Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.783
Filter
1.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 25(3): 171-181, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39159131

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The implantation of biohybrid electrodes was introduced a few years ago in our clinic. These electrodes coated with autologous mononuclear cells releasing anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective factors are thought to reduce insertion trauma and maintain the vitality of surviving spiral ganglion neurons. The clinical feasibility of this approach has already been demonstrated. In the present retrospective study, the four-year results of the two sides (classical electrode and biohybrid electrode) in the bilaterally implanted patients were compared in order to investigate possible adverse long-term effects. METHODS: All patients received a complete audiological diagnosis which also included a speech audiogram and impedance measurement. The measurements were carried out 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 4 years after implantation. The hearing results were assessed by pure tone audiometry. RESULTS: All patients showed satisfactory speech understanding and similar impedances on both sides although they had a long-term deafness before implantation of the side provided with a biohybrid electrode array. The results of speech understanding and impedance measurements were stable for years. Cone beam computed tomography was performed in 4 patients three years after implantation and could rule out cochlear ossification. Other complications were also not registered in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: Due to satisfactory outcomes and lack of complications, the biohybrid electrode is considered to be a safe option in cochlear implantation. The simplicity of application of autologous cells as a source of anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective factors via a biohybrid electrode array is a key step for cell-based, regenerative therapies for deafness.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Speech Perception , Follow-Up Studies , Aged , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Time Factors , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Electrodes, Implanted
2.
J Int Adv Otol ; 20(4): 289-300, 2024 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39159037

ABSTRACT

People with single-sided deafness (SSD) or asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) have particular difficulty understanding speech in noisy listening situations and in sound localization. The objective of this multicenter study is to evaluate the effect of a cochlear implant (CI) in adults with single-sided deafness (SSD) or asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), particularly regarding sound localization and speech intelligibility with additional interest in electric-acoustic pitch matching. A prospective longitudinal study at 7 European tertiary referral centers was conducted including 19 SSD and 16 AHL subjects undergoing cochlear implantation. Sound localization accuracy was investigated in terms of root mean square error and signed bias before and after implantation. Speech recognition in quiet and speech reception thresholds in noise for several spatial configurations were assessed preoperatively and at several post-activation time points. Pitch perception with CI was tracked using pitch matching. Data up to 12 months post activation were collected. In both SSD and AHL subjects, CI significantly improved sound localization for sound sources on the implant side, and thus overall sound localization. Speech recognition in quiet with the implant ear improved significantly. In noise, a significant head shadow effect was found for SSD subjects only. However, the evaluation of AHL subjects was limited by the small sample size. No uniform development of pitch perception with the implant ear was observed. The benefits shown in this study confirm and expand the existing body of evidence for the effectiveness of CI in SSD and AHL. Particularly, improved localization was shown to result from increased localization accuracy on the implant side.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Sound Localization , Speech Perception , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Male , Sound Localization/physiology , Female , Middle Aged , Speech Perception/physiology , Prospective Studies , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Follow-Up Studies , Aged , Adult , Europe , Longitudinal Studies , Treatment Outcome , Speech Intelligibility/physiology , Pitch Perception/physiology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/physiopathology , Noise
3.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 184: 112068, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146843

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implant surgery is a cornerstone in the treatment of severe to profound hearing impairment. Despite comprising a significant proportion of the deaf population, children with additional needs have only been included for cochlear implant candidacy in recent years. This paper aims to evaluate the long-term progress of children with additional needs post-implantation compared to children without additional and assess how this trend changes over time. METHODS: This is a longitudinal cohort study comparing the outcomes between children with no additional needs, children with a single additional need, and children with multiple additional needs. The five outcome measures used assessed both auditory perception and expressive and receptive language. For each outcome measure, subjects were assessed pre implant and one-, three-, and five-years post-implant. RESULTS: The total cohort consisted of 334 subjects: 181 with no additional needs, 116 with a single additional need, and 37 with multiple additional needs. The results showed that children with additional needs performed significantly poorer in all outcome measures compared to those without additional needs, with a greater negative effect associated with multiple additional needs. In auditory perception, both additional needs groups increased in rate of progress over time, in contrast to language capabilities for which the rate plateaued at a significantly lower level than children without additional needs. Once again, both of these effects were greater for the multiple additional needs group. CONCLUSION: It is clear that there is reduced progress in children with additional needs compared to those without, and that the number of additional needs present is an important factor in this. Despite initial delays, it seems as though children with additional needs may catch up over time in auditory perception scores, however for language skills, this cohort may achieve limited scores even as time progresses. It is important to investigate this further to gauge the factors that are causing this discrepancy to see if any can be limited to maximise outcome.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Male , Female , Child , Child, Preschool , Longitudinal Studies , Treatment Outcome , Deafness/surgery , Auditory Perception/physiology , Cohort Studies , Time Factors , Speech Perception/physiology
4.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(8): 840-848, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142304

