Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 780
Filter
1.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241261480, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38887094

ABSTRACT

This multi-center study examined the safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation of children between 9 and 11 months of age. The intended impact was to support practice regarding candidacy assessment and prognostic counseling of pediatric cochlear implant candidates. Data in the clinical chart of children implanted at 9-11 months of age with Cochlear Ltd devices at five cochlear implant centers in the United States and Canada were included in analyses. The study included data from two cohorts implanted with one or two Nucleus devices during the periods of January 1, 2012-December 31, 2017 (Cohort 1, n = 83) or between January 1, 2018 and May 15, 2020 (Cohort 2, n = 50). Major adverse events (requiring another procedure/hospitalization) and minor adverse events (managed with medication alone or underwent an expected course of treatment that did not require surgery or hospitalization) out to 2 years post-implant were monitored and outcomes measured by audiometric thresholds and parent-reports on the IT-MAIS and LittlEARS questionnaires were collected. Results revealed 60 adverse events in 41 children and 227 ears implanted (26%) of which 14 major events occurred in 11 children; all were transitory and resolved. Improved hearing with cochlear implant use was shown in all outcome measures. Findings reveal that the procedure is safe for infants and that they show clear benefits of cochlear implantation including increased audibility and hearing development.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Infant , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Male , Female , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Canada , United States , Time Factors , Retrospective Studies , Auditory Threshold , Postoperative Complications
2.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(6): e460-e467, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865720

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Misplacement of electrode arrays in the internal auditory canal (IAC) presents a unique clinical challenge. Speech recognition is limited for cochlear implant (CI) users with misplaced arrays, and there are risks with revision surgery including facial and/or cochlear nerve injury. DATABASES REVIEWED: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. METHODS: A literature search was performed from inception to September 2023. The search terms were designed to capture articles on misplaced arrays and the management options. Articles written in English that described cases of array misplacement into the IAC for children and adults were included. The level of evidence was assessed using Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine guidelines. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight cases of arrays misplaced in the IAC were identified. Thirteen (46%) were patients with incomplete partition type 3 (IP3), and 7 (25%) were patients with common cavity (CC) malformations. Most misplaced arrays were identified postoperatively (19 cases; 68%). Of these cases, 11 (58%) were managed with array removal. No facial nerve injuries were reported with revision surgery. Eight cases (42%) were left in place. Several underwent mapping procedures in an attempt improve the sound quality with the CI. CONCLUSION: Electrode array misplacement in the IAC is a rare complication that reportedly occurs predominately in cases with IP3 and CC malformations. Removal of misplaced arrays from the IAC reportedly has not been associated with facial nerve injuries. Cases identified with IAC misplacement postoperatively can potentially be managed with modified mapping techniques before proceeding with revision surgery.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Ear, Inner , Humans , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Ear, Inner/surgery , Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
3.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 144(3): 159-167, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In temporal bone specimens from long-term cochlear implant users, foreign body response within the cochlea has been demonstrated. However, how hearing changes after implantation and fibrosis progresses within the cochlea is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the short-term dynamic changes in hearing and cochlear histopathology in minipigs after electrode array insertion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve minipigs were selected for electrode array insertion (EAI) and the Control. Hearing tests were performed preoperatively and on 0, 7, 14, and 28 day(s) postoperatively, and cochlear histopathology was performed after the hearing tests on 7, 14, and 28 days after surgery. RESULTS: Electrode array insertion had a significant effect for the frequency range tested (1 kHz-20kHz). Exudation was evident one week after electrode array insertion; at four weeks postoperatively, a fibrous sheath formed around the electrode. At each time point, the endolymphatic hydrops was found; no significant changes in the morphology and packing density of the spiral ganglion neurons were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The effect of electrode array insertion on hearing and intracochlear fibrosis was significant. The process of fibrosis and endolymphatic hydrops seemed to not correlate with the degree of hearing loss, nor did it affect spiral ganglion neuron integrity in the 4-week postoperative period.


Subject(s)
Cochlea , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Swine, Miniature , Animals , Swine , Cochlea/pathology , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Fibrosis , Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects
4.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(3): 476-479, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591281

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To analyse the demographic and clinical variables in children having undergone cochlear implant surgery because of deafness. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from January to November 2022 at the Centre for Research in Experimental and Applied Medicine laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, in collaboration with the Ear, Nose and Throat Department of Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, and comprised children of eith gender aged up to 10 years who had received cochlear implant. Data was collected through questionnaire-based detailed interviews. Syndromic Hearing Loss, Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss, and Acquired Hearing Loss were identified among the subjects. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Of the 250 cases, 147(58.8%) were boys, 146(58.4%) were aged 0-5 years, 219(87.6%) had prelingual onset of disease, and 202(80.8%) had a non-progressive disease course. In 203(81.2%) cases, normal developmental milestones were seen. Parental consanguinity was observed in 219(87.6%) cases. However, 63(25.2%) patients had a first-degree relative who had a history of deafness. In 170(68%) cases, hearing loss was hereditary, whereas in 80(32%) it was acquired. Meningitis was the most commonly identified risk factor 55(68.75%). Acquired risk factors and family history had significant association with hearing loss (p<0.05). Speech perception significantly improved in all 219(100%) patients with prelingual hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the cases were found to be male, had a prelingual disease onset and a non-progressive disease course. Family history was a significant factor, while meningitis was the most common acquired cause of hearing loss.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Meningitis , Child , Humans , Male , Female , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/complications , Deafness/epidemiology , Deafness/surgery , Meningitis/complications , Demography
5.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): e400-e405, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573599

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency, treatment, and outcomes of postoperative delayed-onset swelling around cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, nonrandomized group study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS: Among 354 patients (516 ears) who underwent cochlear implantation (CI) at our hospital between May 2009 and October 2022, 329 (472 ears: 138 children [246 ears] and 191 adults [226 ears]) with a follow-up period of >3 months were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical examination and computed tomography of the head were performed. RESULTS: In total, 5.5% (26/472 ears) had a history of delayed-onset swelling around the implant. This complication occurred in 9.8% (24/246 ears) of children and 0.9% (2/226 ears) of adults. The mean time to onset of swelling was 50 (range, 5.5-147) months following CI. In 60% (21/35) of the cases, the cause was unknown, whereas in 25.7% (9/35) and 11.5% (4/35) of cases, it was head trauma and acute inflammation, respectively. Conservative treatment (observation, antibiotics, and/or strong magnetic compression) was adapted in 91.4% (32/35) of cases. After conservative treatment, revision CI surgery was performed in one ear. Additionally, recurrent swelling was observed in 23.1% (6/26 ears) of swelling cases. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that delayed-onset swelling around implants occurs more frequently in children than in adults because of the higher incidence rates of head trauma and acute otitis media in children. In most cases, conservative treatment was adequate; however, careful follow-up is necessary. Our findings can serve as a reference for optimizing care and intervention options after CI.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Edema , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Male , Child , Female , Child, Preschool , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Adolescent , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Middle Aged , Infant , Edema/etiology , Edema/epidemiology , Young Adult , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged, 80 and over
6.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(4): 392-397, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess cochlear implant (CI) sound processor usage over time in children with single-sided deafness (SSD) and identify factors influencing device use. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, chart review study. SETTING: Pediatric tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Children with SSD who received CI between 2014 and 2020. OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome was average daily CI sound processor usage over follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen children with SSD who underwent CI surgery were categorized based on age of diagnosis and surgery timing. Over an average of 4.3-year follow-up, patients averaged 4.6 hours/day of CI usage. Declining usage trends were noted over time, with the first 2 years postactivation showing higher rates. No significant usage differences emerged based on age, surgery timing, or hearing loss etiology. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term usage decline necessitates further research into barriers and enablers for continued CI use in pediatric SSD cases.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Sound Localization , Speech Perception , Humans , Child , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Sound Localization/physiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome
7.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0301032, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38547135

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A combined vestibular (VI) and cochlear implant (CI) device, also known as the vestibulocochlear implant (VCI), was previously developed to restore both vestibular and auditory function. A new refined prototype is currently being investigated. This prototype allows for concurrent multichannel vestibular and cochlear stimulation. Although recent studies showed that VCI stimulation enables compensatory eye, body and neck movements, the constraints in these acute study designs prevent them from creating more general statements over time. Moreover, the clinical relevance of potential VI and CI interactions is not yet studied. The VertiGO! Trial aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of prolonged daily motion modulated stimulation with a multichannel VCI prototype. METHODS: A single-center clinical trial will be carried out to evaluate prolonged VCI stimulation, assess general safety and explore interactions between the CI and VI. A single-blind randomized controlled crossover design will be implemented to evaluate the efficacy of three types of stimulation. Furthermore, this study will provide a proof-of-concept for a VI rehabilitation program. A total of minimum eight, with a maximum of 13, participants suffering from bilateral vestibulopathy and severe sensorineural hearing loss in the ear to implant will be included and followed over a five-year period. Efficacy will be evaluated by collecting functional (i.e. image stabilization) and more fundamental (i.e. vestibulo-ocular reflexes, self-motion perception) outcomes. Hearing performance with a VCI and patient-reported outcomes will be included as well. DISCUSSION: The proposed schedule of fitting, stimulation and outcome testing allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the feasibility and long-term safety of a multichannel VCI prototype. This design will give insights into vestibular and hearing performance during VCI stimulation. Results will also provide insights into the expected daily benefit of prolonged VCI stimulation, paving the way for cost-effectiveness analyses and a more comprehensive clinical implementation of vestibulocochlear stimulation in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04918745. Registered 28 April 2021.


Subject(s)
Bilateral Vestibulopathy , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Cross-Over Studies
8.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 179: 111932, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537448

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Assess the feasibility of cochlear implantation as day-surgery in children and identify variables influencing admission, readmission, and unplanned postoperative consultation. METHODS: This retrospective observational monocentric study was conducted according to the STROBE recommendations. Between January 2017 and July 2022, all medical records of children who underwent cochlear implantation were analyzed. Eligible children were admitted for the first time to the pediatric day-surgery unit. Exclusion criteria were children planned for inpatient procedure, bilateralization or explantation-reimplantation. Sex assigned at birth, analgesic medication, anesthesia and complications were related to categorical variables. Age, duration of anesthesia, length of stay and ASA score were related to continuous variables. RESULTS: We included 66 children from a total of 106. Mean age was 53 months [SD: 46 months, range 8-184 months]. Successful day-surgery management was observed in 86% of cases. In 14% of cases, children were admitted to the pediatric ENT unit for the following reasons: late awakening in 6%, non-controlled pain in 4.5%, postoperative nausea and vomiting in 3.5% of cases. Univariate analysis did not observe any factor promoting success of day-surgery regarding anesthetic agents. Age was not statistically significant as a factor of ambulatory failure. Time spent in the operating room was not a determining factor (p = 0.559). None of the children were rehospitalized. Early unplanned consultations were observed in 3% of cases for vertex edema in 1 case and uncomplicated otorrhea in 1 case. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the knowledge on pediatric cochlear implantation and suggests that this procedure is suitable for day-surgery at any age.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Otolaryngology , Infant, Newborn , Child , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
9.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 103(1_suppl): 130S-133S, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38488157

ABSTRACT

Viruses are often implicated as a cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), particularly sudden cases, including COVID-19. Determining the viral mechanism that leads to hearing loss is necessary for its future prevention and treatment. The 47-year-old woman who is the subject of this case study presented with sudden SNHL following multiple infections of COVID-19. Following a trial of a contralateral routing of sound device, she received a right cochlear implant (CI). Following a period of high performance, additional cases of COVID-19 infection and device failure issues resulted in the explant/reimplant of 1 ear and implantation of the contralateral ear. Despite extensive rehabilitation after these events, the patient continues to experience difficulties in speech understanding, not reaching her initial high levels of right ear performance. Further research is needed to determine the implications of COVID-19 as it relates to SNHL. This case study aimed to highlight the course of treatment and provide insight into the impact of COVID-19 on sudden hearing loss and its relationship to CI performance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Humans , Female , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/virology , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , SARS-CoV-2 , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/surgery , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/etiology
10.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 37(3): 220-225, 2024 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545833

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With cochlear implantation becoming increasingly performed worldwide, an understanding of the risk factors, preventive measures, and management of cochlear implant (CI) infection remains important given the significant morbidity and cost it conveys. RECENT FINDINGS: At the turn of the 21st century there was a decrease in rates of CI infection, particularly meningitis, following the discontinuation of positioner use for CI. However, in more recent years rates of CI infection have remained largely static. Recently, studies evaluating preventive measures such as pneumococcal vaccination, S. aureus decolonization and surgical antibiotic prophylaxis have emerged in the literature. SUMMARY: Prompt recognition of CI infection and appropriate investigation and management are key, however at present treatment is largely informed by cohort and case-control studies and expert opinion. Preventive measures including pneumococcal vaccination, S. aureus decolonization and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis play a role in reducing rates of CI infection. However, there remains a need for well designed clinical trials to provide higher level evidence to better guide preventive measures for, and management decisions of, CI infections in the future.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Cochlear Implants/microbiology , Risk Factors , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control
11.
J Int Adv Otol ; 20(1): 89-93, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454296

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implantation has become a standard of care for a child diagnosed with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss with a structured surgical standard operating procedure. A 3-year-old boy with bilateral profound prelingual sensorineural deafness underwent a Med-EL Sonata Ti100 implant. We faced a peculiar situation intraoperatively after inserting the electrodes and closing the wound. The impedance recording indicated high ground path impedance with short-circuiting of few electrodes. As a bionic implant, its electronic components may at times malfunction both intraoperatively and/or postoperatively; therefore, neural response telemetry (NRT) was invented to check it. By using NRT and a few milliliters of normal saline, we were able to diagnose as well as rectify the malfunctioning of the implant.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Child, Preschool , Humans , Male , Cochlea/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Saline Solution , Telemetry/methods
12.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(4): 352-361, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361317

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if cochlear implant (CI) is safe and effective in patients with radiation therapy (XRT)-induced sensorineural hearing loss and to discuss considerations in this population through a retrospective cohort review, systematic review, and meta-analysis. DATABASES REVIEWED: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all CI cases after head and neck (HN) XRT at our institution, noting intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and hearing outcomes. Change in speech discrimination scores (SDSs) was the primary outcome measure. Systematic review was performed to identify all cases of CI after HNXRT. A meta-analysis was performed to assess SDS change. RESULTS: The retrospective cohort review identified 12 patients who underwent CI after HNXRT. One patient with HN cancer (HNC) and one with central nervous system pathology (CNSP) received bilateral implants. Six had HNC, three had CNSP, and one had Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Eleven had abnormal findings during CI. There were no postoperative complications. Twenty articles with an additional 97 patients were suitable for systematic review inclusion. Of the 109 patients, 67 (61.5%) had HNC and 18 (16.5%) had CNSP. Abnormal intraoperative findings were common (30.3%), most frequently in the mastoid (66.7%). Postoperative complications, including wound dehiscence and infection with some requiring explantation, occurred in 10.1% of patients. Sixty-six patients were included in the meta-analysis. All demonstrated SDS improvement (mean increase, 56.2%). CONCLUSION: Patients with prior HNXRT benefit from CI. Paying careful attention to surgical planning and technique, postoperative care, and patient expectations is imperative, as complications are not uncommon.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology
13.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 75(1): 17-22, ene.-feb. 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-229267

ABSTRACT

Background Acute mastoiditis (AM) is the most common complication of acute otitis media and primarily affects children under the age of two; current data on its prevalence in paediatric patients with cochlear implant (CI) are still scant. Proper management of AM in CI children is crucial in order to avoid the implications (financial and emotional) of an explant. Aim of this paper is to describe the cases of AM occurred among young patients with CI in follow up at our department, also in order to evaluate its prevalence, potential predisposing factors, clinical course and therapeutic strategies. Patients and methods Retrospective study. Medical records of all paediatric patients with CI, who had at least one year of follow-up, were searched aiming to identify those who developed AM, from January 1st 2002 to January 31st 2022. The following data were collected and analysed: demographic features, implant type and side, interval between CI surgery and AM, treatment, laboratory tests, clinical course, vaccination history, associated diseases. Results AM was developed by six (1.3%) of the 439 children with CI (541 implanted ears). In total, 9 episodes (2.05 %) were recorded, as three patients reported two consecutive infections. Average time interval between CI surgery, to the first or only AM diagnosis, was 13.8 months (range 3–30 months). Furthermore, 3/6 of patients had a history of recurrent acute otitis media; 2/6 an autism spectrum disorder, associated to a combined immune deficiency in one case. All patients were hospitalized and promptly treated by intravenous antibiotic therapy; 4/6 also underwent a mastoidectomy. CI was not explanted in any cases of this series. Conclusions Over a 20-year period, AM rate in CI children was 1.3%, which is consistent with the current literature rates of 1–4.7%. All cases were successfully treated, preserving the integrity of the device. ... (AU)


Introducción La mastoiditis aguda (MA) es la complicación más común de la otitis media aguda y afecta principalmente los niños menores de dos años; los datos actuales sobre su prevalencia en pacientes pediátricos con implante coclear (IC) son aún escasos. El manejo adecuado de la MA en los niños con IC es crucial para evitar las implicaciones (económicas y emocionales) de un explante. El objetivo de este articulo es describir los casos de MA ocurridos en pacientes jóvenes con IC en seguimiento en nuestro servicio, también para evaluar su prevalencia, posibles factores predisponentes, curso clínico y estrategias terapéuticas. Pacientes y métodos Estudio retrospectivo. Se realizaron búsquedas en las historias clínicas de todos los pacientes pediátricos con IC, que tenían al menos un año de seguimiento, con el objetivo de identificar a aquellos que desarrollaron la MA, desde el 1 de enero de 2002 hasta el 31 de enero de 2022. Se recopilaron y analizaron los siguientes datos: características demográficas, tipo de implante y lado, intervalo entre cirugia del IC y MA, tratamiento, exámenes de laboratorio, evolución clínica, antecedentes vacunales, enfermedades asociadas. Resultados La MA fue desarrollada por seis (1,3%) de los 439 niños con IC (541 oídos implantados). En total se registraron 9 episodios (2,05 %), ya que tres pacientes reportaron dos infecciones consecutivas. El intervalo de tiempo promedio entre la cirugía del IC y el primer o único diagnóstico de la MA fue de 13,8 meses (rango 3-30 meses). Además, 3/6 de los pacientes tenían antecedentes de otitis media aguda recurrente; 2/6 un trastorno del espectro autista, asociado a una inmunodeficiencia combinada en un caso. Todos los pacientes fueron hospitalizados y tratados de inmediato con terapia antibiótica intravenosa; 4/6 también se sometieron a una mastoidectomía. El IC no fue explantado en ningún caso de esta serie. Conclusiones ... (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Mastoiditis/complications , Mastoiditis/diagnosis , Mastoiditis/therapy , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Pediatrics , General Surgery , Italy
14.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 75(1): 23-30, ene.-feb. 2024. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-229268

ABSTRACT

Introducción El umbral de confort máximo o maximum comfort level (MCL), umbral eléctrico o threshold level (THR) e impedancia eléctrica cambian en el postoperatorio del implante coclear durante meses hasta estabilizarse. El objetivo de este artículo es establecer la variación durante cinco años posquirúrgicos de la impedancia, y su relación con MCL en adultos implantados unilateralmente. Métodos Estudio retrospectivo a cinco años, con 78 pacientes adultos implantados con MED-EL en un hospital terciario desde el año 2000 hasta 2015. Se analizó la variación de impedancia, MCL y relación entre ellos, en electrodos basales (9-12), medios (5-8) y apicales (1-4), realizando análisis inferencial ANOVA de medidas repetidas con comparaciones entre tiempos consecutivos, corregidas con criterio Bonferroni. Resultados Treinta y tres hombres (42,3%) y 45 mujeres (57,7%), con edad media 52,7 ± 14,6 años. Se consideró «estabilidad» el momento del seguimiento sin diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre una visita y la siguiente. Los cambios en la impedancia en electrodos medios dejaron de ser estadísticamente significativos a los tres meses, y en apicales a los seis meses, con valores medios de 5,84 y 6,43 kohms. MCL se estabilizó a los dos años en electrodos basales y apicales, y a los tres años en medios, con valores medios de 24,9, 22,7 y 25,6 qu. Hubo correlación entre MCL e impedancia en electrodos medios hasta 3 meses y en apicales hasta un año. Conclusiones La impedancia eléctrica desciende significativamente en electrodos medios y apicales hasta tres y seis meses. El MCL aumenta significativamente hasta dos años. La impedancia se relaciona con MCL hasta seis meses. (AU)


Introduction The maximum comfort level (MCL), threshold level (THR) and electrical impedance change in the postoperative period of the cochlear implant for months until they stabilize. The objective of this article is to establish the variation during 5 post-surgical years of impedance, and its relationship with MCL in unilaterally implanted adults. Methods Retrospective study over 5 years, with 78 adult patients implanted with MED-EL in a tertiary hospital from the year 2000 to 2015. The variation in impedance, MCL and the relationship between them were analyzed in basal (9-12), medial (5-8) and apical electrodes (1-4), performing an inferential ANOVA analysis of repeated measures with comparisons between consecutive times, corrected with Bonferroni criteria. Results 33 men (42.3%) and 45 women (57.7%), with a mean age of 52.7 ± 14.6 years. “Stability” was considered the time of follow-up without statistically significant differences between one visit and the next. Changes in impedance in medial electrodes ceased to be statistically significant at 3 months, and in apicals at 6 months, with mean values of 5.84 and 6.43 kohms. MCL stabilized at 2 years in basal and apical electrodes, and at 3 years in medial, with mean values of 24.9, 22.7, and 25.6 qu. There was a correlation between MCL and impedance in medium electrodes up to 3 months and in apical ones up to one year. Conclusions Electrical impedance drops significantly in medial and apical electrodes up to 3 and 6 months. MCL increases significantly up to two years. Impedance is related to MCL up to 6 months. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Electric Impedance , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Telemetry , Retrospective Studies
15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220047

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to assess clinical safety and postoperative audiological outcomes in postlingual deafness Spanish speaking patients, who underwent surgery with Nurotron™ cochlear implant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective descriptive case series study. We performed follow-up of complications and audiological measurements before and after cochlear implantation. Patients with bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss or patients with unilateral deafness with/without tinnitus were included. Repeated-measures within-subjects for assess pure tone thresholds and speech performance (bilingual test) with a detailed monitoring to establish security or adverse effects were performed. Analysis of variance tests, repetitive measures, were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 31 patients were included, 17 (54.8%) men and 14 (45.2%) women. Mean age at the time of surgery was 49.82 ± 18.8 years. The mean follow-up of the group was 31.56 ± 9.57 months (minimum = 19.6 months and maximum = 52.50 months). As major complication one patient (3.23%) had a hard failure that required removal and re-implantation. 25.8% of the patients presented minor complications, the most frequent being vertigo/unsteadiness in 22.6%. The mean of language discrimination (free field at 65 dB SPL) was 62.19% ± 16.66; being 69.82% ± 7.35 in the group of severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. A statistically significant reduction was observed in patients with tinnitus, assessed using the visual analogue scale, preoperative = 7.2 ± 1,6 vs postoperative (18months postoperative) = 1.7 ± 1.3 (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The Nurotron™ cochlear implant shows satisfactory audiological results, in accordance with what has been reported in the literature. Minor complications were similar to previous studies, but the percentage of hard failure should continue to be observed, which was higher than other reports with comparable follow-up.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Adult , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Aged , Cochlear Implantation , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Language , Follow-Up Studies , Deafness/surgery , Prosthesis Design , Tinnitus/etiology
16.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(3): 245-255, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38270168

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: Trauma to the osseous spiral lamina (OSL) or spiral ligament (SL) during cochlear implant (CI) insertion segregates with electrode type and induces localized intracochlear ossification and fibrosis. BACKGROUND: The goal of atraumatic CI insertion is to preserve intracochlear structures, limit reactive intracochlear tissue formation, and preserve residual hearing. Previous qualitative studies hypothesized a localized effect of trauma on intracochlear tissue formation; however, quantitative studies failed to confirm this. METHODS: Insertional trauma beyond the immediate insertion site was histologically assessed in 21 human temporal bones with a CI. Three-dimensional reconstructions were generated and virtually resectioned perpendicular to the cochlear spiral at high resolution. The cochlear volume occupied by ossification or fibrosis was determined at the midpoint of the trauma and compared with regions proximal and distal to this point. RESULTS: Seven cases, all implanted with precurved electrodes, showed an OSL fracture beyond the immediate insertion site. Significantly more intracochlear ossification was observed at the midpoint of the OSL fracture, compared with the -26 to -18 degrees proximal and 28 to 56 degrees distal to the center. No such pattern was observed for fibrosis. In the 12 cases with a perforation of the SL (9 straight and 3 precurved electrodes), no localized pattern of ossification or fibrosis was observed around these perforations. CONCLUSION: OSL fractures were observed exclusively with precurved electrodes in this study and may serve as a nidus for localized intracochlear ossification. Perforation of the SL, in contrast, predominantly occurred with straight electrodes and was not associated with localized ossification.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Osteogenesis , Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlea/diagnostic imaging , Cochlea/surgery , Cochlea/injuries , Temporal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Temporal Bone/surgery , Temporal Bone/pathology , Fibrosis
17.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(5): 2313-2325, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180606

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hypothesis that day-case cochlear implantation is associated with equal quality of life, hearing benefits and complications rates, compared to inpatient cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, non-blinded, randomized controlled, equivalence trial in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Thirty adult patients with post-lingual bilateral sensorineural hearing loss eligible for unilateral cochlear implantation surgery were randomly assigned to either the day-case or inpatient treatment group. The effect on general quality of life, patient satisfaction, (subjective) hearing improvement, postoperative complications and causes of crossover and/or readmission were assessed using questionnaires, auditory evaluations and patients' charts over a follow-up period of 1 year. RESULTS: Overall quality of life measured by the HUI3 was equal between the day-case (n = 14) and inpatient group (n = 14). The overall patients' satisfaction showed a slight favor towards an inpatient approach. There was no significant difference in the subjective and objective hearing improvement between both treatment groups. During the 1-year follow-up period no major complications occurred. Minor complications occurred intraoperatively in three day-case patients resulting in three out of nine admissions of day-case patients. Other causes of admission of day-case patients were nausea and vomiting (n = 1), drowsiness (n = 1), late scheduled surgery (n = 2), social reasons (n = 1), or due to an unclear reason (n = 1). No patients required readmission. CONCLUSION: We found equal outcomes of QoL, patient satisfaction, objective, and subjective hearing outcomes between day-case and inpatient unilateral cochlear implantation. Nine out of 14 day-case patients were admitted for at least one night postoperatively (crossover). No major complications occurred in both groups. A day-case approach seems feasible when using specific patient selection, surgical planning and the preoperative provision of patient information into account. Besides this, the familiarity with a day-case approach of both patient and the surgical team can increase the feasibility of day-case surgery.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Adult , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Inpatients , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Hearing , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery
18.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 51(1): 82-85, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37573175

ABSTRACT

Mitochondrial DNA mutations such as A3243G or A1555G are widely reported to cause hearing loss, but few reports exist on the A8296G mutation, which can also cause hearing loss. This report presents the case of a patient with the A8296G mutation and severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) that progressed over two decades. The patient had no history of diabetes, but did have a family history of SNHL in her father and maternal grandmother. She was first diagnosed with SNHL at 45 years of age, and an A8296G mutation was found. The hearing threshold in the low-frequency range of the right ear was preserved at diagnosis, but eventually declined resulting in severe bilateral hearing loss by the age of 66 years, and cochlear implantation (CI) was performed in the left ear. The hearing threshold three months after CI was 25-45 dB HL, and the phoneme speech discrimination score in the left ear improved from 20% without CI to 74% with CI. SNHL patients with the A8295G mutation are good candidates for treatment with CI.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss , Speech Perception , Humans , Female , Aged , Cochlear Implantation/methods , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Hearing Loss/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/genetics , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/complications , Mutation , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects
19.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(3): 1231-1242, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37707616

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Monocentric, prospective study to investigate whether concomitant support of cochlear implant (CI) patients by CI-trained otolaryngologists and application of a standardized head bandage can minimize potential complications during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with 46 CIs underwent MRI with a prophylactic head bandage. All participants and the otolaryngologist at the CI center completed pre- and post-MRI questionnaires documenting body region scanned, duration of MRI and bandage wear, field strength during the scan, and any complications. If pain was experienced, it was assessed using a visual analog scale (1-10). RESULTS: MRI was performed without adverse events in 37.8% of cases. Magnet dislocation requiring surgical revision occurred in 2% of cases. Pain was reported in 86% of cases, often due to the tightness of the dressing. Patients with rotating, MRI-compatible magnets reported significantly less pain than participants with older-generation implants. In 11% of cases, the MRI was discontinued. CONCLUSION: Serious complications during MRI in cochlear implant patients are rare. Pain is the most common adverse event, probably mainly due to the tight bandage required by most implant types. With newer generations of magnets, these patients experience less pain, no dislocation of the magnets, and no need for bandaging. Although magnet dislocation cannot be completely prevented in older generations of implants, it appears to be reduced by good patient management, which recommends examination under the guidance of physicians trained in the use of hearing implants.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Aged , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Pain/etiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Magnets
20.
Laryngoscope ; 134(1): 400-409, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37254944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The co-occurrence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and congenital heart disease (CHD) is a rare condition with complex etiologies. The purpose of this study is to assess the etiologies, clinical features, and outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) in this patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Case series and literature review. METHODS: Clinical data of children who were diagnosed with SNHL and CHD and received CIs at a tertiary hospital from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A literature review was performed to identify patients with SNHL and CHD. FINDINGS: Of the 382 children who underwent cochlear implantation at our center, eight (2.1%) were diagnosed with SNHL and CHD. A literature review identified 1525 patients from 254 studies; the database therefore consisted of 1533 patients. The most common genetic etiologies of co-occurring SNHL and CHD were CHARGE syndrome (36.3%), Turner syndrome (8.4%), 22q11.2 deletion (3.0%), Noonan syndrome (2.9%), and Down syndrome (2.5%), whereas the most common non-genetic etiologies were congenital rubella syndrome (22.9%) and SNHL after early cardiac surgery (5.5%). Most of the patients presented with congenital, bilateral, severe-profound SNHL requiring early rehabilitation. Of the 126 children who received CIs at a median age of 2.5 years, half showed delayed speech development at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Co-occurring SNHL and CHD is a rare condition with complex etiologies. Timely hearing intervention with long-term follow-up and proper timing of heart surgery is essential for these children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4, case series Laryngoscope, 134:400-409, 2024.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Heart Defects, Congenital , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Retrospective Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...