Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 866
Filter
1.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(8): 870-877, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142309

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: Evaluation of the Slim Modiolar (SM) electrode in temporal bones (TB) will elucidate the electrode's insertion outcomes. BACKGROUND: The SM electrode was designed for atraumatic insertion into the scala tympani, for ideal perimodiolar positioning and with a smaller caliber to minimize interference with cochlear biological processes. METHODS: The SM electrode was inserted into TBs via a cochleostomy. First, the axial force of insertion was measured. Next, TBs were inserted under fluoroscopy to study insertion dynamics, followed by histologic evaluation of electrode placement and cochlear trauma. A subset of TBs were inserted with the Contour Advance (CA) electrode for comparison. RESULTS: Sixteen of 22 insertions performed to measure the axial force of insertion had flat or near zero insertion force profiles. Six insertions had increased insertion forces, which were attributed to improper sheath depth before electrode insertion. Under real-time fluoroscopy, 23 of 25 TBs had uneventful insertion and good perimodiolar placement. There was 1 scala vestibuli insertion due to suboptimal cochleostomy position and 1 tip roll over related to premature electrode deployment. When compared with the CA electrode, 14 of 15 insertions with the SM electrode resulted in a more perimodiolar electrode position. No evidence of trauma was found in histologic evaluation of the 24 TBs with scala tympani insertions. CONCLUSION: TB evaluation revealed that the SM electrode exerts minimal insertion forces on cochlear structures, produces no histologic evidence of trauma, and reliably assumes the perimodiolar position. Nonstandard cochleostomy location, improper sheath insertion depth, or premature deployment of the electrode may lead to suboptimal outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cochlea , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Temporal Bone , Temporal Bone/surgery , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlea/surgery , Cochlea/diagnostic imaging , Scala Tympani/surgery , Electrodes, Implanted
2.
Biomed Eng Online ; 23(1): 65, 2024 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38987764

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants (CI) are implantable medical devices that enable the perception of sounds and the understanding of speech by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve in case of inner ear damage. The stimulation takes place via an array of electrodes surgically inserted in the cochlea. After CI implantation, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used to evaluate the position of the electrodes. Moreover, CBCT is used in research studies to investigate the relationship between the position of the electrodes and the hearing outcome of CI user. In clinical routine, the estimation of the position of the CI electrodes is done manually, which is very time-consuming. RESULTS: The aim of this study was to optimize procedures of automatic electrode localization from CBCT data following CI implantation. For this, we analyzed the performance of automatic electrode localization for 150 CBCT data sets of 10 different types of electrode arrays. Our own implementation of the method by Noble and Dawant (Lecture notes in computer science (Including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), Springer, pp 152-159, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_19 ) for automated electrode localization served as a benchmark for evaluation. Differences in the detection rate and the localization accuracy across types of electrode arrays were evaluated and errors were classified. Based on this analysis, we developed a strategy to optimize procedures of automatic electrode localization. It was shown that particularly distantly spaced electrodes in combination with a deep insertion can lead to apical-basal confusions in the localization procedure. This confusion prevents electrodes from being detected or assigned correctly, leading to a deterioration in localization accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: We propose an extended cost function for automatic electrode localization methods that prevents double detection of electrodes to avoid apical-basal confusions. This significantly increased the detection rate by 11.15 percent points and improved the overall localization accuracy by 0.53 mm (1.75 voxels). In comparison to other methods, our proposed cost function does not require any prior knowledge about the individual cochlea anatomy.


Subject(s)
Automation , Cochlear Implants , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Electrodes, Implanted , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlea/diagnostic imaging
3.
J Neural Eng ; 21(4)2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39029505

ABSTRACT

Objective. The cochlear implant (CI) belongs to the most successful neuro-prostheses. Traditionally, the stimulating electrode arrays are inserted into the scala tympani (ST), the lower cochlear cavity, which enables simple surgical access. However, often deep insertion is blocked, e.g. by ossification, and the auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) of lower frequency regions cannot be stimulated causing severe restrictions in speech understanding. As an alternative, the CI can be inserted into the scala vestibuli (SV), the other upper cochlear cavity.Approach. In this computational study, the excitability of 25 ANFs are compared for stimulation with ST and SV implants. We employed a 3-dimensional realistic human cochlear model with lateral wall electrodes based on aµ-CT dataset and manually traced fibers. A finite element approach in combination with a compartment model of a spiral ganglion cell was used to simulate monophasic stimulation with anodic (ANO) and cathodic (CAT) pulses of 50µs.Main results. ANO thresholds are lower in ST (mean/std =µ/σ= 189/55µA) stimulation compared to SV (µ/σ= 323/119µA) stimulation. Contrary, CAT thresholds are higher for the ST array (µ/σ= 165/42µA) compared to the SV array (µ/σ= 122/46µA). The threshold amplitude depends on the specific fiber-electrode spatial relationship, such as lateral distance from the cochlear axis, the angle between electrode and target ANF, and the curvature of the peripheral process. For CAT stimulation the SV electrodes show a higher selectivity leading to less cross-stimulation of additional fibers from different cochlear areas.Significance. We present a first simulation study with a human cochlear model that investigates an additional CI placement into the SV and its impact on the excitation behavior. Results predict comparable outcomes to ST electrodes which confirms that SV implantation might be an alternative for patients with a highly obstructed ST.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Nerve , Scala Tympani , Scala Vestibuli , Humans , Cochlear Nerve/physiology , Scala Tympani/physiology , Scala Tympani/surgery , Scala Vestibuli/physiology , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Electrodes, Implanted , Electric Stimulation/methods , Electric Stimulation/instrumentation , Cochlea/physiology , Computer Simulation
4.
Hear Res ; 451: 109074, 2024 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39018768

ABSTRACT

Many children with profound hearing loss have received cochlear implants (CI) to help restore some sense of hearing. There is, however, limited research on long-term neurocognitive outcomes in young adults who have grown up hearing through a CI. This study compared the cognitive outcomes of early-implanted (n = 20) and late-implanted (n = 21) young adult CI users, and typically hearing (TH) controls (n=56), all of whom were enrolled in college. Cognitive fluidity, nonverbal intelligence, and American Sign Language (ASL) comprehension were assessed, revealing no significant differences in cognition and nonverbal intelligence between the early and late-implanted groups. However, there was a difference in ASL comprehension, with the late-implanted group having significantly higher ASL comprehension. Although young adult CI users showed significantly lower scores in a working memory and processing speed task than TH age-matched controls, there were no significant differences in tasks involving executive function shifting, inhibitory control, and episodic memory between young adult CI and young adult TH participants. In an exploratory analysis of a subset of CI participants (n = 17) in whom we were able to examine crossmodal plasticity, we saw greater evidence of crossmodal recruitment from the visual system in late-implanted compared with early-implanted CI young adults. However, cortical visual evoked potential latency biomarkers of crossmodal plasticity were not correlated with cognitive measures or ASL comprehension. The results suggest that in the late-implanted CI users, early access to sign language may have served as a scaffold for appropriate cognitive development, while in the early-implanted group early access to oral language benefited cognitive development. Furthermore, our results suggest that the persistence of crossmodal neuroplasticity into adulthood does not necessarily impact cognitive development. In conclusion, early access to language - spoken or signed - may be important for cognitive development, with no observable effect of crossmodal plasticity on cognitive outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Cognition , Comprehension , Neuronal Plasticity , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Female , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Adolescent , Time Factors , Age Factors , Neuropsychological Tests , Memory, Short-Term , Executive Function , Treatment Outcome , Hearing , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation
5.
Hear Res ; 451: 109088, 2024 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39032483

ABSTRACT

Combining a cochlear implant with contralateral acoustic hearing typically enhances speech understanding, although this improvement varies among CI users and can lead to an interference effect. This variability may be associated with the effectiveness of the integration between electric and acoustic stimulation, which might be affected by the temporal mismatch between the two listening sides. Finding methods to compensate for the temporal mismatch might contribute to the optimal adjustment of bimodal devices and to improve hearing in CI users with contralateral acoustic hearing. The current study investigates cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) in normal hearing listeners (NH) and CI users with contralateral acoustic hearing. In NH, the amplitude of the N1 peak and the maximum phase locking value (PLV) were analyzed under monaural, binaural, and binaural temporally mismatched conditions. In CI users, CAEPs were measured when listening with CI only (CIS_only), acoustically only (AS_only) and with both sides together (CIS+AS). When listening with CIS+AS, various interaural delays were introduced between the electric and acoustic stimuli. In NH listeners, interaural temporal mismatch resulted in decreased N1 amplitude and PLV. Moreover, PLV is suggested as a more sensitive measure to investigate the integration of information between the two listening sides. CI users showed varied N1 latencies between the AS_only and CIS_only listening conditions, with increased N1 amplitude when the temporal mismatch was compensated. A tendency towards increased PLV was also observed, however, to a lesser extent than in NH listeners, suggesting a limited integration between electric and acoustic stimulation. This work highlights the potential of CAEPs measurement to investigate cortical processing of the information between two listening sides in NH and bimodal CI users.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Cortex , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Speech Perception , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Young Adult , Time Factors , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Reaction Time , Case-Control Studies , Hearing , Electroencephalography , Auditory Threshold , Auditory Perception
6.
Hear Res ; 451: 109079, 2024 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053297

ABSTRACT

Brain plasticity refers to the brain's ability to reorganize its structure or function in response to experiences, learning, and environmental influences. This phenomenon is particularly significant in individuals with deafness, as the brain adapts to compensate for the lack of auditory stimulation. The aim of this study is to investigate whether cochlear implantation can restore a normal pattern of brain activation following auditory stimulation in cases of asymmetric hearing loss. We used a PET-scan technique to assess brain activity after cochlear implantation, specifically during an auditory voice/non-voice discrimination task. The results indicated a nearly normal pattern of brain activity during the auditory discrimination task, except for increased activation in areas related to attentional processes compared to controls. Additionally, brain activity at rest showed significant changes in implanted participants, including cross modal visuo-auditory processing. Therefore, cochlear implants can restore the brain's activation pattern through long-term adaptive adjustments in intrinsic brain activity.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Adaptation, Physiological , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Neuronal Plasticity , Positron-Emission Tomography , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Brain Mapping/methods , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiopathology , Hearing , Case-Control Studies , Auditory Perception , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/diagnostic imaging , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/psychology , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/diagnostic imaging , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/surgery , Aged , Correction of Hearing Impairment , Discrimination, Psychological
7.
Hear Res ; 450: 109075, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986164

ABSTRACT

Contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading symmetric biphasic (C-BP) pulses for electrical stimulation. It remains unclear whether asymmetric pulses emphasizing the anodic or cathodic phase may improve spectral and temporal coding with CIs. This study tested place- and temporal-pitch sensitivity with C-BP, anodic-centered triphasic (A-TP), and cathodic-centered triphasic (C-TP) pulse trains on apical, middle, and basal electrodes in 10 implanted ears. Virtual channel ranking (VCR) thresholds (for place-pitch sensitivity) were measured at both a low and a high pulse rate of 99 (Experiment 1) and 1000 (Experiment 2) pulses per second (pps), and amplitude modulation frequency ranking (AMFR) thresholds (for temporal-pitch sensitivity) were measured at a 1000-pps pulse rate in Experiment 3. All stimuli were presented in monopolar mode. Results of all experiments showed that detection thresholds, most comfortable levels (MCLs), VCR thresholds, and AMFR thresholds were higher on more basal electrodes. C-BP pulses had longer active phase duration and thus lower detection thresholds and MCLs than A-TP and C-TP pulses. Compared to C-TP pulses, A-TP pulses had lower detection thresholds at the 99-pps but not the 1000-pps pulse rate, and had lower MCLs at both pulse rates. A-TP pulses led to lower VCR thresholds than C-BP pulses, and in turn than C-TP pulses, at the 1000-pps pulse rate. However, pulse shape did not affect VCR thresholds at the 99-pps pulse rate (possibly due to the fixed temporal pitch) or AMFR thresholds at the 1000-pps pulse rate (where the overall high performance may have reduced the changes with different pulse shapes). Notably, stronger polarity effect on VCR thresholds (or more improvement in VCR with A-TP than with C-TP pulses) at the 1000-pps pulse rate was associated with stronger polarity effect on detection thresholds at the 99-pps pulse rate (consistent with more degeneration of auditory nerve peripheral processes). The results suggest that A-TP pulses may improve place-pitch sensitivity or spectral coding for CI users, especially in situations with peripheral process degeneration.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Pitch Perception , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Male , Female , Adult , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Acoustic Stimulation , Prosthesis Design , Pitch Discrimination , Time Factors
8.
Hear Res ; 450: 109076, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991628

ABSTRACT

As part of a longitudinal study regarding the benefit of early cochlear implantation for children with single-sided deafness, the current work explored the children's daily device use, potential barriers to full-time device use, and the children's ability to understand speech with the cochlear implant (CI). Data were collected from 20 children with prelingual SSD who received a CI before the age of 2.5 years, from the initial activation of the sound processor until the children were 4.8 to 11.0 years old. Daily device use was extracted from the CI's data logging, while word perception in quiet was assessed using direct audio input to the children's sound processor. The children's caregivers completed a questionnaire about habits, motivations, and barriers to device use. The children with SSD and a CI used their device on average 8.3 h per day, corresponding to 63 % of their time spent awake. All children except one could understand speech through the CI, with an average score of 59 % on a closed-set test and 73 % on an open-set test. More device use was associated with higher speech perception scores. Parents were happy with their decision to pursue a CI for their child. Certain habits, like taking off the sound processor during illness, were associated with lower device use. Providing timely counselling to the children's parents, focused on SSD-specific challenges, may be helpful to improve daily device use in these children.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Female , Male , Child , Child, Preschool , Time Factors , Longitudinal Studies , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Speech Intelligibility , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/psychology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Comprehension , Treatment Outcome , Child Language , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/diagnosis , Deafness/surgery , Age Factors , Child Behavior , Motivation , Infant
9.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(6): 3833-3847, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884525

ABSTRACT

For cochlear implant (CI) listeners, holding a conversation in noisy and reverberant environments is often challenging. Deep-learning algorithms can potentially mitigate these difficulties by enhancing speech in everyday listening environments. This study compared several deep-learning algorithms with access to one, two unilateral, or six bilateral microphones that were trained to recover speech signals by jointly removing noise and reverberation. The noisy-reverberant speech and an ideal noise reduction algorithm served as lower and upper references, respectively. Objective signal metrics were compared with results from two listening tests, including 15 typical hearing listeners with CI simulations and 12 CI listeners. Large and statistically significant improvements in speech reception thresholds of 7.4 and 10.3 dB were found for the multi-microphone algorithms. For the single-microphone algorithm, there was an improvement of 2.3 dB but only for the CI listener group. The objective signal metrics correctly predicted the rank order of results for CI listeners, and there was an overall agreement for most effects and variances between results for CI simulations and CI listeners. These algorithms hold promise to improve speech intelligibility for CI listeners in environments with noise and reverberation and benefit from a boost in performance when using features extracted from multiple microphones.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deep Learning , Noise , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Algorithms , Young Adult , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation
10.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(6): 3589-3599, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829154

ABSTRACT

Frequency importance functions (FIFs) for simulated bimodal hearing were derived using sentence perception scores measured in quiet and noise. Acoustic hearing was simulated using low-pass filtering. Electric hearing was simulated using a six-channel vocoder with three input frequency ranges, resulting in overlap, meet, and gap maps, relative to the acoustic cutoff frequency. Spectral holes present in the speech spectra were created within electric stimulation by setting amplitude(s) of channels to zero. FIFs were significantly different between frequency maps. In quiet, the three FIFs were similar with gradually increasing weights with channels 5 and 6 compared to the first three channels. However, the most and least weighted channels slightly varied depending on the maps. In noise, the patterns of the three FIFs were similar to those in quiet, with steeper increasing weights with channels 5 and 6 compared to the first four channels. Thus, channels 5 and 6 contributed to speech perception the most, while channels 1 and 2 contributed the least, regardless of frequency maps. Results suggest that the contribution of cochlear implant frequency bands for bimodal speech perception depends on the degree of frequency overlap between acoustic and electric stimulation and if noise is absent or present.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Noise , Speech Perception , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Perceptual Masking , Adult
11.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241261480, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38887094

ABSTRACT

This multi-center study examined the safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation of children between 9 and 11 months of age. The intended impact was to support practice regarding candidacy assessment and prognostic counseling of pediatric cochlear implant candidates. Data in the clinical chart of children implanted at 9-11 months of age with Cochlear Ltd devices at five cochlear implant centers in the United States and Canada were included in analyses. The study included data from two cohorts implanted with one or two Nucleus devices during the periods of January 1, 2012-December 31, 2017 (Cohort 1, n = 83) or between January 1, 2018 and May 15, 2020 (Cohort 2, n = 50). Major adverse events (requiring another procedure/hospitalization) and minor adverse events (managed with medication alone or underwent an expected course of treatment that did not require surgery or hospitalization) out to 2 years post-implant were monitored and outcomes measured by audiometric thresholds and parent-reports on the IT-MAIS and LittlEARS questionnaires were collected. Results revealed 60 adverse events in 41 children and 227 ears implanted (26%) of which 14 major events occurred in 11 children; all were transitory and resolved. Improved hearing with cochlear implant use was shown in all outcome measures. Findings reveal that the procedure is safe for infants and that they show clear benefits of cochlear implantation including increased audibility and hearing development.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Infant , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Male , Female , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Canada , United States , Time Factors , Retrospective Studies , Auditory Threshold , Postoperative Complications
12.
Hear Res ; 450: 109069, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889562

ABSTRACT

Spoken language development after pediatric cochlear implantation requires rapid and efficient processing of novel, degraded auditory signals and linguistic information. These demands for rapid adaptation tax the information processing speed ability of children who receive cochlear implants. This study investigated the association of speed of information processing ability with spoken language outcomes after cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children aged 4-6 years. Two domain-general (visual, non-linguistic) speed of information processing measures were administered to 21 preschool-aged children with cochlear implants and 23 normal-hearing peers. Measures of speech recognition, language (vocabulary and comprehension), nonverbal intelligence, and executive functioning skills were also obtained from each participant. Speed of information processing was positively associated with speech recognition and language skills in preschool-aged children with cochlear implants but not in normal-hearing peers. This association remained significant after controlling for hearing group, age, nonverbal intelligence, and executive functioning skills. These findings are consistent with models suggesting that domain-general, fast-efficient information processing speed underlies adaptation to speech perception and language learning following implantation. Assessment and intervention strategies targeting speed of information processing may provide better understanding and development of speech-language skills after cochlear implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Executive Function , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Child , Female , Child, Preschool , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Case-Control Studies , Child Language , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Comprehension , Language Development , Vocabulary , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Intelligence , Age Factors , Language Tests
13.
Int J Med Robot ; 20(4): e2654, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941214

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The method of stem cell transfer to narrow cochlear canals in vivo to generate hair cells is still an unclear operation. Thus, the development of any possible method that will ensure the usage of medical microrobots in small cochlear workspaces is a challenging procedure. METHODS: The current study tries to introduce a macro-micro manipulator system composed of a 6-DoF industrial serial manipulator as a macro manipulator and a proposed 5-DoF parallel manipulator with dual end effectors as a micro manipulator carrying permanent magnets for tetherless microrobot actuation inside the cochlea. RESULTS: Throughout the study, structural synthesis and kinematic analysis of the proposed micro manipulator were introduced. A prototype of the manipulator was manufactured and its hardware verification procedures were carried out using motion capture cameras and surgical navigation registration methodologies. CONCLUSIONS: Following motion training, the assembled macro-micro manipulator was successfully utilised to actuate a microrobot placed inside a manufactured cochlea mockup model.


Subject(s)
Cochlea , Equipment Design , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Cochlea/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Motion , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Biomechanical Phenomena
14.
Hear Res ; 447: 109027, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723386

ABSTRACT

Despite that fact that the cochlear implant (CI) is one of the most successful neuro-prosthetic devices which allows hearing restoration, several aspects still need to be improved. Interactions between stimulating electrodes through current spread occurring within the cochlea drastically limit the number of discriminable frequency channels and thus can ultimately result in poor speech perception. One potential solution relies on the use of new pulse shapes, such as asymmetric pulses, which can potentially reduce the current spread within the cochlea. The present study characterized the impact of changing electrical pulse shapes from the standard biphasic symmetric to the asymmetrical shape by quantifying the evoked firing rate and the spatial activation in the guinea pig primary auditory cortex (A1). At a fixed charge, the firing rate and the spatial activation in A1 decreased by 15 to 25 % when asymmetric pulses were used to activate the auditory nerve fibers, suggesting a potential reduction of the spread of excitation inside the cochlea. A strong "polarity-order" effect was found as the reduction was more pronounced when the first phase of the pulse was cathodic with high amplitude. These results suggest that the use of asymmetrical pulse shapes in clinical settings can potentially reduce the channel interactions in CI users.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Animals , Guinea Pigs , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Cochlear Nerve/physiopathology , Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlea/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Action Potentials , Female
15.
Hear Res ; 447: 109023, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733710

ABSTRACT

Limited auditory input, whether caused by hearing loss or by electrical stimulation through a cochlear implant (CI), can be compensated by the remaining senses. Specifically for CI users, previous studies reported not only improved visual skills, but also altered cortical processing of unisensory visual and auditory stimuli. However, in multisensory scenarios, it is still unclear how auditory deprivation (before implantation) and electrical hearing experience (after implantation) affect cortical audiovisual speech processing. Here, we present a prospective longitudinal electroencephalography (EEG) study which systematically examined the deprivation- and CI-induced alterations of cortical processing of audiovisual words by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) in postlingually deafened CI users before and after implantation (five weeks and six months of CI use). A group of matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners served as controls. The participants performed a word-identification task with congruent and incongruent audiovisual words, focusing their attention on either the visual (lip movement) or the auditory speech signal. This allowed us to study the (top-down) attention effect on the (bottom-up) sensory cortical processing of audiovisual speech. When compared to the NH listeners, the CI candidates (before implantation) and the CI users (after implantation) exhibited enhanced lipreading abilities and an altered cortical response at the N1 latency range (90-150 ms) that was characterized by a decreased theta oscillation power (4-8 Hz) and a smaller amplitude in the auditory cortex. After implantation, however, the auditory-cortex response gradually increased and developed a stronger intra-modal connectivity. Nevertheless, task efficiency and activation in the visual cortex was significantly modulated in both groups by focusing attention on the visual as compared to the auditory speech signal, with the NH listeners additionally showing an attention-dependent decrease in beta oscillation power (13-30 Hz). In sum, these results suggest remarkable deprivation effects on audiovisual speech processing in the auditory cortex, which partially reverse after implantation. Although even experienced CI users still show distinct audiovisual speech processing compared to NH listeners, pronounced effects of (top-down) direction of attention on (bottom-up) audiovisual processing can be observed in both groups. However, NH listeners but not CI users appear to show enhanced allocation of cognitive resources in visually as compared to auditory attended audiovisual speech conditions, which supports our behavioural observations of poorer lipreading abilities and reduced visual influence on audition in NH listeners as compared to CI users.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Attention , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Electroencephalography , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Photic Stimulation , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Adult , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Aged , Visual Perception , Lipreading , Time Factors , Hearing , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials
16.
Hear Res ; 447: 109024, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735179

ABSTRACT

Delayed loss of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation is a common but poorly understood phenomenon due to the scarcity of relevant temporal bone tissues. Prior histopathological analysis of one case of post-implantation hearing loss suggested there were no interaural differences in hair cell or neural degeneration to explain the profound loss of low-frequency hearing on the implanted side (Quesnel et al., 2016) and attributed the threshold elevation to neo-ossification and fibrosis around the implant. Here we re-evaluated the histopathology in this case, applying immunostaining and improved microscopic techniques for differentiating surviving hair cells from supporting cells. The new analysis revealed dramatic interaural differences, with a > 80 % loss of inner hair cells in the cochlear apex on the implanted side, which can account for the post-implantation loss of residual hearing. Apical degeneration of the stria further contributed to threshold elevation on the implanted side. In contrast, spiral ganglion cell survival was reduced in the region of the electrode on the implanted side, but apical counts in the two ears were similar to that seen in age-matched unimplanted control ears. Almost none of the surviving auditory neurons retained peripheral axons throughout the basal half of the cochlea. Relevance to cochlear implant performance is discussed.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Spiral Ganglion , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Spiral Ganglion/pathology , Spiral Ganglion/physiopathology , Hair Cells, Auditory, Inner/pathology , Time Factors , Cell Survival , Male , Hearing , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/pathology , Hearing Loss/surgery , Hearing Loss/etiology , Female , Hair Cells, Auditory/pathology , Aged , Nerve Degeneration , Middle Aged , Temporal Bone/pathology , Temporal Bone/surgery
17.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): 521-528, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728554

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate a system for otomicrosurgery based on 4K three-dimensional (3D) exoscope technology and apply it to cochlear implantation. METHODS: An open stereoscopic vision-based surgical system, which differs from traditional surgical microscopes, was created by utilizing 4K stereo imaging technology and combining it with low-latency 4K ultra-high-definition 3D display. The system underwent evaluation based on 57 cochlear implantation operations, three designed microscopic manipulations, and a questionnaire survey. RESULTS: The surgical images displayed by the 4K-3D exoscope system (4K-3D-ES) are stereoscopic, clear, and smooth. The use of 4K-3D-ES in cochlear implantation is not inferior to traditional microscopes in terms of intraoperative bleeding and surgical complications, and the surgical duration is not slower or may even be faster than when using traditional microscopes. The results of micromanipulation experiments conducted on 16 students also confirmed this and demonstrated that 4K-3D-ES can be easily adapted. Furthermore, additional advantages of 4K-3D-ES were gathered. Significantly enlarged and high-definition stereoscopic images contribute to the visualization of finer anatomical microstructures such as chordae tympani, ensuring safer surgery. Users feel more comfortable in their necks, shoulders, waists, and backs. Real-time shared stereoscopic view for multiple people, convenient for collaboration and teaching. The ear endoscope and 4K-3D-ES enable seamless switching on the same screen. High-definition 3D images and videos can be saved with just one click, making future publication and communication convenient. CONCLUSION: The feasibility and safety of 4K-3D-ES for cochlear implantation surgery have been demonstrated. The 4K-3D-ES also offers numerous unique advantages and holds clinical application and promotional value.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Male , Female , Child , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Microsurgery/methods , Microsurgery/instrumentation , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Infant
18.
Hear Res ; 448: 109020, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763034

ABSTRACT

Combining cochlear implants with binaural acoustic hearing via preserved hearing in the implanted ear(s) is commonly referred to as combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). EAS fittings can provide patients with significant benefit for speech recognition in complex noise, perceived listening difficulty, and horizontal-plane localization as compared to traditional bimodal hearing conditions with contralateral and monaural acoustic hearing. However, EAS benefit varies across patients and the degree of benefit is not reliably related to the underlying audiogram. Previous research has indicated that EAS benefit for speech recognition in complex listening scenarios and localization is significantly correlated with the patients' binaural cue sensitivity, namely interaural time differences (ITD). In the context of pure tones, interaural phase differences (IPD) and ITD can be understood as two perspectives on the same phenomenon. Through simple mathematical conversion, one can be transformed into the other, illustrating their inherent interrelation for spatial hearing abilities. However, assessing binaural cue sensitivity is not part of a clinical assessment battery as psychophysical tasks are time consuming, require training to achieve performance asymptote, and specialized programming and software all of which render this clinically unfeasible. In this study, we investigated the possibility of using an objective measure of binaural cue sensitivity by the acoustic change complex (ACC) via imposition of an IPD of varying degrees at stimulus midpoint. Ten adult listeners with normal hearing were assessed on tasks of behavioral and objective binaural cue sensitivity for carrier frequencies of 250 and 1000 Hz. Results suggest that 1) ACC amplitude increases with IPD; 2) ACC-based IPD sensitivity for 250 Hz is significantly correlated with behavioral ITD sensitivity; 3) Participants were more sensitive to IPDs at 250 Hz as compared to 1000 Hz. Thus, this objective measure of IPD sensitivity may hold clinical application for pre- and post-operative assessment for individuals meeting candidacy indications for cochlear implantation with low-frequency acoustic hearing preservation as this relatively quick and objective measure may provide clinicians with information identifying patients most likely to derive benefit from EAS technology.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Cues , Sound Localization , Speech Perception , Humans , Female , Male , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Adult , Middle Aged , Electric Stimulation , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Time Factors , Aged , Noise/adverse effects , Perceptual Masking , Young Adult , Hearing , Psychoacoustics
19.
Hear Res ; 448: 109026, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776706

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implants are medical devices that have restored hearing to approximately one million people around the world. Outcomes are impressive and most recipients attain excellent speech comprehension in quiet without relying on lip-reading cues, but pitch resolution is poor compared to normal hearing. Amplitude modulation of electrical stimulation is a primary cue for pitch perception in cochlear implant users. The experiments described in this article focus on the relationship between sensitivity to amplitude modulations and pitch resolution based on changes in the frequency of amplitude modulations. In the first experiment, modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution were measured in adults with no known hearing loss and in cochlear implant users with sounds presented to and processed by their clinical devices. Stimuli were amplitude-modulated sinusoids and amplitude-modulated narrow-band noises. Modulation detection and modulation frequency discrimination were measured for modulation frequencies centered on 110, 220, and 440 Hz. Pitch resolution based on changes in modulation frequency was measured for modulation depths of 25 %, 50 %, 100 %, and for a half-waved rectified modulator. Results revealed a strong linear relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution for cochlear implant users and peers with no known hearing loss. In the second experiment, cochlear implant users took part in analogous procedures of modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution but bypassing clinical sound processing using single-electrode stimulation. Results indicated that modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution was better conveyed by single-electrode stimulation than by clinical processors. Results at 440 Hz were worse, but also not well conveyed by clinical sound processing, so it remains unclear whether the 300 Hz perceptual limit described in the literature is a technological or biological limitation. These results highlight modulation depth and sensitivity as critical factors for pitch resolution in cochlear implant users and characterize the relationship that should inform the design of modulation enhancement algorithms for cochlear implants.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Pitch Perception , Humans , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Male , Female , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Cues , Young Adult , Speech Perception , Pitch Discrimination , Auditory Threshold , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing
20.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(5): 3101-3117, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722101

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implant (CI) users often report being unsatisfied by music listening through their hearing device. Vibrotactile stimulation could help alleviate those challenges. Previous research has shown that musical stimuli was given higher preference ratings by normal-hearing listeners when concurrent vibrotactile stimulation was congruent in intensity and timing with the corresponding auditory signal compared to incongruent. However, it is not known whether this is also the case for CI users. Therefore, in this experiment, we presented 18 CI users and 24 normal-hearing listeners with five melodies and five different audio-to-tactile maps. Each map varied the congruence between the audio and tactile signals related to intensity, fundamental frequency, and timing. Participants were asked to rate the maps from zero to 100, based on preference. It was shown that almost all normal-hearing listeners, as well as a subset of the CI users, preferred tactile stimulation, which was congruent with the audio in intensity and timing. However, many CI users had no difference in preference between timing aligned and timing unaligned stimuli. The results provide evidence that vibrotactile music enjoyment enhancement could be a solution for some CI users; however, more research is needed to understand which CI users can benefit from it most.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implants , Music , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Auditory Perception/physiology , Young Adult , Patient Preference , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Touch Perception/physiology , Vibration , Touch
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL