinical team performing MIST, including clinical observations, medication use, and adverse events. The audit team collected demographic data and subsequent clinical outcomes from medical records. RESULTS: There were 135 MIST procedures recorded in 122 infants. For the included infants, the median gestation was 302/7 weeks (IQR, 276/7 to 322/7 weeks) and birth weight was 1439 g (IQR, 982-1958 g). During the MIST procedure, desaturation to a peripheral oxygen saturation of <80% was common, occurring in 75.2% of procedures. Other adverse events included need for positive pressure ventilation (10.6%) and bradycardia <100 beats per minute (13.3%). The use of atropine premedication was associated with a significantly lower incidence of bradycardia: 8.6% vs 52.9% (P < .01). Senior clinicians demonstrated higher rates of procedural success. The majority of infants (63.9%) treated with MIST did not require subsequent intubation and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: MIST can be successfully introduced in neonatal units with limited experience of this technique. The use of atropine premedication decreases the incidence of bradycardia during the procedure. Success rates can be optimized by limiting MIST to clinicians with greater competence in endotracheal intubation.

A importância dos registros de enfermagem no contexto avaliativo da auditoria / The importance of nursing records within the audit assessment context

Objetivo: Analisar a importância dos registros de enfermagem no contexto avaliativo da auditoria. Método: Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura realizada nas bases de dados LILACS, MEDLINE e BDENF, por meio dos descritores Auditoria de Enfermagem; Auditoria Clínica; Registros de Enfermagem; Anotações de Enfermagem e Enfermagem. A busca foi realizada de 12 de janeiro a 26 de fevereiro de 2018 e selecionados 17 artigos que compõem o estudo. Resultados: a importância dos registros de enfermagem no contexto avaliativo da auditoria se dá pela investigação da qualidade do cuidado prestado por meio das evidências proporcionadas nos registro/anotações de enfermagem no portuário do paciente, evitar prejuízos na continuação do cuidado, intensificar sugestões de implantações de valores educacionais por meio da educação continuada e permanente, resgatar os valores econômicos perdidos por glosas em contas hospitalares e promover a melhoria da qualidade da assistência. Conclusão: foi possível verificar que, mesmo sendo uma prática que deva ser realizada com qualidade, o processo de auditora ainda encontra muita fragilidade nas informações encontradas nos diversos registros do profissional de enfermagem, o que acarreta grandes prejuízos.

Objective: To analyze the importance of nursing records in the evaluative context of the audit. Method: This is an integrative literature review performed in the LILACS, MEDLINE and BDENF databases using the descriptors Nursing Audit; Clinical audit; Nursing records; Nursing and Nursing Notes. The search was performed from January 12 to February 26, 2018, selecting a total of 17 articles. Results: the importance of nursing records in the evaluative context of the audit is due to the investigation of the quality of care provided through the evidence provided in the nursing records/annotations in the patient's chart, avoiding losses in the continuation of care, intensifying suggestions for implantation of nursing care, educational values through continuing and continuing education, recovering the economic values lost by disallowances in hospital bills and promoting the improvement of the quality of care. Conclusion: it was possible to verify that, even though it is a practice that should be performed with quality, the audit process still finds a lot of fragility in the information found in the various records of the nursing professional, which causes great losses.

Use of a simplified clinical audit tool to evaluate hypertension and diabetes management in primary care clinics in Jamaica.

This study evaluates a simple clinical audit tool for assessing quality of care and blood pressure control among persons with hypertension in primary care clinics. A systematic random sampling of persons with diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN) attending five health centers in Kingston, Jamaica, was conducted. A modified Ministry of Health paper-based audit tool captured quality of care and outcome indicators (blood pressure and glycemic control). Additional chart audits were conducted by a physician and nurse to assess reliability. One hundred and forty-nine charts were audited between January and September 2017. One hundred and thirty-eight persons (92.6%) had hypertension (27 men and 111 women); 77 persons (51.7%) had DM (14 men and 63 women). The median age was 64 years old. Approximately two-thirds of persons with HTN and DM had electrolytes, lipid profile, and ECG done within the last year. One-fifth of persons with hypertension (18.5% men and 19.8% women, P = 1.000) had adequate blood pressure control with greater control among persons with HTN only compared to persons with both DM and HTN. Poor glycemic control was recorded for 69% of persons with DM (57% men and 71% women, P = .297). Moderate to substantial inter-rater agreement was observed for quality of care indicators. Our findings confirmed that hypertension and glycemic control are inadequate among persons attending primary care clinics in Jamaica's capital city. Simplified clinical audits can provide important quality of care and outcome indicators without losing the meaningfulness of the data collected.

Clínical Audit of Primary Treatment of Open Fractures: Antibiotic Treatment and Tetanus Prophylaxis / Auditoria clinica do tratamento primário de fraturas expostas: Tratamento antimicrobiano e profilaxia antitetânica

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether the conducts involving antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis against tetanus have been performed according to the Clinical Protocol of the Institution. Methods Descriptive and retrospective study conducted in patients of both genders, > 18 years old admitted to a public hospital specialized in emergency and trauma, to treat primary open fracture. The data of interest were surveyed in medical records, drug prescriptions, report of patients admitted in the Surgical Block and tetanus prophylaxis requests. Results A total of 241 patients were selected, mostly male (81.7%), young adults (64.3%), victims of motorcycle accidents (53.5%). Infectious complications were present in 18.7% of the fractures, the mean time for the surgical approach was 4 hours and 12 minutes, and 91.7% of the patients had preoperative antimicrobial prescription. The main inadequacies identified were: period of prescription of antimicrobial treatment (63.5%); choice of the antimicrobial scheme (59.3%) and antimicrobial dose (58.0%). Only 14.1% of the patients were immunized against tetanus. Conclusion The greatest divergences with the Clinical Protocol were observed in the issues involving the antimicrobial regimen used, doses and time of prescription, as well as in tetanus prophylaxis.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar se as condutas envolvendo o tratamento antimicrobiano e a profilaxia contra o tétano têm sido realizadas conforme o Protocolo Clínico da Instituição. Métodos Estudo descritivo e retrospectivo, realizado em pacientes de ambos os gêneros, > 18 anos, admitidos em um hospital público estadual especializado em urgência e trauma, para tratamento primário de fratura exposta. Os dados de interesse foram pesquisados em prontuários médicos, prescrições de medicamentos, relatórios de pacientes admitidos no Bloco Cirúrgico e solicitações de profilaxia antitetânica. Resultados Foram selecionados 241 pacientes, a maioria homens (81,7%), adultos jovens (64,3%), vítimas de acidentes motociclísticos (53,5%). As complicações infecciosas estiveram presentes em 18,7% das fraturas, o tempo médio para a abordagem cirúrgica foi de 4 horas e 12 minutos, e 91,7% dos pacientes tiveram prescrição do tratamento antimicrobiano no pré-operatório. As principais inadequações identificadas foram: período de prescrição do tratamento antimicrobiano (63,5%); escolha do esquema de antimicrobianos (59,3%) e dose dos antimicrobianos (58,0%). Apenas 14,1% dos pacientes foram imunizados contra o tétano. Conclusão As maiores divergências com o Protocolo Clínico foram observadas nas questões envolvendo o esquema de antimicrobianos utilizados, doses e tempo de prescrição, bem como na profilaxia antitetânica.

An injury audit in high-level male youth soccer players from English, Spanish, Uruguayan and Brazilian academies.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the most common injury types/locations in high-level male youth soccer players (YSP). DESIGN: Prospective cohort surveillance study. SETTING: Professional soccer club academies. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred and twenty-four high-level male YSP [Under 9 (U9) to U23 year-old age groups] from academies in England, Spain, Uruguay and Brazil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Injury type, location and severity were recorded during one season. Injury severity was compared between age groups, while injury type and location were compared between nations. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-three training or match injuries were recorded, giving an injury rate of 0.71 per player. Non-contact injuries were most common (58.5%), with most (44.2%) resolved between 8 and 28 days. Most injuries (75.4%) occurred in the lower limbs, with muscle (29.6%) the most commonly injured tissue. U14 and U16 suffered a greater number of severe injuries relative to U12 and U19/U20/U23/Reserves. Tendon injury rate was higher in Brazil vs. Spain (p < 0.05), with low back/sacrum/pelvis injury rate highest in Spain (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of severe injuries in U14 and U16 suggests YSP injury risk is maturation-dependent. Minimal differences in type and location between high-level YSP from four different countries suggest injury rates in this population are geographically similar.

