[Gastrointestinal bleeding as debut of complicated celiac disease]. / Hemorragia digestiva como debut de enfermedad celiaca complicada.

Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune malabsorption syndrome that presents with intolerance to gluten (gliadin), a protein found in wheat. The most common symptoms are diarrhea, steatorrhea, weight loss, weakness, vitamin and mineral deficiency. The probability of developing complicated CD is relatively low, among its main manifestations we have refractory sprue, T-cell lymphoma and ulcerative jejunitis (UY) of which a few cases develop gastrointestinal bleeding. Furthermore, we present the case of a 51-year-old patient who developed intestinal hemorrhage due to complicated CD, where upper digestive video endoscopy (VEDA), video colonoscopy (VCC), capsule endoscopy (CE) and biopsy of the jejunum and ileum were performed confirming the diagnosis of CD along with ulcerative jejunoileitis.

[Porto sinusoidal vascular disease: an unusual cause of digestive bleeding]. / Enfermedad vascular porto sinusoidal: una causa inusual de sangrado digestivo.

Portal hypertension (PHT) is defined as an increase in pressure at the level of the portal vein above 5 mmHg, the most common cause being liver cirrhosis. Among the presinusoidal intrahepatic causes of PHT with portal venular involvement, what was traditionally known as idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCIH) is described, with the requirements of excluding those patients who did not present PHT, as well as those with the presence of liver cirrhosis and thrombosis. portal venous vein (PVT). Currently, the diagnostic criteria for this entity have been reconsidered, and its name, being known as porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD), also does not exclude patients with PHT or the presence of underlying liver disease. Liver biopsy continues to be the gold standard for diagnosis. The clinical manifestations are derived from PHT and the management is similar to the complications that occur in patients with liver cirrhosis. The case of a male patient is presented who presents with symptoms of digestive bleeding, with findings of esophageal varices in upper endoscopy in addition to a study of viral, autoimmune liver disease and negative deposits, with a conclusive liver biopsy of porto-sinusoidal vascular disease.

Single center assessment of the role of Oakland score among patients admitted for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The Oakland score was developed to predict safe discharge in patients who present to the emergency department with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). In this study, we retrospectively evaluated if this score can be implemented to assess safe discharge (score ≤ 10) at WellStar Atlanta Medical Center (WAMC). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 108 patients admitted at WAMC from January 1, 2020 to December 30, 2021 was performed. Patients with LGIB based on the ICD-10 codes were included. Oakland score was calculated using 7 variables (age, sex, previous LGIB, digital rectal exam, pulse, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and hemoglobin (Hgb)) for all patients at admission and discharge from the hospital. The total score ranges from 0 to 35 and a score of ≤ 10 is a cut-off that has been shown to predict safe discharge. Hgb and SBP are the main contributors to the score, where lower values correspond to a higher Oakland score. Descriptive and multivariate analysis was performed using SPSS 23 software. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients met the inclusion criteria, 53 (49.1%) were female with racial distribution was as follows: 89 (82.4%) African Americans, 17 (15.7%) Caucasian, and 2 (1.9%) others. Colonoscopy was performed in 69.4% patients; and 61.1% patients required blood transfusion during hospitalization. Mean SBP records at admission and discharge were 129.0 (95% CI, 124.0-134.1) and 130.7 (95% CI,125.7-135.8), respectively. The majority (59.2%) of patients had baseline anemia and the mean Hgb values were 11.0 (95% CI, 10.5-11.5) g/dL at baseline prior to hospitalization, 8.8 (95% CI, 8.2-9.5) g/dL on arrival and 9.4 (95% CI, 9.0-9.7) g/dL at discharge from hospital. On admission, 100/108 (92.6%) of patients had an Oakland score of > 10 of which almost all patients (104/108 (96.2%)) continued to have persistent elevation of Oakland Score greater than 10 at discharge. Even though, the mean Oakland score improved from 21.7 (95% CI, 20.4-23.1) of the day of arrival to 20.3 (95% CI, 19.4-21.2) at discharge, only 4/108 (3.7%) of patients had an Oakland score of ≤ 10 at discharge. Despite this, only 9/108 (8.33%) required readmission for LGIB during a 1-year follow-up. We found that history of admission for previous LGIB was associated with readmission with adjusted odds ratio 4.42 (95% CI, 1.010-19.348, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, nearly all patients who had Oakland score of > 10 at admission continued to have a score above 10 at discharge. If the Oakland Score was used as the sole criteria for discharge most patients would not have met discharge criteria. Interestingly, most of these patients did not require readmission despite an elevated Oakland score at time of discharge, indicating the Oakland score did not really predict safe discharge. A potential confounder was the Oakland score did not consider baseline anemia during calculation. A prospective study to evaluate a modified Oakland score that considers baseline anemia could add value in this patient population.

Acute liver failure with a massive upper GI bleed meeting the criteria of MIS-C.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a known complication of COVID-19. There is still limited knowledge about this condition. Here, we report the case of a previously healthy toddler boy, who presented with acute liver failure and duodenal lesions resulting in severe haematemesis and haemorrhagic shock, requiring intensive care unit care. The patient had persistent transaminitis, a deranged coagulation profile, inflammatory markers were elevated, and laboratory tests were negative for common infectious hepatitis aetiologies as well as COVID-19 Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. His COVID-19 antibody was reactive. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a Forrest grade III duodenal ulcer. Looking into the constellation of symptoms and laboratory findings a confirmed diagnosis of acute viral hepatitis caused by MIS-C was made. Hence, he was given intravenous methylprednisolone along with intravenous immunoglobulins, after which he improved clinically and transaminitis resolved. The patient was discharged on clinical improvement and was doing fine on follow-up up to 6 months.

[Pay attention to the diagnosis and treatment of "easily neglected" complications in liver cirrhosis].

Managing cirrhosis complications is an important measure for improving patients' clinical outcomes. Therefore, in order to provide a complete disease assessment and comprehensive treatment, improve quality of life, and improve the prognosis for patients with cirrhosis, it is necessary to pay attention to complications such as thrombocytopenia and portal vein thrombosis in addition to common or severe complications such as ascites, esophagogastric variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome. The relevant concept that an effective albumin concentration is more helpful in predicting the cirrhosis outcome is gradually being accepted; however, the detection method still needs further standardization and commercialization.

Cutoff CT value can identify upper gastrointestinal bleeding on postmortem CT: Development and validation study.

This study aimed to establish the diagnostic criteria for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) using postmortem computed tomography (PMCT). This case-control study enrolled 27 consecutive patients with autopsy-proven UGIB and 170 of the 566 patients without UGIB who died in a university hospital in Japan after treatment and underwent both noncontrast PMCT and conventional autopsy between 2009 and 2020. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups: derivation and validation sets. Imaging findings of the upper gastrointestinal contents, including CT values, were recorded and evaluated for their power to diagnose UGIB in the derivation set and validated in the validation set. In the derivation set, the mean CT value of the upper gastrointestinal contents was 48.2 Hounsfield units (HU) and 22.8 HU in cases with and without UGIB. The optimal cutoff CT value for diagnosing UGIB was ≥27.7 HU derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (sensitivity, 91.7%; specificity, 81.2%; area under the curve, 0.898). In the validation set, the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing UGIB for the CT cutoff value of ≥27.7 HU were 84.6% and 77.6%, respectively. In addition to the CT value of ≥27.7 HU, PMCT findings of solid-natured gastrointestinal content and intra/peri-content bubbles ≥4 mm, extracted from the derivation set, increased the specificity for UGIB (96.5% and 98.8%, respectively) but decreased the sensitivity (61.5% and 38.5%, respectively) in the validation set. In diagnosing UGIB on noncontrast PMCT, the cutoff CT value of ≥27.7 HU and solid gastrointestinal content were valid and reproducible diagnostic criteria.

The Role of Imaging for Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Consensus Recommendations From the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high healthcare utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including computed tomography angiography, catheter angiography, computed tomography enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided.

Clinical, endoscopic and therapeutic features of bleeding Dieulafoy's lesions: case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Dieulafoy's lesions (DLs) are a rare but potentially life-threatening source of gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage. They are responsible for roughly 1%-6.5% of all cases of acute non-variceal GI bleeding.Here, we describe retrospectively the clinical and endoscopic features, review the short-term and long-term outcomes of endoscopic management of bleeding DLs and we identify rate and risk factors, of recurrence and mortality in our endoscopic unit. DESIGN: Data were collected from patients presenting with GI haemorrhagic secondary to DLs between January 2018 and August 2023. Patients' medical records as well as endoscopic databases were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, risk factors, bleeding site, outcomes of endoscopy techniques, recurrence and mortality rate were taken into account. RESULTS: Among 1170 cases of GI bleeding, we identified only seven cases involving DLs. Median age was 74 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.5. 75% of patients had significant comorbidities, mainly cardiovascular diseases. Only anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents were significantly associated with DLs. All patients were presented with GI bleeding as their initial symptom. The initial endoscopy led to a diagnosis in 85% of the cases. Initial haemostasis was obtained in all patients treated endoscopically. Nevertheless, the study revealed early recurrence in two out of three patients treated solely with epinephrine injection or argon plasma coagulation. In contrast, one of three patients who received combined therapy, experienced late recurrence (average follow-up of 1 year). Pathological diagnosis was necessary in one case. One patient (14%) died of haemorrhagic shock. Average length of hospital stay was 3 days. CONCLUSION: Although rare, DLs may be responsible for active, recurrent and unexplained GI bleeding. Thanks to the emergence of endoscopic therapies, the recurrence rate has decreased and the prognosis has highly improved. Therefore, the endoscopic approach remains the first choice to manage bleeding DLs.

Double balloon enteroscopy versus single balloon enteroscopy: A comparative study.

Device assisted enteroscopy (DAE) like the double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) are postulated to ease small bowel examination and performance of therapy. However, studies comparing the effectiveness of these 2 modalities have yielded varying results. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of SBE and DBE. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent DBE (n = 82) or SBE (n = 45) for small bowel exam in our unit from January 2014 to January 2022. Our primary outcomes were to compare the technical success and diagnostic success rates between DBE and SBE. Our secondary outcomes were to compare the therapeutic success, and complication rates. The main indications were suspected GI bleeding (DBE 41.5% vs SBE 48.9%), iron deficiency anemia (DBE 9.8% vs SBE 4.4%) and small bowel lesions (DBE 28.0% vs SBE 44.4%) detected either from prior capsule endoscopy or radiological imaging. Majority of the enteroscopy exam was by antegrade approach (DBE 67.1% vs SBE 77.8%). We found no significant difference in the technical success (DBE 95.1% vs SBE 97.8%, P = .46), diagnostic success (DBE 69.5% vs SBE 77.8%, P = .36) and the therapeutic success rate (DBE 63.2% vs SBE 54.3%, P = .09) between the groups. Complications occurred in 1 case from each group (mucosal tear). None of the complications were major. In patients who underwent enteroscopy, the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of SBE is similar to DBE. Both procedures were safe with low complication rates.

Artificial intelligence in detection of small bowel lesions and their bleeding risk: A new step forward.

The present letter to the editor is related to the study with the title "Automatic detection of small bowel (SB) lesions with different bleeding risk based on deep learning models". Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the main tool to assess SB diseases but it is a time-consuming procedure with a significant error rate. The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in CE could simplify physicians' tasks. The novel deep learning model by Zhang et al seems to be able to identify various SB lesions and their bleeding risk, and it could pave the way to next perspective studies to better enhance the diagnostic support of AI in the detection of different types of SB lesions in clinical practice.

Examining the Frequency of Second Endoscopy and Its Effect on Patient Outcomes With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Southeast of Iran.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the frequency and impact of repeat endoscopy in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) in a referral hospital in Southeast Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study was conducted on the records of 190 patients who underwent endoscopy for AUGIB in 2019. The study compared the demographic and clinical characteristics, outcomes, and treatments of patients who had a second endoscopy (n=64) with those who did not (n=126). The data were analyzed with SPSS software, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The results showed that repeat endoscopy was not significantly associated with age, gender, initial symptoms, bleeding site, first endoscopy time, or disease outcome. However, repeat endoscopy was significantly associated with higher bleeding severity, different wound types, different bleeding causes, longer hospital stay, and different treatments in the first endoscopy. The main reasons for repeat endoscopy were poor visibility and recurrent bleeding. The majority of repeat endoscopies were performed within 2 days of the first one. Most patients who had a second endoscopy did not receive any treatment, and those who did received combined thermal and epinephrine injections. CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that routine second endoscopy is not necessary for all patients with AUGIB, but it may be beneficial for some cases. Further research is needed to clarify the indications and timing of repeat endoscopy in AUGIB.

A Surviving Case of Myocardial Infarction with Ventricular Septal Rupture and Ventricular Aneurysm following Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

A 55-year-old man presented to the emergency department with worsening shortness of breath 1 month after a gastrointestinal bleed. He had congestive heart failure, and an electrocardiogram suggested ischemic heart disease involvement. Echocardiography revealed a ventricular septal defect complicated by a left ventricular aneurysm in the inferior-posterior wall. Conservative treatment was started, but hemodynamic collapse occurred on the third day of admission and coronary angiography revealed a revascularizing lesion in the right fourth posterior descending coronary artery. Subsequently, his hemodynamic status continued to deteriorate, even with an Impella CP® heart pump, so ventricular septal defect patch closure and left ventricular aneurysm suture were performed. His condition improved and he was discharged on day 23 of admission and was not readmitted within 6 months after the procedure. Hemodynamic management of ventricular septal defects requires devices that reduce afterload, and clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocardial infarction after gastrointestinal bleeding.

Reinforcing the management of type 1 gastric esophageal varices.

Variceal bleed represents an important complication of cirrhosis, with its presence reflecting the severity of liver disease. Gastric varices, though less frequently seen than esophageal varices, present a distinct clinical challenge due to its higher intensity of bleeding and associated mortality. Based upon the Sarin classification, GOV1 is the most common subtype of gastric varices seen in clinical practice.

Outpatient management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: A new perspective in high-risk patients.

Mid-gastrointestinal bleeding accounts for approximately 5%-10% of all gastrointestinal bleeding cases, and vascular lesions represent the most frequent cause. The rebleeding rate for these lesions is quite high (about 42%). We hereby recommend that scheduled outpatient management of these patients could reduce the risk of rebleeding episodes.