The Economic Impact of Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that affects over 30 million people in the United States. Given the large and growing prevalence of AD, the associated economic burden is significant. It has been estimated that AD costs over $5 billion dollars annually. These costs include both direct and indirect costs. Direct costs include prescription medicines, visits to health-care providers, hospitalizations, and transportation. Indirect costs include missed days or lost productivity at work or school, career modification, and reduced quality of life. Understanding and measuring these costs can be accomplished through rigorous economic evaluation, which is the organized process of considering inputs and outcomes of various activities. Economic evaluation has been used to contextualize the burden of AD in society. It has also been used to inform patients, providers, and other stakeholders on how to deliver the most evidence-based, efficient way possible. Understanding the economic impact of atopic dermatitis is an important aspect of delivering high-quality care.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of abrocitinib compared with standard of care in adult moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in Japan.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a significant clinical, economic, and human burden. The JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety (JADE) program's Phase 3 trials demonstrated that as a treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in adults with previous exposure to immunotherapy, abrocitinib showed superior efficacy and safety compared with standard of care (SoC), consisting of topical corticosteroids. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of abrocitinib with SoC versus SoC alone for this patient population in Japan from a societal perspective. A hybrid decision tree and Markov model were used to capture the initial treatment and long-term maintenance phases. Clinical inputs at 16 weeks were obtained through a Bayesian network meta-analysis of four pivotal trials from the JADE program. Clinical inputs at 52 weeks were derived from the JADE EXTEND trial. Response-specific utility inputs were obtained from published literature. Resource use, costs, and productivity inputs were gathered from Japanese claims analysis, literature, public documents, and expert opinion. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 2.0% per year and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to validate the base case results and explore a payer perspective. Over a lifetime horizon and with the base-case societal perspective, abrocitinib produced a mean gain of 0.75 QALYs, incremental costs of JPY (¥) 2 270 386 (USD [$] 17 265.6), and a resulting ICER of ¥3 034 514 ($23 076.5) per QALY compared with SoC. From a payer perspective, the incremental costs increased to ¥4 476 777 ($34 044.4), with an ICER of ¥5 983 495 ($45 502.6) per QALY. The results were most sensitive to treatment-specific, response-based utility weights, drug costs, and productivity-related inputs. From a Japanese societal perspective, abrocitinib demonstrated superior QALYs and with a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥5 000 000 ($38 023.4) per QALY, can be considered cost-effective compared with SoC as a treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in adult patients with previous immunosuppressant exposure.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Resource Use and Costs in Adult Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Receiving Systemic Treatment: Derma-Atopic Study in Spain / Características de los pacientes, patrones de tratamiento, uso de recursos y costes en adultos con dermatitis atópica moderada-grave en la práctica habitual en España: Estudio Derma-Atopic

Background Moderate–severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has a significant impact on patients’ lives, with many requiring systemic treatment to manage symptoms (e.g., pruritus). Several drugs are used off-label to treat AD. This study describes sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, health resource use (HRU) and costs in adults with AD who initiated systemic treatment or phototherapy in routine practice. Methods This retrospective observational study of electronic medical records in the BIG-PAC database identified adults with prior diagnosis of AD (ICD-9: 691.8 or 692.9) starting oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologics or phototherapy between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. Patients were followed for 3 years from treatment initiation, up to 31/12/2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRU and costs were analyzed descriptively. Results Patients (N = 1995) had a mean age of 60 years, 64% were female, with a mean time of 23 years since diagnosis (84% were ≥18 years at AD onset). Main comorbidities were anxiety (38%), arterial hypertension (36%) and dyslipidemia (35%). Most patients used oral corticosteroids as first systemic (84%; median duration 29 days) and immunosuppressants in 13% of patients (median duration 117 days, 5% cyclosporine and 4% methotrexate). Half of patients required a second line systemic and 12% a third line. The use of immunosuppressants and biologics increased with treatment lines. About 13% of patients received systemic treatments continuously over the 3-year follow-up. The average 3-year per patient cost was 3835 euros, with an average annual cost of 1278 euros. Conclusions Results suggest a high comorbidity and economic burden in this real-world adult population with AD, and the need for systemic treatments indicated for use in AD (AU)

Antecedentes La dermatitis atópica (DA) moderada-grave tiene un impacto significativo en la vida de los pacientes, muchos de los cuales requieren tratamiento sistémico para controlar los síntomas (p. ej., prurito). Algunos tratamientos son usados fuera de indicación. Este estudio describió características sociodemográficas y clínicas, patrones de tratamiento, uso de recursos sanitarios (URS) y costes asociados en adultos con DA que iniciaron tratamiento sistémico o fototerapia en la práctica habitual. Métodos Este estudio observacional retrospectivo de historias clínicas electrónicas en la base de datos BIG-PAC identificó adultos con diagnóstico previo de DA (CIE-9: 691.8 o 692.9) que comenzaron con corticosteroides orales, inmunosupresores, biológicos o fototerapia entre el 01/01/2012 y el 31/12/2016. Se siguió a los pacientes durante 3 años desde el inicio del tratamiento, hasta 31/12/2019. Los datos sobre las características clínicas de los pacientes, patrones de tratamiento, URS y costes se analizaron de forma descriptiva. Resultados Los pacientes (N = 1995) tenían una edad media de 60 años, el 64% eran mujeres, con una media de 23 años desde el diagnóstico (84% tenían ≥ 18 años al inicio de la DA). Las principales comorbilidades fueron ansiedad (38%), hipertensión arterial (36%) y dislipidemia (35%). La mayoría de los pacientes utilizaron corticosteroides orales como primer tratamiento sistémico (84%; duración media 29 días) e inmunosupresores en el 13% de los pacientes (duración media 117 días, ciclosporina en el 5% y metotrexato en el 4%). La mitad de los pacientes requirieron una segunda línea de tratamiento sistémico y el 12% una tercera. El uso de inmunosupresores y biológicos aumentó simultáneamente con las líneas de tratamiento. Aproximadamente el 13% de los pacientes recibieron tratamientos sistémicos de forma continua durante los 3 años de seguimiento. El coste medio por paciente a 3 años fue de 3.835 euros, con un coste medio anual de 1.278 euros (AU)

[Artículo traducido] Características de los pacientes, patrones de tratamiento, uso de recursos y costes en adultos con dermatitis atópica moderada-grave en la práctica habitual en España: Estudio Derma-Atopic / Real-World Treatment Patterns, Resource Use and Costs in Adult Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Receiving Systemic Treatment: Derma-Atopic Study in Spain

Antecedentes La dermatitis atópica (DA) moderada-grave tiene un impacto significativo en la vida de los pacientes, muchos de los cuales requieren tratamiento sistémico para controlar los síntomas (p. ej., prurito). Algunos tratamientos son usados fuera de indicación. Este estudio describió características sociodemográficas y clínicas, patrones de tratamiento, uso de recursos sanitarios (URS) y costes asociados en adultos con DA que iniciaron tratamiento sistémico o fototerapia en la práctica habitual. Métodos Este estudio observacional retrospectivo de historias clínicas electrónicas en la base de datos BIG-PAC identificó adultos con diagnóstico previo de DA (CIE-9: 691.8 o 692.9) que comenzaron con corticosteroides orales, inmunosupresores, biológicos o fototerapia entre el 01/01/2012 y el 31/12/2016. Se siguió a los pacientes durante 3 años desde el inicio del tratamiento, hasta 31/12/2019. Los datos sobre las características clínicas de los pacientes, patrones de tratamiento, URS y costes se analizaron de forma descriptiva. Resultados Los pacientes (N = 1995) tenían una edad media de 60 años, el 64% eran mujeres, con una media de 23 años desde el diagnóstico (84% tenían ≥ 18 años al inicio de la DA). Las principales comorbilidades fueron ansiedad (38%), hipertensión arterial (36%) y dislipidemia (35%). La mayoría de los pacientes utilizaron corticosteroides orales como primer tratamiento sistémico (84%; duración media 29 días) e inmunosupresores en el 13% de los pacientes (duración media 117 días, ciclosporina en el 5% y metotrexato en el 4%). La mitad de los pacientes requirieron una segunda línea de tratamiento sistémico y el 12% una tercera. El uso de inmunosupresores y biológicos aumentó simultáneamente con las líneas de tratamiento. Aproximadamente el 13% de los pacientes recibieron tratamientos sistémicos de forma continua durante los 3 años de seguimiento. El coste medio por paciente a 3 años fue de 3.835 euros, con un coste medio anual de 1.278 euros (AU)

Background Moderate–severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has a significant impact on patients’ lives, with many requiring systemic treatment to manage symptoms (e.g., pruritus). Several drugs are used off-label to treat AD. This study describes sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, health resource use (HRU) and costs in adults with AD who initiated systemic treatment or phototherapy in routine practice. Methods This retrospective observational study of electronic medical records in the BIG-PAC database identified adults with prior diagnosis of AD (ICD-9: 691.8 or 692.9) starting oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologics or phototherapy between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. Patients were followed for 3 years from treatment initiation, up to 31/12/2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRU and costs were analyzed descriptively. Results Patients (N = 1995) had a mean age of 60 years, 64% were female, with a mean time of 23 years since diagnosis (84% were ≥18 years at AD onset). Main comorbidities were anxiety (38%), arterial hypertension (36%) and dyslipidemia (35%). Most patients used oral corticosteroids as first systemic (84%; median duration 29 days) and immunosuppressants in 13% of patients (median duration 117 days, 5% cyclosporine and 4% methotrexate). Half of patients required a second line systemic and 12% a third line. The use of immunosuppressants and biologics increased with treatment lines. About 13% of patients received systemic treatments continuously over the 3-year follow-up. The average 3-year per patient cost was 3835 euros, with an average annual cost of 1278 euros. Conclusions Results suggest a high comorbidity and economic burden in this real-world adult population with AD, and the need for systemic treatments indicated for use in AD (AU)

Exacerbating factors and disease burden in patients with atopic dermatitis.

The number of patients with atopic dermatitis is on the rise worldwide, and Japan is no exception. According to recent estimates of the percentage of patients with atopic dermatitis in Japan by age, the majority of patients are between 20 and 44 years old. Because the peak age of onset of atopic dermatitis is during infancy, many patients may experience prolonged symptoms from infancy to adulthood. A prolonged clinical course also increases the burden of atopic dermatitis on affected patients. Decreased productivity due to work disruptions, reduced daily activity, higher direct medical costs, fatigue, and daytime sleepiness due to sleep disturbances are typical burdens on patients with atopic dermatitis. In order to reduce these burdens, it is necessary to shorten its clinical course and achieve long-term control without relying on medications, possibly by using avoidance or coping measures of aggravating factors. Typical aggravating factors of atopic dermatitis include irritant dermatitis, food allergy in children, sweating, and psychological stress in adults. Food allergy places a heavy burden on the quality of life of affected patients and their families. The effectiveness of educational interventions for sweating and psychological stress is unclear. We must also evaluate the economic burden and cost-effectiveness of interventions on the patient as aggravating factors to be addressed.

The direct and indirect costs of adult atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is considered a childhood illness, and the direct and indirect health care burden of atopic dermatitis in adults is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To measure the direct and indirect costs of atopic dermatitis among adults in 2018. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared commercial and Medicare-insured adults with atopic dermatitis in 2018 with directly matched (1:3) adults without atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis prevalence was reported. Health care utilization, direct health care costs, and work loss data were compared between cohorts. This analysis was repeated for adults with atopic dermatitis in 2016 and 2017. RESULTS: 31,164 adults with atopic dermatitis in 2018 were identified and directly matched (1:3) to controls. Adults with atopic dermatitis had greater utilization of outpatient services, outpatient pharmacy services, and short-term disability benefits than controls. Unadjusted annual health care costs in 2018 were $4,979 higher for adults with atopic dermatitis ($14,603) than for the matched controls ($9,624), driven by outpatient services and pharmacy. Findings were supported by analyses of adults from 2016 and 2017 and multivariable analyses. One limitation of this study was that patients with mild cases of atopic dermatitis may not seek medical treatment and may be underrepresented in the study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The direct health care and indirect (short-term disability) health care costs of atopic dermatitis present a significant health care burden among the adult population. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Employees of Eli Lilly were involved in the planning, execution, and interpretation of the study. Pierce is employed by Eli Lilly and Company. Boytsov and Goldblum were employed by Eli Lilly and Company Health at the time this research was conducted. Manjelievskaia and Brouillette are employed by IBM Watson Health, which received funding from Eli Lilly and Company to conduct this study. Bonafede and Onyekwere were employed at IBM Watson Health at the time this research was conducted.

Financial Burden of Atopic Dermatitis Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenses in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with considerable financial cost. However, the full burden of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the OOP health care expenses associated with AD management. METHODS: A 25-question voluntary online survey was administered to National Eczema Association members worldwide (n = 113,502). Inclusion criteria (US residents age ≥18 years who either self-reported had AD or were primary caregivers of individuals with AD) were met by 77.3% (1118/1447) of respondents. RESULTS: Respondents reported OOP expenses in 3 categories: (1) health care providers and prescriptions, including health care provider visit deductibles (68.7% [686]), prescription co-pays (64.3% [635]), and prescriptions not covered by insurance (48.6% [468]); (2) nonprescription health care products, including moisturizers (94.3% [934]), hygiene products (85.0% [824], allergy medications (75.1% [715]), itch relievers (68.25% [647]), dietary supplements (52.2% [491]), and sleep aids (37.0% [336]); and (3) complementary approaches, including cleaning products (74.7% [732]), clothing/bedding (44.8% [430]), alternative medications (19.0% [180]), and adjunctive therapies (15.9% [150]). The median annual AD OOP expense was US $600 (range, US $0-$200,000), with 41.9% (364) reporting expenditures US $1000 or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-pocket expenses place a significant financial burden on individuals with AD. Additional studies are needed to better understand associations and impact of OOP costs.

Atopic dermatitis in specialized centers in Spain: a retrospective analysis of incidence and costs (2000-2017).

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that has substantial effects on patients' quality of life, with a prevalence between 2.2% and 17.6% worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the use of specialized care resources generated by children and adults with atopic dermatitis, and the associated direct medical costs. METHODS: Admission details from patients admitted in specialized healthcare centers (inpatient and outpatient care) in Spain between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017 were analyzed in a retrospective multicentre study. RESULTS: Records corresponded to 3036 patients, 1266 aged 5 years or younger. Comorbid conditions corresponded to skin infections and respiratory difficulties (asthma, bronchiectasis). Hospital incidence of atopic dermatitis was 5.8 per 100,000 persons, stable over the study period, and 30.0 per 100,000 in those aged 5 years and younger. Mean annual direct medical cost per patient was €2469. Overall, direct medical costs per patient increased significantly over the study period (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Hospital incidence of atopic dermatitis remained stable over the study period, which is in contrast with the increasing incidence reported by the Spanish government in primary care centers. The increase in direct medical costs of specialized care responded to the increase in treatment costs.

Does location matter? Geographic variations in healthcare resource use for atopic dermatitis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown which region of the U.S. offers the best and worst access to care for atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) from 1996 to 2015 to compare healthcare resource use and cost of AD among U.S. census regions. We conducted multivariable regression analyses adjusting for clinicodemographic factors to evaluate regional differences in healthcare resource use and cost per patient per year (PPPY) in terms of ambulatory visits, ED visits, and medications directly attributable to AD. RESULTS: An estimated total of 6,348,578 (95% CI: 5,944,553-6,752,803) AD patients (weighted) were pooled. Compared to the remainder of the country, Midwest AD patients utilized the fewest ambulatory visits (0.55 versus 0.75 visits PPPY; p = .035). The proportion of patients with ≥1 ED visits was highest in the Midwest (7.1%), followed by the South (5.4%), Northeast (4.8%), and West (1.4%). Within the Midwest AD population, those with no ambulatory visits per year utilized nearly three times more ED visits when compared with those with one or more ambulatory visits per year (0.11 versus 0.04 visits PPPY; p = .019). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Midwest AD patients have differential access to outpatient care, which may be resulting in higher ED usage.

Psychosocial burden and out-of-pocket costs in patients with atopic dermatitis in Ireland.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases in the developed world, affecting 1-3% of the adult population in Europe. This inflammatory disease can have a marked impact on affected individuals, leading to significant impairment in physical wellbeing and quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to investigate the psychosocial impact and financial burden of AD on patients in Ireland. To increase our understanding of the psychosocial and financial aspects of AD disease burden in the Irish population, an online survey was designed. The survey was launched by the Irish Skin Foundation, and included questions focusing on disease severity, disease control, psychosocial impact, interrupted sleep, missed work and school days, and financial cost. The survey showed that the impact of AD on QoL was profound. The survey demonstrated that 85% of adults described interrupted sleep, 70% reported social anxiety, 65% avoid exercise and sports, 52% avoid social activities, 52% avoid sexual intimacy and 43% feel they are depressed as a result of their AD. Approximately one-quarter of those surveyed can spend up to €2300 annually on over-the-counter, prescription and alternative treatments. This study has shown the significant impact AD has on patients living in Ireland. It also highlights that out-of-pocket costs for patients is higher compared with previous studies across European countries.

Effects of variations in access to care for children with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: An estimated 50% of children in the US are Medicaid-insured. Some of these patients have poor health literacy and limited access to medications and specialty care. These factors affect treatment utilization for pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), the most common inflammatory skin disease in children. This study assesses and compares treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) between large cohorts of Medicaid and commercially insured children with AD. METHODS: Pediatric patients with AD were identified from 2 large US healthcare claims databases (2011-2016). Included patients had continuous health plan eligibility for ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after the first AD diagnosis (index date). Patients with an autoimmune disease diagnosis within 6 months of the index date were excluded. Treatment patterns and all-cause and AD-related HCRU during the observation period were compared between commercially and Medicaid-insured children. RESULTS: A minority of children were evaluated by a dermatology or allergy/immunology specialist. Several significant differences were observed between commercially and Medicaid-insured children with AD. Disparities detected for Medicaid-insured children included: comparatively fewer received specialist care, emergency department and urgent care center utilization was higher, a greater proportion had asthma and non-atopic morbidities, high- potency topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors were less often prescribed, and prescriptions for antihistamines were more than three times higher, despite similar rates of comorbid asthma and allergies among antihistamine users. Treatment patterns also varied substantially across physician specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest barriers in accessing specialty care for all children with AD and significant differences in management between commercially and Medicaid-insured children. These disparities in treatment and access to specialty care may contribute to poor AD control, especially in Medicaid-insured patients.

Pearls for Managing Atopic Dermatitis in Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis presenting with inflamed and itchy skin. Recent studies have shown an inverse relationship between socioeconomic status and the severity of AD. Low socioeconomic status (LSES) individuals with AD face specific barriers that may impede management. These include forgoing doctor's appointments due to transportation costs, inability to take time off from work, and lack of affordable childcare services. Unaffordable medications and over-the-counter products for managing AD further present as significant challenges for LSES patients. This article aims to offer practical and affordable recommendations to help mitigate the challenges faced by LSES patients with AD and thereby alleviate disease burden and improve treatment outcomes.

Burden and socioeconomics of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and food allergy.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy affect approximately 20% of the global population. Few studies describe the burden of the totality of these diseases and only a handful studies provide a comprehensive overview of the socioeconomic impact of these diseases. AREAS COVERED: For this narrative review, we searched Pubmed using selected keywords and inspected relevant references using a snowballing process. We provide an overview of the socioeconomic burden of allergic diseases (in particular, asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy). The focus of this review is on their epidemiology (incidence, prevalence), burden (disability-adjusted life years, quality of life), and direct and indirect costs (absenteeism and presenteeism). We have put special emphasis on differences between countries. EXPERT COMMENTARY: Both the prevalence and the burden of allergic diseases are considerable with prevalence varying between 1% and 20%. We identified a plethora of studies on asthma, but studies were generally difficult to compare due to the heterogeneity in measures used. There were only few studies on the burden of food allergy; therefore, more studies on this allergy are required. For future studies, we recommend standardizing epidemiologic, socioeconomic impact, and quality of life measures of allergic diseases.

Factors and cost associated with atopic dermatitis in Nevada.

Objectives: Atopic dermatitis, or eczema, is an inflammatory illness that impacts individuals of all ages. The cost of treating AD and the impact on the quality of life have not been well documented in the state of Nevada. This study seeks to fill this gap by identifying factors that impact the cost of AD in the state utilizing clinical and patient demographics. Methods: ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment was performed using a large hospital utilization database to examine the cost of AD in the state of Nevada across all hospital settings. Results: Several significant factors were associated with the overall cost of AD in Nevada, including hospital setting type (outpatient vs. inpatient), physician type, region, AD diagnosis level, and age (p < 0.05). Stratified analysis was performed by setting type. In the inpatient setting, region, diagnosis level, and records with age listed between 0 and 5 years remained significant (p < 0.05). In the outpatient setting, physician type, region, and African American race remained significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Data from this study indicate that the AD cost burden is dependent on both demographic and clinical factors in the state of Nevada. These differences suggest that patients with AD may encounter higher costs depending on age, race, and clinical factors.

[The annual cost of medical care for patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in Mexico. A multicenter study]. / Costo anual de la atención médica de pacientes con dermatitis atópica moderada a grave en México. Estudio multicéntrico.

BACKGROUND: In Mexico, the economic burden of medical care for patients with atopic dermatitis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the annual direct medical costs of the treatment for patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis who receive medical attention at "Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado" (Institute for Social Security and Social Services for State Workers, better known as ISSSTE), as well as the main variables associated with it. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Clinical records of patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis were reviewed and a multivariate analysis was designed by using a generalized linear model. RESULTS: 65 patients were included; 41 of them (63.07 %) had moderate atopic dermatitis, and 24 (36.92 %) had severe AD; 39 (60 %) of them were female patients. In groups with severe atopic dermatitis, statistically significant differences were observed in matters of the duration of the evolution of the disease, comorbidities, intense pruritus, and depression. The average annual cost of medical care for patients with moderate atopic dermatitis was 1527 ± 623 USD, and for patients with severe atopic dermatitis the cost was 9487 ± 8990 USD. Significant differences were observed in dermatology consultations, referrals, laboratory and diagnostic studies, and the number of drugs prescribed by physicians. With the multivariate analysis, it was identified that the highest cost was presented by severe patients (p = 0.0001) who were younger and had comorbidities, along with diagnosis of depression. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of atopic dermatitis, the age average, the presence of comorbidities, and the diagnosis of depression are the variables with the highest association and impact on the direct cost of medical care.

Antecedentes: En México se desconoce el impacto económico de la atención médica de los pacientes con dermatitis atópica. Objetivo: Determinar los costos médicos directos anuales del tratamiento de pacientes con dermatitis atópica moderada y grave que se atienden en el Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado, y las principales variables asociadas. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico de cohorte retrospectiva. Se revisaron los expedientes clínicos de pacientes con dermatitis atópica clasificada como moderada o grave y se diseñó un modelo de análisis multivariado mediante un modelo lineal generalizado. Resultados: Se incluyeron 65 pacientes, 41 (63.07 %) tuvieron dermatitis atópica moderada y 24 (36.92 %), grave; 39 (60 %) fueron del sexo femenino. En los grupos con dermatitis atópica grave se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en años de evolución de la enfermedad, comorbilidades, prurito intenso y depresión. El costo promedio anual de la atención médica para dermatitis atópica moderada fue de 1527 ± 623 USD y para dermatitis atópica grave, de 9487± 8990 USD. Se obtuvieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en consultas de dermatología, interconsultas, estudios de laboratorio y gabinete y número de medicamentos prescritos. Con el análisis multivariado se identificó que el costo mayor lo presentaban los pacientes graves (p = 0.0001), más jóvenes, con comorbilidades y diagnóstico de depresión. Conclusiones: La gravedad de la dermatitis atópica, la edad, presentar comorbilidades y contar con el diagnóstico de depresión son las variables con mayor asociación e impacto en el costo directo de la atención médica.

A Community-based Assessment of Skin Care, Allergies, and Eczema (CASCADE): an atopic dermatitis primary prevention study using emollients-protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic skin disorder often beginning in infancy. Skin barrier dysfunction early in life serves as a central event in the pathogenesis of AD. In infants at high risk of developing AD, preventative application of lipid-rich emollients may reduce the risk of developing AD. This study aims to measure the effectiveness of this intervention in a population not selected for risk via a pragmatic, randomized, physician-blinded trial in the primary care setting. METHODS: Infant-parent dyads are recruited from a primary care practice participating through one of four practice-based research networks in Oregon, Colorado, Wisconsin, and North Carolina. Eligible dyads are randomized to the intervention (daily use of lipid-rich emollient) or the control (no emollient) group (n = 625 infants in each) and are followed for 24 months. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of physician-diagnosed AD and secondary outcomes include caregiver-reported measures of AD and development of other atopic diseases. Data collection occurs via chart review and surveys, with no study visits required. Data will be analyzed utilizing intention-to-treat principles. DISCUSSION: AD is a common skin condition in infants that affects quality of life and is associated with the development of other atopic diseases. If a safe intervention, such as application of lipid-rich emollients, in the general population effectively decreases AD prevalence, this could alter the guidance given by providers regarding routine skin care of infants. Because of the pragmatic design, we anticipate that this trial will yield generalizable results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03409367. Registered on 11 February 2018.

The burden of atopic dermatitis in adults in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) generates a considerable consumption of healthcare resources and significant economic consequences for the patients and their families, healthcare systems (NHS) and society. Several studies on the burden of AD in paediatric patients are available in literature, while data in adults is scant. The purpose of this study was to estimate the direct and indirect costs of moderate to severe AD in adult patients in Italy. METHODS: Patients with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score >20 were included in a multicentre, observational study conducted in six outpatient dermatology clinics throughout the national territory. Data were retrospectively gathered through a case report form investigating healthcare resources consumption, out-of-pocket expenses and patients' and caregivers' productivity loss. Descriptive statistics was used to illustrate data. Univariate generalized linear model with gamma distribution and identity function link was used to describe association between costs and disease severity. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe DA (EASI Score ≥20), equal to 89% of the total, were included in the analysis. The total annual burden of the disease, direct and indirect costs, amounted to € 4284 per patient; 19.3% accounted for direct medical costs, 19.9% for direct non-medical and 60.8% for indirect costs due to productivity loss. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-to-severe AD in adults represents an important cost for the society imposing a high financial burden for the NHS, but even more for patients and caregivers. Results from this study may support identification of potential factors impacting on the choice of new therapeutic options to improve the clinical and economic management of this devastating disease.