Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 10.223
Filter
1.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241265199, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095047

ABSTRACT

Participation in complex listening situations such as group conversations in noisy environments sets high demands on the auditory system and on cognitive processing. Reports of hearing-impaired people indicate that strenuous listening situations occurring throughout the day lead to feelings of fatigue at the end of the day. The aim of the present study was to develop a suitable test sequence to evoke and measure listening effort (LE) and listening-related fatigue (LRF), and, to evaluate the influence of hearing aid use on both dimensions in mild to moderately hearing-impaired participants. The chosen approach aims to reconstruct a representative acoustic day (Time Compressed Acoustic Day [TCAD]) by means of an eight-part hearing-test sequence with a total duration of approximately 2½ h. For this purpose, the hearing test sequence combined four different listening tasks with five different acoustic scenarios and was presented to the 20 test subjects using virtual acoustics in an open field measurement in aided and unaided conditions. Besides subjective ratings of LE and LRF, behavioral measures (response accuracy, reaction times), and an attention test (d2-R) were performed prior to and after the TCAD. Furthermore, stress hormones were evaluated by taking salivary samples. Subjective ratings of LRF increased throughout the test sequence. This effect was observed to be higher when testing unaided. In three of the eight listening tests, the aided condition led to significantly faster reaction times/response accuracies than in the unaided condition. In the d2-R test, an interaction in processing speed between time (pre- vs. post-TCAD) and provision (unaided vs. aided) was found suggesting an influence of hearing aid provision on LRF. A comparison of the averaged subjective ratings at the beginning and end of the TCAD shows a significant increase in LRF for both conditions. At the end of the TCAD, subjective fatigue was significantly lower when wearing hearing aids. The analysis of stress hormones did not reveal significant effects.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Hearing Aids , Noise , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Noise/adverse effects , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Attention , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Adult , Auditory Fatigue , Time Factors , Reaction Time , Virtual Reality , Auditory Perception/physiology , Fatigue , Hearing Loss/psychology , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Speech Perception/physiology , Saliva/metabolism , Saliva/chemistry , Hearing , Auditory Threshold
2.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241273393, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39113646

ABSTRACT

Hearing loss is common among Veterans, and extensive hearing care resources are prioritized within the Veterans Administration (VA). Severe hearing loss poses unique communication challenges with speech understanding that may not be overcome with amplification. We analyzed data from the VA Audiometric Repository between 2005 and 2017 and the relationship between hearing loss severity with speech recognition scores. We hypothesized that a significant subset of Veterans with severe or worse hearing loss would have poor unaided speech perception outcomes even with adequate audibility. Sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities were compiled using electronic medical records as was self-report measures of hearing disability. We identified a cohort of 137,500 unique Veterans with 232,789 audiograms demonstrating bilateral severe or worse hearing loss (four-frequency PTA > 70 dB HL). The median (IQR; range) age of Veterans at their first audiogram with severe or worse hearing loss was 81 years (74 to 87; 21-90+), and a majority were male (136,087 [99%]) and non-Hispanic white (107,798 [78.4%]). Among those with bilateral severe or worse hearing loss, 41,901 (30.5%) also had poor speech recognition scores (<50% words), with greater hearing loss severity correlating with worse speech perception. We observed variability in speech perception abilities in those with moderate-severe and greater levels of hearing loss who may derive limited benefit from amplification. Veterans with communication challenges may warrant alternative approaches and treatment strategies such as cochlear implants to support communication needs.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Severity of Illness Index , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Aged, 80 and over , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Hearing Loss/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Veterans , Young Adult , Auditory Threshold , Veterans Health , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Hearing Aids
3.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(8): 855-862, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142305