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Post-meningitis deafness (PMD) is a potentially devastating cause of hearing loss among pediatric and adult patients, for which hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CIs) remains the standard of care. To date, there have been limited systematic studies on the impact of cochlear ossification (CO) and time-to-implantation (TTI) on audiological outcomes. METHODS: An online database search was performed on the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for articles within the past 20 years pertaining to audiological outcomes among pediatric and adult patients with PMD. Information on study characteristics, patient demographics, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications was collected and analyzed. RESULTS: From 8,325 articles generated in the original search, 11 were included in the final analysis, representing 376 patients in total. Of the articles discussing TTI, the majority (3 of 4) found that a shorter TTI of 6 months on average led to improved audiological outcomes compared with control groups with a longer TTI. Of the articles that discussed the impact of preoperative CO, the majority (4 of 6) found that the presence of CO had a detrimental effect on postoperative audiological outcomes after CI. Finally, of the articles that discussed long-term audiological outcomes for PMD compared with the non-PMD control group after CI, the majority (4 of 7) found that PMD patients had inferior long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: CI is a safe and effective treatment modality for PMD, with the majority of literature demonstrating improved long-term outcomes for patients without CO and a reduced TTI.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Deafness , Meningitis , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Deafness/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Meningitis/complications , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications
5.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0307881, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102399

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cochlear Implant (CI) has been shown to improve speech comprehension, sound localization and tinnitus in adults with Single-Sided-Deafness (SSD) compared to standard treatment currently available in the Dutch setting such as a CROS (Contralateral Routing of Signals) hearing device or a BCD (Bone Conduction Device). Also, for the pediatric population with SSD, CI has shown to be clinically meaningful. Because currently no information is available on the health economic effects of CI in adults and children with SSD in the Netherlands, a cost-utility analysis was conducted. METHODS: We developed a Markov cohort model, for both the adult and pediatric SSD population, with three states: implant, no implant, and dead. CI was compared with the Bone Conduction Device (BCD) treatment, requiring surgery and no specific treatment. The time horizon of the model was lifelong, costs were discounted with 3% and effects with 1.5%. A societal perspective was taken, including productivity costs in the analysis, with costing data based on publicly available prices for the Netherlands. Values for clinical outcome parameters, i.e. hearing gain, and event probabilities were based on existing literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses as well as scenario analyses were performed to outline uncertainty of individual and combined parameters. RESULTS: Mean per patient costs for CI in the adult population were €194,051 (95%-CrI €177,274 to €211,108) compared to the total costs of €185,310 (95%-CrI €182,367 to €194,142) for BCD resulting in a cost difference of €8,826 (95%-CrI -€5,020 to €18,252). Compared to no treatment, the cost difference was -€25,089 (95%-CrI -€31,678 to -€6,003). Adults who were treated with CI gained 18.41 (95%-CrI 18.07 to 18.75) quality adjusted life years (QALY) whereas BCD patients gained 15.81 QALYs (95%-CrI 15.53 to 16.10), a difference of 2.60 QALYs (95%-CrI 2.15 to 3.05). The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) for adults with CI was determined to be €3,494/QALY gained. Patient without treatment gained 13.46 QALY (95%-CrI 13.20 to 13.73), a difference of 4.95 (95%-CrI 4.87 to 5.01) resulting in CI dominating no treatment. The ICER remained below the Dutch threshold of €20,000/QALY. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the results. For children, CI dominated when compared to BCD and when compared to no treatment. Compared to BCD, CI led to a cost saving of €29,611 (95%-CrI -€126,800 to €54,375) and compared to no treatment, CI resulted in a cost saving of €57,658 (95%-CrI -€146,687 to €5,919). The incremental QALY gain compared to BCD was 7.22 (95%-CrI 4.19 to 8.55) and 26.03 (95%-CrI 20.82 to 31.06) compared to no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this health economic evaluation with a Markov cohort model, it is very likely that CI is cost-effective compared to BCD and to no treatment in the Dutch adult and pediatric population with SSD. In both populations the ICER was below the Dutch cost-effectiveness threshold of €20,000/QALY.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Netherlands , Cochlear Implants/economics , Adult , Child , Markov Chains , Female , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Male , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Deafness/economics , Deafness/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/economics , Aged
6.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 25(3): 197-204, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39031768

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Decision regret post-surgery has has been linked to health outcomes for a number of elective procedures but is understudied in cochlear implantation satisfaction. Theunpredictability in outcomes may lead to unmet expectations by the recipient. This study is the first study to investigate the decision regret concept in cochlear implant recipients. OBJECTIVE: Tto investigate post-operative decision regret in (CI) recipients. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study using the validated Ottawa Decision Regret Scale, and whether the CI met the patient's expectations. Variables potentially associated with decision regret including patient demographics, post-operative speech perception scores, duration of deafness, duration of CI use and age were analyzed using the logistic regression model. SETTING: This was a multi-center study. Participants were recruited and enrolled from the University of Miami and the University of Kansas in an outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: Adult, English-speaking CI recipients with at least 6 months of listening experience with their implant. RESULTS: Out of 173 58% reported no regret, 27% reported mild, and 15% reported moderate-to-strong regret. Expectations were met in 77% while not meeting expectations in 14%. The remaining 8% were neutral. Decisional regret was significantly associated (p = 0.02) with poor post-operative speech perception. No other variables were associated with regret. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative decision regret was reported by 42% of CI recipients. Poor speech perception abilities were associated with increased risk of regret. Further research is required to identify regret risks and provide resources to mitigate regret in CI recipients.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Decision Making , Emotions , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Aged , Adult , Postoperative Period , Patient Satisfaction , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/surgery , Young Adult
7.
Hear Res ; 451: 109079, 2024 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053297

ABSTRACT

Brain plasticity refers to the brain's ability to reorganize its structure or function in response to experiences, learning, and environmental influences. This phenomenon is particularly significant in individuals with deafness, as the brain adapts to compensate for the lack of auditory stimulation. The aim of this study is to investigate whether cochlear implantation can restore a normal pattern of brain activation following auditory stimulation in cases of asymmetric hearing loss. We used a PET-scan technique to assess brain activity after cochlear implantation, specifically during an auditory voice/non-voice discrimination task. The results indicated a nearly normal pattern of brain activity during the auditory discrimination task, except for increased activation in areas related to attentional processes compared to controls. Additionally, brain activity at rest showed significant changes in implanted participants, including cross modal visuo-auditory processing. Therefore, cochlear implants can restore the brain's activation pattern through long-term adaptive adjustments in intrinsic brain activity.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Adaptation, Physiological , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Neuronal Plasticity , Positron-Emission Tomography , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Brain Mapping/methods , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/physiopathology , Hearing , Case-Control Studies , Auditory Perception , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/diagnostic imaging , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/psychology , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/diagnostic imaging , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/surgery , Aged , Correction of Hearing Impairment , Discrimination, Psychological
8.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(10): 5243-5254, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38977469

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Clinical registries have great potential for quality control of medical procedures regarding the indications, therapeutic processes and results, including their possible complications. This is particularly true when providing patients with severe hearing loss or deafness with a cochlear implant (CI). This treatment represents a lifelong care process that requires continuous quality control over time. On the initiative of the Executive Committee of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e.V., DGHNO-KHC), a national German CI registry (Deutsches Cochlear Implant Register, DCIR) was established in January 2022. This article focuses on the first demographic and baseline data of the DCIR. METHODS: The DCIR covers the complete therapeutic process from indication, surgery, fitting and lifelong aftercare in CI therapy. By the end of 2022, 75 hospitals in Germany had agreed to contribute to the DCIR. RESULTS: During the year 2022, 63 hospitals actively contributed data to the DCIR. Pseudonymized data from 2,292 CI implantations (2,176 primary implantations, 99 explantations with immediate re-implantations and 17 re-implantations following an earlier explantation) in 2,108 patients were documented. Cochlear implantation was accomplished in 1,807 adults (≥ 18 years) and 301 children (< 18 years). Fourty patients (1,9%) were children < 1 year of age and 55 (2,6%) were patients > 85 years. From the total of 2,292 implantations, 226 (9.9%) were performed as simultaneous bilateral implantations (CI implantation in both ears of 113 patients on the same day of surgery) and 412 implantations (19.1% of 2,162 implantations with data provided on the contralateral ear's hearing status) were in patients with single sided deafness (normal hearing in the contralateral ear). In addition, the reported complications in 2022 were also evaluated. Seven reports (0.4%) of mild to moderate severe facial nerve dysfunctions were documented. No reports of severe or total facial nerve dysfunction (House-Brackmann grade V/VI), meningitis or death related to CI therapy were documented. CONCLUSION: Although still in the start-up phase, these initial DCIR data already provide an interesting first insight into the demographic structure and baseline data of CI therapy in Germany. The successful implementation of the DCIR represents an important step towards continuous quality control of CI care.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Registries , Humans , Germany/epidemiology , Child , Adolescent , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Adult , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Aged , Infant , Young Adult , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over
9.
Hear Res ; 450: 109076, 2024 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991628

ABSTRACT

As part of a longitudinal study regarding the benefit of early cochlear implantation for children with single-sided deafness, the current work explored the children's daily device use, potential barriers to full-time device use, and the children's ability to understand speech with the cochlear implant (CI). Data were collected from 20 children with prelingual SSD who received a CI before the age of 2.5 years, from the initial activation of the sound processor until the children were 4.8 to 11.0 years old. Daily device use was extracted from the CI's data logging, while word perception in quiet was assessed using direct audio input to the children's sound processor. The children's caregivers completed a questionnaire about habits, motivations, and barriers to device use. The children with SSD and a CI used their device on average 8.3 h per day, corresponding to 63 % of their time spent awake. All children except one could understand speech through the CI, with an average score of 59 % on a closed-set test and 73 % on an open-set test. More device use was associated with higher speech perception scores. Parents were happy with their decision to pursue a CI for their child. Certain habits, like taking off the sound processor during illness, were associated with lower device use. Providing timely counselling to the children's parents, focused on SSD-specific challenges, may be helpful to improve daily device use in these children.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Female , Male , Child , Child, Preschool , Time Factors , Longitudinal Studies , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Speech Intelligibility , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/psychology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Comprehension , Treatment Outcome , Child Language , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/diagnosis , Deafness/surgery , Age Factors , Child Behavior , Motivation , Infant
10.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ; 90(5): 101458, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39032465

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of loss to follow-up in a cochlear implant program from the public health system in Southern Brazil as well as the characteristics of hearing loss, sociodemographic, sociocultural and the development of oral language in children with prelingual deafness. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with children who underwent CI surgery between 2010 and 2020. Data was collected through of interviews and review of medical records. The language development assessment was performed using the MUSS, MAIS and IT-MAIS scales. For the classification of language development, we used as parameters the values (mean ±â€¯SD) found in a previous national study. From those values, the Z-score for each patient at each hearing age (time of experience with the cochlear implant) was calculated. RESULTS: Of the 225 children implanted between 2010-2020, 129 were included in this study. The rate of loss to follow-up in the program was 42.6%. The mean age at first surgery was 40.5 (±16.9) months, with 77.5% of patients having received a unilateral implant. Language results below the expected for hearing age (

Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Language Development , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Child, Preschool , Male , Female , Brazil , Infant , Deafness/surgery , Child , Socioeconomic Factors
11.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965850

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant (CI) users with single-sided deafness (SSD). Methods: This study was a single-center prospective cohort study. Eleven Mandarin-speaking adult SSD patients who underwent CI implantation at Capital Medical University Beijing Tongren Hospital from August 2020 to October 2021 were recruited, including 6 males and 5 females, with the age ranging from 24 to 50 years old. In a sound field with 7 loudspeakers distributed at 180°, we measured root-mean-square error(RMSE)in SSD patients at the preoperative, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month after switch-on to assess the improvement of sound source localization. The Mandarin Speech Perception (MSP) was used in the sound field to test the speech reception threshold (SRT) of SSD patients under different signal-to-noise locations in a steady-state noise under conditions of CI off and CI on, to reflect the head shadow effect(SSSDNNH), binaural summation effect(S0N0) and squelch effect(S0NSSD). The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess changes in tinnitus severity and tinnitus loudness in SSD patients at each time point. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale(SSQ) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Scale (NCIQ) were used to assess the subjective benefits of spatial speech perception and quality of life in SSD patients after cochlear implantation. SPSS 19.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: SSD patients showed a significant improvement in the poorer ear in hearing thresholds with CI-on compared with CI-off; The ability to localize the sound source was significantly improved, with statistically significant differences in RMSE at each follow-up time compared with the preoperative period (P<0.05). In the SSSDNNH condition, which reflects the head shadow effect, the SRT in binaural hearing was significantly improved by 6.5 dB compared with unaided condition, and the difference was statistically significant (t=6.25, P=0.001). However, there was no significant improvement in SRT between the binaural hearing condition and unaided conditions in the S0N0 and S0NSSD conditions (P>0.05). The total score of THI and three dimensions were significant decreased (P<0.05). Tinnitus VAS scores were significantly lower in binaural hearing compared to the unaided condition (P<0.001). The total score of SSQ, and the scores of speech and spatial dimensions were significant improved in binaural hearing compared to the unaided condition (P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in NCIQ questionnaire scores between preoperative and postoperative (P>0.05), and only the self-efficacy subscore showed a significant increase(Z=-2.497,P=0.013). Conclusion: CI could help Mandarin-speaking SSD patients restore binaural hearing to some extent, improve sound localization and speech recognition in noise. In addition, CI in SSD patients could suppress tinnitus, reduce the loudness of tinnitus, and improve subjective perceptions of spatial hearing and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Humans , Male , Female , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Young Adult , Sound Localization , Tinnitus/surgery , Deafness/surgery , Hearing Aids
12.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 182: 112020, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38964177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lexical tone presents challenges to cochlear implant (CI) users especially in noise conditions. Bimodal hearing utilizes residual acoustic hearing in the contralateral side and may offer benefits for tone recognition in noise. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate tone recognition in both steady-state noise and multi-talker babbles by the prelingually-deafened, Mandarin-speaking children with unilateral CIs or bimodal hearing. METHODS: Fifty-three prelingually-deafened, Mandarin-speaking children who received CIs participated in this study. Twenty-two of them were unilateral CI users and 31 wore a hearing aid (HA) in the contralateral ear (i.e., bimodal hearing). All subjects were tested for Mandarin tone recognition in quiet and in two types of maskers: speech-spectrum-shaped noise (SSN) and two-talker babbles (TTB) at four signal-to-noise ratios (-6, 0, +6, and +12 dB). RESULTS: While no differences existed in tone recognition in quiet between the two groups, the Bimodal group outperformed the Unilateral CI group under noise conditions. The differences between the two groups were significant at SNRs of 0, +6, and +12 dB in the SSN conditions (all p < 0.05), and at SNRs of +6 and +12 dB of TTB conditions (both p < 0.01), but not significant at other conditions (p > 0.05). The TTB exerted a greater masking effect than the SSN for tone recognition in the Unilateral CI group as well as in the Bimodal group at all SNRs tested (all p < 0.05). Among demographic or audiometric variables, only age at implantation showed a weak but significant correlation with the mean tone recognition performance under the SSN conditions (r = -0.276, p = 0.045). However, when Bonferroni correction was applied to the correlation analysis results, the weak correlation became not significant. CONCLUSION: Prelingually-deafened children with CIs face challenges in tone perception in noisy environments, especially when the noise is fluctuating in amplitude such as the multi-talker babbles. Wearing a HA on the contralateral side when residual hearing permits is beneficial for tone recognition in noise.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Noise , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Speech Perception/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Deafness/surgery , Hearing Aids , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Language
13.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 183: 112048, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39068706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Children with cochlear implants (CIs) often lag behind children with normal hearing (NH) in early literacy skills. Furthermore, the development of language skills associated with their emergent literacy skills seems to depend on good auditory access. Supporting language acquisition and early literacy in children with CIs may prevent difficulties in primary school. The use of technology may facilitate auditory and speech recovery in children with CIs, but evidence on computer-based early literacy programs is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates (a) the effects of a computer-based program focusing on the syllabic method on the literacy skills of children with CIs (CIs group), comparing them with the literacy skills of a group of age-matched NH (normal hearing) peers (NHs group); (b) the associations between language and early literacy skills in the NHs group and between language, auditory and early literacy skills in the CIs group. METHOD: Nine prelingually deaf children with CIs (M = 61.11, SD = 6.90) with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss and nine age-matched NH children participated in the program. Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) as measures of children's auditory skills were collected. All participants were tested on phonological, morphosyntax (grammatical comprehension and repetition), and early literacy skills (syllable blending and segmentation, syllable and word reading) (T1). Next, all children participated in the computer-based program for 12 weeks. After the program was completed (T2), only early literacy tests were administered to the children. RESULTS: Although, on average, both groups obtained higher scores in all literacy tasks at T2, the CIs group scored lower than the NHs group. In the CIs group, at T2 we found significant improvements in syllable segmentation (p = 0.042) and word reading (p = 0.035). In the NHs group, at T2 we found significant improvements in syllable segmentation (p = 0.034), syllable blending (p = 0.022), syllable reading (p = 0.008), and word reading (p = 0.009). We also found significant associations in both groups between measures of morphosyntax at T1 and measures of early literacy at T2. In addition, for the CIs group, we found significant associations between children's auditory performance at T1 and measures of morphosyntax at T1 and early literacy at T2. CONCLUSION: a computer-based program focused on the syllabic method could support children with CIs in acquiring emergent literacy abilities. The auditory performance of children with CIs seems to influence their morphosyntax and later early literacy skills.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Literacy , Humans , Male , Female , Child , Deafness/surgery , Child, Preschool , Case-Control Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Language Development , Cochlear Implantation , Reading , Software
14.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 17524, 2024 07 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080361

ABSTRACT

This study aims to analyse the volumetric changes in brain MRI after cochlear implantation (CI), focusing on the speech perception in postlingually deaf adults. We conducted a prospective cohort study with 16 patients who had bilateral hearing loss and received unilateral CI. Based on the surgical side, patients were categorized into left and right CI groups. Volumetric T1-weighted brain MRI were obtained before and one year after the surgery. To overcome the artifact caused by the internal device in post-CI scan, image reconstruction method was newly devised and applied using the contralateral hemisphere of the pre-CI MRI data, to run FreeSurfer. We conducted within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis, based on the linear mixed effect models. When analyzing the contralateral cerebral hemisphere before and after CI, a substantial increase in superior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus (STG) volumes was observed in the left CI group. A positive correlation was observed in the STG and post-CI word recognition score in both groups. As far as we know, this is the first study attempting longitudinal brain volumetry based on post-CI MRI scans. We demonstrate that better auditory performance after CI is associated with structural restoration in central auditory structures.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Deafness , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Speech Perception/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Aged , Cochlear Implants
15.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 51(5): 846-852, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39084004

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the long-term impact of prelingual deafness and elderly age at cochlear implantation on cochlear implant (CI) programming parameters and CI thresholds METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent cochlear implantation less than 5 years (Prelingual group) and equal and more than 18 years in our institute. The latter group was further divided into Adult and Elderly groups according to whether the patient was younger or older than 65 at implantation. From 152, 69, and 55 patients in the Prelingual, Adult, and Elderly groups, 242, 92, and 58 ears were included. We compared CI thresholds and CI programming parameters, including impedances, T/C levels, and dynamic ranges for 8 years after implantation between the Prelingual, Adult, and Elderly groups. RESULTS: The Prelingual group showed consistently lower CI thresholds than the Adult and Elderly groups during the postoperative 2-8 years, but no difference was detected between the Elderly and Adult groups, except at the postoperative 4 years. The elderly group's CI thresholds did not deteriorate until postoperative 8 years. The Prelingual group showed consistently larger T/C levels (minimum/maximum current strength from CI), especially C levels, than the other two groups. At the same time, there was no significant difference between the Elderly and Adult groups except for smaller dynamic ranges in the Elderly group until postoperative 2 years. These results in the CI programming parameters might explain the lower CI thresholds in the Prelingual group than in the other groups. Focusing on CI maps 1 and 3 years after implantation, the strength of the T/C levels was similar for all channels in the Prelingual group, but the Adult and Elderly groups showed larger electrical stimuli in channels responsible for the middle frequencies than those for the lower or higher frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a significant influence of prelingual deafness but less impact of elderly age at implantation on long-term CI programming parameters and CI thresholds. The larger C levels and lower CI thresholds in the Prelingual group than in the Adult and Elderly groups implied that CI children with prelingual deafness tolerate and prefer larger CI stimuli, which may reflect the CI-dependent development of their auditory system before the critical period. No age-related reduction in hearing thresholds was observed in the Elderly group, probably because the CI compensates for age-related dysfunction of the peripheral auditory system.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Humans , Aged , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Age Factors , Adult , Middle Aged , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult , Psychoacoustics , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Infant , Electric Impedance
16.
Hear Res ; 450: 109069, 2024 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889562

ABSTRACT

Spoken language development after pediatric cochlear implantation requires rapid and efficient processing of novel, degraded auditory signals and linguistic information. These demands for rapid adaptation tax the information processing speed ability of children who receive cochlear implants. This study investigated the association of speed of information processing ability with spoken language outcomes after cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children aged 4-6 years. Two domain-general (visual, non-linguistic) speed of information processing measures were administered to 21 preschool-aged children with cochlear implants and 23 normal-hearing peers. Measures of speech recognition, language (vocabulary and comprehension), nonverbal intelligence, and executive functioning skills were also obtained from each participant. Speed of information processing was positively associated with speech recognition and language skills in preschool-aged children with cochlear implants but not in normal-hearing peers. This association remained significant after controlling for hearing group, age, nonverbal intelligence, and executive functioning skills. These findings are consistent with models suggesting that domain-general, fast-efficient information processing speed underlies adaptation to speech perception and language learning following implantation. Assessment and intervention strategies targeting speed of information processing may provide better understanding and development of speech-language skills after cochlear implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Executive Function , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Child , Female , Child, Preschool , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Case-Control Studies , Child Language , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Comprehension , Language Development , Vocabulary , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Intelligence , Age Factors , Language Tests
17.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(6): e483-e489, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865725

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of related factors on long-term speech perception and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes in postlingual deaf Mandarin-speaking adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients and to assess any differences between tone language and other intonation language CI adult users. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cases review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Forty-five adult CI recipients (48 implanted ears). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-CI outcomes were evaluated after follow-ups of more than 24 months using speech perception tests and QoL questionnaires. We analyzed the related factors affecting CI outcomes. RESULTS: A shorter duration of profound deafness was predictive factors for better post-CI speech perception. Earlier implantation and better performance of vowel scores were predictive of better subjective improvements in social and emotional life. Post-CI vowel scores of over 56% indicated promising improvements in QoL. CONCLUSION: Shorter duration of deafness could have better post-CI speech perception. Post-CI vowel scores instead of monosyllable words have the more potential to predict the QoL in Mandarin-speaking adult CI recipients.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Language , Quality of Life , Speech Perception , Humans , Speech Perception/physiology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(6): e472-e477, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865724

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the quality of life (QOL) of adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans after cochlear implantation (CI) using the cross-culturally adapted Chinese Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Tertiary care neurotology practice in New York City. PATIENTS: Thirty adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans (22.8-89.4 yr, mean 48.9 yr) with prelingual (12) or postlingual (18) deafness who underwent CI between 1995 and 2020. All patients were at least 1 year from CI activation. INTERVENTION: CI. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Chinese CIQOL-10 Global score. RESULTS: There were no detectable differences in mean Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores between the prelingual (mean 51.9, SD 11.0) and postlingual (mean 44.0, SD 16.4) cohorts (p = 0.1; 95% CI, -2.3 to 18.1; Hedges' g = 0.5). Comparison of the overall cohort (mean 47.1, SD 14.8) with previously published CIQOL-10 Global scores of English-speaking American CI users (mean 51.5, SD 10.4) demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.4-8.4; Hedges' g = 0.4). For the overall cohort, multivariable analysis demonstrated that combined household income (p = 0.007, ß = 7.4; 95% CI, 0.7-14.0) was positively associated with Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to evaluate QOL after CI in Mandarin-speaking Chinese American adults. The CIQOL-10 Global scores of Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans CI users are significantly worse than those of English-speaking American CI users. Combined household income may be positively associated with QOL in the Mandarin-speaking Chinese American CI population. More resources are needed to assess outcomes and support rehabilitation in this population.


Subject(s)
Asian , Cochlear Implantation , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Asian/psychology , Cochlear Implants , Cross-Sectional Studies , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/psychology
19.
J Neurosci ; 44(28)2024 Jul 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830759

ABSTRACT

Congenital single-sided deafness (SSD) leads to an aural preference syndrome that is characterized by overrepresentation of the hearing ear in the auditory system. Cochlear implantation (CI) of the deaf ear is an effective treatment for SSD. However, the newly introduced auditory input in congenital SSD often does not reach expectations in late-implanted CI recipients with respect to binaural hearing and speech perception. In a previous study, a reduction of the interaural time difference (ITD) sensitivity has been shown in unilaterally congenitally deaf cats (uCDCs). In the present study, we focused on the interaural level difference (ILD) processing in the primary auditory cortex. The uCDC group was compared with hearing cats (HCs) and bilaterally congenitally deaf cats (CDCs). The ILD representation was reorganized, replacing the preference for the contralateral ear with a preference for the hearing ear, regardless of the cortical hemisphere. In accordance with the previous study, uCDCs were less sensitive to interaural time differences than HCs, resulting in unmodulated ITD responses, thus lacking directional information. Such incongruent ITDs and ILDs cannot be integrated for binaural sound source localization. In normal hearing, the predominant effect of each ear is excitation of the auditory cortex in the contralateral cortical hemisphere and inhibition in the ipsilateral hemisphere. In SSD, however, auditory pathways reorganized such that the hearing ear produced greater excitation in both cortical hemispheres and the deaf ear produced weaker excitation and preserved inhibition in both cortical hemispheres.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex , Cochlear Implantation , Cues , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Sound Localization , Cats , Animals , Sound Localization/physiology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Female , Male , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Functional Laterality/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/congenital , Deafness/surgery
20.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(9): 4757-4762, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703197

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Perceived social support has been shown to positively correlate with health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in a variety of conditions. This study investigated whether perceived social support is affecting HR-QoL of patients who receive a cochlear implant (CI) for deafness. METHODS: Eighty eight adults (56 males, 32 females; mean age: 60 years) with a uni- or bilateral CI for bilateral high-grade hearing loss were administered two questionnaires: a questionnaire for perceived social support (FSU-14) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) for hearing-specific HR-QoL. Administration of the questionnaires occurred at four points in time: before implantation and three, 12 and 24 months after implant activation. RESULTS: The CI patients had quite high levels of perceived social support (mean percentile rank: 71), which remained stable at all four measurement points. Multivariate Analysis showed a significant interaction between perceived social support and HR-QoL indicating that higher perceived social support lead to higher improvement of HR-QoL after cochlear implantation. CONCLUSION: The CI patients in this study had higher than average levels of perceived social support, which did not change before and after cochlear implantation. Perceived social support and HR-QoL were related such that patients with high levels of perceived social support experienced greater improvement of their HR-QoL after cochlear implantation than patients with low levels of perceived social support. Based on this finding, perceived social support must be considered as an important factor for HR-QoL after cochlear implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Quality of Life , Social Support , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Adult , Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Aged, 80 and over , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/surgery , Deafness/rehabilitation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL