Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.303
Filter
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(8)2024 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39202488

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a single preoperative dose of deflazacort on pain, swelling, and trismus after impacted lower third molar surgery. Materials and Methods: This randomised, prospective, double-blind, split-mouth clinical study included 26 healthy individuals with bilaterally impacted lower third molars. Group 1 was given a placebo (single-dose vitamin C tablet), and group 2 was given a single 30 mg dose of deflazacort 1 h prior to surgery. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale for 1 week postoperatively. Oedema (in mm) and trismus (in mm) were evaluated preoperatively and on postoperative days 2 and 7. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied for group analyses. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the deflazacort group at the 6th and 12th hours after surgery (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in trismus between the groups at any time point (p > 0.05). There was less oedema in the deflazacort group on postoperative days 2 and 7, without any statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A single preoperative dose of 30 mg deflazacort was found to be clinically effective in reducing pain and oedema after extraction of impacted lower third molars.


Subject(s)
Edema , Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Pregnenediones , Tooth, Impacted , Trismus , Humans , Trismus/prevention & control , Trismus/etiology , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Female , Male , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/etiology , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Prospective Studies , Pregnenediones/therapeutic use , Pregnenediones/administration & dosage , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction/methods , Young Adult , Pain Measurement/methods
2.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 1018, 2024 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39215323

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limiting postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection is crucial for smooth healing. This prospective, controlled clinical trial investigated and compared the effectiveness of dexamethasone and hyaluronidase in relieving these complications. METHODS: In groups Ia and IIa, 8 mg of dexamethasone and 150 IU of hyaluronidase were administered following the removal of impacted teeth, respectively. The contralateral sides (groups Ib and IIb) were determined as control groups. Edema, pain, trismus, and infection were clinically evaluated on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days. RESULTS: 60 patients were enrolled in the study. Hyaluronidase provided significantly more edema relief than dexamethasone on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days (P = 0.031, 0.002, 0.000, and 0.009, respectively). No statistical difference was found between dexamethasone and hyaluronidase in VAS and rescue analgesic intake amount values for all time points. Hyaluronidase was more effective in reducing trismus than dexamethasone on the 2nd and 3rd postoperative days (P = 0.029, 0.024, respectively). Neither of the agents significantly increased the postoperative infection rate. CONCLUSIONS: Hyaluronidase can be selected when postoperative excessive edema and trismus are anticipated. Dexamethasone may be a cost-effective option if postoperative pain control is merely targeted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Protocol Registration and Results System (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT05466604) on 20/07/2022.


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone , Edema , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase , Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Tooth, Impacted , Trismus , Humans , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/therapeutic use , Trismus/prevention & control , Edema/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Adult , Young Adult , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pain Measurement , Adolescent , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 301: 240-245, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39167877

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal delivery has several benefits for the parturient; however, during labor, some injuries, such as lacerations and/or episiotomy, can occur. Perineal pain may occur in the puerperium and can be aggravated in cases of perineal injury during childbirth, potentially impacting the physical and emotional aspects of the parturient. For this reason, it is necessary to use techniques that can relieve pain and edema in the immediate postpartum period, directly influencing recovery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the reduction of pain and improvement in healing using two techniques, namely photobiomodulation and cryotherapy, performed in the immediate postpartum period of up to 12 h, in parturients who suffered grade I and II lacerations and/or episiotomy. METHODS: Data collection was carried out through an evaluation questionnaire. Photobiomodulation was applied using the red and infrared laser from the DMC brand. The EVA and McGill scales were used for pain assessment, and the REEDA scale was used for the evaluation of edema and healing. RESULTS: The techniques were evaluated and applied to 56 patients, with 28 in each group (cryotherapy and LBI). Patients who received photobiomodulation showed superior improvement compared to cryotherapy. In the immediate postpartum period, there was a greater reduction in pain in favor of photobiomodulation (p = 0.008); and after 24 h, the difference was even more significant (p < 0.001).


Subject(s)
Cryotherapy , Edema , Episiotomy , Lacerations , Low-Level Light Therapy , Perineum , Postpartum Period , Humans , Female , Cryotherapy/methods , Perineum/injuries , Episiotomy/adverse effects , Adult , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/therapy , Edema/etiology , Pregnancy , Lacerations/therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Vulvar Diseases/therapy , Vulva , Young Adult , Pain Measurement , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects
6.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 706, 2024 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38890655

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical extraction of impacted third molars (ITM) often leads to postoperative discomfort including pain, swelling, and limited function. Steroids like dexamethasone (DXN) are commonly used in oral surgery to manage pain and inflammation. Various administration routes for DXN exist, including intravenous (IV), perineural (PN), and oral applications, each with its advantages. Previous studies have shown that adding DXN to local anesthetics can prolong anesthesia duration and reduce postoperative sequelae. However, comparative studies on IV and PN applications with inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) of DXN in ITM surgeries are limited. METHODS: This controlled, randomized observational study involved patients undergoing Class II position B ITM extraction. Patients were divided into three groups. IANB (1.8 ml of articaine hydrochloride + 1 ml of saline) was performed 1 h after IV-DXN (4 mg/ml DXN) was administered to the IV group. DXN along with IANB (1.8 ml of articaine hydrochloride + 1 ml of 4 mg/ml DXN) was applied to the PN group. Only IANB (1.8 ml of articaine hydrochloride + 1 ml of saline) was applied to the control group. Anesthesia duration was assessed as primary outcomes. Anesthesia duration was evaluated using a vitalometer from the molars. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain and edema measured on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days after surgery. Pain was evaluated postoperatively by using a visual analog scale. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study included 45 patients with similar demographic characteristics across groups. IV application significantly prolonged anesthesia duration compared to the control group. (p = 0.049) Both IV and PN administration of DXN reduced postoperative edema at 3rd (p = 0.048) and 7th day (p = 0.01). Post-procedure pain reduction was significant in the IV group (p = 0.011). On the other hand, it was observed that the pain did not decrease in the PN group at 3rd and 7th days compared to the control and IV groups. CONCLUSIONS: PN and IV DXN administration prolonged anesthesia duration and reduced postoperative edema in ITM surgeries. However, PN DXN administration was associated with increased postoperative pain compared to IV DXN and control groups. Further studies comparing different doses and administration routes of DXN are needed to determine optimal strategies for managing postoperative discomfort in ITM surgeries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was conducted at Ahmet Kelesoglu Faculty of Dentistry with the permission of Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (#04-2022/101). Trial registration is also available at clinicaltrail.gov. (NCT06318013, 26/05/2024).


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone , Molar, Third , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Tooth Extraction , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Male , Female , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Nerve Block/methods , Adult , Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Pain Measurement , Mandibular Nerve/drug effects , Carticaine/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Edema/prevention & control
7.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0300136, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885236

ABSTRACT

Photobiomodulation is a safe option for controlling pain, edema, and trismus when applied postoperatively in third molar surgery. However, administration prior to surgery has been under-explored. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of pre-emptive photobiomodulation in reducing postoperative edema in impacted lower third molar extractions. Two groups of healthy individuals undergoing tooth extraction will be randomly assigned: Control group receiving pre-emptive corticosteroid and simulated photobiomodulation, and Photobiomodulation Group receiving intraoral low-intensity laser and extraoral LED cluster application. The primary outcome will be postoperative edema after 48 h. The secondary outcomes will be pain, trismus dysphagia, and analgesic intake (paracetamol). These outcomes will be assessed at baseline as well as two and seven days after surgery. Adverse effects will be recorded. Data will be presented as means ± SD and a p-value < 0.05 will be indicative of statistical significance.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Tooth Extraction , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction/methods , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Double-Blind Method , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/etiology , Female , Male , Postoperative Period , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adult
8.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(10): 3319-3326, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769823

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of retaining the vessels around the orbicularis oculi muscle on reducing local swelling after blepharoplasty. METHODS: A total of 309 patients undergoing blepharoplasty (total incision) were observed and randomly assigned to three groups; (A) conventional operation; (B) preservation of deep vessels; (C) preservation of anterior vessels of orbicularis oculi muscle. The groups were compared based on intraoperative blood loss, operation time, swelling, satisfaction, and complications. RESULTS: Among the 309 patients, 39 were lost to follow-up. c Additionally, A had the shortest operation time, followed by C with slightly longer duration. On the 7th day, 15th day, and 1 month after surgery, both B and C demonstrated significantly lower levels of swelling compared to A. Moreover, patient satisfaction was higher in B and C than in A. CONCLUSION: Retaining either superficial or deep veins of the orbicularis oculi muscle can effectively reduce short-term postoperative swelling. However, when retaining the superficial central group of this muscle during surgery, it is crucial to strictly control the amount of surrounding tissue around vessels.


Subject(s)
Blepharoplasty , Oculomotor Muscles , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Blepharoplasty/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Oculomotor Muscles/surgery , Oculomotor Muscles/blood supply , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Operative Time , Edema/etiology , Edema/prevention & control , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Eyelids/blood supply , Eyelids/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Aged
9.
J Evid Based Dent Pract ; 24(2): 101983, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821660

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The extraction of third molars is one of the most performed surgical procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Pain, oedema, and trismus are the most frequently complications related in the surgical postoperative period. The literature has indicated PBM as a potential adjuvant method to reduce these complications. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is evaluate the PBM, as an optimal method to improve patient experience and minimize postoperative morbidity. Additionally, we seek to determine which wavelength, site, and frequency of application are most effective. METHODS: This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023429966) and followed PRISMA guidelines. The search was carried out in the main databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Lilacs, including reviews in the most important journals in the area of oral surgery and laser applied to oral surgery. In addition, all article references and also gray literature were reviewed. After the studies selection, the relevant data was collected. All the studies were randomized controlled trials and the patients were allocated into two groups: active PBM and inactive PBM. The statistical analysis was carried out using Stata v.16, and the methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed by the Jadad scale and RoB 2.0, respectively. RESULTS: Where included 22 studies and 989 subjects, to all with a minimum follow-up of 7 days. Pain and oedema showed statistically significant results in favor to the active PBM group. Especially when laser applied in infrared mode, for pain and oedema at 48 h, MD = -1.80 (CI95% -2.88, -0.72) I²â€¯= 92.13% and MD = -1.45 (CI95% -2.42, -0.48) I²â€¯= 65.01%, respectively. The same is not true for trismus at 48 h, MD = 0.07 (CI95% -0.06, 0.21) I²â€¯= 3.26%. The meta-analysis also presented results in respect of laser site of application and number of PBM sessions. CONCLUSIONS: PBM with infrared laser, in a combination intraoral and extraoral application, in one session in the immediate postoperative period, has been shown to be effective to achieve the objectives of reducing pain and oedema after third molar extraction.


Subject(s)
Edema , Low-Level Light Therapy , Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Postoperative Complications , Tooth Extraction , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Mandible/surgery , Trismus/prevention & control , Trismus/etiology
10.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 28(3): 1287-1294, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698248

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: PEMF (pulsed electromagnetic fields) founds application in several medical fields to accelerate bone wounds healing and to reduce inflammation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PEMF in reducing postoperative swelling and pain in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational monocentric study was conducted on a sample of 30 patients undergone to orthognathic surgery in Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of University of Naples Federico II. The patients who followed these inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study: age ≥ 18 years, Class III malocclusion, Surgical procedure of Le Fort I osteotomy + Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy (BSSO), Written informed consent. Patients were divided into two groups: Group SD) postoperative standard treatment with medical therapy and cryotherapy, Group SD + PEMF) postoperative standard therapy + PEMF. Each patient underwent a 3D facial scan, at one (1d) and four (4d) days after surgery to compare the swelling reduction. The pain score was assessed through VAS score and analgesics administration amount. RESULTS: In SD + PEMF group, the facial volume reduction between 1d and 4d scan was on average 56.2 ml (6.23%), while in SD group, it was 23.6 ml (2.63%). The difference between the two groups was 3.6% (p = 0.0168). VAS pain values were significantly higher in SD group compared to SD + PEMF group in the second day after surgery (P = 0.021) and in the total 4 days (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that PEMF is valid tool to promote faster postoperative swelling and pain reduction in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.


Subject(s)
Edema , Orthognathic Surgical Procedures , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Edema/prevention & control , Female , Male , Adult , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Young Adult , Magnetic Field Therapy/methods , Pain Measurement , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/surgery , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/therapy , Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus/methods , Adolescent , Cryotherapy/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Electromagnetic Fields
11.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(4): 1219-1224, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722732

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sterile saline solution irrigation (lavage) performed after mandibular third molar extraction on postoperative complications, utilizing a split-mouth randomized clinical trial design. METHODS: Seventeen healthy participants requiring bilateral mandibular third molar extraction were enrolled in this single-center study. In each participant, one impacted third molar was designated as the experimental group and subjected to saline lavage at 4 °C. In contrast, the control group was the other impacted third molar, undergoing saline lavage at 25 °C. Various parameters, including postoperative pain, mouth opening, and facial swelling, were assessed using standardized measures and three-dimensional facial scanning at multiple time points. RESULTS: The average age of participants was 26.66 ± 4.1 years, with no postoperative complications observed in either group. The duration of surgery did not significantly differ between groups. Postoperative pain was significantly reduced in the experimental group during the immediate postoperative period compared with the control group, but this difference diminished over time. No significant differences were observed in mouth opening or facial swelling between groups at any time. CONCLUSION: In site 4 °C, sterile saline solution irrigation after mandibular third molar extraction may effectively reduce early postoperative complications, particularly pain, without prolonging surgical duration.


Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Saline Solution , Therapeutic Irrigation , Tooth Extraction , Tooth, Impacted , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Saline Solution/administration & dosage , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Adult , Male , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Female , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Mandible/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/etiology , Pain Measurement
12.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(8): 2581-2591, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571374

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the rise in interest and demand for body contouring, beauty devices have continuously developed. Suction can aid in increasing the rate of fat breakdown by inducing a massage-like effect, thereby increasing blood flow. Moreover, radiofrequency (RF) can boost fibroblast activity and help reduce cellulite. In addition, electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) can use electrical stimulation to induce muscle contraction, leading to an athletic, and skin elasticity-increasing effect. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the effects of body contouring, such as cellulite and swelling, in healthy Korean women to objectively prove the efficacy of an at-home beauty device equipped with suction, RF, and EMS functions. METHODS: For 8 weeks, 21 participants used the at-home beauty device 3 days a week on their abdomen, thighs, and left calf. Validity assessments and subjective surveys were conducted at 4 and 8 weeks, including the first visit. RESULTS: The results of the validity assessments revealed that cellulite, swelling, elasticity, femoral skin texture, and dermal density were significantly (p < 0.05) improved in the experimental group compared with those at the baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the combination of suction, RF, and EMS function is effective for body skin, fat, and body shape management. For better body-contouring effects, combining the beauty device with regular exercise and healthy eating habits is recommended.


Subject(s)
Body Contouring , Humans , Female , Body Contouring/methods , Body Contouring/instrumentation , Adult , Suction/instrumentation , Elasticity/radiation effects , Cellulite/therapy , Thigh , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Leg , Young Adult , Radiofrequency Therapy/instrumentation , Skin/radiation effects , Edema/etiology , Edema/prevention & control , Republic of Korea
13.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(7): 840-851, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615694

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pain, swelling, and trismus are the most common sequalae following the surgical removal of mandibular third molars. They pose significant challenges for clinicians, prompting the exploration of efficacious management approaches. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of transbuccal mucoadhesive patch of diclofenac sodium versus an oral tablet in controlling the aforesaid sequelae. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A prospective split-mouth, single-blinded study was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at AMC Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad. The study sample included patients of either sex, aged 18 to 45 years, requiring surgical removal of bilaterally symmetrical mandibular third molars under local anesthesia. Patients who had consumed analgesics within 24 hours prior to the procedure were excluded. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The primary predictor variable was the route of administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. The study group received transbuccal mucoadhesive patches containing 20 mg diclofenac sodium, whereas the control group received oral tablets of 50 mg. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: Postoperative pain, measured with visual analog scale, was the primary outcome variable, whereas swelling, mouth opening, onset of analgesic effect, and adverse events were assessed as secondary outcome variables. COVARIATES: Two categories of covariates were considered. First, demographic: age and gender. Second, perioperative: pattern of impaction. ANALYSES: Intergroup comparison was made using a paired sample t-test and an independent sample t-test, while intragroup differences were assessed with a one-way ANOVA and a paired t-test. P value ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Out of 146 patients screened initially, the final study sample included 37 subjects with a mean age of 26.08 ± 5.09 years (21 (56.75%) males and 16 (43.25%) females). The study group exhibited a significantly lower postoperative pain score compared to the control group on days 0, 1, 2, and 3 postoperatively (P ≤ .05). No statistically significant difference was observed in reduction of facial swelling and improvement in mouth opening on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd days postoperatively between both the groups (P ≥ .05). The mean onset of analgesia was statistically significant in the study group (19.96 ± 5.40 minutes) compared to the control group (52.56 ± 6.33 minutes) (P < .001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Transbuccal mucoadhesive patch of diclofenac sodium offers effective pain control with quicker analgesia and fewer side effects compared to an oral tablet.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Diclofenac , Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Tooth Extraction , Humans , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/therapeutic use , Molar, Third/surgery , Female , Adult , Male , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Administration, Oral , Edema/etiology , Edema/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Trismus/prevention & control , Trismus/etiology , Transdermal Patch
14.
Quintessence Int ; 55(5): 380-390, 2024 05 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619256

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the impact of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (iPRF) and concentrated growth factor on postoperative pain, edema, trismus, and quality of life in impacted mandibular third molar surgery. The primary aim of this study was to minimize common sequelae following third molar surgery by using iPRF and concentrated growth factor. The secondary objective was to compare the postoperative effects of these products. METHOD AND MATERIALS: This study represents a single-center, randomized prospective clinical trial conducted at the Ordu University Faculty of Dentistry. It involved patients who underwent third molar surgery for various reasons between July and October 2022. The predictor variables were the use of concentrated growth factor and i-PRF. They were categorized as concentrated growth factor, i-PRF, and control groups. The outcome variables include pain levels and analgesic consumption measured on a visual analog scale, distances between predetermined anatomical points, maximum mouth opening capacity, and data from the postoperative symptom severity (PoSSe) scale. Some statistical tests were performed with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered significant. RESULTS: Total analgesic use was notably lower in the concentrated growth factor group (P = .044). Concentrated growth factor and iPRF outperformed the control group in all edema measurements by postoperative day 7 (tragus-pogonion, lateral canthus-angulus, tragus-commissura; P < .05). Concentrated growth factor significantly reduced trismus on days 2 and 7. Quality of life was notably higher in the concentrated growth factor group than in the control group (P = .026), although iPRF group differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that concentrated growth factor has a limited impact on postoperative pain, but significantly reduces edema, trismus, and enhances quality of life. The iPRF group experienced positive effects on pain, edema, and trismus, although the statistically significant differences observed with concentrated growth factor highlight its potential for use instead of iPRF after third molar surgery. An increased sample size is essential for more comprehensive results.


Subject(s)
Edema , Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Quality of Life , Tooth, Impacted , Trismus , Humans , Molar, Third/surgery , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Adult , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/etiology , Trismus/prevention & control , Trismus/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Tooth Extraction , Pain Measurement , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/therapeutic use
15.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 40(5): 523-532, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687303

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of preoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) administered intravenously (IV) versus subcutaneously on postoperative ecchymosis and edema in patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty. METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty at a single-center. Eligible participants were randomized to preoperatively receive either (1) 1 g of TXA in 100 ml normal saline IV, (2) 50 µl/ml of TXA in local anesthesia, or (3) no TXA. Primary outcomes included ecchymosis and edema at postoperative day 1 (POD1) and 7 (POD7). Secondary outcomes included operative time, pain, time until resuming activities of daily living, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. RESULTS: By comparison (IV TXA vs. local subcutaneous TXA vs. no TXA), ecchymosis scores were significantly lower on POD1 (1.31 vs. 1.56 vs. 2.09, p = 0.02) and on POD7 (0.51 vs. 0.66 vs. 0.98, p = 0.04) among those that received TXA. By comparison (IV TXA vs. local subcutaneous TXA vs. no TXA), significant reductions in edema scores occurred in those that received TXA on POD1 (1.59 vs. 1.43 vs. 1.91, p = 0.005) and on POD7 (0.85 vs. 0.60 vs. 0.99, p = 0.04). By comparison (IV TXA vs. local subcutaneous TXA vs. no TXA) patients treated with intravenous and local subcutaneous TXA preoperatively were more likely to experience shorter operative times (10.8 vs. 11.8 vs. 12.9 minutes, p = 0.01), reduced time to resuming activities of daily livings (1.6 vs. 1.6 vs. 2.3 days, p < 0.0001), and higher satisfaction scores at POD1 (8.8 vs. 8.7 vs. 7.9, p = 0.0002). No adverse events occurred were reported. CONCLUSION: In an analysis of 106 patients, preoperative TXA administered either IV or subcutaneously safely reduced postoperative ecchymosis and edema in patients undergoing upper eyelid blepharoplasty. While statistical superiority between intravenous versus local subcutaneous TXA treatment was not definitively identified, our results suggest clinical superiority with IV dosing.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Blepharoplasty , Ecchymosis , Edema , Postoperative Complications , Tranexamic Acid , Humans , Ecchymosis/etiology , Ecchymosis/prevention & control , Tranexamic Acid/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Prospective Studies , Blepharoplasty/methods , Female , Male , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Edema/prevention & control , Edema/etiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Injections, Subcutaneous , Preoperative Care/methods , Eyelids/surgery , Eyelid Diseases/etiology , Eyelid Diseases/surgery , Administration, Intravenous
16.
Med. oral patol. oral cir. bucal (Internet) ; 29(2): e211-e218, Mar. 2024. ilus, tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-231224

ABSTRACT

Background: The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) stimulus inhibits the activity of nociceptive neurons of the central nervous system. Pain relief is achieved by increasing the pulse amplitude of TENS to induce a non-painful paranesthesia beneath the electrodes. This study aimed to assess the effect of TENS on acute pain, edema, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted third molars.Material and Methods: This randomized, double blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted on 37 patients with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars. The angle and body of mandible at the site of surgery in one randomly selected quadrant underwent TENS immediately after surgery (50 Hz, 100-μs short pulse, 15 minutes for 6 days). The TENS stimulator device was used in off mode for the placebo quadrant. The pain score (primary outcome) was measured for 7 days postoperatively, and edema and trismus (secondary outcomes) were assessed at 2, 4 and 7 days, postoperatively. The results were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA using R software (alpha=0.05). Results: The overall mean pain score was significantly lower in the TENS than the placebo group (P<0.05). The number of taken analgesics in the first 3 days was significantly lower in the TENS group (P<0.001). Postoperative edema in the TENS group was lower than the placebo group but only the difference was not statistically significant (P>.05). The inter-incisal distance, as an index to assess trismus, was not significantly different between the two group at day 2, but it was significantly higher in the TENS group after the second day (P<0.001)...(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Molar, Third/surgery , Trismus/etiology , Acute Pain , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation , Edema/prevention & control , Tooth, Impacted , Oral Medicine , Oral Health , Pathology, Oral , Edema/etiology , Trismus/prevention & control
18.
Nutrients ; 16(6)2024 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38542694

ABSTRACT

A three-arm, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study was conducted to assess the impact of lyophilized pineapple extract with titrated bromelain (Brome-Inf®) and purified bromelain on pain, swelling, trismus, and quality of life (QoL) following the surgical extraction of the mandibular third molars. Furthermore, this study examined the need for Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) by comparing their effects with a placebo group. This study enrolled 42 individuals requiring the extraction of a single mandibular third molar under local anesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned to receive Brome-Inf®, purified bromelain, or a placebo orally, initiating treatment on the day of surgery and continuing for the next 7 days. The primary outcome measured was the requirement for NSAIDs in the three groups. Pain, swelling, and trismus were secondary outcome variables, evaluated postoperatively at 1, 3, and 7 days. This study also assessed the comparative efficacy of freeze-dried pineapple extract and single-component bromelain. Ultimately, the placebo group showed a statistically higher need for ibuprofen (from days 1 to 7) at the study's conclusion (p < 0.0001). In addition, reductions in pain and swelling were significantly higher in both the bromelain and pineapple groups (p < 0.0001 for almost all patients, at all intervals) than in the placebo group. The active groups also demonstrated a significant difference in QoL compared to the placebo group (p < 0.001). A non-significant reduction in trismus occurred in the treatment groups compared to the placebo group. Therefore, the administration of pineapple extract titrated in bromelain showed significant analgesic and anti-edema effects in addition to improving QoL in the postoperative period for patients who had undergone mandibular third molar surgery. Moreover, both bromelain and Brome-Inf® supplementation reduced the need for ibuprofen to comparable extents, proving that they are good alternatives to NSAIDs in making the postoperative course more comfortable for these patients. A further investigation with larger samples is necessary to assess the pain-relieving and anti-inflammatory impacts of the entire pineapple phytocomplex in surgical procedures aside from mandibular third molar surgery.


Subject(s)
Ananas , Ibuprofen , Humans , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Molar, Third/surgery , Quality of Life , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Bromelains/therapeutic use , Trismus/drug therapy , Trismus/etiology , Trismus/prevention & control , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Edema/drug therapy , Edema/etiology , Edema/prevention & control , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects
19.
JBJS Rev ; 12(3)2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Kinesio taping (KT) has been shown to be clinically effective in a wide range of musculoskeletal disorders. Despite evidence supporting KT, there still needs to be more certainty regarding its clinical worthiness in managing postoperative conditions. This study aims to assess the effect of postoperative KT on knee edema, pain, and range of motion (ROM) when added to routine physiotherapy after knee surgery. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases were searched from their inception to July 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing routine physiotherapy with and without KT were included. Random-effect models were used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD), confidence interval, and heterogeneity (I2). RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs on 842 operated knees were included. KT reduced knee edema in first week (SMD, -0.59, p < 0.001), 14th postoperative day (POD) (SMD, -0.78, p < 0.001), and 28 to 42 days postop (SMD, -0.66, p < 0.001). The KT demonstrated significant pain improvement in second week (SMD, -0.87, p < 0.001) and the fourth week (SMD, -0.53, p < 0.001). The KT groups demonstrated ROM improvement within second week (SMD, 0.69, p = 0.010) and in the 28th POD (SMD, 0.89, p = 0.009). Subgroup analysis demonstrated minimal heterogeneity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) cases. However, it did not show significant superiority regarding ankle, calf, or thigh edema and Lysholm scale. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that adding KT to routine postoperative physiotherapy reduces pain and knee edema after total knee arthroplasty or ACLR. Low to very low certainty of evidence for all outcomes and the limited number of studies emphasize the need for more high-quality primary studies to explore the optimal method of KT application and its effectiveness in specific knee surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Athletic Tape , Edema , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Range of Motion, Articular , Humans , Edema/etiology , Edema/prevention & control , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/rehabilitation , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/rehabilitation , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Knee Joint/surgery , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Postoperative Care/methods
20.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(4): 234, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556559

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) on prevention of postoperative complications in the impacted third molar extraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 healthy patients with symmetrical bilaterally impacted third molars (50 extraction sites) were enrolled in this split-mouth, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Third molar extractions were performed in both sites of the mandible at the same appointment. Randomization was performed using a coin toss to choose the test and control sites. CGF was placed in the extraction socket and the socket was sutured (test group), while the contralateral socket was only sutured (control group). Each patient acted as their own control. The primary outcome were pain assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and facial swelling on the1st, 3rd and 7th postoperative days. The secondary outcomes were bone healing in extraction sockets through alveolar bone height (ABH) and alveolar bone density (ABD) evaluated by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) immediately after extraction and in the 3rd and 6th months. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (12 female, 13 male; mean age 29.17) with bilateral impacted third molars participated in the study. A statistically significant reduction in pain was determined on the 3rd and 7th postoperative days in the CGF sites compared to the control sites while no statistically significant difference was found between the groups on the 1st postoperative day (3rd day, p = 0.009; 7th day, p = 0.039). There were no statistically significant differences in facial swelling and bone healing between the test and control groups at different time intervals, although the data obtained were slightly favoring the CGF group (p > 0.05). There were no serious adverse effects such as infection, alveolitis, paraesthesia, fracture through the follow-up period in all of the cases. CONCLUSION: The study has demonstrated the effect of CGF on relieving the severity of pain after the third molar extraction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Placement of CGF in the extraction socket could relieve postoperative pain and reduce patient discomfort after the third molar extraction. CGF is recommended during the third molar extraction due to its good biological effects, low cost and simple preparation procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300077819.


Subject(s)
Molar, Third , Tooth, Impacted , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Edema/prevention & control , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins , Molar, Third/surgery , Mouth , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Tooth Extraction/methods , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Double-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL