Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rehabilitation Interventions for Teeth With Extensive Coronary Destruction.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of rehabilitation interventions for management of posterior teeth (molar) with extensive coronary destruction. METHODOLOGY: An economic model by Markov simulated a hypothetical 10-year cohort with 1,000 patients requiring treatment for a molar tooth with pulp necrosis and extensive coronary destruction. This study adopted the perspective of a local manager from Specialized Center in Dentistry, based on the transfer from the Ministry of Health. Treatments were proposed: Tooth Extraction + Removable Partial Denture (TE+RPD); Root Canal Treatment + Intra-Radicular Restoration + Single Crown (RCT+RIR+SC); and Tooth Extraction + Dental Implant + Single Crown (TE+DI+SC). The costs were obtained from the SUS Integrated System of Procedures, Medicines and orthoses; prostheses and special materials table management (SIGTAP). Failure and survival rates were obtained from systematic reviews. The variable "years of survival" was an outcome of effectiveness. The probabilistic simulation considered the confidence interval of 95%, variation of parameters by 5% and annual discount rate of 5%. RESULTS: TE+RPD intervention presented lower cost and effectiveness. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of RCT+IRR+SC and TE+DI+SC interventions compared to TE+RPD were $13.06 and $9.92 per year of survival. Compared to RCT+IRR+SC, the TE+DI+SC intervention had an ICER=$26.90 per year of survival. The acceptability curve indicates that the choice of intervention depends on the willingness to pay. CONCLUSION: The RCT+IRR+SC intervention presented a balance of cost-effectiveness. Rehabilitation with implants can be considered in view of the higher expectation of longevity and, especially, greater willingness to pay.

Crise econômica, austeridade e seus efeitos sobre o financiamento e acesso a serviços públicos e privados de saúde bucal / Economic crisis, austerity and its effects on the financing of oral health and access to public and private services

Resumo O presente estudo analisou os efeitos da austeridade e crise econômica sobre o financiamento da saúde bucal, oferta e utilização de serviços públicos e acesso a planos exclusivamente odontológicos no Brasil, no período de 2003 a 2018. Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo, descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa. Foram coletados dados da base do Fundo Nacional de Saúde, da Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar, da Sala de Apoio à Gestão Estratégica, do Sistema e-gestor. Observou-se que o repasse federal fundo a fundo apresentou tendência crescente de 2003 a 2010 e estável de 2011 a 2018. A oferta decresceu ao final do período com redução da cobertura da primeira consulta odontológica programática, média da escovação dental supervisionada e número de tratamentos endodônticos. Na contramão da crise financeira pública, as empresas de planos exclusivamente odontológicos expandiram o mercado de 2,6 milhões de usuários em 2000 para 24,3 milhões em 2018, com lucro de mais de R$240 milhões. A austeridade fiscal tem forte influência sobre a utilização de serviços públicos odontológicos no Brasil, que pode beneficiar o mercado privado e ampliar as desigualdades.

Abstract The present study analyzed the effects of austerity and economic crisis on the financing of oral health, provision and use of public services and access to exclusively dental plans in Brazil, from 2003 to 2018. A retrospective, descriptive study was carried out, with a quantitative approach. Data were collected from the National Health Funding database, the National Supplementary Health Agency, the Strategic Management Support Room, and from the e-manager system. The federal fund-to-fund transfer was increasing from 2003 to 2010 and remained stable from 2011 to 2018. The supply decreased at the end of the period, with reduced coverage of the first programmatic dental appointment, average supervised tooth brushing and number of endodontic treatments. Against the background of the public financial crisis, exclusively dental plan companies expanded the market from 2.6 million users in 2000 to 24.3 million in 2018, with a profit of more than R$ 240 million. Fiscal austerity has a strong influence on the use of public dental services in Brazil, which can benefit the private market and widen inequalities.

Economic crisis, austerity and its effects on the financing of oral health and access to public and private services. / Crise econômica, austeridade e seus efeitos sobre o financiamento e acesso a serviços públicos e privados de saúde bucal.

The present study analyzed the effects of austerity and economic crisis on the financing of oral health, provision and use of public services and access to exclusively dental plans in Brazil, from 2003 to 2018. A retrospective, descriptive study was carried out, with a quantitative approach. Data were collected from the National Health Funding database, the National Supplementary Health Agency, the Strategic Management Support Room, and from the e-manager system. The federal fund-to-fund transfer was increasing from 2003 to 2010 and remained stable from 2011 to 2018. The supply decreased at the end of the period, with reduced coverage of the first programmatic dental appointment, average supervised tooth brushing and number of endodontic treatments. Against the background of the public financial crisis, exclusively dental plan companies expanded the market from 2.6 million users in 2000 to 24.3 million in 2018, with a profit of more than R$ 240 million. Fiscal austerity has a strong influence on the use of public dental services in Brazil, which can benefit the private market and widen inequalities.

O presente estudo analisou os efeitos da austeridade e crise econômica sobre o financiamento da saúde bucal, oferta e utilização de serviços públicos e acesso a planos exclusivamente odontológicos no Brasil, no período de 2003 a 2018. Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo, descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa. Foram coletados dados da base do Fundo Nacional de Saúde, da Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar, da Sala de Apoio à Gestão Estratégica, do Sistema e-gestor. Observou-se que o repasse federal fundo a fundo apresentou tendência crescente de 2003 a 2010 e estável de 2011 a 2018. A oferta decresceu ao final do período com redução da cobertura da primeira consulta odontológica programática, média da escovação dental supervisionada e número de tratamentos endodônticos. Na contramão da crise financeira pública, as empresas de planos exclusivamente odontológicos expandiram o mercado de 2,6 milhões de usuários em 2000 para 24,3 milhões em 2018, com lucro de mais de R$240 milhões. A austeridade fiscal tem forte influência sobre a utilização de serviços públicos odontológicos no Brasil, que pode beneficiar o mercado privado e ampliar as desigualdades.

Out-Of-Pocket Expenditures on Dental Care for Schoolchildren Aged 6 to 12 Years: A Cross-Sectional Estimate in a Less-Developed Country Setting.

Aim: The objective of this study was to estimate the Out-Of-Pocket Expenditures (OOPEs) incurred by households on dental care, as well as to analyze the sociodemographic, economic, and oral health factors associated with such expenditures. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 763 schoolchildren in Mexico. A questionnaire was distributed to parents to determine the variables related to OOPEs on dental care. The amounts were updated in 2017 in Mexican pesos and later converted to 2017 international dollars (purchasing power parities-PPP US $). Multivariate models were created: a linear regression model (which modeled the amount of OOPEs), and a logistic regression model (which modeled the likelihood of incurring OOPEs). Results: The OOPEs on dental care for the 763 schoolchildren were PPP US $53,578, averaging a PPP of US $70.2 ± 123.7 per child. Disbursements for treatment were the principal item within the OOPEs. The factors associated with OOPEs were the child's age, number of dental visits, previous dental pain, main reason for dental visit, educational level of mother, type of health insurance, household car ownership, and socioeconomic position. Conclusions: The average cost of dental care was PPP US $70.2 ± 123.7. Our study shows that households with higher school-aged children exhibiting the highest report of dental morbidity-as well as those without insurance-face the highest OOPEs. An array of variables were associated with higher expenditures. In general, higher-income households spent more on dental care. However, the present study did not estimate unmet needs across the socioeconomic gradient, and thus, future research is needed to fully ascertain disease burden.

[Access to dental services and related factors: a home-based population study]. / Acesso aos serviços odontológicos e fatores associados: estudo populacional domiciliar.

The scope of this study was to identify factors associated with lack of access to dental services. It involved a cross-sectional study and a probabilistic complex sample by conglomerates in two stages with 857 participants over 18 years of age in a large city. Multiple analyses by means of logistic and multivariate regression in decision trees were made. The lack of access to dental services was considered a dependent variable. It was identified that 10.3% did not have access. In the multiple and multivariate analyses an association with age was verified and in the logistic regression a greater possibility of lack of access was found for each year of increased age, among those with the lowest per capita income and those who ranked appearance of teeth and gums as "fair/poor/very poor." The lack of access to dental services was greater among the most socially vulnerable. There is a pressing need to increase the allocation of public resources to promote health education and provide knowledge about how to access services when they are needed, focusing on dental care as a human right and ensuring that lack of access does not occur as users get older or among those with low income and also those dissatisfied with their oral appearance.

Objetivou-se identificar fatores associados à falta de acesso aos serviços odontológicos. Estudo transversal, amostra complexa probabilística por conglomerados em dois estágios de 857 participantes, com mais de 18 anos em um município de grande porte populacional. Foram feitas análises múltiplas através da regressão logística e multivariada em árvores de decisão. Considerou-se como variável dependente o acesso aos serviços odontológicos. Identificou-se que 10,3% não obtiveram acesso. Nas análises múltipla e multivariada constataram-se associação com a idade, na regressão logística constatou-se maior chance de falta de acesso a cada ano de idade incrementado, entre aqueles com menor renda per capita e entre os que classificaram a aparência dos dentes e gengivas como "regular/ruim/péssima". A falta de acesso aos serviços odontológicos é maior entre os mais vulneráveis socialmente. Há necessidade de incremento na alocação de recursos públicos que promovam educação em saúde e gere conhecimento sobre como acessar os serviços quando necessitar, tendo em foco os cuidados odontológicos como um direito humano e que possibilitem que não ocorra a falta de acesso à medida que os usuários envelhecem ou entre os com baixa renda e também os insatisfeitos com a aparência bucal.

Acesso aos serviços odontológicos e fatores associados: estudo populacional domiciliar / Access to dental services and related factors: a home-based population study

Resumo Objetivou-se identificar fatores associados à falta de acesso aos serviços odontológicos. Estudo transversal, amostra complexa probabilística por conglomerados em dois estágios de 857 participantes, com mais de 18 anos em um município de grande porte populacional. Foram feitas análises múltiplas através da regressão logística e multivariada em árvores de decisão. Considerou-se como variável dependente o acesso aos serviços odontológicos. Identificou-se que 10,3% não obtiveram acesso. Nas análises múltipla e multivariada constataram-se associação com a idade, na regressão logística constatou-se maior chance de falta de acesso a cada ano de idade incrementado, entre aqueles com menor renda per capita e entre os que classificaram a aparência dos dentes e gengivas como "regular/ruim/péssima". A falta de acesso aos serviços odontológicos é maior entre os mais vulneráveis socialmente. Há necessidade de incremento na alocação de recursos públicos que promovam educação em saúde e gere conhecimento sobre como acessar os serviços quando necessitar, tendo em foco os cuidados odontológicos como um direito humano e que possibilitem que não ocorra a falta de acesso à medida que os usuários envelhecem ou entre os com baixa renda e também os insatisfeitos com a aparência bucal.

Abstract The scope of this study was to identify factors associated with lack of access to dental services. It involved a cross-sectional study and a probabilistic complex sample by conglomerates in two stages with 857 participants over 18 years of age in a large city. Multiple analyses by means of logistic and multivariate regression in decision trees were made. The lack of access to dental services was considered a dependent variable. It was identified that 10.3% did not have access. In the multiple and multivariate analyses an association with age was verified and in the logistic regression a greater possibility of lack of access was found for each year of increased age, among those with the lowest per capita income and those who ranked appearance of teeth and gums as "fair/poor/very poor." The lack of access to dental services was greater among the most socially vulnerable. There is a pressing need to increase the allocation of public resources to promote health education and provide knowledge about how to access services when they are needed, focusing on dental care as a human right and ensuring that lack of access does not occur as users get older or among those with low income and also those dissatisfied with their oral appearance.

Can Biological Markers Partially Explain the Link Between the Social Environment and Oral Health? / ¿Pueden los marcadores biológicos explicar parcialmente la relación entre el entorno social y la salud oral?

Abstract Understanding how the social world affects humans´ health by "getting under the skin" and penetrating the cells, organs and physiological systems of the body is a key tenet in public health research. Here, we propose the idea that socioeconomic position (SEP) can be biologically embodied, potentially leading to the production of health inequalities in oral health across population groups. Recent studies show that being exposed to chronic stress across the life course could impact our health. Allostatic load (AL) is a composite biological measure of overall physiological wear-and-tear that could allow a better understanding of the potential biological pathways playing a role in the construction of the social gradient in adult health. However, to use biological measures to better understand the mechanisms that construct health inequalities in oral health has not been tested systematically. The purposes of this New Perspective is to discuss the value of using composite biological markers, such as AL, to analyze oral health. This can allow a better understanding of the mechanisms leading to health inequalities in oral health, and add some valuable information for implementing health interventions.

Resumen Comprender cómo el mundo social afecta la salud de los seres humanos "penetrando bajo la piel" e introduciéndose dentro de las células, los órganos y los sistemas fisiológicos del cuerpo, es un principio clave en la investigación en salud pública. Aquí, proponemos la idea que la posición socioeconómica puede incorporarse biológicamente, lo que puede conducir a la producción de inequidades sociales en salud entre diferentes grupos de población. Estudios recientes muestran que estar expuesto al estrés crónico a lo largo de la vida podría afectar nuestra salud. La carga alostática es una medida biológica compuesta del desgaste fisiológico global del cuerpo que podría permitir una mejor comprensión de las posibles vías biológicas que desempeñan un papel en la construcción del gradiente social en la salud del adulto. Sin embargo, el uso de medidas biológicas para comprender mejor los mecanismos que construyen las inequidades sociales en salud oral, no se ha probado sistemáticamente. El propósito de este boletín de New Perspective es analizar el valor del uso de marcadores biológicos compuestos, como la carga alostática, para analizar la salud oral. Esto puede permitir una mejor comprensión de los mecanismos que conducen a las inequidades sociales en salud oral, y así agregar información valiosa para implementar de manera más adecuada las intervenciones en salud.

[Inequalities in Brazilian families' income commitment to out-of-pocket spending on dental care]. / Desigualdades no comprometimento da renda domiciliar dos brasileiros com gastos privados em assistência odontológica.

The study aimed to investigate inequalities in the commitment of family income to private expenditures on dental care in Brazil. Data were analyzed from 55,970 Brazilian households that participated in the nationwide Family Budgets Survey in 2008-2009. The commitment of family income to private spending on dental care was calculated by dividing the mean annual per capita household spending on dental care by the mean annual per capita income, classified in four categories: > 0%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 10%, and ≥ 20%. Analysis of income commitment only included households with positive spending. Only 2,961 households (7%) reported positive spending on dental care. Mean annual per capita spending was BRL 42.19 (USD 12.78) overall and BRL 602.47 (USD 182.57) among those with positive spending. Households with the highest absolute expenditures on dental care were those from urban areas and the wealthiest quintile. Meanwhile, households with the highest proportional income commitment were from rural areas and the poorest quintile. Among those that reported positive spending, 55% of the households in the poorest quintile committed ≥ 20% of their income to dental care. The proportion was only 6% in the wealthiest quintile of the population. The poorest households in the wealthiest regions of Brazil (Central, South, and Southeast) showed the highest income commitments. There were striking socioeconomic inequalities in spending and income commitment to dental care. The evaluation of these inequalities is relevant for the evaluation and orientation of public health policies.

O objetivo foi investigar as desigualdades no comprometimento da renda domiciliar com gastos privados em assistência odontológica no Brasil. Foram analisados dados de 55.970 domicílios brasileiros que participaram da Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares, de abrangência nacional, no período de 2008-2009. O comprometimento dos gastos privados com assistência odontológica na renda familiar foi calculado pela divisão do gasto médio domiciliar per capita anual pela renda familiar per capita anual e estimado segundo quatro categorias: > 0%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 10% e ≥ 20%. A análise do comprometimento na renda foi realizada apenas para os domicílios com gasto positivo. Apenas 2.961 (7%) dos domicílios reportaram gastos positivos com assistência em odontologia. No geral, o gasto médio per capita anual foi de R$ 42,19 e, de R$ 602,47 entre aqueles com gasto positivo. Os domicílios que possuem os maiores gastos absolutos com assistência odontológica são aquelas pertencentes à área urbana e ao quinto mais rico. Em contrapartida, os domicílios com maior comprometimento na renda pertencem à área rural e ao quinto mais pobre. Entre os que informaram gasto positivo, 55% dos domicílios do quinto mais pobre comprometeram ≥ 20% de sua renda com assistência odontológica. O percentual é de apenas 6% no grupo mais rico da população. Os domicílios mais pobres das regiões mais ricas (Centro-oeste, Sul e Sudeste) apresentaram os maiores comprometimentos de renda. As desigualdades socioeconômicas nos gastos e no comprometimento de renda com assistência odontológica são evidentes. A avaliação dessas desigualdades torna-se relevante para avaliação e orientação de políticas públicas em saúde.

El objetivo de este trabajo fue investigar las desigualdades en el desembolso de renta domiciliaria con gastos privados en asistencia odontológica en Brasil. Se analizaron datos de 55.970 domicilios brasileños que participaron en la Encuesta de Presupuestos Familiares, de alcance nacional, durante el período de 2008-2009. El desembolso económico privado en asistencia odontológica, respecto a la renta familiar, se calculó mediante la división del gasto medio domiciliario per cápita anual por la renta familiar per cápita anual y estimado según cuatro categorías: > 0%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 10% y ≥ 20%. El análisis del desembolso económico se realizó sólo para los domicilios con gasto positivo. Sólo 2.961 (7%) de los domicilios informaron de gastos positivos con asistencia en odontología. En general, el gasto medio per cápita anual fue BRL 42,19 y, BRL 602,47 entre quienes contaban con un gasto positivo. Los domicilios que cuentan con los mayores gastos absolutos respecto a la asistencia odontológica son los pertenecientes al área urbana y a la quinta parte más rica. En contrapartida, los domicilios con mayor desembolso de renta pertenecen al área rural y a la quinta parte más pobre. Entre los que informaron de gasto positivo, un 55% de los domicilios de la quinta parte más pobre desembolsaron un ≥ 20% de su renta en asistencia odontológica. El porcentaje es de apenas un 6% en el grupo más rico de la población. Los domicilios más pobres de las regiones más ricas (Centro-oeste, Sur y Sudeste) presentaron los mayores desembolsos de renta. Las desigualdades socioeconómicas en los gastos y en el desembolso de renta con la asistencia odontológica son evidentes. La evaluación de estas desigualdades es relevante para la evaluación y orientación de las políticas públicas en salud.

Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of dental care services during early childhood: an epidemiological survey.

BACKGROUND: The use of dental care services contributes to the improvement of children's healthy behaviors, reducing the prevalence of future dental problems. In this way, the purpose of this study was to describe the use of dental care service during early childhood and the possible socioeconomic inequalities in this use. DESIGN: Data from the Brazilian Oral Health Survey (SB Brasil, 2010) were used. Interviews with the children's parents and clinical examinations with the children were conducted in a 5-year-old representative sample. Descriptive, bivariate and multiple hierarchical statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: Of the 7241 children included, 3812 (53.2%) had used dental care services at least once in their lifetimes, and 1872 (48.8%) had used services for check-up/prevention. The use of dental services was greater among children with a higher family income (P < 0.05). The use of check-ups was lower among children with non-White skin color (Black and Browns) and among those who did not live in state capitals (P < 0.05). Clinical conditions and self-perception were also associated with the use (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic differences in the general use of dental care and in its use for check-ups were identified during early childhood, indicating the presence of inequalities.

