Feasibility of initiating robotic surgery during the early stages of gastrointestinal surgery education.

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal cancers is rapidly advancing; therefore, surgical education must be changed. This study aimed to examine the feasibility of early initiation of robotic surgery education for surgical residents. METHODS: The ability of staff physicians and residents to handle robotic surgical instruments was assessed using the da Vinci® skills simulator (DVSS). The short-term outcomes of 32 patients with colon cancer who underwent robot-assisted colectomy (RAC) by staff physicians and residents, supervised by a dual console system, between August 2022 and March 2024 were compared. RESULTS: The performances of four basic exercises were assessed after implementation of the DVSS. Residents required less time to complete these exercises and achieved a higher overall score than staff physicians. There were no significant differences in the short-term outcomes, operative time, blood loss, incidence of postoperative complications, and length of the postoperative hospital stay of the two surgeon groups. CONCLUSION: Based on the evaluation involving the DVSS and RAC results, it appears feasible to begin robotic surgery training at an early stage of surgical education using a dual console system.

Is reoperation required for patients presenting with hepatic portal venous gas after gastrointestinal surgery: a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hepatic portal venous gas(HPVG) represents a rare radiographic phenomenon frequently linked to intestinal necrosis, historically deemed to need immediate surgical intervention. The pivotal query arises about the imperative of urgent surgery when a patient manifests HPVG after gastrointestinal surgery. This inquiry seeks to elucidate whether emergent surgical measures remain a requisite in such cases. METHODS: The investigation into 14 cases of HPVG after gastrointestinal procedures was conducted through a comprehensive review of relevant literature. This methodological approach contributes to a nuanced understanding of HPVG occurrences following gastrointestinal surgery, informing clinical considerations and potential therapeutic strategies. RESULTS: Among the 14 patients, 12 recovered and 2 died. 6 patients underwent surgical exploration, 4 with negative findings and recovered. 8 cases received conservative treatment, resulting in improvement for 5, and 1 initially treated conservatively, revealed perforation during later surgical exploration, leading to improvement, 1 case ended in mortality. CONCLUSION: After gastrointestinal surgery, in Computed Tomography (CT) imaging, the coexistence of HPVG and gastrointestinal dilatation, without signs of peritoneal irritation on abdominal examination, may suggest HPVG due to acute gastrointestinal injury, intestinal gas, and displacement of gas-producing bacteria. These patients can be managed conservatively under close supervision. In cases where HPVG coexists with gastrointestinal dilatation and Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) without signs of peritoneal irritation, conservative treatment may be continued under close supervision. However, if progressive exacerbation occurs despite close monitoring and the aforementioned treatments, timely surgical exploration is deemed necessary. When HPVG is combined with signs of peritoneal irritation, prompt laparotomy and exploration are preferred.

SURGICAL SITE INFECTION IN RESECTIONS OF DIGESTIVE SYSTEM TUMOURS.

Postoperative infectious complications are extremely important to surgeons and the entire medical care team. Among these complications, surgical site infection (SSI) appears to be one of the earliest and most prevalent events and is considered an inherent complication of surgical procedures. In oncological patients submitted to resections of digestive system tumors, there is a confluence of several risk factors for SSI, making it necessary to establish measures to maximize the control of this condition to provide a better prognosis for these patients. Some risk factors for SSI are the manipulation of structures hosting the highest density of pathogenic microorganisms, such as the colon, the patient's performance status, the patient's nutritional status, the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and the surgical procedure itself, which tends to last longer and be more complex than surgeries for benign conditions of the digestive system. Therefore, this review sought to provide a qualitative analysis and a summary of the literature regarding the SSI of postoperative tumor patients who underwent surgical resection and were well-structured postoperatively, to provide objective data on this problem, and alert about the well-structured needs of individualized pre-, peri-, and post-protocols to avoid the development of these events.

Transabdominal levatorplasty technique in laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Rectal prolapse is characterized by a full-thickness intussusception of the rectal wall and is associated with a spectrum of coexisting anatomic abnormalities. We developed the transabdominal levatorplasty technique for laparoscopic rectopexy, inspired by Altemeier's procedure. In this method, following posterior mesorectum dissection, we expose the levator ani muscle just behind the anorectal junction. Horizontal sutures, using nonabsorbable material, are applied to close levator diastasis associated with rectal prolapse. The aim of the transabdominal levatorplasty is to (i) reinforce the pelvic floor, (ii) narrow the anorectal hiatus, and (iii) reconstruct the anorectal angle. We report a novel transabdominal levatorplasty technique during laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with levatorplasty technique was performed in eight cases: six underwent unilateral Orr-Loygue procedure, one modified Wells procedure, and one unilateral Orr-Loygue procedure combined with sacrocolpopexy for uterine prolapse. The median follow-up period was 178 (33-368) days, with no observed recurrences. Six out of seven patients with fecal incontinence experienced symptomatic improvement. Although the sample size is small and the follow-up period is short, this technique has the potential to reduce the recurrence rate and improve functional outcomes, as with levatorplasty of Altemeier's procedure. We believe that this technique may have the potential to become an option for rectal prolapse surgery.

The effects of remimazolam in combination with estazolam on postoperative hemodynamics and pain intensity in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of combining remimazolam with estazolam on hemodynamics and pain levels after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 184 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery were enrolled in this double-blind randomized controlled trial. The patients were divided into four groups: Study Group 1(Remimazolam), Study Group 2(Estazolam), Study Group 3(Remimazolam + Estazolam), and Control Group. Anesthesia induction included intravenous injection of remimazolam and estazolam in the study groups, while the control group received normal saline. Hemodynamic parameters, stress responses, anxiety levels, and pain intensity were assessed at various time points. RESULTS: The results showed that the combination of remimazolam and estazolam significantly improved hemodynamic parameters compared to the control group. Study Group 3 exhibited the lowest anxiety levels and stress responses among all groups. Furthermore, Study Group 3 had the lowest pain intensity scores at different postoperative time points. CONCLUSION: The combination of remimazolam and estazolam effectively stabilized hemodynamics, reduced anxiety levels, and alleviated pain intensity after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. These findings suggest that this combination therapy has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and patient comfort.

Enucleation for intestinal duplications: a comparative study with intestinal resection and anastomosis.

PURPOSE: Duplication enucleation (DE) has been described as an alternative to intestinal resection with primary anastomosis (IRA) for intestinal duplications, but no comparative study exists. The aim of this study was to compare both surgical procedures for intestinal duplication. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed, including all children treated for intestinal duplication (2005-2023). Patients that underwent DE were compared to those that underwent IRA. Statistical significance was determined using p < 0.05. Ethical approval was obtained. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (median age: 5 months) were treated for intestinal duplication, including 27 patients (53%) that underwent DE and 24 IRA (47%). A cystic image was detected prenatally in 19 patients (70%) with DE and 11 patients (46%) with IRA (p = 0.09). Enucleation was performed using laparoscopy in 7 patients (14%). Patients that underwent DE had shorter time to first feed (1 vs 3 days, p = 0.0001) and length of stay (4 vs 6 days, p < 0.0004) compared to IRA. A muscular layer was identified in 68% of intestinal resection specimens. CONCLUSION: Compared to intestinal resection with anastomosis, duplication enucleation is associated with decreased postoperative length of stay and delay to first feeds without increasing post-operative complications. Regarding histological analysis, enucleation seems feasible in most cases.

The use of postoperative calibrations in Hirschsprung disease: a practice to reconsider?

PURPOSE: Daily postoperative anal dilations after endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease (HD) are still considered a common practice. We analyzed the potential risks of this procedure and its effectiveness compared to a new internal protocol. METHODS: All infants (< 6 months of age) who underwent transanal endorectal pull-through between January 2021 and January 2023 were prospectively enrolled in a new postoperative protocol group without daily anal dilations (Group A) and compared (1:2 fashion) to those previously treated by postoperative anal dilations (Group B). Patients were matched for age and affected colonic tract. Patients with associated syndromes, extended total intestinal aganglionosis, and presence of enterostomy were excluded. Outcomes considered were: anastomotic complications (stenosis, disruption/leakage), incidence of enterocolitis, and constipation. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included in group A and compared to 22 matched patients (group B). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of anastomotic complications between the two groups. We found a lower incidence of enterocolitis and constipation among group A (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: A non-dilation strategy after endorectal pull-through could be a feasible alternative and does not significantly increase the risk of postoperative anastomotic complications. Moreover, some preliminary advantages such as lower enterocolitis rate and constipation should be further investigated.

Surgical maneuvers for long-segment Hirschsprung pull-through in unique patients.

PURPOSE: Patients with Hirschsprung disease affecting the splenic flexure or more proximal segments present a surgical challenge. Mobilizing the transverse colon to the pelvis during a pull-through may obstruct the distal ileum, or the length may be insufficient to reach the lower pelvis. This retrospective study aimed to describe two surgical techniques that facilitate mobilization of the transverse colon and their outcome. METHODS: We included patients operated on between April 2017 and April 2024 and analyzed sex, comorbidities, type of pull- through, age at pull-through, history of previous surgeries, cause of the proximal transverse colon pull-through, technique used (Deloyers or Turnbull), complications , postoperative outcome and follow-up. The first technique used was the maneuver described by Turnbull. This operation creates a mesenteric defect and mobilizes the colon into this mesenteric window at the distal ileum level. The second technique was described by Deloyers and involves a 180-degree rotation of the right colon by dissecting the right colon attachment and the hepatocolic ligament. The cecum and the ileocecal valve are placed in the right upper quadrant, and the distal colon is mobilized into the pelvis. RESULTS: We included 13 patients, 12 boys and 1 girl. Eight patients had previous surgeries in another hospital: five had an initial transverse colostomy, and three had an ileostomy. The remaining five had the initial operation in our hospital: two had an ileostomy, two had a colostomy, and one had a primary pull-through. The median age at pull-through was 16 months (4-59 months). We used the Turnbull technique in four patients whose aganglionosis was limited to the middle transverse colon. The Deloyers technique was used in the remaining patients, with ganglion cells in the proximal transverse colon. We left a protective ileostomy in five patients. The median follow-up was 4.5 years (3 months to 10 years). The stoma takedown is pending in one patient. CONCLUSION: The Turnbull and Deloyers techniques were helpful in patients with aganglionosis affecting the transverse colon.

[Comparison of early operative treatment and 48-hour conservative treatment in small bowel obstruction (COTACSO): intermediate results]. / Promezhutochnye rezul'taty otkrytogo prospektivnogo randomizirovannogo mnogotsentrovogo sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya rannei operatsii i 48-chasovogo neoperativnogo lecheniya spaechnoi kishechnoi neprokhodimosti.

Optimal treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) is not defined. Surgery is the only method of treatment for obvious strangulating SBO. Non-operative management (NOM) is widely used among patients with low risk of strangulation, i.e. no clinical, laboratory and CT signs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are recommended to determine the optimal method (early intervention or NOM), but their safety is unclear due to possible delay in surgery for patients needing early intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A RCT is devoted to outcomes of early operative treatment and NOM for adhesive SBO. The estimated trial capacity is 200 patients. Thirty-two patients were included in interim analysis. In 12 hours after admission, patients without apparent signs of strangulation were randomized into two clinical groups after conservative treatment. Group I included 12 patients who underwent immediate surgery, group II - 20 patients after 48-hour NOM. The primary endpoint was success of non-surgical regression of SBO and reduction in mortality. To evaluate patient safety, we analyzed mortality, complication rates and bowel resection in this RCT with previously published studies. RESULTS: In group I, all 12 (100%) patients underwent surgery. Only 4 (20%) patients required surgery in group II. Mortality, complication rates and bowel resection rates were similar in both groups. Strangulating SBO was found in 8 (25%) patients. Overall mortality was 6.3%, bowel resection rate - 6.3%, iatrogenic perforation occurred in 3 (18.8%) patients. These values did not exceed previous findings. CONCLUSION: Non-operative management within 48 hours prevented surgery in 80% of patients with SBO. Interim analysis found no significant between-group differences in mortality, complication rates and bowel resection rate. Patients had not been exposed to greater danger than other patients with adhesive SBO. The study is ongoing.

[Influence of diagnostic period on the outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease]. / Vliyanie dlitel'nosti diagnosticheskogo poiska na iskhod zabolevaniya pri bolezni Krona.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze archival data on emergency hospitalization of patients with Crohn's disease, indications for surgical treatment, structure of surgeries, localization of gastrointestinal lesions and relationship between diagnostic period and surgical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records of patients with Crohn's disease in 3 large hospitals was performed over the past 6 years. We estimated cases of surgical treatment, localization of gastrointestinal lesions, clinical and laboratory parameters of patients, period between clinical manifestation and diagnosis, as well as outcomes of disease depending on duration of diagnostic searching. CONCLUSION: Duration of diagnostic searching in patients with Crohn's disease is a significant predictor of complications and surgical treatment.

Efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal ropivacaine in pain management following laparoscopic digestive surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

BACKGROUND: Managing postoperative pain effectively with an opioid-free regimen following laparoscopic surgery (LS) remains a significant challenge. Intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine has been explored for its potential to reduce acute postoperative pain, but its efficacy and safety are still under debate. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine for acute pain management following laparoscopic digestive surgery. METHODS: We used PRISMA 2020 and a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 guidelines to conduct this review. The random-effects model was adopted using Review Manager Version 5.4 for pooled estimates. RESULTS: We retained 24 eligible RCTs involving 1705 patients (862 patients in the intraperitoneal instillation group and 843 patients in the control group). The intraperitoneal instillation group reduced total opioid consumption during the first 24 hours postoperatively (MD = -21.93 95% CI [-27.64, -16.23], P < .01), decreased pain scores at different time (4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours), shorter the hospital stay (MD = -0.20 95% CI [-0.36, -0.05], P < .01), reduced the postoperative shoulder pain (MD = 0.18 95% CI [0.07, 0.44], P < .01), and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting (MD = 0.47 95% CI [0.29, 0.77], P < .01). CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine appears to be an effective component of multimodal pain management strategies following laparoscopic digestive surgery, significantly reducing opioid consumption and improving postoperative recovery markers. Despite these promising results, additional high-quality trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach. REGISTRATION: The registration number at PROSPERO was CRD42021279238.

Methodological quality of research on perioperative immunomodulatory supplementation in oncological gastrointestinal tract surgery: a meta-research protocol.

INTRODUCTION: One of the topics that show differences of opinion in the scientific field of nutrition is the recommendation by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) of an immunomodulatory diet with arginine, nucleotides and omega-3 for individuals diagnosed with cancer undergoing major surgery. The quality of the recommendations is directly related to credibility, transparency and rigour in their development, but also to the quality of the studies published and available for inclusion in the recommendation, such as systematic reviews (SRs) and randomised clinical trials. The aim of this study is to evaluate the methodological quality of the recommendation of perioperative immunomodulatory supplementation for individuals with gastrointestinal and head and neck cancer, the CPGs, and the studies that support the recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic search for CPGs. Recommendations for nutritional supplementation with immunomodulatory substrates for individuals undergoing major oncological surgery will be analysed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence tool. CPGs will be analysed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II tool. The SRs cited in the recommendations will be analysed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews II tool and additional questions regarding heterogeneity in reviews. The clinical trials cited in the SRs and in the guideline recommendations (when applicable) will be analysed according to questions regarding heterogeneity in trials. The results will be presented in tables or charts using descriptive analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this study will be disseminated through relevant conferences and peer-reviewed journals. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X2GYT.

Leveraging Nursing Assessment for Early Identification of Post Operative Gastrointestinal Dysfunction (POGD) in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.

Background: Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) remains a common morbidity after gastrointestinal surgery. POGD is associated with delayed hospital recovery, increased length of stay, poor patient satisfaction and experience, and increased economic hardship. The I-FEED scoring system was created by a group of experts to address the lack of a consistent objective definition of POGD. However, the I-FEED tool needs clinical validation before it can be adopted into clinical practice. The scope of this phase 1 Quality Improvement initiative involves the feasibility of implementing percussion into the nursing workflow without additional burden. Methods: All gastrointestinal/colorectal surgical unit registered nurses underwent comprehensive training in abdominal percussion. This involved understanding the technique, its application in postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction assessment, and its integration into the existing nursing documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). After six months of education and practice, a six-question survey was sent to all inpatient GI surgical unit nurses about incorporating the percussion assessment into their routine workflow and documentation. Results: Responses were received from 91% of day-shift nurses and 76% of night-shift registered nurses. Overall, 95% of the nurses were confident in completing the abdominal percussion during their daily assessment. Conclusion: Nurses' effective use of the I-FEED tool may help improve patient outcomes after surgery. The tool could also be an effective instrument for the early identification of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) in surgical patients.

Impact of surgical specialization on emergency upper gastrointestinal surgery outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency presentations make up a large proportion of a general surgeon's workload. Patients who have emergency surgery carry a higher rate of mortality and complications. We aim to review the impact of surgical subspecialization on patients following upper gastrointestinal (UGI) emergency surgery. METHODS: A systematic search of Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases using a predefined search strategy was completed reviewing studies published from 1st of January 1990 to August 27, 2023. The study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359326). Studies were reviewed for the following outcomes: 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, conversion to open, length of stay, return to theater, and readmission. RESULTS: Of 5181 studies, 24 articles were selected for full text review. Of these, seven were eligible and included in this study. There was a statistically significant improvement in 30-day mortality favoring UGI specialists (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.55-0.92 and p = 0.009]) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.14-0.60 and p = 0009]). There was a high degree of study heterogeneity in 30-day mortality; however, a low degree of heterogeneity within in-hospital mortality. There was no statistical significance when considering conversion to open and insufficient data to allow meta-analysis for return to theater or readmission rates. CONCLUSION: In emergency UGI surgery, there was improved 30-day and in-hospital mortality for UGI specialists. Therefore, surgeons should consider early involvement of a subspecialist team to improve patient outcomes.

Low-calorie diets are effective for weight loss in patients undergoing benign upper gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obesity may increase surgical complexity in patients undergoing abdominal surgery by limiting visualization and increasing the risk of peri-operative complications. A preoperative reduction in weight and liver volume may improve surgical outcomes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of a low-calorie diet (LCD) versus a very low-calorie diet (VLCD) in reducing weight and liver volume prior to laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using the following inclusion criteria: obese patients undergoing preoperative weight loss using a VLCD or LCD, evaluation of liver volume reduction, and the use of an imaging modality before and after the diet. RESULTS: A total of 814 patients from 21 different studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, with 544 female patients (66.8%) and a mean age range between 24 and 54 years old. There was a total mean weight loss of 6.42% and mean liver volume reduction of 16.7%. Meta-analysis demonstrated that a preoperative diet (LCD or VLCD) significantly reduced weight [SMD = - 0.68; 95% CI (- 0.93, - 0.42), I2 = 82%, p ≤ 0.01] and liver volume [SMD = - 2.03; 95% CI (- 4.00, - 0.06), I2 = 94%, p ≤ 0.01]. When assessed individually, a VLCD led to significant weight reduction [SMD = - 0.79; CI (- 1.24; - 0.34), p ≤ 0.01, I2 = 90%], as did an LCD [SMD = - 0.60; CI (- 0.90; - 0.29), p ≤ 0.01, I2 = 68%). Similarly, there was a significant reduction in liver volume following a VLCD [SMD = - 1.40; CI (- 2.77, - 0.03), p ≤ 0.01, I2 = 96%], and an LCD [SMD = - 2.66; CI (- 6.13, 0.81), p ≤ 0.01, I2 = 93%]. However, there was no significant difference between the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative restrictive calorie diets are effective in reducing weight and liver volume prior to laparoscopic surgery. Whilst a VLCD was better than an LCD at reducing both weight and liver volume, the difference was not significant.

Comparison of outcomes in small bowel surgery for Crohn's disease: a retrospective NSQIP review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in medical therapy, approximately 33% of Crohn's disease (CD) patients will need surgery within 5 years after initial diagnosis. Several surgical approaches to CD have been proposed including small bowel resection, strictureplasty, and combined surgery with resection plus strictureplasty. Here, we utilize the American College of Surgeons (ACS) national surgical quality registry (NSQIP) to perform a comprehensive analysis of 30-day outcomes between these three surgical approaches for CD. METHODS: The authors queried the ACS-NSQIP database between 2015 and 2020 for all patients undergoing open or laparoscopic resection of small bowel or strictureplasty for CD using CPT and IC-CM 10. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, discharge disposition, wound complications, 30-day related readmission, and reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 2578 patients were identified; 87% of patients underwent small bowel resection, 5% resection with strictureplasty, and 8% strictureplasty alone. Resection plus strictureplasty (combined surgery) was associated with the longest operative time (p = 0.002). Patients undergoing small bowel resection had the longest length of hospital stay (p = 0.030) and the highest incidence of superficial/deep wound infection (44%, p = 0.003) as well as the highest incidence of sepsis (3.5%, p = 0.03). Small bowel resection was found to be associated with higher odds of wound complication compared to combined surgery (OR 2.09, p = 0.024) and strictureplasty (1.9, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that various surgical approaches for CD are associated with comparable outcomes in 30-day related reoperation and readmission, or disposition following surgery between all three surgical approaches. However, small bowel resection displayed higher odds of developing post-operative wound complications.

Comparing total mesorectal excision with partial mesorectal excision for proximal rectal cancer: evaluating postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes.

The treatment role of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) in proximal rectal cancers (PRC) is still debated. Partial Mesorectal Excision (PME) can reduce morbidity in PRC patients. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term clinical and long-term oncological outcomes between the two groups. A total of 157 PRC patients were enrolled in this study (114 performed with PME and 43 with TME). The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes. The overall postoperative complications rate was higher in TME group (18.4% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.05). The incidence of diverting ileostomy was also significantly higher in TME group (86.0% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001). Overall survival rates for 3, 5, and 7 years in PME and TME group accordingly were: 94.6%, 89.3%, 81.5% and 93.2%, 87.6%, 78.4% (p = 0.324). Disease-free survival rates for 3, 5, and 7 years in PME and TME group were: 90.2%, 84.5%, 78.6% and 88.7%, 81.2%, 75.3% (p = 0.297), respectively. Local recurrence rates for 3, 5, and 7 years in PME and TME group were: 2.6%, 6.1%, 8.8% and 4.6%, 9.3%, 11.2% (p = 0.061), respectively. PME is feasible and can be safely performed in PRC patients with favorable oncological outcomes. TME is associated with increasing risk of surgical complications and requires a two-step surgery for stoma takedown.