Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 12.197
Filter
1.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 32(16): e832-e838, 2024 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093461

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative fracture site infection can lead to notable patient morbidity, increase cost of care, and further contribute to healthcare disparities globally. Dogma suggests surgical blades as a vehicle for introducing bacteria into the surgical site; however, there is a paucity of literature to support this claim. This study uses advanced DNA sequencing to detect bacterial DNA on surgical blades used in upper extremity fracture surgeries. METHODS: This was a prospective study, conducted at a high-volume level 1 trauma center. All acute, closed upper extremity fractures requiring surgical stabilization were consecutively enrolled in a prospective fashion. The primary end point was the presence of bacterial DNA on the surgical blade using next-generation sequencing (NGS). At the time of surgery, two blades were sterilely opened. One blade served as the control while the other was used for the initial skin incision. Two negative control blades were opened directly into a sterile container. Two positive control blades were used for skin incision through known infections. All samples were sent for NGS analysis. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 33.5 years, and 30% were female; the median body mass index was 26.52. Humerus fractures were the most common injury (N = 17, 42.5%), followed by clavicle fractures (13, 32.5%) and radius/ulna fractures (10, 25.0%). NGS analysis revealed no contamination of test blades used for skin incision. Three control blades tested positive for bacterial DNA. Negative control blades tested negative for bacterial DNA (0/2); the positive control blades resulted positive for bacterial DNA contamination (2/2). CONCLUSION: Surgical blades used for skin incision in the upper extremity are not contaminated with bacterial DNA as analyzed by NGS. This finding challenges previous surgical dogma regarding surgical blade contamination and supports that the same surgical blade can safely be used for deeper dissection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II study: IRB approval-IRB#848938.


Subject(s)
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Prospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Fractures, Bone/surgery , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Young Adult , Upper Extremity/surgery , Upper Extremity/injuries , Equipment Contamination , Cohort Studies , Humeral Fractures/surgery
2.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom ; 38(19): e9869, 2024 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39049449

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Ethylene oxide (EO) sterilization is commonly employed for the sterilization of medical devices and has a very high market share. However, EO and its metabolite ethylene chlorohydrin (ECH) are toxic to humans. In compliance with the classification and residue limits of medical devices defined by ISO 10993-7, our study established two extraction methods for the testing of EO and ECH. METHODS: The first method involves simulated-use extraction using water as the extraction solvent. While the second, exhaustive extraction, directly extracts sample through headspace sampling analysis. Gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode was utilized, requiring only 16 min. Then, the developed method was applied to assess 10 commercially available medical devices sterilized by EO. RESULTS: In simulated-use extraction, calibration curves were evaluated in the range of 1-100 and 5-500 µg for EO and ECH, respectively (r > 0.999). Inter-day recoveries ranged from 85.0% to 95.2% and from 94.8% to 102.4%. In exhaustive extraction, calibration curves spanned 0.5-50 and 2-200 µg for EO and ECH, respectively (r > 0.999). Inter-day recoveries ranged from 101.6% to 102.1% for EO and from 98.1% to 102.2% for ECH. After analysis of the 10 commercially available medical devices, two cotton swabs were found to have ECH of 35.1 and 28.4 µg per device, and four medical devices were found to have EO with concentration below the limit of quantification. Meanwhile, we found that the EO internal standard (propylene oxide) recommended by ISO 10993-7 had interference problems with other similar substances and was not suitable as an internal standard for EO. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a sensitive and straightforward analytical approach to EO and ECH residues in a variety of medical devices. In addition, the results show that the EO or ECH content of these types of medical devices in our study falls below the regulatory limits, therefore instilling confidence among consumers regarding their safe use.


Subject(s)
Ethylene Oxide , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Ethylene Oxide/analysis , Ethylene Oxide/chemistry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Equipment and Supplies , Limit of Detection , Ethylenes/analysis , Ethylenes/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Equipment Contamination , Sterilization/methods
4.
J Hazard Mater ; 476: 135089, 2024 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959827

ABSTRACT

The surge in face mask use due to COVID-19 has raised concerns about micro(nano)plastics (MNPs) from masks. Herein, focusing on fabric structure and polymer composition, we investigated MNP generation characteristics, mechanisms, and potential risks of surgical polypropylene (PP) and fashionable polyurethane (PU) masks during their wearing and photoaging based on stereomicroscope, µ-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (µ-FTIR), and scanning electron microscope (SEM) techniques. Compared with new PP and PU masks (66 ± 16 MPs/PP-mask, 163 ± 83 MPs/PU-mask), single- and multiple-used masks exhibited remarkably increased MP type and abundance (600-1867 MPs/PP-mask, 607-2167 MPs/PU-mask). Disinfection exacerbated endogenous MP generation in masks, with washing (416 MPs/PP-mask, 30,708 MPs/PU-mask) being the most prominent compared to autoclaving (219 MPs/PP-mask, 553 MPs/PU-mask) and alcohol spray (162 MPs/PP-mask, 18,333 MPs/PU-mask). Photoaging led to massive generation of MPs (8.8 × 104-3.7 × 105 MPs/PP-layer, 1.0 × 105 MPs/PU-layer) and NPs (5.2 × 109-3.6 × 1013 NPs/PP-layer, 3.5 × 1012 NPs/PU-layer) from masks, presenting highly fabric structure-dependent aging modes as "fragmentation" for fine fiber-structure PP mask and "erosion" for 3D mesh-structure PU mask. The MNPs derived from PP/PU mask caused significant deformities of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae. These findings underscore the potential adverse effects of masks on humans and aquatic organisms, advocating to enhance proper use and rational disposal for masks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Masks , Polypropylenes , Polyurethanes , Textiles , Polypropylenes/chemistry , COVID-19/prevention & control , Polyurethanes/chemistry , Humans , Textiles/analysis , Animals , SARS-CoV-2 , Polymers/chemistry , Microplastics/toxicity , Zebrafish , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control
5.
Dent Med Probl ; 61(3): 391-399, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963395

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Mexico and around the world, water in dental units, including triple syringes, comes from municipal chlorinated water mains. The microbial contamination of dental unit water systems constitutes a risk factor for opportunistic infections. OBJECTIVES: The present work aimed to identify the bacteria present in the triple-syringe water lines of dental units at a dental school of a public university in Mexico, with a hypothesis that opportunistic bacteria of importance to human health would be found. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried-out. A total of 100 samples of triple-syringe tubing from dental units operated by a dental school of a public university in Mexico were analyzed before and after their use in dental practice. Bacterial biofilm was cultured and isolated from the tubing, using standard microbiological methods, and then the species present were identified through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The characterization of the biofilm was performed by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Bacterial growth was observed in 20% of the non-disinfected and 10% of the disinfected samples, with 11 strains isolated. Six genera and 11 bacterial species were genetically identified. Coagulasenegative staphylococci (CoNS), considered opportunistic human pathogens, were among the most critical microorganisms. Scanning electron microscopy revealed a thick polymeric matrix with multiple bacterial aggregates. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic bacteria from human skin and mucous membranes were detected. Under normal conditions, these bacteria are incapable of causing disease, but are potentially harmful to immunosuppressed patients.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Equipment Contamination , Syringes , Water Microbiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Mexico , Humans , Syringes/microbiology , Dental Equipment/microbiology , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Genotype , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
6.
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 55(3): 762-768, 2024 May 20.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38948302

ABSTRACT

Objective: Ultrasound diagnosis and treatment is easy to perform and takes little time. It is widely used in clinical practice thanks to its non-invasive, real-time, and dynamic characteristics. In the process of ultrasound diagnosis and treatment, the probe may come into contact with the skin, the mucous membranes, and even the sterile parts of the body. However, it is difficult to achieve effective real-time disinfection of the probes after use and the probes are often reused, leading to the possibility of the probes carrying multiple pathogenic bacteria. At present, the processing methods for probes at home and abroad mainly include probe cleaning, probe disinfection, and physical isolation (using probe covers or sheaths). Yet, each approach has its limitations and cannot completely prevent probe contamination and infections caused by ultrasound diagnosis and treatment. For example, when condoms are used as the probe sheath, the rate of condom breakage is relatively high. The cutting and fixing of cling film or freezer bags involves complicated procedures and is difficult to perform. Disposable plastic gloves are prone to falling off and causing contamination and are hence not in compliance with the principles of sterility. Furthermore, the imaging effect of disposable plastic gloves is poor. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore new materials to make probe covers that can not only wrap tightly around the ultrasound probe, but also help achieve effective protection and rapid reuse. Based on the concept of physical barriers, we developed in this study a heat sealing system for the rapid reuse of ultrasound probes. The system uses a heat sealing device to shrink the protective film so that it wraps tightly against the surface of the ultrasound probe, allowing for the rapid reuse of the probe while reducing the risk of nosocomial infections. The purpose of this study is to design a heat sealing system for the rapid reuse of ultrasound probes and to verify its application effect on the rapid reuse of ultrasound probes. Methods: 1) The heat sealing system for the rapid reuse of ultrasound probes was designed and tested by integrating medical and engineering methods. The system included a protective film (a multilayer co-extruded polyolefin thermal shrinkable film) and a heat sealing device, which included heating wire components, a blower, a photoelectric switch, temperature sensors, a control and drive circuit board, etc. According to the principle of thermal shrinkage, the ultrasound probe equipped with thermal shrinkable film was rapidly heated and the film would wrap closely around the ultrasound probe placed on the top of the heat sealing machine. The ultrasound probe was ready for use after the thermal shrinkage process finished. Temperature sensors were installed on the surface of the probe to test the thermal insulation performance of the system. The operation procedures of the system are as follows: placing the ultrasound probe covered with the protective film in a certain space above the protective air vent, which is detected by the photoelectric switch; the heating device heats the thermal shrinkable film with a constant flow of hot air at a set temperature value. Then, the probe is rotated so that the thermal shrinkable film will quickly wrap around the ultrasound probe. After the heat shrinking is completed, the probe can be used directly. 2) Using the convenience sampling method, 90 patients from the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were included as the research subjects. All patients were going to undergo arterial puncture under ultrasound guidance. The subjects were divided into 3 groups, with 30 patients in each group. Three measures commonly applied in clinical practice were used to process the probes in the three groups and water-soluble fluorescent labeling was applied around the puncture site before use. In the experimental group, the probes were processed with the heat sealing system. The standard operating procedures of the heat sealing system for rapid reuse of ultrasonic probes were performed to cover the ultrasonic probe and form a physical barrier to prevent probe contamination. There were two control groups. In control group 1, disinfection wipes containing double-chain quaternary ammonium salt were used to repeatedly wipe the surface of the probe for 10-15 times, and then the probe was ready for use once it dried up. In the control group 2, a disposable protective sheath was used to cover the front end of the probe and the handle end of the sheath was tied up with threads. Comparison of the water-soluble fluorescent labeling on the surface of the probe (which reflected the colony residues on the surface of the probe) before and after use and the reuse time (i.e., the lapse of time from the end of the first use to the beginning of the second use) were made between the experimental group and the two control groups. Results: 1) The temperature inside the ultrasound probe was below 40 ℃ and the heat sealing system for rapid reuse did not affect the performance of the ultrasound probe. 2) The reuse time in the heat sealing system group, as represented by (median [P25, P75]), was (8.00 [7.00, 10.00]) s, which was significantly lower than those of the disinfection wipe group at (95.50 [8.00, 214.00]) s and the protective sleeve group at (25.00 [8.00, 51.00]) s, with the differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). No fluorescence residue was found on the probe in either the heat sealing system group or the protective sheath group after use. The fluorescence residue in the heat sealing system group was significantly lower than that in the disinfection wipes group, showing statistically significant differences (χ 2=45.882, P<0.05). Conclusion: The thermal shrinkable film designed and developed in this study can be cut and trimmed according to the size of the equipment. When the film is heated, it shrinks and wraps tightly around the equipment, forming a sturdy protective layer. With the heat sealing system for rapid reuse of ultrasonic probes, we have realized the semi-automatic connection between the thermal shrinkable film and the heating device, reducing the amount of time-consuming and complicated manual operation. Furthermore, the average reuse time is shortened and the system is easy to use, which contributes to improvements in the reuse and operation efficiency of ultrasound probes. The heat sealing system reduces colony residues on the surface of the probe and forms an effective physical barrier on the probe. No probes were damaged in the study. The heat sealing system for rapid reuse of ultrasonic probes can be used as a new method to process the ultrasonic probes.


Subject(s)
Ultrasonography , Ultrasonography/instrumentation , Ultrasonography/methods , Hot Temperature , Equipment Reuse , Humans , Disinfection/methods , Disinfection/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control
7.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 24(4): 342-348, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38976900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enhancing the current breast pump sanitization method may improve maternal satisfaction and increase a mother's likelihood of providing human milk for their hospitalized infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Other than Centers for Disease Control (CDC) data, there is lack of studies on sanitization practices. Currently, the only option in the hospital setting for breast pump equipment cleaning is a steam sanitization plastic bag. PURPOSE: Using the Q. Basin will increase participant satisfaction compared to the steam sanitization bag. METHODS: A multi-phased pilot study was conducted in our quaternary care NICU to test the Q. Basin, a novel design developed to wash, dry, and safely steam sanitize breast pump equipment compared to the standard steam bag. A bacterial study was conducted on breast pump equipment from 10 mothers by swabbing the equipment immediately at hour zero and 24 hours. Twenty NICU mothers concurrently evaluated their satisfaction via a 3-question survey comparing the Q. Basin and the steam sanitization plastic bag method. RESULTS: The results showed a 20% increase in satisfaction with Q. Basin compared to the steam bag method. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Data analysis from the satisfaction survey concludes that mothers pumping preferred the Q. Basin as a quicker, faster, and more environmentally friendly method for breast pump part sanitization. Additional safety and materials studies are required before using the Q. Basin in the clinical environment.


Subject(s)
Breast Milk Expression , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Humans , Breast Milk Expression/instrumentation , Breast Milk Expression/methods , Pilot Projects , Infant, Newborn , Female , Disinfection/methods , Adult , Patient Satisfaction , Steam , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Mothers/psychology
8.
J Hosp Infect ; 150: 91-95, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830542

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Biofilm contributes significantly to bacterial persistence in endoscope channels. Enhanced cleaning methods capable of removing biofilm from all endoscope channels are required to decrease infection risk to patients. This head-to-head study compared cyclic build-up biofilm removal of an automated endoscope channel cleaner (AECC) with standard manual cleaning according to instructions for use (IFU) in polytetrafluorethylene channels. METHODS: Cyclic build-up biofilm was grown in 1.4-mm (representing air/water and auxiliary channels) and 3.7-mm (representing suction/ biopsy channels) inner diameter polytetrafluorethylene channels. All channels were tested for residual total organic carbon, protein, and viable bacteria. Internationally recognized ISO 15883-5:2021 alert levels were used as cleaning benchmarks for protein (3 µg/cm2) and total organic carbon (6 µg/cm2). RESULTS: The automated cleaner significantly outperformed manual cleaning for all markers assessed (protein, total organic carbon, viable bacteria) in 1.4-mm and 3.7-mm channels representing air/water/auxiliary and suction/biopsy channels, respectively. Manual cleaning failed to remove biofilm from the air/water and auxiliary channels. According to the IFU, these channels are not brushed, suggesting a potential root cause for a portion of the numerous endoscopy-associated infections reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: AECC shows potential to deliver enhanced cleaning over current practice to all endoscope channels and may thereby address infection risk.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Endoscopes , Biofilms/growth & development , Endoscopes/microbiology , Disinfection/methods , Decontamination/methods , Humans , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Bacteria/isolation & purification
9.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 57, 2024 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840171

ABSTRACT

AIM: Although uncommon, infections associated with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) may be responsible for severe life-threatening complications and increase healthcare costs. Few data are available on the relationship between PIVC insertion site and risk of infectious complications. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the CLEAN 3 database, a randomized 2 × 2 factorial study comparing two skin disinfection procedures (2% chlorhexidine-alcohol or 5% povidone iodine-alcohol) and two types of medical devices (innovative or standard) in 989 adults patients requiring PIVC insertion before admission to a medical ward. Insertion sites were grouped into five areas: hand, wrist, forearm, cubital fossa and upper arm. We evaluated the risk of risk of PIVC colonization (i.e., tip culture eluate in broth showing at least one microorganism in a concentration of at least 1000 Colony Forming Units per mL) and/or local infection (i.e., organisms growing from purulent discharge at PIVC insertion site with no evidence of associated bloodstream infection), and the risk of positive PIVC tip culture (i.e., PIVC-tip culture eluate in broth showing at least one microorganism regardless of its amount) using multivariate Cox models. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty three PIVCs with known insertion site and sent to the laboratory for quantitative culture were included. After adjustment for confounding factors, PIVC insertion at the cubital fossa or wrist was associated with increased risk of PIVC colonization and/or local infection (HR [95% CI], 1.64 [0.92-2.93] and 2.11 [1.08-4.13]) and of positive PIVC tip culture (HR [95% CI], 1.49 [1.02-2.18] and 1.59 [0.98-2.59]). CONCLUSION: PIVC insertion at the wrist or cubital fossa should be avoided whenever possible to reduce the risk of catheter colonization and/or local infection and of positive PIVC tip culture.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Peripheral , Humans , Female , Male , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Chlorhexidine , Adult , Disinfection/methods , Povidone-Iodine , Risk Factors , Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Equipment Contamination , Wrist/microbiology
10.
Indian J Dent Res ; 35(1): 80-83, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dental Unit Water Line (DUWL) deliver water to different handpieces in a dental unit. The water in DUWL circulates in a closed system, where it is taken from a container. The quality of dental water is of considerable importance since patients and dental staff are regularly exposed to water and aerosols generated from dental equipment. Output water from DUWLs may be a potential source of infection for both dental health care personnel and patients. AIM: To assess the microbial contamination in the DUWL among dental clinics in Chennai. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An in vitro study was conducted on 60 water samples from 20 dental clinics in Chennai in December 2019. Water samples were collected from three different sources of the Dental unit according to ADA guidelines. The collected samples were assessed for the presence of Aspergillus, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Legionella by agar plate method. The data were analysed using SPSS software version 20. RESULTS: Legionella was the most prevalent microorganism with 70% prevalence in a three-way syringe and 50% in scaler and airotor, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter with 10% prevalence in scaler and airotor and Aspergillus with a prevalence of 10% in the three-way syringe. CONCLUSION: Most of the dental units were contaminated with Aspergillus, Legionella, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter which pose a serious threat to the patients as well as the dentists.


Subject(s)
Dental Clinics , Dental Equipment , Equipment Contamination , Legionella , Water Microbiology , India , Dental Equipment/microbiology , Humans , Legionella/isolation & purification , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Acinetobacter/isolation & purification , In Vitro Techniques
11.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 155(6): 515-525.e1, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839239

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dental unit waterline (DWL) infection control is critical to infection prevention. Identifying challenges and barriers to its implementation is a first step toward understanding how to improve engagement. METHODS: A survey was distributed to dentists, dental hygienists, and dental assistants via the Qualtrics XM platform (Qualtrics). Responses were analyzed to quantify engagement in practices contrary to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance and identify avenues to improve engagement. RESULTS: Although oral health care providers recognized DWL infection control was important, there was a lack of clarity about appropriate routine engagement (eg, what lines should be tested), what should be noted in practice infection control records, and steps to be taken in response to a failed test result (ie, ≥ 500 colony-forming units/mL), such as taking a chair out of service. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results showed there were considerable gaps in knowledge and practice that could lead to patient harm. Oral health care provider training may not prepare personnel adequately to engage in, let alone supervise, DWL infection control. DWL infection control, like other aspects of infection control, requires action informed via an understanding of what needs to be done. Although good intentions are appreciated, better approaches to DWL infection control information dissemination and strategies to engage dental assistants, dental hygienists, and dentists in best practices are needed. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Evolving standards of care, including infection control, should be reflected in the provision of dental treatment. Improvements in communicating and ensuring engagement in best practices are needed when it comes to DWL infection control.


Subject(s)
Infection Control, Dental , Humans , Infection Control, Dental/methods , Dental Hygienists , Surveys and Questionnaires , Dentists , Dental Equipment , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Dental Assistants
12.
Clin Nurse Spec ; 38(4): 189-192, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889060

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has highlighted the strong association between healthcare-associated infections and the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes. This process improvement project provided an evidence-based workflow analysis of pleuravideoscope reprocessing to validate and implement safe practices in the pulmonary clinic and sterile processing department. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT/PROGRAM: A multidisciplinary team created an audit tool to complete infection control risk assessment using Lean Six Sigma methodology. OUTCOME: The risk assessment identified gaps in clinical practice, prompting corrective measures using a shared decision-making approach. The organization updated standard operating procedures, provided training and competency assessments, and purchased single-use pleuravideoscopes. These initiatives addressed the deficiencies and reinforced a culture of continuous process improvement and patient safety. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary teams should perform comprehensive reviews of facility processes and assess the risks related to infection control to identify optimal pleuravideoscope workflows for the healthcare institution. The involvement of a clinical nurse specialist is advantageous, as they possess the expertise necessary to facilitate collaborative efforts among team members spanning various departments. By leveraging the insights and skills of diverse professionals, healthcare organizations can optimize their reprocessing programs and enhance patient safety.


Subject(s)
Sterilization , Humans , Nurse Clinicians , Endoscopes/microbiology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Nursing Evaluation Research
13.
Anal Chem ; 96(21): 8373-8380, 2024 05 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709238

ABSTRACT

Polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes (MCTs) are increasingly used in lipidome sample preparation. In the absence of a comprehensive study evaluating ramifications of plasticware utilization in mass spectrometry-based lipidomic analyses, we conducted a systematic analysis to elucidate potential negative effects ascribable to labware contamination in serum lipidomics. During serum lipid extractions, tested glassware introduced 24 labware contaminants. In contrast, Eppendorf polypropylene MCTs contributed 485 contaminant features, many of which could be erroneously putatively identified as lipids via their m/z values. Eppendorf MCTs contamination engendered severe ion-suppression of 40 low abundance serum lipids, while generating mild to modest lipid ion-suppression across a multitude of higher abundance coeluting lipids. Less compatible polypropylene MCTs from an alternative manufacturer introduced a staggering 2,949 contaminant m/z values, severely affecting 75 coeluting serum lipids and causing more frequent and pronounced ion-suppression instances. Furthermore, by performing serum extractions with varied initial volumes, it was ascertained that labware-induced lipid ion-suppression is a dynamic phenomenon, contingent on both lipid and labware contaminant concentrations where low-abundance lipids are disproportionately impacted by coelutes of suppressive contaminants. In addition to lipid ion-suppression, the identification and quantification of 7 fatty acid endogenous serum lipids were compromised by the leaching of structurally identical surfactants from MCTs. MCTs artificially introduced 10 additional primary amides extraneous to serum samples. Utmost caution is imperative in interpreting data concerning primary amides and fatty acids when employing plastic labware. Through this investigation, we aspire to elevate awareness regarding the pernicious impact of labware contamination on lipidome analysis.


Subject(s)
Lipidomics , Lipids , Mass Spectrometry , Polypropylenes , Humans , Lipidomics/methods , Lipids/blood , Lipids/chemistry , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Polypropylenes/chemistry , Equipment Contamination
14.
Urology ; 189: 87-93, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692495

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of formalin disinfection of the needle tip in transrectal prostate biopsy (TRB) procedure to reduce infectious complications. The primary aim is to assess the impact of formalin on bacterial contamination of biopsy needle tips and its association with post-biopsy infective events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have employed a bacterial culture-based observational cohort design in this study. Two groups, formalin disinfection and non-formalin group, both underwent systematic 12-core TRB. In the formalin group, the biopsy needle tip was immersed in 10% formalin solution after each core, while in the non-formalin group, no formalin solution immersion was used. The primary outcomes include bacterial growth on biopsy needle tips and post-biopsy infective events. RESULTS: Formalin disinfection significantly reduced bacterial growth on needle tips (P <.001). The formalin group had no post-biopsy infections or sepsis, while the non-formalin group experienced a 7.5% infective event rate after TRB. CONCLUSION: Formalin disinfection of biopsy needle tip significantly reduces bacterial growth on biopsy needle and urinary tract infectious complications developed secondary to TRB. Further multicenter randomized controlled studies with larger cohorts are warranted to validate and establish formalin disinfection as a routine practice in TRB procedures.


Subject(s)
Disinfection , Formaldehyde , Humans , Formaldehyde/pharmacology , Male , Disinfection/methods , Prospective Studies , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Biopsy, Needle/instrumentation , Biopsy, Needle/adverse effects , Aged , Middle Aged , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Prostate/pathology , Prostate/microbiology , Needles/microbiology , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control
15.
Tomography ; 10(5): 686-692, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787013

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Bacterial contamination has been shown to occur during angiographies, although data on its frequency and relevance are sparse. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence of bacterial contamination of syringes used under sterile conditions during neuroangiographies. We sought to differentiate between contamination of the outside of the syringes and the inside and to detect the frequency, extent and germ spectrum of bacterial contamination. (2) Methods: We prospectively collected 600 samples from 100 neuroangiographies. Per angiography, fluid samples from the three routinely used syringes as well as the syringes themselves were analyzed. We analyzed the frequency and extent of contamination and determined the germ spectrum. (3) Results: The majority of samples (56.9%) were contaminated. There was no angiography that showed no contamination (0%). The outer surfaces of the syringes were contaminated significantly more frequently and to a higher extent than the inner surfaces. Both the frequency and extent of contamination of the samples increased with longer duration of angiographic procedures. Most of the bacterial species were environmental or skin germs (87.7%). (4) Conclusions: Bacterial contamination is a frequent finding during neuroangiographies, although its clinical significance is believed to be small. Bacterial contamination increases with longer duration of angiographic procedures.


Subject(s)
Equipment Contamination , Syringes , Syringes/microbiology , Humans , Prospective Studies , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Cerebral Angiography/methods , Radiography, Interventional/methods
16.
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf ; 23(3): e13348, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720587

ABSTRACT

Listeria monocytogenes biofilms formed on food-contact surfaces within food-processing facilities pose a significant challenge, serving as persistent sources of cross-contamination. In this review, we examined documented cases of foodborne outbreaks and recalls linked to L. monocytogenes contamination on equipment surfaces and in the food production environment, provided an overview of the prevalence and persistence of L. monocytogenes in different food-processing facilities, and discussed environmental factors influencing its biofilm formation. We further delved into antimicrobial interventions, such as chemical sanitizers, thermal treatments, biological control, physical treatment, and other approaches for controlling L. monocytogenes biofilms on food-contact surfaces. This review provides valuable insights into the persistent challenge of L. monocytogenes biofilms in food processing, offering a foundation for future research and practical strategies to enhance food safety.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Food Microbiology , Listeria monocytogenes , Listeria monocytogenes/physiology , Biofilms/growth & development , Food Handling/methods , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control
17.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 34(3): 248-258, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767568

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to determine whether bacteria contamination occurred within the surgical field or on endoscopic equipment during surgery using the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were recruited from patients planned for TOETVA between May 2017 and December 2019. Bacterial samples were taken before and at the conclusion of the TOETVA procedure. The preoperative and postoperative samples were taken from the endoscopic materials and inferior oral vestibulum using a sterile flocked swab. RESULTS: The study resulted in 480 samples (80 TOETVAs). No vestibular, port site, or neck infections occurred in any of the patients. Three (3.7%) out of 80 patients developed postoperative fever. Our results show different microbial communities during TOETVA. The most prevalent species detected were S treptococcus species. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the degree of contamination depended on the sampling site (inferior vestibulum > equipment) ( P =0.03). In addition, the abundance of bacteria was affected by operative time ( P =0.013). There were no significant differences observed in isolation frequencies of bacteria in malignancy ( P =0.34). CONCLUSIONS: TOETVA surgery is categorized as a "clean-contaminated" operation. A swab identified the common colonizers of oral microbiota on the endoscopic equipment and within the surgical field.


Subject(s)
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Thyroidectomy , Humans , Female , Male , Thyroidectomy/adverse effects , Thyroidectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/instrumentation , Adult , Equipment Contamination , Aged , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Mouth/microbiology , Bacteria/isolation & purification
18.
Surg Endosc ; 38(6): 3470-3477, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Soilage of the surgical endoscope occurs frequently during minimally invasive surgery. The resultant impairment of visualization of the surgical field compromises patient safety, prolongs operative times, and frustrates surgeons. The standard practice for cleaning the surgical camera involves a disruption in the conduct of surgery by completely removing the endoscope from the field, manually cleaning its lens, treating it with a surfactant, and reinserting it into the patient; after which the surgeon resumes the procedure. METHODS: We developed an automated solution for in vivo endoscope cleaning in minimally invasive surgery- a port that detects the position of the endoscope in its distal lumen, and precisely and automatically delivers a pressurized mist of cleaning solution to the lens of the camera. No additions to the scope and minimal user interaction with the port are required. We tested the efficacy of this troCarWash™ device in a porcine model of laparoscopy. Four board-certified general surgeons were instructed to soil and then clean the laparoscope using the device. Representative pre- and post-clean images were exported from the surgical video and clarity was graded (1) digitally by a canny edge detection algorithm, and (2) subjectively by 3 blinded, unbiased observers using a semi-quantitative scale. RESULTS: We observed statistically significant improvements in clarity by each method and for each surgeon, and we noted significant correlation between digital and subjective scores. CONCLUSION: Based on these data, we conclude that the troCarWash™ effectively restored impaired visualization in a large animal model of laparoscopy.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/instrumentation , Animals , Swine , Laparoscopes , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment Design
19.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 25(5): 384-391, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752928

ABSTRACT

Background: No in vitro surgical study has evaluated the time-dependent contamination of surgical suction tips compared with controls. Our purpose was to determine the difference in suction tip bacterial contamination rates between suction-positive and suction-negative tips. Materials and Methods: A matched-pair analysis of the contamination of surgical suction tips over a six-hour period was performed in two clean operating rooms. One suction tip was connected to standard wall suction (suction-positive group), with a matched control tip not connected to wall suction (suction-negative group). At time zero and then at hourly intervals for six hours, the distal 3 cm of suction tips were removed, placed in nutrient broth for 48 hours, then plate cultured. One hundred tips were collected for each time interval. Results: Eighty-two of 700 (11.7%) suction tips had bacterial contamination. Sixty-three (18.0%) of 350 suction-positive tips were contaminated, with 19 (5.4%) of the 350 suction-negative tips contaminated (χ2 = 26.7, p < 0.001). Suction tip contamination was time-dependent with the first significant difference between groups occurring after two hours of continuous suction (χ2 = 4.0, p = 0.04). Contamination rate in the suction-positive group increased significantly after one hour compared with time-zero controls (χ2 = 7.1, p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in frequency of positive cultures over time in the suction-negative group compared with time-zero controls. Conclusions: This is the first controlled laboratory study suggesting a time-dependent increase in positive suction tip cultures. From our data, operating room staff should have an awareness that suction tips represent a potential source of bacterial concentration. We recommend that when not in use, suction tip valves be closed if this feature is available, that hosing be manipulated to cease suction when not needed, that suckers be disconnected from tubing, or that suckers be exchanged at frequent intervals. Doing so may reduce bacterial contamination on the suction tip.


Subject(s)
Bacteria , Equipment Contamination , Operating Rooms , Suction/instrumentation , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Time Factors , Humans , Surgical Instruments/microbiology
20.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 417, 2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580933

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many instruments used in dentistry are rotary, such as handpieces, water syringes, and ultrasonic scalers that produce aerosols. The spray created by these instruments can carry, in addition to water, droplets of saliva, blood, and microorganisms, which can pose a risk of infections for healthcare professionals and patients. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this gained attention. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to carry out a systematic review of the evidence of the scope of the aerosol produced by ultrasonic scaler in environmental contamination and the influence of the use of intraoral suction reduction devices. DESIGN: Scientific literature was searched until June 19, 2021 in 6 databases: Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of science, Scopus, Virtual Health Library and Cochrane Library, without restrictions on language or publication date. Studies that evaluated the range of the aerosol produced by ultrasonic scaler during scaling/prophylaxis and the control of environmental contamination generated by it with the use of low (LVE) and high (HVE) volume evacuation systems were included. RESULTS: Of the 1893 potentially relevant articles, 5 of which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis of 3 RCTs showed that, even at different distances from the patient's oral cavity, there was a significant increase in airborne bacteria in the dental environment with the use of ultrasonic scaler. In contrast, when meta-analysis compared the use of HVE with LVE, there was no significant difference (P = 0.40/CI -0.71[-2.37, 0.95]) for aerosol produced in the environment. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increase in the concentration of bioaerosol in the dental environment during the use of ultrasonic scaler in scaling/prophylaxis, reaching up to 2 m away from the patient's mouth and the use of LVE, HVE or a combination of different devices, can be effective in reducing air contamination in the dental environment, with no important difference between different types of suction devices.


Subject(s)
Aerosols , COVID-19 , Dental Scaling , Equipment Contamination , Humans , Dental Scaling/instrumentation , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Air Microbiology , Dental Instruments , Ultrasonics/instrumentation , Suction/instrumentation , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL