Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 779
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 13157, 2024 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849393

ABSTRACT

National consensus recommendations have recently been developed to standardize colorectal tumour localization and documentation during colonoscopy. In this qualitative semi-structured interview study, we identified and contrast the perceived barriers and facilitators to using these new recommendations according to gastroenterologists and surgeons in a large central Canadian city. Interviews were analyzed according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) through directed content analysis. Solutions were categorized using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework. Eleven gastroenterologists and ten surgeons participated. Both specialty groups felt that the new recommendations were clearly written, adequately addressed current care practice tensions, and offered a relative advantage versus existing practices. The new recommendations appeared appropriately complex, applicable to most participants, and could be trialed and adapted prior to full implementation. Major barriers included a lack of relevant external or internal organizational incentives, non-existing formal feedback processes, and a lack of individual familiarity with the evidence behind some recommendations. With application of the ERIC framework, common barriers could be addressed through accessing new funding, altering incentive structures, changing record systems, educational interventions, identifying champions, promoting adaptability, and employing audit/feedback processes. Future research is needed to test strategies for feasibility and effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Gastroenterologists , Surgeons , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/methods , Canada , Male , Female , Attitude of Health Personnel , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Middle Aged
2.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 204, 2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is prevalent worldwide and can lead to peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastric cancer. Effective diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection by gastroenterologists and family physicians is crucial. However, there are differing views on optimal diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study is to understand the impressions of Canadian physicians regarding H. pylori diagnosis and treatment and whether impressions differ between gastroenterologists and family physicians. A second objective is to understand physician perspectives on rising antibiotic resistance and how that guides empiric management. METHODS: A survey facilitated via REDCap was administered to Canadian gastroenterologists and family physicians. A total of 105 participants completed the survey, including 43 gastroenterologists and 62 family physicians. Gastroenterologists were recruited from across the country and family physicians were recruited from Manitoba. RESULTS: For diagnosis of H. pylori, 67% of gastroenterologists reported endoscopic biopsies for histology assessment as most common and 73% of family physicians reported serology as their main diagnostic test. While nearly all gastroenterologists believed antibiotic resistance to be a problem, nearly one quarter of family physicians did not believe it was a problem. CONCLUSIONS: There is variability in practices among both gastroenterologists and family physicians regarding diagnosis of H. pylori infection. There was consensus that local antibiotic resistance patterns should guide management. If known, the degree and patterns of antibiotic resistance could bring a more uniform consensus to H. pylori management. Greater education of physicians, especially family physicians regarding management of H pylori is needed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Humans , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Canada , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gastroenterologists , Male , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Adult , Biopsy/statistics & numerical data
4.
BMC Med Educ ; 24(1): 529, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741179

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Management of inflammatory bowel disease is constantly evolving, increasing the importance for gastroenterologists to keep up to date with guidelines. Traditional implementation strategies have had only small positive impacts on clinical practice. eHealth strategies such as the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation e-guide may be beneficial for clinician decision making in keeping with guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the e-guide. METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate feasibility and acceptability. Cognitive (think-aloud) interviews were conducted with Australian gastroenterologists while using the e-guide. Two clinical scenarios were developed to allow evaluation of various aspects of the e-guide. Content analysis was applied to the qualitative interview data and descriptive analysis to the quantitative and observational data. RESULTS: Seventeen participants completed the study. Data saturation were reached. The ECCO e-guide was largely feasible and acceptable, as demonstrated by most clinical questions answered correctly, 87% reaching the answer within 3 min, and most feeling it was useful, would be beneficial to their practice and would use it again. Issues raised included difficulties with website navigation, layout of the e-guide and difficulties with access (network firewalls, paid subscription required). CONCLUSIONS: The ECCO e-guide is largely acceptable and feasible for gastroenterologists to use. Aspects of the e-guide could be modified to improve user experience. This study highlights the importance of engaging end-users in the development and evaluation of clinician educational tools.


Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Feasibility Studies , Gastroenterologists , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Australia , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Europe , Attitude of Health Personnel , Gastroenterology
5.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2349319, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755111

ABSTRACT

Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) are more susceptible to experiencing severe complications of COVID-19 if infected. Nevertheless, sub-optimal immunization rates have been reported among these patients. Our study aims to assess COVID-19 VH among a global population of patients with IBD and to investigate the role of healthcare professionals, particularly gastroenterologists, in promoting immunization. Twenty-six studies were systematically selected from scientific articles in the MEDLINE/PubMed, WoK, and Scopus databases from January 1, 2020, to September 15, 2023. The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 VH was 27.2% (95%CI = 20.6-34.2%). A significant relationship was evidenced between COVID-19 vaccine compliance and receiving advice from gastroenterologists or healthcare providers (OR = 2.77; 95%CI = 1.79-4.30). By leveraging their knowledge of IBD, familiarity with patient histories, and trusted patient-doctor relationships, gastroenterologists are pivotal in promoting vaccination. This patient-centered care is crucial in increasing vaccine acceptance among individuals with IBD, contributing to better public health outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Gastroenterologists , Health Personnel , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Vaccination , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Gastroenterologists/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
8.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 99(4): 640-648, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38569813

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic and progressive immune-mediated esophageal disorder. Given its increasing incidence, it is now a leading cause of dysphagia and food impaction in the United States. Eosinophilic esophagitis is most common in adult White men and has a high concurrence rate with other atopic conditions like allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma, and eczema. The initial presentation includes symptoms of esophageal dysfunction, classically solid-food dysphagia. Without treatment, inflammation can progress to fibrosis with the formation of strictures, leading to complications such as food impaction. It is a clinicopathologic disease requiring compatible clinical symptoms and histologic evidence of eosinophil-predominant inflammation of the esophageal epithelium with more than 15 eosinophils per high-power field. The mainstay of management includes the 3 d's (diet, drugs, dilation): dietary modifications to eliminate trigger food groups; medications including proton pump inhibitors, swallowed topical glucocorticoids, and dupilumab; and esophageal dilation to manage strictures. Various elimination diets have been found to be effective, including 1-food, 2-food, 4-food, and 6-food elimination diets. Dupilumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that regulates interleukin 4 and 13 signaling pathways, has shown promising results in clinical trials and was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2022 for use in EoE. Symptom alleviation, although important, is not the sole end point of treatment in EoE as persistent inflammation, even in the absence of symptoms, can lead to esophageal fibrosis and stricture formation over time. The chronic nature and high recurrence rates of EoE warrant maintenance therapy in patients with EoE after initial remission is achieved.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Gastroenterologists , Male , Adult , Humans , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/therapy , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Constriction, Pathologic/complications , Constriction, Pathologic/drug therapy , Inflammation/drug therapy , Fibrosis , Primary Health Care , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use
9.
Dig Dis Sci ; 69(6): 1990-1995, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38637458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many women grow up dreaming of becoming doctors, preferring specialties that allow more focus on time outside the hospital and on family life. Nowadays, specialties, like gastroenterology, have still a significant gender gap. METHODS: Based on this known discrepancy, a web-based questionnaire was designed by the Young Component of the Scientific Committee of the Federation of Italian Scientific Societies of Digestive Diseases 2023 (FISMAD) to examine the current situation of female gastroenterologists in Italy. The survey, designed specifically for this study, was sent by email to all female gastroenterologists and residents gastroenterologists, members of the three major Italian societies of Gastroenterology. RESULTS: A total of 423 female physicians responded to the survey: 325 (76.8%) had full-time employment, and only a few had an academic career (7.2%). The main occupations were outpatient clinics (n = 288, 68%) and diagnostic endoscopy (n = 289, 68.3%); only 175 (41.3%) performed interventional endoscopy. One hundred and forty-seven (34.7%) had the chance to attend a master in advanced or interventional endoscopy, while 133 (31.4%) faced disadvantages that enabled them to attend. Of the 244 (58%) who reported feeling underappreciated, 194 (79.5%) said it was due to gender bias. We found that women doctors considered themselves disadvantaged compared with men doctors due to career opportunities (n = 338), salary negotiations (n = 64), and training opportunities (n = 144). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, gastroenterology still has a long way to go before approaching greater gender parity.


Subject(s)
Gastroenterologists , Gastroenterology , Physicians, Women , Humans , Female , Italy , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Gastroenterology/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Gastroenterologists/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Middle Aged , Career Choice , Sexism/statistics & numerical data
11.
12.
Pol Przegl Chir ; 96(2): 68-73, 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629276

ABSTRACT

In recent years, much has been written about the possibilities of using exogenous sodium butyrate in the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, in prehabilitation, in peri- and postoperative treatment, as well as its local application. It became possible thanks to the development of a special formulation (microencapsulation technique) enabling the delivery of unstable butyrate compounds to the large intestine, where it is used primarily as a source of energy. It also plays a key role in maintaining body homeostasis by maintaining the integrity of the intestinal epithelium and stimulating the intestinal immune system. There is growing evidence of the effectiveness of sodium butyrate in various areas of health. The following article discusses the possibilities of using microencapsulated sodium butyrate in the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases from the perspective of a gastroenterologist and gastrointestinal surgeon.


Subject(s)
Gastroenterologists , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Humans , Butyric Acid/therapeutic use , Intestines , Gastrointestinal Diseases/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Diseases/surgery
13.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 47(4): 337-346, Abr. 2024. mapas, graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-231800

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Describir de manera detallada la epidemiología, diagnóstico, manejo clínico, opciones de tratamiento, impacto en la calidad de vida y necesidades no cubiertas de los pacientes con fibrosis hepática avanzada (F3-F4) asociada a esteatohepatitis no alcohólica (NASH) en España. Metodología: Estudio Delphi de dos rondas de consulta con 41 hepatólogos expertos de 16 comunidades autónomas para recoger su experiencia en práctica clínica. Resultados: La prevalencia estimada de pacientes adultos diagnosticados de fibrosis F3-F4 asociada a NASH en España es de 0,019% (intervalo de confianza [IC] 95%: 0,019-0,020%). Aproximadamente 7.588 adultos con este padecimiento están actualmente diagnosticados y son manejados en los Servicios de Aparato Digestivo de los hospitales españoles, y alrededor de 1.881 nuevos pacientes son diagnosticados cada año. El manejo es multidisciplinar e incluye las especialidades de Aparato Digestivo, Endocrinología y Medicina interna, considerando las frecuentes comorbilidades metabólicas asociadas (obesidad, diabetes mellitus tipo 2 o sobrecarga férrica dismetabólica). A pesar del claro impacto en la calidad de vida, este no se evalúa rutinariamente en la práctica clínica. Las técnicas diagnósticas no invasivas más utilizadas son la elastografía de transición y el índice de fibrosis hepática 4 (FIB-4). La ausencia de tratamientos eficaces y seguros se presenta como la principal necesidad no cubierta para el manejo de estos pacientes. Conclusiones: Este estudio proporciona una representación de la situación actual de los pacientes diagnosticados con fibrosis F3-F4 asociada a NASH en España, incrementando la evidencia disponible y contribuyendo a la toma de decisiones informadas por parte de los profesionales y el sistema sanitario. (AU)


Objective: To describe in detail the epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical management, treatment options, impact on quality of life and unmet needs of patients with advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4) associated with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in Spain. Methodology: Delphi study of two rounds of consultation rounds with 41 expert hepatologists from 16 autonomous communities to collect their experience in clinical practice. Results: The estimated prevalence of adult patients diagnosed with F3-F4 fibrosis associated with NASH in Spain is 0.019% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.019-0.020%). Approximately 7,588 adults with this condition are currently diagnosed and managed in the Digestive System Services of Spanish hospitals, and around 1,881 new patients are diagnosed each year. Management is multidisciplinary and includes the specialties of Digestive System, Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, considering the frequently associated metabolic comorbidities (obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus or dysmetabolic iron overload). Despite a clear impact on quality of life, this it is not routinely evaluated in clinical practice. The most widely used non-invasive diagnostic techniques are transitional elastography and liver fibrosis index 4 (FIB-4). The absence of effective and safe treatments appears as the main unmet need for the management of these patients. Conclusions: This study provides a representation of the current situation of patients diagnosed with F3-F4 fibrosis associated with NASH in Spain, increasing the evidence available and contributing to informed decision-making by professionals and the health system. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis/therapy , Quality of Life , Gastroenterologists , Digestive System , Hospitals , Spain
14.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 36(6): 735-741, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683191

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data on the management of Hepatitis B-Delta (HB-D) by hepatogastroenterologists (HGs) practicing in nonacademic hospitals or private practices are unknown in France. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge and practices of HGs practicing in nonacademic settings regarding HB-D. METHODS: A Google form document was sent to those HGs from May to September 2021. RESULTS: A total of 130 HGs (mean age, 45 years) have participated in this survey. Among HBsAg-positive patients, Delta infection was sought in only 89% of cases. Liver fibrosis was assessed using FibroScan in 77% of the cases and by liver biopsy in 81% of the cases. A treatment was proposed for patients with >F2 liver fibrosis in 49% of the cases regardless of transaminase levels and for all the patients by 39% of HGs. Responding HGs proposed a treatment using pegylated interferon in 50% of cases, bulevirtide in 45% of cases and a combination of pegylated interferon and bulevirtide in 40.5% of cases. Among the criteria to evaluate the treatment efficacy, a decrease or a normalization of transaminases was retained by 89% of responding HGs, a reduction of liver fibrosis score for 70% of them, an undetectable delta RNA and HBsAg for 55% of them and a 2 log 10 decline in delta viremia for 62% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis Delta screening was not systematically performed in HBsAg-positive patients despite the probable awareness and knowledge of the few responders who were able to prescribe treatments of hepatitis delta.


Subject(s)
Gastroenterologists , Hepatitis D , Hepatitis Delta Virus , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy , France , Gastroenterology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis Delta Virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Hepatitis D/blood , Hepatitis D/diagnosis , Hepatitis D/drug therapy , Hepatitis D/epidemiology
15.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 12(5): 627-637, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38532266

ABSTRACT

Small molecule drugs are becoming increasingly used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, unlike monoclonal antibody drugs, which have few interactions with other medications, the pharmacokinetics of small molecule drugs are complex and may be influenced by a myriad of drug-drug interactions (DDI) as well as by patient characteristics and food intake. This review aims to provide a concise practical guide to small molecule drug interactions for the use of IBD physicians. It starts with a brief overview of the main metabolizing enzymes and transporters involved in drug interactions and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) approach to determining drug-interaction hazard thresholds. It is then followed by a more detailed review of the pharmacokinetics of five novel small molecules approved in IBD: Tofacitinib, Upadacitinib, Filgotinib, Ozanimod, and Etrasimod, including their known interactions and specific warnings. This review will also inform readers on challenges in determining the actual magnitude of interactions and their clinical relevance, including the arbitrary nature of some hazard thresholds, the inference of the impact on metabolizing enzymes and transporters from single-drug assays which may not reflect poly-pharmaceutical regimens, and other challenges in this field which the IBD physician needs to be cognizant of. In practice, before administering a small molecule drug, it is advisable to evaluate any potential interactions with other medications the patient is receiving. An increased awareness by health care professionals and patients, may reduce the possible risks associated with DDI of small molecule IBD drugs.


Subject(s)
Drug Interactions , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Piperidines , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Piperidines/pharmacokinetics , Piperidines/pharmacology , Pyrimidines/pharmacokinetics , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Agents/pharmacokinetics , Gastroenterologists , United States Food and Drug Administration , Pyridines/pharmacokinetics , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyridines/adverse effects , Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring , Indans , Oxadiazoles , Triazoles
16.
Digestion ; 105(3): 224-231, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479373

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive and standardized colonoscopy reports are crucial in colorectal cancer prevention, monitoring, and research. This study investigates adherence to national and international guidelines by analyzing reporting practices among 21 endoscopists in 7 German centers, with a focus on polyp reporting. METHODS: We identified and assessed German, European, American, and World Health Organization-provided statements to identify key elements in colonoscopy reporting. Board-certified gastroenterologists rated the relevance of each element and estimated their reporting frequency. Adherence to the identified report elements was evaluated for 874 polyps from 351 colonoscopy reports ranging from March 2021 to March 2022. RESULTS: We identified numerous recommendations for colonoscopy reporting. We categorized the reasoning behind those recommendations into clinical relevance, justification, and quality control and research. Although all elements were considered relevant by the surveyed gastroenterologists, discrepancies were observed in the evaluated reports. Particularly diminutive polyps or attributes which are rarely abnormal (e.g., surface integrity) respectively rarely performed (e.g., injection) were sparsely documented. Furthermore, the white light morphology of polyps was inconsistently documented using either the Paris classification or free text. In summary, the analysis of 874 reported polyps revealed heterogeneous adherence to the recommendations, with reporting frequencies ranging from 3% to 89%. CONCLUSION: The inhomogeneous report practices may result from implicit reporting practices and recommendations with varying clinical relevance. Future recommendations should clearly differentiate between clinical relevance and research and quality control or explanatory purposes. Additionally, the role of computer-assisted documentation should be further evaluated to increase report frequencies of non-pathological findings and diminutive polyps.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Colonoscopy/standards , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colonoscopy/methods , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Germany , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Quality Improvement , Gastroenterologists/statistics & numerical data , Gastroenterologists/standards , Documentation/standards , Documentation/statistics & numerical data , Documentation/methods
17.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 35(2): 112-118, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our aim is to examine the representation of woman gastroenterologists in both work and social life in Turkey and to elucidate the difficulties they encounter during their career pathways or while actively practicing their profession. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self-structured survey consisting of 25 questions was sent via email to all 152 female gastroenterologists. Survey results were received from 140 participants. RESULTS: Sixty percent of the woman gastroenterologists had marriage-career conflicts, and 74% of them stated that they could not manage work-life balance with their children. Among these woman gastroenterologists, 46.6% of them reported that they had faced carrier-related barriers and challenges while applying for an academic rise or expecting a promotion in their job, 58.5% were exposed to gender mobbing, and 35.6% were subjected to verbal or physical violence. On the other hand, woman gastroenterologists are found to be underrepresented in endoscopic interventions where only one-third of the participants perform invasive endoscopic procedures, and the percentage of those who perform advanced endoscopy such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection remains even less as 8.9%. The number of women in leadership positions during their careers is found to be low, and only 2 women were selected as the president of the society since 1959, the establishment time of the Turkish Society of Gastroenterology. CONCLUSION: More effort is needed to keep a fair gender balance in Turkish gastroenterology society and to increase the women's representation in therapeutic endoscopy options and also in leadership positions.


Subject(s)
Gastroenterologists , Physicians, Women , Female , Humans , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Gastroenterology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Turkey
18.
Postgrad Med ; 136(1): 67-77, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38445664

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To understand the role of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) and their referral patterns and treatment expectations. METHODS: This survey-based study was conducted between September 2020 and October 2020. US-based PCPs managing at least one patient with Crohn's disease per week were included. Participants were presented with two case vignettes relevant to primary care practice; Case Vignette 1 comprised three parts and focused on initial CPF presentation and progression to partial response; Case Vignette 2 focused on recurrent CPF. Survey questions elicited the physician's clinical approach to each case. Data were presented as descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Overall, 151 PCPs (median 23 years in practice) who saw about three patients per month with new/existing CPF responded. For Case Vignette 1, upon identification of a fistulous tract, 89% of respondents would refer the patient, mostly to a colorectal surgeon or gastroenterologist. Most PCPs (69%) would begin the patient on medication; 46% would conduct a diagnostic/imaging study. Treatment expectations after referral varied: 55% of respondents believed surgeons would place a seton or use one prior to surgery; 23% expected medical management only; 23% were unsure. Case Vignette 2 revealed that 98% of PCPs preferred to be involved in patient care after referral; however, only 49% were. Of these, 76% considered reinforcing patient treatment adherence as their primary role. While 80% of PCPs were at least moderately satisfied with communication and care coordination with multidisciplinary teams, 52% considered lack of access to specialists as at least a moderate barrier to multidisciplinary team management. CONCLUSION: PCPs want more involvement in multidisciplinary management of patients with CPF. Continuing education providing PCPs with up-to-date information on diagnostic modalities, treatment options, early diagnosis, the role of PCPs within a multidisciplinary team, and effective initial CPF care is required.


What were the study's aims?To understand how primary care physicians recognize, treat, and monitor patients with Crohn's disease-related perianal fistulas (small tunnels between the bowel and skin near the anus).How was the study done?US-based primary care physicians, including internists, were included if they had experience in treating patients with Crohn's disease. Descriptions of the history and symptoms of two hypothetical patients were provided: one patient who may have Crohn's perianal fistulas and another patient whose Crohn's perianal fistulas had returned after being treated. After reading these descriptions, the physicians completed a questionnaire designed to show how they would help each patient.What did the study find out?Not all physicians treat patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas in the same way in terms of diagnostic tests and medical treatments, although most said they would refer them to a specialist if a fistula was identified. Many wanted to be involved in patient care after referral to a specialist but only half were. Of those, most thought their main role was to ensure patients followed the treatments given by specialists. More than half of primary care physicians thought a lack of access to specialists could be a barrier to care.How does this impact care?The physicians surveyed want more involvement in multidisciplinary teams who look after patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas. To do this, they need more education about the diagnosis and treatment of Crohn's perianal fistulas, and clarity around their role within multidisciplinary teams who manage these patients.


Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Gastroenterologists , Physicians, Primary Care , Humans , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/therapy , Communication , Patient Compliance
19.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) ; 89(1): 89-105, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485558

ABSTRACT

New oncologic treatments, particularly immunotherapy (IT), have revolutionized the treatment of advanced-stage malignant tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the main form of IT and act by increasing T cell activity and the organism's immune response against neoplastic cells. Targeted therapy is another form of IT that acts by inhibiting oncogenes or inflammation signaling and tumor angiogenesis pathways. However, these mechanisms of tumor destruction can interfere with the host's immune self-tolerance or with the mechanisms of epithelial tissue repair and predispose to immune system-mediated adverse events that can affect multiple organs, including the digestive tract. The gastrointestinal manifestations of damage caused by IT can range from low-grade mucositis to ulceration, and in some cases, necrosis and perforation. Any part of the gastrointestinal tract can be affected, but there is greater involvement of the small bowel and colon, with a pattern similar to that seen in inflammatory bowel disease. The most common clinical manifestation is chronic diarrhea. The differential diagnosis includes enteropathogenic infections, especially those caused by opportunistic microorganisms; adverse drug reactions; and other inflammatory and malabsorption disorders. Treatment is guided by damage severity. Mild cases can be treated with antidiarrheals and rehydration in the outpatient setting; moderate cases with hospitalization, systemic steroids, and temporary suspension of IT; and severe cases with immunosuppressants or biologic agents and definitive suspension of IT.


Subject(s)
Enterocolitis , Gastroenterologists , Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/etiology , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Enterocolitis/etiology
20.
J Dig Dis ; 25(1): 61-69, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408848

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease that affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in perceptions of PBC among physicians from different hospital departments and patients with PBC. METHODS: An online survey regarding the general knowledge, diagnosis, and management of PBC was completed by physicians and patients. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients with PBC and 239 physicians from eight hospital departments (gastroenterology, infectious diseases, rheumatology, hepatobiliary surgery, pathology, clinical laboratory, ultrasound, and radiology) completed the survey. The results showed that physicians from departments other than gastroenterologists and rheumatologists lacked knowledge of PBC, and that junior gastroenterologists were uncertain about the diagnostic and treatment pathways of PBC. Importantly, the lack of knowledge significantly impacted the QoL of patients, especially the emotional scores of PBC-40 (odds ratio -2.556, 95% confidence interval -3.852 to -1.260, P < 0.001). In addition, there was a perceived knowledge gap between patients and gastroenterologists. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians must improve their awareness of PBC. Patient education and patient-physician communication are important for improving the patient's QoL.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Cholangitis , Gastroenterologists , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/diagnosis , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...