Resumen de evidencias para políticas sobre estrategias de implementación de recomendaciones de guías de práctica clínica en el sistema de salud chileno / Summary of evidence for policies on implementation strategies of clinical practice guideline recommendations in the Chilean health system

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO Se ha observado en las guías de práctica clínica una adherencia limitada a sus recomendaciones. Esto parece estar relacionado a una serie de barreras tanto en el proceso de elaboración de las GPC como en los procesos de difusión e implementación de ellas. En consecuencia, el Ministerio de Salud de Chile solicita este resumen con el objetivo de abordar la serie de barreras a múltiples niveles del sistema de salud que limita la implementación de las GPC elaboradas por el Ministerio de Salud. METODOLOGÍA Se utilizaron estrategias de búsqueda en Pubmed, Cochrane, EMBASE, LILACS y otras bases de datos. Se utiliza la metodología de certeza de la evidencia GRADE. Aquellas revisiones categorizadas con una evaluación global "críticamente baja" no fueron consideradas en el análisis. Se limitó a incluir publicaciones de los últimos 10 años. RESULTADOS -Los recordatorios evaluados tuvieron como principal desenlace mejorar la calidad de la atención medida en términos del cumplimiento con las recomendaciones preventivas o de manejo clínico de enfermedades agudas o crónicas. -Los sistemas de apoyo a las decisiones clínicas evaluados tuvieron como principal desenlace mejorar la calidad de la atención medida en términos del cumplimiento con las recomendaciones preventivas o de manejo clínico de enfermedades agudas o crónicas -Las intervenciones mediadas por pacientes evaluadas tuvieron como principal desenlace mejorar la calidad de la atención medida en términos del cumplimiento con las recomendaciones preventivas o de manejo clínico de enfermedades agudas o crónicas. -Respecto a la Gestión de Calidad Total las intervenciones evaluadas tuvieron como principales desenlaces aquellos relacionados con el proceso de cuidado y desenlaces clínicos. -Respecto al Manejo de Casos Las intervenciones evaluadas en las revisiones sistemáticas analizadas tuvieron como desenlace primario aquellos relacionados con resultados de salud en los pacientes como mortalidad, exacerbaciones de la condición clínica específica analizada, rehospitalizaciones y consultas a servicios de urgencia o no programadas. -Respecto a la Auditoría y Retroalimentación las revisiones sistemáticas incluidas tuvieron como principal desenlace alguna medida objetiva del desempeño clínico en el ámbito sanitario o desenlaces clínicos relevantes para las personas.

Rationale and design for a cluster randomized quality-improvement trial to increase the uptake of evidence-based therapies for patients at high cardiovascular risk: The BRIDGE-Cardiovascular Prevention trial.

BACKGROUND: Translating evidence into clinical practice in the management of high cardiovascular risk patients is challenging. Few quality improvement interventions have rigorously evaluated their impact on both patient care and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives are to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention on adherence to local guidelines for the prescription of statins, antiplatelets and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers for high cardiovascular risk patients, as well as on the incidence of major cardiovascular events. DESIGN: We designed a pragmatic two arm cluster randomized trial involving 40 clusters. Clusters are randomized to receive a multifaceted quality improvement intervention or to routine practice (control). The multifaceted intervention includes: reminders, care algorithms, training of a case manager, audit and feedback reports, and distribution of educational materials to health care providers. The primary endpoint is the adherence to combined evidence-based therapies (statins, antiplatelet therapy and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) at 12 months after the intervention period in patients without contra-indications for these medications. All analyses follow the intention-to-treat principle and take the cluster design into account using linear mixed logistic regression modeling. SUMMARY: If proven effective, this multifaceted intervention would have wide utility as a means of promoting optimal usage of evidence-based interventions for the management of high cardiovascular risk patients.

An international cluster-randomized quality improvement trial to increase the adherence to evidence-based therapies for acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients: Rationale and design of the BRIDGE STROKE Trial.

BACKGROUND: Translating evidence into clinical practice in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) is challenging especially in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention on adherence to evidence-based therapies for AIS and TIA patients care. DESIGN: We designed a pragmatic, 2-arm cluster-randomized trial involving 36 clusters and 1624 patients from Brazil, Argentina, and Peru. Hospitals are randomized to receive a multifaceted quality improvement intervention (intervention group) or to routine care (control group). The BRIDGE Stroke multifaceted quality improvement intervention includes case management, reminders, health care providers' educational materials (including treatment algorithms), interactive workshops, and audit and feedback reports. Primary outcome is a composite adherence score to AIS and TIA performance measures. Secondary outcomes include an "all or none" composite end point to performance measures, the individual components of the composite end points, and clinical outcomes at 90 days following admission (stroke recurrence, death, and disability measured by the modified Rankin scale). SUMMARY: The BRIDGE Stroke Trial is an international pragmatic evaluation of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention. If effective, this intervention could be potentially extended widely to improve the quality of care and outcomes of patients with AIS or TIA.

Clinical Audit of Sexual Abuse Referral Forms to the Sexual Assault Follow-up and Evaluation Clinic, Nassau, The Bahamas, among Females Aged 13 to 19 Years / Auditoría clínica de los formularios de remisión de abuso sexual a la Clínica de Evaluación y Seguimiento de Agresiones Sexuales, Nassau, Bahamas, entre mujeres de 13 a 19 años

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the adequacy of the documentation of referral forms for sexually abused females aged 13-19 years directed to the Sexual Assault Follow-up and Evaluation (SAFE) Clinic at the Agape Family Medicine Clinic, Nassau, The Bahamas, for interim management. Methods: An approved review was performed on 123 referral forms regarding sexually abused females aged 13-19 years who attended the SAFE Clinic from 2011 to 2015. The exercise focussed on documentation adequacy based on a scoring system developed by the researchers (> 50% was assessed to be adequate; records of the referee's disposition of the patient, the date of the incident and evidence of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening were considered vital for adequacy). Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated. Results: The median age of the participants was 14 years (interquartile range: 13-15). Of the 63.4% (78) with documented nationality, 88.5% (69) were Bahamian and 11.5% (9) Haitian. Documentation status did not differ statistically significantly by nationality. Regarding documentation, 74% (91) recorded the name of the patient's school, 59.3% (73) recorded that the patient knew the assailant and 17.9% (22) indicated that the patient did not know the assailant, while 22.8% (28) did not document this latter information. Type of sexual penetration was indicated by 65.9% (81). Of the vital variables, 18.7% (23) recorded the referee's disposition of the patient, 29.8% (36) the date of the incident and 60.2% (74) evidence of STI screening; 7.3% (9) documented all three and 22.8% (28) two. The mean percentage of documentation for vital variables was 49.3% (± 3.6) for the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department, Princess Margaret Hospital, Nassau, versus 30.5% (± 4.0) for public health clinics (PHCs) (p = 0.001). Overall, 69.9% (86 of 123) of the referral forms were deemed inadequate: 64.7% (33 of 51) from the A&E Department versus 73.4% (47 of 64) from PHCs among the 115 patients who provided referral information. Conclusion: Documentation deficiencies of the sexual abuse referral forms demand reform. Complete and consistent documentation is required.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Evaluar la idoneidad de la documentación de los formularios de remisión para mujeres de 13 a 19 años sexualmente abusadas, dirigidas a la Clínica de Evaluación y Seguimiento de Agresiones Sexuales (ESAS) en la Clínica Ágape de Medicina Familiar, Nassau, Bahamas, para la administración interina. Métodos: Se aprobó una revisión para examinar 123 formularios de remisión con respecto a las mujeres de 13 a 19 años sexualmente abusadas, que asistieron a la clínica de ESAS de 2011 a 2015. El ejercicio se centró en la idoneidad de la documentación basada en un sistema de puntuación desarrollado por los investigadores (50% fue adecuado según la valoración; los registros de la disposición de la paciente en el arbitraje, la fecha del incidente y la evidencia del tamizaje de la infección de transmisión sexual (ITS), fueron todos vitales a la hora de determinar la idoneidad). Se calcularon las estadísticas descriptivas e inferenciales. Resultados: La edad promedio de las participantes fue 14 años (rango intercuartil: 13-15). De 63.4% (78) con nacionalidad documentada, el 88.5% (69) fueron bahameñas y el 11.5% (9) haitianas. El estado de la documentación en término de las estadísticas no difirió significativamente por nacionalidad. Con respecto a la documentación, el 74% (91) registró el nombre de la escuela de la paciente, 59.3% (73) registró que la paciente conocía al agresor, y el 17.9% (22) indicó que la paciente no conocía al agresor, mientras que el 22.8% (28) no documentó esta última información. El tipo de penetración sexual fue indicado por 65.9% (81). De las variables vitales, 18.7% (23) registró la disposición de la paciente en el arbitraje, 29.8% (36) la fecha del incidente, y el 60.2% (74) evidencia del tamizaje de las ITS; 7.3% (9) documentó tres de ellas y 2.8% (28) dos. El porcentaje medio de documentación de las variables vitales fue 49.3% (± 3.6) para el Departamento de Accidentes y Emergencias (A&E), Hospital Princess Margaret, Nassau, frente al 30.5% (± 4.0) de las clínicas de salud pública (CSP) (p = 0.001). En general, el 69.9% (86 de 123) de los formularios de referencia se consideró inadecuado: 64.7% (33 de 51) del Departamento de A&E frente al 73.4% (47 de 64) de las CSP entre las 115 pacientes que proporcionaron la información de la remisión. Conclusión: Las deficiencias de la documentación de los formularios de remisión de abuso sexual exigen reformas. Se requiere una documentación completa y consistente.

[Results of certification audit in Mexican hospitals, a review from 2009 to 2012]. / Revisión de los resultados de la auditoría de certificación en hospitales mexicanos de 2009 a 2012.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the participation of Mexican hospitals in the certification process (equivalent to accreditation in other countries). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Crosssectional study that analyzes results of 136 establishments audited between 2009 and 2012. Standards with an excellent rating (9.0-10.0), approving (6-8.9) and non-approving (0-5.9) were identified. With a multinomial model, the probability of obtaining non-approving, approving and excellent qualification was calculated. RESULTS: The general average score was 7.72, higher in ambulatory surgery centers (9.10), than in general hospitals (7.30) and specialty hospitals (7.99). All public establishments obtained an approval score. Hospitals audited in 2011 had a higher risk of obtaining an approval (RRR= 4.6, p<0.05) and excellent (RRR= 6.6, p<0.05) rating. CONCLUSIONS: The scope of the certification process in Mexico has been limited, with greater participation of the private sector. The evaluation certificate applied in 2011 favored the achievement of approval and excellence results. We recommend homologating the entire process with that of the Joint Commission International JCI.

OBJETIVO: Analizar la participación de hospitales mexicano en el proceso de certificación (equivalente a la acreditación en otros países). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal, analiza resultados de 136 establecimientos auditados entre 2009 y 2012. Se identificaron estándares con calificación excelente (9.0-10.0), aprobatoria (6-8.9) y no aprobatoria (0-5.9). Con un modelo logístico multinomial se calculó la probabilidad de obtener calificación no aprobatoria, aprobatoria y excelente. RESULTADOS: La calificación promedio general fue 7.72, más alta en hospitales de cirugía ambulatoria (9.10), que en hospitales generales (7.30) y de especialidad (7.99). Todos los establecimientos públicos obtuvieron calificación aprobatoria. Los hospitales auditados en 2011 tuvieron mayor riesgo de obtener calificación aprobatoria (RRR= 4.6, p<0.05) y excelente (RRR= 6.6, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONES: El alcance del proceso de certificación en México ha sido limitado, con mayor participación del sector privado. La cé- dula de evaluación aplicada en 2011 favoreció la obtención de resultados aprobatorios y de excelencia. Se recomienda homologar el proceso en su totalidad con el empleado por la Joint Commission International (JCI).

Revisión de los resultados de la auditoría de certificación en hospitales mexicanos de 2009 a 2012 / Results of certification audit in Mexican hospitals, a review from 2009 to 2012

Resumen: Objetivo: Analizar la participación de hospitales mexicanos en el proceso de certificación (equivalente a la acreditación en otros países). Material y métodos: Estudio transversal, analiza resultados de 136 establecimientos auditados entre 2009 y 2012. Se identificaron estándares con calificación excelente (9.0-10.0), aprobatoria (6-8.9) y no aprobatoria (0-5.9). Con un modelo logístico multinomial se calculó la probabilidad de obtener calificación no aprobatoria, aprobatoria y excelente. Resultados: La calificación promedio general fue 7.72, más alta en hospitales de cirugía ambulatoria (9.10), que en hospitales generales (7.30) y de especialidad (7.99). Todos los establecimientos públicos obtuvieron calificación aprobatoria. Los hospitales auditados en 2011 tuvieron mayor riesgo de obtener calificación aprobatoria (RRR= 4.6, p<0.05) y excelente (RRR= 6.6, p<0.05). Conclusiones: El alcance del proceso de certificación en México ha sido limitado, con mayor participación del sector privado. La cédula de evaluación aplicada en 2011 favoreció la obtención de resultados aprobatorios y de excelencia. Se recomienda homologar el proceso en su totalidad con el empleado por la Joint Commission International (JCI).

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the participation of Mexican hospitals in the certification process (equivalent to accreditation in other countries). Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study that analyzes results of 136 establishments audited between 2009 and 2012. Standards with an excellent rating (9.0-10.0), approving (6-8.9) and non-approving (0-5.9) were identified. With a multinomial model, the probability of obtaining non-approving, approving and excellent qualification was calculated. Results: The general average score was 7.72, higher in ambulatory surgery centers (9.10), than in general hospitals (7.30) and specialty hospitals (7.99). All public establishments obtained an approval score. Hospitals audited in 2011 had a higher risk of obtaining an approval (RRR= 4.6, p<0.05) and excellent (RRR= 6.6, p<0.05) rating. Conclusions: The scope of the certification process in Mexico has been limited, with greater participation of the private sector. The evaluation certificate applied in 2011 favored the achievement of approval and excellence results. We recommend homologating the entire process with that of the Joint Commission International JCI.

Are we doing better? Barium enema reduction of intussusception.

Introduction Intussuception remains one of the most common surgical abdominal emergencies in the paediatric population. The aim of this study was first to re-evaluate our non-operative reduction rate of intussusception using multiple interval barium enemas and second to investigate or discuss an audit cycle, providing evidence and validating the modification of clinical practice. Materials and methods This five-year retrospective study performed at one of two institutions at which a paediatric surgical service is offered. Individuals included were all patients under 12-years of age who were diagnosed with intussusception. Factors considered to be influential in the reduction of the intussusception were collected. End points were defined as successful barium enema reduction or surgical intervention. Results were compared with similar research published in 2010. Results Overall prevalence was found to be 12 cases/year, with a sample size of 60 patients, the mean age at presentation of 13.6 months. Barium enema reduction was attempted in 56/60 patients, while 4/60 patients had operative management as a first intervention. Overall reduction rate was 66% (37/56), 78% occurring on first attempt and 22% on the second attempt. There was no evidence of intussusception in 3/19 patients who had operative management as a second intervention. Delayed interval barium enema reduction demonstrated an improved reduction rate of 66% compared with single-use barium enema reduction of 41% (chi square 0.02). Conclusion A significant benefit was achieved by performing delayed interval enema reduction, which contributed to a 61% increased reduction rate, the actual reduction rate approaches 71%. The audit cycle remains of paramount importance to ensure optimum patient care.

Enuresis Management in Children: Retrospective Clinical Audit of 2861 Cases Treated with Practitioner-Assisted Bell-and-Pad Alarm.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the treatment efficacy of practitioner-assisted bell-and-pad alarm therapy in children with enuresis between the ages of 5 and 16 years by retrospective medical chart review of 2861 children in multiple clinical settings. STUDY DESIGN: This review was conducted across 7 Australian clinical practices. The primary outcome measure was the time taken for children with either primary, secondary, monosymptomatic, or nonmonosymptomatic enuresis to be dry for 14 consecutive nights. The secondary outcome measure was to determine relapse rates, defined as 1 symptom recurrence per month post interruption of treatment. Data were analyzed by correlation and χ2 test via IBM SPSS Statistics (version 22). RESULTS: The overall success rate of the bell and pad treatment was 76%, irrespective of age. The mean treatment time to achieve dryness was 62.1 ± 30.8 days, and the relapse rate was 23%. Concurrent bowel dysfunction was associated with a slightly lower success rate (74%). Concurrent lower urinary tract symptoms were associated with a lower success rate (73%) and greater relapse (1.75 times more likely to relapse). Children with secondary enuresis had significantly greater success than those with primary enuresis (82% vs 74%). CONCLUSION: The type of alarm therapy reported in this study is highly effective. This study will provide the basis for clinical guidelines and practice tools for clinicians, which will help to reduce variation in care pathways for alarm treatment for enuresis.

Multimodal strategy to improve the adherence to hand hygiene and self-assessment of the institution for the promotion and practice of hand hygiene.

Background: Hand hygiene (HH) has a low rate of adherence worldwide. This study aimed to estimate the HH adherence rate before and after the implementation of the multimodal strategy and to perform a self-assessment of an institution for promotion and practice of HH. Methods: Before and after study, conducted in a university hospital. Professionals of the medical and nursing staff were included. Data collection was from October 2013 to July 2015, through observations of the HH opportunities and application of the HH self-assessment instrument for the institution. Descriptive and univariate analysis were performed. Results: A total of 9500 HH opportunities were observed. The rate of adherence to HH in pre-intervention period was 20.8%, compared to 16.2% and 15.7% in post-intervention. Regarding the evaluation of the institution, it did not have an established ongoing program of training of professionals, no feedback of HH rates to professionals. Conclusion: The low rate of HH adherence reflected the evaluation of the institution in relation to its investment in the practice and promotion of HH, showing that the investment policy for HH adherence needs to be reviewed, considering that before the study the hospital has not been trained in the 'My Five Moments for HH'.

Auditoría de oxígenoterapia de pacientes hospitalizados en establecimientos del Servicio de Salud Talcahuano / Audit on oxygen therapy in hospitalized patients from Public Health Service of Talcahuano, Chile

El oxígeno (O2) es una de las drogas más utilizadas en clínica, su uso no está exento de riesgos. Existen guias internacionales para su uso, pero en nuestro medio no sabemos si se aplican. Nuestro objetivo fue describir la forma en que se utiliza y controla la oxígenoterapia en los 3 hospitales de la red del Servicio de Salud Talcahuano. Aplicamos una encuesta un día de agosto de 2016 a los pacientes hospitalizados en las instituciones de la red que recibían O2 en ese momento. Se recolectaron datos sobre la prescripción, administración y seguimiento de la terapia de O2. De los 381 pacientes auditados, un 13,7% recibía oxígenoterapia. Los diagnósticos más frecuentes fueron de causa respiratoria (46,15%) y cardiológica (25%). La indicación la dio un médico en 88,5% de los casos y en un 3,8% no había registro. En un 17,3% de los pacientes no había fundamento para la indicación. Se indicó una dosis fija en el 75% con una meta de SaO2 en el 50%, siendo naricera y máscara de Venturi los métodos de administración más frecuentes monitorizándose con oximetría de pulso en los hospitales menos complejos y gasometría arterial en el hospital terciario. La duración media de la oxígenoterapia fue de 7,8 días. Habiendo un buen fundamento y control de la oxígenoterapia aún no se indican metas a obtener. No hay un buen registro de la indicación ni de los cambios realizados. Creemos útil la realización periódica de este tipo de control para optimizar su uso evitando los potenciales efectos adversos en los pacientes.

Abstract Oxygen is a commonly used drug in clinics and its use must be judicious. There are guidelines for oxygen therapy but we ignore if these are respected in our country. We conducted an audit of oxygen therapy by applying a survey to 381 patients in the three hospitals of Talcahuano Public Health Service. The day of the audit 13.7% of the hospitalized patients were on oxygen, most of them with respiratory (46.15%) or cardiovascular (25%) diseases. Indication of O2 administration was given by a physician in 88.5% and there was not registry in 3.8% of the cases. There was not foundation for supplying O2 in 13.3% of patients. A fixed dose was indicated in 75% of cases and 50% had an oximetry value as a target. Oxygen was administered in most of the cases by nasal prongs and Venturi masks. Monitoring was based on pulse oximetry in the less complex hospitals and on arterial blood gases in the tertiary hospital. 100% of patients at urgency ward were receiving a different dose from that indicated at their admission time and none of them had a registry of the new dose. Mean duration of therapy was 7.8 days. We believe our results might represent what is going on with oxygen therapy in our country; having a good foundation and monitoring, we still don t use targets and there is a bad system of registry. We think that it would be advisably to carry out audits on oxygen therapy at national level on regular basis.

Implementação de evidências científicas na assistência ao parto normal: estudo longitudinal / Implementation of scientific evidences in normal childbirth care: longitudinal study

Objetivo: avaliar o impacto de uma intervenção educativa sobre práticas obstétricas e desfechos perineais. Método: estudo longitudinal, segundo a metodologia de implementação de evidências científicas na prática clínica, realizado com enfermeiros e médicos, puérperas e prontuários em uma maternidade pública de referência no estado do Amapá. Resultado: após a intervenção educativa, mais profissionais recomendaram as posições lateral e verticais no período expulsivo do parto; mais puérperas relataram as práticas de puxo dirigido e manobra de Kristeller; menos prontuários indicaram a laceração espontânea e graus de lacerações maiores. Conclusão: a intervenção educativa proporcionou resultados melhores, mas não estatisticamente significativos.

Objective: to evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on obstetric practices and perineal outcomes. Method: longitudinal study, according to the methodology of implementation of scientific evidence in clinical practice, performed with nurses and doctors, puerperas and medical records in a referred public maternity hospital in the state of Amapá. Result: after the educational intervention, more professionals recommended the lateral and vertical positions in the expulsive period of childbirth; More puerperas reported the practices of directed pull and maneuver of Kristeller; Less medical records indicated spontaneous laceration and higher degrees of lacerations. Conclusion: the educational intervention provided better results, but not statistically significant.

Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto de una intervención educativa sobre las prácticas obstétricas y resultados perineales. Método: Estudio longitudinal, de acuerdo con la metodología de implementación de la evidencia científica en la práctica clínica, realizada con las enfermeras y los médicos, las madres y los registros en una referencia maternidad pública en el estado de Amapá. Resultado: Después de la intervención educativa, la mayoría de los profesionales recomiendan las posiciones laterales y verticales en la segunda etapa del parto; más madres reportaron las prácticas de extracción y maniobra dirigida Kristeller; a menos que los registros que se indican las laceraciones espontáneas y un mayor grado de laceraciones. Conclusión: La intervención educativa poca mejora de las prácticas y los resultados perineales.

Bases para establecer un sistema de vigilancia activa y respuesta rápida para el manejo de la morbilidad materna severa / Basis for establishing a system of active surveillance and rapid response for the management of severe maternal morbidity

INTRODUCCIÓN: la razón de mortalidad materna (RMM) se ha utilizado como indicador de salud sin considerar los eventos precedentes. La morbilidad materna severa (MMS) incluye a mujeres con morbilidad asociada a un embarazo, que amenaza sus vidas pero que finalmente permite la sobrevida. OBJETIVOS: Investigar la situación de la mortalidad materna (MM) y la MMS en Misiones, Jujuy y LaRioja. Establecer bases para un sistema de vigilancia y manejo de casos.MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio multicéntrico de prevalencia con uncomponente de implementación. Mujeres embarazadas, tratadas enel subsector público entre el 1 de octubre de 2013 y el 31 de marzode 2014, fueron tamizadas para detectar condiciones potencialmentefatales (CPF) y notificar MMS y MM. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 9.921nacimientos. Ingresaron 294 mujeres, y hubo 219 (74,5%) casos de CPF, 67 (22,8%) de MMS y 8 (2,7%) de MM. Criterios de identificación por tamizaje: clínicos 78,1% de CPF, basados en enfermedad 94% de MMS, y 100% de MM presentó algún criterio clínico. Las principales causas de MMS fueron hipertensión (35,8%), hemorragias (29,9%) y complicaciones de abortos (13,4%). La incidencia global deCPF fue 2,21%, la de MMS 0,68% y la de MM 0,08%. El índice demorbimortalidad global fue de 8,4 (4,0-7,4), la tasa de letalidad globalfue del 10,7%, y el uso global de intervenciones beneficiosas para elmanejo de MMS fue del 54,8%. CONCLUSIONES: El estudio permitióconocer la MM y la MMS en las tres provincias y sentar las bases paraimplementar un sistema de vigilancia activa y respuesta rápida para elmanejo de la MMS, consistente con el Plan Operativo Nacional.

INTRODUCTION: maternal mortality ratio (MMR) has been used as an indicator of maternal health regardless of the previous events. Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) refers to women with life-threatening pregnancy-associated morbidity, who ultimately survive. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the status of maternal mortality (MM) and SMM in Misiones, Jujuy and La Rioja. To establish the basis for a system of surveillance and case management. METHODS: Amulticenter prevalence study was conducted, with an implementationcomponent. Pregnant women assisted from October 1, 2013 to March31, 2014 in the public sub-sector were screened for potentially fatalconditions (PFC) and SMM and MM notification. RESULTS: A total of 9921 births were analyzed. From 294 women participating in the study, there were 219 (74.5%) cases of PFC, 67 (22.8%) of SMM and 8 (2.7%) of MM. Clinical screening criteria identified 78.1% of cases of PFC, disease criteria identified SMM 94%, and 100% of MM showedsome clinical criterion. The main causes of SMM were hypertensivedisorders (35.8%), hemorrhagic disorders (29.9%) and abortioncomplications (13.4%). Global incidence of PFC was 2.21%, andfor SMM and MM was 0.68% and 0.08%, respectively. The overallmorbidity index was 8.4 (4.0-7.4), the overall mortality rate was 10.7%,and the overall use of beneficial interventions for the managementof SMM was 54.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The study yielded information on MM and SMM in the three provinces and laid the groundwork for implementing a system of active surveillance and rapid response to handle SMM consistently with the National Operational Plan.

Significant Reduction of Central-Line Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Network of Diverse Neonatal Nurseries.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a quality improvement (QI) initiative that was associated with a dramatic reduction in neonatal central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rate in a diverse group of 8 intensive care nurseries (Neonatal Services). STUDY DESIGN: A quasi-experimental time series QI initiative using the model for improvement and evidenced-based interventions. RESULTS: The aggregate CLABSI rate for Nationwide Children's Hospital-associated Neonatal Services decreased from 6.0 CLABSI per 1000 catheter days to 1.43 CLABSI per 1000 catheter days in less than 2 years and has remained in control at 0.68 per 1000 catheter days for over 5 years. Each of 8 nurseries has had a 1 year or more CLABSI-free period, including the neonatal intensive care unit with the largest patient volume, acuity, and central line usage. Aggregate Neonatal Services has experienced 3 CLABSI-free quarters since 2007. Key success factors included: (1) engagement of senior executive leadership; (2) bedside "huddles" among clinical and epidemiology staffs conducted within 72 hours after a positive blood culture; (3) implementation of chlorhexidine antisepsis and the use of chlorhexidine-impregnated catheter site discs; and (4) and establishment of a dedicated team for percutaneously inserted central catheter insertion to serve units in which central lines are placed less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Using the model for improvement and evidenced-based interventions, this QI project has been associated with reduction in the CLABSI rate by 89%, and over 430 CLABSIs likely have been avoided.