Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.785
Filter
2.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 24(1): 374, 2024 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39187820

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ocular siderosis (OS) is a significant cause of visual loss due to retained ferrous intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB). Despite its rarity, OS can lead to severe visual impairment if not promptly diagnosed and treated. This case is notable due to the occult nature of the IOFB, which was undetected by standard imaging modalities, emphasizing the critical role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in such scenarios. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old Caucasian male presented with progressive vision loss in his right eye over 20 days. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/1000 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 9 mmHg in both eyes. Slit-lamp examination revealed a small linear corneal wound and an iris defect in the right eye, along with a cataract featuring brownish deposits on the anterior capsule. The left eye was normal. Fundus examination of the right eye was hindered by media opacities. Ultrasonography showed a flat retina and choroid with no detectable IOFB. Despite a strong clinical suspicion of OS, computed tomography (CT) did not detect any IOFB. MRI subsequently identified an artifact in the inferior sectors of the right eye, indicative of a metallic IOFB. Surgical intervention involved a 23-gauge vitrectomy, phacoemulsification, IOFB removal and silicon oil (SO) tamponade resulting in a fully restored VA of 20/20 and normal IOP one month post-operation. SO was removed 2 months later. The retina remained adherent with no PVR development, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans showed a normal macula. CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of considering OS in patients with unexplained vision loss and history of ocular trauma, even when initial imaging fails to detect an IOFB. MRI proved crucial in identifying the IOFB, highlighting its value in the diagnostic process. Early detection and surgical removal of IOFBs are essential to prevent irreversible visual damage. This case demonstrates that MRI should be employed when CT and ultrasonography are inconclusive, ensuring accurate diagnosis and timely intervention to preserve vision.


Subject(s)
Eye Foreign Bodies , Eye Injuries, Penetrating , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Siderosis , Humans , Eye Foreign Bodies/diagnosis , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/diagnosis , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery , Siderosis/diagnosis , Visual Acuity , Vitrectomy
5.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 142(7): e236428, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39023644

ABSTRACT

This case report describes a diagnosis of iridodialysis in an 11-year-old boy who presented with decreased vision and inflammation after direct blunt trauma to the left eye.


Subject(s)
Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , Male , Wounds, Gunshot/complications , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/diagnosis , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/etiology , Iris/injuries , Iris Diseases/etiology , Iris Diseases/diagnosis , Pupil Disorders/etiology , Pupil Disorders/diagnosis , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Eye Foreign Bodies/diagnosis
6.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 40(5): e154-e156, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776159

ABSTRACT

A 54-year-old female noticed a 2-month history of an enlarging left inferomedial orbital rim mass. The patient remembered a pencil injury at approximately 7 years of age. Her complete ophthalmic examination was otherwise unremarkable. She underwent CT orbital imaging, demonstrating a centrally hyperdense lesion along the left inferomedial orbital rim. There was no involvement of the nasolacrimal duct system. The patient underwent an excisional biopsy. The pathology disclosed noncaseating granulomatous inflammation to particulate black material consistent with graphite.


Subject(s)
Orbit , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Orbit/injuries , Orbit/diagnostic imaging , Eye Foreign Bodies/diagnosis , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Eye Foreign Bodies/etiology , Graphite , Biopsy , Orbital Diseases/etiology , Orbital Diseases/diagnosis , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/diagnosis , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/etiology
7.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital ; 44(4): 207-213, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712521

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Intraorbital foreign bodies (IOFBs) represent a clinical challenge: surgical management can be controversial and different strategies have been proposed. When removal is recommended, depending on the location and nature of the IOFB both external and endoscopic approaches have been proposed, with significantly different surgical corridors to the orbit and different morbidities. Methods: We performed a literature review of cases of IOFBs that received exclusive endoscopic transnasal surgical treatment to evaluate the role of this surgery in these occurrences. We also present a case of an intraorbital intraconal bullet that was successfully removed using an endoscopic transnasal approach with good outcomes in terms of ocular motility and visual acuity. Results: A limited number of cases of IOFBs have been treated with an exclusive endoscopic transnasal approach. When in the medial compartment, this approach appears to be safe and effective. In our case, two months after surgery the patient showed complete recovery with no significant long-term sequelae. Conclusions: When feasible, an endoscopic transnasal approach for intraorbital foreign bodies represents a valid surgical technique with optimal outcomes and satisfactory recovery.


Subject(s)
Nose , Orbit , Humans , Orbit/surgery , Orbit/injuries , Nose/surgery , Nose/injuries , Male , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery
8.
Int J Infect Dis ; 146: 107117, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801967

ABSTRACT

During outdoor work in April 2022, a 48-year-old man was stabbed by a tree branch and underwent intraocular foreign body extraction and repair of the scleral wound with sutures and amniotic membrane graft at a local hospital. Steroid therapy with prednisone was prescribed after a diagnosis of uveitis. Vitrectomy was performed in June 2023; a fungal culture was positive, and ITS sequencing identified the organism as Paradictyoarthrinium diffractum. Empiric antifungal therapy did not have an effect, and, because of deterioration of the condition, the left eye was enucleated in October 2023. P. diffractum is a mangrove host-specific saprophytic fungus that has not been reported in humans.


Subject(s)
Endophthalmitis , Eye Enucleation , Vitrectomy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Endophthalmitis/microbiology , Endophthalmitis/drug therapy , Endophthalmitis/diagnosis , Endophthalmitis/surgery , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Eye Foreign Bodies/complications , Eye Foreign Bodies/diagnosis , Eye Foreign Bodies/microbiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/microbiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/drug therapy , Eye Infections, Fungal/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Fungal/surgery , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use
10.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina ; 55(8): 434-442, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752917

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors regarding the visual and anatomic outcomes of eyes with posterior segment intraocular foreign body (PS-IOFB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 95 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and PS-IOFB removal between 2004 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on anatomical and visual outcomes, as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 31.9 ± 12.3 years. The mean follow-up time was 21.9 ± 28.3 months. The median time interval from trauma to IOFB removal was 9 days. In univariate analysis, there was a positive correlation between initial visual acuity (VA) and final VA (P < 0.001). A higher ocular trauma score (OTS) was significantly associated with both anatomical and functional success (P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis showed that OTS was not superior to initial VA in predicting final VA (r = 0.625 vs r = -0.601). Anatomic and functional outcomes were not affected by the injury site, nature of PS-IOFB, or timing of PS-IOFB removal (P > 0.05 for all). Subretinal IOFB location, the need for silicone oil tamponade, and endophthalmitis (P = 0.005, P < 0.001, P = 0.044, respectively) were risk factors for poor visual outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The initial VA, the extent of the initial ocular damage, and the presence of endophthalmitis are important prognostic factors for functional success. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:434-442.].


Subject(s)
Eye Foreign Bodies , Eye Injuries, Penetrating , Posterior Eye Segment , Tertiary Care Centers , Visual Acuity , Vitrectomy , Humans , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Eye Foreign Bodies/diagnosis , Eye Foreign Bodies/physiopathology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Visual Acuity/physiology , Vitrectomy/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Posterior Eye Segment/injuries , Posterior Eye Segment/surgery , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/diagnosis , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/physiopathology , Young Adult , Adolescent , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome , Child
11.
Injury ; 55(9): 111567, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664085

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Fishing stands out as a widely enjoyed leisure pursuit. While ocular fishing injuries are infrequent, they carry the potential for severe ocular trauma, and safe extraction of a fish hook can pose challenges. We here in report a series of 21 cases of penetrating injury to the cornea by fish hook, detailing successful surgical interventions employed for their management. The report not only outlines different techniques for the removal of fish hooks but also provides clarification on terminologies associated with various components of a fish hook. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at tertiary eye care centers in South India. Our hospitals cater to the states of Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, and Odisha. All medical records of patients who attended the emergency department from the period of 2003 to 2023 were evaluated and all patients with fish hook injury were included in the study. This is the longest and largest study in India. RESULTS: Twenty-one cases of ocular fish-hook injuries were presented to the emergency room between 2003 and 2023. Patients were between the ages of 9 and 59 years (mean, 29.4 years), and 90.4 % (19 out of 21) were males. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, surgical interventions, and visual outcomes were meticulously documented. Out of 21 cases, three cases (14.3 %) had blunt trauma, 17 cases (80.9 %) had penetrating injury and one case had lid laceration. Patients had better visual outcomes after the second surgery. Out of 21 cases, 7 (33.3 %) had post-operative visual acuity (VA) between 20/20 and 20/40. Three (14.3 %) had post-operative VA between 20/60 and 20/125. Five (23.8 %) had post-operative VA between 20/200 and 20/600. Six cases (28.6 %) had poor visual outcomes of which two had no perception of light (NPL), two had Hand movements and the other two had the perception of light present and projection of rays inaccurate CONCLUSION: This extensive case series underscores the complexity of ocular injuries caused by fish hooks and emphasizes significance of tailored surgical approaches for optimal visual outcomes. The hook can be successfully removed with minimal trauma to ocular structures by understanding structure of fish hook and by employing appropriate method of extraction.


Subject(s)
Eye Foreign Bodies , Eye Injuries, Penetrating , Visual Acuity , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Retrospective Studies , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery , Middle Aged , India/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Young Adult , Treatment Outcome , Corneal Injuries/surgery , Emergency Service, Hospital
12.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 47(6): 104188, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636198

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Open globe injuries are a major cause of visual impairment in children, related to the severity of the trauma or secondary to induced amblyopia. Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFB) have been reported in approximately one third of cases of open globe injuries. As clinical presentation and management may differ between adults and children, data is lacking about IOFBs in children under 18years of age. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics and visual prognosis of ocular trauma associated with intraocular foreign bodies in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients under 18years of age treated for ocular trauma with IOFB. Demographic characteristics, complete initial and final ophthalmological examination, imaging data and details of medical and surgical management were collected. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included (78.6% boys), with a mean age of 10.3years (min 7months-max 17years). In 92.9% of cases, patients were found to have a single IOFB, mostly metallic (71.4%). Posterior segment IOFBs were found in 50% of cases, anterior segment IOFBs in 28.6% and orbital IOFBs in 21.4%. The clinical examination permitted detection of the IOFBs in 50% of cases, while they were visible on CT scan in all cases. The mean initial visual acuity was 20/320, and the mean final visual acuity was 20/125. Endophthalmitis occurred in 2 cases (14%). DISCUSSION: Open globe injuries associated with IOFB are severe and sight-threatening. Localization of the IOFB in the posterior segment has a worse prognosis. CT scan is mandatory, especially in children, as the trauma history is often missing. Retinal detachment and endophthalmitis appear to be the main prognostic factors requiring urgent specialized pediatric ophthalmology management.


Subject(s)
Eye Foreign Bodies , Eye Injuries, Penetrating , Humans , Eye Foreign Bodies/diagnosis , Eye Foreign Bodies/epidemiology , Eye Foreign Bodies/complications , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Male , Child , Female , Child, Preschool , Infant , Adolescent , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/diagnosis , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/epidemiology , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/complications , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery , Visual Acuity , Prognosis
13.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 47(7): 104190, 2024 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669863

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Removal of orbital foreign bodies is a surgical challenge. The purpose of this study is to report our experience in the removal of orbital foreign bodies and to evaluate the usefulness of various technological aids in their removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study at Nice University Hospital (France) from January 2017 to December 2023. All patients undergoing surgery for an orbital foreign body during the study period were included. Data recorded included the nature of the orbital foreign body, its size, location, surgical route, outcome (success, partial success, failure), and technological aids used (intraoperative navigation, intraoperative imaging scope, orbital magnet). Concurrently, we designed a dedicated orbital magnet, which was tested in the anatomy laboratory and in two of our patients. RESULTS: Six patients, all young men, were included during the study period. Removal was successful, partially successful, or unsuccessful in one-third of cases, respectively. Failure was associated with orbital foreign bodies located in the intraconal or posterior orbital space. Preoperatively, the use of a "low-artifact" scanner allowed us to better determine the exact size and shape of the orbital foreign body. Intraoperative navigation was not accurate enough, due to the mobility of the orbital bodies within the orbital fat. In our experience, intraoperative scope imaging was more accurate. The use of a dedicated orbital magnet was successfully tested in the anatomy laboratory and allowed the removal of a small orbital foreign body in one of our patients. Intraoperative surgical videos are provided. CONCLUSION: Vegetal orbital foreign bodies must be systematically removed. Removal of non-vegetal orbital foreign bodies should be considered on a case-by-case basis based on their size, best assessed using a "low artifact" scanner, their location, and their intrinsic ferromagnetism. Intraoperative navigation does not appear useful, while intraoperative scope imaging does. A dedicated orbital magnet might be helpful in removing ferromagnetic orbital foreign bodies. However, an orbital magnet may be ineffective in removing intraorbital bullets, since they are made primarily of an alloy of copper and lead.


Subject(s)
Eye Foreign Bodies , Orbit , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Eye Foreign Bodies/diagnosis , Adult , Orbit/surgery , Orbit/injuries , Orbit/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Adolescent , Magnets , Treatment Outcome
14.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) ; 99(6): 256-259, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521347

ABSTRACT

A 54-year-old man presented to the ophthalmic emergency department of our center with eye pain and blurred vision in his right eye following a workplace accident. Examination revealed a penetrating corneal injury with the presence of an intraocular foreign body (IOFB) involving the corneoscleral limbus, perforating the cornea, iris, anterior lens capsule, and lens. Immediate surgical intervention was carried out with the extraction of the IOFB, identified as an 8mm mussel shell fragment, and the removal of the resulting traumatic cataract. Both preoperative and postoperative examinations showed an attached retina with no signs of retinal tears or vitreous hemorrhage. Appropriate management in this case, along with the timely identification of the agent, led to favorable outcomes despite the size of the intraocular foreign body.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational , Eye Foreign Bodies , Eye Injuries, Penetrating , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/etiology
16.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 24(1): 80, 2024 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383362

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and efficiency of self-assembled intraocular rare earth magnet and forceps in removing intraocular foreign bodies(IOFBs) undergoing 25-gauge(G) pars plana vitrectomy. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with metallic IOFB underwent 25-G PPV were enrolled into this study. Self-assembled intraocular rare earth magnet were used in 15 patients(bar group), and forceps were used in 15 patients(forceps group). Success rate of removing IOFB, time taken to remove IOFB, incidence of IOFB slippage and fall, iatrogenic retinal damages were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in success rate of removing IOFBs between the groups(93.3% and 100%, P > 0.99). The median time taken of removing FB was significantly shorter in bar group than in forceps group(112 and 295 s, P = 0.001). None of the patients in bar group had IOFB slippage and fall, or related iatrogenic retinal damage in the process of removal. In forceps group, IOFB slippage and fall during removal were observed in 7 of 15(47.6%) patients, related iatrogenic retinal injuries were recorded in 6 of 15(40.0%) patients, both were significantly higher than bar group(P = 0.003 and P = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with forceps, the assembled intraocular magnet can greatly reduce the possibility of IOFB slippage and fall, prevent related iatrogenic retinal damage, and shorten the time taken to remove IOFB. The assembled intraocular magnet can be an useful tool in removing metallic IOFBs in PPV.


Subject(s)
Eye Foreign Bodies , Eye Injuries, Penetrating , Retinal Diseases , Humans , Vitrectomy , Magnets , Retrospective Studies , Eye Foreign Bodies/etiology , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Surgical Instruments , Retinal Diseases/surgery , Iatrogenic Disease , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/etiology , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery
17.
Retina ; 44(6): 1107-1110, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38176001

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The intraocular lens blocking technique described for the removal of intraocular foreign bodies emerged as a result of an effort to prevent the foreign body from being retracted into the posterior segment because of the resistance encountered while removing it from the corneal incision. However, in the technique described, in addition to the difficulty of the surgical procedure, the new concern is to create a posterior capsulorhexis according to the size of the foreign body and to pass the foreign body through the capsulorhexis. METHODS: Here, the authors describe a new approach to the intraocular lens blocking technique. In this approach, the intraocular foreign body, which is held with intraocular forceps without any opening in the posterior capsule, is held in a perpendicular position to the long axis, lifted directly into the anterior chamber, and safely removed from the front of the monoblock foldable intraocular lens. RESULTS: In all patients treated with this approach, IOFBs were successfully removed without intraoperative or postoperative complications, and postoperative intraocular lens centralization was achieved in all patients. CONCLUSION: This approach may provide practicality to the intraocular lens blocking technique.


Subject(s)
Capsulorhexis , Eye Foreign Bodies , Lenses, Intraocular , Humans , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Eye Foreign Bodies/diagnosis , Capsulorhexis/methods , Male , Female , Adult , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery , Middle Aged , Young Adult
18.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 39(2): 139-142, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38069614

ABSTRACT

The standard of care for open globe injuries is prompt surgical closure, as delay in repair is a reported risk factor for post-traumatic endophthalmitis and is associated with worse visual outcomes. This article serves as a review of the current management and outcomes of open globe injuries repaired greater than 24 hours from the time of injury, specifically evaluating the rates of endophthalmitis in cases with and without intraocular foreign bodies, visual outcomes and rates of primary enucleation or evisceration.


Subject(s)
Endophthalmitis , Eye Foreign Bodies , Eye Injuries, Penetrating , Humans , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/surgery , Eye Injuries, Penetrating/complications , Visual Acuity , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Endophthalmitis/etiology , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies
20.
Med Phys ; 51(4): 3124-3129, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38055556

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ocular foreign bodies (OFBs) are a relatively common occurrence in ocular injuries, and a severe risk factor for vision disorders. They are notoriously challenging to identify and localize precisely to allow surgical removal, even with the most recent technological advancements. PURPOSE: To compare the efficiency of different imaging methods in detecting and localizing OFBs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients with OFBs, detected by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and confirmed during surgery. Patients who presented to our medical center between January 2016 and January 2022 and also underwent computed tomography (CT), X ray, and/or ocular B-scan ultrasonography (B-scans) were selected. RESULTS: This study included 134 patients with a history of ocular trauma and OFBs (mean age: 47.25 years, range: 8-78). The mean time interval from injury to UBM examination was 36.31 months (range: 0.2-120 months). Most OFBs were metallic (51.82%) or plant-based (25.37%); 22.39% of them were located in the sclera, 26.87% in the anterior chamber, and 23.88% in the ciliary body and iris. OFBs ranged in size from 0.10 to 6.67 mm (mean: 1.15 ± 1.10 mm). B-scans identified OFBs in 37 of the 119 patients examined (31.09%); CT in 52 of 84 patients (61.90%); and radiography in 29 of 50 patients (58.00%). Univariate and multivariate analyses determined that both CT and radiography showed low detection rates for plant-based versus non-plant-based OFBs (CT: p < 0.001; radiography: p = 0.007), small particles (<1.00 mm vs. >1.00 mm; CT: p = 0.001, radiography: p = 0.024), and with eyeball wall locations (vs. intraocular; CT: p < 0.001, radiography: p = 0.021). Similarly, B-scans were less efficient for plant-based and eyeball wall-located OFBs (both p = 0.001), whereas the difference based on dimensions was not significant (p = 0.118). CONCLUSIONS: CT, radiography, and B-scans showed lower detection rates for plant-based, small, and eyeball wall-located OFBs. Our findings strongly suggest that UBM could be a more adequate imaging modality when such OFBs are suspected.


Subject(s)
Eye Foreign Bodies , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Eye Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Eye Foreign Bodies/etiology , Eye Foreign Bodies/surgery , Microscopy, Acoustic , Ultrasonography , Radiography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL