Evaluating the web as a source of information for patients with chest wall deformities: insights into engagement and disparities.

BACKGROUND: Recent data highlight the internet's pivotal role as the primary information source for patients. In this study, we emulate a patient's/caregiver's quest for online information concerning chest deformities and assess the quality of available information. METHODS: We conducted an internet search using combination of the terms "pectus excavatum," "pectus excavatum surgery," "funnel chest," "pectus excavatum repair" and identified the first 100 relevant websites from the three most popular search engines: Google, Yahoo, and Bing. These websites were evaluated using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) instrument. RESULTS: Of the 300 websites generated, 140 (46.7%) were included in our evaluation after elimination of duplicates, non-English websites, and those targeting medical professionals. The EQIP scores in the final sample ranged from 8 to 32/36, with a median score of 22. Most of the evaluated websites (32.8%) originated from hospitals, yet none met all 36 EQIP criteria. DISCUSSION: None of the evaluated websites pertaining to pectus excavatum achieved a flawless "content quality" score. The diverse array of websites potentially complicates patients' efforts to navigate toward high-quality resources. Barriers in accessing high-quality online patient information may contribute to disparities in referral, patient engagement, treatment satisfaction, and overall quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

New Computerized Planning Algorithm and Clinical Testing of Optimized Nuss Bar Design for Patients with Pectus Excavatum.

BACKGROUND Computer-aided design (CAD) has been used in the Nuss procedure to determine the bar length and shape. Despite computer aid, the shape and design remain quite intuitive. We tested a new algorithm to determine the optimal bar shape. MATERIAL AND METHODS The normal sterno-vertebral distance was defined on computed tomography (CT) scans of patients without pectus excavatum (PEx) at the same level where the deepest depression was found on CT scans of 97 patients with PEx. Four points were marked on the CT scan of 60 patients with PEx at the deepest deformity: P1: edge of the vertebra; P2: edge of the deformity; P3: the expected contact point of the bar and the rib; and P4: the expected end of the bar. The algorithm generated 3 circles upon these points, and the fusion of the arcs drew the line of the ideal bar. Corrected and normal sterno-vertebral distance values were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Ten bars were bent manually guided by a 1: 1 printout of the designed bar and were implanted in 10 adolescents. RESULTS The shortest sterno-vertebral distance was 3 cm below the intermammillary line in PEx patients. The normal mean sterno-vertebral distance at this level was 10.16±1.35 cm in non-PEx patients. The mean virtually corrected sterno-vertebral distance was 10.28±1.27 cm. No significant difference was found (P=0.44). The bars were seamless and were successfully implanted. No bar needed adjustment, the operation time was shorter, and the patient satisfaction score was 9.4/10. CONCLUSIONS With our new algorithm, an optimal Nuss bar can be designed.

Scapula alata, a rare complication after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

A male patient in his early 30s underwent minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. According to standard Nuss bar procedure, a 30-degree thoracoscope was introduced through a right midaxillary 10 mm trocar in the 4th intercostal space. Two bars and five stabilisers were placed in a retromuscular position. After discharge, the patient experienced right upper back pain requiring prolonged opioid usage for three months and right scapular winging limiting functional activities. After conservative treatment with physiotherapy for 11 months, the patient still suffered from residual scapula alata with pain and muscle weakness. On suspicion of long thoracic nerve neuropraxia related to the thoracoscope placement, an electromyogram was conducted 16 months following surgery, revealing mild polyphasic potentials of the serratus anterior muscle without abnormal muscle unit action potential. After extended conservative therapy for another year, physical examination 28 months after surgery showed almost complete resolution of scapular winging.

A minimally invasive hybrid procedure to correct pectus arcuatum.

BACKGROUND: Pectus arcuatum, also known as horns of steer anomaly or Currarino-Silverman Syndrome, is a distinct chest wall anomaly characterized by severe manubriosternal angulation, a shortened sternum, and mild pectus excavatum. The anomaly is typically repaired using open techniques, employing orthopedic fixation devices. Here, we report the results of a minimally invasive hybrid procedure to repair pectus arcuatum. METHODS: The procedure combines a standard Nuss procedure to correct the depressed sternum with a short upper chest (in boys) or inter-mammary (in girls) incision for bilateral subperichondrial resection of the upper costal cartilages, osteotomy, and correction of the manubrial angulation. The medical records of all patients who underwent the procedure over the last 10 years were reviewed. RESULTS: Five patients, 3 boys and 2 girls, aged 14 to 17 years, underwent the procedure. Three patients had their pectus bars removed 3-4 years after repair. Follow-up after correction ranged from 6 months to 7 years. Good correction resulted in all patients achieving recovery without complications and recurrence. To date, all patients have been satisfied with their results. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive hybrid procedure adequately corrects pectus arcuatum with minimal scarring and high satisfaction.

ADVANCES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR PECTUS EXCAVATUM: ENHANCING OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE.

Pectus excavatum, also called sunken chest, is the most common deformation of the sternum (90%). The deformation is caused by the depression of the sternum and costal cartilages, which causes reduction of the chest cavity and dysfunction of cardio-pulmonary systems in it. Sunken chest is more common in males than females, prevalence is 5/1. Most of the cases appear in the first year of life, however severity of the pathology is formed during puberty. Etiopathogenesis, genetic factors, and associated diseases of Pectus Excavatum are various and are still the subject of study. The manifestation of the disease is determined by the degree of chest deformation, which is calculated using the "Haller index". Providing that a high degree of deformation can lead to pathological functioning of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. The treatment of this condition is an urgent, complex, and developing issue. The main method of treatment for sunken chest is surgical intervention; However, in cases of mild degrees of the mentioned deformation, different approaches are used. Our goal is to discuss contrasting treatment techniques and present our improved repairing technique for sunken chest, which is performed in Georgia.

(F)utility of preoperative pulmonary function testing in pectus excavatum to assess severity.

PURPOSE: The utility of pulmonary function testing (PFT) in pectus excavatum (PE) has been subject to debate. Although some evidence shows improvement from preoperative to postoperative values, the clinical significance is uncertain. A high failure-to-completion rate for operative PFT (48%) was identified in our large institutional cohort. With such a high non-completion rate, we questioned the overall utility of PFT in the preoperative assessment of PE and sought to evaluate if other measures of PE severity or cardiopulmonary function could explain this finding. METHODS: Demographics, clinical findings, and results from cardiac MRI, PFT (spirometry and plethysmography), and cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) were reviewed in 270 patients with PE evaluated preoperatively between 2015 and 2018. Regression modeling was used to measure associations between PFT completion and cardiopulmonary function. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographics, symptoms, connective tissue disorders, or multiple indices of pectus severity and cardiac deformation in PFT completers versus non-completers. While regression analysis revealed higher RVEF, LVEF, and LVEF-Z scores, lower RV-ESV/BSA, LV-ESV/BSA, and LV-ESV/BSA-Z scores, and abnormal breathing reserve in PFT completers vs. non-completers, these findings were not consistent across continuous and binary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PFT completers were not significantly different from non-completers in most structural and functional measures of pectus deformity and cardiopulmonary function. Inability to complete PFT is not an indicator of pectus severity.

Complications after Nuss bar removal procedure for pectus excavatum. Analysis and proposal of a safety protocol. / Complicaciones tras retirada de barra de Nuss en pectus excavatum. Análisis y propuesta de un protocolo de seguridad.

OBJECTIVE: The Nuss bar removal procedure may bring about different complications. Some are mild while others can be life-threatening. An adequate surgery setup and the fulfilment of some security steps may reduce their incidence. This study aims to analyze our experience with the complications that occurred during bar removal and our safety protocol for the prevention and management of these complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational cohort study from a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent Nuss bar removal from November 2013 to March 2022 at a University hospital. Variables analyzed include patients' demographics; presence of comorbidities; time elapsed from bar placement to removal, and the occurrence of operative and postoperative complications. Study written under the 'PROCESS Guideline'. RESULTS: Fourty (40) patients were included in the study; 37 were male. One bar was removed in 17 patients and two in 22 patients. Median age at surgery: 17.5 years (Percentile 25-75%: 16.75-19.25). Time elapsed from placement to removal: 26 months (Percentile 25-75%: 23.75-30.25). Complications: 10 in 9 patients (22.5%); 6 Clavien-Dindo class I (67%); 2 class II (22%); 1 class IIIb, 1 class IV. The hemorrhagic complication motivated the development of a safety protocol to reduce incidence of complications. CONCLUSION: Nuss bar removal is a safe procedure with usually scant complications. Nonetheless, these may be serious sometimes. To prevent them, a protocol for a safe procedure is important.

OBJETIVO: La retirada de la barra de Nuss puede provocar diversas complicaciones, algunas leves y otras potencialmente mortales. Su incidencia puede verse reducida con una preparación quirúrgica adecuada y siguiendo ciertos pasos de seguridad. El presente estudio tiene por objeto analizar nuestra experiencia con las complicaciones acontecidas durante la retirada de la barra, así como nuestro protocolo de seguridad para la prevención y el manejo de dichas complicaciones. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio de cohortes observacional llevado a cabo a partir del análisis retrospectivo de todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de retirada de barra de Nuss entre noviembre de 2013 y marzo de 2022 en un hospital universitario. Se analizaron las siguientes variables: demografía de los pacientes, presencia de comorbilidades, tiempo desde la colocación de la barra hasta su retirada, y complicaciones operatorias y postoperatorias. El estudio se realizó conforme a las directrices de la PROCESS Guideline. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 40 pacientes, 37 de ellos varones. En 17 pacientes se retiró una barra, y en 22, dos. La edad media en el momento de la cirugía fue de 17,5 años (percentil 25-75%: 16,75 - 19,25). El tiempo transcurrido desde la colocación hasta la retirada fue de 26 meses (percentil 25-75%: 23,75 - 30,25). Se registraron 10 complicaciones en 9 pacientes (22,5%), 6 de clase I según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo (67%), 2 de clase II (22%), 1 de clase IIIb y 1 de clase IV. La complicación hemorrágica motivó la creación de un protocolo de seguridad para disminuir la incidencia de las complicaciones. CONCLUSION: La retirada de la barra de Nuss es un procedimiento seguro, habitualmente con escasas complicaciones, aunque en ocasiones pueden ser graves. Para evitarlas, es importante contar con un protocolo que garantice la seguridad.

A Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Pectus Excavatum Repair Surgery with a Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Technique: Case Report.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is currently used for the repair of pectus excavatum. Analgesia after thoracic surgery can be provided with nerve blocks, intravenous drugs, or neuraxial techniques. Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) is a novel interfascial plane block and it is performed between the serratus posterior superior muscle and the intercostal muscles at the level of the second and third ribs. In this case, we present our successful analgesic experience with SPSIPB in a patient who underwent minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair with a VATS technique.

Complicaciones tras retirada de barra de Nussen pectus excavatum. Análisis y propuesta de unprotocolo de seguridad / Complications after Nuss bar removal procedure for pectus excavatum. Analysis and proposal of a safety protocol

Objetivo: La retirada de la barra de Nuss puede provocar diversascomplicaciones, algunas leves y otras potencialmente mortales. Su incidencia puede verse reducida con una preparación quirúrgica adecuaday siguiendo ciertos pasos de seguridad. El presente estudio tiene porobjeto analizar nuestra experiencia con las complicaciones acontecidasdurante la retirada de la barra, así como nuestro protocolo de seguridadpara la prevención y el manejo de dichas complicaciones.Material y métodos:Estudio de cohortes observacional llevado acabo a partir del análisis retrospectivo de todos los pacientes sometidos acirugía de retirada de barra de Nuss entre noviembre de 2013 y marzo de2022 en un hospital universitario. Se analizaron las siguientes variables:demografía de los pacientes, presencia de comorbilidades, tiempo desdela colocación de la barra hasta su retirada, y complicaciones operatoriasy postoperatorias. El estudio se realizó conforme a las directrices de laPROCESS Guideline. Resultados: Se incluyó a 40 pacientes, 37 de ellos varones. En 17pacientes se retiró una barra, y en 22, dos. La edad media en el momento de la cirugía fue de 17,5 años (percentil 25-75%: 16,75 - 19,25).El tiempo transcurrido desde la colocación hasta la retirada fue de 26meses (percentil 25-75%: 23,75 - 30,25). Se registraron 10 complicaciones en 9 pacientes (22,5%), 6 de clase I según la clasificación deClavien-Dindo (67%), 2 de clase II (22%), 1 de clase IIIb y 1 de claseIV. La complicación hemorrágica motivó la creación de un protocolo deseguridad para disminuir la incidencia de las complicaciones. Conclusión: La retirada de la barra de Nuss es un procedimientoseguro, habitualmente con escasas complicaciones, aunque en ocasionespueden ser graves. Para evitarlas, es importante contar con un protocoloque garantice la seguridad.(AU)

Objective: The Nuss bar removal procedure may bring about different complications. Some are mild while others can be life-threatening.An adequate surgery setup and the fulfilment of some security stepsmay reduce their incidence. This study aims to analyze our experiencewith the complications that occurred during bar removal and our safetyprotocol for the prevention and management of these complications.Materials and methods: Observational cohort study from a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent Nuss bar removalfrom November 2013 to March 2022 at a University hospital. Variablesanalyzed include patients’ demographics; presence of comorbidities;time elapsed from bar placement to removal, and the occurrence ofoperative and postoperative complications. Study written under the´PROCESS Guideline’. Results: Fourty (40) patients were included in the study; 37 weremale. One bar was removed in 17 patients and two in 22 patients. Medianage at surgery: 17.5 years (Percentile 25-75%: 16.75 - 19.25). Timeelapsed from placement to removal: 26 months (Percentile 25 - 75%:23.75 - 30.25). Complications: 10 in 9 patients (22.5%); 6 Clavien-Dindoclass I (67%); 2 class II (22%); 1 class IIIb, 1 class IV. The hemorrhagiccomplication motivated the development of a safety protocol to reduceincidence of complications. Conclusion: Nuss bar removal is a safe procedure with usuallyscant complications. Nonetheless, these may be serious sometimes. Toprevent them, a protocol for a safe procedure is important.(AU)

A preliminary study on the normal values of the thoracic Haller index in children.

OBJECTIVES: The Haller index (HI) is widely utilized as a quantitative indicator to assess the extent of the pectus excavatum (PE) deformity, which is the most common chest wall abnormality in children. Both preoperative correction planning and postoperative follow-up need to be based on the standard of normal thoracic growth and development. However, there is currently no established reference range for the HI in children. Consequently, the goal of this study was to conduct a preliminary investigation of normal HI values among children to understand thoracic developmental characteristics. METHODS: Chest computed tomography images obtained from January 2012 to March 2022 were randomly selected from the imaging system of the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. We divided the images of children into a total of 19 groups: aged 0-3 months (1 group), 4-12 months (1 group) and 1 year to 17 years (17 groups), with 50 males and 50 females, totaling 100 children in each group. HI was measured in the plane where the lowest point of the anterior thoracic wall was located and statistically analysed using SPSS 26.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 1900 patients were included in the study. Our results showed that HI, transverse diameter and anterior-posterior diameter were positively correlated with age (P < 0.05). Using age as the independent variable and HI as the dependent variable, the best-fit regression equations were HI-male = 2.047 * Age0.054(R2 = 0.276, P<0.0001) and HI-female = 2.045 * Age0.067(R2 = 0.398, P<0.0001). Males had significantly larger thoracic diameters than females, and there was little difference in the HI between the 2 sexes. CONCLUSIONS: The HI rapidly increases during the neonatal period, slowly increases during infancy and stops increasing during puberty, with no significant differences between the sexes.

Impact of delayed removal of pectus bar on outcomes following Nuss repair: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Usually, pectus bars are removed 3 years after the Nuss procedure in patients with pectus excavatum. However, the optimal timing for postoperative pectus bar removal remains undefined. Our study investigated the effects of delayed pectus bar removal after Nuss repairs. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected on patients who underwent Nuss procedures for pectus excavatum and had their bars removed from August 2014 to December 2020. Patients with correction periods > 3 years were divided into group A (< 6 years) and group B (≥ 6 years). Propensity score matching was used to compare complications and radiological outcomes associated with bar removal. RESULTS: Of the 542 patients who underwent bar removal, 451 (Group A: 419 patients, Group B: 32) had correction duration > 3 years. The average correction duration was 4.5 ± 1.4 years. After propensity score matching analysis, group B [median duration: 8.0 (6.0-16.2) years] exhibited significantly longer median operative times (85 vs. 55 min; P = 0.026), higher callus formation rates (68.8% vs. 46.9%; P = 0.029), and greater median intraoperative blood loss (35 vs. 10 mL; P = 0.017) than group A [median duration: 4.2 (3.0-5.9) years]. However, following bar removal, the groups showed no statistical differences in the surgical complication rates (group A: 6.3% vs. group B: 9.4%; P = 0.648) or median ratio of radiological improvement (an improvement on the Haller index on chest radiography; 21.0% vs. 22.2%; P = 0.308). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying pectus bar removal after Nuss repair presents certain challenges but does not compromise overall outcomes. These findings suggest that a longer correction period may be unnecessary. However, further multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to assess long-term outcomes.

Pectus excavatum. Surgical treatment: Structural or aesthetic?

INTRODUCTION: Pectus excavatum is a wall deformity that often warrants medical evaluation. In most cases, it's a purely visual aesthetic alteration, while in others, it comes with symptoms. Several surgical techniques have been described, but their outcomes are difficult to assess due to the heterogeneity of presentations and the lack of long-term follow-up. We present our experience as thoracic surgeons, assessing correction as either structural (remodeling of the thoracic cage through open surgery) or aesthetic (design and implantation of a customized 3D prosthesis). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of the indication for surgical treatment of pectus excavatum carried out by a team of thoracic surgeons and the short- to mid-term results. RESULTS: Between 2021 and 2023, we treated 36 cases surgically, either through thoracic cage remodeling techniques or with 3D prostheses. There were few minor complications, and the short- to mid-term results were positive: alleviation of symptoms or compression of structures when present, or aesthetic correction of the defect in other cases. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for pectus excavatum should be evaluated for structural correction of the wall or aesthetics. In the former, thoracic cage remodeling requiring cartilage excision and possibly osteotomies is necessary. In the latter, the defect is corrected with a customized 3D prosthesis.

Is pregnancy safe with an implanted pectus bar? An uneventful pregnancy with implanted pectus bar following correction of pectus excavatum.

Limited data are available on the implications on pregnancy following pectus bar implantation for correction of pectus excavatum (Nuss procedure), while the pectus bars are in place. Limited data is also available on long-term reproductive implications following pectus bar removal.Providers at times need to consider the necessity to counsel a woman desiring pectus excavatum correction and pregnancy whether to postpone one of the two in favour of the other.We present the case of a woman of reproductive age with an uneventful pregnancy and delivery while carrying an implanted pectus bar and subsequent uneventful pregnancy and delivery after bar removal.

Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural analgesia for minimal invasive Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial (ICE trial).

INTRODUCTION: Epidural analgesia is currently considered the gold standard in postoperative pain management for the minimally invasive Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Alternative analgesic strategies (eg, patient-controlled analgesia and paravertebral nerve block) fail in accomplishing adequate prolonged pain management. Furthermore, the continuous use of opioids, often prescribed in addition to all pain management strategies, comes with side effects. Intercostal nerve cryoablation seems a promising novel technique. Hence, the primary objective of this study is to determine the impact of intercostal nerve cryoablation on postoperative length of hospital stay compared with standard pain management of young pectus excavatum patients treated with the minimally invasive Nuss procedure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol is designed for a single centre, prospective, unblinded, randomised clinical trial. Intercostal nerve cryoablation will be compared with thoracic epidural analgesia in 50 young pectus excavatum patients (ie, 12-24 years of age) treated with the minimally invasive Nuss procedure. Block randomisation, including stratification based on age (12-16 years and 17-24 years) and sex, with an allocation ratio of 1:1 will be performed.Postoperative length of hospital stay will be recorded as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include (1) pain intensity, (2) operative time, (3) opioid usage, (4) complications, including neuropathic pain, (5) creatine kinase activity, (6) intensive care unit admissions, (7) readmissions, (8) postoperative mobility, (9) health-related quality of life, (10) days to return to work/school, (11) number of postoperative outpatient visits and (12) hospital costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the local Medical Ethics Review Committee, METC Zuyderland and Zuyd University of Applied Sciences. Participation in this study will be voluntary and informed consent will be obtained. Regardless of the outcome, the results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed international medical journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05731973.

Outcomes After Pectus Excavatum Repair: Center Volume Matters.

PURPOSE: Pectus excavatum (Pectus) repair may be offered for those with significant cardiopulmonary compromise or severe cosmetic defects. The influence of hospital center volume on postoperative outcomes in children is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of children undergoing Pectus repair, stratified by hospital surgical volume. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database was queried (2016-2020) for patients with Pectus (Q67.6). Patients were stratified into those who received repair at high-volume centers (HVCs; ≥20 repairs annually) versus low-volume centers (LVCs; <20 repairs annually). Demographics and outcomes were analyzed using standard statistical tests. RESULTS: A total of 9414 patients with Pectus underwent repair during the study period, with 69% treated at HVCs and 31% at LVCs. Patients at LVCs experienced higher rates of complications during index admission, including pneumothorax (23% vs. 15%), chest tube placement (5% vs. 2%), and overall perioperative complications (28% vs. 24%) compared to those treated at HVCs, all p < 0.001. Patients treated at LVCs had higher readmission rates within 30 days (3.8% vs. 2.8% HVCs) and overall readmission (6.8% vs. 4.7% HVCs), both p < 0.010. Among readmitted patients (n = 547), the most frequent complications during readmission for those initially treated at LVCs included pneumothorax/hemothorax (21% vs. 8%), bar dislodgment (21% vs. 12%), and electrolyte disorders (15% vs. 9%) compared to those treated at HVCs. CONCLUSION: Pediatric Pectus repair performed at high-volume centers was associated with fewer index complications and readmissions compared to lower-volume centers. Patients and surgeons should consider this hospital volume-outcome relationship. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Body measurement changes in adults with pectus excavatum after the Nuss procedure: a study of 272 patients.

BACKGROUND: Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common congenital abnormality of the chest wall. Most patients with PE have slim bodies. Some studies have been conducted on the physical growth of children and adolescents who underwent the Nuss procedure. This study aimed to evaluate body measurement changes in adult patients with PE after the Nuss procedure. METHODS: A total of 272 adult PE patients, who underwent the Nuss procedure and pectus bars removal from August 2014 to December 2020, were evaluated retrospectively. Body measurement [body height (BH), body weight (BW), and body mass index (BMI)] of the patients were collected before Nuss repair and after bar removal. We used the interquartile range (IQR) to identify and exclude outliers. Associations between changes in body measurement and clinical and radiological features were evaluated. RESULTS: The BH, BW and BMI showed significantly increased after pectus bar removal, compared to pre-Nuss procedure parameters (BH 173.8 ± 5.9 cm vs. 173.9 ± 5.9 cm, P < 0.001; BW 60.3 ± 8.1 kg vs. 61.1 ± 8.8 kg, P = 0.005; BMI 19.9 ± 2.2 kg/m2 vs. 20.1 ± 2.4 kg/m2, P = 0.02). The same result were observed in the male subgroup, the HI ≥ 4 group and the male subgroup within the HI ≥ 4 group. CONCLUSIONS: The BH, BW and BMI were significantly increased after completing surgical correction of PE using the Nuss procedure, particularly in young males and patients with more pronounced deformities.

Biomechanical Effectivity Evaluation of Single- and Double-Metal-Bar Methods with Rotation and Equilibrium Displacements in Nuss Procedure Simulations.

Surgical treatment of the pectus excavatum has led to the introduction of the Nuss procedure, a minimally invasive surgical procedure that involves inserting a metal bar under the sternum through a small lateral thoracic incision. An additional metal bar was inserted in patients with pectus excavatum to improve the retention of the restored chest wall after the Nuss procedure. However, a need still exists to analyze the mechanistic advantages and disadvantages of the double-bar method owing to the increased surgical time and proficiency. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the efficiency of single- and double-bar methods using rotational and equilibrium displacement simulations of the Nuss procedure. A finite-element model was constructed for two types of metal bars inserted into the chest wall. Boundary conditions for the rotation and equilibrium displacements were set for the metal bar. The anterior sternal translation, Haller index and maximum equivalent stress and strain owing to the behavior of the metal bar were estimated and compared with the single-bar method and postoperatively acquired patient data. The simulation results showed that the influences of the intercostal muscle and equilibrium after rotation displacement were significant. The stresses and strains were distributed across the two metal bars, and the upper-metal bar was heavily loaded. The double-bar method was advantageous regarding the load distribution effects of the two metal bars on the chest wall. However, mechanical assessments are also important because an excessive load is typically applied to the upper-metal bar.

The implementation of a pectus bar insertion enhanced recovery after surgery pathway: A quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND: Pectus excavatum repair is associated with significant discomfort, and pain is a primary contributor to postoperative hospital length of stay. Recent advances in postoperative pain control include the use of intercostal cryoablation techniques that may now make it possible to discharge patients on the day of surgery. Unnecessary variation in patient care and noncompliance with care bundles may be a factor in extended length of stay. The global aim of this quality improvement initiative was to successfully implement an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair. The SMART aim was to have a greater than 70% compliance for the perioperative bundle elements within 1 year of the pathway implementation. METHODS: Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were designed to create and implement an ERAS pathway for patients undergoing a pectus bar insertion procedure. This multidisciplinary pathway was designed, managed, and implemented with key stakeholders from the Departments of Evidence Based Practice, Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Perioperative Nursing. Patient characteristics, outcomes, and compliance with elements of the pathway were measured for analysis for both the baseline and post-intervention groups with monthly automated reports. RESULTS: After implementation of the ERAS pathway, data on the first 50 patients showed a 90% compliance with the perioperative bundle elements. Mean length of stay was significantly decreased from 33 h (95% CI [28.76, 37.31]) to 18 h (95% CI [14.54, 21.70]). There were zero readmissions within 24 hours for patients who were discharged on the day of surgery. CONCLUSION: Employing a multidisciplinary approach in both planning and execution that standardized clinician practices and minimized unnecessary variation in patient care, an ERAS pathway for pectus bar insertion has been successfully established at our institution.

Intercostal spinal nerve cryoablation for analgesia following pectus excavatum repair.

Pectus excavatum is a common chest wall deformity, most often treated during adolescence, that presents a significant postoperative pain control challenge for pediatric surgeons following surgical correction. The purpose of this article is to review the technique and outcomes of intercostal spinal nerve cryoablation for postoperative analgesia following surgical correction of pectus excavatum. Contemporary and historic literature were reviewed. Findings are summarized to provide a concise synopsis of the benefits of intercostal spinal nerve cryoablation relative to alternative analgesic modalities, as well as advocate for more widespread inclusion of this technique into multimodal pain regimens.

Recent Advancements in Pectus Surgery: Crane Lifting, Multiple-Bar Approach, Bridge Stabilization, and Sandwich Technique.

PURPOSE: The most recent procedure for pectus excavatum repair involves crane-powered entire chest wall remodeling, which employs crane lifting, multiple-bar approach, bridge stabilization, and sandwich techniques. This resulted in a paradigm shift in pectus deformity repair from merely lifting the sunken bone to remodeling the chest wall into normal anatomy. METHODS: We analyzed 649 patients who underwent surgery for pectus excavatum or complex combined deformities between March 2018 and January 2022. A crane with sternal wiring or screwing was used to lift the chest wall without using the pectus bar turning power. Multiple bars with bridge connections were placed to eliminate bar displacement. Modified sandwich techniques were applied to relieve the lower coastal flare (flare-buster) and focal protuberance (magic string). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 12.2 years (range: 3-45 years). A single bar was used for 202 patients until 2021. For the multiple-bar technique, parallel bars (n = 142), crossbars (n = 166), and crossbars plus upper horizontal bars (XI pattern; n = 139) were used. The overall complication rate was 6.2 %. There was no cases of bar displacement were observed, but other minor complications such as pneumothorax (n = 20, 3.1 %), pleural effusion (n = 7, 1.1 %), and wound infection (n = 5, 0.8 %) were detected. Three patients required reoperation (infection, two: hemorrhage, one). CONCLUSIONS: The crane-powered entire chest wall remodeling technique improved the safety and comprehensiveness of the repair procedure. By incorporating bridge stabilization and the use of multiple bars, we effectively resolved the issues related to bar displacement and incomplete repair. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Cohort Study.