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate sound localization accuracy of subjects with single-sided deafness (SSD) with active transcutaneous bone conduction implants (atBCIs). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Ten SSD patients (with ATBCIS) and 10 controls. INTERVENTIONS: Localization was assessed in a semianechoic chamber using a 24-speaker array. Stimuli included broadband noise (BBN) and narrowband noise (NBN). Perceived stimulus angle was recorded and compared with presented location. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were as follows: 1) mean angular error (MAE) error (°) and regression slope and 2) subjective benefit assessment (Speech Spatial Qualities questionnaire). RESULTS: Subjects with SSD demonstrated worse localization by MAE and regression slope compared with controls for both broadband noise (p < 0.0001) and narrowband noise at 500 Hz and 1000 kHz (p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.1090) in slope between all groups at 4000 Hz. There was no significant difference in slope or MAE aided compared with unaided. Localization ability varied widely within the SSD cohort, with some individuals showing some ability in the unaided condition, best at 4000 Hz. Although SSQ confirmed particular difficulty in the spatial hearing domain, all domains improved with device use. CONCLUSIONS: Localization ability for individuals with SSD falls into a somewhat bimodal distribution. Some have fair localization, particularly at high frequencies, that is preserved but not improved with the atBCI. Others have minimal to no localization ability at any frequency, with no apparent device benefit.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Sound Localization , Humans , Sound Localization/physiology , Bone Conduction/physiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Case-Control Studies , Adult , Prospective Studies , Aged , Hearing Aids
4.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(8): 913-918, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142312

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study reviews the feasibility of implanting active osseointegrated bone conduction devices in young children, below the prior age for FDA indication (<12 years), which has recently been reduced to 5 years. Outcomes included differences in adverse event rates and operative time between two groups (<12 and 12 years or older). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of children receiving active osseointegrated bone conduction devices at a tertiary referral center academic hospital. One hundred and twenty-four children received 135 active osseointegrated bone conduction devices (May 2018-March 2024). RESULTS: Of 135 devices, 77 (57%) were in children <12 years (mean age (SD) = 7.9 (2.0) years, range = 4.9-11.9 years) and 58 (43%) were in 12 years or older (mean age (SD) = 15.1 (1.7) years, range = 12-18 years). Adverse events were significantly higher in the older group, occurring in 8 (10%) of 77 devices in children <12 years and 15 (26%) of 58 devices in children 12 years and older (26%) (Fisher's exact test = 0.0217 at p < 0.05). Major adverse events occurred in 5/124 (4%) patients, with 2 in patients <12 years (2/73, 3%) and 3 in children 12 and older (3/51, 6%). The proportion of major events between groups was not significantly different (Fisher's exact test = 0.4, p < 0.05). Mean surgical time was significantly less (t = -2.8799, df = 120.26, p = 0.005) in the children <12 years (mean (SD) = 66.5 (22.4) min) compared to those 12 and over (mean (SD) = 78.32 (23.1) min). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of active osseointegrated bone conduction devices is feasible in children as young as 5 years and demonstrates low rates of complication. Further miniaturization may allow even earlier safe intervention.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Feasibility Studies , Osseointegration , Humans , Child , Bone Conduction/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Osseointegration/physiology , Adolescent , Treatment Outcome , Hearing Loss, Conductive/surgery , Hearing Aids , Bone-Anchored Prosthesis , Prosthesis Implantation/methods
5.
J Int Adv Otol ; 20(4): 368-371, 2024 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39162058

ABSTRACT

It is unusual to see complications with the preparation of ear mold in order to get hearing aids for children who are in need. However, we came across 2 cases who had a foreign body retained in the middle ear after a long period of time from taking silicon mold impression for hearing aid fitting. One patient presented after 2 years, and the other patient presented after 10 years of hearing aid fitting. We are reporting 2 cases with silicon impression material left in the middle ear for a long period of time after taking an impression for hearing aid fitting and found unexpectedly during exploratory tympanotomy. These reported cases are among the few cases reported worldwide without clear known incidence. This necessitates proper examination by otolaryngologists and the audiologists who are responsible for taking the impression to prevent such complications.


Subject(s)
Ear, Middle , Foreign Bodies , Hearing Aids , Silicones , Humans , Hearing Aids/adverse effects , Ear, Middle/surgery , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Male , Female , Child
6.
JMIR Hum Factors ; 11: e52310, 2024 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133539

