Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.670
Filter
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(29): e39016, 2024 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39029030

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common postoperative complication. However, information regarding rehabilitation strategies for postoperative dysphagia is limited. Herein, we report a compensatory strategy for treating dysphagia after ACDF. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 65-year-old Asian male presented with left arm pain and weakness for more than 1 month. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine revealed degenerative disc lesions and spinal stenosis at the C3 to C7 levels. The patient underwent ACDF at the C3 to C5 levels and artificial disc replacement at the C5 to C7 levels by right side approach. After surgery, the patient complained of difficulty swallowing. A video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) detected swallowing dysfunction in the pharyngeal phase, revealing an asymmetric pharyngeal residue in the anterior-posterior view. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with dysphagia after ACDF. INTERVENTIONS: Based on the VFSS findings, the patient underwent swallowing rehabilitation therapy and compensatory techniques, such as head rotation to the weak right side and head tilting to the robust left side. OUTCOMES: After 2 months of rehabilitation with compensatory techniques, food moved smoothly towards the robust side, and the subjective symptoms of dysphagia improved. LESSONS: Consequently, swallowing function post-ACDF surgery must be assessed; if unilateral dysphagia is detected, compensatory techniques may prove beneficial. This case study showed that, based on the objective findings of the VFSS, an effective swallowing compensation strategy can be established and applied to patients with postoperative dysphagia.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Deglutition Disorders , Diskectomy , Postoperative Complications , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Male , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/rehabilitation , Aged , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Spinal Stenosis/surgery
2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(14): 3982-3992, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39081148

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of single-level unilateral cervical radiculopathy (SLUCR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 81 patients with SLUCR in two hospitals from February 2020 to February 2022, including the MI-PCF group (n=40) and the ACDF group (n=41). The differences in neck and shoulder pain, visual analog score (VAS), upper limb radiating pain (VAS), and neck disability index (NDI) were compared. Operative time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and complications were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The degree of neck and shoulder pain relief at 1 day postoperatively was better in the ACDF group than in the MI-PCF group (p<0.05), while there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of neck and shoulder pain relief at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in the relief of upper limb radiating pain and the decrease of NDI scores between the two groups at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery (p>0.05). The patients in MI-PCF group had shorter operative time, less bleeding, and shorter hospital stay, which were statistically different (p<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the complication rate between the two groups, (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical efficacy and safety of MI-PCF and ACDF in the treatment of SLUCR are satisfactory, meanwhile, MI-PCF has shorter operative time, less bleeding and shorter hospital stay than ACDF, which is worthy of clinical promotion.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Diskectomy , Foraminotomy , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Radiculopathy , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Radiculopathy/surgery , Female , Male , Diskectomy/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Foraminotomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Pain Measurement
3.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 280, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960897

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) are both common surgical procedures in the management of pathologies of the subaxial cervical spine. While recent reviews have demonstrated ACCF to provide better decompression results compared to ACDF, the procedure has been associated with increased surgical risks. Nonetheless, the use of ACCF in a traumatic context has been poorly described. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of ACCF as compared to the more commonly performed ACDF. METHODS: All patients undergoing ACCF or ACDF for subaxial cervical spine injuries spanning over 2 disc-spaces and 3 vertebral-levels, between 2006 and 2018, at the study center, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were matched based on age and preoperative ASIA score. RESULTS: After matching, 60 patients were included in the matched analysis, where 30 underwent ACDF and ACCF, respectively. Vertebral body injury was significantly more common in the ACCF group (p = 0.002), while traumatic disc rupture was more frequent in the ACDF group (p = 0.032). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of surgical complications, including implant failure, wound infection, dysphagia, CSF leakage between the groups (p ≥ 0.05). The rates of revision surgeries (p > 0.999), mortality (p = 0.222), and long-term ASIA scores (p = 0.081) were also similar. CONCLUSION: Results of both unmatched and matched analyses indicate that ACCF has comparable outcomes and no additional risks compared to ACDF. It is thus a safe approach and should be considered for patients with extensive anterior column injury.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Diskectomy , Postoperative Complications , Spinal Fusion , Spinal Injuries , Humans , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Diskectomy/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Adult , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Spinal Injuries/surgery , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 390, 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Poor neurological recovery in patients after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has been frequently reported; however, no study has analyzed the preoperative imaging characteristics of patients to investigate the factors affecting surgical prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that affect the preoperative imaging characteristics of patients and their influence on poor neurologic recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 89 patients who met the criteria for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy and evaluated the patients' neurological recovery based on the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores at the time of the final follow-up visit. Patients were categorized into the "good" and "poor" groups based on the JOA recovery rates of ≥ 50% and < 50%, respectively. Clinical information (age, gender, body mass index, duration of symptoms, preoperative JOA score, and JOA score at the final follow-up) and imaging characteristics (cervical kyphosis, cervical instability, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), calcification of herniated intervertebral discs, increased signal intensity (ISI) of the spinal cord on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and degree of degeneration of the discs adjacent to the fused levels (cranial and caudal) were collected from the patients. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for poor neurologic recovery. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 52.56 ± 11.18 years, and the mean follow-up was 26.89 ± 11.14 months. Twenty patients (22.5%) had poor neurological recovery. Univariate analysis showed that significant predictors of poor neurological recovery were age (p = 0.019), concomitant OPLL (p = 0.019), concomitant calcification of herniated intervertebral discs (p = 0.019), ISI of the spinal cord on T2WI (p <0.05), a high grade of degeneration of the discs of the cranial neighboring levels (p <0.05), and a high grade of discs of the caudal neighboring levels (p <0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that ISI of the spinal cord on T2WI (p = 0.001 OR = 24.947) and high degree of degeneration of adjacent discs on the cranial side (p = 0.040 OR = 6.260) were independent risk factors for poor neurological prognosis. CONCLUSION: ISI of the spinal cord on T2WI and high degree of cranial adjacent disc degeneration are independent risk factors for poor neurological recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. A comprehensive analysis of the patients' preoperative imaging characteristics can help in the development of surgical protocols and the management of patients' surgical expectations.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Diskectomy , Recovery of Function , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Diskectomy/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Aged , Adult , Spondylosis/surgery , Spondylosis/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 166(1): 284, 2024 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976059

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Post-operative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is often treated using thoracic epidural analgesics or thoracic paravertebral analgesics. This article describes a case where a thoracic disc herniation is treated with a thoracoscopic microdiscectomy with post-operative thoracic epidural analgesics. The patient developed a bupivacaine pleural effusion which mimicked a hemothorax on computed tomography (CT). METHODS: The presence of bupivacaine in the pleural effusion was confirmed using a high performance liquid chromatography method. RESULTS: The patient underwent a re-exploration to relieve the pleural effusion. The patient showed a long-term recovery similar to what can be expected from an uncomplicated thoracoscopic microdiscectomy. CONCLUSION: A pleural effusion may occur when thoracic epidural analgesics are used in patents with a corridor between the pleural cavity and epidural space.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Epidural , Bupivacaine , Diskectomy , Hemothorax , Intervertebral Disc Displacement , Pleural Effusion , Humans , Anesthesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Epidural/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/methods , Bupivacaine/adverse effects , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Pleural Effusion/diagnostic imaging , Pleural Effusion/surgery , Hemothorax/etiology , Hemothorax/surgery , Hemothorax/chemically induced , Hemothorax/diagnosis , Hemothorax/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/methods , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/adverse effects , Diagnosis, Differential , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Female
6.
Adv Gerontol ; 37(1-2): 50-59, 2024.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944773

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was a comparative analysis the effectiveness of microsurgical discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of disk herniation adjacent to the anomaly of the lumbosacral junction segment in elderly patients. The study included 80 elderly patients (over 60 years old), divided into two groups: the 1st-(n=39) who underwent microsurgical discectomy; the 2nd- patients (n=41) operated on using minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion and percutaneous transpedicular stabilization (MI-TLIF). For the comparative analysis, we used gender characteristics (gender, age), constitutional characteristics (BMI), degree of physical status according to ASA, intraoperative parameters of interventions and the specificity of postoperative patient management, clinical data, and the presence of complications. Long-term outcomes were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 3 years. As a result, it was found that the use of MI-TLIF allows achieving better long-term clinical outcomes, fewer major complications in comparison with the microsurgical discectomy technique in the treatment of disc herniation adjacent to the anomaly of the lumbosacral junction segment in elderly patients.


Subject(s)
Diskectomy , Intervertebral Disc Displacement , Lumbar Vertebrae , Microsurgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Male , Female , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/diagnosis , Diskectomy/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Aged , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Microsurgery/methods , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis
7.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(25): e37908, 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38905436

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin supplementation may have some potential in pain control after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of gabapentin supplementation on postoperative pain management for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of gabapentin supplementation on the pain control of lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention for lumbar laminectomy and discectomy, gabapentin supplementation was associated with significantly lower pain scores at 2 hours (MD = -2.75; 95% CI = -3.09 to -2.41; P < .00001), pain scores at 4 hours (MD = -2.28; 95% CI = -3.36 to -1.20; P < .0001), pain scores at 24 hours (MD = -0.70; 95% CI = -0.86 to -0.55; P < .00001) and anxiety score compared to control intervention (MD = -1.32; 95% CI = -1.53 to -1.11; P < .00001), but showed no obvious impact on pain scores at 12 hours (MD = -0.58; 95% CI = -1.39 to 0.22; P = .16). In addition, gabapentin supplementation could significantly decrease the incidence of vomiting in relative to control intervention (OR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.12-0.81; P = .02), but they had similar incidence of nausea (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.15-1.73; P = .28). CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin supplementation benefits to pain control after lumbar laminectomy and discectomy.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Diskectomy , Gabapentin , Laminectomy , Lumbar Vertebrae , Pain, Postoperative , Gabapentin/therapeutic use , Gabapentin/administration & dosage , Humans , Laminectomy/adverse effects , Laminectomy/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/methods , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Amines/therapeutic use , Amines/administration & dosage , Pain Measurement , Pain Management/methods
8.
Int Orthop ; 48(8): 2243-2250, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777971

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy of mini-open (air/water medium) endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (MOEA-ACDF) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed the clinical data of CSM patients who received surgical treatment from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method: the MOEA-ACDF group and the ACDF group. The preoperative and postoperative imaging results at one week and the last follow-up examination were compared between the two groups. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and neck disability index (NDI) score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes preoperatively, one week postoperatively and at the last follow-up examination. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 131 CSM patients who underwent surgery at our institution were included, including 61 patients in the MOEA-ACDF group and 70 patients in the ACDF group. In the MOEA-ACDF group, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and HAVB were significantly greater than the preoperative values (P < 0.05). In the ACDF group, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle was also significantly greater than the preoperative value, and the C2-C7 ROM and HAVB significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The postoperative neurological function of the patients in both groups improved, and the postoperative VAS score and NDI score significantly decreased. Compared with ACDF, MOEA-ACDF is associated with a significantly larger postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and significantly better C2-C7 ROM and HAVB, as well as better clinical efficacy (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MOEA-ACDF combines endoscopic systems with ACDF technology to treat CSM, but its clinical efficacy is not inferior to that of ACDF in the short- to intermediate-term. It can effectively and safely restore the cervical intervertebral height, physiological curvature, and range of motion.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Diskectomy , Endoscopy , Spinal Fusion , Spondylosis , Humans , Male , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Female , Middle Aged , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Diskectomy/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Spondylosis/surgery , Spondylosis/diagnostic imaging , Endoscopy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Adult , Spinal Cord Diseases/surgery , Spinal Cord Diseases/diagnostic imaging
9.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 369, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730401

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One goal of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is to restore the loss of intervertebral disc height (IDH) results from the degenerative process. However, the effects of IDH on postoperative dysphagia after ACDF remain unclear. METHODS: Based on the results of a one-year telephone follow-up, A total of 217 consecutive patients after single-level ACDF were enrolled. They were divided into dysphagia and non-dysphagia groups. The age, BMI, operation time and blood loss of all patients were collected from the medical record system and compared between patients with and without dysphagia. Radiologically, IDH, spinous process distance (SP) of the operated segment, and C2-7 angle (C2-7 A) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. The relationship between changes in these radiological parameters and the development of dysphagia was analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-three (29%) cases exhibited postoperative dysphagia. The mean changes in IDH, SP, and C2-7 A were 2.84 mm, -1.54 mm, and 4.82 degrees, respectively. Changes in IDH (P = 0.001) and changes in C2-7 A (P = 0.000) showed significant differences between dysphagia and non-dysphagia patients. Increased IDH and increased C2-7 A (P = 0.037 and 0.003, respectively) significantly and independently influenced the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. When the change in IDH was ≥ 3 mm, the chance of developing postoperative dysphagia for this patient was significantly greater. No significant relationship was observed between the change in spinous process distance (SP) and the incidence of dysphagia. The age, BMI, operation time and blood loss did not significantly influence the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. CONCLUSION: The change in IDH could be regarded as a predictive factor for postoperative dysphagia after single-level ACDF.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Deglutition Disorders , Diskectomy , Intervertebral Disc , Postoperative Complications , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Intervertebral Disc/surgery , Intervertebral Disc/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies
10.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 401, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The frequency of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has increased up to 400% since 2011, underscoring the need to preoperatively anticipate adverse postoperative outcomes given the procedure's expanding use. Our study aims to accomplish two goals: firstly, to develop a suite of explainable machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting adverse postoperative outcomes following ACDF surgery, and secondly, to embed these models in a user-friendly web application, demonstrating their potential utility. METHODS: We utilized data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who underwent ACDF surgery. The outcomes of interest were four short-term postoperative adverse outcomes: prolonged length of stay (LOS), non-home discharges, 30-day readmissions, and major complications. We utilized five ML algorithms - TabPFN, TabNET, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest - coupled with the Optuna optimization library for hyperparameter tuning. To bolster the interpretability of our models, we employed SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for evaluating predictor variables' relative importance and used partial dependence plots to illustrate the impact of individual variables on the predictions generated by our top-performing models. We visualized model performance using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and precision-recall curves (PRC). Quantitative metrics calculated were the area under the ROC curve (AUROC), balanced accuracy, weighted area under the PRC (AUPRC), weighted precision, and weighted recall. Models with the highest AUROC values were selected for inclusion in a web application. RESULTS: The analysis included 57,760 patients for prolonged LOS [11.1% with prolonged LOS], 57,780 for non-home discharges [3.3% non-home discharges], 57,790 for 30-day readmissions [2.9% readmitted], and 57,800 for major complications [1.4% with major complications]. The top-performing models, which were the ones built with the Random Forest algorithm, yielded mean AUROCs of 0.776, 0.846, 0.775, and 0.747 for predicting prolonged LOS, non-home discharges, readmissions, and complications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study employs advanced ML methodologies to enhance the prediction of adverse postoperative outcomes following ACDF. We designed an accessible web application to integrate these models into clinical practice. Our findings affirm that ML tools serve as vital supplements in risk stratification, facilitating the prediction of diverse outcomes and enhancing patient counseling for ACDF.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Diskectomy , Internet , Machine Learning , Postoperative Complications , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Diskectomy/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Female , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Databases, Factual
11.
World Neurosurg ; 187: e714-e721, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692566

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute upper airway compromise is a rare but catastrophic complication after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. This study aims to develop a score to identify patients at risk of acute postoperative airway compromise (PAC). METHODS: Potential risk factors for acute PAC were selected by a modified Delphi process. Ten patients with acute PAC were identified of 1466 patients who underwent elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion between July 2014 and May 2019. A comparison group was created by a randomized selection process (non-PAC group). Factors associated with PAC and a P value of < 0.10 were entered into a logistic regression model and coefficients contributed to each risk factor's overall score. Calibration of the model was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Quantitative discrimination was calculated, and the final model was internally validated with bootstrap sampling. RESULTS: We identified 18 potential risk factors from our Delphi process, of which 6 factors demonstrated a significant association with airway compromise: age >65 years, current smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2, history of a bleeding disorder, surgery of upper subaxial cervical spine (above C4), and duration of surgery >179 minutes. The final prediction model included 5 predictors with very strong performance characteristics. These 5 factors formed the PAC score, with a range from 0 to 100. A score of 20 yielded the greatest balance of sensitivity (80%) and specificity (88%). CONCLUSIONS: The acute PAC score demonstrates strong performance characteristics. The PAC score might help identify patients at risk of upper airway compromise caused by surgical site abnormalities.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Diskectomy , Postoperative Complications , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Aged , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Adult , Delphi Technique , Airway Obstruction/etiology
12.
World Neurosurg ; 188: e18-e24, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631663

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Dural tears (DTs) are a frequent complication after lumbar spine surgery. We sought to determine the incidence of DTs and the related impact on health care expenditures after lumbar discectomies. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients with first-time single-level lumbar discectomies at our institution who underwent minimally invasive surgery from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed. Age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, costs, revenues, length of stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and operative time (OT) were assessed. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, previous spine surgery, multiple or traumatic disc herniations, and malignant and infectious diseases. RESULTS: The follow-up time was at least 12 months postoperatively. Of 358 patients identified with lumbar discectomies, 230 met the inclusion criteria. Incidence of DTs was 3.5%. Mean costs (P < 0.001), economic loss (P < 0.01), and OT (P < 0.0001) were found to be significantly higher in the DT group compared with the control group of patients without a DT. The revenues were not statistically different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Further analysis of the control group by profit and loss revealed significantly higher body mass index (P < 0.05), length of stay (P < 0.0001), and OT (P < 0.0001) in the loss group. CONCLUSIONS: DTs represent a significant socioeconomic burden in lumbar spine surgery and cause severe secondary complications. The impact of DTs on health care expenses is primarily based on significantly higher OT and a higher mean length of stay.


Subject(s)
Diskectomy , Dura Mater , Lumbar Vertebrae , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy/economics , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Adult , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Dura Mater/injuries , Dura Mater/surgery , Aged , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/economics , Microsurgery/economics , Incidence
13.
World Neurosurg ; 187: e174-e180, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636629

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Smoking tobacco cigarettes negatively impacts bone healing after spinal fusion. Smoking history is often assessed based on current smoker and nonsmoker status. However, in current research, smoking history has not been quantified in terms of pack years to estimate lifetime exposure and assess its effects. Our goal was to investigate the influence of smoking history, quantified in pack years, on bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent ACDF for cervical disc degeneration between September 21, 2017 and October 17, 2018 was conducted. Patient demographics, procedural variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for bony fusion following ACDF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal discrimination threshold for smoking history pack years in association with nonfusion. RESULTS: Among 97 patients identified, 90 (93%) demonstrated bony fusion on postoperative imaging. Mean number of smoking history pack years was 6.1 ± 13 for the fusion group and 16 ± 21 for the nonfusion group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that increased pack years of tobacco cigarette smoking was a significant predictor of nonfusion (95% confidence interval, [1.0,1.1], P = 0.045). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that 6.1 pack years best stratified the risk for nonfusion (area under the curve, 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of tobacco cigarette smoking ≥6.1 pack years may have an increased risk of nonfusion after ACDF.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Cigarette Smoking , Diskectomy , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Male , Female , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Cigarette Smoking/epidemiology , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/epidemiology , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged
14.
Eur Spine J ; 33(6): 2179-2189, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647605

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Tubular microdiskectomy (tMD) is one of the most commonly used for treating lumbar disk herniation. However, there still patients still complain of persistent postoperative residual low back pain (rLBP) postoperatively. This study attempts to develop a nomogram to predict the risk of rLBP after tMD. METHODS: The patients were divided into non-rLBP (LBP VAS score < 2) and rLBP (LBP VAS score ≥ 2) group. The correlation between rLBP and these factors were analyzed by multivariate logistic analysis. Then, a nomogram prediction model of rLBP was developed based on the risk factors screened by multivariate analysis. The samples in the model are randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the diskrimination, calibration and clinical value of the model, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 14.3% (47/329) of patients have persistent rLBP. The multivariate analysis suggests that higher preoperative LBP visual analog scale (VAS) score, lower facet orientation (FO), grade 2-3 facet joint degeneration (FJD) and moderate-severe multifidus fat atrophy (MFA) are risk factors for postoperative rLBP. In the training and validation sets, the ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCAs suggested the good diskrimination, predictive accuracy between the predicted probability and actual probability, and clinical value of the model, respectively. CONCLUSION: This nomogram including preoperative LBP VAS score, FO, FJD and MFA can serve a promising prediction model, which will provide a reference for clinicians to predict the rLBP after tMD.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Displacement , Low Back Pain , Lumbar Vertebrae , Nomograms , Humans , Low Back Pain/etiology , Low Back Pain/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Adult , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Aged
15.
Eur Spine J ; 33(6): 2332-2339, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664273

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic subaxial fractures account for more than half of all cervical spine injuries. The optimal surgical approach is a matter of debate and may include anterior, posterior or a combined anteroposterior (360º) approach. Analyzing a cohort of patients initially treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for traumatic subaxial injuries, the study aimed to identify predictors for treatment failure and the subsequent need for supplementary posterior fusion (PF). METHODS: A retrospective, single center, consecutive cohort study of all adult patients undergoing primary ACDF for traumatic subaxial cervical spine fractures between 2006 and 2018 was undertaken and 341 patients were included. Baseline clinical and radiological data for all included patients were analyzed and 11 cases of supplementary posterior fixation were identified. RESULTS: Patients were operated at a median of 2.0 days from the trauma, undergoing 1-level (78%), 2-levels (16%) and ≥ 3-levels (6.2%) ACDF. A delayed supplementary PF was performed in 11 cases, due to ACDF failure. On univariable regression analysis, older age (p = 0.017), shorter stature (p = 0.031), posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) injury (p = 0.004), injury to ligamentum flavum (p = 0.005), bilateral facet joint dislocation (p < 0.001) and traumatic cervical spondylolisthesis (p = 0.003) predicted ACDF failure. On the multivariable regression model, older age (p = 0.015), PLL injury (p = 0.048), and bilateral facet joint dislocation (p = 0.010) remained as independent predictors of ACDF failure. CONCLUSIONS: ACDF is safe and effective for the treatment of subaxial cervical spine fractures. High age, bilateral facet joint dislocation and traumatic PLL disruption are independent predictors of failure. We suggest increased vigilance regarding these cases.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Diskectomy , Spinal Fractures , Spinal Fusion , Treatment Failure , Humans , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Diskectomy/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Male , Female , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Middle Aged , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Aged
16.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) ; 64(5): 205-213, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569916

ABSTRACT

Airway complications that occur after anterior cervical spine surgery pose a life-threatening risk, which encompasses complications including prolonged intubation, unplanned reintubation, and/or necessity of tracheostomy. The present study aimed to identify the surgical risks associated with postoperative airway complications in neurosurgical training institutes. A retrospective, multicenter, observational review of data from 365 patients, who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery between 2018 and 2022, at three such institutes was carried out. Postoperative airway complication was defined as either the need for prolonged intubation on the day of surgery or the need for unplanned reintubation. The perioperative medical information was obtained from their medical records. The average age of the cohort was over 60 years, with males comprising approximately 70%. Almost all surgeries predominantly involved anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion, with most surgeries occurring at the level of C5/6. In total, 363 of 365 patients (99.5%) were extubated immediately after surgery, and the remaining two patients were kept under intubation because of the risk of airway complications. Of the 363 patients who underwent extubation immediately after surgery, two (0.55%) required reintubation because of postoperative airway complications. Patients who experienced airway complications were notably older and exhibited a significantly lower body mass index. The results of this study suggested that older and frailer individuals are at an elevated risk for postoperative airway complications, with immediate postoperative extubation generally being safe but requiring careful judgment in specific cases.


Subject(s)
Airway Management , Cervical Vertebrae , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Female , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Aged , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Adult , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over
17.
Eur Spine J ; 33(7): 2886-2891, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687394

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Incidental dural tears are common complications in lumbar spine surgery, particularly in endoscopic procedures where primary closure via suturing is challenging. The absence of a standardized approach for dural closure in endoscopic spine surgery necessitates exploring alternative techniques. OBJECTIVE: This study introduces a surgical technique for dural closure utilizing fat graft and Gelfoam, offering an effective alternative to standard approaches in endoscopic spine surgery. METHODS: Surgical data from patients who underwent interlaminar endoscopic discectomy or stenosis decompression at Lerdsin Hospital from October 2014 to October 2021 were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 393 cases, dural tears occurred in 2% (8 patients). Our technique achieved successful closure in all these cases, with no incidents of cerebrospinal fluid leakage or wound complications. The majority of patients showed favorable clinical outcomes, except for one case involving concomitant nerve root injury. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that using fat graft and Gelfoam for dural closure is a simple, reliable, and safe technique, particularly effective for challenging-to-repair areas in interlaminar endoscopic lumbar spine surgery.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue , Dura Mater , Gelatin Sponge, Absorbable , Lumbar Vertebrae , Humans , Middle Aged , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Dura Mater/surgery , Dura Mater/injuries , Female , Male , Gelatin Sponge, Absorbable/therapeutic use , Aged , Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Adipose Tissue/surgery , Adult , Endoscopy/methods , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Diskectomy/methods , Diskectomy/adverse effects
18.
Spine J ; 24(8): 1459-1466, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570035

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar discectomy is a commonly performed surgery following which surgical site infection (SSI) may occur. Prior literature has suggested that, following SSI related to lumbar fusion, the rate of subsequent lumbar surgeries is increased over prolonged periods of time. This has not been studied specifically for lumbar discectomy. PURPOSE: To define factors associated with SSI following lumbar discectomy and determine if subsequently matched cohorts with and without SSI have differential rates of subsequent lumbar surgery beyond irrigation and debridement (I&Ds) over time. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing isolated primary lumbar laminotomy/discectomy were identified from the 2010-2021 M157 PearlDiver database. Exclusion criteria included: age<18 years, preoperative diagnosis of infection, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses within 90 days prior to index surgery, additional spinal surgeries on the same day as lumbar discectomy, and not being active in the database for at least 90 days postoperative. From this study population, those who developed SSI were identified based on undergoing I&D within 90 days after surgery. Those with versus without SSI were then matched 1:4 based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), and obesity. OUTCOME MEASURES: Following initial I&D, incidence of revision lumbar surgery (revision lumbar discectomy, lumbar laminectomy, lumbar fusion) out to 5 years after lumbar discectomy. METHODS: Following index isolated lumbar discectomy, those with versus without SSI requiring I&D were matched and compared for incidence of secondary surgery in defined time intervals (0-6 months, 6-12 months, 1-2 years, 2-5 years) using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for patient age, sex, ECI, and obesity status. RESULTS: Of 323,025 isolated lumbar discectomy patients, SSI requiring I&D was identified for 583 (0.18%). Multivariable analysis revealed several independent predictors of these SSIs: younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.85 per decade increase), ECI (OR 1.22 per 2-point increase), and obesity (OR 1.30). Following matching of those with versus without SSI requiring I&D, rates of subsequent surgery beyond I&D were compared. Those with SSI had significantly increased odds of lumbar revision in the first six months (OR 5.26, p<.001), but not 6-12 months (p=.462), 1-2 years (p=.515), or 2-5 years (p=.677). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, SSI requiring I&D is a rare postoperative complication following lumbar discectomy. If occurring, subsequent surgery beyond I&D was higher in the first 6 months, but then not increased at subsequent time points out to five years.


Subject(s)
Diskectomy , Lumbar Vertebrae , Reoperation , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Laminectomy/adverse effects , Risk Factors
19.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 322, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654321

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of full endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (FETD) on clinical outcomes and complications in both obese and non-obese patients presenting with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: A systematic search of relevant literature was conducted across various primary databases until November 18, 2023. Operative time and hospitalization were evaluated. Clinical outcomes included preoperative and postoperative assessments of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, conducted to delineate improvements at 3 months postoperatively and during the final follow-up, respectively. Complications were also documented. RESULTS: Four retrospective studies meeting inclusion criteria provided a collective cohort of 258 patients. Obese patients undergoing FETD experienced significantly longer operative times compared to non-obese counterparts (P = 0.0003). Conversely, no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in hospitalization duration, improvement of VAS for back and leg pain scores at 3 months postoperatively and final follow-up, improvement of ODI at 3 months postoperatively and final follow-up. Furthermore, the overall rate of postoperative complications was higher in the obese group (P = 0.02). The obese group demonstrated a total incidence of complications of 17.17%, notably higher than the lower rate of 9.43% observed in the non-obese group. CONCLUSION: The utilization of FETD for managing LDH in individuals with obesity is associated with prolonged operative times and a higher total complication rate compared to their non-obese counterparts. Nevertheless, it remains a safe and effective surgical intervention for treating herniated lumbar discs in the context of obesity.


Subject(s)
Diskectomy , Endoscopy , Intervertebral Disc Displacement , Lumbar Vertebrae , Obesity , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Obesity/surgery , Obesity/complications , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Endoscopy/methods , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Operative Time , Pain Measurement , Disability Evaluation , Retrospective Studies
20.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 245, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627743

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the predictive value of a newly developed MRI-based Endplate Bone Quality (EBQ) in relation to the development of cage subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: Patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical diseases between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Correlation between EBQ scores and segmental height loss was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. ROC analyses were employed to ascertain the EBQ cut-off values that predict the occurrence of cage subsidence. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors associated with postoperative cage subsidence. RESULTS: 23 individuals (14.56%) exhibited the cage subsidence after ACDF. In the nonsubsidence group, the average EBQ and lowest T-score were determined to be 4.13 ± 1.14 and - 0.84 ± 1.38 g/cm2 respectively. In contrast, the subsidence group exhibited a mean EBQ and lowest T-score of 5.38 ± 0.47 (p < 0.001) and - 1.62 ± 1.34 g/cm2 (p = 0.014), respectively. There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.798**) between EBQ and the segmental height loss. The EBQ threshold of 4.70 yielded optimal sensitivity (73.9%) and specificity (93.3%) with AUC of 0.806. Furthermore, the lowest T-score (p = 0.045, OR 0.667) and an elevated cervical EBQ score (p < 0.001, OR 8.385) were identified as significant risk factors for cage subsidence after ACDF. CONCLUSIONS: The EBQ method presents itself as a promising and efficient tool for surgeons to assess patients at risk of cage subsidence and osteoporosis prior to cervical spine surgery, utilizing readily accessible patient data.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neck/surgery , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/methods , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL