Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.933
Filter
1.
Am Ann Deaf ; 169(1): 57-76, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973463

ABSTRACT

Accessible and inclusive participation in sport can provide significant physical, psychological, and social benefits to Deaf or hard of hearing (D/HH) athletes. To understand how to facilitate these benefits, the researchers explored the lived physical education and sport experiences of D/HH collegiate athletes. Six athletes representing six sports were recruited and interviewed. Utilizing an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach to guide data collection, analysis, and interpretation, the researchers found five major themes: Self-Advocating for Awareness, Finding Meaningful Conversations, Overcoming Challenges, Seeking Community Connection, and Escaping Through Physical Activity. These themes illustrate the influence of accessibility and inclusion on the participants' sport experiences as well as the impact of the disability awareness of their coaches and peers. D/HH athletes and their coaches and teammates should work to overcome barriers to accessibility and inclusion to ensure the maximum benefit of being on a college sports team.


Subject(s)
Persons With Hearing Impairments , Sports for Persons with Disabilities , Humans , Male , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Female , Young Adult , Sports for Persons with Disabilities/psychology , Athletes/psychology , Universities , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Awareness , Adolescent , Students/psychology , Social Inclusion , Physical Education and Training , Sports/psychology , Qualitative Research
3.
Am Ann Deaf ; 169(1): 40-56, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973462

ABSTRACT

The researchers examined the associations between thinking styles and grit. A cross-sectional design was adopted, with two weeks of data collection. The Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II and the Grit Scale were administered to 365 signing deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) Arts and Design students and 443 hearing university students in mainland China. CFA, MANOVA, hierarchical multiple regression analyses, and a multi-group analysis were executed for data analysis. DHH and hearing students with Type I styles (i.e., more creativity-generating, less structured, and cognitively more complex) had higher grit levels, with large effect sizes for the identified relationships. There were no differences in the relations for either group. The associations between thinking styles and grit may protect against psychological pressure and rehabilitation problems and enable university/school administrators, counselors, social workers, teachers, parents, and students to enhance the grit of students who are deaf or hard of hearing.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Students , Thinking , Humans , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Young Adult , Students/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , China , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Creativity , Adult , Education of Hearing Disabled/methods
4.
Am Ann Deaf ; 168(5): 327-346, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766942

ABSTRACT

This single case study concerns an 11-year-old girl, Agata, who recently moved to a rural community in the United States from the Philippines. Agata is profoundly deaf, has had no access to amplification, and has had very limited access to language and formal school. The journey through the next year, including the COVID-19 pandemic, saw Agata's language and literacy skills blossom at an unexpected rate. The study examines the how and why of Agata's progress by using multiple sources of both quantitative and qualitative data. A conceptual framework of both direct instruction theory (Engelmann & Carnine, 1982) and resilience theory (Garmezy, 1993) was used to systematically analyze the factors that contributed to Agata's growth and offer a more thorough understanding of the complex challenges and potential successes in supporting students from Asian communities who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing (d/DHH).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education of Hearing Disabled , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Humans , Child , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/psychology , Philippines/ethnology , Learning , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , Resilience, Psychological
6.
Am Ann Deaf ; 168(5): 274-295, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766939

ABSTRACT

Extant research on learners who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing with disabilities who come from Asian immigrant families is extremely sparse. The authors conducted an intrinsic case study of a deaf student with autism who comes from a Korean immigrant family. To acquire a comprehensive understanding of language and communication characteristics, they analyzed (a) interview data of three administrators who worked with the student and family and (b) school documents/reports issued to the parents. Themes are reported across the three components of the tri-focus framework (Siegel-Causey & Bashinski, 1997): the learner, partner, and environment. Implications for practitioners who work with these learners and their families are discussed, including (a) compiling an individualized language and communication profile that encompasses the framework; (b) utilizing culturally and linguistically responsive practices with the family; (c) practicing interprofessional collaboration; and (d) modifying physical and social environments to increase accessibility.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Deafness , Emigrants and Immigrants , Humans , Autism Spectrum Disorder/psychology , Autism Spectrum Disorder/ethnology , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/ethnology , Male , Communication , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Education of Hearing Disabled , Child , Republic of Korea , Female , Communication Barriers , Sign Language , Social Environment , Language
7.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 180: 111968, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714045

ABSTRACT

AIM & OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude with receptive and expressive language ages in children using cochlear implant (CI) in one ear and a hearing aid (HA) in non-implanted ear. METHODS: The study included 30 children, consisting of 18 males and 12 females, aged between 48 and 96 months. The age at which the children received CI ranged from 42 to 69 months. A within-subject research design was utilized and participants were selected through purposive sampling. Auditory late latency responses (ALLR) were assessed using the Intelligent hearing system to measure P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude. The assessment checklist for speech-language skills (ACSLS) was employed to evaluate receptive and expressive language age. Both assessments were conducted after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: A total of 30 children participated in the study, with a mean implant age of 20.03 months (SD: 8.14 months). The mean P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude was 129.50 ms (SD: 15.05 ms) and 6.93 µV (SD: 2.24 µV) respectively. Correlation analysis revealed no significant association between ALLR measures and receptive or expressive language ages. However, there was significant negative correlation between the P1 latency and implant age (Spearman's rho = -0.371, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that P1 latency which is an indicative of auditory maturation, may not be a reliable marker for predicting language outcomes. It can be concluded that language development is likely to be influenced by other factors beyond auditory maturation alone.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Language Development , Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Reaction Time/physiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Age Factors , Speech Perception/physiology
8.
Hear Res ; 447: 109023, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733710

ABSTRACT

Limited auditory input, whether caused by hearing loss or by electrical stimulation through a cochlear implant (CI), can be compensated by the remaining senses. Specifically for CI users, previous studies reported not only improved visual skills, but also altered cortical processing of unisensory visual and auditory stimuli. However, in multisensory scenarios, it is still unclear how auditory deprivation (before implantation) and electrical hearing experience (after implantation) affect cortical audiovisual speech processing. Here, we present a prospective longitudinal electroencephalography (EEG) study which systematically examined the deprivation- and CI-induced alterations of cortical processing of audiovisual words by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) in postlingually deafened CI users before and after implantation (five weeks and six months of CI use). A group of matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners served as controls. The participants performed a word-identification task with congruent and incongruent audiovisual words, focusing their attention on either the visual (lip movement) or the auditory speech signal. This allowed us to study the (top-down) attention effect on the (bottom-up) sensory cortical processing of audiovisual speech. When compared to the NH listeners, the CI candidates (before implantation) and the CI users (after implantation) exhibited enhanced lipreading abilities and an altered cortical response at the N1 latency range (90-150 ms) that was characterized by a decreased theta oscillation power (4-8 Hz) and a smaller amplitude in the auditory cortex. After implantation, however, the auditory-cortex response gradually increased and developed a stronger intra-modal connectivity. Nevertheless, task efficiency and activation in the visual cortex was significantly modulated in both groups by focusing attention on the visual as compared to the auditory speech signal, with the NH listeners additionally showing an attention-dependent decrease in beta oscillation power (13-30 Hz). In sum, these results suggest remarkable deprivation effects on audiovisual speech processing in the auditory cortex, which partially reverse after implantation. Although even experienced CI users still show distinct audiovisual speech processing compared to NH listeners, pronounced effects of (top-down) direction of attention on (bottom-up) audiovisual processing can be observed in both groups. However, NH listeners but not CI users appear to show enhanced allocation of cognitive resources in visually as compared to auditory attended audiovisual speech conditions, which supports our behavioural observations of poorer lipreading abilities and reduced visual influence on audition in NH listeners as compared to CI users.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Attention , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Electroencephalography , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Photic Stimulation , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Adult , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Aged , Visual Perception , Lipreading , Time Factors , Hearing , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials
9.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 179: 111930, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children may experience communication delays, irrespective of early intervention and technology. Australian Sign Language (Auslan) is one approach in early intervention to address language delays. Current prevalence of Auslan use among Australian families with DHH children is unknown. AIMS: The first aim was to determine the proportion of families enrolled in an Australian statewide hearing loss databank who use Auslan with their DHH child. The second aim was to explore the relationships between indicators of child hearing loss (bilateral or unilateral hearing loss, degree of hearing loss, and device use: hearing aids and cochlear implants), family factors (maternal education, attendance at early intervention, family history of deafness, and socio-economic disadvantage) and the family's reported use of Auslan. METHODS: We analysed the enrolment data from 997 families who participated in an Australian statewide hearing loss databank between 2012 and 2021. We described the proportion of families who used Auslan with their DHH child at home. The association between indicators of child hearing loss and family factors, and the parental reports of communication approach were examined using correlation analyses. RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 997 parents (8.7%) reported using Auslan with their DHH child. Of these, 26 (2.6%) used Auslan as their primary language. The use of Auslan at home was associated with the following indicators of child hearing loss: bilateral hearing loss, profound compared to mild hearing loss, and cochlear implant and hearing aid use compared to no device use. The family factors associated with the use of Auslan were: referral or attendance at early intervention compared to those who did not attend, and a family history of deafness compared to those with none. No association was found between maternal education and socio-economic disadvantage and the use of Auslan. CONCLUSION: This Australian study found a low proportion (8.7%) of families with a DHH child who reported using Auslan. Seven child hearing loss and family factors were considered, and five were significantly associated with using Auslan at home. Children with a greater degree of hearing loss, attendance at early intervention and family history of deafness tended to use Auslan.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Child , Humans , Deafness/epidemiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Australia/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/epidemiology
10.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(4): 104331, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677147

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in music appreciation after cochlear implant (CI) surgery for patients with bilateral and single-sided deafness (SSD). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on all adult CI unilateral or bilateral recipients from November 2019 to March 2023. Musical questionnaire subset data from the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) - 35 Profile Instrument Score (maximum raw score of 15) was collected. Functional CI assessment was measured with CI-alone speech-in-quiet (SIQ) scores (AzBio and CNC). RESULTS: 22 adults underwent CI surgery for SSD and 21 adults for bilateral deafness (8 sequentially implanted). Every patient group had clinically significant improvements (p < 0.001) in mean SIQ scores in the most recently implanted ear (Azbio (% correct) SSD: 14.23 to 68.48, bilateral: 24.54 to 82.23, sequential: 6.25 to 82.57). SSD adults on average had higher music QOL scores at baseline (SSD: 11.05; bilateral: 7.86, p < 0.001). No group had significant increases in raw score at the first post-operative visit (SSD: 11.45, p = 0.86; bilateral: 8.15, p = 0.15). By the most recent post-implantation evaluation (median 12.8 months for SSD, 12.3 months for bilateral), SSD adults had a significant increase in raw score from baseline (11.05 to 12.45, p = 0.03), whereas bilaterally deafened (7.86 to 9.38, p = 0.12) adults had nonsignificant increases. CONCLUSIONS: SSD patients demonstrate higher baseline music appreciation than bilaterally deafened individuals regardless of unilateral or bilateral implantation and are more likely to demonstrate continued improvement in subjective music appreciation at last follow-up even when speech perception outcomes are similar.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Music , Quality of Life , Humans , Music/psychology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Aged , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/surgery , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/psychology , Treatment Outcome
11.
Hear Res ; 446: 109007, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608331

ABSTRACT

Despite the proven effectiveness of cochlear implant (CI) in the hearing restoration of deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) children, to date, extreme variability in verbal working memory (VWM) abilities is observed in both unilateral and bilateral CI user children (CIs). Although clinical experience has long observed deficits in this fundamental executive function in CIs, the cause to date is still unknown. Here, we have set out to investigate differences in brain functioning regarding the impact of monaural and binaural listening in CIs compared with normal hearing (NH) peers during a three-level difficulty n-back task undertaken in two sensory modalities (auditory and visual). The objective of this pioneering study was to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) marker pattern differences in visual and auditory VWM performances in CIs compared to NH peers and possible differences between unilateral cochlear implant (UCI) and bilateral cochlear implant (BCI) users. The main results revealed differences in theta and gamma EEG bands. Compared with hearing controls and BCIs, UCIs showed hypoactivation of theta in the frontal area during the most complex condition of the auditory task and a correlation of the same activation with VWM performance. Hypoactivation in theta was also observed, again for UCIs, in the left hemisphere when compared to BCIs and in the gamma band in UCIs compared to both BCIs and NHs. For the latter two, a correlation was found between left hemispheric gamma oscillation and performance in the audio task. These findings, discussed in the light of recent research, suggest that unilateral CI is deficient in supporting auditory VWM in DHH. At the same time, bilateral CI would allow the DHH child to approach the VWM benchmark for NH children. The present study suggests the possible effectiveness of EEG in supporting, through a targeted approach, the diagnosis and rehabilitation of VWM in DHH children.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Electroencephalography , Memory, Short-Term , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Visual Perception , Humans , Child , Female , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Male , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Theta Rhythm , Photic Stimulation , Gamma Rhythm , Adolescent , Speech Perception , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/surgery , Hearing
12.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 180: 111923, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636180

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Children with cochlear implants exhibit lower phonological awareness and sound discrimination skills compared to their normal-hearing peers. However, music training has been shown to have a positive effect on speech discrimination and awareness skills. METHODS: Our study included 23 cochlear implant users and 23 normal hearing participants aged 5-6 years with language skills. The aim was to observe the effect of a music-integrated phonological awareness program on cochlear implant users and to compare the phonological awareness skills of children with cochlear implants before and after online training with their normal hearing peers. RESULTS: Results showed that the trained study group scored higher on the Scale of Early Childhood Phonological Awareness (PASECP) after training than the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, SMRT scores increased between before and after training in the study group, and Mismatch Negativity (MMN) amplitudes increased and latencies decreased as a result of training (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that phonological awareness training integrated with music can effectively improve the phonological awareness skills of children with cochlear implants and has the potential to enable them to achieve phonological awareness levels similar to or even better than their normal hearing peers.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Humans , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Child , Speech Perception/physiology , Awareness , Case-Control Studies , Phonetics , Music Therapy/methods , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/surgery , Treatment Outcome
13.
Ear Hear ; 45(4): 952-968, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616318

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implants (CIs) have difficulties with perceiving differences in speakers' voice characteristics and benefit little from voice differences for the perception of speech in competing speech. However, not much is known yet about the perception and use of voice characteristics in prelingually deaf implanted children with CIs. Unlike CI adults, most CI children became deaf during the acquisition of language. Extensive neuroplastic changes during childhood could make CI children better at using the available acoustic cues than CI adults, or the lack of exposure to a normal acoustic speech signal could make it more difficult for them to learn which acoustic cues they should attend to. This study aimed to examine to what degree CI children can perceive voice cues and benefit from voice differences for perceiving speech in competing speech, comparing their abilities to those of normal-hearing (NH) children and CI adults. DESIGN: CI children's voice cue discrimination (experiment 1), voice gender categorization (experiment 2), and benefit from target-masker voice differences for perceiving speech in competing speech (experiment 3) were examined in three experiments. The main focus was on the perception of mean fundamental frequency (F0) and vocal-tract length (VTL), the primary acoustic cues related to speakers' anatomy and perceived voice characteristics, such as voice gender. RESULTS: CI children's F0 and VTL discrimination thresholds indicated lower sensitivity to differences compared with their NH-age-equivalent peers, but their mean discrimination thresholds of 5.92 semitones (st) for F0 and 4.10 st for VTL indicated higher sensitivity than postlingually deaf CI adults with mean thresholds of 9.19 st for F0 and 7.19 st for VTL. Furthermore, CI children's perceptual weighting of F0 and VTL cues for voice gender categorization closely resembled that of their NH-age-equivalent peers, in contrast with CI adults. Finally, CI children had more difficulties in perceiving speech in competing speech than their NH-age-equivalent peers, but they performed better than CI adults. Unlike CI adults, CI children showed a benefit from target-masker voice differences in F0 and VTL, similar to NH children. CONCLUSION: Although CI children's F0 and VTL voice discrimination scores were overall lower than those of NH children, their weighting of F0 and VTL cues for voice gender categorization and their benefit from target-masker differences in F0 and VTL resembled that of NH children. Together, these results suggest that prelingually deaf implanted CI children can effectively utilize spectrotemporally degraded F0 and VTL cues for voice and speech perception, generally outperforming postlingually deaf CI adults in comparable tasks. These findings underscore the presence of F0 and VTL cues in the CI signal to a certain degree and suggest other factors contributing to the perception challenges faced by CI adults.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Cues , Deafness , Speech Perception , Humans , Deafness/rehabilitation , Male , Female , Child , Adult , Young Adult , Adolescent , Voice/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Middle Aged
14.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(4): 392-397, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38478407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess cochlear implant (CI) sound processor usage over time in children with single-sided deafness (SSD) and identify factors influencing device use. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, chart review study. SETTING: Pediatric tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Children with SSD who received CI between 2014 and 2020. OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome was average daily CI sound processor usage over follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen children with SSD who underwent CI surgery were categorized based on age of diagnosis and surgery timing. Over an average of 4.3-year follow-up, patients averaged 4.6 hours/day of CI usage. Declining usage trends were noted over time, with the first 2 years postactivation showing higher rates. No significant usage differences emerged based on age, surgery timing, or hearing loss etiology. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term usage decline necessitates further research into barriers and enablers for continued CI use in pediatric SSD cases.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Sound Localization , Speech Perception , Humans , Child , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Sound Localization/physiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome
15.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 179: 111908, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38461681

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to develop a mobile auditory training application based on gaming for children aged 3-5 years using cochlear implants and to evaluate its usability. METHODS: 4 games were developed in the scope of the application World of Sounds; the crucible sound for auditory awareness, mole hunting for auditory discrimination, find the sound for auditory recognition, and choo-choo for auditory comprehension. The prototype was applied to 20 children with normal hearing and 20 children with cochlear implants, all of whom were aged 3-5. The participants were asked to fill out the Game Evaluation Form for Children. Moreover, 40 parents were included in the study, and the Evaluation Form for the Application was applied. RESULTS: According to the form, at least 80% of children using cochlear implants, and all children in the healthy group, responded well to the usability factors. All factors were obtained as highly useable by parents of the children using cochlear implants. The results indicated that in the healthy group, the usefulness and motivation factors were above moderate, and the other factors were highly useable. In the mole-hunting game, there was no significant difference between the groups in the easy level of the first sub-section (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of the other sub-sections of the mole-hunting game and all sub-sections of the crucible sound, find the sound, and the choo-choo games (p < 0.05). While there was no correlation between duration of cochlear implant use and ADSI scores and the third sub-section of the crucible sound game (p > 0.05); a correlation was found in the other sub-sections of crucible sound and all sub-sections of the mole hunting, find the sound, and Choo-Choo games (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is thought that the application World of Sounds can serve as an accessible option to support traditional auditory rehabilitation for children with cochlear implants.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Child , Humans , Auditory Perception , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Deafness/rehabilitation
16.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 155(3): 1694-1703, 2024 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38426839

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implant (CI) is currently the vital technological device for assisting deaf patients in hearing sounds and greatly enhances their sound listening appreciation. Unfortunately, it performs poorly for music listening because of the insufficient number of electrodes and inaccurate identification of music features. Therefore, this study applied source separation technology with a self-adjustment function to enhance the music listening benefits for CI users. In the objective analysis method, this study showed that the results of the source-to-distortion, source-to-interference, and source-to-artifact ratios were 4.88, 5.92, and 15.28 dB, respectively, and significantly better than the Demucs baseline model. For the subjective analysis method, it scored higher than the traditional baseline method VIR6 (vocal to instrument ratio, 6 dB) by approximately 28.1 and 26.4 (out of 100) in the multi-stimulus test with hidden reference and anchor test, respectively. The experimental results showed that the proposed method can benefit CI users in identifying music in a live concert, and the personal self-fitting signal separation method had better results than any other default baselines (vocal to instrument ratio of 6 dB or vocal to instrument ratio of 0 dB) did. This finding suggests that the proposed system is a potential method for enhancing the music listening benefits for CI users.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Deep Learning , Music , Humans , Deafness/rehabilitation , Auditory Perception
17.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ ; 29(3): 377-387, 2024 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330211

ABSTRACT

On average, deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children have difficulty developing expressive spoken vocabulary comparable to hearing peers. Yet, there are no evidence-based practices to guide classroom instruction for teachers of the deaf. Retrieval practice-a robust learning strategy-has been shown to improve children's retention of vocabulary, but it has not been investigated with DHH children who use listening and spoken language. The present study examined whether DHH children benefit from using retrieval practice to learn new vocabulary. Sixteen DHH children (in the age range of 5.0-8.11 years) were taught a set of new vocabulary words using retrieval practice or repeated exposure. A recall test was administered two days later. Results showed that DHH children were twice as likely to recall a word taught through retrieval practice than exposure (OR = 2.01, p = .02). Presence of an additional diagnosis and number of practice trials were also significant predicting factors of vocabulary learning.


Subject(s)
Vocabulary , Humans , Child, Preschool , Child , Female , Male , Mental Recall , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Learning , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Language Development , Education of Hearing Disabled/methods
18.
HNO ; 72(6): 412-422, 2024 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358482

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) clinical practice guideline on cochlear implant (CI) treatment, which was updated in 2020, defined the entire process of CI care for the first time. In the present study, the feasibility and results of very early rehabilitation were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intervention group (IG) comprised 54 patients in whom rehabilitation was initiated within 14 (maximally 28) days after implantation. Patients with a significantly longer waiting time were included in the control group (CG, n = 21). In addition to the start and duration of rehabilitation, the speech intelligibility achieved with CI was recorded at different timepoints within a 12-month period. In addition, questionnaires were used to assess the effort of fitting the CI processor and the patients' satisfaction with the outcome as well as the timing of the start of rehabilitation. RESULTS: Median waiting time between implantation and start of rehabilitation was 14 days in the IG and 106 days in the CG; 92.6% of IG patients were able to start rehabilitation within 14 days. The effect of rehabilitation in the IG was 35 and in the CG 25 percentage points (Freiburg monosyllabic test). After 6 and 12 months of CI use, both groups showed comparable results in the test condition in quiet (IG/CG 6 months: 70%/70%; 12 months: 70%/60%, Freiburg monosyllabic test) and in noise (IG/CG 6 months: -1.1-0.85 dB SNR; 12 months: -0.65 dB SNR/0.3 dB SNR, Oldenburg sentence test). Hearing quality assessment scores collected by SSQ (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) questionnaire showed better scores in the IG at 6 months, which converged to CG scores at 12 months. The IG was significantly more satisfied with the timing of the start of rehab than the CG. All other data obtained from questionnaires showed no differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A very early start of inpatient rehabilitation after cochlear implantation was successfully implemented. The rehabilitation was completed within 7 weeks of CI surgery. Comparison of speech recognition test results before and after rehabilitation showed a significant improvement. A clear rehabilitation effect can therefore be demonstrated. Inclusion of CI rehabilitation in the German catalog of follow-up treatments is thus scientifically justified and therefore strongly recommended.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Germany , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Cochlear Implantation/rehabilitation , Adult , Aftercare/methods , Cochlear Implants , Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Young Adult , Hospitalization , Deafness/rehabilitation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods
19.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 144(1): 44-51, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38400594

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With advances in cochlear implant (CI) technology, prelingual deaf adults may experience improved speech perception and quality of life (QoL). It is still a challenge for Mandarin-speaking CI user with tone recognition due to CI technology focused on intonation language. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term post-CI auditory performance and social-emotional benefits in prelingual deaf Mandarin-speaking adults and the difference between them and post-lingual deaf adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-five adult implanted ears were included (forty-six postlingual deaf group; nine prelingual deaf group). Post-CI long-term outcomes were using vowels, consonants, disyllabic words, Mandarin monosyllable words, categories of audiology performance, speech intelligibility rating, subjective social-emotional questionnaires. RESULTS: Post-CI auditory performance and speech intelligibility of prelingual deafness adults was significantly inferior to that of those with postlingual deafness. However, both groups presented improved social-emotional benefits, with no significant difference between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adult CI recipients who deaf before the age of 4 can experience benefits in social-emotional life functioning, regardless of their limited auditory performance and speech intelligibility. Therefore, prelingual Mandarin-speaking deaf adults, especially those using oral communication, can be considered as relative indications for cochlear implantation. SIGNIFICANCE: To clarify and validate the benefits among Mandarin-speaking prelingual deaf adult recipients.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Speech Perception , Adult , Humans , Quality of Life , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation
20.
Hear Res ; 443: 108953, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277881

ABSTRACT

The present study investigates effects of current focusing and pulse shape on threshold, dynamic range, spread of excitation and channel interaction in the time domain using cochlear implant stimulation. The study was performed on 20 adult guinea pigs using a 6-channel animal cochlear implant, recording was performed in the auditory midbrain using a multielectrode array. After determining the best frequencies for individual recording contacts with acoustic stimulation, the ear was deafened and a cochlear implant was inserted into the cochlea. The position of the implant was controlled by x-ray. Stimulation with biphasic, pseudomonophasic and monophasic stimuli was performed with monopolar, monopolar with common ground, bipolar and tripolar configuration in two sets of experiments, allowing comparison of the effects of the different stimulation strategies on threshold, dynamic range, spread of excitation and channel interaction. Channel interaction was studied in the temporal domain, where two electrodes were activated with pulse trains and phase locking to these pulse trains in the midbrain was quantified. The results documented multifactorial influences on the response properties, with significant interaction between factors. Thresholds increased with increasing current focusing, but decreased with pseudomonophasic and monophasic pulse shapes. The results documented that current focusing, particularly tripolar configuration, effectively reduces channel interaction, but that also pseudomonophasic and monophasic stimulation and phase duration intensity coding reduce channel interactions.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Animals , Guinea Pigs , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Cochlea/physiology , Electric Stimulation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...