Epinephrine Dosing Intervals Are Associated With Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVES: Data to support epinephrine dosing intervals during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are conflicting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between epinephrine dosing intervals and outcomes. We hypothesized that dosing intervals less than 3 minutes would be associated with improved neurologic survival compared with greater than or equal to 3 minutes. DESIGN: This study is a secondary analysis of The ICU-RESUScitation Project (NCT028374497), a multicenter trial of a quality improvement bundle of physiology-directed CPR training and post-cardiac arrest debriefing. SETTING: Eighteen PICUs and pediatric cardiac ICUs in the United States. PATIENTS: Subjects were 18 years young or younger and 37 weeks old or older corrected gestational age who had an index cardiac arrest. Patients who received less than two doses of epinephrine, received extracorporeal CPR, or had dosing intervals greater than 8 minutes were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: The primary exposure was an epinephrine dosing interval of less than 3 vs. greater than or equal to 3 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was survival to discharge with a favorable neurologic outcome defined as a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 1-2 or no change from baseline. Regression models evaluated the association between dosing intervals and: 1) survival outcomes and 2) CPR duration. Among 382 patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, median age was 0.9 years (interquartile range 0.3-7.6 yr) and 45% were female. After adjustment for confounders, dosing intervals less than 3 minutes were not associated with survival with favorable neurologic outcome (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.84-1.46; p = 0.48) but were associated with improved sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (aRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37; p < 0.01) and shorter CPR duration (adjusted effect estimate, -9.5 min; 95% CI, -14.4 to -4.84 min; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving at least two doses of epinephrine, dosing intervals less than 3 minutes were not associated with neurologic outcome but were associated with sustained ROSC and shorter CPR duration.

[Characterization of patients with anaphylaxis in a tertiary hospital in Medellin, Colombia (2009-2019)]. / Identificación de pacientes con anafilaxia en una institución de salud de tercer nivel de Medellín, Colombia (2009-2019).

OBJECTIVE: To characterize demographically and clinically the patients with anaphylaxis treated in a third level health institution in Medellin, Colombia. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive observational study was carried out, which includedpatients were diagnosed with anaphylaxis between 2009 and 2019. Information was retrieved from medical records through a collection instrument. Subsequently, a descriptive statistical analysis of proportions and measures of central tendency of the variables of interest was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1820 records were reviewed and data from 253 patients were included. Among the reported comorbidities, drug allergy was the most prevalent (28%). The most frequent manifestations of anaphylaxis were cutaneous and respiratory. Most of the cases presented basal tryptase values ≤ 11.4 ng/mL (94.7%). Different etiological agents (food, drugs, insects and latex) were reported, and their frequency varied according to age. Adrenaline, steroids, and antihistamines were the treatments of choice in 39.9, 34.3, and 39.9% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of anaphylaxis in a medical center in Colombia coincide with those reported in Latin American. The treatment of anaphylaxis is not standardized, which makes it necessary to educate the health personnel and develop national guidelines.

OBJECTIVO: Identificar las características clínicas y demográficas de pacientes con anafilaxia, atendidos en un hospital de tercer nivel de Medellín, Colombia. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte transversal, al que se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico con anafilaxia entre 2009 y 2019. La información de los pacientes se obtuvo a partir de los expedientes clínicos, mediante un instrumento de recolección. Se realizó un análisis estadístico descriptivo, de proporciones y medidas de tendencia central de las variables de interés. RESULTADOS: Se revisaron 1820 expedientes y se incluyeron los datos de 253 pacientes. Los agentes etiológicos más frecuentes fueron: medicamentos (52.1%), alimentos (34.7%), picadura de insectos (13.8%) y agentes no especificados (17.7%). Las manifestaciones cutáneas y respiratorias fueron las más frecuentes asociadas con anafilaxia. El 94.7% de los casos tuvo concentraciones normales de triptasa. La adrenalina, los corticosteroides y antihistamínicos fueron los fármacos de elección en el 39.9, 34.3 y 39.9% de los casos, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: Las características de anafilaxia coinciden con las reportadas en la mayor parte de los estudios en Latinoamérica. Aunque existen guías mundiales de tratamiento de la anafilaxia, no suelen aplicarse de forma uniforme, lo que hace necesario adiestrar al personal de salud y desarrollar guías nacionales al respecto.

[Introduction to food allergy]. / Introducción en alergia alimentaria.

Food allergy is a common chronic disorder that affects infants, children, adolescents, and adults. The prevalence of food allergy has increased in recent decades throughout the world, not limited to Western countries. Since there is no treatment, this focuses on avoiding allergens, in addition to educating patients and caregivers in the emergency treatment of acute reactions, for example: application of epinephrine. Studies suggest that accidental reactions occur in about 45% of children with food allergies each year, although most reactions are mild or moderate in severity. Hospital admissions for food anaphylaxis vary from 4 to 20 per 100,000 inhabitants; Deaths are rare, with an estimated incidence of 0.03 to 0.3 per million people with food allergy. Death from food anaphylaxis is rare and appears to have remained stable, possibly due to increases in food allergen labeling, diagnostic services, rates of intramuscular epinephrine prescription, and awareness of food allergies. Omalizumab is a drug approved for several disorders (chronic hives or difficult asthma) and may help reduce symptoms associated with food allergy. The relative importance of alternative technologies, management strategies and policies for food allergy varies from one region to another, due to differences in the epidemiology, education, socioeconomic well-being, and cultural preferences of the population.

La alergia alimentaria es un trastorno crónico frecuente que afecta a lactantes, niños, adolescentes y adultos. La prevalencia de alergia alimentaria se ha incrementado en las últimas décadas en todo el mundo, sin limitarse a los países occidentales. Puesto que no existe ningún tratamiento, éste se centra en evitar los alergenos, además de la educación de pacientes y cuidadores en el tratamiento de urgencia de las reacciones agudas, por ejemplo: aplicación de epinefrina. Los estudios sugieren que las reacciones accidentales ocurren en alrededor del 45% de los niños con alergia alimentaria cada año, aunque la mayor parte de las reacciones son de gravedad leve o moderada. Los ingresos hospitalarios por anafilaxia alimentaria varían de 4 a 20 por cada 100,000 habitantes; las muertes son raras, con una incidencia estimada de 0.03 a 0.3 por cada millón de personas con alergia alimentaria. La muerte por anafilaxia alimentaria es rara y parece haberse mantenido estable, posiblemente por el aumento en el etiquetado de alérgenos alimentarios, los servicios de diagnóstico, las tasas de prescripción de epinefrina intramuscular y la concienciación acerca de alergias alimentarias. Omalizumab es un fármaco aprobado para varias alteraciones (urticaria crónica o asma difícil) y puede ayudar a reducir los síntomas asociados con la alergia alimentaria. La importancia relativa de las tecnologías alternativas, las estrategias de gestión y las políticas para la alergia alimentaria varía de una región a otra, debido a las diferencias en la epidemiología, educación, bienestar socioeconómico y preferencias culturales de la población.

[Treatment for living with food allergy]. / Tratamiento en pacientes con alergia alimentaria.

The treatment of food allergy involves completely removing the allergenic food from the diet, careful label reading, and ingredient awareness. Family education is crucial, understanding alternative names for the allergen. An emergency action plan provided by the doctor, with clear instructions for epinephrine application and when to seek medical attention, is essential. For mild to moderate symptoms, oral antihistamines may be prescribed. Psychological support is necessary due to emotional repercussions. Collaboration with an allergy specialist is crucial for personalized treatment. Natural tolerance to the food may be achieved, especially in non-IgE-mediated allergies. However, some allergic manifestations persist, requiring treatment alternatives. Avoidance of the allergen and epinephrine application are key measures. Immunotherapy aims to desensitize immune cells, but its effectiveness varies. Bioterapeutic agents, such as monoclonal antibodies, are under investigation, although their clinical use still requires more studies.

El tratamiento de la alergia alimentaria implica la completa eliminación del alimento alergénico de la dieta, lectura minuciosa de etiquetas y conciencia sobre ingredientes. La educación familiar es crucial, comprendiendo los nombres alternativos del alérgeno. Se debe contar con un plan de acción de urgencia proporcionado por el médico, con instrucciones claras para la aplicación de epinefrina y cuándo buscar atención médica. Para síntomas leves a moderados, se pueden recetar antihistamínicos. El apoyo psicológico es esencial debido a las repercusiones emocionales. La colaboración con un especialista en alergias es crucial para un tratamiento personalizado. La tolerancia natural al alimento puede lograrse, especialmente en alergias no mediadas por IgE. Sin embargo, algunas manifestaciones alérgicas persisten, requiriendo alternativas de tratamiento. La evitación del alergeno y la aplicación de epinefrina son medidas clave. La inmunoterapia busca desensibilizar las células inmunológicas, pero su efectividad varía. Los agentes bioterapéuticos, como anticuerpos monoclonales, se investigan, aunque su uso clínico aún requiere más estudios.

[Food anaphylaxis]. / Anafilaxia por alimentos.

Anaphylaxis, a potentially life-threatening reaction, is characterized by acute symptoms affecting various systems and requires immediate medical intervention. While the overall mortality rate is low, anaphylaxis induced by foods and drugs has seen an increase. Common triggers include foods, drugs, and Hymenoptera venom. Epidemiology varies by region and age, with a global incidence of 50-112 episodes per 100,000 people annually. Implicated foods vary by age and region, with peanuts and nuts being common triggers. Two mechanisms of anaphylaxis are recognized: IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated. Diagnosis is based on clinical criteria and serum tryptase levels. Treatment includes epinephrine, oxygen, and intravenous fluids. Exercise-induced food-dependent anaphylaxis is addressed, where exercise, combined with certain foods, triggers anaphylactic reactions. Proper understanding and management are crucial to mitigate risks.

La anafilaxia, una reacción potencialmente mortal, se caracteriza por la aparición aguda de síntomas que afectan diversos sistemas y requiere intervención médica inmediata. Aunque la tasa de mortalidad general es baja, la anafilaxia inducida por alimentos y fármacos ha experimentado un aumento. Los alimentos, fármacos y veneno de himenópteros son desencadenantes comunes. La epidemiología varía según la región y la edad, con una incidencia global de 50-112 episodios anuales por cada 100,000 personas. Los alimentos más implicados varían según la edad y la región, y los desencadenantes más comunes son cacahuetes y nueces. Se reconocen dos mecanismos de anafilaxia: mediado por IgE y no mediado por IgE. El diagnóstico se basa en criterios clínicos y niveles de triptasa sérica. El tratamiento incluye epinefrina, oxígeno y líquidos intravenosos. Se aborda la anafilaxia inducida por ejercicio dependiente de alimentos, donde el ejercicio, en combinación con ciertos alimentos, desencadena reacciones anafilácticas. La comprensión y el manejo adecuados son cruciales para mitigar riesgos.

El auge y la caída del mito de la epinefrina en la mano / The Rise and Fall of the Epinephrine Myth in the Hand

La posibilidad de operar a los pacientes con afecciones de la mano bajo anestesia local con la lidocaína y la epinefrina usando la técnica WALANT provocó una revolución en la cirugía de la mano, que facilitó la vida de los pacientes y disminuyó los costos de los servicios hospitalarios. Es necesario que los cirujanos conozcan la técnica y la historia de esta técnica. El objetivo fue identificar los orígenes del auge y la caída del mito y del dogma de la prohibición de la adrenalina en los bloqueos anestésicos de los dedos. Se realizó un análisis crítico de los principales textos de los artículos y los libros sobre el uso de la epinefrina en la anestesia de los dedos. La creación del mito de prohibir el uso de la epinefrina en los bloqueos anestésicos de los dedos se produjo debido a la mala interpretación de los informes de los casos de necrosis ocurridos que, en realidad, no fueron causados por la epinefrina. Ese mito influyó en la aparición de un dogma. La historia del uso de la epinefrina en los bloqueos de los dedos anestésicos demuestra que las interpretaciones superficiales y erróneas de las complicaciones clínicas publicadas como informes de casos pueden generar mitos y dogmas. Solo la ciencia puede prevenir y destruir tales mitos y dogmas médicos(AU)

The possibility of operating patients with hand conditions under local anesthesia, with lidocaine and epinephrine, using WALANT technique caused a revolution in hand surgery, which made life easier for patients and lowered the costs of hospital services. Surgeons need to be aware of the possibilities and history of WALANT technique. The objective was to identify the origins of the rise and fall of the myth and dogma of the prohibition of adrenaline in anesthetic finger blocks. A critical analysis of the main texts of the articles and books on the use of epinephrine in finger anesthesia was carried out. The conception of the myth of banning the use of epinephrine in anesthetic finger blocks occurred due to misinterpretation of reports of necrosis occurring, which were not actually caused by epinephrine. That myth influenced the appearance of a dogma. The history of the use of epinephrine in anesthetic finger blocks demonstrates that superficial and misleading interpretations of clinical complications published as case reports can breed myth and dogma. Only science can prevent and destroy such medical myths and dogmas(AU)

Assessment of The Addition of Epinephrine to Intra-articular Bupivacaine for the Control of Acute Pain in Patients underwent to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / Avaliação da adição da epinefrina à bupivacaína intra-articular no controle da dor aguda em pacientes submetidos a reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior

Abstract Objective To evaluate postoperative pain, using the visual analog scale (VAS), in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and receiving intra-articular anesthetic solutions. Methods The present is a randomized clinical trial with a sample of 48 patients divided into 4 groups: Group I (n » 12) - 20 mL of saline solution (control); Group II (n » 12) - 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine; Group III (n » 12) - 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine þ 0.1 mg of epinephrine; and Group IV (n » 12) - 20 mL of saline solution þ 0.1 mg of epinephrine. These solutions were injected into the knee at the end of the surgery. Pain was assessed using the VAS immediately and 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after the procedure. Results The VAS scores were highly variable among the groups. A Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance (ANOVA), considering a level of significance of 5%, revealed that all intra-articular anesthetic solutions influenced the assessment of pain (p » 0.003), and that Group-III subjects presented less postoperative pain. There was no evidence of a higher or lower use of supplemental analgesic agents, or of adverse effects resulting from these anesthetic solutions. Conclusion Bupivacaine combined with epinephrine was the most effective solution for pain control in patients undergoing ACLR, but with no statistically significant differences when compared to Group II (p » 0.547). There was no decrease or increase in the use of supplemental analgesics or in the occurrence of adverse systemic effects (p > 0.05).

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar primariamente a dor pós-operatória, por meio da escala visual analógica (EVA), nos pacientes submetidos a reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior (RLCA) que receberam soluções anestésicas intra-articulares (IAs). Métodos Ensaio clínico randomizado com uma amostra de 48 pacientes, divididos em 4 grupos: Grupo I (n » 12) - 20 ml de solução fisiológica (controle); Grupo II (n » 12) - 20 ml de bupivacaína a 0,5%; Grupo III (n » 12) - 20 ml de bupivacaína a 0,5% þ 0,1 mg de epinefrina; e Grupo IV (n » 12) - 20 ml de solução fisiológica þ 0,1 mg de epinefrina, injetados no joelho ao término da cirurgia. A dor foi avaliada pela EVA imediatamente e 6, 12, 24 e 48 horas após o procedimento. Resultados Observou-se grande variabilidade nos resultados da EVA entre os pacientes avaliados em cada grupo. Verificou-se, pela análise de variância (analysis of variance, ANOVA) de Kruskal-Wallis, considerando um nível de 5% de significância, que as soluções anestésicas IAs de cada grupo influenciaram na avaliação da dor desses pacientes (p » 0,003), sendo os do Grupo III os que apresentaram menor dor pósoperatória. Não se evidenciou um maior ou menor consumo de drogas analgésicas suplementares, ou efeitos adversos das decorrentes das soluções empregadas. Conclusão A solução combinada de bupivacaína e epinefrina foi a mais eficaz no controle da dor nos pacientes submetidos a RLCA, mas sem diferenças estatisticamente significativas com relação ao grupo II (p » 0,547). Não se observou diminuição ou aumento no consumo de analgésicos suplementares, ou o aparecimento de efeitos sistêmicos adversos (p > 0,05).

Variation in Prehospital Protocols for Pediatric Respiratory Distress Management in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare statewide emergency medical services protocols for the management of pediatric respiratory distress. METHODS: We performed a descriptive study of emergency medical services protocols for the management of pediatric respiratory distress in the United States, excluding those without model or mandatory protocols. We compared medication recommendations for specific disease processes, including asthma, croup, epiglottitis, anaphylaxis, generalized respiratory distress, intubation, and drug assisted intubation. RESULTS: Thirty-four state protocols were included. All had protocols to address the management of pediatric respiratory distress. There was high agreement in albuterol use for bronchospasm and epinephrine use in anaphylaxis. Epinephrine was recommended in all anaphylaxis protocols, 27 croup protocols (79%), and 3 epiglottitis protocols (9%). Six states (18%) called for albuterol in patients with generalized respiratory distress. Steroid recommendations and indications had variance among states; 26 states (76%) allowed steroid use in patients with asthma, 19 states (56%) recommended steroid use in anaphylaxis, and 11 (32%) recommended steroid use in croup protocols. The route for steroid administration also varied among protocols. Five states (15%) allowed continuous positive airway pressure application in pediatric patients, whereas endotracheal intubation and rapid sequence intubations had varying requirements as well as recommendations for use. Twelve (35%) listed impending or current respiratory failure as an indication, whereas other states had specific markers, such as Glasgow Coma Scale or oxygen saturation, as indications. CONCLUSIONS: All included states had specific recommendations for the management of pediatric respiratory distress. There was consistency in recommendations for albuterol use for wheezing and epinephrine use for anaphylaxis. However, there was wide variability in other uses for epinephrine, steroid administration, continuous positive airway pressure use, and specific treatments for croup and epiglottitis. The findings of this study provide a base for important future evidence-based protocol developments and changes in prehospital pediatric respiratory distress treatment.

Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Corticosteroids and Inhaled Epinephrine for Bronchiolitis in Children in Intensive Care.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the combination of systemic corticosteroids and nebulized epinephrine, compared with standard care, reduces the duration of positive pressure support in children with bronchiolitis admitted to intensive care. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial between July 2013 and November 2019 in children younger than 18 months old with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis. The intervention group received the equivalent of 13 mg/kg prednisolone over 3 days, then 1 mg/kg daily for 3 days, plus 0.05 mL/kg of nebulized 1% epinephrine made up to 6 ml with 0.9% saline via jet nebulizer and mask using oxygen at 12 l/min every 30 minutes for 5 doses, then 1-4 hourly for 3 days, then as required for 3 days. The primary outcome was clinician-managed duration of positive pressure support in intensive care defined as high-flow nasal-prong oxygen, nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure, or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: In total, 210 children received positive pressure support. In the corticosteroid-epinephrine group, 107 children received positive pressure support for a geometric mean of 26 (95% CI, 22-32) hours compared with 40 (95% CI 34-47) hours in 103 controls, adjusted ratio 0.66 (95% CI 0.51-0.84), P = .001. In the intervention group, 41 (38%) children experienced at least 1 adverse event, compared with 39 (38%) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In children with severe bronchiolitis, the duration of clinician-managed pressure support was reduced by regular treatment with systemic corticosteroids and inhaled epinephrine compared with standard care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian Clinical Trials Research Network: ACTRN12613000316707.