Iniquidades na assistência odontológica ao longo do curso de vida de jovens: um estudo de coorte / Inequalities in dental care during the life course of young people: a cohort study

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a assistência odontológica sob a perspectiva do "life course", bem como seus fatores determinantes, em jovens no município de Sobral, Ceará, Brasil. Realizou-se um estudo de coorte com ondas em 2000, 2006 e 2012 com 482 jovens atualmente entre 17 e 21 anos. Foram investigados dois desfechos: a assistência odontológica imediata e a ausência de assistência odontológica, baseados na trajetória dentária em relação ao tratamento restaurador. E como variáveis independentes, utilizaram-se as condições socioeconômicas e utilização de serviços e ações de saúde bucal nas três ondas investigadas. Observou-se que piores condições socioeconômicas ao longo da vida apresentaram-se como fator de risco para ausência da assistência odontológica e o efeito inverso foi observado com a imediata. A participação em grupos de adolescentes também apresentou relação com a maior assistência odontológica, bem como receber informação sobre saúde bucal. Este estudo revelou a presença de iniquidades na assistência odontológica ao longo da vida da população estudada.

Abstract The scope of this study was to investigate dental care from the life course perspective and its determinant factors among young people in the city of Sobral, State of Ceará, Brazil. A cohort study was conducted with waves in 2000, 2006 and 2012 with 482 young people aged between 17 and 21 years. Two outcomes were investigated: immediate dental care and the lack of dental care, based on the dental trajectory in relation to restorative treatment. Socioeconomic conditions and recourse to oral health services and actions in the three waves investigated were used as independent variables. It was found that low socioeconomic status throughout life presented itself as a risk factor for lack of dental care and the inverse effect was observed with immediate dental care. Participation in groups of teenagers was also related to dental care, as well as receiving information on oral health. This study revealed the presence of inequalities in dental care throughout the life course of the population assessed.

Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the quality of posterior restorations (amalgam or composite) placed in adults from a birth cohort and its association with clinical and socioeconomic determinants experienced during their life course. METHODS: A representative sample (n=539) of all 5914 births occurring in Pelotas (Brazil) in 1982 was prospectively investigated. Quality of posterior restorations (satisfactory or unsatisfactory) was assessed at 31 yrs-old, using modified USPHS criteria. Trained and calibrated dentists performed clinical examination. Explanatory variables included demographic and socioeconomic, oral health and dental service utilization patterns during the life course. Tooth related variables (type of tooth, material, size of cavity) were also analyzed. Untreated caries and socioeconomic status were assessed by group-based trajectories analyses. Multilevel Regression models were used to determine factors associated with restoration outcomes. RESULTS: In total 2123 restorations (53% composite) were evaluated of which 107 (5%) were assessed as failed. The main reasons for failure were tooth/restoration fracture (50.5%) and secondary caries (30.7%). Failures in posterior restorations showed a significant association with socioeconomic aspects (lower tertile of income at age 30 - prevalence ratio (PR) 2.21 [95% CI 1.19-4.09]), clinical variables (trajectory of higher untreated caries - PR 2.11 [95% CI 1.23-3.61]) and also with tooth-related factors (Restorations involving three or more surfaces - PR 5.51 [95% CI 3.30-9.19]) after adjustment for each other. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, although tooth-related variables have an important role in restoration longevity, patient-related factors, such as socioeconomic variables and untreated caries are also associated with failure and should be taken into account when evaluating longevity of posterior restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This was the first study assessing long-term trajectory of untreated caries, showing an association between higher experience of caries during the life-course and unsatisfactory restorations. The findings suggest that individual related factors should be considered when planning treatment and in future research evaluating the longevity of dental restorations.

[Inequalities in dental care during the life course of young people: a cohort study]. / Iniquidades na assistência odontológica ao longo do curso de vida de jovens: um estudo de coorte.

The scope of this study was to investigate dental care from the life course perspective and its determinant factors among young people in the city of Sobral, State of Ceará, Brazil. A cohort study was conducted with waves in 2000, 2006 and 2012 with 482 young people aged between 17 and 21 years. Two outcomes were investigated: immediate dental care and the lack of dental care, based on the dental trajectory in relation to restorative treatment. Socioeconomic conditions and recourse to oral health services and actions in the three waves investigated were used as independent variables. It was found that low socioeconomic status throughout life presented itself as a risk factor for lack of dental care and the inverse effect was observed with immediate dental care. Participation in groups of teenagers was also related to dental care, as well as receiving information on oral health. This study revealed the presence of inequalities in dental care throughout the life course of the population assessed.

O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a assistência odontológica sob a perspectiva do "life course", bem como seus fatores determinantes, em jovens no município de Sobral, Ceará, Brasil. Realizou-se um estudo de coorte com ondas em 2000, 2006 e 2012 com 482 jovens atualmente entre 17 e 21 anos. Foram investigados dois desfechos: a assistência odontológica imediata e a ausência de assistência odontológica, baseados na trajetória dentária em relação ao tratamento restaurador. E como variáveis independentes, utilizaram-se as condições socioeconômicas e utilização de serviços e ações de saúde bucal nas três ondas investigadas. Observou-se que piores condições socioeconômicas ao longo da vida apresentaram-se como fator de risco para ausência da assistência odontológica e o efeito inverso foi observado com a imediata. A participação em grupos de adolescentes também apresentou relação com a maior assistência odontológica, bem como receber informação sobre saúde bucal. Este estudo revelou a presença de iniquidades na assistência odontológica ao longo da vida da população estudada.

Desigualdades no comprometimento da renda domiciliar dos brasileiros com gastos privados em assistência odontológica / Inequalities in Brazilian families' income commitment to out-of-pocket spending on dental care / Desigualdades respecto a la renta domiciliaria en el desembolso de los brasileños con gastos privados de asistencia odontológica

O objetivo foi investigar as desigualdades no comprometimento da renda domiciliar com gastos privados em assistência odontológica no Brasil. Foram analisados dados de 55.970 domicílios brasileiros que participaram da Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares, de abrangência nacional, no período de 2008-2009. O comprometimento dos gastos privados com assistência odontológica na renda familiar foi calculado pela divisão do gasto médio domiciliar per capita anual pela renda familiar per capita anual e estimado segundo quatro categorias: > 0%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 10% e ≥ 20%. A análise do comprometimento na renda foi realizada apenas para os domicílios com gasto positivo. Apenas 2.961 (7%) dos domicílios reportaram gastos positivos com assistência em odontologia. No geral, o gasto médio per capita anual foi de R$ 42,19 e, de R$ 602,47 entre aqueles com gasto positivo. Os domicílios que possuem os maiores gastos absolutos com assistência odontológica são aquelas pertencentes à área urbana e ao quinto mais rico. Em contrapartida, os domicílios com maior comprometimento na renda pertencem à área rural e ao quinto mais pobre. Entre os que informaram gasto positivo, 55% dos domicílios do quinto mais pobre comprometeram ≥ 20% de sua renda com assistência odontológica. O percentual é de apenas 6% no grupo mais rico da população. Os domicílios mais pobres das regiões mais ricas (Centro-oeste, Sul e Sudeste) apresentaram os maiores comprometimentos de renda. As desigualdades socioeconômicas nos gastos e no comprometimento de renda com assistência odontológica são evidentes. A avaliação dessas desigualdades torna-se relevante para avaliação e orientação de políticas públicas em saúde.

The study aimed to investigate inequalities in the commitment of family income to private expenditures on dental care in Brazil. Data were analyzed from 55,970 Brazilian households that participated in the nationwide Family Budgets Survey in 2008-2009. The commitment of family income to private spending on dental care was calculated by dividing the mean annual per capita household spending on dental care by the mean annual per capita income, classified in four categories: > 0%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 10%, and ≥ 20%. Analysis of income commitment only included households with positive spending. Only 2,961 households (7%) reported positive spending on dental care. Mean annual per capita spending was BRL 42.19 (USD 12.78) overall and BRL 602.47 (USD 182.57) among those with positive spending. Households with the highest absolute expenditures on dental care were those from urban areas and the wealthiest quintile. Meanwhile, households with the highest proportional income commitment were from rural areas and the poorest quintile. Among those that reported positive spending, 55% of the households in the poorest quintile committed ≥ 20% of their income to dental care. The proportion was only 6% in the wealthiest quintile of the population. The poorest households in the wealthiest regions of Brazil (Central, South, and Southeast) showed the highest income commitments. There were striking socioeconomic inequalities in spending and income commitment to dental care. The evaluation of these inequalities is relevant for the evaluation and orientation of public health policies.

El objetivo de este trabajo fue investigar las desigualdades en el desembolso de renta domiciliaria con gastos privados en asistencia odontológica en Brasil. Se analizaron datos de 55.970 domicilios brasileños que participaron en la Encuesta de Presupuestos Familiares, de alcance nacional, durante el período de 2008-2009. El desembolso económico privado en asistencia odontológica, respecto a la renta familiar, se calculó mediante la división del gasto medio domiciliario per cápita anual por la renta familiar per cápita anual y estimado según cuatro categorías: > 0%, ≥ 5%, ≥ 10% y ≥ 20%. El análisis del desembolso económico se realizó sólo para los domicilios con gasto positivo. Sólo 2.961 (7%) de los domicilios informaron de gastos positivos con asistencia en odontología. En general, el gasto medio per cápita anual fue BRL 42,19 y, BRL 602,47 entre quienes contaban con un gasto positivo. Los domicilios que cuentan con los mayores gastos absolutos respecto a la asistencia odontológica son los pertenecientes al área urbana y a la quinta parte más rica. En contrapartida, los domicilios con mayor desembolso de renta pertenecen al área rural y a la quinta parte más pobre. Entre los que informaron de gasto positivo, un 55% de los domicilios de la quinta parte más pobre desembolsaron un ≥ 20% de su renta en asistencia odontológica. El porcentaje es de apenas un 6% en el grupo más rico de la población. Los domicilios más pobres de las regiones más ricas (Centro-oeste, Sur y Sudeste) presentaron los mayores desembolsos de renta. Las desigualdades socioeconómicas en los gastos y en el desembolso de renta con la asistencia odontológica son evidentes. La evaluación de estas desigualdades es relevante para la evaluación y orientación de las políticas públicas en salud.

[The interface between primary and secondary care in dentistry in the Unified Health System (SUS): an integrative systematic review]. / Interface entre a Atenção Primária e a Secundária em odontologia no Sistema Único de Saúde: uma revisão sistemática integrativa.

Secondary care in dentistry in Brazil has scarce and broadly underutilized resources. The challenge is to organize the interface between primary health care (PHC) and secondary care in order to consolidate the population's access to specialist dental care in the Unified Health System (SUS). This article seeks to analyze national publications in Portuguese and English on the interface between secondary health care and primary health care in dentistry from the perspective of comprehensive care in the SUS. It is an integrative review, considering the publications of the following databases: SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature) WEB OF SCIENCE, SCOPUS, PubMed (International Literature on Health Sciences) and GOOGLE SCHOLAR. The search located 966 articles, of which 12 were used in full. Coverage of the oral health teams (ESB) in the family health strategy (ESF), primary health care implementation in a structured way, access to secondary health care, counter-referral to PHC, development of indicators and socioeconomic conditions and inequalities in the distribution of dental specialist centers (CEO) are factors that influence the integrity of oral health care in the SUS.

Interface entre a Atenção Primária e a Secundária em odontologia no Sistema Único de Saúde: uma revisão sistemática integrativa / The interface between primary and secondary care in dentistry in the Unified Health System (SUS): an integrative systematic review

Resumo A atenção secundária em odontologia no Brasil apresenta recursos escassos e em grande parte subutilizados. O desafio consiste em realizar a interface entre a atenção primária à saúde (APS) e a atenção secundária de forma a consolidar o acesso da população à atenção odontológica especializada no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). O objetivo deste artigo é analisar publicações nacionais em língua portuguesa e inglesa sobre a interface entre a atenção secundária e a APS em odontologia na perspectiva da integralidade do cuidado no âmbito do SUS. Revisão integrativa considerando as publicações dos seguintes bancos de dados: SciELO (Scientific Eletronic Library Online), Lilacs (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed (Literatura Internacional em Ciências da Saúde) e Google Acadêmico. Foram encontrados 966 artigos, dos quais 12 foram utilizados na integra. A cobertura das equipes de saúde bucal (ESB) nas estratégias de saúde da família (ESF), a implantação da APS de forma estruturada, o acesso a atenção secundária, o contrarreferenciamento para APS, os indicadores de desenvolvimento e as condições socioeconômicas e desigualdades na distribuição dos CEO's são fatores que influenciam a integralidade do cuidado em saúde bucal no SUS.

Abstract Secondary care in dentistry in Brazil has scarce and broadly underutilized resources. The challenge is to organize the interface between primary health care (PHC) and secondary care in order to consolidate the population's access to specialist dental care in the Unified Health System (SUS). This article seeks to analyze national publications in Portuguese and English on the interface between secondary health care and primary health care in dentistry from the perspective of comprehensive care in the SUS. It is an integrative review, considering the publications of the following databases: SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature) WEB OF SCIENCE, SCOPUS, PubMed (International Literature on Health Sciences) and GOOGLE SCHOLAR. The search located 966 articles, of which 12 were used in full. Coverage of the oral health teams (ESB) in the family health strategy (ESF), primary health care implementation in a structured way, access to secondary health care, counter-referral to PHC, development of indicators and socioeconomic conditions and inequalities in the distribution of dental specialist centers (CEO) are factors that influence the integrity of oral health care in the SUS.

Oral health policy in Brazil between 2003 and 2014: scenarios, proposals, actions, and outcomes. / Política de Saúde Bucal no Brasil 2003-2014: cenário, propostas, ações e resultados.

This study examined the implementation of Brazil's National Oral Health Policy by the three governments during the period 2003 to 2014. It provides a general overview of oral health care scenarios and examines institutional proposals and actions developed by the executive branch based on the components of the health care system. A documental analysis was conducted using documents produced by key government agencies. The findings show that there was an increase in the provision and coverage of public dental services between 2003 and 2006 and that rates were maintained to a certain degree in subsequent periods (2007 to 2010 and 2011 to 2014). There was an expansion in government funding, human resources and infrastructure. The amount of funds transferred to state and local governments increased from 83.4 million in 2003 to 916 million in 2014, equivalent to a 10.9 fold increase. However, the use of public dental services remained stable, with only a slight increase from 29.7% in 2003 to 30.7% in 2008, while private service utilization increased from 64.4% in 2003 to 74.3% in 2013. The care model component was given lowest priority by the three governments. This shortcoming influences policy effectiveness and requires the adoption of future measures by healthcare managers and officials to correct the situation.

Política de Saúde Bucal no Brasil 2003-2014: cenário, propostas, ações e resultados / Oral health policy in Brazil between 2003 and 2014: scenarios, proposals, actions, and outcomes

Resumo Este estudo analisou a implementação da Política de Saúde Bucal no Brasil de 2003 a 2014, caracterizando cenários, ações institucionais do poder executivo nos componentes do sistema de saúde em três governos. Realizou-se análise documental das tomadas de decisão da Coordenação Geral de Saúde Bucal do Ministério da Saúde através de documentos de setores estratégicos do governo disponíveis nos sítios da internet, como portal da transparência e Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Este estudo apontou crescimento na oferta e cobertura potencial de serviços públicos odontológicos entre 2003 e 2006 e certa manutenção nos períodos 2007-2010 e 2011-2014. Houve ampliação do financiamento nominal, infraestrutura e recursos humanos. Os recursos repassados para estados e municípios passaram de 83,4 milhões em 2003 para 916 milhões em 2014, aumento de 10,9 vezes no período. O uso dos serviços odontológicos no SUS entre 2003-2008 manteve-se constante em torno de 30%. Houve aumento do uso dos serviços odontológicos privados (64,4% em 2003, 69,6% em 2008 e 74,3% em 2013). O componente do modelo de atenção foi o menos abordado nos três governos, constituindo-se em lacuna com repercussões nos resultados requerendo adoção de medidas futuras por parte dos gestores.

Abstract This study examined the implementation of Brazil’s National Oral Health Policy by the three governments during the period 2003 to 2014. It provides a general overview of oral health care scenarios and examines institutional proposals and actions developed by the executive branch based on the components of the health care system. A documental analysis was conducted using documents produced by key government agencies. The findings show that there was an increase in the provision and coverage of public dental services between 2003 and 2006 and that rates were maintained to a certain degree in subsequent periods (2007 to 2010 and 2011 to 2014). There was an expansion in government funding, human resources and infrastructure. The amount of funds transferred to state and local governments increased from 83.4 million in 2003 to 916 million in 2014, equivalent to a 10.9 fold increase. However, the use of public dental services remained stable, with only a slight increase from 29.7% in 2003 to 30.7% in 2008, while private service utilization increased from 64.4% in 2003 to 74.3% in 2013. The care model component was given lowest priority by the three governments. This shortcoming influences policy effectiveness and requires the adoption of future measures by healthcare managers and officials to correct the situation.

Estimating Premium and Out-of-Pocket Outlays Under All Child Dental Coverage Options in the Federally Facilitated Marketplace.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate premium and out-of-pocket costs for child dental care services under various dental coverage options offered within the federally facilitated marketplace. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated premium and out-of-pocket costs for child dental care services for 12 patient profiles, which vary by dental care use and spending. We did this for 1039 medical plans that include child dental coverage, 2703 medical plans that do not include child dental coverage, and 583 stand-alone dental plans for the 2015 plan year. Our analysis is based on plan data from the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight and Data.HealthCare.Gov. RESULTS: On average, expected total financial outlays for child dental care services were lower when dental coverage was embedded within a medical plan compared with the alternative of a stand-alone dental plan. The difference, however, in average expected out-of-pocket spending varied significantly for our 12 patient profiles. Older children who are very high users of dental care, for example, have lower expected out-of-pocket costs under a stand-alone dental plan. For the vast majority of other age groups and dental care use profiles, the reverse holds. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that embedding dental coverage within medical plans, on average, results in lower total financial outlays for child beneficiaries. Although our results are specific to the federally facilitated marketplace, they hold lessons for both state-based marketplaces and the general private health insurance and dental benefits market, as well.

Barrier to Access or Cost Share? Coinsurance and Dental-Care Utilization in Colombia.

BACKGROUND: Copayments, deductibles, and coinsurance, are elements of health-care systems to make prices salient for the insured. Individuals may respond differently to cost sharing, according to the type of care they seek; dental care, as a combination of both acute and elective care, is an ideal setting to study the effects of cost-sharing mechanisms on utilization. OBJECTIVE: To test how coinsurance affects dental-care utilization in a middle-income country context. METHODS: This study uses policy variations in the Colombian health-care system to analyze changes in dental-care utilization due to different levels of coinsurance. We used matching procedures to balance observed differences in pre-treatment variables between those who face coinsurance (non-policy holders, or beneficiaries) and those who don't (policyholders). We use zero-inflated negative binomial models for the count of visits and two-part models for total expenditures, and test for unobservable confounders with random-effect models and instrumental variables. RESULTS: Individuals who face coinsurance are less likely to have any dental-care utilization, at a relatively small scale. Facing coinsurance does not correlate with changes in total expenditures. Falsification tests with dental-care visits exempt from coinsurance show no statistically distinguishable changes in utilization. Random-effect models and instrumental variable models show results similar to the main specification. CONCLUSIONS: Cost-sharing policies in Colombia seem to be well designed because they don't represent an important barrier to dental-care access.