Cochlear Implantation in Post-Meningitis Deafness: Audiological, Imaging, and Postoperative Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Qualitative Synthesis.

INTRODUCTION: Post-meningitis deafness (PMD) is a potentially devastating cause of hearing loss among pediatric and adult patients, for which hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CIs) remains the standard of care. To date, there have been limited systematic studies on the impact of cochlear ossification (CO) and time-to-implantation (TTI) on audiological outcomes. METHODS: An online database search was performed on the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for articles within the past 20 years pertaining to audiological outcomes among pediatric and adult patients with PMD. Information on study characteristics, patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications was collected and analyzed. RESULTS: From 8,325 articles generated in the original search, 11 were included in the final analysis, representing 376 patients in total. Of the articles discussing TTI, the majority (3 of 4) found that a shorter TTI of 6 months on average led to improved audiological outcomes compared with control groups with a longer TTI. Of the articles that discussed the impact of preoperative CO, the majority (4 of 6) found that the presence of CO had a detrimental effect on postoperative audiological outcomes after CI. Finally, of the articles that discussed long-term audiological outcomes for PMD compared with the non-PMD control group after CI, the majority (4 of 7) found that PMD patients had inferior long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: CI is a safe and effective treatment modality for PMD, with the majority of literature demonstrating improved long-term outcomes for patients without CO and a reduced TTI.

Intratympanic Gentamicin Injection for Endolymphatic Hydrops After Cochlear Implantation.

Endolymphatic hydrops has been documented as a possible complication of cochlear implantation; however, few studies have addressed its treatment. We describe the first case ever reported of delayed endolymphatic hydrops after a cochlear implant successfully treated with intratympanic gentamicin injection. A detailed discussion of this case with a focus on its management and outcomes will be provided in comparison with literature data. The intratympanic gentamicin injection has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for symptomatic endolymphatic hydrops after cochlear implantation. We advocate further studies to validate this strategy as a promising alternative to surgical labyrinthectomy.

Nalbuphine in Pediatric Emergence Agitation Following Cochlear Implantation: A Randomized Trial.

Background: To investigate the effects of nalbuphine on emergency agitation (EA), which affects up to 80% of the children following otolaryngology procedures, in children undergoing cochlear implantation. Methods: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted between November 2020 and October 2022. Eligible children, aged 6 months to 3 years old, were randomly assigned to either 0.1 mg/kg, 0.15 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine or 0.9% saline groups. EA was defined by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score ≥10. Extubation time, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay, severe EA (PAED ≥ 15), peak PAED score, the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale, Ramsay sedation score, and adverse events were also recorded. Results: A total of 104 children were enrolled, with 26 children in each group. Nalbuphine significantly reduced the EA occurrence from 73.1% in the saline group to 38.5%, 30.8%, and 26.9% in the 0.1 mg/kg, 0.15 mg/kg, and 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine groups, respectively (P < 0.001), without affecting the extubation time and PACU length of stay. More children (34.6%) in the 0.9% saline group experienced severe EA. Higher dose nalbuphine (0.15 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg) showed lower peak PAED score, better analgesia and sedation effect compared with 0.1 mg/kg nalbuphine and saline groups. However, 0.2mg/kg nalbuphine caused undesired over-sedation in two (7.7%) children. No other adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Young children undergoing cochlear implantation surgery were at a high risk of EA and postoperative pain, while 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine might be an ideal candidate for EA and pain prevention when used under close monitoring. Trial Registration: ChiCTR2000040407.

Leflunomide-Associated Wound Complication After Cochlear Implantation: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implantation has become an increasingly common strategy for aural rehabilitation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss who no longer benefit from conventional amplification. In conjunction, immunosuppressive therapies (e.g. disease-modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have become the keystone of management in numerous autoimmune conditions. Given the increasing prevalence of both, a greater proportion of patients will undergo cochlear implantation while on immune-modulating medications. While these medications are usually well tolerated, immunosuppression may put patients a higher risk for device infections. At present, this is not extensively studied within the cochlear implant literature. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review and review of the literature.Results:We present the case of an 81-year-old male who experienced wound dehiscence and infection secondary to leflunomide use for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Resolution of these issues was noted with a therapeutic drug holiday, and the patient has subsequently undergone re-implantation without issue.Conclusions:The case highlights a potential CI-associated wound complication in the setting of DMARD therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of both CIs and immunosuppressive therapy, future study on the potential for interaction is warranted to identify the best management strategy in the perioperative setting.

Management of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays Misplaced in the Internal Auditory Canal: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Misplacement of electrode arrays in the internal auditory canal (IAC) presents a unique clinical challenge. Speech recognition is limited for cochlear implant (CI) users with misplaced arrays, and there are risks with revision surgery including facial and/or cochlear nerve injury. DATABASES REVIEWED: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. METHODS: A literature search was performed from inception to September 2023. The search terms were designed to capture articles on misplaced arrays and the management options. Articles written in English that described cases of array misplacement into the IAC for children and adults were included. The level of evidence was assessed using Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine guidelines. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight cases of arrays misplaced in the IAC were identified. Thirteen (46%) were patients with incomplete partition type 3 (IP3), and 7 (25%) were patients with common cavity (CC) malformations. Most misplaced arrays were identified postoperatively (19 cases; 68%). Of these cases, 11 (58%) were managed with array removal. No facial nerve injuries were reported with revision surgery. Eight cases (42%) were left in place. Several underwent mapping procedures in an attempt improve the sound quality with the CI. CONCLUSION: Electrode array misplacement in the IAC is a rare complication that reportedly occurs predominately in cases with IP3 and CC malformations. Removal of misplaced arrays from the IAC reportedly has not been associated with facial nerve injuries. Cases identified with IAC misplacement postoperatively can potentially be managed with modified mapping techniques before proceeding with revision surgery.

Safety and Early Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation of Nucleus Devices in Infants: A Multi-Centre Study.

This multi-center study examined the safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation of children between 9 and 11 months of age. The intended impact was to support practice regarding candidacy assessment and prognostic counseling of pediatric cochlear implant candidates. Data in the clinical chart of children implanted at 9-11 months of age with Cochlear Ltd devices at five cochlear implant centers in the United States and Canada were included in analyses. The study included data from two cohorts implanted with one or two Nucleus devices during the periods of January 1, 2012-December 31, 2017 (Cohort 1, n = 83) or between January 1, 2018 and May 15, 2020 (Cohort 2, n = 50). Major adverse events (requiring another procedure/hospitalization) and minor adverse events (managed with medication alone or underwent an expected course of treatment that did not require surgery or hospitalization) out to 2 years post-implant were monitored and outcomes measured by audiometric thresholds and parent-reports on the IT-MAIS and LittlEARS questionnaires were collected. Results revealed 60 adverse events in 41 children and 227 ears implanted (26%) of which 14 major events occurred in 11 children; all were transitory and resolved. Improved hearing with cochlear implant use was shown in all outcome measures. Findings reveal that the procedure is safe for infants and that they show clear benefits of cochlear implantation including increased audibility and hearing development.

Changes in hearing function and intracochlear morphology after electrode array insertion in minipigs.

BACKGROUND: In temporal bone specimens from long-term cochlear implant users, foreign body response within the cochlea has been demonstrated. However, how hearing changes after implantation and fibrosis progresses within the cochlea is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the short-term dynamic changes in hearing and cochlear histopathology in minipigs after electrode array insertion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve minipigs were selected for electrode array insertion (EAI) and the Control. Hearing tests were performed preoperatively and on 0, 7, 14, and 28 day(s) postoperatively, and cochlear histopathology was performed after the hearing tests on 7, 14, and 28 days after surgery. RESULTS: Electrode array insertion had a significant effect for the frequency range tested (1 kHz-20kHz). Exudation was evident one week after electrode array insertion; at four weeks postoperatively, a fibrous sheath formed around the electrode. At each time point, the endolymphatic hydrops was found; no significant changes in the morphology and packing density of the spiral ganglion neurons were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The effect of electrode array insertion on hearing and intracochlear fibrosis was significant. The process of fibrosis and endolymphatic hydrops seemed to not correlate with the degree of hearing loss, nor did it affect spiral ganglion neuron integrity in the 4-week postoperative period.

Delayed hearing loss after cochlear implantation: Re-evaluating the role of hair cell degeneration.

Delayed loss of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation is a common but poorly understood phenomenon due to the scarcity of relevant temporal bone tissues. Prior histopathological analysis of one case of post-implantation hearing loss suggested there were no interaural differences in hair cell or neural degeneration to explain the profound loss of low-frequency hearing on the implanted side (Quesnel et al., 2016) and attributed the threshold elevation to neo-ossification and fibrosis around the implant. Here we re-evaluated the histopathology in this case, applying immunostaining and improved microscopic techniques for differentiating surviving hair cells from supporting cells. The new analysis revealed dramatic interaural differences, with a > 80 % loss of inner hair cells in the cochlear apex on the implanted side, which can account for the post-implantation loss of residual hearing. Apical degeneration of the stria further contributed to threshold elevation on the implanted side. In contrast, spiral ganglion cell survival was reduced in the region of the electrode on the implanted side, but apical counts in the two ears were similar to that seen in age-matched unimplanted control ears. Almost none of the surviving auditory neurons retained peripheral axons throughout the basal half of the cochlea. Relevance to cochlear implant performance is discussed.

Clinical characteristics and hearing loss etiology of cochlear implantees undergoing surgery in their teens, 20s, and 30s.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the etiology of hearing loss, including genetic variants, in individuals who underwent cochlear implantation (CI) in their teens to thirties. It also sought to analyze post-CI speech performance and identify prognostic factors affecting CI outcomes in this age group. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 421 cochlear implant patients at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, focusing on 63 subjects aged 10-39 years who underwent their first CI by a single surgeon between July 2018 and June 2022. The study included audiologic evaluation, molecular genetic testing, and analysis of speech performance post-CI. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25 and GraphPad Prism 7. RESULTS: Among 63 participants (M:F, 24:39), nine underwent CI in their teens, 24 in their 20 s, and 30 in their 30 s. Most of them (40, 63.5%) had postlingual deafness. The study found that 65.2% (40/63) of subjects received a genetic diagnosis, with DFNB4 being the most common etiology (37.5%, 15/40). Post-CI speech evaluation showed an average sentence score of 80% across all subjects. Factors such as the onset of hearing loss, duration of deafness (DoD), and preoperative Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) significantly influenced CI outcomes. Notably, longer DoD was associated with poorer CI outcomes, but this did not affect individuals with postlingual hearing loss as much. CONCLUSION: The study concludes that in individuals aged 10-39 undergoing CI, the onset of hearing loss and preoperative SIR are critical predictors of postoperative outcomes. CI is recommended for those with postlingual hearing loss in this age group, irrespective of the DoD. The study highlights the importance of genetic factors especially DFNB4 in hearing loss etiology and underscores the value of the relatively easy-to-evaluate factor, preoperative SIR in predicting CI outcomes.

Postoperative complications in cochlear implant surgery and their possible risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: This is a retrospective analysis of the major and minor complications of cochlear implants, as well as the Risk Factors (RF) involved. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of patients submitted to cochlear implants at public University from 2006 to July 2019, and list here the major and minor complications found, and their risk factors. RESULTS: There were 193 ears, 100 (51.3%) from females and 93 (48.2%) from males, with a mean age of 23.63 years. In 54 of them (28%), there were alterations seen in the Temporal Bone CT scan, and 44 (22.8%) in the brain MRI. There were 158 (81.9%) insertions performed; 127 (65.8%) of them through the round window. There were 78 complications: 19 (9.8%) major and 56 (29%) minor complications. Among the major complications, there were 3 (1.6%) Surgical Site infections (SS); 5 (2.6%) hematomas/seromas; 5 (2.6%) electrode extrusion; 5 (2.6%) device faults; 1 (0.5%) wrong path. Among the minor complications, there were 6 (3.1%) Acute Otitis Media (AOM); 9 (4.7%) SS infections; 4 (2.1%) facial paresis; 17 (8.8%) vertigos; 9 (4.7%) with tinnitus. The most important RF was age. Patients younger than 2.5 years had more major complications: SS infection (p = 0.018) and electrode extrusion (p = 0.017). There was a higher rate of vertigo in adults (p = 0.003), and it was more often associated with comorbidities (p = 0.008). The insertion route, the presence of changes in CT and MRI and the CI brand used did not impact the number of complications. CONCLUSION: Among the minor complications, those involving the vestibular system were the most common, especially in adults with comorbidities. Regarding major complications, there was an emphasis on SS infections, hematomas, seromas, electrode extrusion, especially in children under two years of age. There were implanted device faults (2.6%), with none of the brands evaluated standing out.

Temporal Swelling Following Cochlear Implantation: Frequency, Treatment, and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency, treatment, and outcomes of postoperative delayed-onset swelling around cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, nonrandomized group study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS: Among 354 patients (516 ears) who underwent cochlear implantation (CI) at our hospital between May 2009 and October 2022, 329 (472 ears: 138 children [246 ears] and 191 adults [226 ears]) with a follow-up period of >3 months were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical examination and computed tomography of the head were performed. RESULTS: In total, 5.5% (26/472 ears) had a history of delayed-onset swelling around the implant. This complication occurred in 9.8% (24/246 ears) of children and 0.9% (2/226 ears) of adults. The mean time to onset of swelling was 50 (range, 5.5-147) months following CI. In 60% (21/35) of the cases, the cause was unknown, whereas in 25.7% (9/35) and 11.5% (4/35) of cases, it was head trauma and acute inflammation, respectively. Conservative treatment (observation, antibiotics, and/or strong magnetic compression) was adapted in 91.4% (32/35) of cases. After conservative treatment, revision CI surgery was performed in one ear. Additionally, recurrent swelling was observed in 23.1% (6/26 ears) of swelling cases. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that delayed-onset swelling around implants occurs more frequently in children than in adults because of the higher incidence rates of head trauma and acute otitis media in children. In most cases, conservative treatment was adequate; however, careful follow-up is necessary. Our findings can serve as a reference for optimizing care and intervention options after CI.

Pneumatocoele after cochlear implantation with lateral petrosectomy: A minor complication?

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the clinical features and management of pneumatocoele presenting with a trap-valve mechanism after cochlear implantation with lateral petrosectomy (LP) in comparison with literature. INTRODUCTION: Pneumatocoele is a rare complication of cochlear implant (CI) surgery, generally managed with conservative treatments. METHODS: We describe a progressively increasing pneumatocoele with a trap-valve mechanism occurring one year after CI with LP, successfully managed with revision surgery. Literature review was performed on this topic. RESULTS: Our case was the second ever reported in literature. It appeared consequently to forceful nose-blowing in a patient with refractory nasal polyposis. Unlike the pneumatocoeles reported after standard CI, we advised revision surgery as well as in the case of pneumatocoele after staged LP and CI. In both the patients subcutaneous air collection occurred as a late complication and an insufficient Eustachian tube closure was disclosed, which is considered a complication of LP itself. Surgical management was necessary in consideration of the risk of ascending infections associated with Eustachian tube patency in LP with CI. CONCLUSION: We consider surgical treatment mandatory in pneumatocoele after CI with LP, it is indeed the sentinel of the restoration of Eustachian tube patency and the potential prelude to major complications.

[The value of HRCT in predicting cerebrospinal fluid gusher during cochlear implantation].

Objective:To investigate the predictive value of temporal bone high-resolution CT（HRCT） multiplanar reconstruction（MPR） for cerebrospinal fluid（CSF） gusher during cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformation. Methods:The clinical data of 33 patients（36 ears） with inner ear malformation who underwent cochlear implantation were retrospectively analyzed. The predictive value of HRCT for cerebrospinal fluid gusher during cochlear implantation was evaluated. Results:The width of the cochlear foramen（P=0.024, OR=1.735） and the diameter of the inner auditory meatus（P=0.022, OR=6.119） were independent risk factors for CSF gusher during cochlear implantation. The area under the curve（AUC） of cochlear foramen width in predicting intraoperative gusher was 0.851, the sensitivity was 93.33%, and the specificity was 61.90%. The AUC of the upper and lower diameter of the internal auditory canal for predicting intraoperative gusher was 0.848, the sensitivity was 80.00%, and the specificity was 80.95%. The AUC of cochlear foramen width combined with the upper and lower diameters of the internal auditory meatus for predicting intraoperative gusher was 0.930, the sensitivity was 80.00%, and the specificity was 95.24%. Conclusion:Based on temporal bone HRCT, the prediction model of cochlear foramen width combined with the upper and lower diameter of the internal auditory canal has crucial predictive value for the "gusher" during cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformation.

Demographic analysis of hearing impairment based on various parameters in patients with cochlear implant.

Objectives: To analyse the demographic and clinical variables in children having undergone cochlear implant surgery because of deafness. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from January to November 2022 at the Centre for Research in Experimental and Applied Medicine laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, in collaboration with the Ear, Nose and Throat Department of Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, and comprised children of eith gender aged up to 10 years who had received cochlear implant. Data was collected through questionnaire-based detailed interviews. Syndromic Hearing Loss, Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss, and Acquired Hearing Loss were identified among the subjects. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Of the 250 cases, 147(58.8%) were boys, 146(58.4%) were aged 0-5 years, 219(87.6%) had prelingual onset of disease, and 202(80.8%) had a non-progressive disease course. In 203(81.2%) cases, normal developmental milestones were seen. Parental consanguinity was observed in 219(87.6%) cases. However, 63(25.2%) patients had a first-degree relative who had a history of deafness. In 170(68%) cases, hearing loss was hereditary, whereas in 80(32%) it was acquired. Meningitis was the most commonly identified risk factor 55(68.75%). Acquired risk factors and family history had significant association with hearing loss (p<0.05). Speech perception significantly improved in all 219(100%) patients with prelingual hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the cases were found to be male, had a prelingual disease onset and a non-progressive disease course. Family history was a significant factor, while meningitis was the most common acquired cause of hearing loss.

The Petrosquamosal Sinus: A Rare Vascular Variant Encountered During Cochlear Implantation Surgery.

The petrosquamosal sinus is a rare and almost unknown emissary vein of the temporal bone. It traverses the middle cranial fossa along the petrosquamosal fissure and connects dural sinuses with extracranial venous networks. It is known to undergo normal involution during fetal and early postnatal life, and therefore is rarely found in humans. When encountered during surgery, it can be a significant source of bleeding hindering proper visualization of important surgical landmarks. Here we report the case of a PSS, encountered in a child during cochlear implantation surgery. We discuss its clinical significance and impact on the surgical approach. Laryngoscope, 134:4111-4113, 2024.

Exploring Trauma Patterns and Contributing Factors With Slim Straight Electrode Array After Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess trauma patterns associated with the insertion of lateral wall electrode arrays. The study focused on 3 categories-scala tympani (ST), intermediate, and scala vestibuli (SV)-to identify traumatic patterns and contributing factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Data from 106 cochlear implant recipients at a tertiary otologic center. METHODS: Demographic and surgical data were collected from recipients who underwent cochlear implantation manually and with RobOtol®. Measurements included cochlear dimensions, angular depth of insertion, and position of the first electrode. Three-dimensional reconstructions were used to analyze the electrode array location relative to the basilar membrane, categorized into ST, intermediate, and SV electrodes. Nontraumatic insertion was defined as all electrodes in the ST, while traumatic insertions had 1 or more electrodes in intermediate or SV locations. RESULTS: Out of 106 cases, 44% had nontraumatic and 56% had traumatic insertions. Demographic and surgical characteristics showed no association with traumatic insertions. A deeper position of the first electrode, relative to the round window, was associated with traumatic insertions (P = .03). Three trauma patterns were observed: distal (facing the apical electrodes), proximal (facing the middle electrodes around 180°), and distal/proximal. CONCLUSION: This study considers the intermediate position which could be associated with basilar membrane lesions. Risk zones for intracochlear trauma with lateral wall arrays were identified distally and proximally. Traumatic insertions were independently linked to deeper array placement. Future studies should explore whether gentler insertion, without insisting on further electrode array insertion depth, could reduce the trauma during cochlear implantation.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the setting of cochlear implantation: a retrospective analysis of 700 cases.

PURPOSE: Postoperative wound infections after cochlear implantation are rare but sometimes serious and can lead to explantation. Therefore, perioperative antibiotic administration is often recommended. However, in clinical practice, the type and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis varies between different centers. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative complications. METHODS: 700 patients who underwent cochlear implantation between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated with regard to wound infections within the first 28 postoperative days. These were classified into major and minor complications. Data were analyzed using the IBM statistical program SPSS. RESULTS: In 670 out of 700 patients the type and duration of perioperative antibiotic administration could be reconstructed from the records. Of these 67 patients (10%) received antibiotics as a single shot, 158 patients (23.6%) were treated with antibiotics for a period of 48 h, and 445 patients (66.4%) received prolonged antibiotic therapy for more than 72 h. In total 64 patients (9.5%) showed abnormalities in wound assessment within the first 28 postoperative days after implantation. Major infections (1.6%) were detected in 11 patients. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in wound infection rates between the group receiving single-shot antibiosis and the group receiving 48 h prophylaxis or antibiotic treatment > 72 h (p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving an antibiotic single shot do not appear to be at significantly increased risk for postoperative wound infections compared with patients with prolonged antibiotic treatment. Continuation of data collection across centers seems reasonable.

Implantation and reimplantation: epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis over the last 30 years.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing number of cochlear implant (CI) recipients, growing indications, and the aging population, the reimplantation of CI recipients has become a focus of attention. The aim of this study is to examine the causes, timing, and postoperative speech understanding in a large cohort over the past 30 years. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was conducted on over 4000 CI recipients and 214 reimplanted children and adults from 1993 to 2020. This involved collecting and comparing data on causes, manufacturer information, and demographic data. In addition, a comparison of speech understanding in Freiburg monosyllables and numbers before and after reimplantation was carried out. RESULTS: Children did not exhibit elevated rates of reimplantation. The overall reimplantation rate in the entire cohort was 5%. The CI overall survival rate after 10 years in the entire cohort was 95.2%. Device failure was the most common reason for reimplantation, with 48% occurring within the first 5 years after implantation. The second most common reason was medical complications, with the risk of reimplantation decreasing as more time passed since the initial implantation. There were no significant differences in Freiburg numbers and monosyllable comprehension before and after reimplantation, both in the overall cohort and in the subcohorts based on indications. Even a technical upgrade did not result in a significant improvement in speech understanding. DISCUSSION: There was no significant difference in the frequency of reimplantation based on patient age, especially when comparing children and adults. Device failure is by far the most common indication for reimplantation, with no significant difference in implant survival between manufacturers. Patients most often choose the same manufacturer for reimplantation. The likelihood of reimplantation decreases with increasing time since the initial implantation. The indication for reimplantation should be carefully considered, as on average, no improved speech understanding is achieved, regardless of the cause, even with a technical upgrade.

An overview of risk factors, management and prevention of cochlear implant infections.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With cochlear implantation becoming increasingly performed worldwide, an understanding of the risk factors, preventive measures, and management of cochlear implant (CI) infection remains important given the significant morbidity and cost it conveys. RECENT FINDINGS: At the turn of the 21st century there was a decrease in rates of CI infection, particularly meningitis, following the discontinuation of positioner use for CI. However, in more recent years rates of CI infection have remained largely static. Recently, studies evaluating preventive measures such as pneumococcal vaccination, S. aureus decolonization and surgical antibiotic prophylaxis have emerged in the literature. SUMMARY: Prompt recognition of CI infection and appropriate investigation and management are key, however at present treatment is largely informed by cohort and case-control studies and expert opinion. Preventive measures including pneumococcal vaccination, S. aureus decolonization and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis play a role in reducing rates of CI infection. However, there remains a need for well designed clinical trials to provide higher level evidence to better guide preventive measures for, and management decisions of, CI infections in the future.

Day-case otology: Special attention to the pediatric cochlear implantation procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the feasibility of cochlear implantation as day-surgery in children and identify variables influencing admission, readmission, and unplanned postoperative consultation. METHODS: This retrospective observational monocentric study was conducted according to the STROBE recommendations. Between January 2017 and July 2022, all medical records of children who underwent cochlear implantation were analyzed. Eligible children were admitted for the first time to the pediatric day-surgery unit. Exclusion criteria were children planned for inpatient procedure, bilateralization or explantation-reimplantation. Sex assigned at birth, analgesic medication, anesthesia and complications were related to categorical variables. Age, duration of anesthesia, length of stay and ASA score were related to continuous variables. RESULTS: We included 66 children from a total of 106. Mean age was 53 months [SD: 46 months, range 8-184 months]. Successful day-surgery management was observed in 86% of cases. In 14% of cases, children were admitted to the pediatric ENT unit for the following reasons: late awakening in 6%, non-controlled pain in 4.5%, postoperative nausea and vomiting in 3.5% of cases. Univariate analysis did not observe any factor promoting success of day-surgery regarding anesthetic agents. Age was not statistically significant as a factor of ambulatory failure. Time spent in the operating room was not a determining factor (p = 0.559). None of the children were rehospitalized. Early unplanned consultations were observed in 3% of cases for vertex edema in 1 case and uncomplicated otorrhea in 1 case. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the knowledge on pediatric cochlear implantation and suggests that this procedure is suitable for day-surgery at any age.