[Causes and treatment of anaphylaxis in a Mexican third-level pediatric hospital]. / Causas y tratamiento de anafilaxia en un hospital pediátrico mexicano de tercer nivel.

OBJECTIVE: To clinically characterize the events of anaphylaxis in a third-level pediatric hospital. METHODS: 1148 clinical records were reviewed. Eventually, the information of 35 events of anaphylaxis in 20 patients was analyzed; three of them had multiple episodes of anaphylaxis. RESULTS: The median age for the anaphylactic episodes was 11 years (Interquartile range 10 years, Q1 = 5, Q3 = 15), predominantly in adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17 years, and there was a slight predominance in women. The most frequent clinical manifestations were cutaneous (86%), followed by respiratory (83%), cardiovascular (74%), and gastrointestinal (46%) alterations. Cardiac arrest was documented in three episodes; however, no anaphylaxis-related deaths were reported. The main triggers for anaphylaxis were food (34%), medications (29%), allergen-specific immunotherapy (14%), and latex (11%). In patients with perioperative anaphylaxis, the clinical behavior was severe. Epinephrine was administered in 27 out of the 35 events (77%), but only in 11 cases it was the first-line treatment. Systemic corticosteroids were the most frequently used treatment, followed by epinephrine and antihistamines. CONCLUSIONS: The use of epinephrine, which is the mainstay of the treatment, is suboptimal; with a preferred use of second-line medications like corticosteroids. Clear protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis, as well as continuous education of health personnel, are necessary.

Objetivo: Caracterizar clínicamente los eventos de anafilaxia en un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel. Métodos: Se revisaron 1148 expedientes clínicos. Finalmente, se analizó la información correspondiente a 35 episodios de anafilaxia en 20 pacientes; tres de ellos con múltiples episodios de anafilaxia. Resultados: La edad mediana de los episodios de anafilaxia fue de 11 años (rango intercuartilar 10 años, Q1 = 5, Q3 = 15), con predomino en adolescentes de 12 a 17 años y del sexo femenino. Las manifestaciones clínicas más frecuentes fueron las cutáneas (86 %), seguidas de las respiratorias (83 %), las cardiovasculares (74 %) y las gastrointestinales (46 %). En tres casos se documentó paro cardiorrespiratorio, pero no hubo casos de mortalidad asociada a anafilaxia. Los principales desencadenantes fueron alimentos (34 %), medicamentos (29 %), inmunoterapia para alérgenos (14 %) y látex (11 %). En los pacientes con anafilaxia perioperatoria el comportamiento clínico fue grave. La adrenalina se utilizó en 27 de los 35 episodios (77 %), en 11 de ellos fue el tratamiento de primera elección. Los corticosteroides sistémicos fueron los medicamentos más frecuentemente utilizados, seguidos de la adrenalina y los antihistamínicos. Conclusiones: El uso de adrenalina, pilar del tratamiento de anafilaxia, es subóptimo; con uso preferente de medicamentos de segunda línea como los corticosteroides. Se requieren protocolos para diagnóstico y tratamiento de anafilaxia, aunado a una educación continua del personal de salud.

Case Report: "Killer Bee" Swarm Attacks in French Guiana: The Importance of Prompt Care.

In French Guiana, a French overseas region partly located in the Amazon, "Africanized" bees, a hybrid species of Brazilian bees known as "killer bees," have been observed since 1975. Since then, several cases requiring long hospitalization times have been described, allowing for a better understanding of the physiopathological mechanisms of this particular envenomation. Here, we report on a series of 10 cases of patients simultaneously attacked by hundreds of killer bees and immediately treated by a prehospital medical team already on site. Between 75 and 650 stingers were removed per victim. The reference treatment for anaphylaxis using intramuscular injection of epinephrine, vascular filling, and oxygen therapy was administered to all patients without delay. A clinical description was provided, and biological tests were performed immediately after the envenomation. We therefore observe the existence of a two-phase, medically well-controlled systemic toxic reaction. Thus, all our patients left the hospital after 44 hours of monitoring with no complications or sequelae, despite levels of intoxication described as potentially fatal elsewhere in the literature.

Over-The-Scope Clip system as a first-line therapy for high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Effective hemostasis is essential to prevent rebleeding. We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the Over-The-Scope Clip (OTSC) system compared to combined therapy (through-the-scope clips with epinephrine injection) as a first-line endoscopic treatment for high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 95 patients from a single, tertiary center and underwent either OTSC (n = 46) or combined therapy (n = 49). The primary outcome of the present study was the efficacy of the OTSC system as a first-line therapy in patients with high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers compared to combined therapy with TTS clips and epinephrine injection. The secondary outcomes included the rebleeding rate, perforation rate, mean procedure time, reintervention rate, mean procedure cost and days of hospitalization in the two study groups within 30 days of the index procedure. RESULTS: All patients achieved hemostasis within the procedure; two patients in the OTSC group and four patients in the combined therapy group developed rebleeding (p = 0.444). No patients experienced gastrointestinal perforation. OTSC had a shorter median procedure time than combined therapy (11 min versus 20 min; p < 0.001). The procedure cost was superior for OTSC compared to combined therapy ($102,000 versus $101,000; p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the rebleeding prevention rate (95.6% versus 91.8%, p = 0.678), hospitalization days (3 days versus 4 days; p = 0.215), and hospitalization costs ($108,000 versus $240,000, p = 0.215) of the OTSC group compared to the combined therapy group. CONCLUSION: OTSC treatment is an effective and feasible first-line therapy for high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers. OTSC confers comparable costs and patient outcomes as combined treatments, with a shorter procedure time.

Successful oxaliplatin desensitization protocol in a patient with colorectal metastatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Platinum compounds are frequently used for the treatment of colorectal cancer as initial chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum used for the treatment of stage III colorectal cancer and is associated with hypersensitivity reactions. The incidence of hypersensitivity reaction is approximately 12%, with 1-2% of patients developing moderate to severe reactions. CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old male patient with stage III B colon cancer was diagnosed and chemotherapy with oxaliplatin was indicated by the oncology service. Within 20 min of the first cycle of oxaliplatin, he developed dyspnea, laryngeal spam, foreign body sensation in the throat, nausea, and diarrhea; therefore, the infusion of oxaliplatin was suspended, and intramuscular epinephrine was administered and intravenous hydrocortisone along with chlorpheniramine with adequate resolution of symptoms.Management and outcome: Intradermal skin test performed at the concentration of 5 mg/ml (dilution 1:100) was positive. Due to the symptoms presented we decided to perform desensitization to oxaliplatin (total dose: 250 mg) with three bags-12 steps protocol with an initial concentration dose of 1/100 of the total dose in a course of 5.56 h with no hypersensitivity reactions. DISCUSSION: Approximately 50% of patients who are exposed to oxaliplatin may have hypersensitivity despite premedication. Desensitization protocol induces tolerance to a drug temporarily and is dependent on continuous exposure.

Rapid desensitization to brentuximab vedotin after severe anaphylaxis in the treatment of refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Brentuximab vedotin is a monoclonal antibody drug conjugate used for the treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Hypersensitivity reactions to brentuximab vedotin may include cutaneous, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal and neurological signs and symptoms. CASE REPORT: We present the case of a 23-year-old Mexican female with stage IV progressive classical nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma who received multiple previous chemotherapy regimens. Brentuximab vedotin at 1.8 mg/kg (180 mg total dose), for 21-day cycles was indicated. Within 5 min of infusion of the 5th cycle of brentuximab, she developed severe anaphylaxis (hives, angioedema, diaphoresis, tachycardia, dyspnea, hypoxemia and loss of consciousness), which was successfully controlled with epinephrine, steroids and antihistamines.Management and outcome: Intradermal skin test at a concentration of 0.1 mg/ml was positive. Due to the severity of the symptoms and the lack of access to alternative treatments, we performed a desensitization protocol. A total of 180 mg of brentuximab was given in three bag solutions in 12 steps, with an initial concentration dose of 1/100 of the total dose in a course of 5.56 h with no hypersensitivity reactions. DISCUSSION: Severe anaphylaxis has been reported in 1.2% of patients receiving brentuximab vedotin. Patients who are treated by rapid drug desensitization with their first option therapy present a favorable survival rate with better cost-effectiveness in comparison to second-line treatment.

Anaphylaxis in children.

Anaphylaxis in children is a potential acute life-threatening systemic hypersensitivity reaction. Anaphylaxis fatality rate is estimated to be 0.65% to 2%. Food is the main anaphylaxis trigger in children, notably cow's milk, peanuts, and tree nuts. Mucocutaneous manifestations are observed in more than 90% of cases, but it is not essential for diagnosis. Deaths are rather secondary to the laryngeal edema, observed in 40%-50% of cases. Personal history of asthma, allergy to particular foods such as peanuts and tree nuts, and adolescence are known risk factors for anaphylaxis and more severe reactions. Epinephrine (adrenaline) is the medication of choice for the first-aid treatment of anaphylaxis. However, adrenaline auto-injectors (AAIs) are commercially available in only 32% of world countries. There are still considerable unmet needs in the field of anaphylaxis in children. Therefore, the Montpellier WHO Collaborating Centre aims to start the global action plan applied to anaphylaxis.

Reanimação cérebro-cardio-respiratória em pequenos animais: revisão de literatura / Brain-cardio-respiratory reanimation in small animals: literature review / Reanimación cerebral-cardio-respiratoria en pequeños animales: revision de literatura

A reanimação cérebro-cardio-respiratória na medicina veterinária é uma área que merece bastante estudo e aprimoramento, visto que, na rotina, cada profissional acaba tomando uma conduta diferente. Partindo deste fato, é importante estabelecer o correto diagnóstico da parada e utilizar o que existe de mais recente, se baseando em comprovações científicas, para conseguir o sucesso de sua reversão. O objetivo desta revisão foi compilar tudo o que vem sendo escrito e publicado de mais atual referente ao tema, em pequenos animais, no intuito de mostrar aos médicos veterinários atuantes na área clínica, mecanismos de realizar a melhor conduta possível mediante a parada cárdiorespiratória.(AU)

The brain-cardio-respiratory resuscitation in veterinary medicine is an area that deserves a lot of study and improvement, since in the routine, each professional ends up taking a different course. Starting from this fact, it is important to establish the correct diagnosis of the stop and to use what is of the most recent, based on scientific evidence, to achieve the success of its revertion. The objective of this review was to compile all that has been written and published of the most recent one referring to the subject, in small animals, in order to show to veterinarians working in the clinical area, the mechanisms to perform the best possible behavior through the cardiacarrest.(AU)

La reanimación cerebro-cardio-respiratoria en medicina veterinaria es un área que merece mucho estudio y mejora, ya que, en la rutina, cada profesional termina adoptando un enfoque diferente. En base a este hecho, es importante establecer el diagnóstico correcto de la detención y utilizar el más reciente, basado en evidencia científica, para lograr el éxito de su reversión. El propósito de esta revisión fue recopilar todo lo que se ha escrito y publicado sobre lo último en el tema, en animales pequeños, con el fin de mostrar a los veterinarios que trabajan en el área clínica, los mecanismos para llevar a cabo la mejor conducta posible a través del paro cardiopulmonar.(AU)

Acquired Angioedema due to C1 Inhibitor Deficiency Preceding Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Further Insights from Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (AAE-C1-INH) is a very rare disease. In clinical practice, it may be difficult to differentiate AAE-C1-INH from hereditary angioedema due to C1-INH deficiency (HAE-C1-INH). In both conditions, patients are at an increased risk of death from asphyxiation due to upper airway obstruction. The association of AAE-C1-INH with lymphoproliferative and autoimmune diseases, and with presence of anti-C1-INH antibodies has been well documented, and treatment of the underlying condition may result in complete remission of angioedema. OBJECTIVES: To discuss the clinical evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment outcomes of AAE-C1-INH in the context of the care of 2 patients with recurrent isolated angioedema. METHODS: Two patients were followed up prospectively at our clinic. Measurements of C3, C4, C1-INH, and C1q levels were carried out by nephelometry, and the functional activity of C1-INH was determined by a chromogenic assay. Hematological investigation included morphological and immunophenotyping analysis of peripheral blood, bone marrow, and spleen histopathology. Sequencing of the 8 exons and adjacent intronic regions of the SERPING1 gene was performed using the Sanger method. RESULTS: Two patients were diagnosed with AAE-C1-INH associated with splenic marginal zone lymphoma during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Close follow-up, including detailed clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests, of our patients with AAE-C1-INH was essential for the early diagnosis and successful treatment of the lymphoproliferative disease, leading to the resolution of the angioedema attacks.

Perfil de utilização de anestésicos locais de uma cidade brasileira com ênfase em diabéticos / Profile of use of local anesthetics in a Brazilian city with emphasis on diabetics

Objetivo: avaliar o conhecimento de cirurgiões-dentistas que trabalham em consultórios particulares de Palmas, Tocantins, quanto à utilização de anestésicos locais em pacientes portadores de diabetes mellitus. Materiais e método: trata-se de um estudo descritivo qualitativo, aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da FAMERP de São José do Rio Preto, sob o protocolo 032/2007 e CAAE: 0065.0.000.140-07, respeitando-se a Resolução 466/12, do Conselho Nacional de Saúde. A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio da aplicação de um questionário, utilizando um formulário estruturado. Resultados: de 113 participantes, 47 (41,6%) eram do sexo masculino e 66 (58,4%) do sexo feminino, com idade média de 35 anos. O anestésico mais utilizado pelos cirurgiões-dentistas avaliados foi a lidocaína 2% + adrenalina 1:100.000 (53,1%), o qual também é o mais utilizado para pacientes diabéticos controlados (64,6%). Quanto à variedade de anestésicos, 47,8% dos avaliados relataram possuir somente 3 tipos de anestésicos no consultório e que 83,2% nunca presenciaram nenhum problema decorrente do uso de anestésico. Além disso, 65,5% relataram não participar de cursos para atualização de conhecimentos, sendo que 53,1% mostraram-se insatisfeitos com o ensino de anestesiologia que receberam na graduação. Conclusão: observou-se que os cirurgiões-dentistas do atendimento odontológico particular de Palmas precisam de uma reciclagem profissional, a fim de atualizarem conhecimentos adquiridos na graduação sobre indicação e utilização de anestésicos locais em tratamentos odontológicos de pacientes com necessidades especiais, com ênfase em pacientes portadores de diabetes mellitus.(AU)

Objective: to evaluate the knowledge of dentists who work in private offices in Palmas, Tocantins, regarding the use of local anesthetics in patients with diabetes mellitus. Materials and method: this research is a qualitative descriptive study, approved by the Research Ethics Committee of FAMERP from São José do Rio Preto, under protocol number 032/2007 and CAAE: 0065.0.000.140-07 in compliance with the Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council. Data collection was performed through the application of a questionnaire, using a structured form. Results: 47 (41.6%) out of 113 participants were male and 66 (58.4%) female, with an average age of 35 years old. The anesthetic most used by the dentists evaluated was lidocaine 2% + adrenaline 1: 100,000 (53.1%) which is also the most used for controlled diabetic patients (64.6%). As for the variety of anesthetics, 47.8% of those evaluated reported having only 3 types of anesthetics in the office and that 83.2% never saw any problems resulting from the use of anesthetics. Furthermore, 65.5% reported not participating in courses to update knowledge and 53.1% were dissatisfied with the teaching of anesthesiology they received during graduation. Conclusion: it was observed that dentists who work in private dental offices in Palmas need a professional retraining in order to update knowledge acquired during graduation on the indication and use of local anesthetics in dental treatments for patients with special needs, with an emphasis on patients with diabetes mellitus.(AU)

Risk Factors for Severe Anaphylaxis in Children.

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with severe anaphylaxis in children. STUDY DESIGN: We carried out a multicenter prospective observational study including children less than 18 years old diagnosed with anaphylaxis in 7 Spanish pediatric emergency departments (EDs) between May 2016 and April 2018. Children were considered to have severe anaphylaxis if they met one or more of the following criteria: requirement for 2 or more doses of epinephrine, clinically important biphasic reaction, endotracheal intubation, intensive care unit admission, and/or death. RESULTS: We included 453 episodes of anaphylaxis. Of these, 61 were classified as severe anaphylaxis (13.5%, 95% CI [10.6-16.9]): 53 (11.7%) required more than 1 dose of epinephrine, and there were 14 (3.1%) cases of clinically important biphasic reactions, 2 (0.4%) intubations in the ED, and 6 (1.3%) admissions to the intensive care unit. No patients died. In the multivariable regression, we identified 5 independent risk factors for severe anaphylaxis: history of asthma (P = .002; OR 2.705, 95% CI [1.431-5.113]), onset of the symptoms less than 5 minutes after the allergen exposure (P = .002; OR 2.619, 95% CI [1.410-4.866]), non-well appearance (P = .005; OR 2.973, 95% CI [1.380-6.405]), tachycardia (P = .014; OR 2.339, 95% CI [1.191-4.959]), and hypotension (P = .036; OR 3.725, 95% CI [1.087-12.762]). CONCLUSIONS: Childhood anaphylaxis is usually well controlled in the ED. Children with a history of asthma, rapid onset of the symptoms, who are non-well appearing, or have tachycardia or hypotension upon arrival to the ED are more likely to have severe episodes.

Action Plan to Ensure Global Availability of Adrenaline Autoinjectors.

Adrenaline (epinephrine) is the first-line treatment for anaphylaxis and, therefore, is listed as an essential medication for the treatment of anaphylaxis by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, the availability of adrenaline autoinjectors (AAI) for use as first-aid treatment is limited to only 32% of all the world's 195 countries, most of which are high-income countries. The key issues leading to the lack of availability of AAIs include cost, national regulations, lack of regional evidence on the value of epinephrine, and limited accurate data about the epidemiology of anaphylaxis. For these reasons, regional and international allergy academies support initiatives to narrow these gaps. Our WHO Collaborating Centre is deeply involved in this process. This document aims to serve as a baseline to ensure the following: (1) adequate access to affordable autoinjectors for all patients/societies; and (2) the development of disease-/patient-specific approaches. Therefore, we propose a 5-step action plan that aims to gather accurate epidemiological data on anaphylaxis and autoinjector consumption, confirm partnerships, strengthen awareness, and include AAIs in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. These aspects should be considered in combination. A prioritized research agenda should encapsulate all these steps within the framework a global initiative against anaphylaxis. More than calling for universal availability of autoinjectors for optimal management of anaphylaxis, we propose an action plan as the baseline for a global initiative against anaphylaxis. We strongly believe that combined efforts will ensure a strong public health and societal approach that will lead to optimal care of allergic patients and best practices in allergology.