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) solutions can improve the quality, accessibility, and equity of health services, fostering early rehabilitation. For individuals with hearing loss, mHealth apps might be designed to support the decision-making processes in auditory diagnostics and provide treatment recommendations to the user (eg, hearing aid need). For some individuals, such an mHealth app might be the first contact with a hearing diagnostic service and should motivate users with hearing loss to seek professional help in a targeted manner. However, personalizing treatment recommendations is only possible by knowing the individual's profile regarding the outcome of interest. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize individuals who are more or less prone to seeking professional help after the repeated use of an app-based hearing test. The goal was to derive relevant hearing-related traits and personality characteristics for personalized treatment recommendations for users of mHealth hearing solutions. METHODS: In total, 185 (n=106, 57.3% female) nonaided older individuals (mean age 63.8, SD 6.6 y) with subjective hearing loss participated in a mobile study. We collected cross-sectional and longitudinal data on a comprehensive set of 83 hearing-related and psychological measures among those previously found to predict hearing help seeking. Readiness to seek help was assessed as the outcome variable at study end and after 2 months. Participants were classified into help seekers and nonseekers using several supervised machine learning algorithms (random forest, naïve Bayes, and support vector machine). The most relevant features for prediction were identified using feature importance analysis. RESULTS: The algorithms correctly predicted action to seek help at study end in 65.9% (122/185) to 70.3% (130/185) of cases, reaching 74.8% (98/131) classification accuracy at follow-up. Among the most important features for classification beyond hearing performance were the perceived consequences of hearing loss in daily life, attitude toward hearing aids, motivation to seek help, physical health, sensory sensitivity personality trait, neuroticism, and income. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the identification of individual characteristics that predict help seeking in older individuals with self-reported hearing loss. Suggestions are made for their implementation in an individual-profiling algorithm and for deriving targeted recommendations in mHealth hearing apps.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss , Mobile Applications , Telemedicine , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Aids
7.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241273342, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39150412

ABSTRACT

During the last decade, there has been a move towards consumer-centric hearing healthcare. This is a direct result of technological advancements (e.g., merger of consumer grade hearing aids with consumer grade earphones creating a wide range of hearing devices) as well as policy changes (e.g., the U.S. Food and Drug Administration creating a new over-the-counter [OTC] hearing aid category). In addition to various direct-to-consumer (DTC) hearing devices available on the market, there are also several validated tools for the self-assessment of auditory function and the detection of ear disease, as well as tools for education about hearing loss, hearing devices, and communication strategies. Further, all can be made easily available to a wide range of people. This perspective provides a framework and identifies tools to improve and maintain optimal auditory wellness across the adult life course. A broadly available and accessible set of tools that can be made available on a digital platform to aid adults in the assessment and as needed, the improvement, of auditory wellness is discussed.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss , Humans , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/therapy , Hearing , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Auditory Perception , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Education as Topic
8.
Hear Res ; 451: 109096, 2024 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116708

ABSTRACT

Congenital or early-onset unilateral hearing loss (UHL) can disrupt the normal development of the auditory system. In extreme cases of UHL (i.e., single sided deafness), consistent cochlear implant use during sensitive periods resulted in cortical reorganization that partially reversed the detrimental effects of unilateral sensory deprivation. There is a gap in knowledge, however, regarding cortical plasticity i.e. the brain's capacity to adapt, reorganize, and develop binaural pathways in milder degrees of UHL rehabilitated by a hearing aid (HA). The current study was set to investigate early-stage cortical processing and electrophysiological manifestations of binaural processing by means of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to speech sounds, in children with moderate to severe-to-profound UHL using a HA. Fourteen children with UHL (CHwUHL), 6-14 years old consistently using a HA for 3.5 (±2.3) years participated in the study. CAEPs were elicited to the speech sounds /m/, /g/, and /t/ in three listening conditions: monaural [Normal hearing (NH), HA], and bilateral [BI (NH + HA)]. Results indicated age-appropriate CAEP morphology in the NH and BI listening conditions in all children. In the HA listening condition: (1) CAEPs showed similar morphology to that found in the NH listening condition, however, the mature morphology observed in older children in the NH listening condition was not evident; (2) P1 was elicited in all but two children with severe-to-profound hearing loss, to at least one speech stimuli, indicating effective audibility; (3) A significant mismatch in timing and synchrony between the NH and HA ear was found; (4) P1 was sensitive to the acoustic features of the eliciting stimulus and to the amplification characteristics of the HA. Finally, a cortical binaural interaction component (BIC) was derived in most children. In conclusion, the current study provides first-time evidence for cortical plasticity and partial reversal of the detrimental effects of moderate to severe-to-profound UHL rehabilitated by a HA. The derivation of a cortical biomarker of binaural processing implies that functional binaural pathways can develop when sufficient auditory input is provided to the affected ear. CAEPs may thus serve as a clinical tool for assessing, monitoring, and managing CHwUHL using a HA.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Cortex , Auditory Pathways , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Neuronal Plasticity , Speech Perception , Humans , Child , Male , Female , Auditory Cortex/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Auditory Pathways/physiopathology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Correction of Hearing Impairment , Electroencephalography , Age Factors , Biomarkers , Hearing
11.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 183: 112031, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39111074

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of three factors using retrospective chart review: age at which 2nd cochlear implant (CI) is implanted, prior hearing aid (HA) experience in the 2nd CI ear, and long-term experience with bilateral cochlear implants (BICIs) on sound localization in children with sequential BICIs. METHODS: Mean absolute error (MAE) in localizing speech noise of 60 children with sequential BICIs was compared across four age groups of the 2nd CI (1-5.0; 5.1-10.0; 10.1-14.0; & 14.1-19.0 years) and two extents of prior HA experience (more than and less than one year). MAE was also longitudinally analyzed after 4-6 years of experience with BICI involving 18 participants out of 60. RESULTS: Children who received 2nd CI before five years of age demonstrated significantly better localization than those who received it after ten years of age. More than one year of prior HA experience in the 2nd CI ear and extensive experience with sequential BICIs significantly enhanced localization performance. Inter-implant intervals and age at the 2nd CI showed a significant positive correlation with the MAE (poorer localization). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that age at 2nd CI is important in developing sound localization skills. Based on the results, obtaining 2nd CI within the first five years of life and no later than ten years old is recommended. The results also suggest that longer use of amplification before 2nd CI and prolonged BICI experience significantly fosters localization development.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Sound Localization , Humans , Sound Localization/physiology , Child , Retrospective Studies , Child, Preschool , Male , Female , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Age Factors , Adolescent , Hearing Aids , Infant , Young Adult , Speech Perception/physiology , Time Factors , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/surgery , Treatment Outcome
12.
J Int Adv Otol ; 20(3): 196-202, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39128043

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:  Incomplete partition type II (IP-II) malformation is often accompanied by a large vestibular aqueduct (LVA). In IP anomalies, the patient's auditory rehabilitation requirements are decided according to the presence of inner ear structures and the degree of hearing loss (HL). There has been limited research on auditory rehabilitation (AR) requirement selection in patients diagnosed with IP-II and LVA. This study investigated the typical characteristics of HL and AR choices in patients diagnosed with IP-II and LVA. METHODS:  Patients with IP-II and LVA (n=55; 25 women and 30 men) were identified, and audiological evaluations were performed. The patient's demographic characteristics, the type and degree of HL, the AR method, age at diagnosis, and educational status were retrospectively compared. RESULTS:  The distribution of our 55 patients according to cochlear implants, hearing aids (HA), and bimodal applications was 29.1% (n=16), 43.6% (n=24), and 27.3% (n=15), respectively. Statistical analyses using chi-square tests found no significant differences in the incidence of dizziness/imbalance, tinnitus, HL progression, or the degree and onset of HL among the patients. CONCLUSION:  The data revealed different audiological characteristics among patients with IP-II and LVA, as well as different AR solutions. The most widely used AR modality was found to be HA. Prediction of sudden versus progressive HL development among patients is challenging, and the characteristics of IP-II vary. Therefore, they should be interpreted with caution.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Vestibular Aqueduct , Humans , Female , Male , Vestibular Aqueduct/abnormalities , Retrospective Studies , Hearing Aids/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Child , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Adolescent , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Child, Preschool , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data
13.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965850

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant (CI) users with single-sided deafness (SSD). Methods: This study was a single-center prospective cohort study. Eleven Mandarin-speaking adult SSD patients who underwent CI implantation at Capital Medical University Beijing Tongren Hospital from August 2020 to October 2021 were recruited, including 6 males and 5 females, with the age ranging from 24 to 50 years old. In a sound field with 7 loudspeakers distributed at 180°, we measured root-mean-square error(RMSE)in SSD patients at the preoperative, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month after switch-on to assess the improvement of sound source localization. The Mandarin Speech Perception (MSP) was used in the sound field to test the speech reception threshold (SRT) of SSD patients under different signal-to-noise locations in a steady-state noise under conditions of CI off and CI on, to reflect the head shadow effect(SSSDNNH), binaural summation effect(S0N0) and squelch effect(S0NSSD). The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess changes in tinnitus severity and tinnitus loudness in SSD patients at each time point. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale(SSQ) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Scale (NCIQ) were used to assess the subjective benefits of spatial speech perception and quality of life in SSD patients after cochlear implantation. SPSS 19.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: SSD patients showed a significant improvement in the poorer ear in hearing thresholds with CI-on compared with CI-off; The ability to localize the sound source was significantly improved, with statistically significant differences in RMSE at each follow-up time compared with the preoperative period (P<0.05). In the SSSDNNH condition, which reflects the head shadow effect, the SRT in binaural hearing was significantly improved by 6.5 dB compared with unaided condition, and the difference was statistically significant (t=6.25, P=0.001). However, there was no significant improvement in SRT between the binaural hearing condition and unaided conditions in the S0N0 and S0NSSD conditions (P>0.05). The total score of THI and three dimensions were significant decreased (P<0.05). Tinnitus VAS scores were significantly lower in binaural hearing compared to the unaided condition (P<0.001). The total score of SSQ, and the scores of speech and spatial dimensions were significant improved in binaural hearing compared to the unaided condition (P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in NCIQ questionnaire scores between preoperative and postoperative (P>0.05), and only the self-efficacy subscore showed a significant increase(Z=-2.497,P=0.013). Conclusion: CI could help Mandarin-speaking SSD patients restore binaural hearing to some extent, improve sound localization and speech recognition in noise. In addition, CI in SSD patients could suppress tinnitus, reduce the loudness of tinnitus, and improve subjective perceptions of spatial hearing and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Humans , Male , Female , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Hearing Loss, Unilateral/surgery , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Young Adult , Sound Localization , Tinnitus/surgery , Deafness/surgery , Hearing Aids
14.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 15029, 2024 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951556

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in haptic technology could allow haptic hearing aids, which convert audio to tactile stimulation, to become viable for supporting people with hearing loss. A tactile vocoder strategy for audio-to-tactile conversion, which exploits these advances, has recently shown significant promise. In this strategy, the amplitude envelope is extracted from several audio frequency bands and used to modulate the amplitude of a set of vibro-tactile tones. The vocoder strategy allows good consonant discrimination, but vowel discrimination is poor and the strategy is susceptible to background noise. In the current study, we assessed whether multi-band amplitude envelope expansion can effectively enhance critical vowel features, such as formants, and improve speech extraction from noise. In 32 participants with normal touch perception, tactile-only phoneme discrimination with and without envelope expansion was assessed both in quiet and in background noise. Envelope expansion improved performance in quiet by 10.3% for vowels and by 5.9% for consonants. In noise, envelope expansion improved overall phoneme discrimination by 9.6%, with no difference in benefit between consonants and vowels. The tactile vocoder with envelope expansion can be deployed in real-time on a compact device and could substantially improve clinical outcomes for a new generation of haptic hearing aids.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Noise , Speech Perception , Humans , Speech Perception/physiology , Male , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Touch/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Touch Perception/physiology , Hearing Loss/physiopathology
18.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(7): e541-e546, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995722

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: Here, we aim to 1) expand the available evidence for the use of machine learning techniques for soft tissue classification after BCD surgery and 2) discuss the implications of such approaches toward the development of classification applications to aid in tissue monitoring. BACKGROUND: The application of machine learning techniques in the soft tissue literature has become a large field of study. One of the most commonly reported outcomes after percutaneous bone-conduction device (BCD) surgery is soft tissue health. Unfortunately, the classification of tissue around the abutment as healthy versus not healthy is a subjective process, even though such decisions can have implications for treatment (i.e., topical steroid versus surgical revision) and resources (e.g., clinician time). METHODS: We built and tested a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for the classification of tissues that were rated as "green" (i.e., healthy), "yellow" (i.e., unhealthy minor), and "red" (i.e., unhealthy severe). METHODS: Representative image samples were gathered from a regional bone-conduction amplification site (N = 398; 181 samples of green; 144 samples of yellow; 73 samples of red). The image samples were cropped, zoomed, and normalized. Feature extraction was then implemented and used as the input to train an advanced CNN model. RESULTS: Accuracy of image classification for the healthy ("green") versus not healthy ("yellow" and "red") model was approximately 87%. Accuracy of image classification for the unhealthy ("yellow") versus unhealthy ("red") model was approximately 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring tissue health is an ongoing challenge for BCD users and their clinicians not trained in soft tissue management (e.g., audiologists). If machine learning can aid in the classification of tissue health, this would have significant implications for stakeholders. Here we discuss how machine learning can be applied to tissue classification as a potential technological aid in the coming years.


Subject(s)
Machine Learning , Neural Networks, Computer , Humans , Skin , Hearing Aids , Bone Conduction/physiology , Bone-Anchored Prosthesis
19.
FP Essent ; 542: 7-13, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39018125

ABSTRACT

Hearing loss is the cause of significant morbidity throughout the United States and the world. Because of numerous factors, such as ongoing noise exposure, poorly controlled chronic disease, and an aging population, the burden of hearing loss is expected to continue to increase. Hearing loss commonly is categorized as conductive, sensorineural, or mixed. The type of hearing loss can be determined through a combination of patient history and physical examination, and then confirmed with audiometry and tympanometry. Advanced imaging is not typically necessary, but it may be helpful in specific instances. The presentation of sudden sensorineural hearing loss should prompt urgent referral to an otolaryngologist and audiologist. Management of this condition is selective but may initially include oral corticosteroids. Management for chronic hearing loss involves the use of hearing aids, which can offer a large benefit to users but historically have been expensive and not covered by many insurance plans. Recent US legislation has made hearing aids more accessible and affordable by allowing direct-to-consumer marketing and offering over-the-counter hearing aids without a clinical evaluation.


Subject(s)
Hearing Aids , Humans , Acoustic Impedance Tests , Audiometry , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/therapy , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Hearing Loss, Sudden/therapy , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , United States
20.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 182: 112020, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38964177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lexical tone presents challenges to cochlear implant (CI) users especially in noise conditions. Bimodal hearing utilizes residual acoustic hearing in the contralateral side and may offer benefits for tone recognition in noise. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate tone recognition in both steady-state noise and multi-talker babbles by the prelingually-deafened, Mandarin-speaking children with unilateral CIs or bimodal hearing. METHODS: Fifty-three prelingually-deafened, Mandarin-speaking children who received CIs participated in this study. Twenty-two of them were unilateral CI users and 31 wore a hearing aid (HA) in the contralateral ear (i.e., bimodal hearing). All subjects were tested for Mandarin tone recognition in quiet and in two types of maskers: speech-spectrum-shaped noise (SSN) and two-talker babbles (TTB) at four signal-to-noise ratios (-6, 0, +6, and +12 dB). RESULTS: While no differences existed in tone recognition in quiet between the two groups, the Bimodal group outperformed the Unilateral CI group under noise conditions. The differences between the two groups were significant at SNRs of 0, +6, and +12 dB in the SSN conditions (all p < 0.05), and at SNRs of +6 and +12 dB of TTB conditions (both p < 0.01), but not significant at other conditions (p > 0.05). The TTB exerted a greater masking effect than the SSN for tone recognition in the Unilateral CI group as well as in the Bimodal group at all SNRs tested (all p < 0.05). Among demographic or audiometric variables, only age at implantation showed a weak but significant correlation with the mean tone recognition performance under the SSN conditions (r = -0.276, p = 0.045). However, when Bonferroni correction was applied to the correlation analysis results, the weak correlation became not significant. CONCLUSION: Prelingually-deafened children with CIs face challenges in tone perception in noisy environments, especially when the noise is fluctuating in amplitude such as the multi-talker babbles. Wearing a HA on the contralateral side when residual hearing permits is beneficial for tone recognition in noise.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Noise , Speech Perception , Humans , Male , Female , Speech Perception/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Deafness/surgery , Hearing Aids , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Language
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL